| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
In short, this site will probably give you what you're looking for. If you can't decide for sure, all of the sites under the DDF banner have an $8 two day full access trial if you want to test the waters.
As for makeup, you'll probably see a lot of that here (DDF does high end glamour porn) but it's generally not overdone. Otherwise, I think you'd be satisfied with the site given how much content they have (clips available on vids, some anal (depending on which sub-sites you join) and a good variety of stuff to ogle.
|
10-17-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
527
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Just wanted to say sweet review there Exotics. Also, I'm glad to see that they still have everything under one roof. I sort of expected this offer to be a passing fad from them but it's still here. Something I'm going to have to check out in the New Year definitely.
|
12-30-09 11:57am
|
Reply
528
|
Defloration.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Thanks for the comment here. I had come across this site in some tgp sites and was wondering if it was any good. I think I'll save my money.
|
05-08-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
529
|
Denude Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Great review as always. I'm guessing by the site name and review that this is pretty soft (no lez, no toys, etc.)? Just wanted to double check with da' man before considering their trial.
|
04-06-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
530
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Reply
In that case I would post comment here at PU about that site as well (assuming it is listed here, I didn't check). That's in part what PU is all about, giving others warning so they don't make the same mistakes we do :)
|
07-09-09 07:57pm
|
Reply
531
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Comment
Yet another reason to avoid all these so called adult hookup sites. I don't think any of them (this one, Adultfriendfinder, etc.) have reviewed well at all here and the amount of time, effort and cost involved makes going out and paying for an escort seem like the most cost effective route. This one though sounds more like a scam than the others.
|
07-08-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
532
|
DL Assistant
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Thanks for the review here. I've seen some of the crystal lizard stuff on tgp sites and wondered how good the content was (I realize crystal and diamond lizard are 2 separate entities). Good review.
|
06-03-08 03:51pm
|
Review
533
|
DogFart
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ 4,000 interracial hardcore scenes spread over 23 sites covering a variety of niches. All scenes have pics and vids.
+ Bills through Epoch, easy cancellation.
+ Easy navigation and it works.
+ Most pics are 1000x1600 or better and come in zips.
+ Tags work and model directory seems complete.
+ Lots of fetish content (cuckold, bukkake, glory hole, etc.) if you're into that. Probably about 20% anal content overall.
+ Wide selection of girls (teen to 50+) and includes porn stars to amateurs.
+ Production value is mostly good.
+ Good file naming for organizing downloads. |
| Cons: |
- Updates are spotty. Only 3-4 updates per week over the whole network, some sites go months without updates. Only a couple of sites update once a week.
- Late coming to the party with HD pics and 1080 vids not starting until 2013. Site also claims it shoots in 4k HD but there are no 4k downloads available.
- Some sites are very repetitive in theme and shoots.
- Lots of racism and misogyny, especially in the earlier years. The whole IR thing is overplayed to me.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Site is a bit slow. I never had download speeds cross the 900 kb/sec range.
- Had some issues with the inbrowser video player on a few sites - couldn't jump ahead in the video playback, had to reload the page a lot in order to get it to work.
- Almost all scenes shot using a single camera and mic which is a bit disappointing at times (Show me what's going on!).
- Large watermark in lower right hand of pics regardless of what it covers up, a few sites use multiple watermarks. |
| Bottom Line: |
As the most interesting man in the world says, "I don't always spend $30 a month on porn, but when I do, it's spent on watching on monster black dongs doing unspeakable acts with caucasian women". If you haven't guessed it already, the main theme here is interracial porn featuring black men who ... well, let's just say that to call them "well endowed" is like saying the MVP of your favorite sports league has "some talent".
Blacks on Blondes is the headliner with scenes going back 12 years but the main focus of this 23 site network is having white women encountering these black goliaths. The remaining sites have only started in the last 5 to 6 years. As noted above, there is a fair amount of cuckold, bukkake and other fetishes explored, some (watchingmydaughtergoblack, watchingmymomgoblack, and cuckoldsessions) more watchable than others (theminion is almost unwatchable - literally "food porn"). There are also a few sites with feature girls dedicated to shagging only black men (SpringThomas, RuthBlackwell, etc). Overall, a good mix of girls in terms of age and looks and situations although I will echo the point one recent comment made in that the quality of talent seems to be ebbing a bit in the last year.
