I don't think any of their sites are updating any longer. I had talked with a site rep or webmaster who said their costs were too much to keep filming new content at the high technical quality that they were filming in. I don't know if that's true or not, but as a side note, can't guarantee this either, but when I was last a member it was when they had stopped updating. When I went to cancel after 2 weeks as a member, it gave me the option to transfer my remaining 2 weeks to any of their other sites. Kind of making it like a network except you had to go through the switching sites part.
New bit of eroticism, other sites should take note!
I was just going through the Give Me Pink videos that I downloaded last month, and as I got into the newer videos, I started noticing something that was new to me in solo porn and I have to say that my thoughts were, "Why hasn't someone thought of this before?"
What is it you ask? The cameraman is a woman, and instead of having the man talking and asking stupid questions, the woman behind the camera says things like, "You have a perfect body" and you can tell that the models really like this! This camerawoman also touches the models and even fingers some of them. This adds a whole new dimension to porn for me and maybe is the end of the typical guy talking trying to make jokes. I didn't download all the content, so I don't know when they added this woman behind the camera, but it is a genius idea, the Anita Pearl and Wivien videos are probably the two best of these newer ones. Wivien really seems to like the attention the female videographer is giving her!
Just found out, this is the first time I've seen this
I went to cancel my membership at Give Me Pink, it still has 10 days left on the account, but I like to cancel ahead of time. When you go to cancel it offers to transfer your remaining days to one of the other DEV sites, Prime Cups, All Internal etc...
I haven't tried it so I don't know if you could keep doing this throughout the membership, maybe a week at a time on each of their four sites, but I do really like this option and hope other sites will consider doing this in the future.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-22-0911:34pm (Update History) Reason: Site stopped updating in Feb 2009, still great quality, for amount of archived content can't hold a 94 without new updates.
Pros:
- Has to be one of the highest quality sites on the internet.
- Model selection is very good, nearly all top Euro models have at least 1 set, some have as many as 4.
- Picture sets are some of the most complete that I have seen. You can download a zip of the high res photos, and/or a set of screenshots from each set. Will explain more in BL
- Videos do vary a bit, older ones have the highest option of 512 high end with 1500 bitrate, newer ones have 4 options that range from a small mpg to full HD 1920x1080 with 8000 bitrate.
- Very download manager friendly, especially if you just allow 1 DL to run at a time, I had 38 files in mine (1 DL at time, others cued up) last night and those were done without any errors
- DL speed is 99% my max speed
- Navigation is very clean and neat with well-placed buttons for video, pictures, screenshots for each set
Cons:
- Can be repetitive, as most solo sites do become repetitive.
- If you plan on getting the Full HD files be prepared to look into an external hard drive, files near 2 GB each, not a con for me, but could be for some.
- Some of the older sets especially do have some different content, like speculum, shooting milk from their butts, the good thing is, most of this is at the end of the videos which are usually 30 minutes+ each
Bottom Line:
This is my updated review of Give Me Pink. I do agree with Denner that there are some shots that might be a little too close-up for some tastes, but overall, I really like the content. I just skip the weird parts.
This site, has nearly every major Euro model that I know of. Here are some of the major Euro stars and number of sets they have: Eve Angel (4), Peaches (4) Sandra Shine (2), Sophie Moone (2), Zafira (2), Gianna/Ginger B (3), Cindy Hope (3), Eve Smile (2), Simony, Anita Pearl and Suzie Carina all have 1 set and there are 100+ more models. In each of these sets is a 30 minute video, high res picture set usually 50 or so pictures, screenshots that number up to 300, for each set.
That to me is very complete.
The picture sets are worth noting. I can't give an exact date, but it has been over a year, that the picture sets come with a high res set that is 2250 high end and screenshots that are 1900 high end. When you download the screenshots you get both a folder with the 1900 high end ones and another folder with 1024 high end copies. I would guess this is for those who are looking to save some hard drive space and want to keep the smaller ones.
What is amounts to, to me, is that this site especially over the last year gives you nearly everything you could possibly ask for. The extremely high quality true HD videos, the 2250 high res zipped photos, the high end 1900 screenshots that are also zipped.
