"Strip, strip, strip, strip, nude". Sounds like these gals would be great at refinishing furniture ;) Maybe that's why their staying clothed, those chemicals can be nasty.
Hey Rizzo, just a quick question. I've been meaning to get back to ATK after not having been a member for a few years. One of the beefs I had last time was the navigation. Sometimes they broke the picture scenes over several sets and you had to go to the model's page if you saw a set you liked to see if there was any more material from the shoot. Is that still going on? Also, are they still doing that goofy break down like "Action Set 86" which you have to click on it to reveal the updates?
Thanks for the tip about paysitediscounts. I haven't been back for a while but, as pic lover, it is in my rotation of sites that I like and I'll probably be back soon. Look forward to your review.
I like the AT sites although I haven't joined them in years (I keep finding a way to put it off). I'm glad to see they decided to network all of their sites. However, it's priced at $99 a month. Really! Most of us don't have that kind of porn budget and even if I did I'd basically be forced to get a DL manager and a big ass external hard drive and just rip the whole damn thing in order to get the content. Way too expensive. Their marketing team needs to come up with a new model on this one.
I posted the $20 a month deal from this other site regarding Met Art a few months ago and then TBP added the discount a few weeks later. I imagine / hope that will also happen here. No since on TBP losing out on revenue streams that other sites are offering and you figure TBP carries more clout than some of these other discount sites.
I don't particularly like "cheating on" PU/TBP either but money is money (from one cheap bastard to another).
While rolling around looking for my next membership deal, I noticed that while ATK Galleria has a TBP monthly discounted price of $25, neither ATK Natural & Hairy nor ATK Exotics has that discount here. If you want to pay $25 a month for either of these two ATK sites you can join through paysitediscounts.com (sorry to the TBP staff if I'm cutting into your revenue stream here :).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ No cross sales on signup, bills through ccbill.
+ Tons and tons of average to good looking amateurs and teens, slightly more US girls than Euro girls. Not many tats and very little silicone.
+ Get to see early and exclusive scenes of starlets before they became famous.
+ Mostly exclusive content (I'd say about 90%).
+ Good download speeds – about 2-3 MB/sec which is good for me.
+ Model directory seems complete.
+ Decent sized photos (1500x1020 or better) for 90% of the sets.
+ Multiple daily updates – usually 7 per day.
Cons:
- Purely a softcore site now, hardcore stopped about 2 years ago.
- Navigation and search are functionally worthless.
- Website design hasn't changed in well over a decade.
- Primarily a photo site due to poor video tags and search function. Though many photo sets feel incomplete.
- Not all pic sets have accompanying vids.
- Most scenes are pretty generic and they get repetitive.
- No secure login on website.
Bottom Line:
TK Galleria originally stood for Amateur and Teen Kingdom and was a small site I occasionally went to when I first started being an online porn hound over 15 years ago for interesting amateur content. In another fit of nostalgia, I decided to venture back in time and see what was new since I was last there over a decade ago. In short, “nothing is new” which is not really a good thing.
The website looks like it did years ago which is not good when you got thousands of scenes. What they do is post daily updates and then about once or twice a month they group all the newest updates into galleries, each of which has multiple subsets, and post the galleries in numerical order. This is where the problems start.
Beginning with photos, they have photos split into hardcore and softcore galleries, although it doesn't matter since the content is the same for each. If you want to download a hardcore photo gallery it's not uncommon to find that the scene has been split up. For example, you might have to search the following categories to find all the pics from a scene: action, blowjob, foot fetish and a pose file. In short, the only way to functionally go through the site is to go model by model because all these subcategories can be split into multiple categories in multiple galleries for a single shoot. The downside is that if you only want certain types of scenes, you have too look through all the models to find what you want. This is due to poor or inconsistent tagging or nonexistent tagging (earliest scenes). It's only been in the last few years that the tagging has been better but with content going back to 2006 that excludes a lot of scenes. As an example, the site has 359 “action” scenes listed (meaning m/f hardcore), when in truth that covers about 25% of the hardcore content. Also, be aware that the starlets name used on this site may not match her name on other sites although the big stars do seem consistent.