PICS: All scenes have pics with zip downloads. The earliest pics are just too small (only applies to blacksonblondes). The 1000x1600 sizes appear in 2007 and the 2000x3000 in 2013. Most sets come in with about 150-200 pics. As noted, the watermark(s) are unnecessary and too big. Most pics appear to be screencaps which means you have to deal with some blurry shots or overly narrow focus fields which is par the course now a days. In probably 80-90% of the scenes, the vids have more content than the pics.
VIDS: Current vids have 4 mp4 download options (1080 being tops), and one large wmv file. All scenes have in browser viewing with a popup showing what action happens when along the play bar. 1080 doesn't start until 2013 and 720 starts about 2007. Have to admit that even the earliest videos looked good on my screen. I had no issues with downloading but I don't use a DL manager. There are no 4k vids which are advertised on the home page.
NAVIGATION: It's easy and it works. You can only search by each site but that works for me. They have a page jump function for each page on a site and you get 5 scenes per page. Model directory is complete and covers the whole site. Tags are a bit general as usual but work.
OVERALL: This was mostly enjoyable site with decent content. One main beef is that, with the exception of the most recent year or two, when you put 2 or more brothers together in a scene they can't stop yammering on about whatever. The early blacksonblondes shoots also feature an off camera "interviewer" who won't shut up either.
A lot of the sites are overly repetitive in their shoots. For example, in Interracial pickups you know the guy will start with the guy driving in his car talking about the weather and what positions each girl will do when and how the photo shoot will look. Not a deal breaker but annoying after a while.
However, if you do get bored with the scenes, just read the scene comments. Between the outright misogyny, racism, and juvenile directing hints you'll feel like the most enlightened person on the planet. A lot of the shoots (especially the earlier ones) overly emphasize the whole IR thing and there's generous use of the "N" word by everyone involved. As with most sites, when you start getting multiple guys on a girl, the girl quickly becomes nothing more than a sex object. Not unexpected given the nature of this network but outdated and overplayed in my book.
There is webcam advertising on every page and the few "extra sites" aren't worth looking at. There are also 2 gay sites associated with the network but I didn't check them out.
Despite my complaints I still give this place an 85. Tons of content in various niches, lots of girls from smoking hot to totally not (most models are attractive) and generally good production value. I downloaded more than I thought I would going in. Probably one of the better IR sites out there but if you're not sure if that's something for you then at least you know what you're getting into. |
|
11-19-15 03:43pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
534
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Hadn't heard about sites doing the whole "double thing" before. Sounds interesting in concept but, as you noted, not sure I really want to be dl'ing multiple copies of the same scene. It'd be kind of cool if some other sites (21stsextury or DDF) went this route though.
|
12-19-11 03:42pm
|
Reply
535
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
It's been a while since I was at a 21st sextury site and recall that their pic sizes were pretty good. Just wondering what size the pics are coming at now and how about how many you get in a set since I'm thinking about signing up again?
|
01-28-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
536
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
That's cool. I went back and read your review on DP Overload after I posted my reply so I understand a bit better the goings on here. Thanks for clarifying the situation.
|
08-05-08 11:18am
|
Reply
537
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
So, just to make clear, the admin staff at 21st Sextury gave you free access based upon your review? If so, doesn't it seem like they're trying to "buy" a good review from you?
|
08-05-08 10:56am
|
Reply
538
|
Dream Stash
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
I really dug this site years ago. Yes, it has stopped updating and so I don't go any more. Haven't been a while but sounds like they've downgraded the pics and removed some of the sets. Too bad as I thought it was one of the best POV sites around.
|
03-17-09 09:19pm
|
Comment
539
|
DVD Box
(0)
|
|
06-21-08 04:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
540
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree with Wishdj and PinkPanther. I was a member about a year ago and remember thinking that this site could have been so much better. A lot of the material is getting pretty dated and there was a lot of airbrushing. I would not recommend joining unless you are a fan of Earl or a fan of porn stars from about 5 to 10 years ago.
|
04-08-08 09:27pm
|
Reply
541
|
Enigmatic Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU. However, you're going to need to put more effort into your reviews if indeed this is not just a spam posting. Giving a site a "100" is going to get you grief. Giving a "100" without any detail in your analysis is not really helping anyone out who might see your reviews in the future. I hope you take the time to come back and edit your review otherwise you're going to get a lot more negative trust ratings than you're already starting to get.
|
02-25-09 02:35pm
|
Reply
542
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
For me the content got pretty repetitive pretty fast. The same basic setup and a lot of the same or similar looking models. The pic and video size and quality is average. Some of the sites with this company don't update or recycle updates I've noticed (at least in the past they haven't). If you've never been, the trial is probably worth it but for not for the long haul. Again, it's been a while since I've been so things may have changed.
|
08-06-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
543
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
While I haven't ever joined this site I have joined other sites in the past that belong to the parent company without problems. I checked it using the ol' crappy standby Internet Exploder browser and got no warnings and my antivirus don't tell me anything was wrong either. Don't know if this helps or not.
