Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It plays to one of my biggest fetishes
- It also has some of the prettiest models around
- There is great softcore content including teasing and stripping
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max
- It’s similar to the old-school glam sites
- Good solo camerawork, seen most when the models’ make eye contact with the camera
Cons:
- It’s still way too quiet.
- The quietness all but ruins the production and realism for me.
Bottom Line:
I have had the dressing room fetish for a very long time. I used to stand, like most husbands, holding the bags, while their wife tried on clothes. Sometimes, my mind would drift off. I would wonder what that one woman looks like who was in the dressing room beside the dressing room my wife was in. Sure, it’s perverted but most fetishes are. I even progressed in the fetish by talking my wife and eventually,, a few future girlfriends, into sending me selfies from inside the dressing room. Yes, the girlfriends came after divorcing the first wife.
This fetish can be frustrating. Finding a dressing room where you and the other person are comfortable with sending nude or tease photos from is harder than you would expect. It can be done and be done with complete respect for anyone else in the store. That’s the biggest problem with Fitting Rooms. If these models really are in a fitting room, they must have a ton of respect for the other patrons. They’re quiet, there is little to no noise that comes with store dressing rooms, like hangers clanking, items being dropped, people chattering.
I wouldn’t have joined Fitting Room for a second time if not for their great models. Everything is there for this site to be one of my favorites, maybe even favorite. The videos can be downloaded and zipped photosets too. The scenes are reminiscent of early 2000s tease and solo scenes. The models even dance around inside the fitting room, but there’s missing noise. It lacks the ambiance of a dressing room.
I described it once before as it sounds like the models are standing inside a box.
It’s still not a complete waste. The models are still great. The site does not cater to a certain age or body type of models. You get a mix of models, ages and body types, which is exactly how a fitting room site should be. The model strips, sits down, complete quietness, slides her toy in her and lets out a huge moan. That’s not a realistic sound for someone masturbating in public. Women try to be quiet and do it quietly, which is one of the hottest parts since there will be times they can’t stop themselves from letting out a muffled moan. I can imagine all the potential problems with making the site and scenes the way I want them. I’m sure licensing fees would be needed for any copyrighted music and I’m not for sure how much money is available in the porn budget for random people chattering. That’s why I said it’s not a complete waste.
This is a fetish I have experience with and because of that, I have a standard that I believe the fetish should live up to.
I believe others could really enjoy this site. The models are some of the best I have seen and the women do seem to really enjoy the fitting room fetish. Just don’t approach it like me and expect the models to do what you want them to do. Maybe it’s better for me that the site doesn’t nail the fetish for me? Great site worth taking a look into.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those niches I wish had more representation in porn.
- Very pretty models, they seem to be selective in the models.
- Updates have slowed over the last few months but they still have at least one new scene per week.
- Most models have multiple scenes, sets and outfits.
- Three download options on videos, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
- Downloadable photo sets, very high, professional quality.
- Various ages, doesn't seem to stick to any age group.
Cons:
- The last time I reviewed this site I gave a tip in it and they didn't listen. This is supposed to be women in a fitting room. There should be some noise or chatter. I was hoping they had fixed that but they haven't.
- Very little diversity in the models except for age. Nearly all models are white and slender.
- Needs a boost of oomph, scenes seem clinical at times.
Bottom Line:
As an admitted fetishist of dressing room porn, I honestly believe you could give me the controls of a site like this and I could make it into a top site.
Years ago, one of my exes would send me pictures from the dressing room in a store. It seriously became a near obsessive fetish of mine. I was the dumbass saying, "Go try on some more clothes" knowing I would have to pay for them if she liked them.
What that site is to me is a new twist on solo porn. For roughly half of the video the model changes clothes, poses, takes pictures of herself and this is supposed to be turning her on. After 10 minutes of this teasing, she sits down or sometimes stands and masturbates.
On that part of it they do fine. The dressing room part is mostly lost. These are critical to a scene playing to this fetish:
Outside noise. What good is it to masturbate in an indoor dressing room if you don't believe someone is just outside the door?
Attempted holding in of moans. There's none of that here. These women are moaning like they are in the privacy of their bedroom with no one within 1,000 ft of them.
Have them nude while opening the door. I do like that they vary the panties, the pantyhose, the outfits, and they have some really pretty models.
I think the easiest way to point out the biggest negative is it's like there is no thought or production. I think I described it before as the model is just sitting inside a box on a set. When you do fetish content, how believable it is, is very important.
The numbers show 153 scenes which is much higher than when I was last here and they only had 58. I don't like bashing the model choices but they started out this site with Apolonia and Lil' Caprice. They're still the two models I know on the site. Most of these other models are completely new to me but I'm sure they're not amateurs.
Their technical quality is as good as you can ask for. Every scene has 720p, 1080p and 4K resolution videos. The photos are almost 6000 long end and downloadable.
They're doing so much right it's just the content isn't as good as it could be. This comes across as a very softcore site but it's not. There's anal play, dildos, Magic Wands, it's moderate level or higher masturbation.
I think they would even be better off just forgetting the dressing room part. This is going to be a bad analogy but it's like a site calling itself shower masturbation. And the person gets in the shower without turning the shower on and masturbates.
You could probably say this is the exact type site that's not good for obsessive people. It's still a good, solo, panties, pantyhose, masturbation site with some of the best technical standards.
As far as I know there are two types of dressing room fetishes. One is what this site does. You get to watch what goes on in the dressing room. The other is, the risk, almost exhibitionism, taboo style and of course that would be the one I'm into.
I think my score is somewhat objective. I try to bring as much subjectivity to reviews as I can but I'm sure there's people into this and it's really good at what it does. I guess it's just not perverted enough for me. I'll continue to keep tabs on this site. I'm sure they will have to change things up eventually.
Uh-oh, what happened at FTV? My account ran out 3 months ago, I had just setup to get their year-long special and in my head at least, I was convinced if they're still shooting like they always did that I was seriously considering making them my first 100. I used to talk to their webmaster but haven't heard from in awhile.
