Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My once favorite ATK site, things have changed.
- Updates with 6 photo sets per week, no videos have been added since 2016.
- The photo sets are still as great as they ever were with around 150 photos per set, full teasing, full nudity, full spreading and close-ups. You also still get the old videos that are 1080p, they just aren't adding new ones.
- Good download speeds (80% my max)
- Some of the interview videos on Premium are some of the most realistic, less contrived as I've seen in porn interviews. If you have a favorite or favorites be sure to watch their interviews.
- A mixture of the different ATK sites, Exotics will be here, Petites and Hairy.
Cons:
- There's a dead horse somewhere and I keep beating it. Navigation is poor and tries to search ATK Galleria.
- What happened to the videos after 2016? I remember seeing something once about they had lost some of their content but there's not any new ones being added either.
- Why only one photo set per day?
Bottom Line:
ATK Premium was once a top 5 or top 10 site for me. That was back in the good ol' days of porn when Eve Angel resided as the queen of European porn. I once got in a heated discussion with one of the old ATK webmasters here on PU over their interview video with Eve where they made her actually cry by imposing on Hungarian traditions. I'm pretty sure one of the newer webmasters removed the video but they did try to make those interviews very real and very candid without falling into the same formula every site used for interviews.
One of my favorite Eve Angel videos came from here as she was masturbating in a bathroom, in an ATK office and just a room over they were doing construction/remodeling. Eve, the forever pro, kept looking around with each ladder crash but never lost her masturbating rhythm. If anything, it seemed to arouse her as the door was open and being filmed from the hall.
What you have now is a site that is just new photo sets of their most popular models. Their photography skill shows in these sets. It's an old discussion about how the best photographers can make a photo set more arousing than a video. ATK Premium could do that and while I don't know a lot of these newer models there's still some new favorites as mentioned in other reviews. Vina Sky has only 2 photo sets here but they are some of her most explicit photos.
You won't find many models that are unattractive here. Some might even come across as too attractive and made up for a site that keeps an amateur edge to it.
The numbers are still impressive with over 10,000 photo sets and 3,500 videos.
I once compared this site to being ATK's Greatest Hits compilation of their sites and still feel that way. They have top models from all their sites so you get a sample of exotic models, hairy models, petite models and amateur models. The ATK Network might hurt ATK Premium since it gives you a view of all their different content.
While the photos are 3000x2000 like the other ATK sites, I believe they use better settings here and it produces some of the best photos I've ever seen.
I wanted to cover the ATK sites since I was pretty harsh on their network. The network itself still has major navigation problems since you just switch from one site to the other and each site has navigation problems but they have added ATK Girlfriends to the network and I recently scored it very high. Just my luck, it wasn't in the network when I joined it but it is letting me sign in with a network membership now. If that network ever gets a hub page that connects all their sites I think they'll be one of the top networks on the internet. As it is, you can bounce from ATK site to ATK site and collect your favorite models. Many of which, with all sites combined, have over 100 photo sets and 30-50 videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A porn history lesson within a hardcore porn site. One of the all-time greats, Marc Dorcel, well into his 80s and still going (producing).
- Large site that features videos from different series (listed as categories, will list them in Bottom Line).
- Dorcel has been bringing in the biggest names in modeling for decades and not just European models, there are models from 25 different countries.
- Technical quality is about as good as you will find.
- Solo, lesbian, male/female, threesomes, orgies and I believe his orgy scenes are the best.
- Okay download speeds (about 65% of my max)
Cons:
- The site can be confusing. Aaliyah Love is listed as having 5 videos. You click on her, she has 1.
- Continuing on the confusion, categories takes you to nothing more than the different DVDs/scenes, no tags, nothing to tell you what happens in the scene.
- Continuing on the confusion, very limited photos, it's Marc Dorcel! Where are the photos? The photos that are available are screen captures and have 10-20 selected stills per set.
Bottom Line:
It's hard to believe but Marc Dorcel is in his 80s and is still producing porn. I first saw his DVDs on Private Video years ago. Probably the best compliment I can give him is he takes something really raunchy and makes it look classy. Like 3 men, 5 women having an orgy in what looks like a theater for the most wealthy people to attend plays at.
The technical quality of the videos includes 4K on newer videos, there's some with 3D, 1080p is falsely claimed on vintage scenes but overall, the video quality is very high.
The strength of Dorcel's work might be its weakness. There are vintage scenes here from the 90's, one with a young Rocco Siffredi with Carolyn Monroe, it shows a 1080p version. I downloaded it, the specs in VLC says 1440x1080. I'm thinking the non-existence of widescreen televisions and monitors back then gives the 1440x1080 resolution instead of 1920x1080 but I can tell you it is not 1080p. It looks blurry, upscaled and at best, looks like a 640x480 resolution scene stretched.
That's what I mean by strength being the weakness. That Rocco and Carolyn scene is a great scene but until someone figures out how to upscale a 480p video, I wouldn't mess with it. I can always resize my VLC player or Windows Media Classic player to stretch it some. Instead, you get scenes that are stretched and there's no way to ... unstretch them.
Dorcel has also had sites as far back as the early 2000s. The content on Dorcel Club is a blend of it and even his content from the pre-internet days.
It also has some or most of his newest DVDs. His content is so far spread out it's hard to know if there are other newer DVDs that aren't here.
A key word/acronym in this review is DVD. This is a DVD site. It's why I'm going to list the different series and how many scenes each has. Models without pictures is also a problem and shows this is a DVD site.
Here are the series with their number of scenes in parenthesis:
40th Anniversary (49), One Night in Paris (11), Luxure (62), 40 Years Old (48), Pornochic (156), Escort Deluxe (28), Desire of Submission (27), Russian Institute (113), Fuck VIP (46), Dorcel Airlines (20), Dorcel Girls (99), Cult Movies (93), Club Xtreme (21), Secretary (74), Vintage (74), Nurses (37), French Maids (52), Welcome to Jail (11), For Couples (34), Orgy (119), Making of (94), Outdoor Sex (24), Lesbian (92), Big Boobs (63), MILF (84), Students (116), Fantasies (308), Family Secrets (20), Story of (37), Dorcel Prestige (129) and Anal (50).
What I focused on was the 119 orgy scenes. Something you will notice is the names started becoming more generic and more like niches, for example 50 Anal scenes. I would estimate half of the scenes on here have anal in them. It's like someone got lazy and just started using generic names like anal, public sex and big boobs.
I just think this could all be put together a lot better than it is. If I had to make a direct comparison, I would compare Dorcel's style to a blend of Viv Thomas and DDF. The content is good but the site itself is questionable.
There is a new scene added every 2-3 days and the models are like a who's who list of models but you will run into the problem where it lists a model as having X amount of videos, only to find out she only has Y amount.
It's a worth a join for the orgy scenes or if you're a collector of certain models. Just be prepared to go through some hassles of scrolling and trying to find what you're looking for.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best-known pornsites in the world.
- If she's an American pornstar she most likely has a scene here.
- They have some sites/themes they really excel at.
- Nearly 2,000 models and nearly 10,000 scenes.
- Allows downloads unlike some of the company's (Mind Geek) other sites that require extra payment for downloads.
- Download speeds are good (75-80% of my max)
- Scenes come with video and photo sets.
Cons:
- It seems they done away with all scenes prior to 2009. You can see them but you can't stream or download them.
- Lists 33 sites in your membership, 9 of those stopped updating before 2009, you can't download or view any of the content on those sites.
- Seven more of the sites haven't updated in 2 years.
Bottom Line:
(Edit: 9/16/2019 after a member tip told me to try the videos from 2009 before on my cellphone, it is true, those old videos that can't be viewed or even seen on my PC, can be seen on my cellphone. It's not a big adjustment since I don't and won't use my cellphone for porn, but I will add 3 points to the score since it is at least still possible to see those scenes ... on your cellphone. I know a few members here don't have cellphones.)
Brazzers is a tale of two sites. Nearly half of their sites are not updating or do not have anyway to access the content on them.
The content they do have is good. They have relatively high productions values considering they are a budget-level network. I never have the problems with signing up or canceling that other members have. You just make sure to select no on the signup screen. It asks if you want to upgrade. They make the wording sound like selecting no will cancel your attempt to join their site. When you go to cancel you go to their Biller's website ProBiller and look around. There are options to cancel via chat, via phone call, via email, but if you look you will an online cancellation form that cancels it immediately.
It could and should be better and easier but I've seen worse.
The big con is the missing older content. You can open the old scenes (2009 and before) but you can't stream them or download them (8 sites). You then have 7 other sites that haven't updated since 2016. Even the updating sites seem to follow no schedule. One of my favorite sites on here is Moms In Control. It has had an update in September, one in August, two in May, one in March and the one before the March update goes all the way back to November 2018.
Despite these sites that aren't updating or can't be downloaded from, they still release 2 new scenes a day.
Doctor's Adventures and Big Tits at School are my two favorite sites on Brazzers and both of those are still updating with decent frequency. Big Tits at School is averaging one scene per month and Doctor's Adventures averages nearly 2 scenes per month. I join once a year and download the scenes from those sites, spend maybe a day looking at new models to see if there are any other scenes I might want and that's usually the extent of the time I spend on Brazzers.
They do offer good quality on their videos from 480p up to 1080p and their photo sets are real photo sets and not just screencaps. It's just there's a lot of extra nonsense going on. Each time you sign in, it offers you multiple sites they own as upgrades. You have to click "take me to Brazzers". On Brazzers main page they have upsells for their other sites all across the top of the page. You really don't know what all you have access to. I noticed their channel add-ons, which you can't even see a preview for are $59.95 each. Who's going to pay $59.95 for the Latina Channel?
It's the sad part about Brazzers. They can and have made some very good porn over the years but it just feels like they're not trying anymore and hoping for members to click on an add-on. I could explain that better. It's like the newer content is lesser quality than it used to be so maybe they're thinking you will add-on one of those channels or their other sites to get higher quality content. If you are new to Brazzers you can add 5-10 points to my score but for anyone that's been here much you're going to see a lot of your favorite sites no longer updating or a lot of your favorite older content no longer available to download. They had a lesbian scene between Lana Lopez and Ella Milano, believe it was on Hot and Mean, if you go to Lana's model page there are comments asking where the scene with Ella is.
I know they can do a lot better than they are doing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site about fit women in fitness clothes, including exercising, then having sex.
- My membership includes full access to Sexy Hub network and a MILF channel which I've not found yet.
