| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
As some have mentioned, this site is definitely more on the artsy side rather than the erotic. If Met-Art branched out and did some shoots with toys and actual lesbianism it would score out at a 98 on a review for me. While the girls are amazing and there's tons to see it's just a tad too softcore for my long term viewing tastes despite my love of pictures over videos.
|
05-11-09 11:41am
|
Reply
627
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
Good review (here and on Hegre Art too). My only advice is that if you start reviewing sites that don't have as many reviews as these is to give a few more site statistics (pic and video sizes, zips, etc.). Otherwise things look pretty sweet.
|
03-27-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
628
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
OMG, if they did a Met-Art hardcore site I would be in heaven, especially if they used the same high quality production and quality at the flagship site. However, I am also of the opinion that I don't really see a h/c site fitting into their marketing scheme. At best it would be a small site since most of the models their probably wouldn't do hc and why ruin a great thing they already have going.
|
12-06-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
629
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaman's Review
Hey Hondaman. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. Good first review. Hope to see more soon.
|
11-13-08 03:59pm
|
Review
630
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
631
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks for the heads up on the pic size Khan. Still not enough given this day and age though.
|
07-16-08 02:06pm
|
Reply
632
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
I've been looking at this site recently and I'm sorry to here that even the newer pics are still pretty small (from what I've seen on tgp sites they're still 800x600, basically what they were when I was a member years ago). I was hoping they'd beef it up but whoa is the picture lover here at PU. Thanks for the review. I think I'll keep my money for now.
|
07-15-08 11:07pm
|
Comment
633
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
|
06-04-09 10:50pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
634
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mediafan's Comment
I just don't understand why they split up mofos and brazzerspass to begin with, especially if they're just going cut back on the updates for both of the networks. I guess it's mostly marketing to generate more $$$ but since they're putting themselves out there as a megasite(s) they need to a lot better than a few updates a week. In the end I think it's just going to cost them customers instead of making them money.
|
05-05-09 10:06pm
|
Reply
635
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Yeah, it's probably time for a review but I'm thinking it's just marketing. They recently reduced the number of updates to the Brazzer's site in order to start beefing the rolls on Mofos. You're going to see the same girls and pretty much get the same thing as Brazzers just in a new package.
|
02-19-09 11:34am
|
Reply
636
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
I'm currently a Brazzer's member and have seen all the hype they've been pushing on Mofos. From looking at the tour it basically just looks like a Brazzer's clone in terms of quality (aka - average at best). Apparently they're just trying to up their revenue streams by pushing another network you have to pay for. Frankly, they should just raise their price on the Brazzer's site and add more content but maybe their bean counters figured that this route would create more money overall. I think I'm sort of done with Brazzer's so the new offerings don't tempt me too much.
|
12-23-08 03:36pm
|
Reply
637
|
Mommy Loves Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I've done a few ultra cheapie trials in the last year without problems but all of those have been done with reputable sites and/or billing processors. I mostly posted this as a warning for newbies or casual porn users since the potential problems are less obvious than with some other sites.
|
07-24-09 12:01pm
|
Comment
638
|
Mommy Loves Cock
(0)
|
|
07-23-09 04:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
639
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review, thanks Denner. I had my eye on this site for a while but I think I'll put it on hold at least for now.
|
04-30-08 03:59pm
|
Comment
640
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
|
11-29-11 04:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
641
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ 13 network site
+ Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Good mix of Euro and American babes
+ Good action and professional quality shoots
+ Good download speeds on vids
+ No DRM or download limits. |
| Cons: |
- Cross sales on sign-up page
- A lot more action in the vids than the pics
- Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics
- Search is OK but could be better
- Each site in network updates 2x per month
- A few deadlinks and pics that don't load |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases.
Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files.
Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot.
There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good.
There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning.
Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal. |
|
05-13-09 11:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
642
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
Review
643
|
Nakedby
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Excellent photography featuring natural French girls
+ About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content)
+ High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics
+ Good 7 day full access trial of $10
+ Some model information provided and nice clean site design
+ Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week)
+ No DRM |
| Cons: |
- Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options
- Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set)
- Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone)
- Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book
- Zip feature only available in medium size |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here.
Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here.
There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites.
For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either.
Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side. |
|
08-14-08 03:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
644
|
Nasty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for the review on this one. Just a general comment in that I looked at the tour page and found stuff that's been on my computer for a long time; stuff from Clubseventeen if that site is still around and a few others. Not sure how much of this new or just recycled old content.
|
02-19-13 12:13pm
|
Reply
645
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Reply
Way to go Joe! I've had to defend some of my reviews from webmasters before; it is a bit tedious and annoying in my book. Good for you to stick by your guns.
|
08-21-09 01:11pm
|
Review
646
|
Naughty America
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ $10 a month thru TBP (you can renew for less than that going through cancellation)
+ Bills through Epoch
+ Almost 7900 scenes of hardcore porn going back over 14 years over a 40 site network with thousands of porn stars (big emphasis on American babes)
+ All scenes have pics with zips and vid downloads sized from postage stamps to 4k monsters
+ Updates about 10-12 times a week
+ Navigation is pretty easy
+ Access to VR content without paying extra
+ Streaming vids have the small pop up window showing what action is occuring where when you move across the time bar.