The good part with the psychologist dating, I met her, as a mentor to her. She was 18 when I first met her, I was 23-24. I typically have to find something odd to have in common with women since so few understand my past and at least in America, some are intimidated or timid about my past (prior to psychology, growing up around gangs in Los Angeles, lots of deaths including brother and more than 20 friends.) If I get the chance this weekend, I'll post a thread about fetishes. Khan used to always ask me to do those Q&A with a member and/or to open up more about myself. I used to talk to him a lot in emails and he always believed members would open up more if one of the longtime members started it. Now, I'm at the point in my life that I don't worry too much about who might see it or might realize who I am.
Hey RA, I responded once but the post monster ate it, so if a double reply shows up, you'll know why.
The anal masturbation on here is different than what I'm used to. A couple of the models go all out with a dildo, anally. Including one that puts a knee on each arm of the chair with her butt facing the camera. The best, to me, of the scenes with anal is one of Caprice's. She has four scenes on here, 3 include some kind of anal. The best one, she slowly fingers her butt with one finger, great eye contact in it, I'm not used to seeing what I would call "erotic anal fingering" but she pulls it off. Overall, about 20% of the scenes have anal in them. Abella Danger has a scene on here and as expected she goes all out with the dildo, anally. Probably half of the "anal" scenes are models masturbating with a butt plug in. I think the other two of Caprice are butt plug scenes. The most "extreme" they go is a couple of those real squirt scenes. By real squirt, I mean the model gets very wet and creamy and a little of it squirts out maybe 6 inches.
I didn't think too much about the price, my fetishes are driving my site joins these days. I was dating a female psychologist who I've known for 20 years. She says my fetishes are the oddest she's ever seen because "They're so normal". We have a lot of talks about how we develop our fetishes and she thinks it's funny that my fetishes are what she calls, "kind of cute, kind of sweet, kind of perverted". The public nudity one for example, my second wife was a natural exhibitionist. She was from South America. I couldn't keep her clothes on her. It did nothing for me. If anything, it made me frustrated. The "natural" part is what matters. She believed when at our house, in our backyard (fenced), in the small pool, she should be naked. Didn't matter if company came by. She would walk by them naked and get a towel to put around her. But she never was into "risky" which is where my public nudity fetish starts. I think a fetish thread would be good in the forum. I'm sure we have had some but at least with me, it would explain my choices in current sites.
Thanks tangub, my fetishes have been influencing the sites I join. Panties was never a top fetish of mine but I do have the one of women sliding their panties over to masturbate and this site does that a lot. The panty content is a lot like the older Euro sites and I think the ages of the models (little older than regular teen porn) has them being more erotic with the way they tease. I originally thought it might be the same company that runs Fitness Rooms and thought maybe one day they would combine them but they don't seem to be related. After going through the content, I'll surprise myself by saying I think Caprice's scenes are the best I've seen of her and the best on the site. I stopped collecting her content several years ago because everything I watched of her was the same. She's matured a lot, is over being "cute" and she really does a good job at being erotic (eye contact, body language). For the best value, I would wait about 6 months, they'll be up to over 100 scenes by then.
Their anal masturbation isn't that common, about 20% of the scenes and several are just the model masturbating with a butt plug in. I thought one of the Caprice scenes was one of the best. It included her doing a very light, one finger, anal masturbation towards the end of it. It is quite erotic. I think I kind of turned away from her content years ago because she was on every site I was on and thought her older content was kind of dull. She seems to have grown up a lot. I didn't even know she does anal content. And Abella Danger has a scene, I think she always does anal and does on here with a dildo. One of the scenes, I don't remember the model's name, maybe Lorena G the 31 year old model. She's up in the chair with a knee on each arm of the chair and using a dildo anally. The masturbation on the site is very good, overall. You get the feeling of real orgasms with most of the models and some are very intense (in speed), others are more erotic and move their bodies with the motion of the toy or fingers. There's nothing extreme on it, though. There was a couple of squirt videos that went more into the real or believable squirts where the creamy fluid squirts out maybe 6 inches.
I think a fetish thread would be interesting on the forum. I'm sure we've had them before to some extent but because my fetishes are very much influencing my site joins these days, it might be interesting to share some of mine and even how I developed them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The first site I've known of that covers the "dressing room" fetish.
- The quality is very high, maybe the highest I've seen as an overall site but there's a con about this too.
- Some well-known models like Lil' Caprice but there are a few models here that I've never heard of and you'll see the big con but these particular "new" models to me were worth joining for.
- You're going to get three main fetishes here: Dressing Room, panties and a combination of tease/explicit masturbation that is kind of rare these days.
- Very good download speeds, thanks to my cable company, hitting 80% of my new 400M internet connection.
- One day this will be part of a network and it will be worth joining that network for.
- CCBill is the biller and they tried a cross sale for Sex Art.
- If you like the models and the fetishes, I think it's a good price for this site.
- Updates twice a week
Cons:
- The site is small. As of today, 9/11/2018, they have 58 videos, 58 photo sets and 30 "extras" photo sets that look to be fairly genuine in being true self-shot photos.
- I would like to see them do more with the dressing room fetish. At times it feels like I could be watching a common solo video of a model without even noticing the setting.
- The lost fetish, bottom line will explain.
Bottom Line:
I don't know if it's an age thing or if maybe it's more of a more recent trend (thanks, smartphones) but I have this strange, unusual fetish of women undressing in dressing rooms and doing more to themselves while in there. I say strange even though I think it's much more common these days. I have dated a few women recently who liked sending pictures from the dressing room. You know the way that goes, "Do you like this outfit? Is this cute on me? Am I too old to be wearing this?" Then 376 pictures later, "How about this?" And the clothes magically disappeared.
Maybe that's the appeal of this site to me, the tease lasts about half of the video (20-25 minutes long scenes). You know you're getting old when a woman is sending you pictures and you're replying, "I'm getting hungry! And no, not in a sexual way!"
This site is in one way, very basic. The navigation is very simple and works as it should. The technical quality is the best I've seen when it comes to 100% of the content having these specs:
The videos are downloadable in 3 sizes, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I still don't have a 4K monitor so I can't say how crisp or clear those are but the 720p are very crisp and clear to me.
The pictures are downloadable and start with the model dressed, some of the outfits are very pretty, almost like it's what the model chose to wear or like they have a wardrobe specialist. The pictures are nearly 6000 long end.