- Content is 100% exclusive and downloads are allowed, I was concerned it would be one of those sites that asked for more money for downloads but it allows downloads up to 1080p.
- Picture sets with each scene and are downloadable.
- If you just stay on this site, the navigation is simple and easy but once you venture out the Sexy Hub network things get a little confusing.
- I think this niche is underrated. I guess it depends on the viewers geographical area but I see women wearing leggings, athletic clothes, everyday.
- One that might slip by, if it has a clothing niche, the models don't start nude.
- Updates like clockwork, once a week with a video and photo set, site still only has 104 scenes on it as of 5/1/2018.
- Models are very attractive.
Cons:
- Hello ads. When you first login it tries to upsell you a deal, then each time you return to the homepage an ad pops up for 15,000 scenes for $1. Computer programmers have learned how to make the ads "not really" pop-ups so the pop-up blocker won't catch it.
- There's a certain level of cookie-cutter here.
- DL speeds are inconsistent for me. One downloaded at 14mbps, then 3mbps, then 8mbps, then 1mbps. I rarely run into a DL speed problem, so I will see if it straightens up over the next few weeks.
- MBI/Probiller, whether unfair to list them as a con is debatable but I find their canceling process to be annoying (call, email or chat)and it has to be done 3 days before the end of your membership.
Bottom Line:
I had considered joining this site quite a few times in the past. I knew it's a smaller site and knew it's a specific niche but this is one of my favorite niches. I didn't know until I joined that it comes with access to the Sexy Hub network which has some good sites on it too.
My biggest concern was that the videos required further payment to download but they don't. Each video has 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. The 1080p have 6000 bitrate and the 720p have close to 3000 bitrate. The videos are very good technical quality and because of the nature of the content you'll see a lot of brightly colored clothes and backdrops.
I don't know what's going on with the download speed but do think it's just a glitch, possibly on my side, I just downloaded another scene to see how the speed is doing and it's up to 14mbps. That's 80-90% of my max so I'll keep an eye on it to see if the inconsistency returns.
What you're getting here is content of a workout room, gym, fitness club. There are scenes with men and women, usually the typical "gym" scene of the guy training the woman then he lets his hand slide across her butt and then it becomes normal porn, again. I find it fun and kind of humorous to try and guess when the sexual grab happens. You also have lesbian scenes and some of these do try to be more aggressive/dominant but overall it's mostly tame.
It's my way of saying the biggest reason you should join this site is if you're like me and like seeing pretty, fit, young women in their exercise clothes before getting nude. The themes of the scenes don't change much. I haven't watched every scene but I keep wondering if I'm going to find one of a mixed group, maybe like a coed yoga class.
Then ... I saw a model who made me think of a young Eve Angel, her name is Vanessa Decker. They have 7 scenes with her in them and that helped the score a little. The models, from what I can tell, are mostly European which did surprise me and I haven't been a member of a European porn site in awhile, so they're all new to me.
I keep going back to the feeling that they're missing something with the lack of group scenes. One of the scenes, for example, has 8 women at the beginning. They are all dressed very skimpy and exercising in the class/group style. After a few minutes the "class" ends and 5 of the women disappear. Three stay and have sex. Even if those 5 just stayed around and watched, maybe masturbated, I think those type of scenes would be a major boost to this site.
The navigation on Fitness Rooms only is as basic and easy as possible to use. There are 5 pages of scenes, scroll through each page to get each scene. Picture tab is above the stream window. The pictures are very good but it's hard to tell if these are just screencaps from the video. It does look that way because the males are in the photos. If you start using the Sexy Hub network, you have to sign in again and they have quite a bit more content so it becomes harder to navigate. I expect in a few years, a lot of these smaller, newer networks will start combining all their niche sites with their networks.
There are 104 scenes, 136 models (since there are multiple models in many of the scenes) and I could sit here and name off favorites but nearly all 136 would be listed. In terms of model attractiveness, this site reminds me of the early to mid-2000s European boom of models. Add tight exercise clothes and you have a winner for me but it is admittedly, a less-enthusiastic winner than usual. It feels like they have a time limit they're trying to stay within in each video.
Still, I would recommend it for those who like pretty, fit, younger (18-24) models in tight clothes, attempting to convince you they are only there to exercise. I'll also note that when I was joining and saw the offer for an included membership to Sexy Hub that I looked at Sexy Hub and it offers the same deal by adding Fitness Rooms to their membership.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Still a unique site that has seen its better days.
- Women wrestling. Stripping each other's clothes off. Force-groping each other. Fingering each other for "points".
- If you're a Dragon Lily or Isis Love fan, then that's a major pro for this site as there's lots of content of them.
- Kink quality and overall experience, lots of scrolling, slightly hidden tricks (see comment didn't fit in BL), access to the Kink network and its near 50 sites.
- This should have been my top pro. The live content. It blows away the studio content. See cons.
- Zipped pictures are back, 1200 long end, but at least they're back.
- More content than you'd believe. As of 12/24/2017: 975 scenes.
- Good download speeds, about 75% of my max.
- Navigation is a con if you're new. If you've been here awhile it's not bad at all.
- Site updates once a week, network updates 3 times a day.
Cons:
- That live content hasn't been added in a long time. To the best I can tell, the last live "match" was in August 2016. If I shared my 10 favorite scenes from this site all 10 would be live matches. I'll go more into those in the BL.
- As is the norm with Kink, the highest quality videos are 720p, which I prefer anyway, but could be a turn-off for others. Should mention that most of their scenes are in the hour or longer range, so anything over 720p is going to be a huge file.
- They're having a hard time replacing old favorites on Ultimate Surrender.
Bottom Line:
I first heard of or saw Ultimate Surrender content on an old TGP site back over a decade ago. It looked interesting. I have a fairly-long background in martial arts, even dating back to before anyone had heard of UFC. The premise of the site, in the old days, was unplanned, unscripted, "wrestling" matches. Think more like MMA or Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu or in even more specific terms -- grappling.
I didn't have the best experience talking to one of their producers back in the mid-2000s. I found it insulting to claim unscripted. It's obvious, we're going to compare this to pro wrestling, which doesn't even try to claim unscripted. I felt it showed dishonesty and in turn, I don't do business with dishonest companies.
To understand my frustration with it, I know one of the models, went to high school with her in Los Angeles. She's one of the sweetest, most-artsy, least-athletic women I've ever known. And for most of her match, she dominated her opponent. There is a point with a site like this that fantasy has to go away or else it's not that interesting for 2/3 of each scene.
Kink started growing and while they still threw out the word "unscripted", they obviously followed the lead of professional wrestling and developed "heels" and "babyfaces". Dragon Lily played a major role as a heel. A fairly well-trained grappler with a great traditional female build and she would wipe out her opponents. Then they'd find someone who would come in and beat Dragon Lily. They even expanded the Dragon Lily streak of dominance by having her dominate men. I personally would be up for that role.
Which is important to my review. I like dominant women. I don't care if it's scripted either. They later brought in Isis Love, who was as good maybe better than Dragon Lily at the top "bad girl" role.
They then decided to try something new. The matches were becoming stale. All were held in the same room of the Kink Dungeon or whatever it's called. Two women usually grunting (not sexually), skin slapping in a completely quiet room.
They brought in a live crowd. Completely changed the way these scenes are viewed. And these weren't crowds of other porn stars. There's older women, older men, middle-aged people, look like random people off the street and they all watch and respond as these women grapple and try to grope each other. They could have produced one live scene a month and I would have loved it. Even with no other updates! Just 1 live one a month, but they only did the live scenes for a short period of time.
The numbers of this site aren't much to talk about. They're impressive: Nearly 1,000 scenes and all roughly lasting 45 minutes or so. The 720p videos, for whatever reason, Kink does a great job at filming, look crisp. But that's really all there is to talk about the site except the concepts and gimmicks (live).
To show the continuity they formed with certain models: Dragon Lily's first Ultimate Surrender match was posted on August 10, 2004. She stayed active in the matches through April 1, 2014 and made a one-time comeback in 2015.
To a lesser extent:
Isis Love's first match was posted on February 8, 2005 and her last match was posted on September 3, 2013.
My favorite scene was Isis' return. She had been away for awhile. It's a live scene. She's in the crowd as a spectator and I didn't even realize it was her at first. She starts squeezing her thighs together as she's watching the women wrestling. She ends up being involved as one of the wrestlers is made to flirt/tease her. This drops the sexual action right into the middle of the crowd. It was like Kink's Public Disgrace site except it was to most viewers, a non-porn star spreading her legs in front of strangers. One of my all-time favorite scenes from any site.
Which explains the 83. No live scenes in over a year and those live scenes, while "live" weren't like the live scenes from I think 2011-2014, the newer live scenes are back in the same dull room just with a row of people sitting off the side of the wrestling mat. The older live scenes were much higher energy and the crowds reactions were big pluses.
And the 83 is because the newer models just aren't as believable. It's like watching a lesbian scene that has 30 minutes of fluff at the beginning. I hate using wrestling terms, but there's no "heat", meaning, the competition, even scripted, is no longer there. Daisy Ducati does a good job in her matches, but she seems to be about getting off as much as getting the other woman off. Which is a selling point of a site like this. Isis, Dragon Lily, they would finger, strap-on the woman they beat and stop when she started to orgasm.
It's still worth the price since you can still download all those older scenes, including all the live ones, but currently, it updates once a week and the updates are interchangeable. Having been about as negative as I'll be in a review, I still will say the Kink Network is the best deal in porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a network that's not really a network that has one of the internet's top handjob sites in it.
- Includes 3 sites, Mano Job, The Dick Suckers (really, people?) and Mr POV. At least we know they're not using their creative juices for site names. There's also bonus scenes from Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
- Download speeds are good, 75% of my max.
- Most scenes include pictures and they are downloadable. There's also various options on the videos including "bra busting" clip and "cumshot only".
- Navigation is excellent. Well, kind of, it will make more sense as you read through.
- Mano Job has been around for 10+ years. It was the first handjob site I saw that used the "pussy tease", a very important part for me.
- Rocketgate as biller, I've had no problems with them, but do get annoyed by them remembering me and trying to use my sign-up information from 2012. Cards expire!
- No real ads, some live cams from within the site, no cross-sales.
Cons:
- I'm going to get this one out of the way. Handjob porn isn't for everyone and I'll explain in the BL what it is that I like about it and even for me, it gets very repetitive.
