| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Evil Angel Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Review
Sorry to hear about the lack of new content and mediocre quality and download speeds. For anyone reading this, if you're interested in the Evil Angel site(s) you'd probably better go now since they're being sued for obscenity and they might not be around beyond the Spring of 09.
|
11-19-08 04:14pm
|
Comment
552
|
Exclusive Club
(0)
|
|
11-15-08 06:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
553
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
|
10-16-13 09:34pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
554
|
Felched
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
555
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
My impression of this site is pretty much like yours. I just ended a multi-month subscription to 21st Sextury and while I enjoyed the site I thought that HotLegsandFeet does a much better job. The emphasis here isn't so much on the legs and feet except as an excuse to close up shots that blur the rest of the body. The emphasis on the site is pretty much all hardcore with their 2010 updates too. While it's good, I think the photography skills and use of lingerie and the foot/leg tease factor lack those of the DDF site. Not bad as part of the network but probably not worth it on its own for the foot obsessed types.
|
07-23-10 11:38am
|
Reply
556
|
French-e-Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I was a member about 2 years or so ago and I don't recall them limiting the number of sets available to members. Just glancing at the TBP review it sounds like that might have changed (sort of a rip off in my book since it's just recycling content). Sorry I can't be of help now but it's sounding like the format has changed.
|
08-19-08 06:03pm
|
Review
557
|
Fresh Outta High School
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Cheap $5, 3 day full access trial with TBP
+ Generally hot looking 18 - 23 old starlets in HC action
+ Exclusive content
+ Videos are pretty hot and 30 minutes long on average and no DRM
+ Access to 24 original content sites (Reelpass) and 22 nonexclusive bonus sites
+ Good for those with a schoolgirl / uniform fetish
+ No watermarks |
| Cons: |
- It's a Newsensations product, 'nuff said
- Pics are small and lack a lot of the content found in the vids
- No email confirmation of signup or cancellation with the netbilling.com processor
- Updates only 1x per week
- Some advertising on site
- Reptitive in sets and theme |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site on a trial since I noticed it wasn't part of the Newsensations network and I was hoping that maybe they were upgrading their product since it wasn't part of that group ... and I was wrong.
Currently, there are 62 sets/scenes and all have pics and vids. Pretty much all feature US youngsters in school girl skirts and conservative tops getting bopped in various ways. The production value is mostly professional with decent lighting and plot settings. Most of the time the girl stays mostly clothed so if you're into uniform type sex you might like this.
A lot of the sets are the same and scenes don't vary much so it does get repetitive. There a lot of known pornstars but a few fresh faces as well. No real model directory or model background is offered.
Pictures: Each set has about 200 to 300 pics but most are them are just of the girl stripping. Sizes only come in at 1024x680 with a few random 1530x1020's tossed in just to prove that they're intentionlly skimping on pic size. All sets have zip with good labelling. Like I noted, a lot of action on the vids get left out of the pics and you usually end up with a few dozen HC pics. Basically, don't go here for the pics.
Videos: Vid size maxes out at 800x600 with full scenes eating up a few hundred megs of disc space. Download speeds were OK. WMV is the only real option here for the biggest size. The action tends to be pretty good overall. There are hundreds of vid caps for each set so you know what you'll be getting on your downloads.
As I noted you also get access to the reelpass network with is mostly a newsensations clone. You do get access to newsensations so joining here on the trial might be a cheap way to update from that network if you like their product. This network (reelpass) is not pic friendly so, again, go here for the vids. The bonus sites are just the usual suspects (teensforcash, herfistanal, etc) and pretty much stream only though you can download clips if you're desperate for second rate entertainment.
On it's own this site merits a 79. Kick it up a notch or two when rating the whole network. Bigger and more pics would be a welcomed bonus (one of the main reasons I don't go back to Newsensations any more) and bigger vids would also be a nice addition.
I did the trial and had no problem getting what I wanted from this site in a day. If you like school girls this site is OK but you might be more entertained with a site like Innocenthigh. If you have the uniform sex fetish going, this ain't bad but I'd stick with the trial. |
|
02-04-09 04:19pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
558
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Just wanted to congrats on 500 freaking reviews! As usual, great stuff in the review. Keep on truckin'.
|
08-11-21 11:44am
|
Review
559
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Scored a $10 Black Friday monthly membership from TBP (currently $18)
+ No cross sales on signup. Bills through Epoch.
+ Mostly attractive US models on the main sites.
+ Very basic web design but it works and getting around is easy.
+ Decent download and stream speeds
+ Good production standards (usually).
+ Good streaming video function in standard, 720 or 1080 for most vids.
+ Almost all scenes have pics and vids.
+ Good mix of known pornstars and amateurs. |
| Cons: |
- This is a four network site and the only one that has any reasonable amount of content is Fuckedhard18. The rest are throwaway sites.
