Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's like a porn scene mixed with a robotics convention mixed with a home improvement show.
- If you're skeptical of women models having orgasms in porn you should join this site. It gets messy.
- Very basic navigation as with most of the Kink sites. It works well, but they could definitely use a more in-depth search.
- Good download speeds, which are needed since some of the HD scenes get into the 1.5 GB range.
- Kind of surprising, but you'll find a lot of the top-tier models on this site.
- This is a hit or miss depending on the girl, but you actually get quite a bit of dirty talk from some of the models. Others fall into the "Oh shit, oh shit, oh shit" annoying talk.
- Kind of reminds me of some of the old Sybian sites. You see a model that seems to hold back in most of her scenes, then she gets on this site, gets a 8 inch dildo stuffed in her by a mechanical contraption and she goes wild. That's a major plus this site offers that very few do.
Cons:
- Kink sites rarely do much wrong and this one falls into that group of not doing much wrong.
- Kink sites can become very repetitive and once again, this site falls into that group.
- 720p is the highest video option available and I do think this is a Kink standard. I've been a member of three of their sites over the last month and none offered 1080p.
- The action can become too hectic at times on this site.
Bottom Line:
You'll never look at your personal drill the same. I discovered this site years and years ago. It was the only Kink site I would join since I thought most of their stuff was too hardcore for my taste.
I'll get those cons out of the way first.
Repetitiveness. It's to be expected with a site like this. I'll admit, I enjoyed this site quite a bit more back when I first reviewed here on PU way back in May 2008. And it's mostly because the scenes today aren't really any different than they were back then.
Too hectic. Dancing Bear. Party Hardcore. Those two sites are too hectic because there's too many people involved and too many switching cameras. This site is too hectic because the machines work so good. You've got machines pounding the woman at X amount of RPMs, she's screaming, stuff is squirting out, dildos are popping out and slamming into their thighs. Some of the girls, a very young Jynx Maze comes to mind, almost seem to have figured the machines out and move in harmony with them. Other girls on here are letting the machines control them.
But hey, it's better than those solo sites where the girl grinds her hips after 10 minutes of masturbation and claims she had an orgasm.
I do think this content is fairly unique even in 2016. There are models who get completely lost in what the machines are doing them. Those are some of the best scenes.
Technically, Kink will always be strong with 720p clear and smooth videos. They do offer smaller resolution too. Pictures are gone, which I also think is a new standard for Kink sites. The scenes start with the model dressed and talking about different things about themselves, their lives, this can last 7-8 minutes in some of the videos. Once that's done there's usually some kind of basic masturbation with a regular dildo or Wand, then the clothes come completely off and the machines are cranked up.
There's no way I could say this for sure as this is a very big site, but it seems like they would leave some of the models in clothes or even just hose, fishnets, during the scene to add a different feel, but I've not seen any that do. Which is where this number comes in:
Over 1,100 completely exclusive videos. Most of the videos are in the 20-30 minute range and I'm guessing that's just because the girls can't take anymore. You'll see a lot of genuine reactions, orgasms, squirting in these videos. You even get the fun of seeing some models blush, giggle and cover their faces when the scene is over and really just act completely different from what they act like in a normal boy/girl or solo scene. That's why you join this site. Much like other Kink sites there's that one thing most of their sites do and it's worth a join to see it.
I should mention that not every scene is solo. Some of the scenes have more than one girl which, in my opinion, only adds to the hectic style of these videos.
It's another departure from normal porn and it's recommended. I join several of their sites each year, once a year and I can say I've been disappointed with any of them.
Hey Jeffrey, they do use lube, because of the speed and roughness of some of the machines, but the gooey orgasms that I saw were milky white and running. The lube is usually more of a sticky look, especially the one ALS uses. I know that Jenaveve Jolie absolutely soaks herself in one, so bad that she looks sincerely embarrassed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- You ever think the pornstars are faking orgasms, the female ones? Join this site, no faking here!
- They have a ton of content on this site, upwards of 400 scenes in full
- Pretty nice pictures, 1200+ high end in zips
- Lots of well known pornstars, check out Jenaveve Jolie's set, never seen her orgasm like that with a man
- Download speeds are right at average for me
- Join a second kink.com site for 30% off
- Videos are 640 on high end, though some older ones aren't that high
Cons:
- Could be a little TOO much for some. Some of the action gets rather messy, Jenaveve comes to mind again as she drips white cream everywhere. Worked for me, but might not for some!
- Videos are in sections, which is frustrating to say the least.
- Can become repetitive as do all fetish sites
- Video quality could be improved just a little, moreso on the bitrate than resolution, only 700k bitrate on the best quality videos.
Bottom Line:
I found myself chuckling at times on this site. Just imagine, coming home and finding your wife or girlfriend in your toolbox, borrowing your drill!
Most of these women are pornstars, and I have to say that most look like they are having the time of their life with these machines. This is very real, the orgasms are gooey and messy, the screaming makes you turn your speakers down and the constant clonk-clonk of the machines become part of your sexual vocabulary.