The site is almost painfully exclusive feeling. What I mean by that, it's like they have very serious standards for their models. They have 58 scenes (videos and photos) but only 20 models. Which is good if you're like me and found a few you hadn't seen before, most have multiple shoots and outfits. At this point, it looks like this site should be rated very high unless removing points for the small size of it.
But ... why make a niche site that is untouched for the most part and make production mistakes that all but ruin the niche? First video I watched, the model teases, she's stripping, good site for those into panties, she starts masturbating and starts moaning loudly and groaning and squealing. A woman wouldn't masturbate in a store dressing room and moan and groan loudly! It's like writing a classic novel only to forget to proofread it.
That moaning is annoying enough but the scenes are dead silent. This isn't really a dressing room, is it? It's a box on the set? Where's the soft background music we would hear in stores? What about people randomly talking? This niche has a ton of potential but hearing a model's heels echo in a hollow room isn't part of the potential. That's sad to me.
I once watched an amateur that recorded herself masturbating in a dressing room. She was nearly biting her lip off to stop from moaning but someone bumped the door or went in the dressing room beside her and it aroused her, so a small moan slipped out. There's the potential. Something that makes this content look like it's a horny woman but not porn. Maybe I'm asking too much but anything to make scenes more than just basic masturbation scenes that are shot in the same room. I love to use my imagination when viewing porn but these production errors do make it almost too hard to imagine.
What saves them, besides the technical quality, are the models. I downloaded the content of 17 of the 20 models. Even found one model I'm not familiar with that I am going to have to look for, Apolonia Lapiedra, anyone that knows of more content of her let me know. She's engagement ring level.
I will also give them credit for not fudging the model's ages. Not that I know their ages but as mentioned, Lil' Caprice is here and instead of like most sites, she's not listed as 19, she's listed as 29. The youngest model on the site is 22, the oldest is 31. There is anal, vaginal masturbation but no sex, not even girl-girl. It's a girl and her toy in a box. Jill-in-the-box? Joking aside, I like this site for a one month join. They are updating twice a week but given that the videos are not that long, you will download most everything you want in a week (max). It's a very good, solo, panties, tease, masturbation site but every scene is in the box so I can't get the dressing room part out of my head.
I would recommend it for those who stand outside a dressing room and see a pretty woman walk in and start ignoring their wife asking them to get her a bigger size. If you're into "she would be that loud in public" (not your wife) then you'll love the content. I think panty fetishists also would enjoy this site. The scenes have roughly 10 minutes of tease at the beginning (formulaic?). For me the models made the site above average but that's really as far as I can go. Check the models out before joining and decide from there. Last, I did a similar of review of Fitness Rooms, with similar "problems" of the content just not being believable enough but it doesn't look like the sites are related.
I will have to check that out, I hadn't noticed her before joining this site that had her solo site on it. She isn't the type I usually go for, but she has something extra, that I can't explain. Thanks for the tip.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models feature some of the best known in the business, Sunny Leone, for example, to those unknowns that you wish you knew of!
- Has bonus access to 2 sites Cherry Petite and Squirt 4 Real
- Price is okay for one month join, would prefer to see $19.95 though
- Videos are 720 high end, bitrates need to improve only 1000
- Covers the different styles of porn from the very softcore to very hardcore on Squirt 4 Real
- DL speeds about average.
Cons:
- No zips, I should list that 3 times, maybe the zips would then appear like Candyman?
- Video bitrate of 1000 really is slow when running at 720 resolution.
- The only word I can think of is that the site is somewhat boring. I didn't go back for nearly 2 weeks after my first day of joining.
- Navigation can be annoying, open pictures in new window, close site on accident type annoying.
- The best looking models are either topless at best or not nude at all in underwear.
Bottom Line:
I couldn't help but laugh when on this site. The site looks very professional, but I thought to myself, "That professional look is to tease me so that I will accept the no zips" then when looking at the models, the most beautiful ones were pretty much tease shoots, so I guess they figured those would tease me enough that seeing the less attractive ones nude would be enough.
Quality on the videos is good, 720, but someone is going to have to explain to these sites that the higher the resolution, the higher the bitrate needs to be. 1000 is the bitrate and it seriously chugs along, maybe that is some sort of tease?
The videos on the main site Flashy Babes, could probably get away with a R rating. HBO After Dark type softcore. The videos on Squirt 4 Real are very X rated, not for sure if we still use XXX or not, but I would say XXX.
Besides the no zip problem, the pictures aren't very big, I found a few 1600 high end, but most are in the 1200 range. The videos are there in numbers with around 500, but a lot of them are just the photo shoot style videos.
Of course, on Squirt 4 Real, they only have around 30 videos.
The site that saves this package of sites is Cherry Petite. If you like to see young, very amateur models, this girl is for you. She has a few tattoos that she probably wishes she didn't have. She isn't a glam model at all. Doesn't have any plastic surgery and wears very little make-up. But she is seriously cute, and she does do full masturbation in the videos. She kind of reminds of me of a new Brooke Skye.
I wish they had more content just of her. With photo sets around 70 and the same for videos, her site alone was worth the price for me. Also, the Cherry Petite videos are 720 high end with 2000 bitrates. And those are worth downloading, all of them.
As a package, it is easy to recommend it. You get a full on tease site with Flash Babes, a full on hardcore site with Squirt 4 Real and you get a solo site of a very innocent looking woman that likes to masturbate in front of the camera. Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the kinkiest porn I have ever watched
- Lots of fetishes from feet to bondage to machine manipulation.
- Pretty models for this type of porn. I don’t recognize them.
- Is another of the mini-networks from Porn Doe. Has 3 sites included with it.
- Segpay is the biller and they’ve helped me out of 3 problems in recent months.
- The look on my face while watching these scenes. Not to mention the newfound ways to use curse words.
- Good but small network to give you something different than what you’re used to.
Cons:
- It’s just very small with only 63 scenes across the 3 sites.
- This would be a really nice addition to any of the other Porn Doe mini-networks.
- Jokes on them, they have a 100 download limit on this network but it only has 63 scenes.
Bottom Line:
It takes a lot to get me to review a 63 scene network. If you haven’t read my other reviews about Porn Doe breaking their sites up into mini-networks that’s what this is. For Bondage consists of 3 sites, they are: Crowd Bondage with 25 scenes, Badtime Stories with 30 scenes and Special Feet Force with 8 scenes. None of these sites have updated since around the time Coronavirus arrived. It’s a mini-network like this one that makes their $50 all network pass a better deal. To join For Bondage is $15 by itself. Which isn’t a bad price. I think if you’re into weird and fetish content you would probably download all 63 scenes.
