| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Oh, I like the idea of the PU board game. You get penalty cards that say you didn't read the reviews before joining a site or get sent to "PU Jail" by Khan for being a nasty poster in the forum. I assume the ultimate goal would be to amass the most points and win big raffle money and trust scores?
|
03-11-09 11:44am
|
Comment
502
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
|
03-11-09 12:43am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
It all depends on how it's done. If it's some gross looking Ron Jeremy wanna be tossin' some young girls salad it really doesn't do anything for me. If they guy is still in decent shape and the production value is good I really don't care. Too often though it's just some old farts porn fantasy that he's trying to peddle on the web or it's just some gonzo angle that they're using to push a niche site.
|
03-11-09 12:33am
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, this has come up in the forum before so I thought I'd toss it out as a poll question. I would buy stuff it was tasteful in regards to clothing. If there was something like a coffee mug or something similar that you don't tote around in public everyday I'd probably snap it right up.
|
03-11-09 12:27am
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Since I happen to have seen more than 1 or 2 porn vids in my lifetime I'd have to say that it's nice to see some variety in the shoots and that goes for the scenery as well. There are times when the photographer gets carried away trying to emphasize that they're shooting on location someplace exotice. However, when looking at scenes from a particular production company it gets pretty generic when every scene is shot on the same couch or same hotel room, etc. Everything starts bleeding together.
So, I guess variety is good, just don't go overboard trying to emphasize variety for its own sake.
|
03-09-09 11:57am
|
Reply
506
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Reply
I've actually never joined but I know that I have seen B/G scenes on some tgp sites and you might find some on the tour. How much b/g they have I can't really say. You might try posting a comment under AO30 here at PU to see if someone else knows more than I do.
|
02-27-09 06:22pm
|
Reply
507
|
Enigmatic Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU. However, you're going to need to put more effort into your reviews if indeed this is not just a spam posting. Giving a site a "100" is going to get you grief. Giving a "100" without any detail in your analysis is not really helping anyone out who might see your reviews in the future. I hope you take the time to come back and edit your review otherwise you're going to get a lot more negative trust ratings than you're already starting to get.
|
02-25-09 02:35pm
|
Reply
508
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Reply
509
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have a few times, mostly before I started relying on PU and review sites to help guide me. Since then it's mostly been because of a fracked up sign-up process that left me wondering who the hell the billing processor is or wondering if I might have been cross sold because I wasn't careful enough in making sure the pre-checked boxes were unchecked. It's been a while since I've felt shafted by the content after a few minutes. A few hours or days? That's a different story.
|
02-25-09 12:04am
|
Reply
510
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the kick-ass review on this one. It's on my list but I still need to check out ALS Scan first. I know, I'm lame for not having been there but I'm more into hardcore.
|
02-24-09 10:08pm
|
Reply
511
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Comment
In response to your question about how to join scenes together, that came up in the forum some time ago. I don't know if it will help you but here's the link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=194.
While they have some decent content my main beef with the site was that the content only had limited angles. By that I mean, for example, in the hardcore stuff you might only get a couple of positions in a scene. That sort of left me wanting.
It is a good site for those who like women and hosery but it needs help in my opinion before I'd rejoin.
|
02-24-09 10:05pm
|
Review
512
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Freakin' huge amount of content
+ Good $20 TBP monthly membership
+ 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F)
+ Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum
+ No DRM
+ Supports download managers
+ Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks
+ Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive
+ Full tour available before joining |
| Cons: |
- Search function leaves a real nasty after taste
- More of a pic site than a video site
- Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between
- Quality varies
- "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds.
- Older material is mostly nonexclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography.
Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller.
Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around.
My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n".
The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it.
There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for.
Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot.
The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff.
This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times.
If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all. |
|
02-24-09 09:33pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
513
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Great $10, 7 day full access trial through TBP
+ Full access preview before joining (can't view individual sets but can view all model and category content)
+ Very professional production
+ 17 categories of photoshoots, all sets have zips
+ No DRM
+ Top quality models for the most part |
| Cons: |
- Updates only every other day
- Videos are in short clips only
- You've probably already seen the older content
- Pics max out at 1280 pixels
- Limited model info |
| Bottom Line: |
Vivthomas is a top notch photographer who's stuff you've probably already seen on sites like Teendreams, ATKgalleria, and others. His focus on Euro glam porn. This is my second time joining and I only hopped on for the trial.
For those interested in vids, forget this site and consider Vivthomasvideo. All you get are short clips and access to some streaming vids. I didn't really mess around with this but I note that the clips played at 640x480 in wmv. Most of this stuff is only a few minutes long.
The pics are the real reason to go here. He does a very professional job in terms of production value and overall quality. Very few blurry shots or bad lighting. He also uses a variety of sets so it's not overly reptitive. Most sets have fewer than 100 pics which I tend to like since you don't get 10 shots of the same thing. There is a small watermark in the cornor of the pics.