+ Professionally produced content with good lighting and generally good production values
+ There is “live show” content that has been archived for those who like that stuff |
| Cons: |
- Cross checked presale upon signup
- Ads, upsells and (new to me) offers to text with favorite porn star (cause you know all she's doing is waiting for you to send her a dic pic)
- Download speeds vary a lot, from acceptable (2 mb/sec) to 1990's call me in 3 days when the download is done (single digit kb/sec ... yes, that's “kilobyte per second”). Steaming at even the lowest resolutions can be challenging a times too.
- Things get real repetitive real quick. Very little imagination or originality here. Just a generic hardcore site.
- 40 sites on the network but the only two themes are co-eds and milfs.
- Lots of tats and lots of silicone.
- Some sites are dead and most only update sporadically but given the over all uniform nature of the site it's too big of a deal (the sites aren't really niche specific)
- Obviously, the oldest content isn't nearly as good in quality as the more recent stuff.
- Have do a “check the boxes that apply” captcha every log in (challenging for my IQ). |
| Bottom Line: |
So, let's face facts. In short, given the sheer volume of downloadable porn at your finger tips you really can't go wrong for a $10 monthly membership. Hell, I spent more than that on a 6-pack at the store the other day. However, unless you're used to sipping the low end crapola (beer or porn, doesn't matter) you're gonna get tired of this place in short order. Yes, you do have some cuties in the form of co-eds and some mighty fine milfs but the lack of originality and repetitiveness of the scenes kill the fun fairly soon (Look! A big chested tatted up gal getting it on with the neighbor checking the usual position boxes. Repeat ad infinitum.) Toss in the god awful download speeds that rear their ugly head in seemingly random times and you won't be spending month after month here. Here's the details:
PICS: I have to say that pics are actually one of the highlights here for me now. The early stuff (start to early 2013) is only 1000x670 but after that it jumps to 1300x900 and then to 2000x1600 in 2014. Do note that the 1300x900 pics almost always come in 150 or 300 dpi so they're effectively twice that size or more assuming you adjust your pics for 72 dpi imaging on your display. As usual there is generally more action in the vids than on the pics. It isn't uncommon for the pics to not really have anything to do with the video scene either which is fine by me (2 for the price of one in my book). A minor beef is that once the resolution size jumps up to 1300x900 or more you get a lot of pics (often 250-400) but you get dozens of pics showing the same damn thing which gets annoying while creating unneccessarily large zip files (500 mb isn't uncommon).
VIDS: I know that my computer and my wireless router aren't setting any speed records but, as noted above, this place can make dying of boredom a real possibility at times. Assuming you get a decent connection the viewing ain't bad though. They claim 1080 going back to about 2009 but some of that I think is suspect since they have been remastering some older content and they claim you can download that in 4k … in other words all you're getting is lower end video fomatted as 1080 or 4k. However, within the last 4 years everything seems good. You can download the short 5 minute version in quicktime, you got mobile downloads, wmv clips and full length, and full length 480, 720, 1080 and 4k. You can stream in 480, 720 or 1080 although a few sites had problems loading streams for me. You also have roku options that I didn't use. VR comes at no extra charge but the VR scenes only come in VR, no 1080, etc. The vids look good even at 480.
NAV: Navigation is not a total disaster here like it often gets on networks of this size. The best way to go is go through by site or by model. A few sites have a lot of pages but you can manually enter the page number in the url to get where you want faster. All scenes are dated. There is model directory that seems complete but has almost no useful info (lots of stars born on January 1, 1600) and the same dreadful lines are used to describe every starlet (“she has a body made for porn and is ready to f*ck”).
Like I said, there isn't a lot of originality going on here. It's all single camera action with the usual set ups and usual positions. There is a little POV but mostly standard shoots through and through. There's very little of anything other than white booty with big tits and tats grinding away. I have to agree with Exotics4me and his review (always read his reviews) that it's about 2/3 milf action and 1/3 co-ed action.
If I had categorize this site in two words it would be “Brazzer's Lite” - you get a lot of the same looking girls but without the production value and less originality (if you can call Brazzer's original but that's a story for another day). For me, this place gets an 81 mostly because of the crapola download speeds I suffered through. Still, for $10 a month, I'll probably come back again in a few years. |
|
10-02-16 10:29pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
647
|
Naughty America
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy
++ Very good tags and cross site search functions
++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p
+ Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie
+ Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff
+ Good monthly price through TBP
+ Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form.
+ Lots of American girls
+ Professional lighting and production value
+ Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue.
+ All the content besides the live shows is hardcore |
| Cons: |
-- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics)
-- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes
-- Slow site at times (they need more servers)
- Cross sales on signup
- Stupid social networking keeps popping up |
| Bottom Line: |
I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve.
PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help.
VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though.
OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes).
There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics.
The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen).
The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6.
So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again. |
|
07-11-11 03:42pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
648
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Review
Good first review there MountainMan. Glad you've come down from your peak of to share your porn wisdom with the masses. A few more technical specs (vid sizes, etc.) would be useful but darn good for a first review. Hope to see more.
|
04-21-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
649
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I do admit you did a good job of justifying your "100" score. My only beef with NA is that their pics lack size, especially the older stuff which hurts them in my book a pic guy. When looking at your score it's more based upon your preference which is perfectly acceptable. Overall, when looking at everything the site has to offer in terms of specs I couldn't pull the trigger on such a score. Guess I try to be too objective.
|
02-20-09 11:56am
|
Reply
650
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
I've been thinking about going to this site in the near future. I'm more of picture fan and I was wondering what size the pics come in now? I believe the older material is/was 800x600 but was wondering if the newer stuff has gotten larger?
|
07-17-08 03:59pm
|