I think that puts me in a bind. I don't care for the extreme content of a beautiful woman squirting milk 10 feet from her butt, but the quality makes it impossible for me to score low. I guess if the whole video focused on the extreme, I would knock some off the score, but a large portion of the videos are of these often considered timid, glamour softcore Euro models masturbating in very intense hardcore fashion.
I think what I'm trying to say is that this site shows you a side of these gorgeous runway quality models being very kinky.
Another plus for me is that these models seem to really enjoy working with this site. You get a lot of big playful smiles from them in the sets and they look like they are having fun and enjoying it.
As you can see, there is very little, outside of personal preferences, to dislike about this site. The specs on the videos are as high as any site and the several options for videos really push it up near the top. I would score it higher, but would love to see them take another step up and remaster the older videos, at least to 960 high end.
Note that I only download the 1900 high end videos of my favorite models. They have a nice 960 high end, 5000 bitrate wmv that is smaller, but still higher quality than the vast majority of sites offer.
If you're a fan of Peaches, her sets here are amazing. As are 90% of the models. The only real negative is one update per week. If they could maybe squeeze one remastered update in I would be considering an even higher score! Recommended.
Thanks and thanks also to PU. I had been using TBP for a good while, probably a year or so before they started PU. I think this site and raffle are both great ideas.
Veronica Vanoza, PixandVids has a solo set and a b/g set. ClubSandy has a b/g set. 1byday has the most, 13 sets, 9 solo sets, 3 g/g sets and 1 b/g/g set. Several of those sets are with the short hair. They have the g/g set with Silvia Saint as well.
I always liked her as well, she reminds me of Lora Craft, who also has gone through the very short hair stage as well. I haven't been on ATK lately, so I'm not for sure how much they had of Veronica. 1byday is great if you have never tried it, it has an entire hardcore section, an entire lez section as well plus all of the models solo and machine/toy section. You can go to 1byday and click on "DDF Model List" it will then give you the letters so you can search and see the 13 sets. I've found that 1byday has a better selection of different models than the others, but my preference stayed with pixandvids because of the massive amount of Eve Angel they along with Club Sandy have. When I re-join ATK, I will review it and throw a mention in about Veronica and how much content they have.
I was in the same group as you. I had seen those high quality samples last year, but there wasn't many models on it, now things have really picked up. Be sure to check out Peaches. I always found her to be a very pretty, incredibly built (except boobs) woman, but never seen much emotion from her. The scene with the white dress on is one of the best I have seen of any model, great teasing in it and she gets into it. Maybe that is it, maybe the teasing got her worked up. I have enjoyed it more than I expected I would, not usually into the extreme penetrations, but there is something about the site that I like. It is hard to explain, thanks for replying.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good selection of Europe's best models doing some pretty extreme insertions.
- Very high quality videos, even the pictures have a glossy look to them (may be my eyes playing tricks on me)
- Good amount of content, upwards of 140-150 models, vids are long and the HD ones are huge in file size.
Cons:
- Some of the insertions are more than I like to see.
- A little high for any consideration of more than one month membership at a time.
Bottom Line:
Let me start off by saying that I am lactose intolerant, meaning I get deathly sick if I digest something with a dairy product in it. What does that have to do with this review? Some of the shoots have the women squirting milk out of the butts, you also get the extreme sized dildos being shoved in some of the prettiest women you will ever see, Sophie and Eve are both on here as are 130 more.
My problem comes in that while I like to see these beautiful women enjoying themselves for us to watch, I don't like seeing them look like they are tearing their guts out. I understand it is an original idea and believe me, I still watch! I'm just giving a heads up for those who haven't been on the site. Overall, it is great, tons of teasing to start the videos which are almost all over 30 minutes each. I think the teasing is very important, especially when you know they are going to finally take it off. It builds you up. Videographer is one lucky man/woman on this site. Extreme close-ups, has some speculum vids and pics for you all that have the medical fetish. I really could do without the milk squirting videos, but it is usually only the last minute or so of the video and isn't the main focus.