Crowd Bondage is very reminiscent of Kink’s Public Disgrace. They take a woman, tie her up and a group of men and even women take turns having sex with her while a group stands around and watches. Some of these are outdoors. Public Disgrace is one of my favorite sites so I do like this site too. I don’t think this site is as big on the disgrace part as Public Disgrace is. It’s a good site overall, but it is a small site too with only 25 scenes.
Badtime Stories reminds me of if you took the dark Joker from Batman and turned him loose to shoot porn. It’s common for the participants to have on face paint, costumes, strange haircuts and hair colors. There is fisting, there are scenes with the woman in a pillory with a gag in her mouth. Some of this could be disturbing to viewers. One scene has a metal clip clipped to the woman’s bottom lip, a chain goes from it to her clitoris. So, if she lifts her head it stretches her clitoris. It looks like stuff you would see in the movie Saw.
The smallest site on this network, Special Feet Force, might be the best. This also makes me think of the dark Joker from Batman. There are women tied up, tickled until they pee on themselves, sometimes still in their clothes but what makes this one different is there’s almost always a third person. The scenes start out with the “torturer” and the “victim”. The third person is supposed to be like a brainwashed sex slave. The mistress or dominatrix commands the sex slave what to do to the tied up victim. It can be licking her dirty feet. It can be having sex with her while she’s tied up. They’re onto something with this small mini-network and this site probably shows it best. It only has 8 scenes as of right now.
I’m trying to cover the main mini-networks Porn Doe has created. I’m mainly doing it because I felt like the $50 all-network pass was a pretty good deal. I think the best way to look at it is if you like two of the mini-networks, those would cost $15 each and a mini-network like this For Bondage one could be the one to push you towards getting the all-network pass. I personally liked three of the mini-networks, Mamacitaz, Amateur Euro and VIP Sex Vault, joining each of those separately would cost $45. Which makes this For Bondage only $5. I also believe more people would like the Lets Doe It mini-network than I did. It has a few other mini-networks with it too including a transsexual one, Doe Girls which reminds me kind of Wow Girls and Hot Babes Plus. It almost feels like they’re justified in charging $50 for all these mini-networks.
Here on For Bondage they show they are willing to push the limits. They are tying models up to old medieval devices with what looks like 200-300 pound strength chains, turning the crank which pulls the model’s arms or legs. I said this several times while watching scenes, “This is some crazy shit.” I felt like Lawrence Fishburne. The “acting” in the scenes is very good. For Bondage has subtitles as well even though I’m not for sure they’re that good at translating.
For Bondage has scenes you would want to check out if you joined the all-network pass just because I don’t think anyone is doing this type of porn. Even their Crowd Bondage site which is a direct ripoff of Kink’s Public Disgrace really is better than a lot of the Public Disgrace scenes. It’s a good thing in porn when the viewer is most upset that you’re not updating. I haven’t said that in a long time but when someone complains there’s not enough content it’s because they like the content and want to see more of it.
The video quality is the same as their other sites and mini-networks. No 4K but they do have 1080p and 720p plus mobile versions. They have the 100 download limit PER network so that doesn’t carry over. A month of the all-network pass gives you around 1,000 downloads total. Fun mini-network all-around that just needs to get back into producing new updates or combine it with one of the other mini-networks.
My understanding always was that it is fake. Sort of a humor type joke from them. If you have seen the Eva Angelina clip on FoC, the guy completely covers her face, chest and the floor with "cum". She is cracking up the whole time. I think it is more of an assisted masturbation site with very big dildos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site that focuses on mainly young female models and something of a theme with “school” with schoolgirl outfits being common.
- The scene count has to be looked at from different angles. There are interview videos mixed in that are from the New Sensations DVDs. The count is 403 with no set update schedule but was updated 3 times this past month (February 2022).
- High quality video downloads and photosets.
- Models are all attractive and pros. The theme of young is captured well.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- The site looks good and works well. I’m not for sure that’s the best pro a site can have (see bottom line)
Cons:
- I knew the male talent would eventually wear on me and sure enough, it happened. I will have to explain that in the bottom line.
- This site is a good example of how you get into my skepticism. There are interview videos, posted as updates, from their DVDs which is a way to advertise their VOD site. See the bottom line.
Bottom Line:
This site is not bad, but it has made me reconsider my New Sensations network review score. This site’s only real connections to school are the outfits. Most of the scenes are in a house and on a couch or bed. There’s very little effort to make this a school fetish or anything more than a young female fetish site. You can’t really go wrong with that. It has been working for 70 years. I was expecting a little more story and playfulness from the models. Even silly acting. There could be some scenes that have that. I’m not going to watch all of them to verify it. I can see that most of these scenes are common porn. Guy with a young, cute or pretty female. In my early days of reviewing, I once said, a site is only as good as its models look. I still think that’s true. They do good on that part. The outfits look good. It just starts falling into the feeling of I’ve seen this before. I don’t know how much age plays into that being a problem.
When one of my biggest pros and compliments is the site looks good and works well, that’s probably not a good thing. I shouldn’t even be noticing those things. It’s like the gold-plated strip club. People said the strippers weren’t that good but where else could you sit at a gold table and watch women strip? I think you would eventually get over the gold table part. I mentioned bringing my skepticism. That’s not something I like to do. I do have a long history with this network. What I see is a site that has the right idea and the right setup. That is an old feeling I had years ago on New Sensations. I’m not going to call it bait and switch. They’re not doing anything terrible or in bad practice. They’re doing what they know works. This site shows it more than the others. I hadn’t seen this site before this membership. The oldest scene was posted in 2012. I believe my last membership here was 2010. As impressed with some of the movie previews, as I am, I open those to find out it’s an interview. That gives me flashbacks to renting porn DVDs with a beautiful model on the cover. You would get to the end of the DVD and the model on the cover wasn’t in any scenes. The interviews have some “value” but where’s there’s value there’s taking away from. You can see how cute and nice some of these models are. Others are just saying they are only in it for the sex and money.
