Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The last of the Kink sites on my list to join, Kink's sites, generally speaking are very high quality and are just different enough from the norm to keep most of us from getting bored.
- It's a site about butts, my favorite part of the female, below the neck and they have some of the best butts in porn on here.
- As usual, Kink will do something in at least one or sometimes 20 scenes, that challenges our morality as viewers. I call it pro since I feel like this is done in a safe, controlled, consensual environment and it works to break our boredom with traditional porn, push our limits, etc..
- You get good download speeds here.
- Navigation is as all other Kink sites. I think it's a bit clunky, but if you join enough Kink sites, you start to get the hang of it or you just speed up your mouse scroll wheel.
- Videos have up to 1280x720 resolution and are nice and clear. If a bit dark thanks to setting.
- One update per week is a borderline pro/con.
Cons:
- As mentioned in pros, Kink will push your boundaries, they do so on this site with enemas, for me.
- Pictures would have been really good for this site since they could showcase the butts/thighs, and they have them, but I'm nearing Kink burnout on downloading 4-6 zips to get one photoset.
- Maybe more than any of the Kink sites, this one seemed to border on formulaic for me. It could be the Kink burnout, it could just be that most scenes seemed like the same thing. Reminds me a lot of the now dead Give Me Pink site and to a lesser extent, In the Crack.
Bottom Line:
I had found myself in a porn rut a few months ago and decided to start trying these Kink sites in succession. I can't recommend a studio higher than Kink when it comes to pushing boundaries...tastefully. I know there are sites that are more hardcore than these, but I don't know if any focus so much on the model as these. Many rely on the male to make the scenes more violent. Kink does seem to let the models work at their own pace.
The quality is here is like any of the new(er) Kink sites. The videos have the 1280x720 option, there is also a 720x480 option, these come in either WMV or MP4 depending on your choosing. I don't want to go too deep into the pictures, but will say this, if you're a picture fan, you most likely won't be happy. Since I've written multiple reviews on Kink sites, I don't want to waste a lot of space on saying the same things I have before. Plain and simple, you can download 20-25 pictures in a zip, 4-6 of these zips per set, just like it was in 1999 or 2000. I downloaded a total of 8 total photo sets, so they're bordering on "why even post them?" I took points off ATK and other sites, over 4 years ago, for doing it. It's unacceptable in almost 2013.
The scenes themselves should be a big selling point to me. I like butts, thighs, and not just curvy, but any that are not toothpick thin or to the point of cottage cheese nightmares. Everything in between those are good.
My first problem was expected. Enemas are just a flat-out no to me. I remember years ago on here, both Denner and I, talking about Give Me Pink having girls shoot milk out of their butt. That was the line this site crossed for me. I still don't like gape videos that much either. There's plenty of gape here. So much in fact, I think a small nation could find their new home. Neither of these are huge complaints, but I am trying to show the extreme the site goes to, for those considering it as a possible join. You sometimes get the feeling the women are in a dare contest, "I can get a stick, a pool cue and a bat in my butt".
This is simply a problem for me because I like the butt. The curves of it. The silhouette of it a shadow. If you're into the extreme insertions and projectile shooting, you will like this site. Nothing wrong with it if you do. That part just isn't for me.
The good part, they do have the less extreme sets. You get a lot of good lesbian strap-on action and I've never had a problem with women being rough with women. I find it erotic even. The models here are more to my liking than some of the Kink sites. You will see a lot more curvy models here than they typically have.
The site has a pretty good sized collection. I'm counting 217 scenes as of 12/11/12. While this a good-sized collection for unique content like this site has, when I figure in the sets I wasn't even considering, it goes down quite a bit and was what caused me to lower the score some. I typed these out in notepad as I was looking through the site for sets I was interested in.
My counts could be off 1-2.
At least 42 scenes involved enemas.
At least 12-15 more involved instruments that are either gynecological, or look gynecological.
So roughly 1/4 of the scenes didn't appeal to me right from the start. If those scenes would appeal to you, then add another 5 points to the score. I found my boundary there.
The rest of it, to the dismay of some, the delight of others, is more straightforward, rough anal sex, be it with a woman or man or group. There's fisting, there's lesbianism, and I mostly enjoyed these scenes. I'm on the indifferent boat when it comes to fisting.
What it adds up to, if the pictures were easy to download in one zip and the enema/gynecological scenes aren't counted, the site would have scored 94 for me, but because it only updates once a week, there's no telling if 3 of my 4 monthly updates will be in the don't appeal or appeal group, so I can't just say "look over" those scenes.
The models save it for me. The regular Kink girls are around, Isis Love, Skin Diamond, Vicki Chase, would love to see more Kelly Divine and Francesca Le. It leaves me feeling the same way as i have about the other Kink sites. By the 30th day of my membership, I'm usually thinking "time to move on to another niche". It definitely teeters on repetitive, but I don't think that would sit in for those who only join for a month at a time. Way too many puns in this.
I would recommend it most for fans of In the Crack and Give Me Pink. The one big difference, both of those sites excel or excelled in Give Me Pink's case, at high quality photos too. Some of this action is better watched in a still photograph than in real-time movement.
It definitely is good for breaking the monotony of mainstream porn. I would recommend it to most people. One other note is the ass-worship, I do like these and first saw this type of porn on Evil Angel, so if you're a fan of those there is something here for you too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another site in the ATK line of sites, do not take the score as the deadset score. There will be an add +5 or -5 at the end of bottom line.
- As with the other ATK sites there is a lot of content, newer videos are HD, pictures are still the big draw here and are zipped, will explain sizes in BL.
- Really good download speeds, actually reached speeds I hadn't reached before.
- While there is a theme here, "petite" most models in the 18-24 range fit the petite group, so there are a lot of models.
- Going to go out on a limb and will further in BL when I say this site is like joining a best of ATK, since you get content from all their sites except Archives, as long as the model is petite.
- Navigation is pretty basic and easy as long as it's working.
- I couldn't tell you the update schedule since it seems to vary, but there does seem to be daily multiple updates, will further in BL.
Cons:
- To me there are two big cons with this site, one will be completely subjective, the other will be more based on your experience with these sites. They are:
#1 Programming nightmare, missing thumbnails by the dozen for the first 3 weeks of my membership. I will give them credit because it looks like they fixed it. There are still other problems, I've seen videos with parse link errors, no clue what that is, just know it means I can't download the video. I have videos that are corrupted and had a few zips that were corrupted too.
#2 Exclusivity. As a collector, exclusivity is one of the most important things to me. There is a high percentage of models here who have no content exclusive to this site. It does however come from one of the ATK sites. That's why this is subjective based on your experience. I joined ATK Exotics in December/January, ATK Premium in January/February, ATK Galleria in February/March and ATK Petites in March/April. I have a lot of Petites content already.
Bottom Line:
I'll jump right in where the cons left off since I ran out of characters.
Though I numbered it as #2 con, my biggest con was the amount of overlapping content here on ATK Petites. If I hadn't been to the other ATK sites, I would probably be rating this site in the 90s, but I have, estimating, 60% of the content Petites has that I would want from my memberships to the other ATK sites. This is straightforward enough by them in the videos where you will see ATK Premium watermarks on videos, ATK Galleria, ATK Exotics, etc...
It's not straightforward when I join though. The preview lets me see all the models and # of photos, # of photosets, # of videos. It doesn't tell me that I may already have 50-100% of those from their other sites. I have complained in the past about DDF doing this, so it's only fair that I stay consistent and complain here as well.
It's not to say this site is a ripoff or isn't good. As it is, I give it an 85 because there is a good amount of exclusive content here. The score would have been a little lower if the programming problems hadn't at least shown some improvement, which they did a few days after I posted the comment about the missing thumbnails.