I very much recommend it, especially if you have never been a member. I think this site shows Peaches in a way that you have probably never seen her. She really gets into her vids on here and is worth the monthly price just by herself. Add those other 140 or so models, recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge site, especially considering that it comes with two other sites if you sign up through Crissy Moran's site.
- Haven't went through the 1,000+ scenes yet to see if all are, but all of the videos I've downloaded are coming up in 640 resolution. Which according to standards is now considered DVD resolution.
- Tons of models, Eva Angelina, Audrey Bitoni, Anetta Keys, Antianna Amarillo (had trouble finding much of her anywhere else!)
- Got to love a site that says "still no ugly chicks"
Cons:
- Non exclusive content, but I haven't seen most of the content that I have downloaded so far
- Pictures could be bigger
Bottom Line:
I signed up for Crissy Moran's site, and this site and Amateur Models Gone Bad came with it. When I opened this Glamour site for the first time, I was expecting your usual 3rd rate cheap site, only to find out that it could easily stand on its own.
Note, if you have been on many sites like this one, some of this content may not be new to you. I noticed in each review on TBP that each reviewer listed that it isn't exclusive content, but since a lot of my viewing is on individual sites, the content of this many models is new to me. The navigation is very easy to use with a models page that lists each model and shows a good size thumbnail of each. The videos are really nice looking, I have to wonder at what point are we asking too much when a site has over 1,000 videos, and we are still asking for higher than DVD resolution for $24.95.
The pictures could be better/bigger, but they aren't that bad, considering it comes off more as a video site anyway. The good news is that the pictures are available in zip sets and do have upwards of 100 pics per set.
I keep going back to what is and what isn't exclusive, with so many models, I have to think that at least some of it is going to be new to the members. I know that I hadn't found hardly any content of Antianna Amarillo, and found her very attractive, so her section was my first to visit.
Very good site overall, especially if you are a fan of Crissy Moran, and get this site free with hers. I recommend it based on that!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I have always liked Gloryhole scenes and honestly didn’t realize this site is on the same network as Gloryhole.com.
- They do something on this site that I like and that is the opposite of the better-known Gloryhole.com site, they have a lot of black girls with white guys.
- It also surprised me that they have 341 scenes. The updating is still happening but it looks like they are inconsistent with it. There were two new updates in October 2020.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max)
- Navigation on the site is good as well as the network being easy to switch from site to site.
- They use Epoch as the biller and usually will offer you a discounted price when you go to cancel.
Cons:
- The older scenes have 480p as the largest downloadable file.
- I think some of these women are amateurs and they look like women you could find in a truck stop bathroom. Maybe that should be a pro since it’s believable?
Bottom Line:
Many years ago, I was in undergraduate school (late 90s) and I remember some of the students warning about the public restrooms on campus. I hadn’t ever heard of a gloryhole but that’s what they were calling it back then too. The difference being, the ones doing the pleasuring were older, male professors. I can remember other students saying, “Life is like a gloryhole, you stick your dick in it and never know what you’re going to get.”
I guess the appeal of seeing mostly attractive women being what you get on the other side of the gloryhole has always intrigued me. I think the politically correct television show, “What would you do?” should set up some gloryholes and see how women respond to a dick popping through a hole in the bathroom stall.
There’s very little difference from scene to scene. There are some scenes that turn into sex through the gloryhole instead of just a blowjob. I think it took the gloryhole sites a few years to realize they could pull off sex. I can see a producer having that Eureka moment. The negative with the ones that turn into sex is the camera angle. You either get the side view which only shows the penetration if they woman is flexible enough to lift her leg high enough for you to see or you get the down under camera angle that’s looking up at the sex. That angle sometimes takes a few seconds to realize what you’re looking at. I do think the niche is starting to wear thin. Maybe there’s a new twist they could throw on it?
You do get a large collection here with 341 scenes. Besides videos they do offer downloadable zipped photo sets. The technical quality does have a few problems. The older scenes only offer 480p as the largest download option and the newer scenes have the $4 per 4K scene option if you want 4K. The quality varies over the years with most of the scenes at least offering 720p and the newer ones having 720p and 1080p.
