| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
One of the benefits of being more of a porn picture guy. Dump the porn movies? No problemo. However, I own very few regular movies so losing them would be no big deal either.
|
03-31-09 11:37am
|
Reply
477
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
I think I made an "oops" in my prior comment. I had recently joined, Brazzer's, not Bangbros so you should ignore my comment regarding the condom thing. Haven't been to Bangbros in a few years. Reading and thinking, maybe two great ideas that I should try using together ;)
|
03-30-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Amen brother!
|
03-27-09 03:02pm
|
Reply
479
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
Good review (here and on Hegre Art too). My only advice is that if you start reviewing sites that don't have as many reviews as these is to give a few more site statistics (pic and video sizes, zips, etc.). Otherwise things look pretty sweet.
|
03-27-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
480
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
"Strip, strip, strip, strip, nude". Sounds like these gals would be great at refinishing furniture ;) Maybe that's why their staying clothed, those chemicals can be nasty.
|
03-26-09 12:07pm
|
Comment
481
|
Lily Wow
(0)
|
|
03-25-09 01:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
482
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
|
03-25-09 01:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
483
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have three views on this. First, the military is rejecting a bunch of potential recruits because they're too damn fat !!! At least 25% of American youth got too many cheeseburgers hanging off their butt cheeks to even meet the military's weight criteria. So, by expanding to gays you're opening up your recruiting base by about 6% (about the national average of gay people in society) to help offset against the lard butts.
Second, I've never really bought into the whole concept that you got to watch your behind in the foxhole or the shower mentality. There were gays at the gym I used to go to and frankly I didn't really care if they saw me naked or not. Hey, if they're interested in my bod then I figured I mut be hot to trot for the ladies too. Ultimately, when you go to war it's trust that your fellow grunt won't let you down that counts. Whether or not that fellow grunt rubs loins with the ladies or the guys makes no difference to me when you're staring the wrong end of an RPG.
Lastly, there seem to be a lot of women in the military now in front line support positions yet somehow it seems our military continue to function with the female equation added in. I guess what I'm getting at with the last 2 points is that the modern military takes young people from all walks of life and molds them into a professional fighting machine. I think it's sort of silly to think that the machine is going to break down because of someone's sexual preference.
|
03-25-09 11:58am
|
Reply
484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ah yes, the old J. Giles Band classic "Angel Was A Centerfold" comes to mind. Of course, that song in itself is about as old as any ex I'd be interested in seeing in a porno ;)
|
03-23-09 09:42pm
|
Reply
485
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Celine's Reply
I've never been a member but have been considering signing up at some point. My question is that by purchasing credits do you actually get to keep the download? Otherwise it sounds like the monthly membership is more of a DRM deal; you get to watch it only while you're a member. Also, how much is one credit? Thanks.
|
03-23-09 05:26pm
|
Reply
486
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I re-upped a few months back and can say that that there is little to no condom use going on any more. Hope that helps.
|
03-23-09 05:22pm
|
Reply
487
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, I'm to crush everyone's little fantasy trip here with a dose of reality. Let's face, when you start getting older, you really don't want to be seeing your ex's, friends or high school heart throbs doing the whole over-the-hill MILF thing. Man, getting older sucks. That and my neighbors are fat asses. That pretty much leaves me with the celebrity picks. Somebody just shoot me now.
|
03-23-09 11:43am
|
Reply
488
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I actually got burned on that one when I signed up a few months ago. I had a hell of time getting the stuff cancelled when I found out that they had "hidden" the cross sales below the transaction button. I should have noted that one in my review so good work in getting a comment posted on this devious practice.
|
03-22-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I put that it's nice but not that important. I agree with Drooler that a good search function makes rejoins a lot easier. Most of the sites that I do rejoin have a simple and clear update schedule or good search that makes this easy. As you might expect, they tend to be the higher scoring sites (not that amazing that good quality porn and good site design and search seem to go hand in hand).
However, for most sites that I don't plan on going back to or rarely go back to, it's not that important. If I pick up a few duplicates so be it. I'd rather have the quality over the search capabilities.
It is frustrating that a lot of sites can't seem to figure out the search thing. It's pretty easy, put some hidden tags on a scene or set and enter it into the data base and put a date on the update. However, this takes work and too many sites, even decent ones, seem to skimp on this aspect.
Large sites that don't have good search like Teendreams get knocked a couple of points in my reviews for crappy search. For smaller sights, it doesn't really hurt their scoring for me.
|
03-21-09 12:16pm
|
Reply
490
|
Cara's Nylon World
(0)
|
Reply of
marinette's Review
I'll echo what G Code said. Sorry about getting ripped off. However, we usually rely on reviews to see what the general content of a site is and what you get for your membership. Thus, adding some of that info to your review would be welcomed, along side your problem with the custom shoot.
|
03-19-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
491
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Uhhh, how about on a sweet set with a hot babe and with good photography and editing skills. Once I find this fantasy land I'll let you know.
|
03-19-09 12:19am
|
Comment
492
|
Felched
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I prefer to think of it as bad porn. They sucker you in, rip you off and take your money to pay royalties to the producers who left long ago after turning in their worthless turd productions.
|
03-18-09 10:22pm
|
Comment
494
|
Cuties In Tights
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
495
|
Cuties In Stockings
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks |
| Cons: |
- Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.
Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.
Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.
The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.
This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.
It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.
I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times. |
|
03-18-09 10:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
496
|
Dream Stash
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
I really dug this site years ago. Yes, it has stopped updating and so I don't go any more. Haven't been a while but sounds like they've downgraded the pics and removed some of the sets. Too bad as I thought it was one of the best POV sites around.
|
03-17-09 09:19pm
|
Reply
497
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Denner has talked about is issue a few times in the forum (there's a new thread by him today on the topic). Basically, contact NS and see if they'll change their pricing or give you a partial refund or something.
|
03-14-09 01:53pm
|
Reply
498
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I haven't joined there in a number of years but as memory recalls the material is almost all nonexclusive. If you've been a member of Twistys or Babestv or Babelicious or similar megasite fecently you've probably already seen most of what they have. Twisty's is cheaper so I haven't bothered to go back to Glamourmodles in a while.
|
03-13-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
499
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Man, what is the deal with this site? A never heard of niche that suddenly gets a bunch of glowing reviews from newbies with no content to any of the reviews. Spam conspiracy or coincidence? I choose the former unless the reviews on this place start getting better.
|
03-12-09 12:32pm
|
Reply
500
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I like the idea of a "CIA covet" operation, it definitely has Biblical implications ... sort of what canceling might be like here. This one caught my eye because it has a 3 day trial which is usually enough time to cancel. If this offer is still around in a week or two I might test the waters after digging through the fine print on the sign-up page and confirming that they use a reliable billing processor.
|
03-11-09 11:47am
|
