| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Reply
Thanks for the feedback on this. I'll probably sign up sometime in the next few months.
|
02-12-09 10:01pm
|
Comment
527
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
|
02-11-09 02:33pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
528
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I am never suprised at the ratings models get on sites becuase no one has as good of taste in women as I do and, as such, cannot possibly know what the heck they are doing when it comes to rating babes ;)
I really don't care or even look at the ratings that members give models on sites. The only thing that is annoying is when your search is limited to the internal ratings system which, thankfully, I have only come across once.
I like the fact that sites let users give ratings and comments as part of the experience but it doesn't do anything for me. Unlike PU you pretty much get a bunch of Neanderthal comments ... so easy a caveman can do it ....
|
02-11-09 11:09am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I follow the old dogma that if it's new to me it still counts as new. Obviously, I would not go back to such a site and I probably wouldn't pay $30 for a monthly membership to get the content. If the price was lower than I would strongly consider it.
|
02-10-09 04:51pm
|
Reply
530
|
Naked Novices
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
I like that word "shonk". Cant' say I've heard of it before. Sounds like a name that should have it's place in the PU vocabularly as an unscrupulous vendor.
|
02-10-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
531
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jutti24's Review
Pricey ain't the word for it. $60 for a month (40 euros)??? I think I'll stick with Anilos or Allover30 and save a few bucks. I'd hope they have a huge amount of content for that price.
|
02-06-09 03:45pm
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Whichever color the voices in my head tell me too ... must do as they command ....
|
02-05-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
533
|
Reel Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
When deciding on whether to sign up or not, I looked at the Newsensations page and their list of network sites and not all of the reelpass sites were listed. I think this is true otherwise TBP would have the reelpass listed a clone site of Newsenations but I could be wrong.
|
02-04-09 05:36pm
|
Reply
534
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sorry to hear about this. I was thinking of re-upping my membership since it's been about 18 months since I was last there. Sounds like they're cutting back to save a few bucks.
|
02-04-09 04:52pm
|
Comment
535
|
Reel Pass
(0)
|
|
02-04-09 04:45pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Mmmm, I suppose "attractive" toys are better than unattractive toys but, as PinkPanther noted, it's more about the model and what she can do with various implements of satisfaction than a specific type of poon penetrator. Nothing takes the place of acting and no gold plated phallic device will ever make a wretched scene more entertaining.
|
02-04-09 04:28pm
|
Review
537
|
Fresh Outta High School
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Cheap $5, 3 day full access trial with TBP
+ Generally hot looking 18 - 23 old starlets in HC action
+ Exclusive content
+ Videos are pretty hot and 30 minutes long on average and no DRM
+ Access to 24 original content sites (Reelpass) and 22 nonexclusive bonus sites
+ Good for those with a schoolgirl / uniform fetish
+ No watermarks |
| Cons: |
- It's a Newsensations product, 'nuff said
- Pics are small and lack a lot of the content found in the vids
- No email confirmation of signup or cancellation with the netbilling.com processor
- Updates only 1x per week
- Some advertising on site
- Reptitive in sets and theme |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site on a trial since I noticed it wasn't part of the Newsensations network and I was hoping that maybe they were upgrading their product since it wasn't part of that group ... and I was wrong.
Currently, there are 62 sets/scenes and all have pics and vids. Pretty much all feature US youngsters in school girl skirts and conservative tops getting bopped in various ways. The production value is mostly professional with decent lighting and plot settings. Most of the time the girl stays mostly clothed so if you're into uniform type sex you might like this.
A lot of the sets are the same and scenes don't vary much so it does get repetitive. There a lot of known pornstars but a few fresh faces as well. No real model directory or model background is offered.
Pictures: Each set has about 200 to 300 pics but most are them are just of the girl stripping. Sizes only come in at 1024x680 with a few random 1530x1020's tossed in just to prove that they're intentionlly skimping on pic size. All sets have zip with good labelling. Like I noted, a lot of action on the vids get left out of the pics and you usually end up with a few dozen HC pics. Basically, don't go here for the pics.
Videos: Vid size maxes out at 800x600 with full scenes eating up a few hundred megs of disc space. Download speeds were OK. WMV is the only real option here for the biggest size. The action tends to be pretty good overall. There are hundreds of vid caps for each set so you know what you'll be getting on your downloads.
As I noted you also get access to the reelpass network with is mostly a newsensations clone. You do get access to newsensations so joining here on the trial might be a cheap way to update from that network if you like their product. This network (reelpass) is not pic friendly so, again, go here for the vids. The bonus sites are just the usual suspects (teensforcash, herfistanal, etc) and pretty much stream only though you can download clips if you're desperate for second rate entertainment.
On it's own this site merits a 79. Kick it up a notch or two when rating the whole network. Bigger and more pics would be a welcomed bonus (one of the main reasons I don't go back to Newsensations any more) and bigger vids would also be a nice addition.
I did the trial and had no problem getting what I wanted from this site in a day. If you like school girls this site is OK but you might be more entertained with a site like Innocenthigh. If you have the uniform sex fetish going, this ain't bad but I'd stick with the trial. |
|
02-04-09 04:19pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
538
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Like most, the uninteresting file labelling system is the way to go. Even staring directly at my folders and subfolders o' porn looks like a bad trip down work file lane ... just so long as no-one does a jpeg or wmv file search.
