I agree about the hidden gems. I remember when I downloaded one model, not realizing it was the eventual hardcore model Tiffany Taylor. Think her name was Celeste on FTV. My favorite model on FTV though has always been Melia or something like that, very old set, Hawaiian girl, who flashes while pumping gas and has her first squirt while masturbating. I don't think she has any other model work except the sets on there and the innocence of her squirting set really was impressive. She looks not only shocked when she does squirt, but almost embarrassed, maybe even a little scared. I gave up on their lesbian scenes. I like harder lesbian scenes like Viv Thomas and the Euro sites have. I do still remember Georgia's sets though. She is a longtime favorite.
*Edit* Just noticed ftvgirlsonline.com has a separate listing here on TBP/PU. This is the same site and the price is $29.95, not the $24.95 listed. Looks strange that the site isn't listed as owned by the same company as FTV. I'm pretty sure it's just a mobile/tablet version of the site.
I joined FTV through a promo ad on Twistys, I think it was Twistys. Instead of sending me to ftvgirls.com where the regular site is, it sent me to ftvgirlsonline.com. The content was all the same, but the site did seem faster and less clunky, but I don't know if this is like a FTV new version that they are testing out or if it's just their own clone of their site. I'm holding out hope that it's a new version and they are going to work more on the navigation and download issues.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed.
Cons:
- My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes.
Bottom Line:
FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.
I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.
It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.
The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.
What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.
Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.
I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.
As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site.
I always like seeing those now hardcore stars in the softer sets, especially early in their careers. One of my favorites that I forgot to mention is the Tiffany Taylor (Celine on FTV) shoot. I didn't even realize Jana Jordan was on there. I'll have to go back and get those.
I can see the use of a highlight video as well. And I even like some of the interview parts as well. Though the interviews are always teetering on tedium. The camera angles could be a bit better too. There is one video I was watching earlier of a model on the FTV toy. It seemed to be a perfect position for at least a minute or two of filming her butt, but the camera stayed in front of her the whole set.
By scanning the update logs it looks like the 1440x1080 videos started around December 2007. They also have remastered some of the older videos as well, but there are still some of those older ones that are fuzzy looking. I would estimate the last 100-105 models have been 1440x1080. There also are a lot of models I've never seen before.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Long overdue re-review of one of the internet's best known porn sites. Originally rated a 91.
- The newest videos are 1440x1080 with hefty 8000 bitrates, also available in a much smaller 352x240 resolution and a middle ground 720x480 resolution version.
- Pictures have been upgraded to 1600 long end, older pictures range from 1052 to 1280 long end. All are downloadable in zips.
- Site runs very fast for me. I consistently get 20% higher speed on downloads than my average download speed.
- As much exclusive content as just about any site I can name off the top of my head.
- Sets are usually more fun than other sites, a little more daring with some public sets, lots of pre-masturbation flashing as well.
- One of the first sites to have a lot of "squirting" content.
- One of the best sites for finding older content of current hardcore stars. Eva Angelina, Sativa Rose, Jenaveve Jolie, Amy Reid to name a select few have some early career solo sets here.
Cons:
- Videos are still split into parts with no full scene download option. I'm not really for sure what the reasoning is behind this practice, but it gets them a few points reduction.
- This is a personal preference one. I know a lot of members wanted newer, fresher models near the amateur level and they have delivered that. That's not something I like though. I prefer the glammed up models.
- Some of the content can become tedious. Like watching a model trying to flash her boobs for 4 minutes. Some of the older sets feature some of porn's wilder girls who just do it.
- A small con to end the cons, I would like to see more pictures from the sets.
Bottom Line:
I seem to be in a porn lull right now. I decided to try FTV out again after nearly 2 years away from it.
The first thing that I'm going to talk about is that the older content is better than the newer content. I think that was because of the models. Eva Angelina's sets here are some of her best on the internet. Also, I stand by my previous statement that the first set with Amy Reid is Amy's best set of her career.
Of the models that have been added since I was last a member (December 2007), I downloaded and plan to keep the content of 12 of them. They update roughly 4 times a month, so at best, I downloaded and will keep 12 out of 90 models. Even at that, most of the 12 are known porn stars.
Most of the other models are girls that look like girls I went to school with or could be the pizza delivery girl. That's great for some members, but I'm not really into the amateur, girl next door look. Though I do really like Tessa, one of the newer models, who I don't think is a porn star.