Here is a very small example of how exclusive the content is to this site. From March 25th-March 28th, there have been this many updates.
32 photo sets
16 videos
Those are staggering numbers. That's 48 combined videos and picture sets in 4 days, or 12 per day.
8 of those sets are exclusive to this site, that's pictures and videos. So, 8 of 48 are exclusive to this site. That's roughly 16% exclusive. Having had memberships to 3 of their other sites, it means I have most of this content.
The update schedule is impossible to list because it changes daily, one day they had 12 photosets, another day they had 5 photosets and 6 videos.
Okay, enough bitching. ATK sites are fun sites. You're not going to find much if any airbrushing in their photos, you're going to see newer models and you'll also find old sets of current hardcore stars doing innocent photosets as a newcomers. I do get annoyed by the hairy sets and the even worse, "scary hairy" as they have them tagged, but overall, the girls range from cute to very pretty. It's not close to glam. Nearly all sets start in very normal clothes from jeans, shorts, skirts with some lingerie mixed in.
The newer picture sets have 3 zip sizes, largest is 2000x3000 resolution and vice versa. Petites can be a little confusing here since some of the newer sets from their other sites are not as high resolution, but most of the newer sets are the above number. They do have a custom zip feature that works when I have tried it.
This is an in-between one. The videos are very hit/miss. Most of the girl/girl videos aren't very good. The solo videos are the best ones on the site and usually these are worth a download. The boy/girl videos are borderline poor. I'm not talking about technical quality either. They are poor in the sense that you don't get a believable feeling from the scenes, it's very clinical even. I had the same feeling about Nubiles boy/girl videos too so ATK shouldn't take it too personally. I do get the feeling that a lot of these girls are not comfortable on video, just like I get on Nubiles videos, if they're not comfortable, I would rather see more photosets of them because the photos are really good.
Technical quality on the newer videos is good, at least a year, maybe two years of HD videos, but I really think if you're here for the videos, you're going to be disappointed.
This was my first time as a member on Petites or I would have known that most of the content comes from the other ATK sites. I do think the ATK sites have made big positive strides in their site design, navigation, search options and they continue to get tons of models.
My advice is if you prefer one of the niches like hairy, exotic, to try one of those if you're just starting out with these sites, but if you want a really good overview of all their niches, Petites would be a very good place to start. If you've been on their other sites in the last few months, I can't even recommend Petites because you're going to see a lot of content you have already seen.
As a new, non-biased towards genres, member, I would recommend this site as the one to join. It's like buying a greatest hits album by a band you're new to.
If you're new to the ATK sites or haven't been to them in the last year or two, add 5 to the score for a 90. If you are not new to the sites and have been on the other ATK sites recently, take 5 points off for an 80.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-12-1106:49pm (Update History) Reason: Problems with canceling
Pros:
- A site based around mostly amateurs, the female orgasm and real masturbation. As a plus, if you have a wife or girlfriend, that likes porn, you also get access to their site that is focused on male masturbation.
- Price is good through TBP
- Newer videos are 1280x720, will further this in BL
- Newer pictures are near 3000 long end and come zipped.
- Taking a shot at around 400 models, surprisingly, for an amateur site, nearly all the women are attractive. I think that's a big plus. Even the older (mid and up 40s) models that would normally not appeal to me, do here.
- Call it a pro or con, there are some pornstars on here. Ramona Luv seems to have been on nearly all amateur sites in 2004-06 and she's here, Aaliyah Love is here as a guest model, I don't mind them, but some might. I would love to see more Ramona.
- Decent search, it works, but the whole navigation of the site could be updated, reminds me of Little Mutt in how the site works.
- Very good download speeds
Cons:
- The videos are not that clear, not even the 1280x720 ones. It could be lighting, could be the amateur "effect", but the older videos are hard to watch on a big monitor.
- Inconsistencies, one model, Isabella, has a high video download option, it's 720x480 and a bit blurry. A newer model doesn't have high video download option and the medium option is clearer than Isabella's high option.
- If I could convince them of one thing, please stop the video from streaming when I click on it to download. Firefox users should turn to No Script, trust me, some of these videos are orgasm focused so there's nothing like one starting and a loud moan roaring through your house at 4 in the morning.
- My main feeling here in the cons is that it needs updating, not the actual content updates, but the site. It took me 10 minutes to find the download link for photo sets.
Bottom Line:
We had discussed a little about this site being like I Feel Myself. It's not a lot like it, but it does have short 40-60 second videos of the woman's orgasm face that are spliced from the actual full body videos. So if you're into I Feel Myself and just seeing the face during orgasm, you will like those, I really didn't since they are so short.
Next up, interview videos. They're everywhere. Since they don't an interview tag, I scanned through the videos archives and these interview videos look to come about every 5th update. I really don't like interview videos and they take up the space of an update too. I do understand the use of them on a site like this since it's more convincing that these girls are not pros, but the pros have ruined interviews for most of us. For what it's worth, most of the girls on here seem genuinely sweet and playful.
I don't know what the deal is with the videos not looking good.
But wait a minute, the content is really good. If you're into strip, tease, which I am, you may not like these videos. There is almost no tease, it's get naked, masturbate for 7-10 minutes, orgasm. This isn't as bad as it sounds. It does add to the girls probably being filled with anxiety, nervousness. Some of the girls are much more confident and have more fun with it.
The unusual masturbation techniques used in some are interesting, erotic even, but I'm not for sure how sexually arousing they are to watch. Maybe that's me, I don't find a girl rubbing her clit against the corner of a bathroom sink to be arousing. I'm guessing what is being shown here though is that this is how the girls are comfortable masturbating. I don't believe there is a fake orgasm on the site. You get some squirters, some that make a milky mess in minutes and what I think they have going for them the most, the girls are really good-looking girls. There are few here and there that don't really appeal, but most look like regular, cute to really pretty girls.
They're all not skinny or in perfect shape. I was really surprised that I liked the 45 year old Barbie Lynn's bathtub shoot. I think they are going to sell most of these models on being real, erotic instead of drop dead gorgeous.
These are the numbers I'm coming up with based on their search engine.
Nearly 1,000 videos, and as said earlier the interview ones and short orgasm face ones are included here. Still, the site has grown since I was last on it. From the way I read it, they had several sites and decided to put all the content on them on this site. I don't remember them having over maybe 400 videos last year.
I will say they could be more clear about what you get. When I click "our sites", it shows me having access to the male masturbation site Club Stroke and having access to Whispering Lily, this is a community site that has a forum, shows the new updates at Yanks.
This is where it gets confusing. Also listed in "our sites" is Solo Touch. This shows as being a male and female masturbation site. Well, to enter it, I have to register a profile on Whispering Lily. When I go to Whispering Lily it says that all their content has been put on Yanks or Club Stroke, so I have no clue what this Solo Touch is or if its female content is already on Yanks.
A little frustrated that some of the models only have pictures. I understand that not all are willing to do videos, but I still want to mention that to potential members. Another frustrating one that I think is very important, some of the picture sets are only 15-25 pictures. Again, I understand that those are older sets.
May sound like I have mostly negative feelings here, but it's not true. The frustration comes from how good this content is and how much better it could be.
They stick with the solo theme really well. There are even dozens of videos of two girls masturbating together, but not really touching each other. This is a whole other level of erotic since you get the feeling they are drawing some inspiration from looking at the other masturbating. A few do go into girl/girl and those scenes are really good if you're into lesbian porn.