The best part to me is a lot of the newer scenes have a black woman with a white man. The older scenes didn’t incorporate that version of interracial. It is an underrepresented niche in porn as far as I’m concerned. As I say that, the network itself has a site listed as new called, We Fuck Black Girls.
I do think this site is only good for those into gloryhole/voyeur type sites. Most of the women do a good job of making it believable that they are really into the scenes. It’s another site I don’t think could stand on its own but as part of a large network it’s a nice site worth checking out.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest online porn niche sites (first scene was 2003).
- Classic scenario (gloryhole) brought into the internet age except the taboo is white women with black men.
- 651 scenes up to 1080p download (details on resolution in Bottom Line).
- Photos/screencaps available for download.
- Simplistic navigation but requires a lot of clicking.
- Epoch is the biller.
- Still updating every two weeks.
Cons:
- The common con of heavy-niche content becoming repetitive applies here, though they and others have tried to add more to this niche.
- The dull scenes, this niche, maybe more than any in porn should bring out some kind of primal excitement from the female or fear but some of the models on here show no excitement or taboo stimulation.
- Not a con for me but if you want 4K you're going to have to pay $3.99 to $4.99 PER scene.
Bottom Line:
This site and Blacks and Blondes were two very important sites in my online porn interests. There was an old TGP site that had 5-10 second clips of porn scenes (early 2000s) and Blacks on Blondes and Gloryhole were two of the sites often featured. They would put 2-4 of these 5-10 second clips up for download and you would then have to merge them or load them in a playlist to watch them in correct order.
I was only early 20s though I had been exposed to porn (VHS/DVD/Magazines) for years. Gloryhole was probably the first I had seen that had a niche or story to it. At the time, I was also an undergraduate student and remember the university I was attending at the time actually having "real" gloryhole "problems" in some of the less used buildings. Those real ones were more for gay men like the married professor who would go to one of the gloryhole restrooms to get or give a blowjob to or from a college guy. Keeping in mind, "gay" was not as mainstream back then as was taboo for a heterosexual married male with children to risk getting caught in a restroom with another male.
I later heard of couples that wanted to experience something different using it as a way to experience swinger life without going full swinger.
The scenes here follow a fairly repetitive format. The big difference between scenes is the female model. Some are there to collect a check. Some will masturbate a little before starting the blowjob through the wall. Some do a good job of making you feel like they're genuinely excited, others don't. It is the upside and downside of Gloryhole porn. There's not a lot of middle ground. The scenes either seem to be near perfect or barely watchable.
Someone did come up with the idea of adding sex through the gloryhole. This is also hit or miss. If the cameraperson is unable to get a good angle, all you see is the side of the woman bouncing back and forth into a wall. Other times the cameraperson gets a closeup and steady view of the penetration.
Considering how long this site has been around their collection is not that large with only 651 scenes in 17 years. That's less than an average of one new scene per week since its start. On the other hand, this is not a common niche. I remember once searching gloryhole scenes on a DVD site and finding maybe 8.
They have tried multiple variations of the blowjob through the hole in the wall from sex through the hole in the wall to multiple guys.
The ones I seem to like the best are the ones where the woman is giving a blowjob through the gloryhole while fingering herself.
There's not much to complain about with the site and quality unless you want 4K. These are exact numbers, the most recent 190 scenes have up to 1080p and also have the purchasable 4K upgrade for each of those 190 scenes. The 220 scenes before those had up to 720p. The other roughly 50% scenes are 480p and below.
I do think they could have done something to fix the disparity in quality. A mass remastering of all those 480p and below scenes up to 720p (minimum) would make the content on this site very collectible being a rare niche usually filmed in poor to average quality.
As it is, it's an above average site with what is becoming a repetitive niche just because of the limitations the wall presents. That shouldn't take away from its importance in porn history as a site that was taking major chances nearly 20 years ago.
Put the url of the site into the "translate" box, then just click Russian to English and it will loosely translate it for you. It at least makes it easier to read and get an idea of what all it says.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the premier old/young sites in my opinion.
- 260 scenes, but some are bonus scenes that are not downloadable.
- Has been averaging 3 updates per month with 1 being a bonus scene.
- 4K available since late 2017.
- Downloadable photo sets and everything is unlimited.
