Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : exotics4me (0)  

Feedback:   All (1893)  |   Reviews (431)  |   Comments (216)  |   Replies (1246)

Other:   Replies Received (1389)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 451-475 of 2066 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
451
Visit Elegant Raw

Elegant Raw
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - One of those sites that slipped under my radar. Hardcore content mostly and features some of the greatest models ever.
- 143 models and some of the names will surprise some of those that have been around porn for 10+ years. Will go into in bottom line.
- Over 500 scenes, but there are non-downloadable bonus scenes mixed in, will try to get a more accurate number in bottom line.
- All scenes have the same video options of 540p, 720p and 1080p.
- Over 200 photo sets, the navigation is making it hard to count them. The photos are downloadable and are 4000 long end.
- Updates 3 photo sets and 3 videos per month.
- Navigation is good except for a few small glitches.
Cons: - Way too many bonus scenes mixed into the regular updates. The numbers in bottom line will show it. Those are full scenes and can be streamed fully but it's frustrating when you see one you like and realize you can't download it.
- It's either a site that has some old videos they've released as newer or some of the top models of the 2006-2011 have came out of retirement.
- Promoted public scenes in the preview. I haven't seen one public scene and the search box shows none.
Bottom Line: This site belongs to producer Nathan Blake and he promotes it as high quality, tasteful HD porn. That's usually a bad sign!

I'm going to start with what was the easy selling point for me. The models. The Euro star that I once said had the most beautiful eyes in porn, Aleska Diamond. I haven't seen a scene with her in awhile. She has 8 videos and 6 picture sets, also noticed she now has implants and has cut her hair shorter.

Cameron Cruise, a hidden gem of a model that Viv Thomas made into a big star for about 1 year back in maybe 2009. She just has 1 video here but I thought she retired long ago.

Sandra Shine, one of the original members of the Euro group called "The no take dick six". She has 4 photo sets and 2 videos. Both are listed as 2016. Everything I've ever found about her was she retired in 2011-2012.

The one that I didn't think had retired but hadn't seen much content of lately, Simony Diamond,arguably one of my top 3-4 actresses from the Euro porn boom of 2006-2011. She has 10 photo sets and 9 videos here. Much like Aleska, but likely for different reasons, Simony now has implants. Her scenes are the best on this site including the "typical" Simony of taking on 2-3 guys at a time.

The most pleasant surprise was seeing Yoah Galvez, an underused model, she has 5 photo sets and 4 videos.

There are others as well like Laura Lion, Aletta Ocean, Angel Rivas, Christina Bella and maybe 20 more that were once major stars but fell off when the American Network sites took control of the porn world.

The quality on videos is very good unless you're wanting 4K. The photos at 4000 long end with downloadable zips are again well above industry standards.

Which leads to what I'll call the bad part. There's a lot of porn fans today that won't have any idea who these models are. For the fans from Euro Boom era they'll know nearly all of the models.

The problem with the bonus scenes:
The videos are lined in rows of 4 horizontal and 10 vertical. Half are bonus scenes. That's 2 per horizontal row of 4. These are not tricky bonus scenes trying to get you to click on them to lead you into joining another site. They are full streaming scenes. There is an advertisement below them but it's not trying to trick you.

Still, half the scenes are not downloadable. If you notice the photo sets have over 200 and the videos are just over 500, you could cut that video number in half and see that there's really just 200+ downloadable videos here.

This is one of the toughest calls when it comes to recommending it. For me, the Aleska Diamond, Simony Diamond and Yoah Galvez scenes were worth a membership. Sandra Shine's scenes are somewhat flat which is consistent with how her career went as she seemed to lose interest after getting married. The Cameron Cruise scene is very good and somewhat rare. Cameron's best known scenes were lesbian scenes with Eve Angel and Sophie Moone. This one on Elegant Raw is a male/female scene. I don't think I had ever seen her do a male/female scene before it.

I think that is the recommendation. If you're familiar with these models and liked their work in the past here's a chance to see how they're doing now. If you're not familiar with these models there's probably not a lot here that you'll like as it will look like normal porn. They do have a mix of male/female, group, solo and lesbian scenes, very similar to how the old Euro sites were. I'm not going real high on the score since outside of those I listed, I didn't have much interest in the other content.

Good site overall that would be better if they had a filter to remove all those bonus scenes.

04-08-20  02:08am

Replies (0)
Review
452
Visit Bratty Sis

Bratty Sis
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some more taboo stepfamily porn.
- 147 scenes, videos, photos and screencaps.
- CCbill
- 121 models, some scenes have multiple models in them.
- Ran by the Nubiles group, but is not part of their network.
- High quality on everything.
Cons: - Scenes are not as likable as similar niche/stepfamily sites.
- Some scenes are under 30 minutes. In this niche, as unbelievable as it usually is, the build up and story mean everything
- Indistinguishable niche/poor acting.
Bottom Line: I'll admit a mistake on my part. I thought this was a Team Skeet standalone site. I realized when I saw my bank statement said XFC that's it's a Nubiles owned standalone site. I like Nubiles but it kind of lowered my expectations on them pulling off what is supposed to be a taboo niche.

I went big word in my cons. Indistinguishable niche, some of these scenes do nothing to make you even think these are stepsiblings. It's not that I want it to be completely believable, it's just it's like plain old hardcore, gonzo scenes.

My score isn't bad on it. I know that some might not mind that problem/con.

The models are cute and at times way too serious to fit this niche. It's like stepfamily falling in love porn. I'm being too hard on it. It's good, especially if you like the models. I will say the scenes with more than two people in them are very good. It breaks up that feeling of mushy/heartcore and those are also the more entertaining. It will be a stepsister that bets her best friend something with the loser having to have sex with the stepsister's stepbrother. It's at least something.

I didn't have any step-siblings so I don't know if step-siblings just jump up and start having sex or if they kind of fall into because of some game they were playing ... which is what I prefer to believe.

The video quality goes up to 1080p and goes down to 270p, I'm still downloading the 720p myself and they look very good. Photos are a strength here as the Nubiles group used to be more focused on photos than videos. You can tell, very high quality, professional studio style photos.

I'm just starting to think this niche is getting stale. They're probably going to need to watch some Japanese stepfamily porn to improve the niche. Either that or do like Team Skeet does and go just silly and completely unbelievable with it (Family Strokes).

The site at least has a good update schedule but I would take 1/2 the scenes if they put more work into each of the scenes. I don't even know that it's that this niche is that popular or if it's that porn finally found a story or angle that gets into the taboo section of our brains. It's worth a join, especially if you like the models but there are better stepfamily sites out there.

02-24-20  11:34pm

Replies (2)
Review
453
Visit Teen Curves

Teen Curves
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very underrated site in a very underappreciated niche.
- Only 107 scenes but is updating with 1-2 scenes per months, might be pushed aside for their site Thickumz.
- Could be that I'm just not familiar with a lot of the newer models but there are many models here I haven't seen before and hope to see more of.
- Five download options of videos from 360p to 1080p, good bitrates on those but the filesizes are large, some as big as 3GB.
- Nice use of baby oil to make those curves sparkle and shine.
- Photo sets with downloadable zips. Some of these are better than the videos.
Cons: - Needs more updates, this is the type of site I would stay a member of if they upped the updates to 2-3 times a week.
- Could use more story, the scenes give you a little story of less than 3 minutes then the action starts. Feels like the scenes are being timed.
Bottom Line: Years ago, I would search TGP sites for "curvy teens" back then curvy wasn't a commonly used word so it would instead show "chubby teens".

This site gets the curvy teens part right. They are younger models with bigger hips, bigger butts, fuller boobs and there's even a touch of chunkiness to some of them.

I know this network also has the site Thickumz, which looks very similar to Teen Curves. Thickumz has to be bought separately.

For the time being though, you can get these 107 scenes of very attractive curvy teen models with a Team Skeet membership. The content itself is okay, you know that when some of the photo sets are better than the videos.

Some of my favorite models here that I would like to see more content of are:
Kosame Dash, Katrina Kastro, Violet Myers, especially Cassidy Banks and Demi Rogue. There are more but the main point to take from that is I'm downloading the vast majority of these scenes.

Some of these models do not look like teens. This is one niche that I do believe the "teen" part is important.

The videos are very clear even on the 720p option and the photo sets are as good as you will find on a network. They also have screencaps for download, so you get quite a bit of content out of 107 scenes.

I would like to see the curvy teens stay dressed a little longer than do in these scenes. In Cassidey Banks scene she gives an upskirt pussy view within the first minute and is mostly nude by the 3 minute mark of a 32 minute scene. Yes, I watch porn to see women in clothes and in sexually provocative poses that don't show everything!

I have never had download speed problems with Team Skeet, I know others have but I downloaded all 107 scenes from this site using free download manager in about 2 hours. These videos will stay in my collection as it's still hard to find real teen curvy models.