Updates don't seem to follow a set schedule. For the last month there are 25 updates, those 25 breakdown like this, 8 photo sets, 10 masturbation videos, 5 interview videos and 2 of the orgasm face only videos.
Overall, I really like the site because of the models. I will be keeping the majority of what I download, which is rare for me. And it's nice in a way that the videos are short 7-10 minutes, even at HD, are only 200 MB or so.
On recommending it, if you need tease in every video then maybe not. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn these days, this site is highly recommended. I think it's much better than I Feel Myself and would compare it more to Little Mutt or maybe even FTV in some ways without the glam. I would recommend it. I'm enjoying it and it will slip into my normal rotation of sites. More of Ginger P would be nice too!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Porn Pros network, one of the more creative uses of reality porn.
- Has 42 sets overall, videos are near HD quality, but are a little grainy, I'm thinking for that "authentic amateur" feel.
- All 42 scenes are ones I will keep and really think this reality niche has been missed by most networks.
- Download speeds are very good with a DL manager, terrible without a DL manager.
- Has a good believability factor going for it. Even though you will probably know these models are porn stars, they do a good enough job of making it seem realistic to convince me with a little help from my imagination.
- Biggest pictures go up to 3000 long end, but some, keeping to that amateur theme are much smaller like a cellphone picture, 800 long end.
- Still updating, but the updates are now only once every two weeks, instead of weekly as they were in Duke's TBP review.
- All the models are cute, some stunners like Melanie Rios, quite a few Latinas on this site.
Cons:
- There are only 42 scenes. Of course, you get the network access to offset that, but really think Porn Pros has hit on a niche here that they should be really pushing.
- Some bad camera angles, could add more to the amateur feel, but bad camerawork is frustrating nonetheless.
Bottom Line:
I've seen these "hacked" sites for years, ex-girlfriend revenge, dorm room parties. While it's not really believable that someone hacked someone's social networking site and stole their near HD videos of hardcore sex, which wouldn't be allowed on those sites anyway, I think this one does a good job of making it just believable enough.
Though this site does follow a certain formula in the videos, it's one that we don't see much in porn these days. Every scene I've watched so far starts with the women clothed, trying on clothes, doing all the things us perverted men like to believe goes on, though the pillow fight goes a little far. They have been able to put models on this site that I could see doing these things. As the silliness, which is good in this case, slows, the girls start kissing and you get pretty much a lesbian scene, then a guy shows up and gets in on the fun.
The picture sets take this one further by having the girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror. Flashing each other, these create a real feeling of playfulness when looking at them. Maybe there's a deep concept going on here or maybe they just got lucky by filming it this way, but I did find these scenes to be as believable as any reality scenes in porn.
The bad camera angles are annoying, but I do think they add to the amateur feel of it.
Now, this site gave me fits without a DL manager, I actually downloaded one scene, the newest update, Veronica and Mandy, in all 3 formats, twice each and still didn't get a full download without it breaking. Nearly every scene had 404 file not found on download links through the browser. Once I used a download manager with username and password stored in it, everything downloaded fine and no 404 files.
The videos are an odd 1240x702 resolution, I don't mind that's it not exactly 720p. The selling point here are the pictures that create a realistic feel to the scenes. You're onto something here Porn Pros. The pictures probably have the first 10 minutes of the girls just coming home from a party or clubbing, changing clothes, being frisky with each other, then the video picks up with the action. I like it.
The photos in the mirrors also seem better than your standard, "pose this way" photos on porn sites, since the girls are being silly in them.
The action is generally very good. A few of the models that really shine here are Gigi Rivera, Melanie Rios and Tanner Mayes. Though my favorite scene has Lynn and Ella in it, the Latina one does some serious ride 'em cowboy on the guy. The site has a lot of personality to it.
Though small in size, I've been on sites that have 1,000 videos that I don't keep 42 scenes from, so I think this site was worthy of a review and is one of the reasons that I ended up liking the Porn Pros network.
All very good models, good, fun and original concept with younger, cute models. Can't beat that. Very nice site with a lot of network content to back it up!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Gigi Spice's solo site, comes with access to 8 other sites, including 6 exclusive solo girl sites, one non-exclusive site and the best of the bonus sites La Zona Modelos.
- Gigi's content's quality is a bit mixed, the photos max out at 1200 long end though you can get some of the same sets on Pacino's Adventures in 1600 long end quality. All sets are zipped.
- Videos all have top quality of 1280x720 with 6000+ bitrates. Also have lesser quality smaller video files available.
- Nice mixture on Gigi's content of solo, boy/girl hardcore and girl/girl
- Navigation is simple, click photo or videos and the page opens with thumbs to each set.
- Download speed is a little faster than Pacino's Adventures, reaching roughly 95% of my max DL speed.
- All content on Gigi's site is exclusive to Pacino's network.
- She's about as playful and cute as I've seen from a Latina in porn, speaks English, but usually speaks seductively in Spanish. Great video model.
Cons:
- First problem, part of these videos and picture sets are also available on Pacino's Adventures. Not just a few, but more like 33% of them. Seeing that I joined both this site and Pacino's Adventures at $30 each, it needs to be mentioned.
- As Pink Panther noted, Gigi is not the best photo model, she is great when in action and moving around, but some of her actions just don't translate well in photos like licking her lips in 5 straight shots. Probably is as much the photographer's fault since she seems very open to anything.
- Not for sure if it is really updating. The newest content is also available on Pacino's Adventures so they may just be bringing content from that site to here as new.
Bottom Line:
I want to note that I removed 5 points off the Pacino's Adventures score since one of the major draws for me was Gigi's content and I now find out it is shared with this site. I'm sure it was done to bloat the numbers of this site.
Next problem, though I didn't list it in cons, the videos, not all, but some, are parts. I didn't list in cons since these are very long videos with very high quality. Even in parts, one has 3 parts and each part is 15 minutes at 700 MB for 1 part. So as a whole it would be 45 minutes at 2.1 GB. It does reduce the number of full scenes to, estimating, 60.
The good parts, Gigi is very cute and playful. This really shows in her videos. She is dancing in one before she even realizes she is on the camera, she laughs a lot, smiles, good eye contact with the camera and then there is the dirty talk. She has the nice, sultry Spanish accent and attitude for it as well. Think of a much less annoying Rosie Perez. She is convincing that she really is getting off. There is some squirting in her videos that looks to be of the real variety. More spurt than steady stream. She giggles when she squirts as well. Some seem to even catch her off guard. She'll kind of look at the floor in front of her to make sure she squirted and smile.
The girl/girl content is good as well. She has one with another of Pacino's models where both are masturbating together. She looks to accidentally pee trying to push a squirting orgasm out and just starts cracking up. The look is one that says, "Oh well, already started peeing, might as well finish".
Her boy/girl content with Pacino is also good. There is a lot of serious kissing between them, which makes for more, good, believable videos.
I'm pretty sure the newer updates are from Pacino's Adventures. She has also showed up on a few other glam sites with implants. None of the content here has the implanted boobs. If this site was added to Pacino's Adventures as a bonus site, I would consider that the best Latina deal on the internet. As it is, knowing that 1/3 of this content is available on Pacino's Adventures, it takes away a little from both sites.
Still, very little to complain about when we're talking all videos on Gigi's site being HD. As of right now, I have less than half the content downloaded and am already over 25 GB, so the quality is high as is the focus on the content, Gigi. Pictures could be bigger, while the repetitive photos of the same pose for multiple pictures is a bit annoying, the photos are generally entertaining.
I went into a little more detail on the bonus sites in the Pacino's Adventures review, all are ok with La Zona Modelos standing out as the best of those.