- The damning one, though it's not hurting my score since there's still a lot of content here. They're recycling content and my guess is they have been for awhile. I think some of it might be remastered when they recycle it, but one of the newest scenes is of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. There will be more in the bottom line.
- Supposed download limit, I tested it as good as I could, downloaded 76 GB in 7 hours, didn't hit a limit, so this isn't so much a con as it is a reminded that they do say they have a download limit.
Bottom Line:
Why would I call a network, a network that's not really a network? Because I was a member of Mano Job way back in 2010 and it included The Dick Suckers and Mr. POV. Finishes the Job is nothing more than a hub that brings all the content of those three sites together. It did wonders for the navigation, but this is pretty much the same thing as joining Mano Job and getting the other two sites with it. I don't know, maybe that's a little questionable since Finishes the Job before signing up looks like another full site to go along with those other three.
What's not questionable is the content count. I was shocked when I first opened the site. They have 31 updates in November 2017, that's more than 1 per day. I hadn't realized Finishes the Job even exists. I was just looking at Mano Job as a join to get some old content I no longer have. This really isn't a negative review as the score shows, but I'm going to show the numbers:
RearAdmiral reviewed this site in 2015 and listed 1,400+ scenes.
Mbaya reviewed this site in 2016 and listed 1,452 scenes.
Xander of TBP reviewed this site in March of 2017 and there was 1,308 scenes.
Here I am in late November 2017, a month that has seen 31 updates in 21 days and the total is 1,266.
Ahem.
Maybe things are a little questionable. I know one scene is recycled, it's one of the newest updates and it's of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. I'm guessing these sites are also owned by the people who own Fucked Hard 18 and maybe even Amateur Allure too. There's a phantom site Finishes the Job and 200 less scenes than 2015, but I still think it's a very good site.
The navigation is very simple. They've combined the content into one area. Four rows of four scenes per page, 79 pages. Over on the left toolbar you can pick to just see Mano Job site scenes or any of the other sites, including Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
Handjob porn appealed to me back 10 years ago or so. I saw a handjob scene with Brianna Beach in it. She was already one of the best, most believable porn stars, but that scene pushed her over the top. The enjoyment she showed, the arousal she had, it was bad enough that she was asking for the scene to be a sex scene because she was so turned on. That's what handjob porn offers me. You can watch half or more of these scenes and the models look downright bored. Some even look like they're watching a television off the screen. The other models, they look more aroused and more excited than in even their hardcore scenes.
Mano Job does a good job of this. As mentioned, they were the first to do the pussy tease handjob and it's always fun to watch those because it teases many of the female models more than it is the male. That's very rare in porn. The woman being teased.
It's not going to be possible to say when they started releasing 1080p videos since they're recycling, but I would estimate at least half of the scenes have 1080p, don't hold me to that, but I've went back halfway through the pages and there's still a 1080p option.
That excellent navigation might hurt them even more. It's making it easy to see that they are cram-updating. I remember other sites doing this back a few years ago, they would remove 100 and release them over a month as new.
I still can't help but laugh over the names of the sites, did somebody really say, "The Dick Suckers"? Mano Job is the "star" here and the main draw. There's been mixed reports on the DL limit, Xander mentions in his TBP review that there's no DL Limit, but it does show up in their TOS, it just isn't active from the best I can tell.
Look at this as an archive site. The content is good, even if it's repetitive. Good quality, excellent navigation, little to no ads, no cross sales, it's hard to be too hard on them as being dishonest when they're not taking advantage of multiple cross sales and dozens of ads. If I was going to offer advice it would be to put all the content back on it and just let the content sell itself. Nearly all handjob and CFNM sites have gone under.
And that's how I will recommend it, for those who like handjob content or POV content, I don't particularly care for Mr POV or The Dick Suckers, but the content is typical on those sites. Even though I would recommend it to those who like handjob content, I will only do so on a one-month basis. I won't be back after this month. Which I think is sort of a strength for an archive site. You can get everything you want in a month and know there's no more new content coming out. Last, as far as I can tell, this is exclusive content, but I want to mention again the bonus site content, specifically Fucked Hard 18, the blue room that's used in nearly every Fucked Hard 18 scene is also used occasionally on Mano Job.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A somewhat hectic, completely perverse site that I've yet to figure out, which at least means it's unique.
- Update schedule is erratic, but they still have a fair amount of updates. So far in September there's only been two updates, in August there were 3 updates and July had 5, so there's no strict schedule, but there's still updates.
- Is part of the Kink Network and stands out for being not nearly as genre-specific as the other Kink sites.
- I would think this appeals to fans of BDSM, role-playing, bondage and voyeurism.
- Fast download speeds, around 90% of my max.
- More amateur interaction than any site I've seen. Will explain below.
- There's a story in most of the scenes and some of the models return to continue their previous stories. It's really not that great, but at least they're trying.
- Navigation is iffy, but once inside The Upper Floor site and away from the network, it's a lot easier to use.
Cons:
- I want to put this first because most of the TBP reviews list these sites, including this one, as having picture sets for downloads. There's no picture sets whatsoever. Not for browsing or downloading.
- These Kink sites are easy to nitpick since they usually are repetitive (by nature of staying true to their genre), but The Upper Floor is different. It's like a mixture of Sex and Submission with the live aspect they've used on several of their sites which includes a live audience, mixed with a renaissance fair that provides sexual stimulants to their guests. It's in the cons because I don't get it. Maybe it's just too far-reaching for me? It's not a big negative, but when you become used to things being perfectly clear then you get a site that you can't even figure out the basis for it becomes a con.
Bottom Line:
The Upper Floor is my least-liked site on the Kink network (boy/girl content).
One of its biggest strengths is most of the people in the scenes are in costumes or if you want to say, non-typical everyday clothes. It's a strength since I either can't tell the amateurs in the audience from the pros in the action. This creates the closest I've seen to a believable public orgy. I could see a bunch of hippies in San Francisco dressing up like miscast medieval characters, getting tipsy, then getting naked and having an orgy. There are believable crowd interactions in the scenes. Many of the women that end up touching a female model or even fingering the model look like regular, everyday receptionists. I'll continue to tap into my imagination and believe their boring daily lives are repressing them sexually. They go see one of these live sex shows on The Upper Floor and lose all their inhibitions.
That's also the problem with the site. I like structure, order and discipline. Hectic is a four-letter word to me. It's kind of like watching a television series by starting with season 4, episode 7 and trying to figure out why you're seeing what you're seeing. You'll also see this with the update schedule. There's no pattern, no "X amount of updates per month/week/day".
The action on this site is mostly good, pretty normal for a Kink site.
And this is my take on what the site is about. If I'm wrong, it's okay, it's my take on it. The males are supposed to be these powerful, rich men who the females want to be slaves to. They have these various competitions like "who cums first loses". The loser then faces some kind of punishment. These scenes are usually shot in a room with 10-15 people. But then there will be scenes of one man and one woman in a closed bedroom.
There's lots of anal sex, quite a bit of throat-gagging and as said in the opening of the pros, perversions. The one big plus for me in the action is when those amateur-looking girls step in and start getting involved in the action. The rest of it comes off as typical hardcore porn in 2016 with an extra dose of bondage/clothespins. Maybe it is like a combination of multiple Kink sites into one?
Either way, I don't think it's enough reason to join Kink's network, but the other sites included with the network make it a good join. With The Upper Floor being a fun diversion from their usual sites.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Can be joined through her site and includes 8 bonus sites for $24.95, will explain the better deal, in my opinion, in bottom line.
- 68 photo sets, 1200x798 resolution, all are zipped.
- 109 videos, 720x480, 3000-4000 bitrate
- Mostly solo, plenty of exhibitionism and some girl/girl. There's a catch on the boy/girl content.
- Pamela is a highly charismatic model, she smiles a lot, she giggles, she gets visibly excited when she shows off her body in public, she's playful and as someone who is married to a Latina, Pamela still has the cutest English accent I've heard. Maybe it's the things she says, don't know, but the biggest con is going to be that she no longer is modeling.
- All of her content has stayed on my hard drive since I downloaded it, no deletes and I still go back to it often. Some of these scenes give you a feeling that you're not going to see anything like them again.
- One of the few solo models who doesn't seem to take herself too seriously.
Cons:
- No updates in 2 years
- Would have liked more picture sets and more exhibitionism in her videos.
- The general con theme here is more, more, more.
- The one real con, Pacino did record one hardcore scene of him and Pamela, but it costs $20 to download it in addition to your membership. I don't know if he will ever decide to add that one into the regular content or not.
Bottom Line:
I had said I wasn't going to review this site, but after realizing how much I go back to the content and realizing there are no reviews on it, I thought there should be one since it touches on a niche.
First, Pamela is a very young looking model, from South America. She does have braces, which could be a pro or con for you. She looks really tiny, but once out of her clothes she has a really nice, natural build. Not for sure if she would be a C cup, but pretty close and has the curvy Latina butt. It's hard to tell, but I'm thinking at first Pacino was going to use her more as a barely legal model. Quite a bit of her content plays to her "innocent" look, pigtails, knee-socks, etc...
Her masturbation sets are very believable, she does vaginal and anal masturbation in some. She has several girl/girl videos and like most of Pacino's models, she really seems to enjoy the girl/girl sets, especially the ones with the equally pretty Karen.
What sets Pamela apart though is her exhibitionist side, the innocence gone naughty, she does it as well as any model. A few examples, one set is in a busy bar, it's dim and she flashes her boobs at least 6-7 times with people walking right by. She has a couple of park scenes where she sits on a wall in a skirt and slides her panties over while people walk by, even touches herself in parts and makes comments about, "my pussy is wet". The believability of her sets is as high as any model I've seen. These exhibitionist sets contribute to the credibility of her other sets.
The bad news is that she isn't modeling anymore and hasn't been since 2008.
The good news is, you can join Pacino's Adventures, which is updating and has HD content of Latina amateur models and Pamela's site is included as a bonus site. For someone that has never joined Pacino's Adventures this is a great deal since I personally think Pamela's site alone would be worth joining for one month for the exhibitionism lover.
You can join through Pamela's site for $5 less and it does include the good site La Zona Modelos, and 5-6 other solo model sites Pacino has had that have stopped updating. It's hard to call it a network since all of these sites have been standalone sites at one point or another.
The video specs aren't great, but they are DVD quality and look good enough.