With movies, it gets worse. If you click on the movie link you a 370 page list of movies in order of release. If you search by tags, know that there is only a single tag per movie (example, “toys” or “action”) so that's not much help. Again, model by model is the only way to go if you want to find anything beyond generic listings. The oldest vids have no descriptors or anything to indicate what's in them, just a model name with download options and sizes. They seem to have made the leap to HD around 2013 but there is very little 1080 and no 4k. You often don't know if you're getting 720 or 1080 until you actually download the video and look at it. Download options are mostly limited to mobile, standard and hd. For recent movies the stream function is smooth and has multiple resolution options and you can jump. For older movies you have to wait for the scene to load before jumping ahead.
While the production values are good there is nothing overly inspired or fresh here. They outsource all their production and have a stable of regular contributor producers. That said, things can get repetitive since some photographers shoot everything with the same few backgrounds with the exact same poses every time, especially with the hardcore.
If you're into softcore amateur photography and want to find some gems, it's not a bad site if you are willing to hunt and peck your way through tens of thousands of scenes. I did download a fair number of photo sets but I know that I'm going to have to piece together a lot of separate files in order to create a "full set" for my purposes. The reality is that this is a site that's been running behind the times for a long time and with the amount of content they have the cracks are really starting to show. Other sites do a better job with organization and have better production values so I can't really recommend it other than maybe a one off membership.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
++ $2.75 2 day full access trial through TBP
++ Newest pix go up 4,000 pixels though most stop at 3,000.
++ Daily updates for photo sets (about 1300 photo sets and 600 vids on main site)
++ Years of material on site(s)
+ Generally decent professional photo and lighting work
+ All photosets have zip functions and you can zip in 1k, 2k, or 3/4k mode
+ About 100 or so 1280x720 vids with decent download speeds
+ Access to 8 other sites
+ No DRM limits
+ Uses major billing companies
+ Small watermarks on pics and vids
+ Video options include full scene, clips and streaming
+ Has a detailed search function and a model directory with some bio material
+ Has a support and FAQ section
Cons:
-- Nonexclusive content
-- Not a site for hardcore fans
-- The bonus sites no longer update
-- Quality really drops once you go back a few years in both pics and vids.
- Cross sales on sign-up page
- Navigation could use some work
- Only a couple of screen caps showing video contents (needs more)
- Have to type in password info for each site (and you get some long randomly generated password when you join)
- WMV only file option for downloading vids
- Vids only update once or twice a week
Bottom Line:
I last joined this site about 5 years ago and decided to to the trial option to see what's changed. In short, not much and that's not necessarily a good thing. There really isn't anything to not like about it but it is a mostly softcore nonexclusive content site (if you like your action hardcore, skip this network) that mostly left me feeling "meh".
PICS: It's nice to see a site that lets you zip in multiple sizes. As noted above, the newest stuff goes up to 4000 pixels however some pixelation occurs at this level on a few sets. The downside is that the quality drops to about 2k sizes when you get to early 2009 and rapidly drops to 1k sizes thereafter. All pics come up in a separate screen. Most of this is stuff that you've seen before and not necessarily a models best offerings.
VIDS: Good download speeds and about 100 newer HD vids. Bad news is that once you get past the HD sizes, the vids fairly quickly drop to 480x320 and the quality of the older stuff is average at best. If you like HC there are only about 40 HC vids in total (1 in HD). Even though I have high speed, the streaming stuff was only OK I had problems jumping forward on some of the streams.
OTHER: It does have a good and mostly complete search engine but it's not entirely intuitive (it took me a few minutes to figure out how to find all the HC vids). Jumping around to different pages requires some clicking too. It's not bad (better than some other good sites) but it does need a few tweaks like adding "softcore", "lez" and "HC" categories, etc.
All the bonus sites stopped updating at least a year ago so they don't really have anything to offer assuming you've been around the porn block a time or two. The pic size and video quality on those sites is mostly second rate by today's standards.
TBP gave this site a "87" score which I can't justify. It's nonexclusive content and once you go back to early 2009 the quality starts to rapidly drop off. It is mostly softcore and, as I noted, these aren't what I would consider the models best work. For me, Twistys, VivThomas, Teendreams and others do a better job with this genre of site than Babelicious does. When I was last a member here I thought the site held up pretty well in comparison to what was going on at the time. Not so much any more. It's not a rip-off by any means but others do it better now.