It makes me want to join their Thickumz site just to see if they are doing similar content there. They do seem to put more production values in their standalone sites and it might be worth giving it a try.

It's a site that would be easy to look over if you're a member of Team Skeet but if you like curvy teens you should check it out.

10-12-19  01:20am

Replies (1)
Review
454
Visit Fitting Room

Fitting Room
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The first site I've known of that covers the "dressing room" fetish.
- The quality is very high, maybe the highest I've seen as an overall site but there's a con about this too.
- Some well-known models like Lil' Caprice but there are a few models here that I've never heard of and you'll see the big con but these particular "new" models to me were worth joining for.
- You're going to get three main fetishes here: Dressing Room, panties and a combination of tease/explicit masturbation that is kind of rare these days.
- Very good download speeds, thanks to my cable company, hitting 80% of my new 400M internet connection.
- One day this will be part of a network and it will be worth joining that network for.
- CCBill is the biller and they tried a cross sale for Sex Art.
- If you like the models and the fetishes, I think it's a good price for this site.
- Updates twice a week
Cons: - The site is small. As of today, 9/11/2018, they have 58 videos, 58 photo sets and 30 "extras" photo sets that look to be fairly genuine in being true self-shot photos.
- I would like to see them do more with the dressing room fetish. At times it feels like I could be watching a common solo video of a model without even noticing the setting.
- The lost fetish, bottom line will explain.
Bottom Line: I don't know if it's an age thing or if maybe it's more of a more recent trend (thanks, smartphones) but I have this strange, unusual fetish of women undressing in dressing rooms and doing more to themselves while in there. I say strange even though I think it's much more common these days. I have dated a few women recently who liked sending pictures from the dressing room. You know the way that goes, "Do you like this outfit? Is this cute on me? Am I too old to be wearing this?" Then 376 pictures later, "How about this?" And the clothes magically disappeared.

Maybe that's the appeal of this site to me, the tease lasts about half of the video (20-25 minutes long scenes). You know you're getting old when a woman is sending you pictures and you're replying, "I'm getting hungry! And no, not in a sexual way!"

This site is in one way, very basic. The navigation is very simple and works as it should. The technical quality is the best I've seen when it comes to 100% of the content having these specs:
The videos are downloadable in 3 sizes, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I still don't have a 4K monitor so I can't say how crisp or clear those are but the 720p are very crisp and clear to me.
The pictures are downloadable and start with the model dressed, some of the outfits are very pretty, almost like it's what the model chose to wear or like they have a wardrobe specialist. The pictures are nearly 6000 long end.

The site is almost painfully exclusive feeling. What I mean by that, it's like they have very serious standards for their models. They have 58 scenes (videos and photos) but only 20 models. Which is good if you're like me and found a few you hadn't seen before, most have multiple shoots and outfits. At this point, it looks like this site should be rated very high unless removing points for the small size of it.

But ... why make a niche site that is untouched for the most part and make production mistakes that all but ruin the niche? First video I watched, the model teases, she's stripping, good site for those into panties, she starts masturbating and starts moaning loudly and groaning and squealing. A woman wouldn't masturbate in a store dressing room and moan and groan loudly! It's like writing a classic novel only to forget to proofread it.

That moaning is annoying enough but the scenes are dead silent. This isn't really a dressing room, is it? It's a box on the set? Where's the soft background music we would hear in stores? What about people randomly talking? This niche has a ton of potential but hearing a model's heels echo in a hollow room isn't part of the potential. That's sad to me.

I once watched an amateur that recorded herself masturbating in a dressing room. She was nearly biting her lip off to stop from moaning but someone bumped the door or went in the dressing room beside her and it aroused her, so a small moan slipped out. There's the potential. Something that makes this content look like it's a horny woman but not porn. Maybe I'm asking too much but anything to make scenes more than just basic masturbation scenes that are shot in the same room. I love to use my imagination when viewing porn but these production errors do make it almost too hard to imagine.

What saves them, besides the technical quality, are the models. I downloaded the content of 17 of the 20 models. Even found one model I'm not familiar with that I am going to have to look for, Apolonia Lapiedra, anyone that knows of more content of her let me know. She's engagement ring level.

I will also give them credit for not fudging the model's ages. Not that I know their ages but as mentioned, Lil' Caprice is here and instead of like most sites, she's not listed as 19, she's listed as 29. The youngest model on the site is 22, the oldest is 31. There is anal, vaginal masturbation but no sex, not even girl-girl. It's a girl and her toy in a box. Jill-in-the-box? Joking aside, I like this site for a one month join. They are updating twice a week but given that the videos are not that long, you will download most everything you want in a week (max). It's a very good, solo, panties, tease, masturbation site but every scene is in the box so I can't get the dressing room part out of my head.

I would recommend it for those who stand outside a dressing room and see a pretty woman walk in and start ignoring their wife asking them to get her a bigger size. If you're into "she would be that loud in public" (not your wife) then you'll love the content. I think panty fetishists also would enjoy this site. The scenes have roughly 10 minutes of tease at the beginning (formulaic?). For me the models made the site above average but that's really as far as I can go. Check the models out before joining and decide from there. Last, I did a similar of review of Fitness Rooms, with similar "problems" of the content just not being believable enough but it doesn't look like the sites are related.

09-11-18  05:14am

Replies (7)
Review
455
Visit Stiffia.com

Stiffia.com
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A large network of mostly reality porn type content, similar to Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...
- Good discounted price through TBP/PU
- Was careful about billing, if you join using Paypal, the biller is Epoch.
- Technical quality is high, 1080p option on every scene I've looked at it (as far back as I've looked 2012). Photo sets are small, but at least they have them in zips, most are close to 2000 long end.
- Download speeds are above average for me, about 75% of my max DL speed on pornsites.
- Seems to have some kind of reward program where you get to pick a "locked" site to open after 30 days of membership. That's almost a con since this site can be a bit frustrating to use.
- By my count, I have access to 27 sites and there's a couple more that are locked. The categories are fairly diverse, including a Japanese channel/site, a Lactating channel/site and a Cosplay channel/site.
- Looks exclusive to me, but I'm not going to guarantee it.
Cons: - Navigation. That was supposed to be read like this ... "navigation, period." The site can be confusing. There doesn't seem to be a network hub site where you can search across the network, but if there is, it's doing a good job of avoiding me. There's a "network" tab. From it you pick through the different niches. Which will be con two below this one. Once you pick the one you're interested in, the search box only seems to work within that site/channel, instead of the whole network.
- The channels/sites are even confusing. Some sound like porn studios like Harmony Vision, Herzog Videos, while others are just named after their niche like Cosplay and Filthy and Fisting.
- You could spend a month just trying to find a scene you saw on your screen, 20 minutes ago.
Bottom Line: I've considered joining Stiffia several times in the past since I do like the big reality networks, but I was always put off by the negative comments about frustrating billing hassles. Now that they have the option to join using Paypal/Epoch those billing concerns are gone.

My first thought as a member was, "What have I gotten myself into?" The site itself has a nice layout, clean, non-cluttered pages, but outside of just clicking on latest updates and scrolling through scene after scene, you're kind of stuck with figuring out their wonky search engine. I would fix these issues as simple as this:
Put a network search engine on every page.
Keep the search engine that only searches within one site/channel/niche. It's useful, it's just not real practical to a new member.
Put a network model search engine and again, keep the model search engine for each site/channel/niche.

It's not that big of a change, but it caused me to knock 15 points off my score. I spent way too much time trying to figure out what was what and what I was looking for. I don't think I've ever deducted that many points for any one con, but as you can see in my cons section, the navigation really took up 3 whole/different cons.

Once you figure out how to use the site, you've got yourself a real good network of porn. I just wonder how many people give up on it before figuring it out?

Here I go offering advice again. Merge some of these sites/channels together! I can't figure out what I'm going to find on each different channel. Give me a niche search or something. I just looked at a row of 6 videos, there's an interracial scene, two older women with younger men scenes, an anal scene, and two what looks to be amateur scenes.

Technical quality is very good. I've looked back into the older content and haven't found anything without the 1080p option. Videos are of good quality to my eyes. All kinds of hot models, including some I know of and quite a few I've never heard of. There seems to be a Greek/Spain influence in the models, but I'm not positive of that, just basing it on the female facial features and model names.

One more complaint: The videos have four download options. One option says, "Full HD (1920)", the next ones say "HD (1080)", "SD (720)", "Mobile (480)". Most of us know that 1080 is the height of a 1920x1080 movie, so why are there categories for 1920 and another one for 1080?

It's because they're labeled wrong. The "Full HD" is 1920x1080. The "HD 1080" is actually 1040x584 and the "SD 720" is 720x404. Which for lack of better word is confusing. I've always known 720 as 1280x720, which would still be bigger than the second option on here listed as "HD 1080". Maybe someone who runs it or does their programming doesn't know the difference in the resolutions?