I would recommend it to exhibitionism fans just by itself. It's hard to make an estimate, but I'm saying a minimum of 1/4 of the videos have exhibitionism in them. These stand out because of the look of naughty, trying to be innocent, joy on her face. Some of it seems completely spontaneous too. Very good masturbation model too, the masturbation in the sex toy store is as hot as any solo scene I've seen.
It's probably not for everyone, some of the exhibitionism videos may take 3-4 minutes before you see any skin. Exhibitionism fans probably already expect that, but thought I would mention it. I recommend joining through Pacino's Adventures and getting it as a bonus site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a lesbian site with the added basis of a wrestling match.
- Some scenes have good believability in the wrestling matches, others not so much.
- Will go into the exact numbers in BL, but all the videos are available in 1920x1080.
- Quite a few of the scenes have the "high" quality photo zips available, these are a little over 4000 on the long end.
- If joined through the 21 Sextury site comes as one of 37 sites I received in my first month.
- Good DL speeds and navigation is mostly just scroll until you find the scene(s) want.
- At least seems to be an accurate network site when you click a model's name in a scene, her other scenes across the network come up so if you want to see more of her.
Cons:
- Some of the matchups are more funny than believable like Peaches against anyone or the Sophie Moone vs. Cindy Hope. Sweet Peaches doesn't look like she could ever hurt anything. Same with Sophie. I guess you could call that miscasting.
- Older picture zips are only available in 1280 option. Definitely would like to see those "high" option zips being available in all future sets.
- Update schedule is a little inconsistent. Last match video was on 1-28-11, they were coming once a week when that one came out. In February 2011, site was updated with 6 backstage videos, no match videos.
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by this fight niche. For one, the women are usually athletic built and for two, they're usually wearing skin tight clothes.
Believability in any of the fight sites just isn't that high. It's not that I don't think some of the ladies aren't skilled or trained, it's just that there is poor acting in convincing me that they don't want to kiss the other woman or convincing me that they really don't like being fingered during the match.
On a side, funny, note. One of the scenes, about 1/4 of the way into the movie, the "fighters" seem to decide to just skip the fight part and start kissing! But that is one of the best scenes so I'm not complaining.
On the technical quality side this site is very high. On videos, you have multiple quality options, low, medium, high and ultra. Two formats, wmv and mp4 and all sets on this site, listed as 85 as of today (February 28) are available in 1920x1080.
Pictures are high quality in terms of how they look and I almost thought the "high" quality zips were going to be available on all sets, but they're not. The standard photo zip size of the photos is 1280 long end. The high quality photo zip photos are an impressive 4368 long end.
This is a site, in my opinion, that works well with the 4300 res pictures since a big part of the enjoyment for a viewer of this niche is seeing if we can get a sneak peek up the shorts or a nip slip.
Still not really for sure what's going on with the updates. It looks like the first 10 matches or so didn't have backstage videos released for those and they're releasing them now. If the new match videos don't start showing up in the updates, I will post an update to this review.
Overall, I like this site and its potential. I would like to see the more athletic girls in these matches than the glam girls. There isn't much of a scoring system in these matches or if it is I haven't noticed it. The ones I've watched just have the girls rolling around trying basic head locks, hair pulling and face sitting. Some of the girls are better about faking their disgust with having a woman sitting on their face or their disgust of being kissed by a woman. Works best if you're into the porn that requires a little imagination to believe. Which I don't mind at all.
There is very little to complain about with this site. The backstage videos are okay. If you like a certain model, you will probably like her backstage video. I'm sure there are some things that could be improved with the site like the believability with maybe a scoring system. The only other complaint would be the amount of content. I counted around 60-61 actual match videos so there isn't a ton of content here, but when combined with the network access it's a nice little diversion from the normal lesbian scenes. Recommended to check out as a member of their network. Worth a few laughs too like when one doesn't quite pull the other fighter's bra off, so the fighter pulls her own bra off. I enjoyed it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Generic type network that has its strengths, including several once solo sites that are no longer updating, including Brooke Skye.
- More content than you go through in a month, name the niche, they have it, Tranny, Pregnant, Gangbang, Lesbian, Solo, and so on.
- Navigation is good enough for this much content, things could get very confusing though if they're not careful.
- Average DL speed
- Some of these sites are 100% exclusive
- Says 106 sites and over 4,000 DVDs, see cons
- For everything you get the $30 price is not too bad, though I can't see going back.
- Quality on some sites goes up to HD level, but there is no "standard" size across all of the sites, so it can be hit or miss.
Cons:
- You're going to get the old network trick of advertising 106 sites and 4000 DVDs, when in reality, many of the DVDs are the content that fills the 106 sites.
- Some sites have no photos, others like Brooke Skye have lots of photos, in zips too.
- Your guess is as good as mine if they really are updating. The nature of the network being mostly of ripped DVDs, makes it impossible to know what is new and what isn't.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a very good idea. If you ever joined the Mayor Network, a network of Canadian solo models, they are all here. All of their content from their official sites. These include Brooke Skye, Kat Young, Samantha Gauge, Casey Hays, Lucy Summers, Faith Belle and Shelby Belle. From what I've heard, all of them have stopped modeling, so trying to sell their solo sites as active was no longer working since content was being recycled.
For me, Brooke's content is worth looking into this network. She was one of the most genuine, girl next door models I've seen. She answered reportedly 500-1000 emails per month when her site was at its peak, she would wear things that members wanted to see her in, masturbate where members wanted her to masturbate. She has one of porn's most real smiles, freckles, nice athletic body too. My favorite clip was requested by a member, masturbation in public at night. Brooke is sitting along a beach with people walking behind her on a sidewalk. She laughs and blushes, "I'm so going to orgasm at the wrong time".
The others from Mayor's were hit or miss, at least one was non-nude. You get a small Gaya Patal site if you like her. You also get three of those early 2000s major tease style models. Sweet Dominique, Sweet Juliet and Teen Jasmin, throw in solo model Lil' Sin and Teen Sabrina.
Those sites to my knowledge are 100% exclusive. Some of those go up to HD quality, most of those have zips for their photos and are unaltered since their days as standalone sites.
The rest of the network is mostly niche DVD clips listed as sites. I would say this content at best is 15% exclusive. Most of it is DVD ripped quality, 640 high end, but no photos.
The best way to look at the network is this way. You're getting one pretty popular and highly rated network that was running strong up until 2008 that was of solo Canadian models. You get 5 sites of solo models that were near the top of porn's "innocent" phase in the early 2000s and you get a cookie cutter DVD site with 4,000+ DVDs. Sweet Dominique was the first I ever joined and I vaguely remember a banner on her site back in 2002 claiming, "The internet's most downloaded teen".
Overall, I think the network could have its audience. The Mayor Network was $25 and very popular with members, even here at PU. Those innocent models from the early 2000s are worth re-visiting again. And though the DVDs are non-exclusive, that goes into the old adage of "It is new to me if I haven't seen it". You're sure to find something in those that interests you.
The varying quality hurts a bit, lack of photos on some sites hurt, lack of zips on some of the ones with photos hurt. I think hit or miss is the best way to describe the network. I will say that I won't be back, at best it is a one month join to scour the exclusive sites, none of those exclusive sites are updating though.
My recommendation is if you like the models in the exclusive sites, try it out, if not, don't fool with it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the 35 bonus sites that comes with Zoliboy.com, from the best of my knowledge is 100% exclusive.
- Videos are 720 high end, pictures are available for every scene and come zipped as are screenshots, that also come zipped.
- Decent storylines in some of the videos
- Good DL speed, just above average for me
- Pretty good sized collection, for a bonus site, considering it looks to be all-exclusive, around 85 scenes, videos last around 20 minutes each and photos and screenshots from each.
Cons:
- Mostly interracial, if that's not your thing, probably won't like it.
- Wouldn't have enough content to stand on its own, but makes a nice bonus sites.
- Anytime you bring back older porn stars, you're risking seriously cheesy dialogue and in a good way I guess, some of these have that cheesy dialogue, like, "I see you brought your own tripod"!
Bottom Line:
I wanted to give this a full review for a few reasons. I liked the content. I found it funny, sexy and for the most part enjoyed it much more than I thought I would.
It didn't hurt that there are several models on here that I thought had retired and left the business. This is also why I think this content is exclusive.
One of my favorite stars of the late 90s was the beautiful Cindy Crawford, not the runway model, but the slim, blonde, few slight girly tattoos, almost innocent looking model. Cindy ended up being pretty damn kinky in her hardcore movies as her career progressed. Well, I haven't seen much new from her in several years, but they have a scene on here with her. She has cut her hair real short and it is a brunette/blonde mix. But her face is instantly recognizable. Like most of the other models on this site, she has aged, her butt doesn't look as firm as it did, but she is still pretty sexy.
Others that I knew but hadn't seen lately were Devon Lee, Fiona Cheeks, Joey Valentine, Valentina Lopez, the big booty of Ryen Ryder, you ready for this one? Nina Hartley! The first ever Hustler I looked at had a picture of Nina in it, in her prime, so I was surprised to see her still making hardcore scenes, that magazine had to be in the 80s.
The pictures and screenshots zipped is a nice touch.
If I was just joining this site, it wouldn't be reviewed, simply because there isn't enough content for the price, but when you get it free, it turns out to be a pretty good site. I've seen much worse as bonuses. The best scene to me was the Cindy Crawford scene as her a black guy play strip basketball. Maybe it is me, but I think Cindy was missing on purpose ha ha!
Most of the scenes have a little story like this that leads into the sex and it really has a good-natured feel to the site, lots of laughing and joking before the sex. I always like seeing the 90s models now and most of them have turned out pretty good. Most of these are American models too, which is a little different than what you expect from 21st Sextury.
Video quality at 720 high end is probably about as good as you could ask for from a bonus site. They do update weekly, nice preview if you want to see some of your old favorites and how they have matured over the years. I think the preview shows every scene they have. I know it shows a few pages.
Overall, if you were going to just join this site, I would say no, not for $30. But with 34 other sites included, it isn't bad and is worth taking a look at to see if any of your old favorites are still churning out new scenes. I say this because my knowledge of older models is mostly limited to the big stars like Devon and Cindy, some of you that are older than I am might know more or all of these models. The action is very good in the scenes too and what I recommend is if you join a 21st Sextury site, just find one that includes instant access to this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Comes with the Ron Harris studio site, if you didn't read that review, you can get both sites for 2 months for $40.