Quality is good enough, nothing great, but 640 to me is good enough, I just wish they would speed the bitrate up. My PC is running a 512MB Video Card with 3GB of RAM, and these videos almost stutter, because of the low bitrate. The pictures are nice, but how many really collect pictures of a woman shoving a dildo-laced drill in each of their orifices?
Still, very entertaining site, one of my new favorites. Member comments are hilarious, including one that said the machine used was cloned from his DNA!
I'm not into those boob suction devices, makes me think too much of milking a cow. What you will get the most of from joining this site is watching these women have amazing orgasms. You can't help but enjoy the writhing, grinding, hip-swinging, nearly violent orgasms. Then again, we men realize, we can't make a woman do that!
A definite recommendation, and a add-on membership to Ultimate Surrender only costs $20 more, plus there is no DL limit, like it used to be, so join and enjoy something different!
It is good to see that the kink.com sites have dropped their DL Limit, I have always liked the preview clips from this site, so far everything is working fine. I DL'd around 15 GB since Friday and no problems with the old 10 GB per month limit. Should have a review in a few weeks, just mainly wanted to confirm for the others that the DL Limit is gone! Great job kink.com
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Generic type network that has its strengths, including several once solo sites that are no longer updating, including Brooke Skye.
- More content than you go through in a month, name the niche, they have it, Tranny, Pregnant, Gangbang, Lesbian, Solo, and so on.
- Navigation is good enough for this much content, things could get very confusing though if they're not careful.
- Average DL speed
- Some of these sites are 100% exclusive
- Says 106 sites and over 4,000 DVDs, see cons
- For everything you get the $30 price is not too bad, though I can't see going back.
- Quality on some sites goes up to HD level, but there is no "standard" size across all of the sites, so it can be hit or miss.
Cons:
- You're going to get the old network trick of advertising 106 sites and 4000 DVDs, when in reality, many of the DVDs are the content that fills the 106 sites.
- Some sites have no photos, others like Brooke Skye have lots of photos, in zips too.
- Your guess is as good as mine if they really are updating. The nature of the network being mostly of ripped DVDs, makes it impossible to know what is new and what isn't.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a very good idea. If you ever joined the Mayor Network, a network of Canadian solo models, they are all here. All of their content from their official sites. These include Brooke Skye, Kat Young, Samantha Gauge, Casey Hays, Lucy Summers, Faith Belle and Shelby Belle. From what I've heard, all of them have stopped modeling, so trying to sell their solo sites as active was no longer working since content was being recycled.
For me, Brooke's content is worth looking into this network. She was one of the most genuine, girl next door models I've seen. She answered reportedly 500-1000 emails per month when her site was at its peak, she would wear things that members wanted to see her in, masturbate where members wanted her to masturbate. She has one of porn's most real smiles, freckles, nice athletic body too. My favorite clip was requested by a member, masturbation in public at night. Brooke is sitting along a beach with people walking behind her on a sidewalk. She laughs and blushes, "I'm so going to orgasm at the wrong time".
The others from Mayor's were hit or miss, at least one was non-nude. You get a small Gaya Patal site if you like her. You also get three of those early 2000s major tease style models. Sweet Dominique, Sweet Juliet and Teen Jasmin, throw in solo model Lil' Sin and Teen Sabrina.
Those sites to my knowledge are 100% exclusive. Some of those go up to HD quality, most of those have zips for their photos and are unaltered since their days as standalone sites.
The rest of the network is mostly niche DVD clips listed as sites. I would say this content at best is 15% exclusive. Most of it is DVD ripped quality, 640 high end, but no photos.
The best way to look at the network is this way. You're getting one pretty popular and highly rated network that was running strong up until 2008 that was of solo Canadian models. You get 5 sites of solo models that were near the top of porn's "innocent" phase in the early 2000s and you get a cookie cutter DVD site with 4,000+ DVDs. Sweet Dominique was the first I ever joined and I vaguely remember a banner on her site back in 2002 claiming, "The internet's most downloaded teen".
Overall, I think the network could have its audience. The Mayor Network was $25 and very popular with members, even here at PU. Those innocent models from the early 2000s are worth re-visiting again. And though the DVDs are non-exclusive, that goes into the old adage of "It is new to me if I haven't seen it". You're sure to find something in those that interests you.
The varying quality hurts a bit, lack of photos on some sites hurt, lack of zips on some of the ones with photos hurt. I think hit or miss is the best way to describe the network. I will say that I won't be back, at best it is a one month join to scour the exclusive sites, none of those exclusive sites are updating though.
My recommendation is if you like the models in the exclusive sites, try it out, if not, don't fool with it.
Heh, I never figured out much of anything on the site! I ended up leaving the site after the 3rd day of the 5 day membership and not going back. The content I downloaded is pretty good, some of the girls are really cute, most are Brazilian and the quality is excellent, but there are some really softcore shoots too. Nothing more frustrating than downloading a 1 GB file that is a girl rolling around on a bed for 15 minutes! What I think the big problem is, the site/network is trying to be too many things at once. Some of it looks artsy, some of it is raw hardcore, some of it is trying to be very erotic, and so on. Its like they need to find a happy medium and at least make that the basis the sites are built on. The pictures are a waste, no zips, and that is a shame since they do have nice coloring and feel to some of the picture sets. Reminds me a bit of the 21st Sextury sites quality of photos, they have a warmness to them. Oh and some of the videos, hardcore b/g especially seem to end before they are supposed to. No cumshot of any kind. Add to this that these models are mostly unknowns, making the search feature pointless since we don't know their names.
