| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I almost did the 3 day trial but after digging through the tour I decided it wasn't worth it. Small pix and not a lot of them in each set. No HD movies. Etc. I have to agree the site is not quite sure what it wants to be but whatever it "is" needs updating. While I agree she is hot what content that is coming out seems to be pale as opposed to content that could / should be coming out.
Forgot to note that "yes" there are pix and video from 3rd party sites that she has appeared on.
|
07-07-13 07:54pm
|
Review
477
|
Brandi Love
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Good price (7 day full access trial for $10)
+ Decent amount of content (about 100 pic sets, 100 vids and 25 webcam shows)
+ Hot MILF with great legs and tight bootie who covers the whole range of porn
+ Weekly live webcam
+ All vids and cam shows have description of what happens |
| Cons: |
- Cross sales on signup page
- No zips on pic sets
- No update schedule and unsure how often it really does update
- Video quality average at best
- Navigation needs work
- Lots of advertising and cross promotions |
| Bottom Line: |
I usually avoid single model sites but decided to chance it here with Brandi and her banging hot bod. Brandi is an amateur MILF in late 30's early 40's who has a fitness body that most men wish their wife or GF had. She covers the whole gambit on her site, from HC to lez to fetish to swinger to toys to uniform to glam .... She does put a lot of time into her site but overall the site needs some work.
Pics: This is where the navigation sucks. She has a pic page with about 10 different categories. However, clicking on a category takes you into the same big archieve that you have to page through. Just one thumbnail to show what it's in the gallery so you have to look at each one to see what's really there. No page jumps, just forward and backward. No zips either. Pic sizes are all over the board from worthless and tiny screen caps to 2300x3500 in your face puntang depending on the set (you don't know until you click). Most of the pics are of good quality but I wish there was more for each set. You get at most 100 in a set and often only about half that. Some sets are continuations of earlier sets but that's not really clear until you get into them. Cropping is not one of her strong points either although part of that problem is that she uses a lot of stills from an HD camcorder for the photo gallery.
Videos: There about 100 now. You get four download choices (who the hell still downloads "Real" vids?). No scenes, just full vids. Problem is that most vids are 380x280 and of amateur quality. I wasn't expecting professional stuff as this is an amateur site but the quality still lacked for me. The webcams were OK but they are also fairly small sized. Brandi, boost your vid sizes and get a tripod if the operator can't hold the cam still! You get about 30 HC vids and the rest are solo, lez and in a few other categories.
The webcam archieve is pretty good and with about a dozen HC cam shows out of 25 total shows. Each show runs about a half hour.
She does do a good job of promoting herself. She has a blog but it's loaded with cross sale stuff and isn't deeply personal, mostly chat about her swinger lifestyle. She is big on the swinging lifestyle and has a lot of links for those who are into that.
There is some teaser "friends" stuff from other amateur sites but you don't get anything but a few very shot vids and small pic sets so I just call that advertising.
Brandi does enjoy what she's doing and that does come through in the pics and vids. So, I give her an "A" for effort. The execution could be better by enlarging the picture sets, fixing some of the dead links, improving video size and quality and getting some zips done on the pics. It's not a bad site but there's nothing that will keep me here beyond the trial period. |
|
05-06-09 06:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
478
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
|
04-23-09 03:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
479
|
Brazilian Transsexuals
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
Just wanted to say "sweet review" there GCode.
|
03-10-10 12:32pm
|
Reply
480
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RadioRikRoss's Reply
Sorry but I can't help you there. I've been a member several times over the last 5 or so years so I last downloaded any old content years ago and didn't even really look it this last go around. I'd suggest posting a comment on the "Brazzers" PU page asking your question, I'm sure you'd get a fairly quick reply.
|
08-08-18 12:32pm
|
Review
481
|
Brazzers
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ 8,000 exclusive porn scenes with updates 2x per day across 33 sites (only 17 currently update).
+ A wide variety of porn from teens to milfs, almost all hardcore, featuring most every US porn star you know.
+ 1080 sized vids going back to 2010.
+ Decent navigation though the site is a bit plain by today's standards.