Now that I'm done complaining there's still a really good network here. Problem is I'm as OCDC as anyone you'll ever know and these inconsistencies are going to pick at me until I don't like the network at all.

Normally, I would list all the sites and let the names of the different sites explain what you'll be seeing on those sites, but you can't with these "channels". Gonzo porn studios, reality porn studios, Japanese sex, anal, it's like joining a DVD site with no search engine or eating those jelly beans that are oddly-flavored and wondering if you just ate "booger" or "burger". Cue the Forrest Gump "life is like a box of chocolates" saying.

Still, the content isn't bad. Which is the point of joining a porn site. You have a nice mixture of younger models, older models, all the possible heterosexual niches and it's all in high quality video.

I've saved nearly 1,000 characters just to use for if I recommend it or not.

If you don't mind searching for good scenes, you will like this site. If things like crooked pictures on your bedroom wall don't bother you, you'll like this site. If your spouse leaving toothpaste stains in the sink don't bother you, you'll like this site. Better yet, if you have some extra time on your hands and like the idea of exploring the many niches (that's a big compliment), you'll like this site. As a matter of fact, if you sometimes feel like you don't get the most out of your membership to sites because you download everything you want in the first week, then don't go back, give this site a shot. I can all but promise you, you won't find everything you want in a week.

I'm trying my best not to be too negative here since I understand most people are not as easily-annoyed as I am. And I want it to be known that this site can at least to some extent, compare to the bigger, better-known networks like Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, and their porn studio sites are comparable to most porn studios.

But I'm going to say despite my 84 score, I don't see me coming back to this site until they do something with the navigation, search engine and model list.

01-30-17  11:14pm

Replies (0)
Review
456
Visit Chicas Loca

Chicas Loca
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A good-looking network that can't seem to make up its mind about what language they speak. This review is for the premium network included with Chicas Locas not just Chicas Locas. They go by the name of porndoe, but couldn't find a hub page to review the network on.
- Good introduction TBP/PU price of 9.95, but should be noted I was charged in Euros not dollars, which was $11 and some change.
- Several interesting and underproduced genres are included in the network.
- Models are mostly younger, 18-25, but they have a few much older models as well. Reminds me a lot of Reality King's style of models. Lots of Latina models that look to be amateur, at least I don't recognize them.
- Blazing fast download speeds at 8MB/s on my connection. I can sometimes get up over 9MB/s, but 8 is very high for me on a porn site.
- I'll go into the numbers in the BL, there's quite a bit of content available for the 9.95 price.
- Navigation is good in some places and just terrible in others.
Cons: - Here's the big one. If you join for 9.95 you're limited on how many videos you can download per day. TBP lists 3 per day, but the site now says 5. If you join for 24.95, you receive unlimited downloads and 8 more bonus sites.
- Well, some site names are Spanish, I think others are German at least I think it's German, French and English too. They have a button to switch the language to English, but that doesn't change the site names to English, so you have to click on a site and check it out to figure out what genre is.
- Centrobill came up as my payment processor. Those people get my card rejected and cause my bank to send me a text about suspicious activity. Luckily, after rejecting my payment, Epoch came up as the secondary payment processor and approved the same card.
Bottom Line: This is one of those blind joins I usually hate. I saw it in the new site listing on TBP and decided to give it a try since if nothing else it has amateur Latina girls on it.

I'm admittedly torn on this review. This network has tons of potential, but they use an upgrade system. Get in for 9.95, but if you want to download more than 5 videos a day or want to see all their sites, you'll have to pay another 15.00. It's bad business. Hit a middle ground on the prices, make it unlimited, you'll save yourself a lot of headaches.

What's great about this network is the quality. The videos have up to 1080p option and some of them have as high as 14,000 bitrates. I prefer the 720p which has 8,000 bitrates, but that's because I don't want to download a 4 GB file. One of the 720p files I downloaded earlier was over 2 GB, nearly 50 minutes long. I like the camerawork they use. It's very similar to Bang Bros and Reality Kings. The girls aren't all perfect. You get a blend of slightly chubby, very slim, tall, short, pretty, not so pretty, young, old and so on. This is my preferred style of models on a site.

The navigation overall isn't bad. I know zero models on this network so I went to the model list and just scanned through until I found ones I liked. It has a few good features like the ability to click on a model's name then you can see all of her content on the network. It has a "network" tab that opens up a page with all their sites on it. That's good, but what the hell is a Hausfrau Fricken? Looks like frathouse fucking? It wouldn't hurt to put an English translation under the site names that are not in English. What about a XXX Omas? Does it mean many orgasms? The navigation on the content pages could also be better. As example, La Novice, which I guess is French Amateurs, there's a section with 12 videos, 6 per line with an arrow to open up 6 more scenes on each line. Then down below the scenes it says, "Channel Pornstars". Huh? Beside of that it says "Channel Albums". What? And beside of that it says, "Related Channels". Dude? In all seriousness, I understand what those mean, but why are they floating around in the content area? Isn't there a tab at the top for all sites and pornstars?

On a side note, there was no cross-sales on the join page and there's no advertising in the member's area. It's like they tried to give you too many ways to find the content. Some advice from an old porn reviewer, keep it simple. It gives me and others less to complain about.

The videos are good. I've watched quite a few and liked them. You can download the photo sets in zip files, but they're nothing too great. They're only 1080 on the long end. Maybe the download speed is thanks to them being a newer site with fewer members. I consistently go over 8MB/s on downloads.

Their overall numbers of scenes is pretty good, but I doubt I'll download more than 40-50 scenes total. Picture set downloads do not count against your daily limit of 5.

Some numbers as of 8/29/2016:
Over 500 models, but it's impossible for me to count them all since they include male models in their model list. Still, I would feel safe saying there's 400+ women models, of note, they have a whole site dedicated to older models (both men and women) so there could be a whole section of models you won't like if you don't like older or vice versa. My age cutoff limit stops at MILFs. I love grandmothers in real life, but they've no business in my fantasies or sexual thoughts.

23 sites, not including the VIP sites. Some of these sites are very small (30-35 videos).

974 listed scenes across the network. From the best I can tell that number does not include the VIP sites or photo sets, but this is where the annoying navigation comes into play again. Where's a filter button?

Should have mentioned earlier they have a site that works nearly identical to Bang Bus called Bums Bus. What I do like however is innocent lesbian sex on their site A Girl Knows, which doesn't even seem like it belongs on the network. The Chicas Locas site has what I would consider amateur Latina girls, which is a dying genre and one of my favorites.

So, overall, I think the network is good, above-average even, but I think the next year will play a huge role in how it develops. If they continue to shoot the same kind of porn as now and work on their site (navigation, cleaner interface) they will eventually catch up to the Reality Kings, Team Skeet, type networks. After saying Team Skeet, I would compare this network to it as well, especially in Team Skeet's earlier days. I don't regret joining for the 9.95 option, it's opened up my eyes to a new site I had never heard of. Good blend of genres as well. They even have a tranny site and on top of that, they aren't using the same dozen guys you're used to seeing on the American networks. It's hard not to recommend it since I believe it's worth the price and they look like a good alternative to the American networks.

08-29-16  12:38am

Replies (3)
Review
457
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed.
Cons: - My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes.
Bottom Line: FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.

I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.

It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.

The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.

What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.

Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.

I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.

As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site.

12-03-12  01:00pm

Replies (11)
Review
458
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content, lots of teen models, and the network provides multiple niches for a good TBP discounted price.
- New videos are HD, even some of the older videos are HD and this is the first network I've seen with HD voyeur content.
- Some truly enchanting, pretty, seductive models like Marina F, Pussika and Maxine.
- I'm receiving good download speeds unless I only download one file at a time. With only 1 file downloading, my download speed is 700 kb/s. I, on average, can download from most sites at 1.5-2.0 mb/s. If I download multiple files from here then I can reach the speed when combined.
- A couple of sites really stand out, I especially like Beauty Angels.
- Network has steady updates, for the last week there have been 10 updates across the network, so a little more than 1 per day on average.
- Navigation is pretty good, simple, which I think works best for a site of this size.
Cons: - Right off the bat, you can add 10 points to the review if your preferences in models are slim, small chested and amateurish. It was a major con for me. I tried to open my mind a little by joining this network. I almost always like curvy, average build, exotic women, ethnic models and there just aren't many of those on here. I don't think it's the site fault though. They advertise teens and these girls look like teens.
- Inconsistencies, though I'm not taking much off the score, I do think there are too many inconsistencies which I will go into in the BL.
- Can't understand anything the models say which is a problem on the sites that have a theme or story to their scenes, even worse, most of the subtitles are not helping, will explain in BL.
- Very formulaic scenes, this is always a problem, as I've said before with niche sites, but without any language understanding it becomes even worse here.
Bottom Line: The biggest problem I had with this network is one that I think needs to be mentioned for potential members to know, not only from the bad side of it, but good side too. These models, taking a rough estimate, 80-90% are skinny, small boobs, more hipbones than curves, true teenage models and builds. I say that since some people may be looking for that style of model. If so, you will love this site. If not, you will still probably like it, like I did, you'll find a few models here and there that you like, but you won't love the site.