- Mostly cute female models that look completely out of place with these older males.
- The bonus scenes, while not downloadable are streaming and they are from other sites so those could be seen as useful.
Cons:
- Lacking in navigational features. No model lists, no update schedule, categories are not as accurate as they should be. It's not a major con since the site isn't huge but I'm known for small problems like these to annoy me.
- Would like to see more group scenes or threesomes. I personally liked Grandparents X better in that regard.
- Doing the double pro/con on the bonus scenes. They're mixed in with the regular updates.
Bottom Line:
Granddadz would have been my pick as the best of the younger/older sites if not for GrandparentsX. From the way I see the content on Granddadz it used to be the site Beauty and the Senior.
The scenes are standard for the genre. Others have mentioned the older men possibly being limited as to what they can do in scenes and it does seem that way. It's not to take away from the scenes, if I'm able to handle a young women in her 20s, when I'm in my 60s and 70s, I'll be very proud of myself!
The navigation and layout problems do hurt it a little. One in every 4 scenes (a row) is a bonus scene and most of them are not younger/older content. I've seen bonus scenes from Team Skeet, All Internal/Perfect Gonzo and those are in the way, is how I see them. No model list if you find a model you like, you can't look to see if they have any other scenes.
The quality helps make up for it. Besides having 4K back to December 2017, every other scene before the 4K started, has 540p, 720p and 1080p plus downloadable pics/screencaps. I didn't put this as a con since I rarely stream videos but the videos can not be skipped forward when streaming unless I'm doing something wrong.
My general feeling towards these older/younger scenes is I need a younger female in the scene. I know there are a few sites that have older women with younger guys, I don't particularly care for those scenes. Which is a strength here as the scenes are older men with teen/20-something women.
I think the scenes, in this genre, being believable is an important part. In general, the girls/women seem to be impressed or flattered that the old guys can get it up for them and perform. A few of them women don't give a good performance and seem to just be there to collect a check. Overall though, it's believable. A few of the old guys seem to be more appealing to the women.
There's not much story here. Some of the scenes will also make you feel like you're lost. One of the newest scenes is under 20 minutes, two older guys (70s, I would guess) are laying in their hospital beds in the same room. A cute nurse comes in, kisses with both of the men, gives them views up her skirt, some blowjob action, the scene then seems to edit to the two men giving her oral and it ends. That goes back to me mentioning not being able to forward during the streaming. I had downloaded the 720p version of it so I'm wondering if the scene has a full video option on one of the other resolutions as this one seems to be missing some of the scene.
It's still a good site as the older scenes go for full scenes with oral, vaginal, cumshot. I would rank it as the best of the older/younger content based on quantity and quality. Grandparents X was for me a better overall site but it had less than 40 scenes on it. Good overall site that could be better with a few tweaks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Older/younger porn which I didn't expect since it's GrandparentsX. Some major fetishes explored here.
- Up to 4K on the video downloads, also 1080, 720 and 540.
- 35 videos and 34 photo sets, no download limits. While the amount of content is low, I downloaded every scene and have kept them for the fetishes they go into (will explain in BL). Also has 8 videos that I guess are from another of their sites, you can only stream those.
- The younger female models are very attractive, I would say top-tier quality.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- No ads but they do list scenes from their other sites.
Cons:
- Small collection. This is the only reason the score isn't higher.
- Sporadic updates, each of the last two months only have one official update with both months also having a "bonus" update you can stream. In January, they had 3 updates. December only had 1 official and 1 "bonus".
- Scenes could be longer, 4 people in a 22 minute scene is a little shorter than I would like.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those sites that appealed to me simply because I saw some of the fetishes it includes.
I'm not a big fan of old and young porn. Especially when it's one older person with one younger person. I don't see the taboo of it and am not quite old enough to really enjoy older men with younger women.
But this site, it has threesomes and foursomes. This means you see scenes where a younger guy is pounding away at a much older woman while his pretty, young girlfriend masturbates while watching them. There are scenes that go into swinging with young couples switching partners with an older couple.
This reminds me of the type or porn that breaks a mold. It's one I've talked about before. They are adding a voyeur into the scene as one watches. My favorite DVD series of the last 20 years was "The Watcher" by Vivid. This site touches on that fetish.