I will say this for them. After reading through their forum, if nothing else, they are trying very hard. I don't know if they are doing it yet or not, but they had a thread that talked about if guests would join their forum, they would give them 4 full length clips to sample. They really know their video quality is that good and it is. Just seems to be production problems stop the quality from really showing. Also the language barrier. I speak pretty fluent Spanish, my wife's native language is Spanish as well, but some of the girls are speaking Portuguese. I remember that some part of Rio, maybe half of it speaks Portuguese instead of Spanish, so that hurts too. Ending with, the girls are still very cute ha ha.
I joined this site a few days ago, trying to broaden my site memberships and try some new ones while I have some extra change on me.
Lets start with the good, cute, exotic, beautiful young women. Look to be a lot of Brazilian ladies here. Impressive quality on this site, 1920 high end video, 6000 bitrate, very nice to look at the very cute exotic Brazilian ladies.
Now the problems, it comes with 50+ solo sites, I don't recognize any of these models, which I'm saying is a good thing, but no picture zips! How can a site that has true HD, Blue-Ray quality HD, not have freaking zips for the photos? The quality of the pictures isn't very high either 1280 high end. I don't know if they want to just be known as a video site and are just throwing the pictures in for good measure, but those zips sure would be nice. The girls range from cute to beautiful to plain to well, not so good-looking.
Now for the headache. I understand that this site is pulling off a huge amount of high quality updates, advertises 150 updates per month and that is Blue Ray 1920 high end updates. But as you can see below, that is their pricing chart.
I took the 5 days for $25 option. Monthly, nearly $50! I wouldn't say a thing if it wasn't for the fact that they offer a YEAR subscription for $85! They are either severely discounting themselves and their worth or they're getting rich off of dumbasses like me!
Why not throw a $20 for one month price on it? If the quality is as good as the ones I've seen, and the updates keep coming and they keep finding these cute models, then after a month, I would go for the $85 per year deal, but who knows? Either way, I wasn't really ready to review it and I doubt I will be even after my 5 days is up. It isn't giving me enough time to really check out the content and update schedule. Still, worth checking out if you are looking for some seriously high quality porn with cute girls. By the way, my rating was going to be an 80 based on the confusing pricing system, the navigation isn't very good and things can get very confusing when you have 50 sites to go through. I will say the sky is the limit when it comes to potential, but that price is going to have to be lower to get new members to try it out. Price plans below.
G18 discounted monthly $48.18
G18 discounted 50 days $55.45
G18 One Full Year $85.45
G18 weekend break - 2 days $11.26
G18 5 days break $25.00
I agree with you on the user usually being at fault, but I must have been in a hurry in my previous reply and left out that Probiller/Probilling has gotten me twice with cross-sales that were not on the purchase page. These seem to be a different type of cross-sale, one that they "give" the new member for 1 day with no charge, but if not canceled it turns into a $39.95 charge. I didn't know it until I received an email welcoming me to the site I didn't join.
I think things are also becoming more dicey about who owns the billers. One that's plainly-obvious, any of the Fame sites (100+ sites), bill through Fame Cash, so they're doing their own billing. It's a little harder to tell with Probilling, but they are the only biller used by Mind Geeks, the owners of Reality Kings, GFLeaks, Brazzers and over 100 more sites. One of the best examples I can give is Twistys. Once renowned for its content and its customer service. It was bought by Mind Geeks and Probilling became its biller it has since fell into obscurity with hundreds of complaints about cross-sales, difficult cancellation, and just general billing problems.
I find my frustration with the biller to be terrible since I'm usually very patient and even methodical about the signing up process. On a side note: I join Reality Kings several times a year and have never had a problem with Probilling through Reality Kings. I think it could be the programming of the different sites that causes the problems.
If you look at the numbers, it's hard not to believe Mind Geeks own Probilling. Mind Geeks owns 133 sites. Probilling is the primary processor for 146 sites. In comparison: CCBill is the primary processor on over 11,000 sites and Epoch is the primary for over 6,000 sites. The one good thing I can say about them is they accept Visa prepaid cards and most billers don't.
My feelings towards ProBiller are pretty simple. If you look at their FAQs, you'll see things like this:
Customer: I only signed up for a trial but got charged for a full membership.
Probiller: Depending on the package selected, there may have been additional upgrades to your membership.
I mean, really? Someone signed up for a trial to a site and ended up with additional upgrades? Another...
Customer: I cancelled my account; why am I still getting charged?
Probiller: It is possible that additional membership packages may have been selected upon signup that you have not yet cancelled.
I don't know about you, but when I sign up for an account, I would think canceling that account, would stop any other charges. Notice the wording of "may have been selected upon signup", which would imply the customer hasn't even realized it.
I've joined over 300 porn sites in 15 years and have only stopped trusting one biller and it's Probiller.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of sites that are making you believe they are leaked/revenge photos and videos, partnered or owned by Reality Kings.