The site is big enough, it probably should be bigger, considering it has been around nearly 10 years. The updates are not even close to following a schedule. In February 2022, there were 3 new scenes. In January 2022, there was 1. Before January 2022, there are months with 0 updates. If they can keep up 2-4 scenes per month that’s acceptable. It has around 405 scenes counting interviews. I used “around” mainly because the last oldest scenes are really the two newest scenes. I don’t know how that happens. They do offer 4K on the newer videos. The pictures are a highlight. It’s just because they know to include 15-20 of the model by herself before switching to screencaps. You can download those in a zip.
The male talent gets too much camera time. If it was a site about the couple being sexy. I could understand it. It’s a site about Fresh Outta High School. The use of the male is questionable to begin with. This was the problem I had with New Sensations in the past. I don’t remember which old Porn User said it, “We’re not paying to see Igor talk or look at him”. That’s the feeling. If you have to include a man in a schoolgirl site, keep him out of view as much as possible. This is probably the toughest con. They’re made me wonder how good their DVDs are. Good for their marketing team but it’s based on a lot of these scenes on the site are filler scenes on DVDs. Every porn DVD ever released had filler scenes. That’s what you’re getting on this site. You’re going to have to join their VOD site and pay $6-$20 to buy or rent one DVD. That’s how you enter my skepticism. You’ve showed me you are making higher grade porn and the price shows it. You can get this whole network for $10-$20. I got it for $10 back around the holidays. I can see that you can’t even buy one of their VOD DVDs for $20. It has 4-6 scenes on it.
It could be better overall, and I think for someone newer to porn it’s a good value. There are plenty of pretty models on this site and you get the network access included. The problem is going to be, I may not be back for another 12 years. I think an 80 is fair. It has everything it needs (quality, pretty models). Nothing extra, no bells and whistles. It will get you by. The best way to wrap this up is these are the same type scenes you would see on Videobox. I’m not going to drop the network’s score. I know that other people haven’t been a member of New Sensations going on 15 years. I used to join this network 2-3 times a year.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
*I am re-reviewing sites I have scored 100, in the past, to see if those perfect scores still hold true*
- Even if not a 100, FTV has been a consistent top or near top scoring site for me for 16 years now.
- The video download quality and photo download quality is some of the best you will see.
- The models, while by definition, first timers, are mostly amateur though a few established porn stars have appeared on FTV.
- Similar to Zishy on this one, I generally love the clothing choices the models wear for their videos and pictures.
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- Navigation and tags are great once you understand them
- Usually can also join FTV Milfs with a promo when signing up.
Cons:
- The punishment of having a site over 20 years. The older photo sets and videos need remastering and some have been remastered.
- I’ll prepare for the boos on this one, I haven’t ever liked the girl/girl scenes or boy/girl scenes on FTV. Keep it solo!
Bottom Line:
FTV is one of the few sites that I truly believe can score 100 and not hear complaints about the 100. It was one of the first solo American-based sites to enter the online porn world. The models have never been complained about by anyone. These models are usually amateur and they dress or are dressed in a way that normal, young women dress. That means you get a lot of teasing, especially in the pictures. With the addition of FTV Milfs and the ability to sign-up for both, you really could just join the two FTV sites and never pay attention to any other porn site. Or at least I could.
The choice of clothing seems like an ironic pro for porn but there’s one key word to describe the clothing, feminine. I’ve never shied away from my deep interest in women that are strong on the femininity. The FTV ladies do femininity better than any site I know of and they do so without being glam.
The videos on FTV show you a whole other side too. I once said the FTV setup of pictures and videos, is art-like. The videos retain the femininity of the photos but the ladies are more often naked and often being very kinky in the videos. You will see toy appearances from the FTV Toy, a large dildo that all the ladies used to try. That toy was more popular than any male pornstar.
There is the part that’s easy to forget about. The public nudity and flashing. The newer scenes still have some public nudity and flashing but it’s not near as noticeable as some of the older content, which is understandable. Our society has become more prudent and it’s now considered a terrible thing for a young lady to flash her boobs or even masturbate in public.
The navigation on FTV is one of my favorite parts but have known quite a few people who didn’t like it. You go through pages of models. You can filter them down to ages to hair color, however you want. You have to remember there are models from over 20 years. It’s a huge list. That’s why the tags are helpful. The tags will lead you to “most” of what you’re looking for. I say “most” because some of the newer scenes don’t seem to have as much care put into if the tags are all there.
One of the longtime cons for fans was the splitting of videos. When I scored FTV a 100, I listed the splitting of videos as not bothering me any longer and it still doesn’t. I guess I have watched the videos enough times that I realized the splitting is often for effect. I know when we hear of porn scenes being split, we think about a scene showing a woman getting into her masturbation, then the video stopping and leaving us to wait on our computer to download part 2 but that’s not how the FTV scenes are split. The masturbation part will be a full scene before cutting. After the cut, it may be the woman masturbating again but the type of toy, her outfit, the setting, will be different. I just don’t see it being a negative in the same vein as cutting scenes halfway through.
The list of pros is far more important to me. You will have a difficult time finding a site with this many attractive and maybe more importantly, kinky models. FTV shows the true strength of solo porn. The model is on her own. I will even mention Danielle (Blonde curly hair), one of the hottest models anyone has ever seen on a pornsite. But, even after trying multiple takes and even bringing her back to the site, she just struggled with giving a performance that matched her incredible looks. There are other models that might not jump out at you with their looks but then put on a near-perfect masturbation show and you see the similarity between real-life and porn. It’s not always just about looks. It may be about something different for every person that watches the scenes. And that is FTV’s strength. The scenes are authentic and even in the most kinky ones, it’s attractive and not just in a lustful way.
At least for me, I have found I look at the models differently when I see them on FTV. You see the real person not an actress. That is the selling point. These models whether a 10 or a 6, are going to either win fans over with their performance or fail no matter how hot they are.
I am going to score it similar to how I have in the past. A 96 and the 4 points deduction is for the lesser amount of public nudity and teasing.