A bonus is all of the older people are not unattractive. Some of the women look similar to women you would see on Anilos.
Still, it needs more updates. The reason I'm not a porn site owner is I would put this high on my priority list and have a minimum of 4 updates per month.
The numbers aren't impressive with only 35 videos and unless my counting is wrong, 34 photo sets. The quality of the videos is excellent. Every video has 4K and the site has only been updating since November 2018.
It seems their initial plan was to have it be older/younger women as the first 3 scenes they updated with were just females. After those, they started adding older and younger men. All of the non-bonus scenes have more than 2 people in them. With the most being 5 people.
It's a site with a lot of potential in my eyes. But not everyone sees things the way I do. I think playing to the voyeur watching (viewer) by putting a voyeur in the scene give the viewer a feeling of she or he is doing the same thing I'm doing.
The site also comes with a streaming network of over 14,000 videos. It's not of much use to me but I thought I should mention it. This one falls under the quality/quantity amount of value heading. I downloaded 35 videos I'm likely to keep all of. That is more than I can say for a lot of sites with 10,000 scenes and I do think it's because of the fetish. For years, porn has tried threesomes with all 3 people involved directly in the sex for the entire scene. That formula is stale for me. This site gives me something I haven't seen done on a regular basis since the early 2000s. I would like to go higher on the score. I could always use the old there's 35 scenes, that would equal 7 DVDs so it's still a good value thought.
I think it is and you should check the previews out if you're curious.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite niches of porn, the competition, playful games, some of these scenes are from the once legendary Fucking Gamble site.
- Over 300 downloadable scenes.
- Photo downloads, which are very useful in this niche similar to how photos help with exhibitionism videos. There are things you miss in videos.
- Updates every week but see cons.
- 408 models with some scenes having as many as 4-5 in one scene.
- The outdoor scenes far overshadow the indoor ones.
- Download speed is very good (about 80-85%) worth mentioning as some scenes are big files.
- The oldest scenes I do believe are from Fucking Gamble and some are as long as 3 hours.
Cons:
- Newer scenes don't have much of a "game" twist to them and are much shorter, some are less than 20 minutes, a sharp contrast from a 3 hour scene.
- The indoor scenes take a lot of the exhibitionism/voyeurism feel out of the scenes.
- The oldest scenes which are the best only go up to 720p, which is my preference but I know some prefer 1080p.
Bottom Line:
A big part of my high score is for the first 100 or so scenes. To have scenes that have actual competitions and last over 2 hours each is like having a full DVD of porn in one scene. I hope I'm not crossing any lines by saying some of the scenes are from Fucking Gamble, a site long loved by Porn User members in the early years of Porn Users. I'm more looking to make others aware of those scenes being on here.
Admittedly, some of those scenes are too long and too drawn out but it was unlike any porn, even other game porn sites. There's a naked croquet scene, a strip version of basketball that turns into an all out orgy with the only downside being some of those top out at 720p but their file sizes even at 720p are 10GB+, the ones that have 1080p are in the 15GB - 20GB range. These were legitimate games being played though most looked planned since everyone eventually ends up naked.
The models are often top-tier from the 2010-2014 era and you get a feeling some of them were really into the competition. It would then come out in their sexual performance.
The newer scenes seem to be more focused on indoor group sex, the scenes are much shorter, to give an example, the three newest scenes are 19, 13 and 35 minutes. If you go to the oldest scenes, the 3 oldest are 2 hours or more each. The longest I've seen was nearly 4 hours.
I think that is important to know before joining. It's almost like a tale of two different sites. Some of the newer scenes are good, especially if you're into gangbangs, blowbangs, but if you're here for the game scenes you're going to want to go to the oldest updates and work your way forward.
The quality overall is good, none of the scenes have 4K, but I'm going to estimate 90% have up to 1080p, they also have 720p and 540p on all scenes.
One of the best parts of the older scenes for me is the models are all dressed in regular clothes that fits the setting. If it's a pool party they might have on bikinis or tank tops and shorts. You get a lot of teasing between the start of the scene and up to fully nude.