+ In browser video streams are fast and smooth and the scenes have tags where you can jump to the type of action you want.
+ Good sized pics (2500x1660) going back to 2009 and a lot of them (about 500 per scene). All pic sets have zips.
+ Most scenes supply some sort of story line as opposed to the usual gonzo offerings of most sites.
+ Discounts through TBP (I got a $10 per month holiday deal).
+ No DRM or download limits.
+ Professional production standards for most all scenes. |
| Cons: |
- Prechecked cross sale on signup that's not entirely obvious (look at the top of signup page in a separately colored box).
- Uses Probiller for billing which isn't great on support.
- Lots of ads throughout the site.
- Slow downloads at times (don't use Firefox on this site).
- Lots of tats, botox and cosmetic surgery on the talent.
- A lot of overlap on the sites, no real distinction between most of them.
- Pics are basically HD screen shots from the videos so the quality is sometimes iffy. |
| Bottom Line: |
As most everyone knows, Brazzers is a classic hardcore mega porn site that offers something for most everyone at a decent price. The emphasis here leans more towards well known porn stars with big boobs and milfs doing straight sex, anal and most every other position. Not a lot of lesbian, group sex or DP scenes if that's your thing. It's basically your local diner that will fill you up but won't “wow” you. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: All scenes have pics with zips with 2500z1660 sizes going back almost a decade. Pre-2009 sizes drop to 900x600. The in browser viewer for pics is antiquated (can only view pics at 800x530 resolution). You get a ton of pics per scene (usually 500+) which can really means a lot of shots of the same thing. The good thing about all these pics is that if you like softcore photos about one half of the pics per set are the “before” pose shots where the girls start fully dressed and then strip down to nothing so you can build you own softcore galleries if you want. The action pics are screen grabs which are usually good quality but some scenes are way too dependent on a macro / fisheye lens setting which warps all but the center of the image and bad cropping (scenes where the models have no arms / legs). As usual, the videos typically show more action content than the pics.
VIDS: I liked the in browser options for vids. You can play them at various speeds (.5 to 2x) and numerous resolution (phone to 1080). For the last several years, each scene has jump tags where you can click on the type of action you want to see and the video will jump to that part. Streams were fast and smooth. I had pretty good download speeds for me (1-3 mb/sec) but this varied on time of day; during evening “prime time” things really got slow to the point I gave up a few times. MP4 is the main video download format and they look good. I downloaded a lot in 480 resolution to save space and they look fine on my 22” monitor.
NAV: Navigation on a site this big works best if you go site by site as opposed the ginormous main update page where pagination becomes an issue. The individual sites look outdated but at least most everything works. There is a model directory which seems complete. You can also tag scenes, save favorite scenes, leave comments and rate scenes. They have a search function based on general categories or tags which seems more inclusive than most sites but still isn't close to complete.
I will note that I like Firefox but even with the most up to date version getting pages to load was terribly slow at any time of day. I resorted to Chrome which worked a lot faster here.
Probiller is not my favorite processor. You can only cancel via phone or email so plan on canceling at least a few days in advance. Customer service is a bit spotty too.
There is a certain lack of male talent here. There are only a handful of guys that appear in most scenes so if one or more of them turn you off then there's a lot you may not like.
Personally I'm not into the whole big butt / big breast thing (hell, I even saw butt implants here) “but” (pun intended) there is something for most everyone who likes hardcore. I like that they at least put a story line on almost all the scenes, not as well as other sites but it's an improvement over straight gonzo. The overall scene and production quality is not top end but it's better than average which pretty much sums up the site as a whole. |
|
02-01-18 12:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
482
|
Brazzers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ A boat load of scenes and models (about 4500 scenes)
+ About 8-10 updates per week across a 27 site network
+ Excellent navigation, can search by model, site or across the network
+ All scenes have pics up to 2500x1600 with zips and multiple video options with true 1080 HD on scenes added since late 2009
+ Model directory (with actual info!)