- To my surprise, there's a lot of content here and it's all in good quality.
- There are 7 sites included and all feature younger/college-aged models in most of our college fantasy scenarios.
- Navigation is pretty good. You can jump from one site to another and despite this being "leaked" content, the models are all named and can be found easily.
- Download speeds are sporadic for me, but the lowest I've seen was in the average range for my connection.
- Dare Dorm is here, could have sworn that used to be on Bang Bros, but maybe I'm confusing it with another site and it's downloadable. I do remember at one time the Dare Dorm content was only available as stream.
Cons:
- Well, I thought there was a chance this site has a lot of amateur content on it and some of it might be, but you won't get that feeling when watching the scenes.
- Typical join these days, seems there's multiple areas you do not want to click unless you want to be charged for add-ons. I used a prepaid Visa on it.
- Another typical one, the "network" is broken into different categories with each "site" having its own niche. Updates are sporadic between the sites.
Bottom Line:
If any site ever needed to just drop the network branding and become a standalone site, this is it. I've been a member of Reality Kings for years and have seen the advertisements for this network. I thought I would try it out as something a little different than what I'm used to, but really, it's not any different than what we are all used to.
Reality Kings and any site associated with them, also can say this for Bang Bros, produces some of the best porn for those who like a blend of races in their model list. This network is no different. There's some very good content here, but outside of Dare Dorm, you're not going to find anything that unique or different here than you would from say Reality Kings or Bang Bros.
It's kind of a shame really. I'm not near as up to date on the newer models so I really can't say what percentage of these girls are amateurs. Having said that, I really like the content. I didn't come into this network thinking I would be that disappointed since I knew of the affiliation with Reality Kings.
Here's what you're getting:
GF Leaks - This isn't a site, but is the network hub where you can scan through all the newest updates all the way back to the oldest updates. Black GFs - 297 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy Asian GFs - 54 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy College GFs - 47 scenes, but hasn't updated since May, 2017. Dare Dorm - 172 scenes, updates once per month. GF Revenge - 483 scenes, updates once per week. Horny Birds - 16 scenes, but hasn't updated since August, 2012.
As you can see, there's really only two sites that are actively updating and they're not updating that often. Going by the GF Leaks page they're averaging about 5-6 updates per month across the network.
This is the thing though, if you're into this content, the older content especially brings in some uniqueness to it. The Dare Dorm content is fairly unique since it's usually more like an orgy and often times it's one guy with four or more women. I think it saves the network as a whole since I've always liked this content.
GF Revenge is just normal porn with the premise thrown in that it's a woman getting revenge on her ex or current boyfriend by recording her cheating on him. It's not bad, but I would call it just average. The other not updating sites are similar to GF Revenge. Maybe they have just started putting everything on GF Revenge?
A mention here for Horny Birds since this content, like Dare Dorm, is fairly unique. There's hardly no content on it, but it's a blend of CFNM, Dare Dorm and the two big "party" sites on other networks. I always thought this content had a lot of potential, but that's usually how it goes. It's still worth grabbing the scenes from it.
There's another site on, I think, Mofos, that does a lot of things that this network does like having the pictures include the woman taking selfies in the mirror. At one time, that type of content appealed to me a lot more than now, so if you're into that, that's another plus for this network.
I think the Dare Dorm and Horny Birds content is as good as you're going to find in this day and age of porn. I think if you're coming into a membership here with the thoughts that you're going to get a bunch of content of real amateurs, you'll be disappointed. If you like CFNM content, it's a nearly-extinct niche, you will like Dare Dorm and Horny Birds. It's almost like I'm doing a balancing act here. I think the good outweighs the bad, but with the low update rate, I probably won't join it again maybe ever, but I don't regret joining it.
***Notice here, the oldest content very much looks like real amateur content that we've all seen plastered all over the internet for years, so if you've seen an older looking porn clip and wondered where it's at, there's a chance it's here. The one I noticed most was "Hugging Sidewalk" I've seen the picture for over a decade. It has a blonde covering her eyes like she's embarrassed and another woman drunk and laying on a sidewalk with her legs spread open. Here's the catch, they have 4 photos from that "scene" and no video.
Everything is here for a good overall site. I just wish it wasn't advertised as amateur. I think if you like Reality Kings and their style of shooting, style of models, you will like this network for one month. You're going to get some fairly unique content that I'm guessing is mostly, if not fully, exclusive and everything on the site works well.
Another note: They use probiller and I've just had too many bad and/or frustrating experiences with them to use anything except a prepaid Visa. I will say here that a lot of sites won't let me use a prepaid Visa, but it looks like the ones that use probiller do allow it.
Good site overall and especially if Dare Dorm and Horny Birds appeals to your taste in porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Gigi Spice's solo site, comes with access to 8 other sites, including 6 exclusive solo girl sites, one non-exclusive site and the best of the bonus sites La Zona Modelos.
- Gigi's content's quality is a bit mixed, the photos max out at 1200 long end though you can get some of the same sets on Pacino's Adventures in 1600 long end quality. All sets are zipped.
- Videos all have top quality of 1280x720 with 6000+ bitrates. Also have lesser quality smaller video files available.