One really good part for me is that I lost my FTV files from 2007 when one of my hard drives fried. I was able to go back and get those really great pre-2008 sets.
Overall, the site is still one of the best overall sites. It just isn't that great for me. I kind of feel like I just re-joined to get the content I already had.
If it was my first time joining it, I would probably score it in the low 90s.
The split video parts are annoying. It definitely isn't because of size restrictions or concerns. The parts are rarely over 8 minutes each. This is compounded by having a splash screen on nearly all videos. So even if you line the parts up in a media player, there is still the hesitation between loading the parts plus a 2 second splash screen.
I tried joining the files into one big file, but there is still a splash screen every 8 minutes. I could edit the video and cut the splash screen out, but that's more work than I should have to do for a premium site.
The complaint with wanting more pictures should be taken as a compliment. I've always liked their photo sets especially the more public ones and would like to see 250-300 photos from each set.
You really can't knock the site on technical quality. The 1440x1080 videos are very crisp. I do wish more sites would optimize the bitrates to fit the resolution size. I would imagine a 1440x1080 video could run smoothly with a 4000-5000 bitrate, but that's nitpicking.
Most of the interviews are fun enough. It goes back to the model in each one. Eva Angelina is very funny in hers.
The site could easily score 95+ with a few changes. It's hard to say a site has a potential when it has been around as long as FTV has, but it is the best word I can think of in this situation. For those into newer, more unknown models check it out. Some of these newer models they have are really cute and come across as very genuine. Still recommended, especially for those who have never joined it.
Hey nygiants03, I ended up disappointed in the videos of Lenka/Eufrat. One of the biggest problems with FTV, the webmaster leaves comments and talked about how she "Just went through the motions in the video" and maybe that ruined it for me. She still looked great in it and the quality of the video is the best I have seen, very clear. I have always thought her best content is on Evelyn's World, Evelyn is quite sexy as well. She must be close friends with Eufrat, she has a good amount of sets of her on there including one in skin tight jeans that have holes ripped in them, in just the right places.
I picked that Mike's Apartment one up last month, and I also really like the Euro model Stracy that Mike's Apartment has had on it recently. Eufrat has been around for awhile now. Her early stuff isn't very good and is almost all glamour type pictures. She wasn't near as pretty as now or near as curvy below the waist. It looks like she may have filled out some over the last few months. Most of the Euro sites have at least some content of her. Xisty had her as model of the month back in the summer, the 21st Sextury sites have some good content of her too. 1byday has probably her best solo stuff, including two with machines, Sybian and that one that looks like a drill. I think she was shy when she first started and wouldn't do much beyond stripping. Since filling out she is doing everything, which is good for us all! Thanks for the reply.
Yeah and the bad part for me, my membership either runs out tomorrow or the next day. The update is tomorrow. I'm going to try and get on that download as soon as possible. It says the update has over 5 GB of video just of Eufrat. It will be my luck, I will download it and my computer won't play it, then my membership will be out and I won't be able to go back and get the lower quality versions ha ha.
I'm surprised she doesn't have her own site, unless she doesn't think she can produce enough content.
This is probably my 10th time as a member on FTV over the last several years. I've always enjoyed getting the exclusive content that they have. They may have just topped themselves. A new update coming tomorrow 12-5 listed as Lenka, is aka as the gorgeous Eufrat on most Euro sites. Check out the video specs 1440x1080 at 8,000 kbps bitrate. That is Blue Ray DVD quality. I'm only worried about whether my computer will be powerful enough to play this movie. FTV still is one of my all-time favorites. The sets that sold me on the site were the old Ava sets, aka Eva Angelina. If you haven't joined FTV, the time is here to give it a try.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots and lots of beautiful women
- Seeing all kinds of major stars who you know from hardcore movies in softcore, some before they were famous
- FTV toy scenes are almost as good as hardcore
- Very good quality picture sets and high quality video
- Seeing the girls' personalities since most have at least one clip that is talking/interviewing
Cons:
- You won't see many models who have a lot of curves on here...very slim women
- The pro of interviewing can become a con after seeing every girl answer the same way for the most part, "I love sex all the time, anywhere"
- Site can become very repetitive
- Nothing close to hardcore and even g/g scenes are few and far between
- Some of the girls are very shy and leave you teased more than pleased
Bottom Line:
I come back to FTV about once every 6 months, this is the 4th or 5th time I've been a member. FTV was one of the first sites I bought a membership to.