+ Good price at $20 a month (I got in on a special $10 price)
+ Pretty much all hardcore across a variety of genres from teen to milf
+ Excellent production values and usually an attempt to build some story line into the scenes
+ Lots of ability for users to interact on the site (ratings, forum, comments, etc)
+ Good download speeds for me - consistently in the 500 or more MB/sec range across multiple channels |
| Cons: |
- As usual the older content (before mid 2009) lacks in quality (no HD video and only 900x600 pics)
- Tags are inconsistent so not a reliable way to do a comprehensive search
- Only about 14 sites update.
- Their motto might as well be "Home of big tits and bit tatts". The majority of models would make silicon valley envious but there is something for about everyone here except softcore.
- Cross sale on signup and advertising on the site and when you log in
- A slew of "bonus sites" that are just tube quality streaming videos
- Too many pics. Many scenes have over 1000 images which just means endless pics of the same thing.
- Although not really a negative, most all the models here are certified porn stars so if you're looking for fresh meat, you won't find it here.
- Nothing terribly original about the scenes so it can seem a bit stale after a while even across the wide genres they cover |
| Bottom Line: |
It's been almost 5 years since I was last here and I mostly stayed away because of the low quality pics and "bit tit, big ass, bit tattoos" theme that most of the sites focus on. However, I decided to jump in on a $10 a month special through TBP and have to say I was pretty impressed. There's a reason why this in one of the biggest and most popular porn sites out there. Here's the quick low down:
PICS: Older pics (before mid 2009) are only 900 to 1000 by 660. Since then, the size is great and so is the quality. You don't get download options though. My only beef is that there are too many pics with some scenes having over 2500 pics. A few sites have done better keeping them around 200-300 but most updates still have around 800. I'm glad they don't give you too few pics but I really don't need 15 shots of the same thing. With the large pic sizes, some zip files end up being 600 - 800 mb in size which is just unnecessary.
VIDS: As noted, before 2009 the vid quality is average at best. Since then the HD stuff looks really good. You get up to 7 download options (full HD to mobile sized), in browser streaming which works great (very little lag time), screen caps and 1 or 5 minute screen caps which appear just below the video to let you jump to the good stuff. Download speeds were fast and consistent. Vids range from 20 to 50 minutes. I found that I downloaded a lot of "SD mp4" files (lower rez but formatted with HD dimensions) which look pretty good on my 23" monitor and saved on the 2-5 GB full HD size.
NAVIGATION: The more I review and look at porn sites the more I see sites that just grow too big for their original navigation systems and become, at best, a chore to slog through. Since my last join here years ago they have completely revamped their navigation and it freakin' actually works well. Only a few clicks will get you where you want. You can browse through a 1000 pics and with two back button clicks you're out to update page for any site. You can search in various ways except really the tags because they're inconsistent but then I've never seen a really good tag system on a large site.
You can create favorite lists, the sites track the scenes you've looked at that you can easily access and there's lots of opportunity to give feedback and interact if you're into that. The model directory has actual info and lets you follow porn stars.
OVERALL: I'm not really into the big tit slutty porn star thing but I found that I downloaded about 500 photo sets and about 80 vids so I can't say I was disappointed. You got teens, milfs, uniforms, bit butts, big tits, squirting, etc. to choose from so unless you're into softcore or lez you should be able find a few goodies.
Production values since 2009 are great and you get a ton of models.
My negative impressions are mostly minor. A few broking links, the site bogged down my Firefox browser after 2 hours (probably need more ram), and even with all the sites and models the porn does get a little repetitive but then again this is a pretty mainstream porn network.