Overall, I see this site as a 1 time join, unless Gigi comes back. It's one of the better solo sites and she's an excellent performer. For fans, a recommended join, if not a fan, I would say try Pacino's Adventures and watch a few of her videos there before joining this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Models feature some of the best known in the business, Sunny Leone, for example, to those unknowns that you wish you knew of!
- Has bonus access to 2 sites Cherry Petite and Squirt 4 Real
- Price is okay for one month join, would prefer to see $19.95 though
- Videos are 720 high end, bitrates need to improve only 1000
- Covers the different styles of porn from the very softcore to very hardcore on Squirt 4 Real
- DL speeds about average.
Cons:
- No zips, I should list that 3 times, maybe the zips would then appear like Candyman?
- Video bitrate of 1000 really is slow when running at 720 resolution.
- The only word I can think of is that the site is somewhat boring. I didn't go back for nearly 2 weeks after my first day of joining.
- Navigation can be annoying, open pictures in new window, close site on accident type annoying.
- The best looking models are either topless at best or not nude at all in underwear.
Bottom Line:
I couldn't help but laugh when on this site. The site looks very professional, but I thought to myself, "That professional look is to tease me so that I will accept the no zips" then when looking at the models, the most beautiful ones were pretty much tease shoots, so I guess they figured those would tease me enough that seeing the less attractive ones nude would be enough.
Quality on the videos is good, 720, but someone is going to have to explain to these sites that the higher the resolution, the higher the bitrate needs to be. 1000 is the bitrate and it seriously chugs along, maybe that is some sort of tease?
The videos on the main site Flashy Babes, could probably get away with a R rating. HBO After Dark type softcore. The videos on Squirt 4 Real are very X rated, not for sure if we still use XXX or not, but I would say XXX.
Besides the no zip problem, the pictures aren't very big, I found a few 1600 high end, but most are in the 1200 range. The videos are there in numbers with around 500, but a lot of them are just the photo shoot style videos.
Of course, on Squirt 4 Real, they only have around 30 videos.
The site that saves this package of sites is Cherry Petite. If you like to see young, very amateur models, this girl is for you. She has a few tattoos that she probably wishes she didn't have. She isn't a glam model at all. Doesn't have any plastic surgery and wears very little make-up. But she is seriously cute, and she does do full masturbation in the videos. She kind of reminds of me of a new Brooke Skye.
I wish they had more content just of her. With photo sets around 70 and the same for videos, her site alone was worth the price for me. Also, the Cherry Petite videos are 720 high end with 2000 bitrates. And those are worth downloading, all of them.
As a package, it is easy to recommend it. You get a full on tease site with Flash Babes, a full on hardcore site with Squirt 4 Real and you get a solo site of a very innocent looking woman that likes to masturbate in front of the camera. Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- TBP Price of $19.95 is very good, includes access to videos.
- Picture size varies from barely acceptable 1000 high end to 2000+ high end and all can be downloaded in zips.
- More content than I realized they would have. I am estimating over 3,500 videos from a site that I thought was more about pictures than videos.
- Download speeds are very good, as I get right at 1,000 kb/s which is a little above average for me.
- Some high end models that I didn't have much content of like Sunny Leone, who I had all but forgotten about
- Some hardcore content as well, which I didn't expect.
Cons:
- Navigation seems to be moody, if that is possible.
- Older picture sets are barely worth the time it takes to download the terribly small 5 meg sets.
- Videos though coming in at 1300 bitrate, 640 high end, really don't look that great.
- Definitely not 100% exclusive content.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that I have debated with myself about joining for over a year.
About once a year, I remember one of my favorite porn stars, Cherie Roberts, aka Kitana Jade, and I had seen where Cherie had some content here on danni.com, and decided it was time to take the chance and join this site.
What I found was pretty good quality pictures, the photography is very good, but some of the older sets are just bad quality/resolution. Well over 1,000 models to choose from, including a lot of the very softcore models like Cherie.
The navigation is if nothing else cumbersome and clumsy. I don't know how many times I clicked something only to get something different than what I clicked. And I hate using the back button on my browser. How hard is it to give me a link to click on to go back?
Anyway, the Cherie content was more of the same, tease, tease, tease, but I did find plenty of content that I liked. The videos have a good blend of softcore, g/g and what I call hardcore masturbation. The women are top-notch, which definitely helps the score out.
The videos are not looking that good on my monitor. I'm not for sure why, as 640 high end usually looks good enough, but still the content in said videos was good enough to keep.
I didn't find any videos that are DRM protected, so that too is a bonus. Having zips with the picture sets does make me feel a little less critical of the small resolution on the old sets too.
Overall though, I would recommend it for a month
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Site from a well-established company, Dev8, that specializes in the highest quality content, you will find
- Newest videos are hitting the very high 1900+ high end resolution with 7000+ bitrates!
- Creampie content is one that I like pretty good, and most of these movies end with one.
- As with other Dev8 sites the videos are very long, some upwards of 45 minutes
- Pictures come zipped in high resolution.
Cons:
- As with other Dev8 sites, the price is a lot for the amount of content, $30 a month for less than 250 videos.
- As with any niche site, the content becomes repetitive after a few weeks.
- The bad F word explains their videos, "Formulaic" they almost all start the same way and of course end the same way.
- My download speeds were slow, which is very unusual for me. I was getting 625 kb/s max and my average is around 1000 kb/s or even a little higher.
Bottom Line:
My first introduction to the Dev8 sites was Give Me Pink, a site I still really like, so I thought I would try out some more of their sites.
All Internal of course is telling you there are going to be creampies. The quality of the newer content is the best I have seen. With 1,900+ resolution on the videos and the super fast 7000+ bitrates, one could only hope they go back and improve the older videos which are down in the 500s on the high end.
Their picture sets are not really something you are going to be that interested in, but they are high resolution with zipped files, and you have to at least give them credit for that, even if you aren't downloading the pictures.
The problems are mostly small ones that I ran into on Give Me Pink as well. Nearly every video looks like the previous one. Some have 1 guy, some have 2, some have 4, but even with those differences, you still can almost count to the second to predict when the clothes come off, when the blowjob stops, when the penetration starts, when the penetration becomes anal.
Because of this, you will most likely face some boredom. Also, I think this takes away from their value because once you are member once, you really don't have much desire to go back again.
My main complaints would be the speed of the download server, and remastering the older videos.
Fix those things and you could add 5 points to the score. Still, I will recommend it because of the gorgeous models, zip pictures and quality!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Network of 13 models' sites, most top tier Euro models.
- Some of the content is different than the content on Teen Dreams
- Videos are nice 2000k bitrate and 640 high end
- Pictures are 1700+ on high end and are downloadable in zips
- Price is about right at $19.95
- Good enough DL speeds, just above average
- Some really great sets that Teen Dreams doesn't have, including what I believe is the newest set of Eve Angel on Sweet Eva, complete with light brown hair, instead of dark brown
Cons:
- Eh, bordering on false advertising, there is some content I haven't seen before, but these sites are no way, no how exclusive, not even close, especially the videos. The ones I have looked up are the same videos as Teen Dreams.
- That I could see none of the models' blogs have anything in them except, "Hi I'm (name), hope you enjoy my pictures and videos" that isn't a blog, that is a computerized greeting.
- Really strange wording on the main page of each model's site. As example, Sweet Peaches says it has 123 exclusive photo sets and 30 movies. It has more like 40 photo sets and 6 movies. Giving them the benefit of a doubt that those numbers are for the whole network, I looked at another Sweet Zuzanna, who is really hot! Anyway, back to my research, it says 182 exclusive photo sets and 47 movies. See what I mean? Those numbers mean nothing from what I can see once inside. Bad practice Teen Dreams.