The hardcore was good but it doesn't update that often. Viv is probably at his best when shooting solo models. He does a good job of shooting lingerie and seems to bring out some sexiness in the models which a lot of sites seem to lack. There's 17 categories to choose from and you get about 650 models and there's about 165k pics. Some models have bios and bits about them but most don't have anything. The model directory appears to be complete and accurate.
There is also a forum which has a fair amount of activity and you can buy his dvds from the site too.
I'm only scoring this site an 82 because so much of his older content is leased out that I've seen most of it before. The new stuff is exclusive but it too will eventually start cropping up elsewhere. I certainly had no problem getting what I wanted during the trial period and if you've been around porn for a while you shouldn't have any problem getting by on a trial either.
I'm also scoring the site an 82 because of the lack of video content. Granted, he has a video site which costs more but I think I'd rather see him merge the two sites together and charge a bit more to get all the content.
My last reason for the score is that his photos sometimes appear in larger sizes on other sites. I just joined Teendreams and their Vivthomas pics are much larger. You get a little graininess but it's minimal. So all I have to say is "Viv, grow 'em bigger!".
So, if you like pics, like hot euro babes and want a cheap distraction, then I suggest checking it out. |
|
02-24-09 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
514
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Reply
I agree with Badandy, if you go back and make some changes we'll cut you some slack being this is your first review.
|
02-24-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
515
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Review
Have to admit, this is as close as I've seen to a blatant website advertisement here in a while. Let's see, a member over 6 months ago, no site facts or specifics, and your "cons" section make it sound like there's hardcore boy/girl content on this site when there's not. I'd go on but I'm not going to waste my time.
|
02-23-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Now that I reflect on it for a moment I guess I primarly use tgp's to look at niches that I happen to like. With so many tgp sites out there it's not too difficult to find one that suits what you're looking for.
Since I'm more of a pic guy, I also use them to look at sets from sites that I might be interested in joining to find out what their pic size is like although this can sometimes be misleading.
|
02-23-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have several that I visit a several times a week (ones that don't keep taking you to other tgp sites). I find them useful to see what new sites come up from time to time and what kind of content they have. If there is something that looks interesting I'll then check it out here. I've also found a few membership deals from the links on them.
In all honesty, I think TGP sites are mostly good for people trolling for free porn and porn newbies who occasionally get suckered into misleading promos.
|
02-23-09 11:47am
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I've only paid more than $30 for a site once and was only partially satisfied with the content. Sine then I've tended to shy away from the pricey stuff mostly on the idea that there are lots of sites for $30 or less that I would to join before. A rocking site with great reviews would be worth extra but until I exhaust myself, I'll wait.
|
02-22-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
519
|
Sperm From Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt33's Review
Hey Matt, welcome to PU. As a note, I'm glad you're chipping in with some reviews on gay sites since most members are hetero. However, you do need to add more content to your reviews. As they are now, they really don't provide any useful information to readers. I'd suggest looking at some of the reviews of the top posters here or checking out the following forum thread on writing reviews: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
|
02-20-09 05:16pm
|
Reply
520
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I do admit you did a good job of justifying your "100" score. My only beef with NA is that their pics lack size, especially the older stuff which hurts them in my book a pic guy. When looking at your score it's more based upon your preference which is perfectly acceptable. Overall, when looking at everything the site has to offer in terms of specs I couldn't pull the trigger on such a score. Guess I try to be too objective.
|
02-20-09 11:56am
|
Reply
521
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Yeah, it's probably time for a review but I'm thinking it's just marketing. They recently reduced the number of updates to the Brazzer's site in order to start beefing the rolls on Mofos. You're going to see the same girls and pretty much get the same thing as Brazzers just in a new package.
|
02-19-09 11:34am
|
Reply
522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If they were straight and if they ever went on a date with me, at that point they would become lesbians ;)
|
02-19-09 11:29am
|
Reply
523
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Since it's my poll I guess I'd better chime in and say that pretty much my cutoff line is 70 but realistically it's more in the mid to high 70's if there is a review. Knowing that I tend to be harsher than the TBP staff I generally only look at TPB sites rated in the mid 70's or up.
I'm sort of surprised that so few profess to have a cutoff line. Let's be real, how many people are signing up for or actively searching for sites that get scores in the 50's or 60's?
|
02-17-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
524
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Don't know exactly how big you like them but Brazzersnetwork is relatively inexpensive, has a ton of big chested gals, no DL limits and has reasonable quality. DDF Busty is more expensive but has better quality and no DL limits.
|
02-13-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
525
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
OSHA needs to get involved as more government regulation always makes things better ("We're from the government, we're here to help" .... NOT!) No government involvment on condoms but flying man goo must be regulated as an unauthorized use of air space or overseen by the medical boards as a Pink Eye Protein ProtEction Regulation so all the chicks can say "Don't PEPPER my face, dude!".
|
02-13-09 12:25pm
|