It seems like as long as I've been at PU, we've had the scoring system explained as 90-100 is "best of class". It's something I used to talk to Khan about. Once the word "best" is used, which means "one" to me. It feels like the 100 is the right score to signify that to me this is the site that is the best of its class. No site could ever be perfect, so the though that a 100 is a perfect site, makes even having the 100 score, illogical. If it's not possible, why have it? That's how I ended up with two 100s. FTV, to me, is a solo, masturbation, glamorous but amateur site. It's the only one if that group or class that's even close to a 100. Zishy, follows a similar path as FTV. I love the Only All sites for their tease content but nearly every model is a pro and everything is professionally shot while Zishy is mostly amateurs and they shoot everywhere. There a newer set at Target. It makes Zishy stand out in their class,to me. And the price of Zishy, something we used to weren't supposed to consider in reviews, which I thought took the "user" experience out since we pay for the sites unlike paid reviewers that get free review passes.
If I had to pick between FTV and Zishy it would be FTV. Tease is often enough for me but not always. And while I like pictures as much as videos that's the important part to notice. I like them as much as, not more than. Zishy's videos are okay while FTV's videos are very good.
My feelings on FTV MILFs, I lowered the score on it the last time I reviewed it. It depends on the model. They are really going broad in the age range. I believe they have one was 19 on Milfs and one who is 56 or 57. It makes Milfs a little more inconsistent to me. If you don't like two of the new models, that's half of a month's new updates.
I would put FTV Girls at the top of all sites for my tastes. I recommend joining FTV Girls, they will offer you a week of Milfs for $8 and it's full access, CCBill is the biller so you can easily cancel the week membership before it rebills.
Thanks Witty, good to see you around. I'm now dealing with the obsessive-compulsiveness of wanting to get to 510 so the 5 can divide evenly into the 10. Some things never change.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It’s that time of the year to review FTV. A site I first reviewed in 2007.
- I try to make these reviews a little different from my previous one of the same site. I don’t know if the high production values makes members think this is not an amateur site, but it is with a few exceptions.
- A steady update schedule of 4-5 updates per month. I believe they snuck some remasters in there too as bonus updates.
- I’ve been a member on this site for so long I think I have my own tag, that’s how well their tags work once you figure them out.
- I really don’t need to talk about the quality of the photographs or videos, do I? I will in the bottom line.
- It’s a strange pro but important one. The site does what it says it’s going to do. You get what you paid for.
- Being my 500th review it’s going to contradict this one, I would just be happy with a membership to this site and no others.
Cons:
- It looks like to me they’ve decided to lay off using the public nudity tag even on the scenes that show public nudity in the preview picture. I’m sure there’s a reason behind it but I relied heavily on that tag.
- Those split videos are now one of my favorite parts but other people will see them as cons.
Bottom Line:
This is review #500. If you had told me in 2007 that I would be writing my 500th review in 2021 and it would be of FTV Girls, I would have said, “What took me so long and FTV is still around?” As much as I talked about the 3 straight years of Zishy membership, it’s not quite as impressive or concerning as my 8 straight years of at least 9 months (per year) of FTV memberships. I first reviewed FTV in 2007, my first year on PU and the first year of PU.
I have explained this in previous reviews of FTV and will again. It’s something I see as a negative for some. The videos being in parts. It took me about 10 years to figure out the point of it. It is to make it where you can download only the parts you want. Because FTV does touch on different fetishes, there are some parts of the “full” video, some people don’t want or in my case, I sometimes only want the exhibitionism part of the video. Considering the FTV new scenes are in 4K, I believe it’s even more of a positive. One of the newer scenes is a total of 23GB for the video parts. I would not be happy about downloading 23GB to watch 6 minutes of exhibitionism at the first of the video. Even if I downloaded the 1080p, it would be around 10GB total and I wouldn’t be happy about storing a 10GB file or waiting on it to download just to watch 6 minutes of it. I figured this out when I couldn’t come up with a negative reason for FTV splitting the videos. Some sites (I won’t name them), split videos up so they can release one today, the other tomorrow, to make it look like they’re updating more and to boost their video count. FTV doesn’t do that. They release all the parts at the same time. It’s a feature built for improving the member’s experience with their content. Maybe I can see why it wouldn’t hurt to have a full scene download option but can tell you, I wouldn’t be using it.
I’m surprised they aren’t using their public nudity tag as much. You can look at the preview right now and see that at least half of the last 30 updates show public nudity but none of those have the public nudity tag. If that keeps bringing in more public nudity then I won’t mind or complain at all.
The models are the most important part to FTV. So many people do not realize this is an amateur site. I know there are a few exceptions but as an example, of the last 30 new models, 29 were shooting their 1st ever porn scene. I’ve said it before, every porn star started somewhere. It’s not FTV’s fault if the model goes on to film 468 gangbang scenes and that’s a major selling point of FTV for me. You get to see these models that you may never see again or that you may see fighting 16 dicks in a gangbang. I don’t believe a lot of these models go on to careers in porn. I see them more as curious, playful, often silly and flirty young women who just want to make some money and do something they may not ever get the chance to do again.
The quality is exactly what I expect from FTV. The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p and one smaller one. Since I only download the parts of the video I want, I do download the 1080p. I usually only download 720p on other sites. The older scenes do have a drop off in resolution but outside of their earliest years, FTV has almost always had very high quality. Their pictures can be downloaded and the high resolution zip files are 5200 long end. One of my biggest compliments for FTV is the colors in their photos and videos. Their pictures and videos are life-look looking, natural lighting, instead of the lighting we see a lot of studios use that make the models look like they’re glowing in the dark.
Something has been fixed that I felt was a bigger con than the split videos. The filenaming system has been updated. For years, maybe even a decade, the scenes were all numbered 01, 02, 03 and so on. Which meant you had a bunch of 01 scenes like this 01, 01 (1), 01 (2) and no way to know who was in the video without opening it. Here is a filename of a video I just downloaded earlier “sinclair-(scene number) - 01”. That’s a major deal if you’re an organizational weirdo like me. I even looked back and downloaded a few old scenes, all scenes have the new filenaming system. That’s how you make a 99 site a 100. The site has proven time and time again to be the site I return to and my bank statement would tell you the same thing. I can’t think of anything I would change on FTV. Some of the models this year are easily in the top 10 FTV models of all-time and they were 1st timers. It’s the best site in porn, for my tastes and after 500 reviews, I have no reason to believe there’s one I’ve missed. They also use CCBill as their billing processor, not that I cancel it very often. I usually try to join it 3 months at a time, then take a month off, then back to a 3 month, month off, and back to a 3 month. If all other porn sites were free, I would still pay for FTV Girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If I reviewed it based just on subjectivity, the score would be a 100.