- Another near 400 photo shoots from the world famous photographer, high res pictures that nearly every set has at least 2000 high end, some upwards of 4000 high end
- Zips files and fast downloads, must be separate server than the studio site or just not as many people downloading from this one.
- The videos the site has are minimum 600 high end, good fast 3000 bitrates
- When added together with the studio site makes for one very impressive package overall
Cons:
- Probably should just be merged with the studio site.
- Has less than 10 videos, it is almost all a photo site
- This site couldn't be a standalone site, by itself, it would maybe be worth a 1 time join for 10 bucks
- Slight navigation frustration with the pictures opening in a new window. I am used to clicking back button, not close button. So when on other sites after being on this one, will accidentally close the window/site.
Bottom Line:
As you can see, this should never be considered a standalone site. It is very basic 400 or so photo sets, 10 videos, you can download the whole site in a day, or a few hours if sitting at the computer.
The good thing is, it is offered with the Ron Harris Studio site, which I also reviewed, if interested in the package. When you combine the two, you end up with nearly 1,000 photo sets and around 130 videos total. That makes for one really good site to me.
Quality is similar from site to site, pictures as large as 4000 high end, with around 95% of sets having at least a 2000 high end option. The videos on this site are not as good as the ones on the studio site, in resolution or actual content.
Models continue to be some of the finest in the world, what do you expect from a Playboy photographer? Just don't expect to see any amateur girls here and expect to see plenty of glam, if that is your thing, like me. There is a nice blend between the sites of models, American models, some Euros too, I think Ron has a thing for Sandra Shine. There is a good collection of Sandra here on this site.
I will say that this site will remind you somewhat of Viv Thomas' site. The photo sets are not packed with 200 pictures, most have 70-100 in each set and I really believe these guys do that to tell a story with their pictures, so you don't see 2 poses that are nearly identical.
This site makes for a really nice bonus to the studio site, and I recommend, but be sure to join through the Ron Harris site and get this as a bonus, by itself, it is $30 a month, you can get both by joining through Ron Harris for $40 for 2 months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Comes with Kelly Madison's site and I think Lana is just a hair more attractive than Kelly.
- Just like with Kelly's site, Lana's pictures are not hi-resolution, but are downloadable in zips
- Videos are 640 high end, but see cons
- Lana has a very glamorous look about her that I really like
- Download speeds a little above average, may not be as popular as Kelly's site, or have as much traffic.
Cons:
- Some videos are split, and there is that low bitrate again 600-700
- Pictures aren't hi-resolution and I think that really hurts with Lana, because she does have a glamorous look
- Site has stopped updating
- The amount of content isn't very impressive, 100+ pic sets, around 40 videos
- Feels like exactly what it is, an add-on or throw-in site for a bigger site
Bottom Line:
Lana is a really beautiful woman, not even talking about her huge boobs either. Her face, hair, she has a look of classiness about her and I hate to hear that she isn't updating anymore.
The site's navigation is very solid, very basic would be the best description. I would really like to have seen her pictures in high resolution just because of the classiness and how pretty she is.
Videos are rather boring, she doesn't look too thrilled in most of them. The bitrate doesn't help either, 1000k would be good enough. The pictures are in zip files, so you can at least collect them without having to piece them together manually. And that is probably the biggest plus of this site.
I think what I'm saying is that the site doesn't do anything that bad, or that great either. Lana pushes it above average though. Especially if you like big boobs. My last downloads on it were getting about 100 kb/s than my average speed which is probably just a sign that there isn't as much traffic on the site as on Kelly's site.
On an interesting side note, if you join Lana's site, the price is $19.95 per month, you get Kelly's site with it. If you join Kelly's site, it is $29.95 per month and you get Lana's site with it. So, you can get them both by going through Lana's site for $10 cheaper
Those who like women that look a little older than your typical teen model, and look a little classier, Lana might be the best I've seen. She gets that rare gorgeous label from me. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The "new" Lora is even more beautiful than before
- Very down to earth girl by watching her videos, has no idea she is a star
- As with any General Entertainment the site is very high quality (Eve Angel, Mya Diamond on Gen Entertainment as well)
- Decent update schedule 4-5 a week
- Great picture res, locations and videos are well above average quality
Cons:
- Site is new, very little content on it right now
- No hardcore at all
- Full price is way too high at this point, but TBP has the half price discount on it!
Bottom Line:
If you've read my reviews, you know that my favorite is Eve Angel. Eve (or some man) sends an email monthly and because I had been a member on Eve's site they invite members to see Lora's site for a discounted price. The site will be great one day. Lora, if you haven't seen her, for a long time was one of those girls who has the body, but her face had some fairly deep acne scars. The thing is, if you seen her back then, it makes the "new" Lora even better.
You could tell she was always bothered by the scars, now, she had some facial work done, nothing drastic. I would guess a laser procedure of some sort to reduce the scarring. She was so proud she even has pictures on her site of her in the hospital. Including a very sweet one where she is making a pouty face and waving to the camera. Like Eve, she seems to be a very normal girl who just happens to be very sexy and beautiful. The videos are very high quality, not HD but well above average, the problem is, there is less than 30 videos on the site as of right now. I'm sure once she is recovered from the surgery 100%, the site will become a daily updated one. The videographer on the Gen Ent. sites should be applauded. Close-ups, perfect side views as well. The locations vary and at least aren't too repetitive. Friends section includes Eve, Carol,and several other Euro stars. Give it some time, I can't recommend it yet unless you are a huge fan of Lora, even then, you won't get a lot of her just yet.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My wife was a ballerina and she’s petite. You know I’m interested.
- The site is very small, only 39 scenes, it does say it’s active but no updates since September 2019.
- All scenes have 1080p as the highest resolution, but all scenes have it. They have the smaller resolutions, too.
- Fast download speeds at 90% of my max.
- CCBill is the biller.
- It fits the niche well. I will say a little more about ballerinas and maybe they have a no pun intended shortage of models that are ballerinas?
Cons:
- No updates and 39 scenes works more as a tease for me.
- It’s very softcore even when it’s hardcore sex. It really tries to live up to the niche. It’s kind of artsy.
Bottom Line:
I know from real-life experience that there is not a big market anymore for ballet. It makes me wonder if they just can’t find enough ballerinas that are petite, to fuck. It is kind of sad from a porn perspective. This is a niche I believe could be very popular. You’ve got a lot to work with. Flexible women, smaller builds, teasing, and even turning them loose and having them go wild. You don’t really see that in these scenes. I have downloaded all of the scenes. The scenes are not that well thought-out. Some of the scenes are well under 20 minutes. I would take at least 10 minutes to let the ballerina do pirouettes and kick her leg up on the wall. Give some wardrobe slips. I would do something more that focused on the ballerina. That’s how you turn them wild. Pay attention to them for 10 minutes. Give them the spotlight and you will be happy with the result.
This is a Nubiles site. You get the 1080p, 720p, 540p or whatever that middle one is they do and a few mobile ones. I can tell you that downloading all 39 scenes didn’t hit a limit. I also downloaded the photos. It shows that Nubiles knew what they were doing with the pictures. The pictures are 8000 long end. You can get some wardrobe slips in there. They have 20-25 of just the ballerina. It then adds the guy and it shows they didn’t know what they were doing. It should have been 50+ of the ballerina.
The ballerinas they have are pretty and cute. They don’t exactly give off a sexual vibe. That could be the country they are from. I don’t know if these models are or were real ballerinas. My wife looked at some of it. She kind of gave me the twisted nose like, “nope”. If Brandi Love can have 487 stepchildren we can act like they are ballerinas. Which would mean they didn’t run out of ballerinas. I think that is the problem with the site. It tries really hard to stay in that ballet training area and it’s very softcore even during the sex. It’s good enough if you’re really into the niche. I don’t recognize most of the models. It’s not that unusual for me not to know newer models but I usually know a few. I’m guessing these women are from Russia. That is the downfall of using ballet or ballerina as a niche. There’s not a lot here to convince me that’s a ballerina. She is cute, she’s little and she has the right costume on but she’s not very disciplined. This niche could be so much better with the right producer and director. You could work heavy teasing in, clothing fetishes, wardrobe malfunctions but you would have to get away from that very softcore side.
Overall, the site is okay. It’s another freebie for joining Nubiles Porn. I didn’t see much here that’s different than what I saw on Petite HD Porn, also owned by Nubiles. The costume even is not fully updated. That’s a stereotypical costume. I think porn producers are missing out on a whole group of potential models by moving away from women that dance. They like to perform. They like the spotlight. That’s 2/3 of being a porn star. I am being serious. I believe in the right hands this niche could create a very strong site. I have seen the Russian attempts with the contortionists posing as ballerinas. Those were too softcore. It’s that personality contrast. These ballerinas are highly-disciplined. They don’t do anything too risky. You let them. They go wild. There’s my gift to porn producers. This site is a good site to look at if you have a Nubiles membership. It’s not much more than that. I will probably keep the videos just to look over them all but I haven’t seen anything that special about the ones I’ve watched.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore site that doesn’t stray from its name.
- Weekly updates.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Professional models and production.
- 818 scenes, each with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set (see cons)
- The models are all attractive but no amateurs that I have noticed.
- Tags on every scene and they are accurate with added filters for more customization.
Cons:
- It is a Gamma site, it seems like the subscriptions change daily. One day they are streaming-only, the next day they have downloads and streaming included. I waited for the downloads and streaming.
- The scenes can be repetitive, not quite cookie-cutter, but there’s not a lot of variety or story.
Bottom Line:
Hard X is a site that does most everything right except sometimes it’s too professional. The porn landscape has changed over the last decade. These sites stacked with often-used professional male and female actors and actresses are not as common. Maybe that makes the feeling of too professional more noticeable? The newest scene has Mick Blue, Liv Revamped and Ramon Namor, all are big names, all are very good at what they do but I do feel like I know what they’re going to do from seeing them in a lot of scenes similar to this Dual Penetration scene.
Is that really something to complain about? It is sex after all. I guess if they started playing cards and no one got naked or had sex, that would be something to complain about too. This is a very large site. I don’t know when Gamma took this site and it’s sister sites over but the use of the site and features are very good. The navigation can be used to search from newest scene to oldest. You can use the tags, most scenes list as many as 30 tags. When you use a tag, it then brings in the option of using filters to narrow down your tag search. It is all easy to use and there’s a clean layout too.
