| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I see from the reviews that there's a silent drm on this site. As I'm more of a picture guy I'm wondering how big the pics are and about how many photo sets there are across the site. Thanks.
|
05-14-09 11:46am
|
Comment
502
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
|
05-13-10 02:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
503
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Just curious, about what size are the pictures now and are the new sizes only for the current material or did they also boost the resolution on their older material too?
|
04-19-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
504
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Thanks for the review on this site; good review and funny by the way. I had joined years ago and was recently thinking about checking it out again. Sounds like the site has kept on going strong. I'll probably pass at the moment given the smallish pic sizes and premium pricing.
P.S. Congrats on winning the $100 raffle, you beat me out (I got the $50). Who knew ordinary Joe's writing about porn could make it big ;)
|
04-15-08 06:43pm
|
Reply
505
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Colorclimax quit producing all content in the early or mid 90's. Ever since they've been online all they do is recycle their old content. So, don't expect to ever see anything new from them. I sort of like their stuff though, it's pretty high quality considering how old it is and I would still recommend it for a one time join if someone is into older porn.
|
06-16-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
506
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Colorclimax was a European print magazine that went out of business years ago. The reason they don't open up their archieve is because they want repeat customers/billing. Thus, they just endlessly recycle their content, putting content up and then taking it down only to have it reappear later as an update. It's not a bad site if you like 70's and 80's porn (I joined several times years ago) but don't expect anything new from them.
|
07-30-09 10:59am
|
Reply
507
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was a member here about 2 years ago and several times before that. I know that they recycle their content and don't do new shoots any more. They keep their shoots up for a while then take them back down. They are simply making a living off of their past (nothing wrong with that). So, my guess, not having been there lately, is that the "new" stuff is simply material taken down and reposted.
|
04-17-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
508
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let's be real for a minute. 5 new reviews, all in the 90', in one day. The site itself is plain. According to TheBestPorn it has 7 videos and about 200 photo sets. The webmaster is defending himself left and right after never having appeared on this site before. Did I mention that the people posting the highly regarded reviews here have never posted reviews before? This is nothing but a con game so let's leave it at that and move on to more important stuff like how long it's been since I've cleaned my belly button lint.
|
10-02-11 10:33pm
|
Review
509
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up |
| Cons: |
--- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:
PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.
VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.
THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.
I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.
Now, how come I never meet these women in real life? |
|
09-16-10 04:30pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
510
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Cooter37's Review
First off, welcome to PU. Unfortunately that't the good news. The bad news is that if you want your reviews to be helpful to other PU users you need to include a lot more information in them. Some site specifics (amount of content, vids / pics, search engine, etc.) would be greatly appreciated. As it is, no one is going to take your review of "99" seriously with the information you have provided so far.
|
04-22-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
511
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
All I can is thanks for taking one for the PU team.
|
08-11-09 11:30am
|
Reply
512
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I think most of the high profile models who seem to keep up do it with the help of other companies/producers (Club Nella, Club Sandy, Eve Angel etc. get a lot of support help and casting with other models). I could see where doing it one your own would become a major pain but if you want the revenue you have to keep it up -- the fans of individual models expect more than what they get from the mega sites.
|
06-06-08 02:57pm
|
Reply
513
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Very good review here, keep it up. It seems like a lot of these single model sites are just not keeping up. The actress seems to get into it for a little while, usually just after the launch, and then let it languish.
|
06-03-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
514
|
Cum Fiesta
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Review
It's a decent network but what just cheeses me off is their lack of interest in photos. 800x600? If it's 1998 that's fine but not any more. They do have an unbeatable backlog of vids to choose from though which is attractive.
|
12-23-08 03:39pm
|
Comment
515
|
Cute Couples
(0)
|
|
02-03-10 12:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
516
|
Cute Couples
(0)
|
|
05-27-08 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
517
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
|
04-27-10 05:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
518
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'll post something after I get access to it in about. However, I should note that I don't get access for another 42 days (apparently this is one of the sites I have to wait two months for before I get). Anyway, it is mostly softcore and it does appear to have lots of fresh faced girls on it. Not a top notch site but at the price levels ($15 US after one month and $10 US thereafter) if you had any inclination at all to check it out then it would be worth staying around in my book.
|
03-04-10 03:04pm
|
Review
519
|
Cuties In Stockings
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks |
| Cons: |
- Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.
Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.
Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.
The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.
This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.
It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.
I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times. |
|
03-18-09 10:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
520
|
Cuties In Tights
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
521
|
Dads and Babe
(0)
|
|
07-31-08 08:16pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
522
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I've been trying to figure out what identity Mofos has in comparsion to Brazzers? I assumed Brazzers was just branching out to generate more revenue, just rebranding their stuff for the new place.
|
04-03-09 04:07pm
|
Reply
523
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
I have to admit, yours is the most original mathematical scoring system on a review that I've seen so far. Thanks for the heads up on this; I sort of figured it didn't have much new to offer.
|
11-20-08 10:06pm
|
Reply
524
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I'm currently a member and I can tell you that Horny Milfs and Inked Girls are just compilation sites from existing DDF material (a niche site for those who are looking for this type of content without digging through all the tags).
Fuck in HD is a separate site (looks like a mix of DDF, teenmegaworld and some other stuff) and not included in the membership. Same goes for DDF Adventures, Girls in Love and DDF Cams. All four of these are listed under "Other DDF Sites" on my site page.
With my membership I count 9 sites plus the two niche (aka "repeat") sites for a total of 11.
|
12-21-15 03:47pm
|
Comment
525
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
04-30-13 06:32pm
Replies (1)
|