The first few times you see a model use the FTV toy, you will really be excited and impressed, but then it gets repetitive as well. If the girls don't want to try other girls, maybe at least, get two in the same room masturbating at the same time. There really are a lot of major stars on here, that are mostly going by different names than you know them. Some may even slip by without you even realizing who they are.
These points are hard to decide if they are bad things or good things. There are other girls on here who you have never seen before and considering that they look to by shy after watching their videos, you start to think you won't ever see them again on video. One part that is good is that the videos and masturbation is very real. Most of the girls become soaked right there for you to see. Maybe a standout video for me is Amy Ried, who is now into hardcore, in her FTV video she gets about as wet as I have seen a woman get in a solo video, and you actually tell she is geniunely embarrassed by it. Eva Angelina is also here (no glasses sorry fellas), Sativa Rose, Jenevieve Jolie, Shy Love but those right there are going to be by far the curviest and are in the minority. I would still recommend it, I keep going back, so something must be there.
Follow-Up:
Recent HD videos have boosted my original score by 4 points. Incredible quality!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Give me FTV Girls and FTV Milfs and I'm all but set on my porn needs.
– Updating 4 times a month.
– Video and picture quality is as good as you will get.
– Download picture zips and videos. Unlimited as far as I know.
– Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
– The best collection of amateur Milfs.
– Still the best navigation, too.
Cons:
– The infamous nitpick con of porn needs to establish an age range with Milfs and Matures. I'm really not complaining. Just needed a con.
Bottom Line:
The last few years of my porn collecting has seen me turn to mostly amateur models. I'm confident in saying no fully nude porn site gets better amateur models than FTV Girls and FTV Milfs.
FTV Milfs runs into the debate over the use of the Milf word, while it's true, an 18 year old model could be a Milf, by definition. The word in porn does generally signify an age range or if not a range, let's say “over 25”. I've said many times, my favorite porn models are 25-35. That was a big deal back when I said that, I joined and collected a lot of sites with teen models. That was because teens were the big focus in European porn. Things have changed now and my preferred model, body type, seems to be replacing the popularity of teen models.
FTV Milfs covers that range well, but their FTV Girls does too. I join both at the same time.
There are good reasons: Nearly all the content is solo. I like seeing the models wearing their normal clothes, being ready in said clothes and seeing how comfortable they look. There doesn't seem to be any pressure on them to do anything they're not comfortable doing and because of that, they do nearly everything imaginable to themselves. Somewhere, a male pornstar, or just a random male, is saying he can do more for the model than she can and there's me, shaking my head.
I'm even thinking women feel flattered to be on this site. Something special happens when an amateur model’s perception starts out on a positive note instead of feeling like she's just another number on the casting couch. You can see it in the content.
The only downside FTV Milfs has is it's not been around as long as FTV Girls. The site is still big. There are over 400 models and there is a great blend of body types, boob size, race and most look like women you catch yourself taking a second or third look at while shopping for produce.
Speaking of produce, nothing is off limits, bananas acting like dildos and my favorite niche of public nudity, it's all covered on FTV Milfs.
The navigation on the FTV sites continues to make me wonder why others haven't copied it. There is an off chance my years of membership makes it easier to use, but their tags are as good as I have used. I think I even admitted, at one time, I didn't notice the tags and/or just thought those were there for looks. I can't give a number on how accurate the tags are but each time I've clicked one, I've found exactly what the tag said I would find.
The picture sets are some of my favorites. I have regularly admitted I have clothing fetishes and still do. I'm starting to think I'm not going to grow out of those. I would call the pictures warm and natural. The models are also one of the bigger collections of natural Milfs. I haven't noticed a lot of tattoos or implants. Of course, tattoos don't bother me. The models look real. Years ago, I considered the FTV Girls site to be glam, but not anymore and FTV Milfs isn't necessarily glam. Some of the models do seem to feel best in pretty dresses, but it's dresses you would see women wearing at the store.
The downloads are unlimited as far as I know, but I wouldn't be close to hitting a limit. I mostly just download the new videos and picture sets. I have an entire external hard drive of FTV Girls and FTV Milfs content.
I have said this before about just a handful of sites, it feels like a premium site.