The technical quality is very good. The last two years of updates have 4K option on the videos. You also can download the videos starting at 160p up to 1080p on all 808 scenes. The photo sets are downloadable and have a 1920x1280 resolution on the photos. The tags are useful enough I can tell you there are 73 dual penetration scenes, 95 double blowjob, 417 anal and 89 threesomes out of the 808 scenes. I believe the pairing of this site with Gamma was a major step-up for this site and has allowed it to become of the best navigating and least frustrating sites I’ve used.
The action itself is where you or I even may have some problems. The threesomes or more are very good. The one on one male/female scenes are the ones that tend to become redundant and repetitive, even nearing cookie-cutter. They do advertise their scenes as gonzo. Most gonzo porn is nearing cookie-cutter. I do wonder how much the professional models add or detract from the scenes? This seems like it’s Mick Blue’s 1,008th time doing DP. He has to start getting the feeling of he’s been there before and that risks “going through the motions”. The interesting part about this site is it does come with four other sites. These sites are having the same possible positive/negative effect on each other. The sites each have a theme so you won’t likely find that theme on this site.
I do believe if you’re a fan of hardcore porn and professional models, you will be pleased with this site’s offerings and its added ease of use, the high technical quality, along with clean layout (only one ad at the bottom of the page), makes it an even more attractive option in the cluttered world of hardcore porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-08-2110:14am (Update History) Reason: Uploaded Dark X review instead of All Black X, corrected now.
Pros:
- One of those rare “there are no porn stereotypes” sites.
- It’s a newer site, it’s not very big but the 44 scenes it has comes with with X Empire network and if you like, especially black women, there are some favorites on this site like Alexis Tae.
- Very good technical quality on videos and pictures.
- Only limited by the Gamma DL Limits which is 300 GB per day. I’m positive this entire site is not 300 GB.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- The good though sometimes frustrating Open Life Support, Gamma Cash, whatever they call it. They’re helpful if you chat with them.
Cons:
- The size of the site is disappointing. I keep waiting on someone to make a black female solo site. This one just has 44 scenes. See the next con and you’ll understand more.
- Only updating once per month. Just think, by the year 2027, at this pace, they will reach 100 videos.
- The rotating offers X Empire and all Gamma sites offer. One day they give you downloads and streaming, the next day sign up is for only streaming.
Bottom Line:
This is really my feeling about this site and I hope it comes across. This is a very dull, boring site. It’s going to get one of my lowest scores in a long time. Even the scenes with the really attractive women are dull. It’s because nothing ever changes from scene to scene. The people do and that’s it. There are a couple of lesbian scenes and a couple DPs. The rest of the scenes are of a professional male model and a professional female model going through the motions. I haven’t felt that as much with the other sites on this network. There probably is some disappointment for me too in the fact that one of my all-time favorite black female models is on here but she looks worse than I’ve ever seen her, Misty Stone. She’s been around for 15 years probably. I’m not being disrespectful. She just doesn’t really look like herself and surely there’s not another black, curly-headed, Misty Stone. I even wonder if anyone else has this same problem with this one male actor. Jax Slayher. That guy could put a hyper kid to sleep just by looking at them. He has no personality, he just reminds me of everything that is wrong with porn. He’s in a lot of scenes on this network. I have had others that I don’t particularly care for like James Deen and after Rocco’s change, didn’t like him. Somebody do something with these sites. Make some sites for women that focus on the male so these little ego men can get their egos stroked and so the women can be the focus of these sites like this one. I guess it’s why I said I keep waiting on a black female solo site. Prince Yahshua is not annoying. I could do without him but he doesn’t detract from the scene like Jax Slayher does.
The site is small with 44 scenes and only 1 update coming per month. The good new is, if you find content you like on this site, all 44 scenes have 160p, 240, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have you covered from the smallest I have ever heard to the biggest you’ll find unless you find one of those 6K or 8K sites. That will always be one of those situations where the poor performances stand out even more. They put this much money into the site. Have all those high quality videos and the female models are most of the top black female models I know of. The pictures, while only around 2000 on the long end, are downloadable and have over 300 photos in some of them. You can see the potential this site would have as just a solo site.
The site’s navigation is very easy thanks to only 44 scenes. Even the network itself has very good navigation. You can switch from site to site without having to sign in to each site even though the sites are clearly different sites. That and the pretty models are the parts saving this site from completely bombing on the score. The picture are really better than the videos. They do a fairly good job of a creating photosets that focus on the female model in her clothes or bikini for the first 40-50 pictures even. The network access and the attractiveness of the females on this site will keep the score in the 70s. If I was just scoring the action itself, it would be in the 50s. Maybe that is why they are only updating once per month? This most recent visit brought a con or negative I hadn’t experienced so far. I had been logged out for some reason. I logged back in and got a full page advertisement with a button right in the middle of the screen to accept the upsell. Really, it probably wouldn’t be that bad of an upsell. Gamma has so many good sites these days. I do believe that’s the other part that saves this site. It’s owned by Gamma or managed by them. It has Gamma’s easy join, easy self-service cancel. The part I don’t understand about their cancellation page is why if I’m signed in do I need to put my username, email and transaction ID in to cancel? I’m signed in. It reminds me of when a site (non-porn) doesn’t recognize my computer and makes me jump through hoops to pay them a payment. I’m going to be honest with you, if someone wants to hack my computer and pay my bills, tell them have at it. I don’t think any porn member knows their transaction ID. Half the time, I don’t know which email I used to sign up. They could make the easy self-service cancel a lot easier. Unless you can’t find other sites with pretty black women on them, that’s really the only reason to visit this site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Premium models, I would say cream of the crop but that sounds like a porn niche.
- Not a huge site with 156 scenes but those are very good scenes (see cons on updates).
- Download speeds are very good on this one, hitting nearly 90% of my max.
- Good pictures (a few scenes have none) though quality could better at 1500x1000 and those are downloadable in zips.
- One of their few sites without 4K but they do offer a large number of download options on their videos.
Cons:
- No dates on the scenes, I haven't seen any new updates over the last 3 months and seeing the oddity of no 4K as part of an upgrade package of standalone sites, that's a bad sign for future updates.
- Some of the scenes don't have any pictures. The picture quality is barely acceptable and that's frustrating as it looks like they were trying (attempting) to have some focus on the photos.
- As a standalone site this is going to be hard to recommend at the premium price they are asking.
Bottom Line:
This is a strange site in that it is part of a premium standalone site upgrade pack but seems to not only be dead but also has no 4K option. That's more of a sign about the site's status of being active than a big deal about no 4K to me. I wouldn't download those anyway. It just makes me think this site is dead.
The content they do have is really good. Despite no 4K, they do offer these download options on the videos: 1080p, 720p with 7000 bitrate, lower bitrate 720p and they do the same with 480p having a higher bitrate version at almost 4000, then a lower bitrate version of 480p, so all is not lost, unless you really have to have 4K.
The models are a selling point of this site and also are maybe a sign of the age of the content. I know a lot of these models but stopped keeping up with models in 2018. Thank Japanese porn for me stopping the following of specific models.
I am going to say there are no new updates and there won't be anymore updates. Making this very close to a no as a standalone site. I could maybe see someone joining it for one month as a standalone. The downloads are unlimited and the speed I download them at was very fast.
The most disappointing part for me is they looked like they were trying to make this site have more focus on photos and even scenery/background setting. There are outdoor scenes, by the pool scenes and the ideal type settings for a photo site. It's just the photos are only 1500x1000 and for some reason, some scenes don't have photos.
I do think this is one advantage a site like this has. Navigation doesn't matter. There are 12 scenes per page, 13 pages of scenes. I have complained about other sites not splitting their scenes up into pages. This is a perfect example of why every site should do it.
The one part that does save this site and does make me say maybe 1 month as a standalone is the scenes are good. The outdoor scenes are not really exhibitionism. It looks like the backyard of a house with a pool but with imagination you can see those as exhibitionist scenes. The scenes are also mostly longer than the scenes on this upgrade premium standalone site network.
If you join one of these sites and do the upgrade this is a site you will definitely want to check out. It's not one of their best sites but it is a nice addition to the $65 package you can upgrade to. Score is purely based on the site as a standalone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I am reviewing this more as a network than individual site. You get several Asian sites and a few European or American sites. This is the site I joined through but I think Creampie Thais is considered the flagship site.
- 10 sites are included IF you join through Asian Suck Dolls (see bottom line).
- All the scenes I have watched on the different sites are downloadable in 480p or 720p. Creampie Thais has up to 4K.
- The action is pretty good on the sites and most if not all of the "models" look like amateurs to me.
- Easy cancel through a biller I had never used called Tea Money Media.
- Fairly large collection when you combine all the sites.
Cons:
- Most of the sites on this network look like they are 10 or more years old. Why does that matter?
- The dates on the scenes show every site as still updating with new content. That's a double con. I guess they don't think people will realize the video quality gives away the age of the content. Or that TBP has reviews from 5-10 years ago and the numbers haven't gone up.
- The European sites just threw me off (bottom line goes into this too).
- The navigation has some major glitches in it.
Bottom Line:
What we have here is a network of sites, a true network at that from Ghost Pro. I bounced back and forth on my score because there's some tomfoolery going on here. I always wanted to work that word into a review.
Ghost Pro has 17 sites. Most of them are Asian sites. I think Creampie Thais, Creampie in Asia and Thai Girls Wild are considered the three top ones but only one of those came with my membership to Asian Suck Dolls. If I wanted to pay more and join through Creampie in Asia, I would have got Thai Girls Wild too and only Asian bonus sites.
See that tomfoolery? Most of these sites are nearing generic. To get the other ones I would like to have, I am going to have to join through Creampie in Asia. They could combine this group of Asian sites and have a really nice 10-11 site Asian network but instead would rather have me pay them twice to get all 10-11 of their Asian sites. Tomfoolery is a nice word compared to what I should describe them as.
There is no way this is new content. I will use Trixie Swallows as an example. It launched in 2003, no kidding. The last TBP update in 2016 shows it having 160 videos. Here on 9/3/2020, it has less than 160, more like 130-135 and according to the site it has updated 6 times since the beginning of August 2020. Tomfoolery.
But I do like some of the content. Asian Suck Dolls is kind of like an Asian version of Amateur Allure. It has 60 scenes on it and these all look like amateurs to me. I don't recognize any of them. And they are not just oral scenes. The scenes have full sex and sometimes bouncy camera to boot.