Bottom Line:
I'm a sucker and knew it when I joined this site. My favorite Eve Angel, has looked to have retired, now I am searching everywhere to find new material of her that I don't have. Sweet Eva is part of this network, so I joined, inside I found 5 never before seen picture sets of Eve, and around 35 sets that are also on Teen Dreams.
You get a lot with this network. I mean, Peaches, Eve, Zuzanna, Tiffany, Irena, Suzie, Lucky, these are all exceptional models, and each one has at least 15 photo sets and 2-4 videos, some have more videos, Zuzanna, I believe has 10. It just seems like Teen Dreams duped me though. As a longtime fan of Teen Dreams, I was expecting more than just a handful of new photo sets from each of these sites. I have an active membership with TD right now, so most of these sets are already there.
I will be fair and say that the quality is good, nice bitrate of 2000 on the movies and 1700 on high end of pictures, zips, the sites work just like Teen Dreams does. It is just that one ounce of frustration that stops me from rating this network higher. If you have never joined Teen Dreams, and these models are your favorites, then it is worth it since these sites have most or all of their TD content plus a handful of extra sets.
I won't join it again unless they start adding more exclusive sets. The Lucky site was the best of the bunch, since I hadn't downloaded any of her TD material. So, recommended, but you have been warned about the overlapping content!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the most beautiful models I have seen on the internet
- Quality on videos is good enough, 600 on high end, but a nice near 2000 bitrate helps out
- The site as a whole has a pretty classy feel for the most part, it has almost what I would call, playful curiousity from the girls.
- The pictures look nice, but see cons
- Download speeds are blazing for me, nearly 1,400kb/s
- Original models, or at least most are for me. Some are known porn stars, but I'm guessing maybe 25% are amateurs.
- Funny comments from Thomas, though he does get boring after awhile, reminds me a lot of Dream Stash in that sense.
Cons:
- Price, $33 is just too much, it should be at most $24.95.
- Pictures are barely reaching 1000 on high end and cannot be downloaded in zip files.
- Thomas, as funny as he is at times, he seems to be stuck on the same joke from clip to clip.
- Sex is like Sex by Numbers, nearly every scene follows the exact same pattern, and combined with Thomas' repetitive humor, the site itself becomes repetitive
- The big one, split movie scenes on older videos. I am at the point that I won't even download these unless it is a favorite actress of mine.
Bottom Line:
This site wowed me right off the bat with the gorgeous models. The site also has a modern look to it, and overall, has a classy look and feel to it.
Then there is the content. Sex, blowjobs, and cum in mouth which is swallowed. Everytime. No body cumshots, just right in the mouth and on the face. I'm not a big fan of facials, so this becomes repetitive very fast. Still, the models are gorgeous and they will keep you coming back.
The pictures are disappointing, such gorgeous women, but no hi-res and no downloadable zips? It makes the pictures virtually useless. The video quality is good enough at 600 high end, near 2000 bitrate, but then there are those split scenes, which are also all but useless to me. I have a strange time with the videos as well. For some reason they are letterboxing on my monitor, not for sure why, but that looks odd and makes me click on the letterbox hoping it will go away.
The site still has some models that make it worth joining. It kind of makes you feel like you are on a date with a woman that is out of your league, but you keep spending money on her. The only real cons are the repititive nature of the videos. By the 3rd one, I knew what was going to happen and when. I keep coming back to how beautiful the models are though, and that should be stressed as the #1 Pro that outweighs all of cons. The preview is pretty good, check it out and see if the models catch your eyes like mine, then for one month only it is highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of content, upwards of 3,000 picture sets and 1,000 videos
- Many known pornstars before they were stars, many amateurs that I wish went on to a career in porn as well.
- Though quality on picture sets does vary, all sets are available in zips
- Exclusive content
- New site design from when I was a member a few months ago, download speeds have increased for me.
- Great TBP price of $14.95
Cons:
- Video quality could be improved, but I like this site for the exclusive pictures moreso than the videos.
- Picture quality could be better, but it is advertised as amateur site, so it isn't that bad.
- Not a lot of hardcore
- Older sets have a quality dropoff from new sets
Bottom Line:
Matt's Models reminds me a lot of the ATK sites. If you're here just for the videos, you probably won't like it as much. One of my favorite parts of the site is the "before they were stars" content. My original reason for joining was to get some really great older content of Eva Angelina, pre-implants, with glasses too. Just a few other recognizable models are Erica Campbell, Shay Laren and a personal favorite Addisson Rose.
Looking through the more amateur models that have yet to go pro, or for that matter, may never go pro, adds value to the site since some of these girls haven't been seen before. Cassandra Colegra is another favorite here, she has her own site now, but isn't as well known as most pro models.
Picture quality can throw you off some. I've downloaded different sets from different years and overall, I would call the resolution average just above average for the entire site. The newer sets are better, as expected. The videos I have downloaded are around 500 on the high end of the resolution scale, downloadable in full scenes, which is a plus over the aforementioned ATK sites.
Overall, this isn't a site that I would tell a new porn customer to check out. I get a lot out of this site, because they have plenty of material from some of my favorites, but it still isn't a site to introduce someone to online porn with. On the other hand, if you've never tried Matt's, I would give it a recommendation, especially with the $14.95 price. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting network that I stumbled upon about 10 days ago on TBP, great price from TBP $12.95 for 9 sites.
- One of the first networks I have seen that has mostly Euro content
- Videos vary depending on which site, but go as high as 740 on high end, lowest high number that I have seen is 400.
- Some fetish content here, newly "married" white women having sex with black men while their husband watches
- Contains 4 solo sites as well, see BL
Cons:
- Photos aren't very good, not terrible, but no zips just leaves me frustrated.
- You might have trouble figuring out how to login at first, instead of going to the main page to sign in, you just go to each site and do it. No login option on network's main page.
- Really isn't that big considering it is 9 sites, each site has on average 30 videos
- Brides on Blacks has no downloads on movies!
Bottom Line:
First and foremost, this network is an excellent value for the price. This is my 3rd or 4th of these discounted networks and this is the first I've fooled with reviewing. I will have a few of the sites reviewed as well since I was impressed.
First, you get two fetish sites, one is married white women having sex with black men in front of their husbands, the videos are not downloadable only on this one site. Then there is one about MILFs, very similar to the previous one, these are supposed to be moms who are cheating on their husbands. Both are solid sites with good quality, just not a lot of content. There is also a small but very hot moms site called Moms Online.
Tasty Crisa for you big boob lovers 36FF, not my thing though, so I skipped it. Tasty Julie, a little small brunette goth model, pretty sexy, but still not that great. Next though is Tasty Gina, you've seen her on many Euro sites, gorgeous Euro and the videos are full masturbation of her. Then there is Tasty Tara, I knew her by a couple of other names, she has a dolphin tattoo right above her pubic area. Very sexy Euro. Each of these have between 20-30 videos and similar or more photo sets, but no zips! Damn it! Please start adding zips!
Last is Tasty Dildos and Tasty 18&19 which is like most solo masturbation sites. Here is what sold me, Stracy Stone is on this network in a few videos and Eufrat in a b/g scene! I'm going to have to do a comment to finish this. Recommended!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A full network review, has 12 sites, every fetish you can imagine is here!
- Videos on the sites are 640 on high end and for the most part are very good and there are lots of videos up
- Pictures are available on each of the sites, some run a little below 1200, others towards 1500, but all do come in zips and most sets are huge!
- Most of the sites have some really beautiful women on them
- Definitely an original network, it is unlike any network you can join
Cons:
- Price for the entire network is around $55 for a month.