GO GROUNDHOG!!!
|
02-02-09 11:40am
|
Reply
539
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
It's been a while since I was at a 21st sextury site and recall that their pic sizes were pretty good. Just wondering what size the pics are coming at now and how about how many you get in a set since I'm thinking about signing up again?
|
01-28-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
I said no but I worry about it. The only problem with sort of off-the-cuff saying porn doesn't cause problems is that if you have a problem with it you probably won't be the first person to recognize you have a problem with it. In other words it sort of creeps up on you slowly pushing other things out of your life.
Personally, I think the addiction aspect needs to be taken a little more seriously because porn is a hobby most of us do alone and without others really knowing about it so we get good at hiding what we're doing. Given that porn is meant to stimulate your "base urges" it is something that can lead some to lose a handle on it as evidenced by fellow PUer's shutting down their accounts here. So I consume it but I'm also cautious about monitoring how much time I invest in it.
|
01-28-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
541
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Sorry, that may have been me on the "no DRM" thing that I saw posted on an adult business site that I happened to come across about a week ago. They had a headline saying that Hustler was quitting the DRM thing so I posted a comment here on that primarily to see if that was true or not. Apparently not but not sure when it is/was supposed to take effect but so far, no dice.
|
01-25-09 10:30pm
|
Reply
542
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was one some DDF sites earlier this year and noticed that recycling content was getting to be a bit of theme with them. My guess is that we can all look forward to "hot new releases" from the year 2005 coming soon ... maybe the porn industry needs to apply for some government bailout money so they won't do this to us any more ;)
|
01-23-09 03:41pm
|
Reply
543
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
In their new forum they do have a section on photo sizes. Basically the only word posted from Holly Randall (who's now running the show) is that "it's in discussion" about going up 1600 or 1800 on the pics. I can't imagine that there's much to discuss but there it be :)
|
01-22-09 08:47pm
|
Review
544
|
Suze Classics
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Good $10, 7 days full access trial
+ Also get full access to suze.net and suzevideo
+ Definite retro porn from the 80's and 90's
+ Pics remastered up to 1200x850 with zips
+ Good quality vids
+ Exlusive updates (er, "retrodates" perhaps) 3-4x a week
+ No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No video and pic set overlap (aka - no pic sets and vids of the same scene)
- No real HC photosets
- Site still smallish
- Prechecked cross-sale(s) on sign-up page
- Advertising on the pages but no too annoying |
| Bottom Line: |
If unshaved muff and names like Raqueal Darrian, Savannah, Christi Canyon and Teri Weigel bring back fond memories then this site might be worth donning your smoking jacket, trimming your 'stache and sitting back to go stroking with the oldies. This site features porn US stars from the 80's and 90's.
Here's the basic breakdown:
Pics: There are about 110 sets and all have zip. Three sizes going up 1200x850. All are basically digitally scanned photos from the original pic or negative and there is a smallish transparent watermark. Surprisingly there was very little graininess so the quality was good for what they were. The original lighting and cropping sometimes suffered though. The sets are somewhat small (most having less than 50 pics). I counted one true hc set but there were a few psuedo hc sets (no penetration) from the days when the skin mags couldn't show that stuff. This is defintely glam porn so if amateurs are your thing you probably won't be too into this.
Vids: About 75 vids using WMV player only. 3 sizes to choose from (300k, 1 gig and 2 gig) and they're about 15 minutes long. The largest sized out at 720x540 and they streamed for me around 350 kbs. Almost all the scenes are HC and remastered from the original film or tape. Again the quality on the remasters was very good but the original lighting and directing sometimes left something to be desired. Still there was some hot action here.
I'm scoring this site on it's own at an 82 simply because it's still growing, the original quality was sometimes suspect and for some reason this site did less for me than I expected it would. As I noted, you also get full access to Suze.net and Suzevideo. When you consider the network as whole, I'd score it around an 89 or 90 because the other two sites save it (See my comment on the suze.net page entitled "Site Stats Update" for what the network currently contains).
They have also added a forum but it's still relatively new, not real informative and the only person from Suze who seems to contribute is Holly Randall (she seems to be running the show now). There is a model directory but it doesn't have much background info on the models themselves. There is also a search function for various sex acts and poses.
If you're into retro porn, the 7 day trial price makes it worth checking out. For me, it was more of reminder of how much better porn is today than it was years ago but there is still some decent stuff there. |
|
01-22-09 06:20pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, depending on where you live the cops can be pretty harsh when it comes to pursuing child porn cases against against kids who post their "boobie" shots. Always a great way to start off your career ... get convicted of child porn, can't expunge your record because the DA probably prosecuted you as an adult even though you were under 18 and then you might also have to register as a sex offender for years to come. I don't think enough parents give their kids a hard sit down talk, if that even matters, about that kind of stuff.
As for the myspace and other community sites? My only presence on the web is pretty much here. No nosey employers looking at me here ... I hope.
|
01-22-09 04:45pm
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Personally, I'm waiting for todays generation of teens who take pics and vids of everything to grow up and start running for political office. At that point, the web should be filled with celebs and politico's youthful indiscretions of flashing tits, puking up drunk, doing drugs and in compromoising positions with their girl/boyfriends.
|
01-22-09 01:58pm
|
Reply
547
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Thanks for the review on this one. I was a member a few years ago and, being a picture person, was somewhat disappointed in the smallish picture sizes. From some of the free thumbnails I've seen it looks like the pics have gotten bigger so I was wondering what pixel size their stuff is coming in at now a days.
|
01-22-09 01:51pm
|
Comment
548
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
01-22-09 01:16pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
549
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
|
01-22-09 01:14pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
That's one of those things I don't know about. I can see collecting for years but when I get old maybe I'll have other interests ... like scoring on all the widows at the old folks home ;)
|
01-19-09 12:00pm
|