... and when I say "quick review" I really mean it here. The only pro's are that the photo sets come with zips (and they are OK to good sized); you can join for $5 on 3 day full access trial; and they bill through Epoch. Otherwise it's basically nonexclusive porn that's circled the net for years and needs to be carbon dated in order to find out when it was made. Nothing in HD really and most of the vids only come in clips. Navigation and search are OK at best and the model directory is random in it's ordering. You also get a prechecked cross sale.
The only reason I joined is because I'm long in the tooth and some of the photo sets I collected from like 8 - 12 years ago were of poor quality or just too small for my larger screen (they seemed good on my small crt monitor at the time). So, I spent a few hours just downloading zips of sets that I wanted to upgrade or rediscover and moved on. Sites like Twisty's have a lot of this old stuff but some of the material here is of better quality and all the pic sets here have zips. I made no attempt to download vids.
Basically, this site served it's limited purpose for me but I knew what I was getting into before hand. For anyone else, just save the $5 and move along. If I had to score it, I'd give it a 71 or so just for the amount of content that it has. End of story.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Exclusive content that updates 5x a week.
+ Good $10, 30 day membership through TBP.
+ Great 2500 x 1700 pics with zips and true 1080 HD vids with good download speeds. 4 DL options for vids including mobile device sized. Also streaming available with good speeds and ability to jump within a scene.
+ Smallish watermarks
+ Attractive girls (18 - 30 range) with few "enhancements". A good mix between porn stars and more unknowns, at least to me.
+ A unique site in terms of the artistic and hardcore factors it tries to combine.
+ A good mix of content (about 40% HC, 40% solo, and 20% lez).
+ User ratings and comments sections and social media connections.
Cons:
- Tags / search engine is poor.
- Navigation needs an overhaul.
- Some ads on main page and when logging in.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- The "artistic" feel the site is trying to convey gets lost with bad lighting, bad composition and iffy camera / cropping work.
- Very few positions shown for all scenes.
- Has a model directory but with very little info.
- You get timed out somewhat quickly and there are capcha's every time you log in.
- A fair amount of photoshopping and post production effects going on.
- More complicated than usual cancellation process. Web based cancel system doesn't seem to work (call or use email -- aka: don't wait until the end before trying to cancel). Also, must cancel at least 7 days before end of 30 days to keep from getting rebilled.
Bottom Line:
This is my first voyage into the world of "heartcore" / "lovecore" figuring it looked like it had great quality and would be something different. True, it was different. You won't find anal, dp's, gagging and the like here which is fine by me. I'd like to think that years of overexposure to gonzo porn and too much degrading porn (sort of the default it seems) has made me so jaded to my inner sensitive new age guy. However, even using that standard of measure this site just didn't seem to add up for me. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: The setup looked good. Site has about 125 HC, 56 lez, and 106 solo sets (all have 100 or more pics) and the pics are quite large with zips. However, it quickly broke down. When viewing in browser, the default setting is for a slideshow but you can click to a thumbnail layout. If you click on a thumbnail and go back a page you get the slideshow again. Way too much clicking. You can only view the full sized pics by DL'ing the zips; the inbrowser view is only 800x550. Additionally, you can't even see all the thumbnails and the way the thumbnails are laid out (horizontal as opposed to the usual vertical) you have to use their in browser "forward arrow" which is clunky at best.
There are several photographers working here and most seem to be too damn artsy for their own good. Lots of scenes use natural lighting which results in dark pics and lots of shadows. Also the default seems to be to have the camera in a fixed position which limits the angles and views we're used to seeing.
For hardcore, there is a big focus on foreplay which results in only about 2 positions for actual sex. Given that the camera seems trapped in a fixed position for many scenes the result is that it often feels like your watching a scene from some 1980's Hustler where they couldn't show actual penetration, you just sorta know they're doing it. The lack of positions comes across in the lez and solo stuff too. I guess I like more variety as opposed to just soaking in what's in front of me.