- Nice mixture on Gigi's content of solo, boy/girl hardcore and girl/girl
- Navigation is simple, click photo or videos and the page opens with thumbs to each set.
- Download speed is a little faster than Pacino's Adventures, reaching roughly 95% of my max DL speed.
- All content on Gigi's site is exclusive to Pacino's network.
- She's about as playful and cute as I've seen from a Latina in porn, speaks English, but usually speaks seductively in Spanish. Great video model.
Cons:
- First problem, part of these videos and picture sets are also available on Pacino's Adventures. Not just a few, but more like 33% of them. Seeing that I joined both this site and Pacino's Adventures at $30 each, it needs to be mentioned.
- As Pink Panther noted, Gigi is not the best photo model, she is great when in action and moving around, but some of her actions just don't translate well in photos like licking her lips in 5 straight shots. Probably is as much the photographer's fault since she seems very open to anything.
- Not for sure if it is really updating. The newest content is also available on Pacino's Adventures so they may just be bringing content from that site to here as new.
Bottom Line:
I want to note that I removed 5 points off the Pacino's Adventures score since one of the major draws for me was Gigi's content and I now find out it is shared with this site. I'm sure it was done to bloat the numbers of this site.
Next problem, though I didn't list it in cons, the videos, not all, but some, are parts. I didn't list in cons since these are very long videos with very high quality. Even in parts, one has 3 parts and each part is 15 minutes at 700 MB for 1 part. So as a whole it would be 45 minutes at 2.1 GB. It does reduce the number of full scenes to, estimating, 60.
The good parts, Gigi is very cute and playful. This really shows in her videos. She is dancing in one before she even realizes she is on the camera, she laughs a lot, smiles, good eye contact with the camera and then there is the dirty talk. She has the nice, sultry Spanish accent and attitude for it as well. Think of a much less annoying Rosie Perez. She is convincing that she really is getting off. There is some squirting in her videos that looks to be of the real variety. More spurt than steady stream. She giggles when she squirts as well. Some seem to even catch her off guard. She'll kind of look at the floor in front of her to make sure she squirted and smile.
The girl/girl content is good as well. She has one with another of Pacino's models where both are masturbating together. She looks to accidentally pee trying to push a squirting orgasm out and just starts cracking up. The look is one that says, "Oh well, already started peeing, might as well finish".
Her boy/girl content with Pacino is also good. There is a lot of serious kissing between them, which makes for more, good, believable videos.
I'm pretty sure the newer updates are from Pacino's Adventures. She has also showed up on a few other glam sites with implants. None of the content here has the implanted boobs. If this site was added to Pacino's Adventures as a bonus site, I would consider that the best Latina deal on the internet. As it is, knowing that 1/3 of this content is available on Pacino's Adventures, it takes away a little from both sites.
Still, very little to complain about when we're talking all videos on Gigi's site being HD. As of right now, I have less than half the content downloaded and am already over 25 GB, so the quality is high as is the focus on the content, Gigi. Pictures could be bigger, while the repetitive photos of the same pose for multiple pictures is a bit annoying, the photos are generally entertaining.
I went into a little more detail on the bonus sites in the Pacino's Adventures review, all are ok with La Zona Modelos standing out as the best of those.
Overall, I see this site as a 1 time join, unless Gigi comes back. It's one of the better solo sites and she's an excellent performer. For fans, a recommended join, if not a fan, I would say try Pacino's Adventures and watch a few of her videos there before joining this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that's about women having very visible, messy orgasms. Call it the opposite of a cumshot site.
- Smaller site than I realized with only 58 scenes but this is a relatively rare niche and they are updating once per week.
- Mostly top-level models that even I know of like Maya Bijou, Autumn Falls and Kali Roses.
- Very high technical quality on the videos.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Segpay for billing.
- Believable orgasms.
- Scenes average 35-45 minutes
- Unlimited downloads and streaming.
Cons:
- Tough con to talk about the size of the site. It's a newer site and those into this type of content would probably download all the scenes. Quantity vs Quality debate rages on.
- It could use a promo considering the size of the site.
- They have other sites that you can add on as a whole for $69 more. They also include each model's scenes from their other sites in the model list. It makes that $69 offer look more enticing. That's a con to me.
Bottom Line:
There's very few things I like better in sex or porn than seeing a woman's pleasure. Sites like this are not that common. You almost get the feeling the guys are competing to see how many times they can make the female they're paired with have an orgasm. It's a nice change of pace from scenes being focused on making the man cum.
Autumn Falls scene on here is the best scene I've seen her in. This site makes you wonder how many of the female models are holding back in other hardcore scenes on other sites. There is a relatively high percentage of both males and females that find their partner's pleasure more important than their pleasure. We don't see that much in porn.
Most of the action is pretty standard. Male/female, no threesomes or group sex or lesbian scenes. The only unique part about the content is the focus on the woman having orgasm(s). There's a certain level of tease in the scenes ... from the male. Not stripping or anything like that but pulling out as the woman starts to orgasm then penetrating and speeding up. Some of the orgasms the women have are those world-ending, mind-blowing, whole body shaking orgasms.