You still get 4 new updates per month and that's almost always 4 new women. I don't join enough mainstream porn sites to say all the models are amateurs but that's going to lead me to say, I believe they are. The biggest reason is a fairly simple one. The models don't act like they're just on another porn scene. I believe that could be the biggest strength of FTV Milfs. There's definitely some flattering to be one of the new four models in a month. I'm thinking back to how Playboy’s Playmates and Penthouse Pets were looked at on such an elevated level. I'm thinking these models on FTV Milfs are experiencing their chance to be like those Playmates and Pets were.
With the great navigation, fast download speeds and easy join and cancel from CCBill, there's just not much to complain about and lots to be positive about.
I did lower my score a little on FTV MILFs as I thought it was very good but not as good as it was in the earlier days of it. I am at the point, when I join FTV, I just do the full 7 trial of FTV MILFs and download anything that looks interesting in the new content. It hasn't kept my attention like FTV Girls does. I don't know how they keep up their consistency. My first review of FTV Girls was 13 years ago. It has never got old for me.
I don't think there's much comparison between FTV MILFs and Zishy. Back in my very first review of Zishy, maybe in 2016, I talked about how the photo style, the settings (I'm a native of the west coast and know a lot of the locations) are very similar to FTV and there for awhile, the Zishy sets used to link to FTV when they shared a model. I haven't seen those links lately but Zishy does have the new style navigation which could have messed that up.
FTV MILFs is a lot like FTV Girls. There was a Black Friday special combining those two for $19.95/mo. There's exhibitionism, there's flashing, it's tamer than it was years ago but it's also less tame than Zishy. FTV MILFs brings in what I called "hardcore masturbation", big toys especially and they have the small hardcore male/female sets. I think Zishy is superior in photography to any site on the internet. Part of it could be my familiarity with the settings. His use of shadows is the best I've seen.
As for Zishy vs FTV Girls, that's a tough one. FTV Girls to me, if the split videos don't bother you, is in my opinion, the best porn site on the internet, especially at current time. They have even been showing a faster update schedule though it has slowed over the last few months. They were updating 5-6 times a month instead of the usual 4, which is a pretty big deal since those updates have 3-5 photo sets and 100+ minutes of video. I take a few months break from it each year but since 2015, have had a subscription at least 9 out of 12 months of each year. The only recent downside to FTV Girls is less exhibitionism than they used to have (legal problems). Even so, there's 15+ years of updates with exhibitionism in them. I like to keep an account to FTV Girls and Zishy nearly year round, easier with Zishy's 1 year plan. I use the 3 month plan on FTV Girls and it comes out to around $100 a year for 9 months. I wouldn't be surprised if I go 100 on FTV Girls just because I've joined it four times as many as any site over the last 15 years.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite sites, but have lowered score a few points since my last review of it.
- Follows a similar format and style as FTV Girls.
- Nearly impossible to find a flaw with any of the technical aspects.
- Excellent tagging system that carries over from FTV Girls and works even better here with less models than FTV Girls.
- 240 models currently, the site has slowly but surely started building up a good sized archive with a new model added each week.
- One I really like, models originally starting on FTV Girls years ago are starting to show up on FTV MILFs, 5-10 years after first appearing on FTV Girls. The most recent was Trinity St. Clair.
- A potential pro or con, there's a higher percentage of hardcore male/female sets on FTV MILFs than FTV Girls.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max) and the site runs smooth with multiple navigation positives.
Cons:
- One that might not go over well with those used to FTV Girls, more pornstars are showing up here than FTV Girls.
- Would like more updates as there are months with 2-3 pornstars being in updates, with only 4 updates per month, it lowers the percentage of new first time models.
- No longer a con for me but I know it is for some, the videos are split into actions/parts.
Bottom Line:
The FTV sites have been in my top 5 sites for the last 5 years. FTV Girls still is and I would go as far as saying it's my #1 site after nearly 4 years of constant memberships. I still see FTV MILFs as a top site, it's just not quite as good as FTV Girls.
I'm going to be straight to the point with the newer models part. Of the last 7 models, 4 have been pornstars and I know it must be hard to find MILFs that are First Time Experiences but this slight problem also includes more hardcore scenes. Some sites can pull off the switch between solo site to hardcore but with the established FTV style, hardcore just doesn't work for me.
One of the biggest strengths of FTV MILFs are the models that are first time models but they project a confidence of an older woman who maybe has always wanted to get naked on camera. I think most men in their 30s and up have met at least one woman like this in their life. You meet her and she seems nice and you notice she likes to wear skimpy clothes. The next thing you know, she's showing you upskirts and you're having trouble keeping up with her sexual drive that you know she didn't have when she was younger.