Creampie Thais is a good site, TBP scored it 84. I do believe it is still updating as it has 4K videos and it's as good of a creampie site as I have joined. I'm indifferent to creampies so it's not getting any bonus for those from me but overall if you're into creampies there are nearly 200 videos and I do think they are updating.
Asian Sybian had potential for me since I like solo and even though Sybian doesn't make for the best porn it can be fun to watch women try it the first time. It only has 21 scenes on it and these young Asian women last about 4-6 minutes.
Go Go Bar Auditions is pretty good. I thought it would be Thai girls stripping and having sex onstage but it's not. It's more like casting couch scenes. They do have some of these with 1080p video.
I can see what they have done. They have included a couple newer sites with a couple older sites and thrown in some Euro sites to flesh the numbers out instead of packaging their best Asian sites all in one package so you have to join two different sites to get all their sites. I am tempted to join through Creampie in Asia which would get me their other Asian sites and if I do, it will have cost $50 total to get all their Asian sites. I am going on a hunch that says they didn't record the Euro sites they have.
I will say their creampie sites look as good as any of the Asian creampie sites and they offer good quality videos and downloads, something some Asian creampie sites don't offer.
There are pluses and negatives here. This will show it even more. As a true network each site has its own model list, the scenes are listed just from the site you select and that's something I really like in navigation of a group of sites. But there are major glitches. Up in the corner of every page is a dropdown box with the different sites you have access to in it. Each one you click on asks you to sign-in. Your login won't work on any of them. In the middle top of each page there is a "bonus sites" section. You click that and it shows all the sites included just like the dropdown box does, same sites. If you click the name of the bonus site ... it takes you to a join screen like you're not even logged in. If you click the link that says, "Take me to the members area" that works. One out of three ways to get to the other sites works.
That's how the whole network feels to me. If you do the math of good sites they include when you join Asian Suck Dolls, it's about a 1/3 good ratio too.
If you like creampies and Asian women in 1080p or 4K this might be the only site that offers that with Creampie Thais. Besides their other site Creampie in Asia. There's value here but you're going to work to get it.
I think my biggest surprise was how easy it was to cancel with them. I kept the score at a decent score as I think joining through Creampie in Asia will give me a better experience as far as content goes.
I just believe they could have themselves a very good Asian network if they stopped splitting their sites up into two packages. I might go ahead and join their other sites and see how it is.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bizarre, kinky, very hardcore and it's uncensored Japanese.
- 215 scenes, video with each, gravure (studio) photos, screencaps, all are downloadable.
- 75 models, they seem to be specific to this hard fetish content.
- 10 categories to choose from and some are quite a bit rougher than I'm used to.
- Easy to navigate, also has tags that help and are accurate.
- 1080p available on all scenes
Cons:
- Could use more video download options, 1080p, 540p and a mobile version.
- Probably more hardcore than the average porn fan would be into.
- Updates are not following a schedule. Latest update was March 30, 2020, previous one was December 2019.
Bottom Line:
We will say you took Kink's dungeon and moved it to a dark alley in Japan. Then you set it on fire and conjured up demons. That's kind of how this site feels.
There are sexy parts, some very pretty models but the fetishes and punishment takes center stage.
If you just randomly selected some scenes from here there's a good chance each one would freak you out a little more than the previous one. If I was going to make a direct comparison to another site, it kind of reminds me of Public Disgrace. The scenes feature multiple men. One female. They take turns with her, they burn candle wax on her and something I had never seen, dropping burning candle wax onto the tongue.
The scenes could use subtitles. There's obviously a story going on in each.
There is even the use of a pillory. The amount of burning objects and fire didn't get me too excited as my one big fear in life is fire. They will light something on fire and put it near the model's face. I'm sure like Kink, they are very careful and it's safer than it looks but it's out there for sure.
The collection is not real big with 215 scenes. I do like that they include gravure pictures in zips since you rarely see the woman looking happy in the scenes.
The quality is good, I would have been happier if they had 720p instead of 540p but that's not a huge problem. Every scene has 1080p option.
I think people that are into bondage would be the direct audience. There's a lot of rope play and restraints. As hardcore of it seems to be there's some scenes that are very erotic. You get some where they have the model in spread eagle and you're looking right at her pussy as she's getting wet and stimulated. One the other side of it, there's one with a model with probably a dozen clothespins attached to her boobs, suspended in the air with melted candle wax stuck on her face AND a large flame in front of her face. Maybe I'm not as understanding to some of this but wouldn't the flame touching the melted wax restart the flame on the wax?
None of the women seem to be anymore despair than on a site like Kink. These models seem very acclimated to this style of porn and most even look like they enjoy it. It's hard to tell without subtitles and with the stereotypical laugh/cry for help some of the Japanese models have.
It's definitely not my favorite site but you do get some good multi-person scenes. One of the scenes has as many as 4 men with Magic Wand vibrators using them all at the same time on the woman. They have some homemade looking sex toys too like what looks like a chainsaw but instead has a dildo on the end.
If they do something better than most American sites in this type of porn it's that the Asian models are more believably under serious stress and fear. That can make it difficult to watch if you're sensitive to seeing someone in despair or it could be exactly what you like. Maybe it's the lack of English? It makes the "acting" more believable.
If nothing else, it's an interesting site. It is also included with the excellent Japan HDV network. Which is why I mentioned subtitles. The scenes on Japan HDV have subtitles. These don't. It's worth a look just to show you a different style of bondage than we are used to here in the western hemisphere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the better blowjob-focused sites/networks.
- Has seen a lot of change in both how the site looks and how it works, all for the positive.
- An interesting feature by adding a live intercourse video every few days. As I've said before, at least this one is trying.
- Averages right at one update per day (across the network).
- Has some kinkiness, from gaping to pissing to deep-throating, pretty sure Veronica Avluv can't film a scene without pissing in it.
- Mostly known porn stars. Sometimes that's a pro, sometimes a con.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Their live site, Immoral Live, really helps the network as a whole. It's really the only site on this network that goes into sex and the content on it is pretty good. You can watch live or download the recorded show.
- The navigation works better than I remember it working, this network is the same as the old My XXX Pass. But see cons...
- Pretty big network, will go into in BL
Cons:
- Navigation works well but man is it ever cluttered? Don't mind me, I'm the OCD guy. I will go further on this in the BL (that's how much it annoys me).
- Eventually, you can have too many blowjobs. It can be quite repetitive. The site names tell you that: Throated, Mommy Blows Best, 1000 Facials, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live.
- The network itself isn't bad for ads but there was a pre-checked cross-sale and seconds after unchecking it and submitting my payment, a pop up popped up for the exact SAME offer they offered in the pre-checked cross-sale!
Bottom Line:
I'm really not looking to be too harsh. This network has always been a solid network. They do a lot of things right. Including:
Picture sets that you can download
High quality videos (4K available on the newer ones).
Very large catalog of content and the site itself is a "clean" site unless you look at the menu toolbar.
It's there that you have these options:
Videos, Pornstars, Pictures, Forum, Interactive Porn, Free scene, Dating, Live Sex, Specials. That's a lot in one horizontal bar, right? There's another one above it! Above it, you have your profile, the Blow Pass logo or homepage button, Throated, 1000 Facials, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live ... but wait, there's also a clock that is counting down the time to the next Immoral Live show too.
I've said it many times, if my dad ever taught me one thing that I hold onto it's KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid). I'm not really complaining that much but as nice as this network looks, it looks like they would work on the clutter and double ad mentioned in the cons.
The content here is good. The models are mostly American, tattoos and implants are common. The numbers are very good:
3,897 scenes, the earliest update dates back to 2005 and it was one of my favorite models, Tiffany Taylor. Most if not all scenes have photos too.
You will run into the lower quality problems in the older scenes. The oldest ones are 360p. From there, you get random quality.
Immoral Live has the best quality with up to 4K options, its content dates back to 2011 and the 2011 videos have up to 1080p. Very little to complain about there.
The other sites date back in the 2005-2006 range and the first 5 years of those sites have varying quality. The newer content has 1080p but not 4K.
They have nearly 2,000 models (1920 or so). I'll continue to return to that one con, the amount of blowjobs are great for those into oral scenes but for me any niche like this will become boring.
I will say Throated can be somewhat extreme. I know we've had discussions about what constitutes a deep-throat and for me it's mascara dripping down the model's face and dry heave sounds, they have both of those. I know that there are some who prefer that style of oral sex, they would really like this network.
In scoring this site, I am scoring it a little higher than I see it. It's similar to when someone tries a solo site and they expected more than solo. I don't think it's fair of me to go taking points away for reasons that might not bother others.
There's a lot of content with a lot of models. Many older A-list models too, I even seen Rebecca Linares in the model list. I had completely forgot about her. There's also plenty of cute, newer models like Jenna Fox, Kitty Carerra and one of my old favorites that I had forgot about Cindy Starfall. So, it's okay for me as a collector and I think it's very good for someone looking for a large collection.
They have multiple scenes of many of the models, like Cindy Starfall, who has a scene as far back as 2012 and they just updated with a new scene of her here in 2018. She has 7 scenes, total. To go back to a strength for a site like this one and it's why I most likely remembered it in a positive way, some of their photo sets are very good. It fits here because my favorite photo set of Cindy Starfall is from this network.
I don't remember if I complained about this in my review of the network when it was My XXX Pass but one of the more frustrating parts for me is that the blowjob rarely progresses. I know blowjob is in the name and people will complain if anything more than a blowjob happens but that in and of itself is what leads to the boredom. I have had the same type of complaint with handjob sites and though it goes against the name, I like CFNM sites that end up having the woman naked too.
I would review Immoral Live separately because I do think it adds way more than would be expected but I've yet to be able to watch one of the shows live. Looks like the next live show is Thursday morning at 9 AM EST. I'm in an office at 9 AM. The recorded scenes I've watched are pretty good.
It's a good network overall that has a new name and a new coat of paint. It would be rated higher for those who are into the more extreme parts I listed above and who are into blowjob porn. I'll grab the scenes I've lost from my collection over the years. There's also a lot of content but keep in the mind the technical limitations of the older content, too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my all-time favorite networks.
- Very good download speeds.
- The archive on this network is huge.
- Does mostly have softer content, even in the b/g content. You'll find a few rough scenes here and there.
- The biggest collection of the infamous Euro stars from 2003-2009, known as the "No Take Dick Six". They'll be in the BL.
- I will say the newer scenes are getting better.
- High quality all-around the network.