If you've never been a member of this site or similar ones run by this company the content for me has been disappointing and I don't intend to go back although if you've never been and can find a decent a trial price it might be worth it then.
|
08-05-09 04:30pm
|
Reply
544
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Hillarious (and very good) review there Drooler. $25 for one darkly lit nude scene? Makes me think there is still hope for my pseudo on line pornstar dreams ... $25 a month to see some average mostly clothed white guy staring at his computer and downloading actual nude porn. Seems like a bargain in comparison to this site.
|
07-28-08 11:57am
|
Reply
545
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Just wanted to say thanks to a webmaster for being honest here at PU. A lot of times webmasters seem to get pretty defensive but I like the fact that you admit this is a business. Hell, if I was running a big site I'd probably put out a clone or two myself.
|
07-17-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
546
|
Euro Girls On Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
doomsday's Review
Hey Doomsday, just wanted to say welcome to PU; we're always happy to see new reviewers here. Good first reviews. We, or at least me, always like more details but not a bad effort. Hope to see more from you soon.
|
08-19-09 08:17pm
|
Review
547
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Good $10, 5 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Daily Updates (1 scene or set per day)
+ Pics go up 2300x3500 with multiple sizes and multiple zip formats
+ Full preview allowed before joining
+ HD movies (HD in quality but not size)
+ Good search function, easy navigation |
| Cons: |
- Nonoriginal content
- No more bonus sites
- Some pic sets get grainy in largest sizes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that has loads of potential but can't quite get there in terms of the final score.
This is probably more of a pic site than a movie site which is fine by me. There are about 375 picture sets which have 140 to 200 pics ranging from 1000 to 3500 pix (you can zip in three different sizes). The size is great but some sets get grainy. About 20% are hardcore, 15% lesbian and the rest are solo. Pics also have a slideshow function.
The vids, about 80, have a few percent more hc scenes than the photos. They come in at 640x480 with a 4200 stream rate (my download speeds were generally good). The quality is very good. You can download clips or full scenes (full scenes come it around 500mb sizes) and they run about 20 to 30 minutes.
They offer daily updates, good search and a calendar look showing the updates of the day for each month if you like. Navigation is easy. They also offer a great preview where you can look at the vids available and every thumbnail in every photoset.
With so much great stuff why not a great score? The answer is the nonexclusive content. They rely heavily on Viv Thomas material so if you've been a member there you've seen a lot of this. I recognized almost all the hc sets from Viv and other sites like Twistys and Karupspc and Sexybabes. Most of the softcore looked familiar as well. Some of the pics didn't stand up to being enlarged so big and some colors got a bit fatigued as well in the process.
Given that this is a Newsensations spinoff I think the score could have been helped by tossing in a couple of NS sites as bonuses. The bonus sites mentioned by earlier reviews now seem to be gone.
If this site had some original content and/or some decent bonus material I'd be pushing the score to near 90 but the nonexclusive nature hurts in this case.
If you haven't been to Vivthomas or some of the more mainstream porn sites recently then I think this is good site to visit. For those who have I think it's a question if you want the bigger pics (Vivthomas doesn't put his pic resolution as high as they do here) or to update your collection. I don't see any reason to stay for longer than the trial given the lack of exclusive material unless you don't really have any of this material. |
|
11-06-08 12:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
548
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
|
07-29-14 03:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
549
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
|
05-02-13 12:08pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
550
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Balibalo's Comment
Good to know. The did a similar site about 18 months ago (all teen content amassed from other DDF sites) and that didn't seem to last too long. Don't know why they got the sudden desire to get back into the same situation unless there's some untapped market they're thinking they might reach. However, I think they're just going to cheese off more DDF fans than get new subscribers unless the price is a lot lower than their usual $30+ a month.
|
06-05-09 05:29pm
|