- Going on 5 years of having a membership here at least 9 out of 12 months of each year.
- One of the simplest sites to use despite being a very large site.
- Solo, public nudity, public flashing, exhibitionism, extreme insertions, and many of the models are being recorded for the 1st time.
- Technical aspects of the site and content are close to the top of the industry.
- Update rate has increased though not entirely set in stone, pretty common to get a new update every 4-5 days instead of once per week and went through a few months of a new update every 3 days.
- Photo sets are some of the best in the industry.
- Highest video download options are 4K with 12000 bitrate.
- Probably the prettiest amateur models you'll find on any site.
- Downloads are fast (85% of max speed)
- Tag system is one of the best I've used.
- Sorting features for finding models is also useful (all will be explained in BL)
Cons:
- The 1 point I took off is because I know so many are against the split videos. I've been a member on it for so long that I've picked up on why the videos are split and now prefer it.
- Filenames are still 01, 02, 03. I just make a folder for each model and download them to that but if a model has more than one scene it's still possible to get them mixed up.
Bottom Line:
I had told several members that I thought FTV was going to get my first and only 100 rating but I took 1 objective point off for the split videos. I used to take 10 off for it.
I'll talk about that first. The scenes are split to change locations, to change outfits, to change whatever action the model is doing. For me, a lover of exhibitionism, there are models on here that I'm really not that interested in except for their exhibitionism parts. I'll call that the fetish is greater than the model rule. On those, being able to just download one 5-10 minute exhibitionism clip of the model is a lot better than downloading a 60 minute video that I'll only watch the first 5-10 minutes of.
I'm sure there are people that like the masturbation better and fast-forward the exhibitionism, they can just download the masturbation parts and don't have to download the full video.
I think that split video format reminds us too much of the old days when you would be watching a porn scene only to realize you hadn't downloaded the 2nd part and the 1st part stopped mid-sex. That's not what FTV is doing with the split scenes.
The tagging system is one of my favorite parts of FTV. Each scene has a row of icons on it. These icons tell you what happens in the scene, "1st time on camera", "public nudity" and it's the easiest to use tagging system. See above, I like the exhibitionism, I can find those scenes with one click.
You then have the models. FTV Girls is close to 1,500 models and to me they're all attractive, maybe not all are my types but all are attractive. You will see some pros and most of those filmed for FTV before they were pros, not all. I always thought one of the best examples was Eva Angelina who was very early in her porn career and while she isn't shy on FTV she's nothing like she became in hardcore porn.
There are many models on here that you'll wish had more content on other sites too. It's one of the few sites that makes you think, "How could she stop at these 4 photo sets and 100 minutes of video?"
The exhibitionism, while maybe toned down a little, is still very much a part of the site and the 18-19 years of archives. They have changed their public nudity tag to say, "Risky flashing and getting naked in public places". Which means even the scenes not tagged that way still often have some light flashing. That's the big selling point for me. I would join just for those parts.
When you search the potentially overwhelming model list you can filter by date of release, alphabetical, age, height and bra size. You, of course, can use the tags too. It's one of the most complete and easy to use (once you get the hang of it) navigation systems I've used.
The technical quality continues their excellence. The newer photo sets have a 5000 long end option that you can download. You can also download a smaller resolution as well. The current videos have 480p, 1080p and 4K with above average bitrates to match the resolutions. Even the 480p has a 3000+ bitrate.
They have something I think a lot of sites should add and that's a sneak peek section to show you the next couple of updates so you know what's coming up. It also shows the more frequent update schedule I mentioned earlier. They had a new set on 3/17/20, have another coming on 3/21/20 and another on 3/27/20. They're upped their game there. I was happy with one per week.
These updates are worth mentioning as well as they're not one video and one photo set. These updates come with 250-500 photos (spread across 4-5 sets/different outfits and locations) and 70-100 minutes of video. They could, if they wanted, release one photo set a day and one section of the video and I would guess say they have an update everyday.
They have a bonus section that has several hundred outtakes, public flashing, models masturbating in the car on the ride to the setting for the shoot and these are all FTV models so you can get some extra content of your favorite models. Some are photos, some are 3-5 minute videos and it's worth looking into these since I've found some very good videos that I don't know why they're not mixed in with the regular shoot.
The total amount of content is nearing 10,000 photo sets/videos and here's a few breakdowns by tags:
Nearly 1,000 of the models have some content listed as Public Nudity.
Nearly 900 of the models are listed as 1st time filmed.
Those two alone are enough for me to stick around as long as I have. The photo sets, besides the technical numbers, feature the models in normal, everyday clothes, especially if you've ever been to the west coast of the United States. When I started getting bored with glam models, I started joining FTV more (around 2013) and to me the models are very natural looking and acting for American models. There's also some ethnic diversity. I keep trying to find something to complain about but it's not working. I personally think it's the best all-around porn site on the internet.
On FTV, the newer scenes definitely are tamer in the public parts. You get some flashing but little else. They stopped using the "NU!" public nudity tag unless there is more risky/masturbation and only 1 of the last 12 releases has the NU! tag.
While not a true "search" where you type in a keyword or tag, if you click on "model directory", it will open the model list. The "tags" are listed above each model: Nu! (public nudity), 1st (first time in porn), etc...
They don't look clickable but they are. If you click any of the tags it will take you to all of the models that have that specific tag, in order from newest to oldest.
I've never looked at the samples but I've never noticed any fuzzy or grainy pictures in the members area. I've been a member 50 of the last 60 months and have always thought the pictures here are some of the best on the internet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site that has returned more to its amateur roots.
- In my opinion, the best site for those who like public flashing, touching, as these once favorites have now returned in nearly every new update.
- Models are starting to become more varied in appearance. There's been several busty-type models added recently (Darcie is a favorite). Also seeing more dark haired models, there was a time when it seemed like 90% of new models on here were blonde.
- Video and photo quality are both excellent, zips for downloading photo sets.
- Lots of sporty girls, flexible, working out, dancing.
- Site navigation has improved greatly.