While I'm not ready to sell out and go sign myself up for life to the silicon boob of the day club I was pretty impressed with the site. If I were to score it just on content and production value it'd only be in the mid 80's but the well thought out navigation and ease of use are some of the best I've seen which bumps up the score to 92. At last, a pleasant surprise. |
|
11-27-13 08:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
483
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Thanks for the heads up. For anyone else interested in jumping into this one, I'll note that there is a prechecked cross sale on the sign up page so be aware.
|
10-31-13 04:41pm
|
Reply
484
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I was trying to be a bit cynical in my post and I guess it didn't quite come off right now that I look at it again. I guess I was under the impression that you could at least stream the HD vids before the six month waiting period expired. If you can't even stream then it is a 100% rip off as opposed to a 90% rip off.
|
06-26-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
485
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I took a quick peek and yup, they advertise 1080 p HD vids. You have to be admit that they don't promise downloads in HD but it's still deceptive marketing. I also see that they are advertising "100% satisfaction guaranteed or money back" on their sign up page. I wonder if that's a scam too or if they're going to dooling out some refunds soon.
|
06-26-09 06:49pm
|
Reply
486
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
Just to let you know they are the same thing. They just use the two names as part of a marketing operation. As for pricing, welcome to the newest porn trend of regional pricing. Being from the states I can't say if you're stuck shelling out 20 pounds or not. I recently got a deal for $10 a month by linking through another site. Good luck hunting down a deal. You might also consider looking for a deal on Mofos.com. That is the newest brazzer's network. It's small at this time but you might find some deals on it. Good luck.
|
12-29-08 11:54am
|
Comment
487
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-20-08 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
488
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for kudos on the review. I just looked and it appears that there's about 320 anal scenes throughout the network. They do a pretty good job of tagging as I don't recall seeing any anal scenes that didn't have the tag but, then again, I don't look at every scene. Either way, if you like it backdoor they do have a good amount of material for you.
|
12-11-08 11:54am
|
Review
489
|
Brazzers
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 22 sites and growing of exclusive hardcore content
+ No DRM, No DL limits
+ Multiple daily updates, nearly 2000 scenes throughout the network
+ Good search function across whole network
+ Very good user interface
+ All scenes have vids and pics (pics have zip)
+ Scenes actually have story lines although acting is, well, about average for pornstars
+ 40 bonus sites (nonexclusive third party movie clips, not really worth it but it's there) |
| Cons: |
- Pics are a bummer coming in at 900x600
- Video quality is just OK
- Too many pics in sets but they're getting better (new stuff has 700-1000 pics per set)
- 8 of the network sites no longer update
- Some minor technical problems
- Quality is only OK but certainly not amateur
- Smallish opaque watermark but it sometimes gets in the way of the action |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed this site 10 mos. ago but recently rejoined and I'm re-reviewing as I was too harsh on my initial take. For the uninitiated, this is a large network focusing on the Sir Mix-a-Lot school of porn (big booty and big busts). I'm not really a fan of the genre but there is enough content to satisfy just about everyone: they have big tit, big butt, anal, teen, interracial, schoolgirl and milf content. For those into American girl booty, silicone and tats, it's probably about the best site around for you.
PHOTOS: I'm a photo guy and so all I can say is that you join here for the vids. For some reason, the "Walmart's of Porn" (Brazzers, Newsensations, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica -- they make their money on volume while the quality is spotty) all seem to go small with the pics (900x600). You get too many landscape shots here with a lot of dead space (hint, turn the camera sideways and zoom in a bit more). What is frustrating here is that some sets have random 1350x900 shots so they obviously know how to make them. Some shots are a bit grainy and out of focus but overall they are OK for the size.
VIDEOS: Vids come in WMV, Mpeg1, Mpeg4, and Ipod/psp formats and have a streaming option. The vids are not hi-def and come in clips or full length. They average about 30 min. long and are about 300-400 megs in size. Screen size is 640x480. Sort of like the pics, sometimes they get too much "dead space" in the shots but for the most part they are well done and entertaining with no talking camera men (yay).
I would say this site has the best user interface I've seen on a porn site. You can rate each scene and post comments. They have a "personal favorites" function too. There is a user forum with a ton of postings although it's mostly "Beavis & Butthead" level commentary. There are discount (tastefully small) ads for other sites with good prices. There is a very good search function with multiple search options available.
I did have some small technical issues: a few browser crashes, some sets had pics that didn't match the thumbnails, some dead links and pages that wouldn't load but most of these were overcome.
As an aside, I was happy to see Nicole Sheridan come out of retirement for a hot new scene here.