- We complain about the overuse of female models, well, these sites have about 12 guys that cover all of them from what I can see
- As with any fetish site, the content will always be repetitive after a while.
- The language is not one of 4 that I speak or understand, kind of hurts the content since I didn't get some of the fetishes, with no talking, I am lost
Bottom Line:
The score for the whole network is definitely a sum of it. Overall, the network delivers tons of fetish content. The only thing I didn't find was the really obscure fetishes like Roman Showers, which would have pissed me off if I had paid for to see!
The other sites beside the 3 top ones I reviewed separately are your typical fetishes, peeing, cumshots, 3 separate orgy sites and then the ones I ended up liking the most, the clothed sex sites. This was a whole new fetish to me. Men and women, having sex, fully clothed. I found it interesting and even erotic. What you end up with is a site that reminds you of those high school sneak overs to your girlfriend's house. She slides her shorts over, you unzip your pants and you get the picture. It also makes for a messy situation since half the time the guy cums on the woman's clothes.
Which I hear is also a fetish. This site makes me look at many things differently, I now think everyone has a closet full of fetishes!
Overall, as a network, it delivers what it promises. You get some hardcore sex with the orgy sites, you get fetish, it really is a quality network. The price is still a problem for me. I can join 2-3 sites for the price of this network. Several of these separate sites could be combined, like the orgy sites and the two cumshot sites.
I'm going to recommend the entire network only, and only if you don't mind paying the high price. It has a great preview with trailers as well. For me, one month was enough.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 22 sites, my picks are Teen Brazil, College Fuck Fest, Bikini Banger, Border Banger and Yank My Crank
- Great humor in many of the clips, including a hilarious Speedy Gonzalez reference in Border Bangers, "Arriba, Andale!"
- Video quality is above 640 in most cases which is impressive for a network of 22 sites.
- I think it is mostly exclusive, I don't recognize the material
- Most of the sites update a few times per week
Cons:
- Humor in porn can be a bad thing at times.
- Very few pictures, and the ones that are there are poor quality.
- I'm not into anal, so several of the sites are of no use to me, also a tranny site that is of no use.
- Two of the best sites for me, Teen Brazil and Border Bangers need more content!
Bottom Line:
My love of Brazilian women pulled me to this site after seeing Apoctom's review of it. The Brazil Teen site was enough for me, but Border Bangers also had some good clips as did Bikini Banger, Yank My Crank and College Fuck Fest.
The network reminds me of Ox Pass. The humor in the sites was worth 3 points in my review, so if you don't like humor in your porn, knock off 3 points. I couldn't help but laugh when on a Boarder Banger video, the guy tells the girl, "This is how they came up with the idea of putting a burrito inside a taco" that is good humor. I will take the humor over spitting in the model's faces or grabbing their throats anyday.
I was happily surprised at the video quality for a network. I actually let my bill recur since I had been out of town the last week. I wanted to explore the other sites more in-depth. I downloaded all material in Brazil Teen and Border Bangers and will be keeping all of it, it has been nothing but quality in those videos.
I guess the lack of decent pictures is a knock. Also useless sites for me, but I don't knock much off for those since I know some people like anal sites. Overall, it is a very good network, I think they could lower the price a little, maybe $5 to $10 off. I would recommend it based just on the five sites I listed in pros, as the content I have gotten from those sites is above average quality. Plus, they do update which some networks rarely do. Definitely recommend for Brazilian fans!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Probably the largest network of porn on the internet, well over 100 sites!
- Has several dozen sites that are shooting their own material, some come off as solid quality amateur porn movies
- I would imagine that most niches are covered, Latina, BJ, Handjobs, Interracial up to extreme porn
- Navigation is surprisingly very easy to use for such a huge network.
- Will be a con also, some videos are excellent quality 640 on the high end
Cons:
- To start with some videos are 340 on the high end.
- Too much content, is that possible?
- Video formats also vary from clip to clip, one will be .avi, next will be .wmv, you have no options on format.
- Some sites I wouldn't have interest in, including gay and tranny.
- Like most networks, could cram 3-4 of these sites together into 1 site. Full sites with 25 videos for example.
Bottom Line:
My interest in this network came from my talked about handjob loving wife. They have a an entire handjob network on this network. There is one site that has user submissions of videos that I have never seen and one site is called Rookie Handjobs, never seen any of the clips. The network is overwhelming and it isn't cheap at $29.99. The navigation is very easy for a network, you just click on the main page, it lists niche, you click on which one you like, then the sites come up in that niche, click on the site and you are there. Nothing hard or frustrating about it. It looks to be a well maintained network as well with new updates across the network, I can't keep up with all of them, but they do have a link to show all new updates.
I was happily surprised to see a site I had never heard of that has what looks to be real amateur content. The only star I have seen is Kayla Marie in one video, the rest are all new to me. The video quality is frustrating, when you download one clip that is 10 minutes long but only 20 megs, you know it isn't going to be real good quality, but the next one will be 10 minutes long and 150 megs. Still I consider this network a breath of fresh air, especially if you like handjob porn that also has plenty of oral in it as well. Those sites alone have over 400 handjob clips. Not for sure why TBP hadn't assigned it yet, maybe it is too large to give a fair review to?
I will recommend it if you do the preview first, it is a great preview too!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The standard DVD quality resolution on the movies 640 x 480.
- Has probably the most unique search engine I've used for porn, is excellent once you figure out (will explain in bottom line)
- Also has a unique pricing plan where you pay $9.95 per month for unlimited or buy tokens for $.99 each. One token buys a full scene, 3 tokens buys a full movie
- Nice trial with 5 free tokens, no obligation
- Starting to see some DVDs that I haven't seen!
Cons:
- Site is still relatively new, 865 DVDs as of right now.
- Sort of a con, will send emails after you join via trial, but the emails are actually nice with update information about once a month.
- Site doesn't work in Firefox
Bottom Line:
You have to give them credit for trying something different. The payment system alone is one of the first I've seen like this one. Say you go by and see one particular DVD you have been looking for. You can pay $2.99 to get 3 tokens and download just it without a monthly recurring payment. Or you can pay the $9.99 and get unlimited downloads for a month.
The search engine may be used on some sites, but I've never seen one like it. You pick a type of female like Asian/Euro/Black, it brings all of those up. You then can browse the selections you picked, then you can search within say Euro females with attributes of scene, lesbian/boy and girl/blowjob, say you select Euro on the first, then boy/girl on the second, then you can go to next step in the search which is scene type, some options Orgy/Cumshot etc..
The video quality is right along the lines of the "DVD quality" on Videobox and there are some movies I haven't seen on other sites which is what made me decide to try a month membership out.
It wouldn't surprise me if this site ends up being a top site in a year or so. They are adding around 75 DVDs per month, a little over 2 per day on average, and the unique/easy search will surely help as will the free trial that is better than any trial I've seen. It was enough from 2 months ago, to get me to come back and pay $10 for a month, and I will be back a few months from now to re-join at the $10 price to see what new content they have. Recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Network access, plays several fetishes (In school, at work, etc..) all for the most part are centered around big breasts.
- Above average video quality, available in WMV or MPEG, WMV 640x480.
- No download limits, I mention this because another network with similar content had a 2GB download limit the last time I was on it.
- Pic sets are much nicer than most networks, huge zips with over 250 pics in each.
- Exclusive content
Cons:
- Eh, they call these models amateurs, but you will see Eva Angelina, Chavon Taylor, Carmella Bing and put it this way, there are many more non-amateurs than amateurs.
- I may get a little flack for this, but a good portion of the big boobs are fake.
- Like most networks they could squeeze some of these sites together.