The technical side of the site stands out.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, the 720p option has two formats (mp4 and wmv) and 480p. That's on all 58 scenes.
The navigation could be better but since it's smaller site and all scenes are focused on the woman's orgasm it's not quite as important. There are no tags or search features. You just click scenes and they load up.
You do get some public content. Some of the scenes start with the model inserting a remote vibrator in herself and the male controlling it, could be by the pool, could be in a moving car.
You won't be shorted on orgasms. While Autumn Falls scene is my favorite of these, there are scenes with 7 orgasms, even 8 orgasms with other models. There are also squirting orgasms in some of the scenes. Notice my use of "some" that's because of the lack of tags. I would have to watch about 45 hours of these scenes to give exact numbers.
After joining, I realized adding the full package would have been a better option and deal but then again only a few of their other sites appeal to me. I've become a niche porn viewer. With the rare exceptions where there's a model I really like. I could watch Autumn Falls fall off a toilet and enjoy it.
I'm going above my average on the score since this niche is one I've always been interested in. It reminds me a little of the Japanese scenes where the men see how many times they can make the women orgasm. Add the very high quality of the videos and hopefully they'll keep adding new scenes every week. The pictures could be better quality, 1500 long end with zips and are the hybrid studio/screencap sets. This is where they film the model by herself to get 10 or so pictures/caps, usually fully clothed and going into tease, then the sets become screencaps from the video. Very good site for those into the niche, probably an average site to those not into the niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The future best lesbian site on the internet. As long as they keep updating.
- Only 73 scenes currently but 70 of them are 70 of the best lesbian scenes I've seen in years.
- Updates every 3-4 days.
- Top-tier models in every scene.
- Scenes are full of story and are in the 35-45 minute range each.
- Epoch is the biller.
- 95 models, various ages, most are in their teens/twenties.
- Excellent navigation and clean layout. It's a new site. Tags are accurate.
Cons:
- Size of the site has to be mentioned here.
- Price of the site is not going to be popular at $19.95 for streaming and $29.95 for downloading.
- Comes with no other sites.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn was my second favorite porn genre behind solo back 10-15 years ago but maybe more than any genre, lesbian porn has just slacked.
This site is owned by the group that owns Jules Jordan, a very good producer, director and actor. You can see the quality here both technically and in production values.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p download options. The picture sets rival the top photo sites in both quality (technical and editing). Pictures are studio photo sets and top out at 4000 high end with zip downloads available. They also have screencaps as well.
The scenes remind me of Viv Thomas' heyday, back when a producer put two or more beautiful women in front of a camera and told them to go at it.
There are stories in each scene. These stories are even believable. Like two older real estate agents seducing a younger woman who is looking to buy a house. The model list just brought me up to date on the who's who of newer models. How have I not seen Alina Lopez before? Her scene on here with London River just went into my top 10 lesbian scenes of all-time. Have producers just slacked on this Alina Lopez and what looks like a lizard tongue?
The scenes are sensual, sometimes rough, there's licking everywhere, tribbing or scissoring whichever you prefer. There's kissing. There's a man walking around in the area of the house behind them without even noticing them. That's porn.
Most of the scenes do have the younger/older side to them but not near as extreme in the age difference. Stepmom finds out her stepdaughter is dating a girl and starts lecturing on how it's wrong, stepdaughter shows her why it's right.
My leaning here is Jules Jordan or whoever owns it went all in and decided they were finally going to make a lesbian site that whether realistic or not, showcases multiple naked women enjoying themselves and each other.
One of the big positives that didn't make its way into the pros is the models all speak English. If you're a Viv Thomas fan you know a lot of his lesbian scenes were great but hardly no English.
When do you ever watch a 40 minute scene and think, "I wish that was longer"? I did it here.
Here's some models that really stand out to me including the ageless wonder that is Brandy Love, Alina Lopez (she's in 8 scenes here), Adriana Chechik, Adira Allure, a personal favorite I haven't found much of Alex Coal, Autumn Falls, Cecilia Lion, Eliza Ibbara, Emily Willis and the shocker for me ... Georgia Jones. I thought she retired years ago? The always welcome Gina Valentina. The model list alone sells this site. I want to retire from my regular job and become the cameraman on this site.
I worked that in to compliment the cameraperson. Lesbian porn camerawork is very important and you won't miss hardly anything here, from a pretty 22 year old's tongue licking around an older woman's butthole at closeup, to the lost art of filming tribbing. The best filming of it is when the camera gets close enough to see the wet pussy lips sticking together and they do it here.
The size of the site might be a problem for some but it's not for me. I just hope they maybe come through with a promo. Especially if they're going to continue to update regularly and have this high of level models on it. I would join for a year just to see how great this site is going to become.
If it's an added plus, the site has only been updating since August 25, 2019 and they're already at 75 scenes. Maybe Jules is going to throw together a network with his own site and the other sites that group owns?
I would still just join this one for a year if a decent price was available. I think this is also as close to a porn site has got to with porn for men and women. It's not always soft and delicate, it's not always hard and violent but it has a little of all.
I can't say a new site that's not based on some weird fetish I have from high school, has impressed me this much ever.
My favorite scenes include the models starting out with light kissing and fingering themselves. That's not common these days. The acting is even good.