I'm scoring this site an 86 for two reasons. The main issue is quality. Like I said, Brazzer's has the Wal-Mart mentality of porn: they produce a lot and have reasonable membership fees with frequent discounts but they skimp on the quality. They're getting better but still have a ways to go. With HD vids and hi-rez pics, I'd put a score of 90 or more on this site. The other reason is that it does get a bit stale. A lot of scenes seem alike, performers appear in multiple genres, and the girls they use are usually not top shelf "hottie" talent.
Like I said, there is enough here for most anyone to get their money's worth for a month. It's not the best site but it's certainly worth a membership to check it out. |
|
12-10-08 10:19pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
490
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Mmmmm, I just snagged this deal about 30 minutes ago. I'll see what I conjur up (play "Jeopardy" theme music while I open a new page).
You are right, it now looks like the $7.50 is now only for the multi-month membership. However, they still have the $10 per month offer going. Here's the url: http://tour.brazzersnetwork.com/tour/?action=home
Hope that isn't a big disappointment. I'll re-edit the comment to reflect this.
|
12-02-08 07:45pm
|
Comment
491
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-02-08 07:27pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
492
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
There's a PU forum discussion thread on this subject if you want to contribute.
|
06-02-08 04:49pm
|
Review
493
|
Brazzers
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of movies and picture sets
- No DRM
- Multiple Updates Monday - Friday
- Numerous pornstars
- Multiple themed sites
- Search options and "Girl" catalog available
- User rating system for the sets
- Zip downloads available |
| Cons: |
- HQ photo sets not very high quality\
- Way too many pictures in sets (1000+ usually)
- Quality varies with older material pretty weak
- Navigation is not very good
- Too many models with bad implants |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a bit old school and I happen to like picture sets over movies so I'm going to focus on the pictures here: also, I think enough has been said about the movie downloads.
Almost all sets have way too many pictures (1000 to 2000) with way too many repeat pics. The sets prior to 2007 are not worth looking at. While they advertise high quality photos they are basically slightly less than full screen and some sets have pics no bigger than screen caps. There are some random large format pictures inserted into some sets. The photo quality varies a lot from good to lousy (these guys need to buy a decent digital camera and learn how to focus the thing).
Having said this I give the site an 80 simply because of the volume of content and the fact that you can get a membership for around $20 at this time. If you are into high quality pictures and content then this probably isn't the site for you. Otherwise it is worth checking out but unless you are really into the "big breast, big butt" genre then it's probably not worth sticking around for more than a month or so. |
|
02-26-08 05:52pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
494
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I would suggest posting this topic about winrar's as a forum thread so more people have the chance to figure this out when they come across them. I haven't heard of them before this so its good info to know.
|
05-06-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
495
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
My trial membership is just expiring here. To let you know, I did the $2.26 two day trial through Bluefantasies.com. When I went to cancel they gave me a special offer to stay of $9.99 per month. That saves you a few bucks if you're still interested in checking it out again.
|
07-15-08 11:03pm
|
Comment
496
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
|
07-15-08 11:00pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
497
|
Buy My Socks
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
This does sound like a slightly different kind of place on the net. You used to see more sites (or at least I did) a few years ago where you could buy lingerie a girl had worn for a scene. Never seen a site developed around buying a specific article of clothing. Frankly, my socks get pretty damn tepid after a day or two, I can't imagine that some girl's feet stink any better after a week. Definitely a fetish niche site / catalog if there ever was one.
|
10-27-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
498
|
Cara's Nylon World
(0)
|
Reply of
marinette's Review
I'll echo what G Code said. Sorry about getting ripped off. However, we usually rely on reviews to see what the general content of a site is and what you get for your membership. Thus, adding some of that info to your review would be welcomed, along side your problem with the custom shoot.
|
03-19-09 02:40pm
|
Comment
499
|
Club Jade Marcela
(0)
|
|
02-19-10 10:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
500
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Review
Thanks for doing a review on this one. I'd been thinking about it but wasn't ready to take the leap without some substantive review coming out. Just curious as to what pixel sizes the photos come in and if the photo sets have zips. Thanks.
|
01-04-09 05:28pm
|