I think the pornstars take away from that strength. I think the hardcore scenes take away from that style. Even the hardcore scenes with women that haven't been on camera before. It's like adding the guy, usually her real-life boyfriend or husband, makes it less porn.
All that explanation for removing 2 points.
Everything else is good. For example, the two newest updates are first time experiences and they're two of the better scenes on the entire site. It takes a skilled pornstar to shoot this style and make it feel like a FTV set. I use her a lot when talking about FTV MILFs, Aaliyah Love, she is very capable of being a tried and true pornstar that can make you think she's a first time on video model.
The navigation is one of the parts that keeps me around. My favorite niche in porn, these days, is exhibitionism. It doesn't have to be fully explicit. It can be teasing an upskirt and it works with these older models. Concerns about lesser exhibitionism on the FTV sites are not as high as they were a year ago. Of the last 15 updates, 14 have some level of public nudity in them and that goes even further with 19 of the last 20 updates having public nudity. Take it one step further and closer to a year, 39 of the last 40 updates have public nudity in them.
It's FTV's bread and butter or wheelhouse. They do public nudity as well as anyone.
The video quality has included 4K since January 2018 and those 4K videos have 12,000 bitrates. I don't download those but they are there for those who want them. I download the SD versions. These are 480p and they are high enough quality 480p that they're good enough for me. You also have the option of downloading 1080p if 4K is more than you want and 480p isn't enough.
My once major con of the splitting of scenes is no longer a con for me. I would even call it a pro for me. A lot of these models are best at the public nudity parts. I download the one to two clips of their public nudity but don't download the indoors masturbation videos. It's becoming a matter of efficiency for me. The quality I download also has to do with the model. If she's a model I really like, I download 1080p and usually all of her clips, not just the public nudity ones. I think that's a nice versatility to have in what you're downloading.
There are 240 models and I'll say I don't find all of them attractive. The ages vary from 24 to 54, those are more rare as you'll find the late 20s to late 30s the most common age range.
The main navigation lets you select from basics like age or breast size or alphabetical or date of release. The tagging system lets you select from Hardcore, 1st Time, Public Nudity, Fetish, Busty, Real Orgasm(s), Dildo and so on.
I do think it takes a little time to get used to the navigation as their tags don't jump out at you. They are just colored and labeled icons that you click. They all work with what looks like 100% accuracy.
Most of the scenes for the models average an hour or more of videos and 4-5 different photo sets with each photo set featuring a different outfit and location. It makes the one update per week easier to accept.
And while I complained about the hardcore scenes there are only 21 or about 10% of their scenes. Maybe that's a complaint that's really a compliment? I like their regular solo content so much that those small amount of hardcore scenes are standing out much more than they should.
As with any FTV content the photography and camerawork on videos is as good as any site on the internet, maybe In the Crack could put an argument for the best but both are nearly perfect in their filming.
I look forward to seeing this site about 5-10 years from now. Hopefully, not much has changed by then. It's still the best MILF site despite my 2 point deduction.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly early version of FTV's take on the MILF genre. Content is being added by the week.
- Same FTV quality as expected. The videos all have 1080p option, picture sets top out at 4000 long end and are downloadable.
- Here's a big plus, there's some models here that are over 30, who I've never seen or heard of.
- Navigation works perfectly, it's the same as FTV's navigation on their other sites and because there's not a lot of content, it's really easy to get around to the content there is.
- Download speeds are in my excellent range. I download in my 90% of top speed range.
- Bills through CCBill
- Very good and limited tagging system, also used on FTV Girls.
- Very happy with the photo sets, most of the models have 3-4 different photo sets (different clothes/location) and in total they are 200-400 pictures of each model.
- Last pro, mainly because I think it will need to be mentioned in cons too. There's hardcore here, meaning boy/girl sets...
Cons:
- There's hardcore here. I don't consider this a con, but I've known a lot of members through the years who believe these solo-type sites shouldn't have men in them, so I thought I would mention it.
- And if you don't like FTV Girl's split video scenes, you're not going to be happy to hear that feature is on FTV MILFs too.
- A small amount of the content is from FTV Girls
Bottom Line:
I think many of us have waited patiently for the new FTV sites to be launched and this is one of them. Here's the good things:
I'm a huge FTV fan. I love the public exhibitionism, the amateur feel of the models, the way FTV sets up photography sets, the quality of the videos. I've also preferred models 25-35 for nearly my entire PU-life. So this site could be everything I've been looking for in a porn site.