A problem I ran into that continues from the previous paragraph is that I normally do not search out skinny, small-chested, tiny butt models, so I only knew a few models on this network. I discovered Marina F, very seductive in her pictures and a hint of an exotic look. Otherwise, I was downloading and hoping for the best.

Those inconsistencies: Most sites in the network have zipped photos which is always a plus, but a few didn't have any photos. Filenames are odd, but most sites these days are. Reality Kings is one of the few networks that names their scenes and I wish more sites would consider this. The problem here on this network, some scenes don't even have model info. I usually get around the filename problem by saving to a folder named after the model. Not working on these, instead I have 43 videos named "high (1), high (2), high (3)" and so on.

The formulaic approach to scenes is made worse by the language barrier. I don't know if the model is asking the guy to fix her Volkswagen or give it to her hard. I can't blame the site for trying with subtitles, but really, those aren't helping much. An example from a Tricky Masseur scene. These may not be the exact words but are close.
Man to model laying on table with towel around bottom half: You must take towel off to reach maximum efficiency.
Model: No
Man: If you leave towel on you only get 10-100% efficiency.
Model: Okay (takes towel off)
Man: I must take my clothes off for you to reach maximum efficiency.

Funny? Sure. Erotic? No.

I really mean no offense on that part. I would even say do away with the subtitles, most porn fans understand the guy is not really tricking the model. This looks like a case of the site trying too hard.

On the score, I did go outside my comfort zone by joining this network. Most of these models to me are interchangeable.

Attention: As example, I would love to know who the model on the Tricky Masseur home page is, but I can't separate these models from each other by looking at them. That's how similar the models are to each other. Being someone who likes ethnic diversity, curvy, big butts, bouncy boobs, there just wasn't a lot here for me.

Still not going to be a negative review as I know we have a lot of fans of these slim models and if you are one then I would recommend this site highly. If not, I would still say give it a try. There are quite a few of these models that are charismatic and worth a look.

04-15-11  04:41pm

Replies (2)
Review
459
Visit Black Ice Pass

Black Ice Pass
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nearly all black porn, some stretching the truth exists as some of the darker Hispanic models are being listed as black, but it's one of the bigger collections of black models on the internet.
- 210 DVDs, 1,100 scenes, 466 of the scenes are listed as having the 1920x1080 resolution option.
- Has more photo sets than ZTOD, nearly 750 photo sets are available though to my eye, they are most likely just screencaps, but are at least zipped.
- Has over 20 scenes with some of the top black female stars, a real rarity in my opinion, since finding 3 or 4 scenes of some of these beautiful models is hard to do.
- Comes with access to ZTOD and 3rd Movies
- TBP discount of $19.95 makes it a good join for all of these rare scenes.
- ZTOD hasn't updated in nearly 3 weeks, but Black Ice Pass has updated in the last week, so maybe they will continue to update it.
Cons: - Download speed is a pain on this site. Seems to download even slower than ZTOD. I downloaded two HD scenes over 1 GB each and had to wait nearly an hour for them to download.
- May not be the most popular thing to say, but black male pornstars are available in nearly all mainstream porn, interracial porn, too many of these DVDs are black men with white women. I'm still waiting for some site to deliver a black woman site, with white men, black men, Asian men, etc...
- One of the most disappointing things for me, one series I was looking forward to downloading, The Big Ass Slumber Party series is here, 7 or 8 volumes of it. I've found these scenes in the past to be some of the best lesbian porn I've seen. I go to download a couple of the older scenes and received broken link messages that the videos were not found. This happened on all but 2 scenes in volume 2.
Bottom Line: The main thing you're going to get here is some truly beautiful black women in hardcore sex. The problem is the site itself. DVDs titled, "My wife was robbed" featuring black men with white women. Blah, blah, blah, it's redundant after the 1,000th scene based on bad black man taking advantage of sweet, innocent white housewife. The site does sell itself on its black female models. If you go to the main page that's all you'll see. So, why they are pushing typical interracial DVDs out is beyond my comprehension.

I can't complain about the quality. Nearly half of the scenes are available in 1920x1080 resolution, the pictures are nice, though small and they are zipped.

Broken links plagued many of the older videos they have on here and if not broken links, then half the video options they usually have are not working and you end up downloading a low quality DIVX file. I think someone's tech crew took an extended break.

If you're familiar with Pinky, they do have a few of her videos and even a couple of her DVDs. These usually are lesbian DVDs, as I do believe Pinky is a real lesbian, not just a for pay lesbian. You end up getting some of the most believable and realistic lesbian porn on the internet with her DVDs.

Download speeds, just tested while typing out this review, on one of the newer scenes, 1.15 MB/s. I top out in the 3.0-3.2 MB/s range so you can see, I'm maybe getting 1/3 my best speed and less than half my average speed. Important to note that some of these scenes are well over 2 GB each. You're going to be here for awhile if you want the HD versions.

It's still hard to completely slam the site for its technical problems because you're going to get a very nice collection of black models if you stick with it. A couple of favorites with large amounts of scenes include:

Cherokee Dass - 25 scenes, Delotta Brown - 13 scenes, Tia Sweets - 10 scenes, Angel Eyes - 10 scenes. Tia seems to be more widely available, but Delotta doesn't have nearly enough content on most sites, but the 13 scenes here make this site worth joining for me just for her scenes. Also 16 scenes of Candice Nicole.

The questionable use of Latina models as black can be seen easily with 11 scenes of Ice La Fox. I usually favor Latina models, so I'm not really complaining as much as I am saying, if you're going to sell your site as a black model site, have black models.

On its own, I would probably still join it one time. Once combined with ZTOD and 3rd Movies, it is still a very good deal again, the archived movies are worth a month membership. My only way I've found to combat the slow download speed is to download 4 scenes at one time. Even then, the combined speed is still only around 1.7 MB/s. Recommended, especially if you're having trouble finding black models, but I can't say it would be worth more than a one month join.

05-31-10  11:58pm

Replies (1)
Review
460
Visit Teen Dreams Network

Teen Dreams Network
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-22-09  11:27pm  (Update History)
Reason: Reviewed the site during 2nd week of membership, gave them a few weeks to fix Viv Thomas bonus content, but never did, adjusted score accordingly.
Pros: - Teen Dream Network, 13 solo model sites, the sites when combined make for a nice introduction to Euro models.
- Quality on all content varies, but videos stay at 640 high end or above and pictures are 1280 or above, most pictures are in the 2000 high end range and all come zipped.
- Viv Thomas bonus content, I still believe this is the very best bonus content deal on the internet. Viv's video and photo site would cost $50 to join both and you get access to lower quality, but ok, video and pictures here.
- Some of the content on each site seems to be exclusive, at least to my eyes.
- Navigation is smooth, except for having to sign in on each site.
- Fast DLs, if the models on this network are enough for you, you might like this better than the Teen Dreams site.
Cons: - At least half of the content of each site is available on Teen Dreams main site. Some of the other content is widely licensed and you get a small amount, I'm estimating 30% at most content that is exclusive to this network.
- Viv bonus content has been problematic for a year now, including on Teen Dreams main site, the best way to describe it is moody. It doesn't like some firewalls. So you have to do some tweaking to get it to work.
- Updates are the only thing more moodier than the bonus content. I noticed that Peaches website hasn't been updated since 2008.
Bottom Line: EDIT: Lowered score to 84, mainly for the Eve and Zuzanna sites. Could not get the Viv Thomas bonus content to download with the TD Network account, so removed 4 points from score. Viv content downloads fine with Teen Dream account The Viv bonus content to me is a huge selling point and if not for the Eve and Zuzanna content, I would be hard pressed to recommend this network.

The sites break down into these 13 models, Eve Angel, Zuzanna Z, Lucky, Peaches, Tiffany, Suzie, Ira, Monika V, Vicky, Regina, Denisa/Gina, Irena Marci.

I'm not real familiar with Ira, Regina or Vicky, but the other 10 are top tier Euro models. You get the Teen Dreams quality in most of the sets, the pictures are up and around 2000 high end in most cases, some of the older licensed content is down in the 1280 area, but you do at least get zipped files.

The videos range from 640 to 1280 high end, bitrates range from 1000 to 4400.

To me, even in my years and hundreds of sites joined, I often get frustrated on Teen Dreams because of the sheer number of models. We've all talked about the TD search engine and how who knows where it will send you, but when you join this network, you know exactly which models you are getting and all you do is click their link and go to their site.

I really don't know what the problem is with the Viv bonus content, but I first had the problem last year while a member of the main site Teen Dreams. I continue to have the problem, I have noticed that I don't seem to have the problem as often when using Internet Explorer instead of Firefox.