I didn't leave her out on purpose but there are 3 Vina Sky scenes here that are some of her best work. The threesome with Scarlett Sage and Adria Rae is really creative and enjoyable.
The cons are not big deals to me. I probably won't join it more than 3-4 times a year unless the price comes down a little but getting me to join a site 3-4 times a year these days is something only a few sites can do. I also would recommend it to collectors and you know you have to do the download option. I just download everything, videos, photos, screencaps.
It's as high as I'll go on a score for a site this size and hope they'll keep pushing it with the creativity and top models. It has 100 potential.
I never did find any pictures and became frustrated with it so much that I just deleted my download folders for it and gave up. I can honestly say that's the first time I've ever just gave up on a site with such nice content.
Hey Monahan, my apologies for not replying sooner, now that I've been away from this site for a month or so, I've deleted all the content because of the lack of names. I couldn't find scenes I was looking for. It's a shame that something that seems basic is holding this site back like it is.
It's a hard one to rate. I'm still frustrated with it. So, I felt like maybe I had rated it too high! We'll say ours balance out. When you were a member did they have pictures? That part has bothered me almost as much as the navigation has.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very realistic and believable amateur site.
- Really pretty women considering the nature of the site, also see a blend of races and shapes.
- Videos are clear, but have to go premium to get the 1080p videos, my membership came with 720p as the top option. Which is fine with me.
- Download speed is above average, the newer releases seem to take a little longer to download.
- The scenes are generally long (40-50 minutes).
- Bonus access to Girls Do Toys, BTS content and interviews.
- From the best I can tell they update weekly, this leads into the cons that others have pointed out too.
Cons:
- What the hell is going on with this site's navigation? I'm glad I was OCD before joining it, otherwise, it would have made me OCD. I'll go more into this in the bottom line.
- No pictures? If there are pictures I can't find them.
- Premium upgrade for the 1080p, I honestly wish sites would just remove that option since it makes me feel like I'm missing out on something. Hey, blame the OCD from the navigation!
Bottom Line:
Okay, I really like this site. It's repetitive, but the models are the draw. I don't recognize hardly any of these women from other sites or from DVDs, there could be some though. I don't mind the silly premium upgrade part, it's just I don't understand why sites are going to it. I will be really frustrated if I find out there are pictures if you upgrade, otherwise, they lose 5 points for no pictures. What's the point of amateur girls if you don't show them in their regular clothes and have a little tease?
This site's navigation isn't the worst I've seen, but it's confusing. When you click a scene to download or stream, 12 more scenes pop up directly under the streaming video. It reminds me of the scene cutter Videobox uses except the content is just other models. There's no names on the models. The filenames are numbers. Give me some organization please. There's no model list since there's no model names. Do they maybe have multiple scenes of certain models or no?
Having said that, that's all that's wrong with this site. It's a lot since I now have a folder with a bunch of unidentifiable files in it, but the content is very good. It's slightly irritating since I'm not the first person who has complained, which means they most likely have no plans to correct it.
Instead of something easy and logical, you'll find 33 pages of videos with 12 models per page, unless you look through them from the main page where you'll find 49 pages of 8 models. Jeez.
Back to the models, late teens, early 20s, skinny, athletic, well-built (butts and boobs), white, black, mixed, Asian, Hispanic, it's a dream come true for someone like me. Of course I could say I want to see some more built models and maybe some slightly heavier ones, but overall, these models are what I like. Now, if I just knew their names so I could find them when I'm looking through the folder of numbered files.
I don't know if my score is that fair. I know I generally rate higher, but a lot of that is based on my own problems with understanding the difference between a 50 and a 70. I'm rating it above average for me just because of the models. The amateur aspect does bring in some of those scenes where it's way too clear that the model is just there for the money, not to enjoy the sex. And while I'll agree and understand that, it does hurt some of the appeal.
With all the navigation issues, I'd still recommend it for a month, if you like amateur models, you'll probably love this site, would go another 10 points on the score if they did something with the navigation, model names and added photos.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once questioned if this site was for me (2008 review of an 81), it's still around and it's now one of my favorites!
- One of the most unique porn sites on the internet.
- I could be wrong since some of these models could be on other sites but I don't know any of the models from anywhere except this site.
- They have a little of everything for everyone, as far as body types, pubic hair, and real amateur models.
- The site works well and loads quickly, important since I assume their servers are in Australia. DL speeds are very good (about 80% of my max).
- Despite the amateur genre, the content is very high quality.
- You won't ever feel like you're watching cookie-cutter porn on this site. Very unique scenes with what looks like real, believable sex.
- While you're not likely to find an Eve Angel here, I have found many favorites through the years and they all look like women I see in everyday life.
- Billing is handled by Epoch.
- No cross-sales
Cons:
- I will stress this one. In 2007 or 2008, whenever I reviewed this site originally, here at PU, I was neck deep in the Eastern European porn boom that seemed to churn out "perfect 10" models weekly. I questioned the quality of the models here at Girls Out West. And it's important to say, I still don't like every model and I would guess most porn users wouldn't like every model.