The split videos are here. Yes, I've argued, debated and complained about them on FTV Girls, but their webmaster is set on them and he produces content I like so I'm adjusting. I'm still taking 5 points off for it, but if that doesn't bother you, go ahead and add 5 points to the score. Think I took 8-10 for it on my last FTV Girls review. The other "problem" is the filename system. It goes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 in each and every set. So, here is my fix that I've been using:
Create a folder of the model's name. In that folder make new folders for the number of sets/scenes the model has. For example, model name, set one, set two, set three, etc... Then use a download manager that allows you to save roughly 20 videos at a time and adjust the folder they are saved in to correspond with the set folder they belong in. By doing this, you offset the filename problem since there's only one 01, 02, 03, 04 in each folder.
One of the best changes the FTV sites have made in recent years is the tagging system. I personally think it's the most useful tagging system I've used. Why? Because it's very simple. The tags are:
1st - Never been in adult before.
Nu! - Public nudity
O - Real orgasms
Dil - Dildo play
Fet - Unique, fetish content
Ex - Extreme content
BB - Naturally busty girl
HC - Hardcore content, boy/girl
SpG - Sporty Girl, includes athletic content.
To top off this handy tagging system, they then list what fetishes, how far the model goes, what act of public nudity, etc...
I think every site should go to a similar tagging system.
Overall, there's a good selection/percentage of 1st time models. By my count, there's 75 models and 23 are 1st time models. There's a fairly decent mixture of body types, but there's not a lot in the way of different ethnicity. I still think finding 23 "MILFs" who have never filmed porn is an impressive number and here's the advantage. The MILFs are more confident than the teens. A lot of the 1st time teens are shy, even backwards and you can tell they have to really push/pull the models to get them to even be comfortable on camera, let alone to be confident on camera. You don't see that as much in this content. Most of the models look like/act like they want to be naked and want people looking at them.
I usually won't do this, but a model that just blew me away on FTV MILFs is Lexi. She is one of the younger models on this site at 28, but she's 5'9" 34E (natural), 26 waist, 34 hips with long, blonde hair. She's one of the few models I've ever seen that I would call stunning. And it's her 1st time on video. Maybe that's where we're at in porn these days. Used to I wanted to see a young model do her first masturbation scene or hardcore scene. Now, I kind of like the idea of the model being late 20s, who has never tried nude modeling, doing her first ever adult video. There's a believable anticipation from these older 1st time models, as if they've wanted to do it all their lives, but are just now getting around to it.
That, to me, is the strongest part of this content. There's something more genuine to it than most porn. Not to write off the teens, but I think even when they're genuine it's just to tease us old men. It makes you wonder how many of these models were told by an ex that they weren't sexual enough or weren't as sexy as the teens their exes watched in porn.
Having said that, there's still not a ton of content here ... yet. But the potential is higher than any site I've been on in a long time.
By my count, based on removing the FTV Girls content that somehow made its way onto this site, there are:
65 sets from FTV MILFs
10 sets carried over from FTV Girls (most of these are 1st time models)
Each set has 200-400 pictures and 1-2 hours of videos.
Of the 65 sets, 13 have hardcore (b/g) parts.
Model ages range from: 24-45, there's one 24, one 26, nearly all the rest are 28-45.
I've long struggled with most porn content. The model is the focus to me and I like models who can arouse with more than their natural, born-with body. Some might call it seduction. Eve Angel stayed my favorite for nearly a decade because of how she looked into the camera. Most of the models here also have that strength. Most of the teen models look at the camera like, "What are you going to do to me?" The models here look at the camera like, "You'll never believe what I'm going to do to you."
I took 5 points off for the split videos and 7 points off for value since it's a small site. Having said that, I can see this becoming my favorite site and a potential high 90s site.
I was always interested in this site for Carolina. Think I will wait though and see if they add more content. Have you heard that Carolina is Sativa Rose's sister? I seen it somewhere on a porn forum. If you have saw Sativa when she was on FTV Girls as Jezebelle, they really do look a lot alike. Thanks for the review.
I had meant to get back to this since you mentioned standalone site. Did you ever get the bonus sites with Fucked Hard 18? When I was a member, there was a link to bonus sites, but all that was on it were a bunch of links with no descriptions of what I was downloading.