Here are the numbers from each site.

Eve Angel - 50 picture sets, 36 videos. Peaches - 40 picture sets, 10 videos. Denisa/Gina - 56 picture sets, 14 videos. Zuzanna Z - 45 picture sets, 10 videos. Marci - 17 picture sets, 0 videos. Regina - 20 picture sets, 7 videos. Ira - 23 picture sets, 6 videos. Irena - 38 picture sets, 5 videos. Suzie - 48 picture sets, 14 videos. Tiffany - 34 picture sets, 7 videos. Vicky - 16 picture sets, 5 videos. Monika V - 42 picture sets, 5 videos. Lucky - 30 picture sets, 8 videos.

As you can see, the numbers are not staggering, but as an overall site that focuses on top tier models, it is very good. Some of that Lucky content looks to be new, like Eve, Lucky's weight varies, especially in her newer content.

I have downloaded all the content on the site and plan on keeping all of it except for maybe the Vicky content, so that should at least vouch for the quality of these models. There is very little b/g hardcore in these sets, one of the newer Lucky videos is hardcore, but the vast majority of the content is solo masturbation.

The score could seem a little high since half of this content is available on Teen Dreams, but the other half makes up for it and I think for a person who hasn't been to TD, this network could be a real diamond in the rough. Though the updates do not make the future look too bright. Still I recommend it, especially for newcomers to Euro girls.

04-12-09  11:05pm

Replies (0)
Review
461
Visit Sweet Eva

Sweet Eva
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Teen Dreams Network, 13 solo sites for $19.99
- Has SOME exclusive Eve content, not a lot though, overall content number isn't bad considering it is part of a network.
- 36 total videos, 50 picture sets, just going from my knowledge of Eve's content, less than 10 of the videos are exclusive and less than 10 of the picture sets are exclusive, but probably 20% of content comes from Eve's still listed as "official" site, not Teen Dreams are widely licensed content, so if you haven't been to her official site around half of the content will be new to you.
- Viv Thomas bonus content, both picture and videos from Viv's own sites, excellent content, especially videos.
- Sizes of pictures and videos vary, will explain in BL
- Very fast DL speeds, starting to think not many people on these sites
- Nice navigation that makes downloading, especially picture sets, very easy, zipped pictures.
Cons: - Updates are sporadic at best
- Several movies will not work, will explain in BL, to show how to know this content is not exclusive, not even to the TD family of sites.
- Viv Thomas content is hit or miss, not in quality or if it is good, but sometimes the damn things won't even download or stream. It downloads a 336 byte error file instead
- To the ultimate of cons, a solo model site of Eve Angel and one of the sets of pictures listed of course as Eve, since it is her solo site, does not have Eve in the set, instead, a young Angel Dark, who did, when younger look a little like Eve. I'm sorry but that is dreadful to see a solo site that can't even identify Eve correctly.
Bottom Line: Will also re-review the entire network. I wanted to focus mainly on Eve's by itself since it is the largest of the sites and I know there are a lot of Eve fans who might be looking for content of her that they don't have.

This site has by my count, 8 videos that are exclusive to it. For me, those 8 videos were worth $20. Also 4 on Viv's bonus content that I don't have, including a really great g/g scene with Vivien/Wivien/Gitta.

Here is the problem, the site still claims to be exclusive and while I cannot say that they shouldn't claim sets that are on Teen Dreams as exclusive, I can tell you that not everything on here is from Teen Dreams or exclusive.

For one, there is the newer one of Eve by the pool that nearly every major site has, orange bikini. Then to add to this, there are no less than 7 sets that are from eveangel.com.

To make that even worse, 2 of the videos are STILL corrupt, just like they were on eveangel.com. You download them, click play and they play, but you cannot scan through the movie. I have both of those from Eve's site in .mov files since the .wmv they have here is still impossible to scan through. I believe I would be having a talk with that webmaster over there for licensing content out that is corrupt and has been for 2 years.

Overall, the site would be a good way to get into Eve's material and the other models, especially for a newcomer to porn. The picture sets are up to 3,000 high end, and a couple of the videos are even HD, but if you have been a member on Eve's site and the other sites that carry a lot of licensed content like Twistys, Teen Dreams, ATK, Babelicious, you've already seen most of this.

There are though the exclusive videos I mentioned earlier and the Viv bonus content too, if you can get it to work.

The varying in size and quality is always a telltale sign of licensed content and that is what happens here. I've seen videos as high as HD quality, down to 640 high end and the pictures vary from 1280 up to 3000 high end.

For me, it was worth it, but I'm an Eve collector and wanted those rare videos I hadn't seen before. A couple do look newer too. You can usually tell Eve's newer content by her slightly heavier, slightly more bustier figure.

I most likely will never change my stance that Eve is the best solo model in porn. I've watched hundreds, maybe thousands of solo porn model videos and never seen one except maybe Tianna Lynn, that is as believable as Eve. She bring seduction, beautiful long hair and face, cute smile and great body, a full package if you will.

As for the updates, your guess is as good as mine and that isn't just with this site, all the sites in the network seem to have update spurts then die off for months at a time with no updates.

Worth joining for the exclusive videos for Eve fans, Viv bonus and overall the network is a good deal too, but be forewarned that this content is far from 100% exclusive.

04-12-09  10:17pm

Replies (5)
Review
462
Visit Sandy's Fantasies

Sandy's Fantasies
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - My monthly "should have known better and listened" guilty pleasure site join!
- More DDF goodness with some of my favorite Euro models, and I didn't have most of the content.
- Though this will be a con, the site is dead, no updates, giving a pro though because DDF has the decency to post on the site before joining that it no longer updates, showing that rare honesty.
- Though a small collection, the 160+ picture sets and 160+ videos are all very good.
- Though it hasn't been updated in a year, it still has zips for the photo sets, the videos though not as good as most new videos are better than about half of the porn site's NEW ones at 640 high end with a 2000 bitrate
- Very fast downloads, probably not a lot of members downloading. Downloaded whole site in 5 days of limited downloaded time per day.
Cons: - Not updating, should be clear as the TBP review tells it as does the actual site before you join. So, I am knocking it only because I really like the content that I have downloaded and am saying that I wish it was still updating.
- Maybe lower the price since it isn't updating or include it with one of the other 1byday sites or for an even more attractive option, how about if a person lets a DDF site recur for a second month, they get access to Sandy's Fantasies? Just a thought.
Bottom Line: Cons were hard to come by, the quality was plenty good enough, zips, great model selection, but the one big con is a huge one. I really wished this site was still going. I've always liked Sandy as a model, her and Mia Stone are my favorite blonde models. Every other model on here is also a star these days, and I would guess real life friends of Sandy since they are very common on her site.

Think about this, though not updating for well over a year they have full photo set zips, which I would say 50% of active sites don't have and their top video quality is 640 high end with 2,000 bitrate, which is higher than many still active sites.

I'm not for sure why Spencer scored it so low, the score almost turned me away from joining it. I can find very little wrong with the site except that it is dead. I don't know if the content is exclusive, but it was new to me and I have a pretty large collection of content from the featured models.

While I do believe the price is too high considering that you will never join it again though, it isn't too bad and makes the site another of those good ones for collectors.

My biggest reason for joining it is that I am sucker for these Euro models, and I collect several of the models' content. Plus, the quality was plenty good enough for me. If you like Euro models like Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, Eve Angel, and want some what looks to be younger content of Sandy, this is an above average site in all aspects.

For those that are like me, I recommend trying it since you can clean the whole site out easily on a one month membership.

08-24-08  10:04am

Replies (1)
Review
463
Visit Adriana Sage

Adriana Sage
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - One of the greatest Latin models of all-time
- Price is fair enough at $19.95
- No joke, most of the content really is exclusive, I guess that is partly because finding solo Adriana content is not very common
- Videos are downloadable in QT with no DRM, and have decent bitrate at 1100+ but see cons
- Webcam appearances are really good, she seems to really enjoy performing for her fans
- Download speeds are fine for me
Cons: - WMV files that are better quality than the QT files are DRM protected, trust me, I tried it! I joined 3-4 months ago and downloaded the files as WMV, they didn't work once the subscription ran out.
- QT files that are downloadable and don't have DRM are only 300 high end
- I still have trouble getting online for scheduled webcam shows, sorry, I find that a con since I can't change my schedule to include cam shows
- Pictures are 1024 at best, and are not available in zips, but see bottom line
Bottom Line: Adriana Sage is without question one of the finest performers in the porn industry. Unlike so many others, that I won't name, that come from Hispanic backgrounds, she has not had her boobs inflated.

The site can be a work in patience though. I miss the webcam shows which is definitely frustrating, but I did find out that you can download the pictures with Free Download Manager, ticking the .jpeg only option, it will download those into a folder you pick.