The screen capture sets play a big role too. Most have between 300-400 screencaps. These often catch a model starting to strip, showing cameltoe and those things you miss in moving video.
There is, to my surprise, a model list. It surprises me because some scenes have as many as 4-5 women and 3-5 guys. There are well-known models like Annie Cruz, Abbie Cat, Adriana Luna, Angel Dark, Anne Marie Rios and I'm stopping as I'm making myself feel old since most of these models are no longer active.
I would call those older scenes some of porn's most creative and most historically important as it showed what a lot of us wondered about back in the early 2010s, were porn fans just wanting sex and pulling away from creativity and sites that were really trying to be different?
We know the answer now. You don't see porn like these older scenes anymore and that makes them very good to me. I could have done without the newer scenes and still would have scored it in the 90s.
I rarely say much more about the download speed than a mention in the pros or cons but these scenes are downloading very fast for me which as you probably know is important when you're talking about a 15GB+ scene.
A great site overall and if they ever started shooting the long, game style scenes again, that would probably get my only 100.
Hey SD, my favorites in the classics are mostly early 90s material. Back when Asia Carrera first started out. I remember the 80s porn from raiding my uncle's stash, but I didn't turn 18 until the early 90s. I noticed on DVD Box that they have around 50 "classic" DVDs now, so I do think it is catching on. I also downloaded a clip the other day of Nina Hartley, remember her? The clip I downloaded though was a new one of her being a dom. She still looks good. My favorite though and the one that turned my attention to exotic women, Jasmin St. Claire, strangest thing, I was looking up her bio the other day to find out we are born on the same day of the same year.
I have enjoyed this site. I did try two other sites from the same company. Fellatio Japan was one and thought it was pretty good, but would have been much better with subtitles.
My newest review of Legs Japan is also from the same company and it's kind of hit or miss from scene to scene. I would recommend Japan HDV for a good priced alternative with more than 10 sites in its network and the scenes on the main site have subtitles.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very erotic, uncensored, Japanese handjob site.
- It’s probably worth taking the cross-sale offer, they offer Fellatio Japan for $2.95 for 2 days, recurs at $19.95/mo. Fellatio Japan is $35 normally.
- High quality throughout, videos all have up to 1080p with 8000 bitrate, they also have 720p and 540p options.
- Very good photo/screencaps coming in at 5760x3840 and are downloadable in zips.
- There are 240 scenes and every one of them is worth downloading.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Vendo is the biller which is why I said it’s safe to take the cross-sale, if you don’t like Fellatio Japan you could easily cancel it before the 2 days are up.
- Clean navigation with simple buttons and the forever scroll feature.
Cons:
- They posted a message in May, that said they would no longer be updating the site. I don’t know if it’s Coronavirus-related or if it includes their other sites but 240 exclusive handjob scenes like these is a lot.
- Handjob porn always has this problem. Some of the women are very good with their hand. Others are not and those are usually the best since they turn to teasing the guy’s dick with their butt or pussy.
Bottom Line:
This was an impulse join. After watching so many censored Japanese porn films and seeing how much the women seemed to love dicks, I wanted to see uncensored. It shows on this site and I’m guessing on Fellatio Japan too. You see a lot of frenulum stimulation (thumb and tongue), the girls giggle and speak in Japanese with no subtitles. See, Zenra spoiled me with those subtitles. I have no idea what they’re saying, but they look happy and excited.
I would compare this directly to a site like Manojobs. It is shot from a POV camera of the man. Nearly half of the scenes have two Japanese women in them. There is plenty of female nudity and teasing too. Some of these models seem like they are just made for this type of porn from rubbing the dick to lightly blowing on it after letting a little saliva drip on the head. The eroticism is higher here than any handjob site I have seen.
I don’t know how much we are going to have to start taking into consideration the pandemic. This content is not only very good in action, but every video has up to 1080p resolution and the pictures are as big and clear as some of the top photo sites.
My favorite part between this site and other handjob sites is the way the models smile. I’m not trying to be negative about American models but we all have seen the look of anger or frustration from American models when trying to get the guy to cum. These Japanese models seem to like it the longer it takes.