Bottom Line:
I really liked Brazzers, I'm not even a big boob man. But they do have a couple of big ass sites, and that is more up my alley. My only real complaint is that most of the scenes feel like I've seen them before. I know I haven't, but like the Eva Angelina school scene, she has been in probably 3-4 scenes in school, with a little short plaid skirt and her cute glasses. Don't get me wrong, I could look at her like that all day, but my point being, though the content is exclusive and new, it isn't near being original.
Overall, the network has probably 7 sites that I really liked, the rest were mostly focusing on the big boobage. Though I do find Chavon Taylor very sexy. It has more potential, I believe, than the other reality networks do, because they don't go all out and try to convince you it is real.
I am pleased with the quality, 640x480 on the WMV, nice download speeds, probably reaches about 90% of my max download speed. I was surprised by the pictures coming in zips of 250 or more pictures. Sometimes looking at the pictures right before viewing a clip, it will help you notice something you might not pay attention to otherwise.
The price is good, $24.99, they seem like a group of fun loving guys, kind of like on Ox Pass. Which matters some since I will flip if I see another male pornstar spit on a female pornstar. Eva's scenes are excellent, some of her best work, and from what I know she does the best when having fun. I recommend, especially for boobs fans!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Slightly better quality on highest videos than videobox
- Great TBP price $14.99
- Large collection, over 1800 DVDs
- Has some DVDs that I haven't seen elsewhere including 6 or 7 21 Sextury DVDs
- Navigation is almost as easy videobox, but not quite, still a very easy site to use.
Cons:
- Niche/categories that won't interest some, gay, tranny
- A good portion of the DVDs, probably 50% or more come off as low budget, b-grade porn.
Bottom Line:
I had a couple of reasons to join this site, they have three of the "My Dear" series from 21st sextury, My Dear Sandy, then Anetta Keys and the Sophie Moone. Each of those have 6-8 solo clips of each woman in them. Also had a few other 21st Sextury DVDs, those are $24.95 if I'm not mistaken when bought separately. And feature some of my favorite top 10 models.
They also had 5 Eva Angelina clips that I don't have, and neither videobox or pornstarxs have. I got my money worth just on the 21st Sextury and Eva Angelina clips, but I'm sure I will pick up some more over the next week or so. The site looks good, the navigation uses niche or search by name, so there is nothing to complain about there.
A nice feature that more and more video sites are offering as does DVD box, is to let you look at what all they have before joining. The quality on the videos is slightly above standard DVD res, 700. They also have smaller clips which are much smaller. On one I was testing to see what the content of the clip was, the smaller version was 13.8 MB, the large version was 109 MB.
Not for sure about customer service, haven't had to use it yet, but they do have an online survey that asks for recommendations and 8 questions. Site updates 2 new DVDs per day, and you can check the coming soon section to see the next 7-8 DVDs, which is nice. It lets you see if you have reason to hold onto another month's membership or cancel and come back later. Recommended!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Lots of content, most genres are covered
- Pretty nice guys running the site, usually will answer emails and even hold a discussion with you about their site and women.
- Nice mix of women, blondes, brunettes, white girls, Hispanic girls, black girls.
- Very hardcore
- Wheels on the bus go round and round, members know what I am talking about the world famous Bang Bus site is part of the network
Cons:
- I can't think of his name that is doing the talking in most of the videos, but he can get on your nerves at times.
- Scenes are repetitive
- Some of the girls do not look to be enjoying themselves
Bottom Line:
This is a very fun site to be a member of. You can send an email in, get response, then end up having a porn discussion with the guys who run it. Ball Honeys, Bang Bus and Ass Parade are all excellent sites on this network, I think each of those could nearly stand on their own. The others, Tugjobs, Big Mouthfuls and the two big boobs ones aren't real interesting to me. I'm more of a butt and legs type.
I sent an email in last year and mentioned the humor in their scenes. Though I am not really into facials, I used to crack up when I would see a Bang Bus episode. The guy would be about to cum, the girl would start blowing him, the narrator would say, "Sing it!" The girl while blowing the guy would hum and sing, "Wheels on the Bus go Round and Round". Most of the girls would even end up laughing.
Everything on the network is well above average quality, though the pictures are not as good as the videos. Most of the newer Ball Honey clips were over 500 megs to download because of the high quality. Ball Honeys and Ass Parade are two of the better sites on the internet, Bang Bus is fun for the novelty and satire of the scenes. There was one clip when the guy that talks starts laughing when he "picks up" the woman. The reason, most of the women over-act. They look shocked and say, "No, I'm not getting in the Bus!" Take it as a Lighter Side of Porn.
I recommend it for those who like very curvy women. If you like curvy, but not too curvy women, this is a site for you!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Viv is the master of "leg" sex
- Can now double up on his sites for $10 more
- Viv is very passionate about his photography and videography, it shows.
- All of the big Euro stars are here, some have 10+ videos
- Viv's lesbian scenes are some of the most believable and sensual you will ever see
Cons:
- Didn't realize you could get both his photo site and video site for only $10 more, so I ended up paying full subscription price for each.
- The video quality could be improved
Bottom Line:
You know by now that I have the worst crush ever on Eve Angel. I had heard from Eve's own site that she was doing some new shoots with Viv, so that is how I found his site.
These videos for the most part are excellent. This includes some very rare b/g scenes with some of Europe's biggest stars. He has more Eve b/g than I even knew existed. The site is fairly easy to use as well. Everything is easily found with drop down menus.
What is leg sex? I've heard different definitions, but I know that way back in 1995, Viv was making movies called Leg Sex. My understanding is that it focuses on the sensual parts, usually wearing stockings or hose, heels, lots of touching and most of all right here on his site are the Art of Kissing videos. Hardcore fans don't look at me like I am crazy! Peaches and Eve Angel have a 15 minute Art of Kissing clip that is possibly the sexiest thing I have ever watched.
Several times in said clip, you can see the girls reaching to touch each other, but it is just supposed to be kissing. I'm not for sure how many total Art of Kissing videos there are, but there are more than this one. I kind of was stuck in shock after watching the Eve and Peaches one. The site has oral b/g, oral g/g, straight sex, solo, put it this way, it has much more variety than I expected from a very famous photographer. I was expecting something very softcore and artsy. What a great surprise. A better preview would help. I highly recommend this site.
Follow-Up:
Total of 7 point drop over the last 6-9 months, quaity remains average, while price reaches near $40 level. This is a shame since Viv's content is some of the best you will find, but I have a feeling, my joins will become once a year max now.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- They weren’t kidding when they said porn stars are like one big family. This is a big stepfamily site.
- A 768 scene site but those interview videos are counting for some of those. It’s not updating.
- Nice photosets that you can download. Those are not as good on this site. The resolution is lower but at least they have them.
- My download speeds on this network have been consistently over 90% of my max.
- Familiar models both males and females, these are professionals on the highest level. There are pros and cons to that.
- They do a pretty good job of making a believable stepfamily site. I don’t really see that as a pro. I believe if the producers turned the models loose and did some adlib with this niche, they would have better scenes.
Cons:
- It’s not updating. I hadn’t seen this site before.
- This is a niche that I am going to say the females should be amateurs and the males should be professionals. I think it would be a lot better. You would be adding that element of the female possibly really feeling some taboo as she starts to have sex with a pro. The chemistry would be better. Two pros or three pros, you’re going to get a standard porn scene no matter what you do with the story.