- Navigation is good for a network.
- One of the last networks to have picture sets with every scene and they're really photo sets, not screencaps from the videos.
Cons:
- Update schedule is below average, much like 21Sextreme (the sister site), I expect a network of 21 sites to have at least 1 update per day across the whole network but so far in June, there are 17 updates in 19 days.
- The amount of sites that are no longer updating. Some are understandable like Sweet Sophie Moone (retired) but there are way too many not updating, will list in BL.
- Those damned picture captchas, no, I won't click on the storefront. Becoming harder to cancel too. I had to know my username, my password, the email address and click a captcha. I store my user/pass in my browser so I rarely know those.
Bottom Line:
I once called this one of the greatest networks ever. I have a still crush on the models known as "The Don't Take Dick Six" and they were all updating back then with new content. Now, you're going to be lucky to find many sites that are updating on this network. Here's the list of sites that aren't updating and haven't updated in more than a few months:
My single-biggest frustration here is I like softcore content, I like lesbian content, solo content, all of which 21 Sextury made their name with. Of the still updating sites, we have: Asshole Fever, Deepthroat Frenzy, DP Fanatics, Footsie Babes*, Gapeland, Lez Cuties* and Pix and Video*. The ones with asterisks are softcore, traditional 21 Sextury content.
The positive if there is one, I lost all of my 21 Sextury content so I'm back to get the no take dick six content. They are:
Sandy from Club Sandy, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Sophie Moone and Anetta Keys. They do have one of Eve with a man and maybe one of Sandra and Sandy had some close encounters but for the most part, these 6 women either shot with each other or solo. A few others kind of came along too, Zafira, Peaches and Eufrat.
Times change but so does my review score. There's so little here for me once I collect all my lost content, I might have to let it go over into a second month since my ISP is teasing me with 200Mbps and I feel stuck at 100Mbps.
I really don't have a problem with hardcore scenes, anal, I think it all has its place but when 90% of the sites that are updating on the internet are doing anal, hardcore, why would 21 Sextury, once a leader in porn -- start following? I also gave 21 Sextreme a fairly low score coming from me and my score here might not show how I really feel. I'm taking into consideration that there's a lot of porn users out there who haven't ever been a member. They'll love the archives. I only do because Microsoft gave me bad advice on backing up a computer.
The quality is very good. The newest videos have 8 download options from 180p to 1080p. The newer picture sets are hitting around 5000 on the long end and are downloadable. The new models and scenes are fairly impressive. I've noticed Alyssia Kent as a very attractive new model for them but just being honest, she has 4 scenes and all 4 are boy/girl hardcore. Is it too much to ask for a solo scene of her? I know that fans used to get very frustrated with the no take dick six for not doing hardcore but did we really need to go to the opposite pole to make everyone happy? And again, if Brazzers started only posting solo scenes, it would cause an outrage. It's why I do rate DDF quite a bit higher than 21Sextury. The newest scene on Lez Cuties is very good but overall, the newer content is letdown by a followed path from scene to scene.
Despite my ranting, I would still recommend it to those who haven't tried it. Those who haven't tried it will have so much variety to go through but those of us who have been here since 2007, well, we're pretty much watching an old favorite die off. I haven't been on 21 Naturals in awhile. It now comes with 21 Naturals, 21 Foot Art and here you go, 21 Erotic Anal. I think they should combine the three networks, Sextury, Sextreme and Naturals.
At least it will be fun for newer members. I should have put this in the cons too but for those going to the archive (pre-2010), most of those scenes have 720p but some only have 480p.
Let's wrap it up with some numbers:
The 21 Sextury Network has around 18,000 scenes (pictures and video with each scene). I say around because I think they're counting 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals in that number but there's no way to tell. They also have 4,000 models but that does include males and women who have to be from 21 Sextreme.
Hopefully, you'll read through this before seeing "recommended".
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once rated Club Sandy a 99. I feel like me giving it an 82 is a generous nod to nostalgia.
- The site is still updating, but only twice a month. It used to update daily.
- The included network access still makes this a good join for the TBP price. BL will go into this since I'm in a year long subscription.
- If you are a collector of certain models there are plenty here with large archives of content.
- Lots of remastering of old scenes. I consider it a pro since I've seen scenes as old as 2007 that are remastered into 1080p.
- Lots of compilation videos. Those could be a con for some, but they are pretty good for discovering models you might not have realized you like.
- Good download speeds, very consistent.
- Picture sets, downloadable as zips, still come with each scene, but they could make it a little easier to find them.
Cons:
- Two updates per month. I'll never understand the point of having a network that kills off your best-known sites.
- Navigation is best described as clunky. It's worst described as what the hell are they thinking?
- Content split between three networks. And they've removed their previous token system that at least allowed you to join the other networks to get that one or two rare scene you can't find on your hard drive.
- Where's the creativity 21 Sextury used to have?
Bottom Line:
I've been hanging onto year-long subscriptions to 21 Sextury and DDF Network for 9-10 months. These two networks have been longtime staples in my porn rotation. The complete dropoff of Club Sandy is a disappointment for me, but not all is lost. I'll try to stick to the good parts then add the bad parts to explain the disappointment.
If you've never been a member here and don't know much about Euro models, then this is a great place to start. The star of Club Sandy, Sandy, has always been and still is one of the prettiest, most erotic European women I've ever seen in porn. The site and network is loaded with her content. Including compilations, Sandy is featured in over 500 scenes. Blue Angel, Eve Angel, Zafira, you name them, they too have 100+ scenes on here.
That's where a problem comes up. The big Euro models were mostly from the mid to late 2000s. Following their departures, they've yet to develop many major stars. So, joining this site and network is more of an archival join. I would like to say the newer content (2013 forward) has some great content, but most of it just comes off as cookie-cutter hardcore porn. My point here is if you've been a member before and still have the content on a hard drive, I'm not for sure there's much reason to join.
The remasters aren't listed as remasters so you have to look for them. One I really liked was an early Blue Angel scene from 2007 that has been remastered into 1080p resolution with 6000+ bitrate, it looks very good. My one problem with the remastered videos is there's no in-between. You can either download the old version, which was 540p or jump all the way to 1080p. I almost always prefer the 720p videos, but the remasters don't have that option.
You really can't complain about the quality here, but you can complain about the newer videos being just like the one released earlier in the month and those are just like the two released last month, this goes on for several years. On top of that, you have the three network split of content. The way they've handled the splitting of their network should be used to show why you shouldn't start changing how things work.
Where I know I'm being too hard on them is the lack of Sandy content, I think she retired a few years ago. Maybe the length of my membership has made me feel like there's just not enough to keep me interested without the "old" models?
Back to the positive:
While they used to be known for removing some scenes, it now looks like they've added all of them back. Including the very rare Eve Angel hardcore b/g scene in a bathroom from early in her career. I've also noticed some older Sophie Moone scenes I hadn't seen in years. Biggest problem here is you have to know what you're looking for so that could be frustrating for new members who don't know about the older models.
I still believe it's worth joining since you do get access to the 21 Sextury network, but I really don't think it's (the network) is even coming close to the DDF network these days.
The good news is the newer content is all shot with the 1080p option. The bad news is a large percentage of the new content is anal/hardcore/boy-girl. As soon as I can re-review the network as a whole, I will and don't see it rating much over an 85 as a whole. Lots of good older content here, some in poorer quality, but still featuring some of the best models in the world.
To end, I think if you're new to the network it's definitely worth a join ... for a month. I wouldn't recommend the year subscription to anyone as I don't think the newer content is even close as good as the older content. Also recommended to collectors, especially if you don't have the remastered older videos. Just make sure the videos you're looking for didn't get sent to 21 Sextreme or else you'll need to join it too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A nice alternative for when you've viewed every model on Met-Art.
- Owned by Met-Art, has similarly high production values as Met-Art's other sites.
- Update schedule is straightforward. Updates daily. You get 1 video a week and 6 photo sets per week.
- Videos have 1080p option (since early 2007) and photos are close to 6000 on the long end and have been for five years. Prior to that they were still over 4000 on the long end.
- 320 models with most having multiple scenes/videos/photo sets.
- Has always been a little more risky than Met-Art has been, though Met-Art is similar to Errotica Archives now in terms of what all they show.
- Quite a few girls you don't see on many sites, which led to me joining it since they had 3 models I've collected for nearly 10 years.
- I'm going to say it's exclusive content, but the archive in the name bothers me since this site is owned by Met-Art. I don't recognize any of the sets.
Cons:
- I had a love/hate relationship with Met-Art for many years and I kind of feel the same way about Errotica Archives. They have the models, the high technical quality, then I open a photo set and everything feels bland.
- Videos that tease masturbation by ... masturbating. I like tease as much as anyone does, but if you're going to be fully nude, legs spread, touching yourself, just keep going instead of rolling over into another sexual position only to repeat the above "tease".
- Site kind of feels like a knock-off of Met-Art or an extension, which I think it used to be offered in a bundle with Met-Art years ago.
- Navigation needs a "photos" tab. It has a "top photos" tab which shows me the highest rated or most popular photos, but doesn't line all the photo sets up for me. Videos/films has its own tab, so I don't get why there's not a photo tab.
Bottom Line:
These type of sites are always hard for me to review. Naked, beautiful women. Showing everything they have. Only to disappear like an oasis. Gives new meaning to came and gone.
This site does nearly everything right. Consistent updates, high technical quality videos and photos in zip downloads. Price is good with the PU discount. But I've seen it all before. The main draw for me was the content of models Veronica Fasterova (Verunka on this site), Dominika A/Dominika C (Dominika on this site) and Chiara. Errotica Archives has over 40 photo sets and videos of these 3 models who I've collected for 5+ years each.
Beyond those three there was some interest, but most of the content is fairly predictable and tame. There are sets with more than one girl in them, but somehow they have figured out a way to take 75-100 photos without the models doing anything remotely sexual. The videos show the model masturbating, starting to get into it only to quickly change positions and start this same pattern again.
I was more open to these types of sets a few years ago, but I just don't get much out of them these days.
I do think the site is very good at what it does. Young, slim, nude models frolicking in the park. Running around naked prior to the filming even starting since most sets start with the model completely nude. Which is a no-no with me. Technically, the site is a 90, but in terms of entertainment for me it's maybe an 80 ... and that's a maybe. I went with 82 since it is a good site, but it would be higher for anyone who likes artsy, pretty pictures.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons:
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line:
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