While you get about a lot of pics per set, most of it seems to be a mosaic masterclass - here's a pose but in one frame you get a head, another the torso, another a leg, here's another with some artistic blurriness, etc. The vids are better in this respect but it does gets frustrating regarding the pics. I guess when I think artsy I think of some originality and professional output. A lot of these scenes feel more like someone who knows photography but hasn't shot porn before and isn't quite up to it.
VIDS: About 130 HC, 120 solo, and 60 lez. In browser stream works great and the HD is real HD which looks great ... meaning it's only as great as the way the scene was shot. My main complaint with the vids is their composition and artsy feel which is mostly identical to the issues I outlined in the "pics" section above. A lot of the vids have music in the beginning, some music go throughout.
NAV: Yet another site that built a navigation system when they were small and it no longer works for beans once they've grown. I already groused about the in browser pic issues. The scenes have tags but they are limited. If you search under tags, say "brunette", you'll get a result saying there are 182 scenes. However, it will only bring up 30: there is no way I can see to show them all. The tags are too few (some scenes are mistagged too) and too generic given the number of scenes they have.
If you poke around under their 3 general categories of HC, solo, and lez you'll find that recent updates aren't included. The only way to look at everything is to go through every page of updates - which only lets you jump back or ahead a few pages at a time.
I give this site an 82 because of the quality, the amount of content and the hot girls. However, for me they missed the boat on what they were trying to achieve. This is not porn for women since the focus seems mostly centered on the girls and there is no real talking or kissing-centric theme and the HC ends with a body or facial cumshot. The softer artistic side of porn put forth here seems to get washed over by the crop / framing jobs, low lighting and one position camera angles in many scenes. Those who like artsy porn may be interested in this but I think that for most the HC isn't the hardcore we're used to seeing (and not just the gonzo / rough sex stuff, just the composition in general). The softcore / lez stuff with an artsy feel is done much better by places like HegreArt, MetArt and the like.
I guess I went into this with my hopes set a bit too high. I think this site would work best for someone who digs softcore and art photography and might be looking to try some hardcore. If, like me, you have more of a hardcore background then you're more likely to walk away disappointed.
I think I made an "oops" in my prior comment. I had recently joined, Brazzer's, not Bangbros so you should ignore my comment regarding the condom thing. Haven't been to Bangbros in a few years. Reading and thinking, maybe two great ideas that I should try using together ;)
Thank's for the heads up on this one. I do have a question though. When TBP offers a discount do the websites offering the discount have to let you know when the discount expires or do they just sometimes stop with the discount on their own? Just asking the question because (if I recall correctly) that I've seen posted discounts on TBP where there is no longer full access or the discount doesn't seem to be around any more. I thought the PU community, besides myself, might be interested in knowing how that's supposed to work.
I'm posting this comment here because of Spencer's current review of the BeachhouseXXX on TBP. I recently reviewed the network to which this site belongs (Povporn) giving it a 64 rating. In my opinion, the whole network has a lot of problems and is probably not worth a trial membership. Just offering this comment as a heads up to potentially interested users.
Welcome to PU. Got to admit that your screen name is original. In any case, great first review. I was a member there about 3 years ago and hated the site. One of my biggest peeves, besides some of the ones you mentioned, was the pics where they put the watermark in the middle of a lot of pics (Dude, your stuff isn't that great where any one would want to steal it). Sounds like the Bachelor is living on borrowed time with the site layout and lack of updates; waiting for his parent's basement to open for up him maybe? When I was a member he was in most of the scenes himself. I'm guessing now that he's using a lot of nonexclusive content to fill up the tank. Overall, it still sounds like one to avoid.
I like the idea of a "CIA covet" operation, it definitely has Biblical implications ... sort of what canceling might be like here. This one caught my eye because it has a 3 day trial which is usually enough time to cancel. If this offer is still around in a week or two I might test the waters after digging through the fine print on the sign-up page and confirming that they use a reliable billing processor.
I just noticed that this site and a few others in the network are listed as having a "free" 3 day full access trial. Noticing the monthly rate is an outrageous $40 I'm not exactly leaping on the bandwagon to test drive the trial in case something happens ... free usually translates something bad when it comes to porn trials. Just wondering if anyone has given this one a spin on the freebie?