The videos, while the WMV files are pretty good quality 520 high end, they are DRM protected and the bitrate is actually lower than the QT files. The QT files are smaller resolution, but are NOT protected by DRM. I wanted to make sure to put that since I had been hesitant to join because of the DRM.

The good thing is, you can get over 100 videos of Adriana that you won't see on other sites, except for one or two, I'd call it 90% exclusive content. The bad thing, you won't find b/g sets here that Adriana is known for. This is a solo and g/g site.

Adriana solo is fine, since you don't really see her is solo that much until this site came along, and just like her b/g sets, her performances are worth the money. She is one of the more genuine acting porn stars, that really seems to care about her fans and giving a good performance as well.

Download speeds were very good, and the added benefit of being able to download the pictures in the DL manager made the score go up some.

Definite recommend for Adriana fans!

07-19-08  10:38am

Replies (1)
Review
464
Visit Czech Babes

Czech Babes
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - One of my "great finds" sites that I stumbled across while looking at some TGP sites.
- The model list is one of the best on the internet. Aneta Keys, Susana Spears, Veronica Vanoza, not to mention probably 3 or 4 that I had never seen before that were grade A quality themselves.
- The videos are pretty good with a minimum of 640 high end, and a good bitrate. The videos look clearer than most 640 videos I have seen...but see cons.
- The pictures are 1600 high end range, no zips, but the site works pretty well with free download manager to download a set in a few minutes or so without having to play click, save as, click, save as for each file.
- Comes off as a really classy/artsy type site and does a good job filling that niche.
Cons: - No new content that I can see, I've only known about the site for a few months and saw nothing new to speak of.
- Videos have some light masturbation here and there, but a good portion of the videos are video of the photoshoots.
- No zips still is pretty frustrating, even with a download manager that works.
- Now for the big one, the damn site goes down daily and the download speeds are bad, I was getting speeds of 200 kb/s tops, 1000 is around my average speed.
Bottom Line: Here we go with one of those bi-polar reviews. I absolutely love the model selection on this site. I downloaded nearly every model's content and will keep the majority of it. I love the way they have the models in normal clothes. Aneta Keys has a set with jeans and t-shirt on, that turns into crotchless panties.

On model selection alone, this site would score in the 90s. The photography also is of good quality, nice poses, many that show the models laughing and joking around. At this point I am loving the site.

Then I start watching the videos and the videos on here are pretty much whatever the opposite of vidcaps are, in action pictures, I guess you could say. Most of the videos have the girls walking around, preparing to pose, and if you want to see perfect timing by their webmaster, look at Aneta Keys sample video. What you see on the site is Aneta sitting on the edge of a bathtub in what looks to be ecstasy, when in fact, when you watch the video itself, it is somewhere between her laughing and trying to reach down to get water from the tub.

No zips, which is becoming a pet peeve of mine. The pictures are of good quality though, 1600 high end, and maybe to switch back to the other pole for a second, this content is 100% exclusive as far as I know.

They also have a very good preview that shows all of their models and lets you see some samples.

Overall, I will recommend it for one month and wish that the webmaster would come back and start updating again!

06-17-08  12:42am

Replies (1)
Review
465
Visit Kelly Madison

Kelly Madison
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - If you like big boobs, Kelly is the perfect site for you!
- Videos have good resolution, 640 on the high end, but the bitrate is a rather disappointing 700k, if you have a higher end computer, the video will seem a little clunky.
- Pictures aren't high resolution, but they are downloadable in zips, so I'm calling it a pro.
- Impressive amount of content, over 1,700 videos
- Trial is full trial, but I liked the content enough to let it go over for a full month
- Also touches on the married fetish, of wife and husband having sex with younger woman.
Cons: - Content as expected does become repetitive
- No high resolution on pictures
- The aforementioned bitrate on videos, 1000k should be the minimum.
- Comes off more as a novelty site that you might join once per year
- The girls added to the husband/wife for a threesome are often very similar to Kelly, huge boobs, slim butt
Bottom Line: I joined this site out of curiosity to see the married couple having threesomes. It isn't a bad site at all. Kelly, is a very attractive woman, though I can't help but think she looks a lot like Kirstie Alley from Cheers.

The quality of everything is just good enough. None of it will blow you away. Picture resolution tops out at 1240, videos are 640 high end, but that 600-700 bitrate is just too slow. It is like for every plus, there is a minus. Low res pictures but are downloadable in zips. Good resolution movies, but have slow bitrates.

Sex is believable which is a big plus. Kelly doesn't seem to be as into it in the newer videos, still she puts on a very good performance. Some of the women who join the threesomes really do look like clones of Kelly, that can be a little unrealistic since I would imagine a husband/wife that had threesomes would go more for a woman who isn't like the wife. That is the reminder this is still porn, and not just an amateur couple.

The download speeds are about average for me. You will find yourself looking at 4-5 movies and thinking you only need one of them since the women do favor each other. You've seen the look blondish hair, big boobs, little tiny waist and butt. I would like to see more curvy below the waist models added in or else it feels like this site is just a niche site for big boob lovers.

I enjoyed the content enough to let the trial rebill for one month, but not more than 1 month. For 1 month recommended!

02-23-08  08:17am

Replies (0)
Review
466
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some truly exotic locations and even more so exotic models. (See con)
- Picture dominated site, newer sets are massive in size, great quality all the way around.
- TBP price is really good, I was on here last year, and it was $35, TBP is $19.95.
- Buy a year long membership for $99.95 and get a Hegre special art print worth $300 autographed by Petter.
- I'm getting above average download speeds from USA.
Cons: - Despite the gorgeous exotic models, there are also some really plain, need to be fed models.
- Videos aren't very good. The quality isn't that good and even worse, most of the action is tame.
- I could see this site becoming boring after awhile, most of the settings, though exotic have the same colors and become repititive
- Some of the posing is pointless. It really takes the "Art" part very seriously.
- Navigation is a little iffy, best word I can think of to describe it.
Bottom Line: I've been on here one time before, about a year ago, and paid the full price of $35. It kind of turned me against the site since I definitely didn't think it was worth $35. With the new price with the TBP discount, there is now some worth to the site. I like this site better than Met-Art. Met-Art is just too far into the extreme softcore for my tastes, Hegre at least has some content that keeps my interest.

The women in general are beautiful. I like most all exotic women, and Hegre has plenty of the slim, but busty ones that are probably from the Russian Federation. The locations are great, but the locations become repetitive. I'm starting to think we are asking too much of these sites.

The pictures alone are worth joining for a month, but if you are a video fan, this site is not for you. I enjoy looking at pictures that are artsy, but not videos that are artsy. The quality of the movies isn't very good either, you are getting maybe average at best. It is one of those sites that you think one thing is great, another is bad. I do believe the large amount of content, daily updates, and quality of picture sets makes it a good one month join.

I'm on a 10M connection and get 1,200 kb/s on downloads which makes grabbing all I will want in a month really easy. I honestly can't say that I plan on keeping more than maybe 5 of the videos though. If you're into glam, give it a try, it has that much needed wow factor and will give you $20 worth of pictures.

09-04-07  02:26am

Replies (5)
Review
467
Visit Ultimate Sex Pass

Ultimate Sex Pass
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Editing entire review, mistake on my part.*
- Over 2,000 DVDs, 11,000+ scenes
- Lots of content that is either older and I hadn't seen or never been on other sites
- TBP price is $14.95 which is a great deal
- Some niche material that you won't find on most sites (explained in BL)
- Site is not advertised correctly, but you get more than you expect.
- Have lots of picture sets that are not from the movies, though pics are not exclusive
Cons: - Navigation is still pretty bad, but once used to it, it is average at best.
- Quality is better than I first realized, but it is still only 1000 bitrate, 460x340 res.
- Also listed as a pro, not exactly what you think you are getting so you do miss some content that is advertised.
- Video starts playing when you try to download, must stop, then download.
Bottom Line: First, an apology for posting a review that wasn't really complete. I had contacted their Customer Service, but had no reply. They replied a day after this review, explaining the navigation.

This is still not a network of sites. It is one site. A DVD site just like videobox. When you go to sign-up, it sells itself as a network. They wouldn't answer why in the email.

Once I understood the site, I found that this is one pretty nice DVD site. How many have seen a lot of Adrianne Sage videos on the internet? I haven't, she is one of my favorites and has 13 scenes on this site. Nautica Thorn has 20. Nikita Denise has 24, which shows this isn't a network.

There are pictures, but most can be found on Twistys or a similar site, still it is a nice touch, you can't download in zip though and the pictures aren't real big. Video quality is still questionable, but 1000 bitrate isn't horrible, size is decent enough at 460x340.

It has several bad points, but those are not that bad that I wouldn't give the site a try. Plus, hidden camera DVDs that I've never seen anywhere. Nearly the full collection of Legal Skin DVDs as another example. There is one model, known as Nikki Bellucci aka Foxy, they have 6 clips of her, never seen more than 2 on a site. This is a site that if you have the time you are likely to find some really rare clips that you've not seen. Navigation and bad advertising issues aside, I'm going to recommend it. Not more than a month, but worth checking out!