Cons:
- The days of the more extreme FTV seem to be over. You rarely see the giant dildos or the FTV Toy, but it's not a con for me, could be for others.
- Webmaster or whoever programs the site goes a little overboard with the use of tags, really, it's not public nudity just because the model gets nude in a private backyard in Arizona.
- And the big one, the videos are still split into parts. I don't know how many times I've reviewed FTV or commented about it, but despite all the reasoning I've heard, "The different clips show the progression of the scene" was one, and another was, "Some people don't like masturbation, others don't like teasing, the clips allow users to pick just the ones they like". So does the fast-forward and rewind button.
Bottom Line:
FTV has always been an up and down site for me. Many times as a member, the up and down status happened from day to day. I admit, one of my favorite niches in porn is public nudity/flashing and even better if the model slips a little masturbation in too.
I like the combination of danger/excitement/arousal you see from the models in the public nudity scenes. And one really big plus for FTV is the models, at least to me, are becoming more and more amateur. I'm sure it's no different than it used to be where someone like Eva Angelina appeared here early in her career then went on to be one of the most prolific porn actresses of all-time.
FTV to me is the best public nudity site available that is still updating. So if public, exhibitionism is your thing, you should try it out just for those scenes.
The site's navigation has improved thanks to a new design in the member's area. New might not be the right word, but it was new to me when I joined 3 months ago. I had been away from this site since roughly 2010. It could still be improved by better tagging. All scenes now have tags across the top of their description. These are nicely done bold and bright tags that make it easy to see if a scene has something in it you might like. Some examples:
Nu! = Public Nudity, O = Real Orgasm, Ex = Extreme Scene and so on. These are very useful except for one thing. Since adding this tagging system they've went back and tagged every scene on their entire site. I will give them credit for not just throwing every tag possible on every scene, but there's the occasional misused tag that can be frustrating.
The frustration is made worse by the videos being cut into parts. Instead of just downloading one big file then scanning through it for the part you're most interested in, you have to download 4-10 parts then open each one and look for the part you're interested in.
If that's not enough frustration, the videos here are such high quality that it makes you wonder if they realize stopping to load another video is breaking up the continuity of the scenes? An example: Cayton Cayley (Candice) has a scene where she's flashing in a car repair garage. There's men all around and she's getting more aroused by each one that look at her. Then ... the video stops. Load the next one, watch the FTV logo for 2-5 seconds, video starts and she's walking to a room in the back where men are going to watch her masturbate. That's not only senseless, but it's illogical. One of the few believable things I've heard behind the reasoning of breaking the scene up is "Videos are shot in different locations". While I'm sure video editing software could piece those together still, I can at least see how one moment the model is nude in public, the next she's in a bed getting ready to masturbate, could also make the videos less natural-feeling, but the one I used above was in the same building. As are many others.
My guess is it will never change. It's been this way for over 10 years. Outside of that fairly big problem, the site delivers. The change from some extreme scenes to hardly no extreme scenes didn't bother me.
The size of the site can be overwhelming. I don't have near as much time to view/download porn as I used to so I've ended up staying at FTV for 3 straight months trying to rebuild my collection of their content. Updates are once a week and include videos and photos of one model. It's also still a great site for collectors since a lot of well-known porn stars including hardcore, extreme ones, were here on FTV early in their careers, showing some innocence and playfulness, you don't see from them in their newer work.
The interviews are often funny and show the model's personality away from being a model. I would even wonder how many models have helped/hurt themselves with these interviews?
I know there's been reviews and comments about the download speed being poor, but I haven't experienced any problems over the 3 months. My download speed on here is roughly 90% or higher of what it should be. Just tested it again before writing this review.
Overall, this is how I see this site: There's high-quality photos and videos. Decent download options on the videos and zips for the photos. The improved navigation (since 2010) makes the site much easier to use. Even the types of models have improved over the last year or so (subjective). But there's always that one but revolving around the split videos. I can say I took off 6-8 points for the split videos. It creates too much of a frustration situation. I can either download the clips I know I'll like and skip the others, which will make me wonder what I missed or I can just download them all, which is what I end up doing.
Even with the frustration, it's the best at public nudity and at finding very attractive amateur models.
I do think the site is more worthwhile than the vast majority of sites these days, but what you were seeing was the webmaster catering to his own fetishes. This is where the repetition comes in. He's not near as bad now about it though. I had never seen a promo from them until that one on another site. There are a lot of ifs with the site. If the navigation was better, it would probably be easier to find the sets that would interest us, but we're in a long, losing battle with stubborn webmasters on that part.
I'm not for sure on that one. But it's the point I was making. If he's going to just have one update per week, what does it hurt him to post the high superpics of every set instead of the 1600 high end ones? Would it really hurt his profits to offer past members a slightly lower price knowing he only updates once per week and there wouldn't be much new for them to download? As it is, I'm bumping it back to joining maybe once every two years. I do know the webmaster can be a jerk. If you haven't seen that look up how he talked about Eufrat and complained about her "poor English" knowing good and well when he hired her she wasn't a native English speaker. He went as far as leasing that set to other sites and went on a rant about how he would never hire another Euro model, seems like he called them "fake, plastic, robotic". His comments on Danni Yeager's sets were also bad. He blames the models when the sets don't go how he thinks they should go.
A big part of my overall liking of a model comes from either pure confidence in herself or pure innocence. These newer models seem to have neither. I think they may be trying to cut back on costs by hiring the truest amateur models, right off of college campuses. Most of the girls are cute at least, but their personalities are poor once on camera. They set such a high standard in those earlier years and I do think that is the biggest problem they have now. If they were a new site, say just for the last 2 years, I would probably be talking about how daring and risky their sets are. Compared to their past work though, it seems like they are just going through the motions.
I do think they are doing quite a bit of public stuff still. It maybe isn't as blatant, like the Paola Rey ones were, but it seems like nearly every model now has at least one outdoors/public video. They are going with a lot of more athletic ones with the athletic girls exercising in parks, flash here, flash there, some will just take their clothes off and keep exercising. Those really appealed to me, but a lot of times the model herself didn't. In your case, I would still recommend it. Seems like I remember you saying you didn't have Cayton Caley's "garage" set, if I lost that, I would rejoin just to get that one set. If you do, she is listed as Candice.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