-No model info, just a girls first name. Limited search due to funky tagging.
- Limited updates (Fuckedhard18 no longer updates).
- Most pics are 1020 x 680 or less so it's not really a pic site.
- Fuckedhard18 is highly repetitive in its use of the set, shooting angles and “plot” development.
- The whole site is pretty much an advertisement to buy porn from other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Like many Americans, I was still tripping on turkey tryptophan when I scored a cheap deal on a Black Friday and quickly came to regret the quality of my purchase. I sort of like the massage themed stuff which is what Fuckedhard18 is but I got pretty much caused me to abandon this network fairly quickly. Well, let's just break this network down by site since that seems like it will cause me the least amount of pain:
Newgirlpov: A 15 scene vanity project for the guy shooting it. Girl gets interviewed, screwed a little, dances in her undies to music and has more sex with the dude who makes her call him “Daddy”. Every actress gets a perfect score in the ratings categories the producer lists on every scene page. Yay, participation trophies for all. Just a few pics associated with the clips here. Nothing here you haven't seen done better elsewhere.
FuckedhardGFS: About 100 scenes of mostly pornstars posing and having sex in about 1/3 of the scenes. Hasn't updated in years. More amateur in terms of production value. Interesting but the quality is only OK.
Bangable: About 200 scenes of random amateur chicks in various states of undress dancing and prancing to music in video scenes that mostly 1 – 3 minutes long (almost no pics). WTF? The only thing that could have made this site enjoyable was if Rick Astley's “Never Give You Up” video came up in the background of every scene because to even call this erotica is just a Rickroll.
Fuckedhard18: About 350 scenes and no updates. To describe one scene is describe every single one. Girl walks onto cheapo massage parlor set, strips and gets interviewed by massage dude about pointless stuff. Guy fingers girl, they have sex in 4 or 5 positions while the guy sometimes still chats with her and gives onscreen direction (aka – no romance factor and little connectivity between the actors). Every scene is pretty much the same and involves the same positions and camera angles. The fact that every scene looks and plays out the same sort of killed it for me. Granted, the girls are good looking and some of the sex was OK but it wasn't enough to overcome the monotony for me.
TBP lists pics here as 1500x1020 but that's only for about 10% of the scenes. The rest feature 1500x1020 shots of the model posing but all of the action is shot in landscape mode and only reaches 1020x680. All scenes have zips.
I downloaded very little video so I didn't really track the specs on the vids and can only say they seem decent. No problems streaming or jumping around in a vid while streaming. The video download options are sometime weird: sometimes you get mp4 and wmv options, sometimes one or the other. I found that the “HDUltra” download option is 1080, the “Mp4HD” is 720 and anything else is either 480 p or standard def.
Be aware that there are 22 sites listed in the pull down menu on the homepage. At first it looks great cause it shows Wowgirls, JulesJordan, JoyMi and others. The downside is that there is about 10 scenes for each of these sites and the quality available is less than you get from those actual sites. Basically, this networks seems to be geared towards generating cross sales to these places.
Overall, this site seems like it's dead or dying and you're better off saving a few pesos by skipping this one unless you're really into massage content. |
|
12-12-16 04:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
560
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for updating this one (still can't believe TBP hasn't done a review here). Just curious what size the photo zips are?
|
02-07-16 02:28pm
|
Reply
561
|
Full Screen Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU Yote. Very good first couple of reviews, hope to see more.
|
04-27-10 04:16pm
|
Reply
562
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
Hey man, thanks for the update here. I definitely liked the site but haven't been back in years. Maybe I'll get back there later this year. Thanks for the technical specs too (sorry if I was giving you a hard time in the forum about that stuff).
|
05-21-09 12:22pm
|
Comment
563
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
|
05-08-08 12:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
564
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
Just wanted to say very good review there.
|
05-27-10 11:59am
|
Review
565
|
Gaping Angels
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP
++ 17 site network
++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites
+ No cross sales on signup
+ Some 720 sized HD vids
+ Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading)
+ Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that
+ No DRM
+ A good number of recognizable porn stars
+ 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches
+ Several updates per week |
| Cons: |
-- Crappy search function and no cross site search
-- Photosets are worthless and no zip function
- HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection
- A lot of sites have some overlapping content
- Video quality varies from great to crap
- Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags
- My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me)
- Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality
- If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks.
- Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line:
PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics.
VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting.
NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want.
Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period.
Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score. |
|
04-13-11 02:38pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
566
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
One of the things I have advocated members to do in the past when faced with spammers is to give the newbie member a negative trust vote. I tried to do this recently and noticed that I couldn't give a negative trust vote, only a positive. Amanda might want to check on this.
|
10-24-17 11:34am
|
Reply
567
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I haven't joined there in a number of years but as memory recalls the material is almost all nonexclusive. If you've been a member of Twistys or Babestv or Babelicious or similar megasite fecently you've probably already seen most of what they have. Twisty's is cheaper so I haven't bothered to go back to Glamourmodles in a while.
|
03-13-09 10:10pm
|
Comment
568
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
|
05-29-09 01:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
569
|
Hailey Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Just wanted to say that it's good to see you back here after so long.
|
08-26-10 11:19am
|
Review
570
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Prior members look for occasional $10 a month memberships in your in box (otherwise $20 a month)
+ Access to the DDF Network of sites
+ Over 1000 scenes of mostly exclusive eurobabe hardcore action with updates roughly every 2 days.
+ Bills through Epoch
+ Very good download speeds (consistent 2mb/sec for me)
+ Excellent navigation
+ The last few years have 1920 x 1080 resolution vids. All scenes have zips but only in the max picture size.
+ Good model directory that seems complete and shows the tags associated with that model.
+ Pics come mostly come in 2000x1300 rez.
+ Professional high end production value. |
| Cons: |
- About 20% of recent updates is "guest content" that only allows you to stream a video supplied by another site.
- Some older vids (I'm talking 7-10 years ago) don't have working streams even though it's indicated as available.
- Some content recycling (about 3-4 times a year).
- Some "Hidden" content that you can only find via the model directory (my guess is that it's waiting to be recycled).
- Searching via tags is, as usual, not really worth your time on a site this size.
- Quality still very good compared to other sites bit appears to be slipping a bit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was going to do a review on the whole DDF Network but exoticsforme just did a very complete review so I'll just focus on this site as it's the main reason I keep coming back to the network.
As you'd expect, DDF puts out high quality product and this site is no exception. Here's a quick run down:
PICS: All scenes have pics and zips but zips only come in one size (max rez). The oldest stuff is not worth it at roughly 500x800 rez but most everything the last 10+ years is 2000x1300 or 1600x1000 (for the older stuff). They've cut back a bit on pic count recently - usually topping out at about 100 while a few years ago they'd push about 150. My only minor beef with the most recent pics is "photo density": meaning you get a decent sized downloaded pic but the file size isn't that large. This is fine for monitor viewing like I do but for those who watch on their big screen tv's the lack of pixels will become apparent.
VIDS: The new stuff is very good at a very high bit rate (see the TBP review for more specs) and definitely HD but does not truly qualify as 4k. Download speeds are very good. Recent vids have 4 download options plus stream. For the last 2 years or so the stream function also has tags that let you jump to specific action in the vid with pushing the bar which is nice. With the exception of some pretty old vids the stream function worked well. The oldest content here lacks vids (yep, back in the day when pics were all you got - tells you how far back they go here).
NAV: Some of the best navigation I've seen in a while. You can select a site and search by update, year/month, or by tags. You get 20 scenes per page and you can page jump easily. Click on scene and the vid is on top. Scroll down and you get the first page of pics (you can easily go forward back on the pic pages without reloading the whole page). It saves you a lot of clicking and opening scenes in separate windows which is a nice change.
Overall, you really can't go wrong here if you're into hardcore. The only real downer is the more frequent use of stream only guest content and the occasional recycled scene. The last few years feature a fair amount of anal content if you're into that. I've noticed that they've expanded their stable of photographers (aka - "outsourced") which leads to some variation of scene quality.
Otherwise it's a good mix of b/g and multiple partner eurobabe porn (yes, the vids are in English although it's struggle for some actors). Not too many tatoos and not too many fake breasts which is a nice break too. On it's own I give this site an 89 but when you add in the network with multiple daily updates of high quality nastiness you're easily into a score of 90+. |
|
01-13-16 06:24pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
571
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging.
+ Exclusive content.
+ About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general.
+ Professional quality production and lighting.
+ Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time).
+ Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser.
+ High quality pics, all with zips.
+ Good model directory and generally good search.
+ All updates are date stamped for future reference.
+ Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well. |
| Cons: |
- Not all HD labelled vids are HD.
- Search options for pics are worthless.
- Content gets a bit repetitive.
- Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work.
- As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality.
- Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out.
- Need more screen cap previews for the vids.
- Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny:
PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets.
VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not.
The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going.
Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here. |
|
04-07-13 08:33pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
572
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Review
Entertaining review. Thanks.
|
06-02-09 04:15pm
|
Comment
573
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
|
05-29-08 12:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
574
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
A DDF megasite would probably be the ultimate porn experience on the web. If he posted all his stuff in one place it would take months to download all the stuff and updates would be coming every few hours. Porn nirvana.
However, the cost would probably be prohibitive and I'm sure Deny likes the money he's generating now by having several niche sites as well as selling some of his material to other sites.
|
05-02-08 12:04pm
|
Review
575
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary |
| Bottom Line: |
I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.
First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.
The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.
The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.
The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.
My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.
This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money |
|
05-01-08 11:46pm
Replies (3)
|