08-07-07  01:46am

Replies (0)
Review
468
Visit Crissy Moran

Crissy Moran
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Great value when considering the bonus content, amateursgonebad, glamourmodelsgonebad, lonniewaters and nataliacruze.
- Crissy is one of those head turning models, and you will find most of her online content on this site.
- Around 350 photos shoots, very good res and quality
- Over 40 videos, if you are a Crissy fan you know how hard it is to find any videos of her, a few hardcore, including b/g.
- One new Crissy photo set per week
Cons: - Nitpicking here, have to sign in on each site
- Not for sure about the interaction with Crissy since she is retired, though the main page talks about sending in requests.
Bottom Line: I really want to review this along with Natalia and Lonnie's sites, since I think the "Gone Bad" sites could realistically stand on their own. Crissy's site itself is as good as many solo sites, and has as much content as most solo sites. The only problem is, a good portion of this stuff has been seen on other sites. Similar to when you join Aria Giovanni's site, you've probably seen most of it already.

On the other hand, it is all here in one convienent place, and the pictures are available in zipfiles. The server for downloads is better than average speed, so you can download all of the content in probably a night or two, depending on your connection speed. Her site alone is worth $25 just to get all of this material of her.

Lonnie Waters has never been a favorite of mine. I just rarely find blondes that I am that attracted to. If the blonde has content on a site similar to this where I also get Crissy, then I will check it out, and Lonnie's comes off more as a bonus site. Less than 100 photo sets and less than 10 videos, it would rate about a 60 by itself.

Natalia Cruze is gorgeous, and her site has only a couple of videos, but before those I had never seen any. She is very much on the glamour side of modeling so anything that shows more than a nipple slip is more than I had seen. It is still a small site 75 or so pic sets, less than 5 videos, but when combined with Crissy's very good site and Lonnie's fair site, it makes this a nice package. Recommended!

07-09-07  11:12am

Replies (0)
Review
469
Visit Abby Winters

Abby Winters
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Really interested, perky, even dare I say sweet models
- Great TBP price, which I'm starting to take as a sign of confidence from the site that gives the discount!
- Some of the models are very cute, and again, they have personalities that show
- The quality on videos and pics are both well above average
- My wife likes it better than I do! Hint there to you men who have wifes that like porn, very normal, down to earth models on here, so wife has no reason to be insecure!
Cons: - Anyone who has read my reviews knows this site is not my usual join, the amateur sites just don't do it for me.
- I feel bad about saying this, but I'm trying to be honest, I only found maybe 35% of the models attractive
Bottom Line: I probably should have let my wife write this review. First of all, if you like amateurs, no overly done beauty makeovers, nothing really extravagent, just your average girls that you could speak to in any city across the world, this is an excellent site!

My wife loves the site. I told her to let it cancel for a month, so I can check out some new sites. I won out, but will be back again in a month or two. Having grown up in a city that is based on glamour, image, I never really knew many just normal girls, so I guess that effects me and my perception of this site. I actually bumped the score up since I'm taking my wife's view of the site into account.

I don't require a woman to be shaven in the pubic area, but I personally can't get into women who don't even trim.

I know this may sound crazy, and probably goes against what the site is about, but I would just like to throw this out there. Is it possible that the site might throw in a really gorgeous woman for one of the average women to maybe seduce? I'd sign up for a year for that! My complaints are just some personal issues with hygeine, I'm one of those over-reacting germ people.

I will recommend it as highly as possible, it really is a great site that I wish the "pro" sites would take notes from. But if you are into glam like I am, I'd still say try it out, it has a charm about it. Just don't expect to see the big name actresses, but don't be surprised that some of these cute girls get your attention!

06-21-07  01:24am

Replies (5)
Review
470
Visit Super Glam

Super Glam
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some of the prettiest, highest quality pictures I have seen on the internet!
- Content is 100% exclusive
- Has most of the top Euro models, Sophie, Eve, Stracey, Sandra Shine, etc..
- Despite not having a lot of models overall, most of the models they do have, have 5-10 photo sets, 4-8 videos
- Some of the picture sets have 200 or more photos in them
Cons: - TBP talks about the video needing improved. I can agree to a point, but the videos are not that bad either. You do just get MPEG option, in small files or one large one
- Update frequency is questionable, I only see two photo updates in June so far and May also only had 2. I do see 3 video updates for June though.
Bottom Line: I would think this site could be great for someone like me who had never been on it. My favorite model, Eve Angel has 8 photoshoots and 6 videos. One of the photoshoots is one that I have seen several times on TGP boards, and had wanted with her in a blue halter type tight shirt and black workout shorts.

I'm not that impressed with the videos, but I have seen worse. In full screen mode they are a little blurry, but it isn't too bad. The photo sets are impressive, most having around 200 photos in each. I noticed Drooler's comment, and I do agree that it is pretty bad though, they have a 4000 option on the pics, but the pictures aren't half that big.

I still can't find anything overly bad about the site, but again, anytime you join a site for the first time, that has 100% exclusive content, everything will be new. I knocked a few points off for that since I wouldn't think joining again won't happen for probably at least 6 months, maybe longer. The site uses the rating system that Babelicious uses. You can also leave comments on each set. Pretty much all of the models are top level, there may be one or two that aren't, but I am very happy with the selection. It was also nice to see that the videos I have watched do not have background music in them, just moaning and those other lovely sounds.

I would recommend a one month membership to anyone who likes Euro girls. As the content they have is great. Anything beyond a month may be pushing it until they update more.

06-17-07  06:30pm

Replies (2)
Review
471
Visit Zoliboy

Zoliboy
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Another high quality site for the Euro fans
- Over 1,000 video clips, many upwards of 45 minutes long.
- Zoliboy seems to at least be nice to the models and makes most laugh, giggle and smile. Seems like a really normal guy.
- Several fetishes are covered, peeing, fisting, big toys, etc..
- The interview part where he gets to know the models is at least interesting instead of, "do you like sex?" gives the site a real feel.
Cons: - Video quality isn't that great
- Vidcaps instead of pictures, which you see during the videos
- Needs some new work on the navigation, just seems a little dated.
Bottom Line: I join Zoli once a year with a PixandVideo combo. The first thing that I want to say is that this is not a 100% all sex site. Zoli must be a kink lover and has lots of peeing clips, something that I am not into. But, he also has showers and some really sexy masturbation videos. I don't know if because he talks to the girls with respect, maybe it turns them on more to play with themselves in front of him. He may have the best Eve Angel masturbation video that I have seen. As Eve giggles when he is trying to help her with English, "I'm a horny little slut" ok, that isn't respectful but he said it while laughing, which made her laugh. Good stuff.

He also has some where he takes the model to a mall, he videotapes clothes shopping. It is funny to watch the workers in the store start watching him closely when he walks in with a video camera. He makes little snide remarks that are often comedy club level funny. He then sneaks into the dressing room with the model while she tries on the clothes. He might as well be your friend, he says, "Check this out guys!" the models usually blush.

I really enjoy the site, but even with daily updates, once you have been there a few times there just isn't that much to keep you around for more than a month at a time. I personally like the interview first 10 minutes of the videos, they are outside walking around, eating ice cream, it shows the normal side of the models. It is a fun, entertaining site. I recommend it, especially as a combo!

06-03-07  03:32pm

Replies (0)
Review
472
Visit Only 3X

Only 3X
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good amount of hardcore and all content is high quality.
- 100% exclusive, great for collectors of the models they have (80 or so).
Cons: - Really, it doesn't seem to have a lot of content on it. Though there are near 500 videos
- Pic sets couldn't be full sets, one had 6 pics in it
- As with most sites, especially newer ones, there are some navigation problems
Bottom Line: I had read where another member on PU had problems with the price being higher than expected. I almost ended up in the same group with him. When you register, it gives you the price options. I clicked $19.99, when I clicked "join" it just reloaded the same page. I hadn't typed in any payment information. I noticed that the price option was now marked, "$89.99 for multi-month access". I closed the browser, was using Firefox and opened Internet Explorer 7, this time when I clicked the $19.99 it went straight to CCbill and let me join.

So be careful when joining. Those price buttons reset themselves when using Firefox, not for sure about Opera. I had a similar problem on one of the DVD sites with Firefox not working right with it.

The site itself is very good. It looks like a startup company similar to the 21st Sextury sites that is just getting going. I may be wrong on that though. There are around 80 models and most have 4-5 videos each. The content is high quality and it is exclusive, so if you collect any of the Euro models, it is worth a one month pass. It also some pretty great/realistic hardcore on it. Which is my biggest problem with b/g hardcore, most of it looks way beyond staged. On only3x it looks more believable though.

