| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
Hard Caning
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
Maybe they need a hard caning now ;)
|
11-06-08 06:37pm
|
Reply
577
|
Hardcore Max
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Oh yeah, no way in hell Max is operating out of the US any more. I'm betting that Cyprus doesn't have a legal convention with the US either, good luck getting money to pay off his fines from his newest internet venture. Either that or he sold / licensed his material to another company (I see German Goo Girls is one of the sites affiliated with the parent company) and is going to let them take any heat from it.
|
04-08-09 10:02pm
|
Comment
578
|
Hardcore Max
(0)
|
|
04-08-09 09:37pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
579
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
Thanks for the feedback; that's one of the reasons I like this site. I'm not going to comment on the PaulMarkhamteens comparison as I'm currently in the doghouse with Paul Markham over a review I recently gave his site.
Overall, and I've seen this on other sites as well, I'd have to say that if you're going to focus on shooting younger models you need to work on bringing them out of their shell because they just don't have the experience to put on an entertaining show. I think that webmasters would find that if they have girls that are into "it" then their websites would also generate more $$ too.
|
04-14-08 12:11pm
|
Review
580
|
Hegre Art
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography
- Mostly attractive girls from all over the world
- Good customer service
- No DRM
- Multiple photo download options
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Video quality is average
- Most of the models are not very "livley"
- Wish there were more models to choose from |
| Bottom Line: |
As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice.
As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times.
I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative.
All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again. |
|
04-08-08 09:56pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
581
|
Her First Anal Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
This is one I'd stay away from. They are part of the "usual suspects" lineup of 3rd party content that appear as bonus sites on a lot of other sites. From what I've seen on their bonus offerings the quality isn't that hot (clips only and smallish pics) and neither are the chicks. I've gotten a few keeper sets but nothing that could reasonably amount to an interest in actually joining the site.
|
12-26-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
582
|
Her First Big Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
Hey, thanks for the good review on this one. I was a member there years ago. They had decent sized pics then, just wondering what size the pics come in at now and if there are zips.
Pity about the streaming vid thing. My take is that streaming is going to replace DRM as the next big net limitation ... giving us all something new to beef about, especially when they make streaming harder to download.
|
12-02-08 07:35pm
|
Reply
583
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for taking the plunge here and checking it out. I'm assuming the content is mixed, sort of like the Suze.net site -- in other words updates vary between solo, HC and lez? Doesn't sound like I'll be adding this to my list of places to go anytime real soon.
|
07-31-09 03:15pm
|
Reply
584
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I wouldn't say that they're entirely going in that direction but it seems to me like they're "shading" more in that direction. I do wish they'd get back to more nylon related stuff though.
|
01-27-11 11:40am
|
Review
585
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either) |
| Cons: |
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email). |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site. |
|
01-26-11 02:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
586
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
|
01-24-11 03:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
587
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the info here. I'll be back to HL&F in the next few months. For one, I'm sort of glad that they're offering more b/g scenes but they do have premium softer stuff too.
|
07-06-09 11:30am
|
Comment
588
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
|
07-02-09 09:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
589
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
hiker's Review
Hey Hiker, glad to see a new face here at PU. Like a lot of us, we started posting after feeling that we got ripped off by a site. I'll just echo the comments from the previous reply, in that while you're experience may not have been good we always like more info so that others can make a fully informed decision.
|
10-12-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
590
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
billyinc1's Review
Dude, just wanted to say welcome to PU but that you need to put a little more effort into your review(s). By your account, this site has no flaws so why didn't you score it at "100"? You don't have any site facts in your review. In fact, your review reads more like a comment in that your review really has nothing in it other than the fact you like the site.
|
04-22-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
591
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Sorry, that may have been me on the "no DRM" thing that I saw posted on an adult business site that I happened to come across about a week ago. They had a headline saying that Hustler was quitting the DRM thing so I posted a comment here on that primarily to see if that was true or not. Apparently not but not sure when it is/was supposed to take effect but so far, no dice.
|
01-25-09 10:30pm
|
Comment
592
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
01-22-09 01:16pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
593
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Agreed, good review. I've always been impressed with the quality I've seen on tgp sites but the high price has sort of held me back. Should they offer a discount I'll probably be there but not at $35 a month for a nonhardcore site.
|
11-25-08 02:48pm
|
Reply
594
|
Indecent Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this Denner. I also saw the TBP trial and was thinking about joining; maybe I'll reconsider. How is the picture quality on the sites there?
|
12-23-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
595
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Hey Exotics: Just wondering what the current pic size is right now. I was a member a few years ago and just curious if they've boosted their pic dimensions at all.
|
02-17-10 03:51pm
|
Comment
596
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
|
04-21-08 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
597
|
iPink Visual Pass
(0)
|
|
05-15-09 12:54pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
598
|
Jewish Porn Girl Sex
(0)
|
|
01-13-10 03:36pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
599
|
Just 18
(0)
|
|
04-08-09 08:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
600
|
Just Teens Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Have to agree with Pat that based upon the tour pages it looks like this mostly content you can find cheaper and in better quality at sites like 18xgirls and teenmegaworld. Don't want to dampen your spirits though, it's great to have new members adding reviews here and first reviews of sites are always appreciated.
In the future, if you question whether or not to join a site or wonder what the content is like you can always add a comment about the site (click the comment button, not review button) and someone will usually have something to say about it.
|
07-26-14 12:03pm
|