If nothing else, I think Fucked Hard 18 could alter their shooting style some. Maybe make the talk/stripping a little longer and add some kind of storyline/dialogue. I just think overall they are too sterile with the scenes. I have this image of someone holding up a placard that says, "2 more minutes of doggystyle!"
Sorry about the delay on the reply. I've found that my views of body types are a good bit different than a lot of porn fans. I'm a huge fan of Cindy and Tia, but always considered them slim. And you threw me off on the Isis Love one. It's an easy to make mistake since it's Isis Taylor, a little lesser known model than Isis Love. And I do agree though, the Isis Taylor scene is my favorite on the site. I think the webmaster of the site tries too hard to stick to that 18 at the end of the site name, which is why so many of the models are of slimmer build. I could see models like Isis Love, Jenaveve Jolie, Sativa Rose having excellent scenes on a site with this niche, but they are all around 30 years old.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons:
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line:
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
I tested each of the servers with a newer scene and these are the results.
Game 57 from North American server downloaded at 2.0 MB/s consistently.
Game 57 from Europe server downloaded at 591 kb/s, dropped as low as 250 kb/s
So that's a really big difference and glad you mentioned the connectivity wizard since I hadn't ever seen that on any other site and hadn't ran it. Once I ran it, it recommended North American server, ultra-hi photos and the 6000 bitrate videos.
On the ones I had downloaded that I commented on in the original comment, those were older games, namely the first 2 with Cindy Hope in them and I ran into the 600-800 kb/s speed on those.
I will edit my original comment to add the tip of running the connectivity wizard. Knowing most porn fans are like me and anxious to download, I bet a lot of members just look over that wizard. I especially like some of the models I've seen in the newer updates. I'm the one who is a big fan of Simony Diamond, so anything with her is good and kind of surprised me since I usually like the taller, more built models like Simony, I really enjoyed game 56 with Lyla Storm and Alexa James, I wasn't familiar with either of these models before seeing this scene and for what it's worth, your site is the first one that features hardcore that my wife likes. She likes the playful nature of your site instead of the typical hardcore these days that have the rougher, more physical parts in them. Thanks again for the tip.
(Added tip) Continues to impress with just one problem
Edited: Webmaster Fucking Gambler recommended running the connectivity wizard, which I found in the account settings. The difference in speed on the newer scenes is around 3-4 times faster for me after running it. Went from the average of 600-800 kb/s to an even 2.0 MB/s by running the connectivity wizard and it switching me to the North American server. So if you're having problems like I listed below, especially with the newer scenes, be sure to check your server download location and run that wizard.
This is my second time being a member here in the last 6 months or so. I continue to like and enjoy the concept of sex games and appreciate the amount of work their staff must put into pulling these games off, making them believable and having a nice blend of models I'm not very familiar with mixed with some pretty big name stars. I was especially happy to see the Cindy Hope scenes.
I will admit though this isn't a problem, I just can't bring myself to download the 1080p @ 12000 bitrate videos. If you haven't been to this site and do join, you'll probably need to look into a new external drive or make some room. I download the 720p @ 3000 bitrate and a few of those random full scenes have ranged from 2.9 GB to 4.1 GB. Even the picture zips are big, with quite a few going over 500 GB. Not that I'm complaining. It is just a heads up to those thinking of joining that you're going to see some big files, some of the 1080p @ 12000 bitrate go over 10 GB for one near 3 hour video.
The one problem I've had this time as a member is the download speed. Yesterday, I had 4 scenes downloading at once at 150-200 kb/s. For a total of 600-800 kb/s. This makes those big files a bit frustrating to download. Oh and my average download speed is between 1600 kb/s and 1800 kb/s, topping out at 2200 kb/s on some sites so we're talking about a substantial difference in the speed I normally download at.
Still, the site itself overall is impressive, especially if you're bored with cookie cutter porn. And though the number of scenes isn't very high, I will say that I have every scene downloaded and plan on keeping all of them.
First of all, I apologize for the delay in my reply. I had actually typed a reply out a few months again when an instant message came in that I was needed at work and had to leave.
Me personally, I don't think a "shorter" version is needed. I do watch the full scenes at least once and fast forwarding isn't really a hassle. Even if a shorter version was available, I would still download the full version.