I will probably end up trying Fellatio Japan just because this site has impressed me so much.
The only real complaint about the scenes is I would like to see all the models do the teasing with their body, not just with their hand. That’s about as minimal of a complaint as you can have.
There are 240 videos, just over 100 models, so that kind of gives you an idea of how many scenes have two models in them. A few of the models also have more than one scene.
I would recommend it to those who like handjobs, teasing, lots of smiles and seeing women who look to be very into the scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
I'm not really for sure on exact percentage because the older videos are split and they count them as 4 movies since it is 4 clips. Seems like if memory serves me they went to HD around the same time DDF did at 1byday, which was early summer. So probably 40-50 full length HD ones. It is a great site if you like hardcore, and if you are familiar with 1byday's videos, the older ones are on par with the older ones on 1byday which isn't bad, I believe 640x480.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- HD Videos of some very good hardcore action
- Price has dropped to a reasonable $29.95, probably was reasonable at $39.95 considering the quality and quanity of content.
- Covers nearly all niches that are expected from DDF, b/g, anal, blowjob, group. Great group one that has Lucky in it!
- Very nice big pictures in zipped files
- Most of your favorite Euro models are here and some have as many as 5-10 movies each
Cons:
- Not much, maybe a little nitpicking that the site isn't quite as good for me personally as 1byday, DDF's all-around site.
- The older videos that are segemented are probably the only true complaint
Bottom Line:
The first thing I thought when I downloaded a HD video from here was, "This is very similar to Hardcore Fridays on 1byday". I was reminded again that though I like Hardcore as much as the next guy, I seem to prefer the solo aspects. Don't take that wrong, I think this is one of the best hardcore sites I have ever been on. DDF is rarely going to put out a product that isn't high quality.
Having said that, I prefer 1byday. I don't think DDF minds which one I like though, as long as I like one of them! One of the things that I like about this site is that if I'm in a mood for something hardcore, I don't have to try and find it. There are some truly hardcore sex scenes on here. None of the vanilla, ooh, ooh, ooh stuff. I'm talking legs spread, man going as fast as possible and a puddle of sweat on the bed or floor.
Though I am 100% straight, I do have to say that DDF gets some of the best men to do these women. Which as any porn fan knows is important because we have all seen the Ron Jeremy clips were the women look like they are going to puke. The women in these videos look geniunely enthused and horny. Which is probably the most important part for any hardcore site. Keep in mind, many of these models are also glamour models. The one thing I miss is the machine videos from 1byday. And the overall variety of 1byday.
Even so, this site is highly recommended for hardcore fans. You get around 600 videos, over 50,000 pics and around 10 updates per month. Great site!
jd1961, don't you just love when you can spend a month on a site and not be bored with it? I've had so many subscriptions where after the first few weeks, I don't go back for the last two weeks. I will probably join up HOH next week, still have a couple of subscriptions running right now and the wife will complain if I get too many!
First, thank you for the quick response and my apology for not getting back sooner. As I replied to Khan here at PU, I was hoping that someone from DDF would respond and give me a clear explanation, and you did just that.
That sounds really great with the editing. I had seen a video of an American porn star that was one clip, but had been edited and sold as 3 separate niche clips. Good news for me, I have never been a member on DDF Busty, so all of those clips will be new for me as well.
I'm kind of a porn snob, I like certain models and usually only join a site if they have at least one of those top 5 models for me. I seem to have similar favorites as Denys has, so I trust in his picks for the Busty ones.
You threw me off course with the re-launch of 1byday! I will still probably check out HOH for a month before running back to 1byday! DDF is picking the right time to start making a move on the Euro porn market, with the other big Euro supplier of online porn, getting a little in over their heads with too many sites, DDF has the chance to pass them up.
Hey Khan, I have noticed that TBP is the most accurate of the review sites, and another part I have noticed about the exclusive part is to check each separate review of the 4 reviewers. My main goal for posting the question was to see if a webmaster would respond and give me some exact numbers, which they did.
Which hopefully more users will take the oppurtunity to ask about sites and get nice, helpful answers like I did from Bela. It really shows that the webmasters are doing their best to give their customers a fair deal.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