(Postscript): I went through the sign up process to see what the deal was on this. Apparently in order to cancel you have to send an email to someone with your sign up info in order to cancel. No promises of speedy replies or any confirmation of your cancellation exist. Billing is through a nonstandard 3rd party processing agent. My vote is to take a pass on this unless you like to gamble.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ 345 scenes of exclusive interracial porn
+ All scenes have vids in 1080 HD and pic zips
+ Good download speeds for me (5mb/sec)
+ Good selection of video download options
+ Pic sizes are 2000x3000 pixels
+ Top end production values
+ Mostly top female talent and the focus in on the women
+ Grabbed this membership on a $10 per month TBP holiday special
+ No download limits that I could tell
Cons:
- Only updates 1x per week
- Canceling membership is a pain in the butt
- Prechecked cross sale on signup
- Site doesn't play well with Firefox browser
- No model information
- Tags are pretty generic and don't allow for much of a search
- Site would be better with a network
- Scenes are repetitive in how they're shot and edited
- Fewer photos in the more recent photo sets
- Pagination issues (manually type in page you want to jump to)
Bottom Line:
I took a stab at this interracial site based on the holiday price that was offered a while back. While I can't say I was disappointed I can't say that I was blown away either.
The production values are top end with great lighting and video. I was glad to see that unlike other interracial sites that have a lot of talking during the scenes by the male talent this one is more subdued, focusing on the white lonely housewife or the come of age girl wanting to explore the black side. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.
There is some anal and a few DP scenes but it's mostly straight M/F sex with more of an emphasis on the girls enjoyment (I'd call this midcore porn as opposed to the heartcore or really hardcore stuff). So you don't get the relentless pounding or the screaming and/or dirty talk all the time which is good.
The main problem is that the scenes get repetitive real quick. The same general scene set up with the same positions and camera angles. Pretty much every scene is shot in a high end bedroom. The scene build ups are pretty short too, not gonzo but not far off either. While there is a lot of good quality stuff it sort of wears on you after a while.
Here's some more technical info:
PICS: All scenes have pics with zips and all photos are 2000x3000. The production value is top end. Very little stripping or scene build up in the pics, usually a few pose shots then it's straight into the action. The earlier photo sets generally have a few hundred pics while the newest material only has around a hundred pics. As is usual, there is generally more action / positions shown in the video than on the pics. You can also view the pics in browser and can explode them up to full size.
VIDS: The got all the bases covered here, you can download from 4k on most pics all the way down to 270 for watching on your phone with about 6 total size options. All of the sizes looked good on my screen and had good stream rates. While I almost never watch porn on my phone I did view a few vids this time and found it streamed really well and I had no navigation issues at all. The in-browser stream function worked really well with limited buffering. The vids from the last few years also have jump indicators on the time bar where you can jump to specific types of action. Download speeds were good for me at around 5mb/sec on a consistent basis.
NAVIGATION & SITE FEEL: I had problems getting scenes to download using Mozilla. I switched to Chrome and had no problems afterward.
There is a model directory but pretty much zero model info. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.
Pagination is an issue here as is the search function because of limited tagging.
There is some advertising on every page and an annoying “Notification” icon which merely tells you that they have a new update and can't seemed to be cleared or turned off.
You get standard prechecked cross sale on signup. The biller here is Rocketgate which I don't recall using before. My main beef with them is that you have to email, live chat, or telephone to cancel your membership. I tried canceling by email several times to no response and no success and then spent 15 minutes on live chat to accomplish the deed.
Overall, I have to say it was a pretty good site. It would be a lot better if the operators combined some or all of their sites into a network (they also run Blackedraw, Tushy and a few others). While the production value is great it just sort of left me feeling a bit ho-hum at the end of the day because of the repetitive nature of the scenes and probably because I like my sites a tad more hardcore than what they do. I echo what Exotics4me said in his review in that those who are newer to porn will probably really like this site given the production while those who know what appeals to them may be left wanting a bit. Still, it is on of the top interracial sites in my book and would recommend taking it for a spin for a month or so.