- This site has a true pro/con, that I'm listing as a con. It's addictive. The models are almost all new to you if you've never been a member and some are so cute or so pretty that you just have to check out their content. I've been a member for 3 months now after only meaning to join for 1 month.
Bottom Line:
It's worth mentioning that I've typed this out six times only to run out of characters before finishing and starting over. That hasn't happened since probably 2016. In short, Girls Out West, has been a fountain of youth for my porn interest. I once heavily criticized this site, 2008 or 2009, with an 81 review here at PU. Which is below average for my scoring. I didn't like that every model wasn't a perfect 10 and didn't like underarm hair on some of the models. I still don't like underarm hair but I just don't pay attention to it like I used to.
It was a different porn world back then. Eastern Europe ruled the porn world, perfect ten models, prissy, feminine models. They also had two of porn's greatest producers Denys DeFrancesco and Viv Thomas filming back then. In 2019, we have a bunch of models that are just like the last model and producers that think porn is 19 minutes and 56 seconds per scene with the same 5 positions highlighted, in order.
Girls Out West changes that. The main focuses of this site are solo models and lesbian scenes, there are male/female scenes but they're not that common in numbers compared to the other two:
Roughly 2,000 solo scenes, roughly 1,500 lesbian scenes, roughly 300-400 male/female scenes. Hopefully, you're adding that up to nearly 4,000 amateur scenes. They also have over 2,000 photo sets that are shot more in the style of Denys DeFrancesco (DDF) than current photographers. Including starting with a fully dressed model that giggles in some pictures, teases, then is fully nude.
There's personality here that you don't find in many sites these days. The more than 2 models, lesbian scenes have the feeling of, "What happened, she was naked and I got horny so I got naked and those two over there got horny and got naked then we all got together."
Besides the huge amount of exclusive content there's also the technical quality with some videos having 4K dating back a couple years, 1080p, 720p dating back more than a decade. That's rare for amateur sites.
I decided to try Girls Out West again when I saw a picture set, on a free TGP site, of a model named Rubi Valentine. She was cute, playful, sexy, exotic, natural. To my surprise, the watermark was Girls Out West. I joined in November 2018 and am still a member, another rarity for me to let a membership recur for 3 months. I can't help it. With that much back archive and daily updates, it seems like I'm just now seeing every model at least once and have downloaded over 100 models content from the site. That's another plus, the majority of the models have more than one video/photo set, some even have over 20. Besides my initial attraction to Rubi Valentine, once a member, I discovered Lulu. An incredibly cute model that has a "kind you don't take home to mother" side to her. Sorry for the Rick James reference. There's Bianca that could easily have been a top 3 model in the Eastern Euro boom of models.
There's also the frustration in myself for overlooking this site for over a decade. This is the closest I've seen to real, believable sex in porn in years. The Australian accents don't hurt, either. Neither does the kinky, frizzy hair that was made popular years ago. That, in and of itself, is exotic these days. Exotic to me is a look. It could be a darker complexion, it could be dark complexion with green eyes, it could be a hairstyle that's uncommon, an attitude or personality that's not phony (sorry Los Angeles) and Girls Out West does those types of models better than any site that I've joined over the last 5 years.
I won't give it a 100 simply because these models are not for everyone. Including me over a decade ago. I also haven't been a member long enough to say the site is a 100. That's probably my fault. I will say it's the first site I've felt constantly drawn to since joining, since the first time I joined Zishy. The blend of models, slim, heavier, darker complexion, pale complexion, freckles, it's all believable, real.
The amount of content: Close to 4,000 videos, 2,000+ photo sets, is unheard of in the amateur world unless it's one of those amateur sites that has a bunch of 18 second clips. There are interview videos that are fun to watch. The accents and personalities really shine in those. It takes me back to a time when porn was fun, models were shooting it for money but also because they loved having sex and losing inhibitions. There are exhibitionist, voyeuristic, scenes here too. I haven't noticed many implants or tattoos but considering these models come off as genuine, I'm not for sure those would bother most viewers.
It's rare that I let a site recur this long with intentions to go at least one more month. Besides the video quality that is hard to find in amateur porn, the newer photos are 6000x4000 resolution! It's even rarer that I feel bad about giving a 97. Give it a try, at least look at the previews. It has become one of my most recommended sites to others.
Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.
I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.
The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.
Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.
I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.
Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons
Cons:
- To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25
Bottom Line:
My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.
I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.
On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.
Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.
Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.
Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans.
I have seen a few squirting scenes on Sapphic Erotica (same network) but they don't have a tag for squirting. They do have a tag for peeing. The newest peeing scene on Give Me Pink is from December 2007, model is Chrystina. The newer content on Give Me Pink (2013 forward) has removed the milk enema also. The site has 15 peeing scenes total but all are from 2007 and back. Is it just me or are there less peeing scenes these days? I remember back when it seemed like 21 Sextury had at least 1-2 new peeing scenes each week.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
That may have been the deal you received, but back when I did it, it allowed me to switch the remainder of the membership to one of their other sites without paying. Of note, the month I did it, was the very last month they updated Give Me Pink with the Eva Smile set so I don't know if they changed it now as that was over a year ago, but it was a direct shift of remaining membership to another site at that time.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