They do have Eve Angel for you collectors of one of the most perfect natural women in the world. I like it so far, have been a member for 2 weeks. I recommened it, especially for Euro fans. Otherwise, it needs more models.

04-30-07  08:20pm

Replies (1)
Review
473
Visit My Naughty Album

My Naughty Album
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - A site that is about women being photographed only to realize it’s turning them on, so they have sex with the photographer.
- Decent sized site for what is a niche, I can’t say I’ve seen before. It has 70 scenes.
- Video downloads are from mobile up to 1080.
- The female models are a major selling point on this site.
- Download speeds are above average but not by much (about 60-70% of my max)
- Navigation and tags are good and seem accurate.
Cons: - It’s not updating.
- Considering the basis of the scenes, you would think they would put some focus on photos, but they don’t. The zips have 4-6 pictures in them.
- 100 scene download limit per month.
Bottom Line: It’s not often I find a niche I haven’t seen before but this one is one I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen before. The photographer is taking photos and complimenting the female. She gets turned-on and turn the porn music on there’s a porn scene about to happen. They do a good job of making it believable. I’m not for sure who the fantasy would appeal to except photographers. I know from my own experience, if you take enough pictures of a woman and compliment her that it leads to more. They’re giving you the blueprint for how to score.

The thing I have noticed with this network is the quality of the models. They have a model on this site that is one of my favorites, but I hardly ever see scenes with her in them. Her name is Carol Marf. Besides her, I don’t think they have a bad model. Every model they have is attractive. They have the ones that stand out like Carol Marf. That’s purely subjective but with my past in porn collecting, having a model I like is a big deal, that’s going to get me to join at least once. The content is exclusive. The other thing about this network is that 100 scenes download limit, but I don’t even find that restricting. I’m at the point where I download maybe 20-50 scenes maximum from most sites. I’m kind of giving you a tip when I say the streaming doesn’t count against the download limit. I won’t say anything else about that.

The download quality of the videos is fairly standard with 240, 480, 720 and 1080. The photos are a disappointment. As unique as I think the setup for these scenes is, it’s not played out enough or fleshed out enough. It goes like this: Taking pictures, she’s getting turned on, she’s naked, sex starts. There’s a lot more they could do with this niche. I know a couple of photographers from my years of porn collecting. Don’t know if he did some work for this site, Fred the photographer, he was known from Teen Dreams and Teen Models which was his site. He never gave me a story about a model getting that turned on that she put out to him. That’s where I think they could make this niche better. Have it where the female is so turned on she’s seducing the poor photographer. This is more like he’s a porn star and she’s a porn star and we stuck a story in there to make it seem original.

The site is not big with 70 scenes but this is a point I made a long time ago along with Porn User legend Denner, the models are still the most important part and that’s what this site has going for it. If we go deep enough into our imaginations, we can imagine the photographer is just another guy like us and he’s getting lucky with the pretty model. Maybe.

I don’t know if the network itself is nearing a complete shutdown. If so, some of this content is worth grabbing. They had some really good ideas when this network launched. I remember scoring the network up in the 90s when I first joined it. It’s possible they tried to do too much. I would recommend joining it to just get the scenes that interest you or if you’re a collector, they have several collectible models with exclusive scenes.

12-06-21  05:49pm

Replies (0)
Review
474
Visit Naughty Bookworms

Naughty Bookworms
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Geeky, nerdy, librarian, teacher-type porn.
- Very large site with 556 scenes on it.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Nearly 500 models.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Remastered updates are bringing life to some of their oldest and best scenes.
Cons: - The new updates stopped in 2017 but they have released remastered scenes since then.
- They don’t do the best job of meeting the niche.
- The downside of being a site that’s been around a long time. The oldest scenes are far below the newer scenes in technical quality.
Bottom Line: I think this is one of the most common niches in porn. They do switch it up some. It’s not always an older male teacher with a younger female student. They have some older female teachers with younger guys. There are some scenes that are supposed to be two bookworks/nerds and they could both be older or they both could be younger. The part that doesn’t change much is the scenes are filmed in a classroom setting.

As much as I like the remasters they can make a porn collector like me get over-excited like seeing a “new” update from Gracie Glam, then realizing it’s a remastered version of her 2005 scene. I thought, “She hasn’t aged a bit”.

The production values on this site could be higher than they are. Nearly every scene features sex on the teacher’s desk. They at least do have multiple classroom sets so it doesn’t look like every scene is filmed in the same classroom. The stories in the scenes are mostly the same. Student does something bad, stays after class, the teacher spanks her then bends her across his desk. I do think there is a positive to this site. The outfits. The attitudes. The women usually have on something like a schoolgirl outfit and their attitudes vary between bratty to more horny than the teacher. It’s a lot like the site Innocent High except the women on this site don’t wear the same outfit like they do on Innocent High.

They have 556 scenes with all scenes between 2014-2017 having a 4K download option along with 1080p and 720p. The pictures could be better quality and some don’t even have a zip download option. It’s an older site but in this day and age of cookie-cutter porn, it’s sometimes better to go back and find good old scenes, especially when they’re remastered to 1080p or 720p quality.

For this genre, it’s a good site and I think most fans of the genre would be happy with it. There are some big name models on here too. One of the new remasters is the Alexis Texas scene and Amia Miley has a very good scene on this site. The remasters are a selling point to me since they are remastering their best and most popular scenes first. Good site on an even better network.

11-04-20  07:37am

Replies (0)
Review
475
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - One of my most highly rated networks on a consistent basis, not anymore.
- 53 sites unless some of those are just samples, Lil' Humpers shows up in my membership but only has 6 scenes on it.
- Some of the best mainstream porn on the internet.
- One of the top networks when it comes to diversity in their models, white, Asian, Latina, black, mixed, even transsexuals.
- Good navigation, you skip from site to site without having to sign in and their search engine shows all of the model's content, so if you find a model you like on one of their sites, you click her name and you'll see her other content.
- Almost always can be joined for under $10.
- Updates twice a day across the network.
- 8,399 models as of 1/8/2020.
Cons: - You have to pay for downloads and the downloads cost more than the membership. Membership was $9.95, downloads are $14.95. It's not terrible to pay $25 for a site but it's a change that I don't like and that's a subjective opinion. I joined this site for years and had downloads included in the price. I think I paid $17.95 back then. Why not just offer the download package on the join screen?
- Their billing processor is the most frustrating biller I have dealt with. They try to offer you "discounts" that are more expensive than what you're paying for it. It used to be an instant, automated cancellation system.
- I will be taking on the long, frustrating task of adding up how many of their sites still update. Here's the number 9 of 53 sites are updating.
Bottom Line: Reality Kings, for me, was once the best of the American networks. They had a huge amount of diversity in their models. They had creative, even fun sites (Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs), a whole collection of Latina sites, several Asian sites, black girl sites, now it looks like they've turned to RK Prime to release most of their new content on and it looks just like the porn on every other porn site.

I reviewed Brazzers not too long ago and was similarly harsh on it even though at that time, Brazzers had downloads including in their membership, I've heard they are now charging for downloads too.

I paid for a month of downloads at Reality Kings as they had some scenes I wanted to add to my collection but can't say I'll feel the need to do it again. The newer scenes I did download have lost all the fun and sexiness of their old scenes.

Their numbers are very impressive at 8,399 models and over 14,000 scenes but I have a lot of those scenes from 2015 and back. It seems like my favorite sites: 8th St. Latinas, MILF Hunter, Money Talks, CFNM Secret, Happy Tugs, In the VIP and Black Girlfriends, all stopped updating in the 2017-2018 span.

If anyone is curious, without the downloads package you can't even download photos or screencaps. All you can do is stream the videos.

It just feels like this upsell system gets me on the wrong foot. I found a few scenes I really liked but it really feels like this is my last time coming to Reality Kings. I felt the same way about Brazzers even with downloads included.

I'm sure there is a market for streaming only porn but I'm not part of it.

I won't go completely against it and say no one should join it. I think if you're new to it and don't mind paying the $25 price for the membership and downloads it's worth a month or two. There was a time when they shooting some of the best, even most creative porn.

I won't let them off the hook for the bullshit cancellation process. I chatted with an agent for nearly 15 minutes. When I would turn down a new "great offer" he would ask me to hold on. He would be gone for 3-4 minutes at a time. All he had to do was say, "Okay, got you cancelled" and I wouldn't have been happy about having to chat to cancel but at least would have appreciated them not making it a hassle.

Instead, I'm left with 15-20 new, good scenes that cost $25 and a lot of frustration and hassle. Hopefully, they will one day at least consider making the downloads an option for when you're joining and put in an automated cancellation system. There, talked myself into it. I won't be back until those things get fixed. The score isn't terrible because I think it still has value especially to a newer user, it would be about 10 points lower for me.

01-07-20  09:52pm

Replies (2)

Shown : 451-475 of 2066 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.57 seconds.