As for Hungarian models, it can be a bit confusing for us American users since some models are listed as Hungarian on some sites, then we'll see them listed as another nationality on other sites. A few that I know are Hungarian probably wouldn't fit the style of content you all have since they only do girl/girl scenes like Eve Angel, Sophie Moone and Sandra Shine. I'm a big fan of Simony Diamond so anything with her will always be good. Here are a few that I'm pretty sure are Hungarian.
This one goes by Alexa on most sites, some have her as Aleksa Diamond. She does all hardcore and girl/girl that I've seen. Really pretty girl, seems to have a background in dancing of some kind, very limber and great eyes, athletic build.
Another would be Eve Smile, not for sure how hardcore she goes though.
Don't know if Mya Diamond is still in the business, but she, while not the classic look of most Hungarian models, seems to be one of the best in hardcore action.
Not for sure if she is Hungarian, but I'm thinking Sabrina Sweet is and she seems very playful in the sets I've seen of her.
The last three that I'm not entirely for sure about their nationality as it has been listed as multiple countries are.
Regina Ice, Angelica Black and Rihanna Samuel
I bolded their names as listed on Eurobabeindex in case you don't recognize their names. All in all, you all have a very good selection of models and some that I would like to see return like Cindy Hope and Zafira.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting site that pushes the limits on high quality.
- Much to my surprise there are some big Euro stars on here including one of my favorites Simony Diamond who is in multiple "games" or scenes and was the biggest reason I joined.
- The limit pushing video quality has 12,000+ bitrates with 1920x1080 resolution videos. I believe that is probably the top quality in the industry as of right now.
- The games are fun to watch. I've seen a few other sites try doing storylines like these, but not as good and not in all their scenes.
- Each game/set also has zipped pictures.
- I'm getting good DL speeds around 90% my DL speed max.
- Webmaster/staff seems to listen and take requests (reasonable ones) into consideration.
Cons:
- I don't mind the subtitles at all, but some probably will.
- They will most likely be walking a fine line by having major stars on the site with hardly heard of stars. As it seems 50% of porn fans want the established stars, the other 50% wants lesser known stars. I would wonder if this niche is harder to book since so many Euro models are not into talking during their shoots.
- Hate to say it, but as much as I appreciate the hard work put into these videos, I still found myself skipping the game parts once I had watched them once.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that leaves me feeling torn. It may very well show the real divide in porn fans. We want highly original porn and this site does that very well, but their amount of content is small and with just 1 full game update per week, it is growing but not that fast. By the end of the 2010 year they'll have roughly 60 games/sets up. It won't be enough for many porn fans. You can even look ahead and see that at their current pace they won't reach 200 sets until the year 2013. The torn part comes into play since you can tell they put a lot of work into the site, into the production of the video, the quality of the videos and in the believability.
You'll be hard-pressed to find a complaint with the technical quality. In that sense, the site reminds me of one of my all-time favorite niche/high quality sites Give Me Pink. Sadly enough, Give Me Pink just didn't have enough support despite their then industry leading technological quality. Hopefully the word will get off enough to support this site and support the originality they promote with their games.
I haven't experienced any slow periods in download speeds, but I have been downloading just 2 sets/video/pictures per day.
I am glad that they're going to start working more American models in. I prefer Euro models, but I think by adding American models they will be able to bring in a whole new group of members who may not have joined with most of the videos not being in English. Simony Diamond really stars (shines?) in the games she is in. She's one of those Euro models who probably coulda, shoulda been a fashion model or actress in mainstream movies and it shows. I'm not usually noticing the male models, but they have some of the best known male talent in Europe with Thomas Stone and Frank Gunn.
Everything here is of the highest quality, original, technically, excellent performers, then there is the but and it's a big one, you end up wanting more. I would imagine they could add maybe a leased DVD section, but that would bring as many complaints as compliments and we're back to being torn.
Their forum/message board is fun to look over and read as are the comments members leave. One of the future sets will have a member present at the shoot, which is a really nice touch. There are just so many things they are doing right that leads me to giving them an 87 despite the small size. I can't imagine deleting any of the scenes from my hard drive so maybe that's a new pro/con to think about "percent of content kept". This is going to be a 100% one. I think if you're looking for something different, original, somewhat funny, then you'll like this site. Though I think my own shallow-mindedness shows when reviewing this site since I admit Simony is the big draw for me even over the originality.
I'm still going to recommend this site since you could do much worse. It's almost like a Behind the Scenes shoot of models playing a game that turns into an orgy. Recommended.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