That's good to know. I haven't been a member there in years because they jacked the price. Looks like I'll have to put it back on my list of places to check out again.
Don't get me wrong, Blue Angel is a hot little Euro minx who does it all. It's just that I don't get why this is a separate site on the 21sextury network.
First, there is zero background info about Blue Angel: no bio, no blog, no web cams or live events, no interaction with her at all. It's just a collection of postings about her and the majority of these are just behind the scenes shoots and videos of her hanging with friends or doing normal stuff. There are only 6 b/g scenes with her and most of the rest are solo poses, lesbian and group girl scenes. This isn't bad considering there are 60 scenes overall but she also appears in other network sites and some of the content here is just a different shoot from another network scene.
With Sandy, of ClubSandy fame, having retired (and apparently unretired now) and Sophie Moone no longer updating I can see why 21sextury might want another flagship girl to build a site around. However, given how limited the interaction is there is really no connection to be made between the subscriber and Blue Angel. She's nice to look at but that's where it ends. If they aren't going to do more for her site then I would say it would have been better just to mix her content into the other existing sites more.
Having rejuiced my Twisty's membership for a few days I thought I'd take a gander to see what's new at BlueFantasies. Guess what? Nothing. The last update was in October of 09. Don't know why this happened but it's too bad as it was a decent site.
For those of you thinking about joining Twisty's or here (still worth a cheap trial membership even though it's no longer updating) here's the run down on what you get:
Pics: About 780 galleries, almost all solo. Pic sizes are only 1200x860 with a few 1600x1070 tossed in. All sets have zip and the quality is very good. No size options to choose from.
Vids: About 435 with virtually all of them solo. All vids seem to be 640x480. Only DL options are wmv, QT and iphone. Again, the quality is very good.
You get the same search engine that they have at twistys when it comes to choosing your model or toy or body type your looking for which is useful. The tags are a bit generic though. The model directory is just OK when compared to Twistys because the data seems a lot less specific.
As I mentioned, if you like glamour and decent quality then this site isn't bad. I woulnd't fork out a monthly membership here, especially since they're no longer updating but if you hop on for on the 2 day full access trial specials available through TBP you might like the offerings.
Good to know. I tried to join about 10 days ago and ran into the same problem as Denner. I also ran into the same problem on Bustyones so Shap might consider looking at all the network sites to make sure the problem isn't a universal thing.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Lots of exclusive content (220+ models and most have multiple sets)
- Good sized pics with zip (1280 x 850)
- No DRM
- Excellent trial rate of $2.26 for 2 days through TBP
- Excellent search functions
Cons:
- No picture download options, you only get one size
- Vids are only average and come in wmp and quicktime downloads at 640x480 with average download speeds
- Only 50 videos and most are short (under 8 minutes) and some have annoying music in them
- Pics only come in one size
Bottom Line:
I joined this site as part of the TBP trial offer. I was generally impressed by the content at it appears to be almost all exclusive. It has a lot of porn stars and generally attractive women. You also get to link into Twisty's, Annette Dawn and the Twisty's clone sites as part of your bonus features.
The search function is very good. You can look up models, physical features, clothing, etc. for the sets. The site is pretty softcore, not much toys or lesbianism. The focus is mostly glamour shots.
I like the fact that Twisty's has added an exlusive glamour site. However, for my money the content is only above average. If you like pornstars or amateurs there are better sites with better content out there. The content isn't bad but it's a little too glamour for me. The lack of vids and general non high definition content also puts it back in the pack as well.
It's definitely worth the trial since you also get access to the Twisty's sites as well. I will note that I joined through epoch and I got an offer to stay a member for $9.99 per month.
Happened to see Maggie's review on this site today and hopefully this comment should clear up some questions she had about this site. The material from this site originated from the Robert-Rosenberg.com site that existed about 10 years ago and was originally part of the, now, Tainster network. So, don't ever expect to see any HD vids on this site (didn't exist back then) and don't expect it to ever really grow (it wasn't very big 10 years ago either). The original site at least had pics (tiny by todays standards) but I see they don't have any today. Basically, just another site trying to milk out a last dollop of cash by recycling old content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