Bottom Line:
I was not aware of this site, and I even reviewed a New Sensations site (Tabu Tales) that has this niche. I thought this was the newer version. Instead, this is a much older site. I mentioned the newer design of the network makes everything look new to me since I hadn’t been a member in over 10 years. This site has 768 scenes, and the oldest scenes are from 2014, the newest ones say 2016. That tells you how many interview videos they’ve slipped in to cushion those numbers.
The scenes are long. I have watched two that were over an hour. They are going for a more realistic approach to stepfamily porn. I have to think that sex with a stepsibling is as realistic as sex with someone you’re not blood-related to. Sarcasm snuck in. I’m not going to be that hard on the site for trying a more realistic approach to it. I have said before I don’t have any stepsiblings. I did many years ago, but I never met them. I think porn is trying too hard with this niche. That’s why I prefer this niche to be silly and funny. They’re not related! There’s no taboo. That’s why the serious, realistic side of this niche doesn’t do well with me.
With all that said, his is good, professional sex and porn. Most of the models are pretty. The highest video download resolution on any of these is 4K (edited in, I first thought it was 1080p). They are smart at New Sensations. They have Brandi Love in some of the cougar roles. She makes scenes a lot better than they are. It’s not just her look. She has an energy in her scenes that you don’t see with a lot of models. I know Nicole Aniston had that too. The titles reach a level of perversion that the scenes really don’t, “It’s OK, Bailey won’t tell on daddy” or “Little Carolina can keep a secret”. That shows the trying too hard part. That usually means the action won’t be that good. These scenes are.
That is something I talked about in a previous review of a New Sensations site. It’s like being on Videobox. You're going to have to dig through these scenes to find the good ones. I would say the worst scenes on it are okay for porn. That’s the feeling I am getting with New Sensations again. As long as it’s good enough, that’s enough. That then leaves it up to the model to make the scene really good.
The technical parts are good enough. I don’t know what happened with the photos on this site. Some are high resolution, others aren’t. I’m also seeing that some of these videos have 4K. That tells me their list by newest may not be right. The newest scene doesn’t have 4K. They do give you alternate bitrates for the 720p and 1080p downloads, that’s a nice touch. From what I have seen the higher bitrates are much clearer on larger monitors than their resolution leads you to believe. A 480p video with a high bitrate looks good in full screen mode on a 1080p screen.
It's hard to say it’s a bad site. There are too many good scenes on it to say that. You just have to find them. It does look like this site is a DVD dump for them. They just loaded the scenes up and dropped 350 one year and 350 the next. These are from their DVDs.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It could probably just be called MILF porn. Very attractive 30-40 year old women having sex.
- It’s a large site with 466 videos and 364 models.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Was updating with 4K scenes up until July 2020, now are starting to update with remasters
- Epoch is the biller.
- Very good photosets for a site like this and are downloadable.
Cons:
- It may be a little too vanilla for some. Some of these scenes are supposed to be a wife and her husband. There’s no stepfamily, paying the plumber twist to the scenes.
- The ads can be annoying since they look like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You can just imagine a group of porn producers are sitting around and one says, “What if we just shot normal porn?” That’s what you get on this site. I believe that is its biggest selling point and its biggest weakness. It’s not heartcore or lovey porn. I don’t think real couples just have mushy sex. They don’t on this site either. There’s anal and swallowing, all kinds of real kinks you don’t know your next door neighbor does or your sister does.
Which is also a problem since this doesn’t look like porn to me. It looks like I found someone’s home video stash of them having sex with their spouse. It really makes you think or it does me. I honestly thought the name of the site was “Housewife Next Door” and kind of wish it was. I’ll give an example, I think they’re going for the feeling of you being married to the female. Gianna Dior has a very good scene on here but if I was married to her we would be doing some pubic hair trimming on her. That’s why I don’t think porn like this works. If you’re going to try and put the viewer in the role of the man in the scene then you need to let the viewer select what’s going to happen in the scene. I think ATK Girlfriends does the best job of creating the “this is your girlfriend” porn scenes. It’s not to say this site is bad. I’m just saying they could do more with this niche. The Gianna scene to show what they’re going for is titled, “Your wife Gianna fucks your cock”.
The pictures are very good. It’s rare to find a site/network that is known for hardcore sex but turns around and gives you what is very close to a legitimate photoshoot. They do this on several of their sites and I think it should be mentioned.
You also get very good technical quality. The videos since 2014 have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a few smaller ones to download. They also have a few shorter versions you can download of each scene. The photos are downloadable in zips. The site is a good-sized site with nearly 500 scenes.
I just get hung up on what I call philosophical differences. A lot of the scenes have POV use of the camera to make you feel like you’re part of the scene. Which hasn’t ever worked for me but it shows their goal with this site. I will compliment something I usually don’t, at least not recently, the houses, the settings, do add to the believable part of the scenes. I do like that they don’t film every scene in the bedroom. There are living room couch scenes, on the floor, in the kitchen and that too adds realism. I think I’m just so used to some crazy storyline that this type of porn just reminds me of real life. I still like my porn to be more fantasy than realistic. I’m sure there are people that prefer realistic and if so, you should check this site out.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I have always liked Gloryhole scenes and honestly didn’t realize this site is on the same network as Gloryhole.com.
- They do something on this site that I like and that is the opposite of the better-known Gloryhole.com site, they have a lot of black girls with white guys.
- It also surprised me that they have 341 scenes. The updating is still happening but it looks like they are inconsistent with it. There were two new updates in October 2020.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max)
- Navigation on the site is good as well as the network being easy to switch from site to site.
- They use Epoch as the biller and usually will offer you a discounted price when you go to cancel.
Cons:
- The older scenes have 480p as the largest downloadable file.
- I think some of these women are amateurs and they look like women you could find in a truck stop bathroom. Maybe that should be a pro since it’s believable?
Bottom Line:
Many years ago, I was in undergraduate school (late 90s) and I remember some of the students warning about the public restrooms on campus. I hadn’t ever heard of a gloryhole but that’s what they were calling it back then too. The difference being, the ones doing the pleasuring were older, male professors. I can remember other students saying, “Life is like a gloryhole, you stick your dick in it and never know what you’re going to get.”
I guess the appeal of seeing mostly attractive women being what you get on the other side of the gloryhole has always intrigued me. I think the politically correct television show, “What would you do?” should set up some gloryholes and see how women respond to a dick popping through a hole in the bathroom stall.
There’s very little difference from scene to scene. There are some scenes that turn into sex through the gloryhole instead of just a blowjob. I think it took the gloryhole sites a few years to realize they could pull off sex. I can see a producer having that Eureka moment. The negative with the ones that turn into sex is the camera angle. You either get the side view which only shows the penetration if they woman is flexible enough to lift her leg high enough for you to see or you get the down under camera angle that’s looking up at the sex. That angle sometimes takes a few seconds to realize what you’re looking at. I do think the niche is starting to wear thin. Maybe there’s a new twist they could throw on it?
You do get a large collection here with 341 scenes. Besides videos they do offer downloadable zipped photo sets. The technical quality does have a few problems. The older scenes only offer 480p as the largest download option and the newer scenes have the $4 per 4K scene option if you want 4K. The quality varies over the years with most of the scenes at least offering 720p and the newer ones having 720p and 1080p.
The best part to me is a lot of the newer scenes have a black woman with a white man. The older scenes didn’t incorporate that version of interracial. It is an underrepresented niche in porn as far as I’m concerned. As I say that, the network itself has a site listed as new called, We Fuck Black Girls.
I do think this site is only good for those into gloryhole/voyeur type sites. Most of the women do a good job of making it believable that they are really into the scenes. It’s another site I don’t think could stand on its own but as part of a large network it’s a nice site worth checking out.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Loosely described "matures" site.
- 396 scenes
- Updates twice per month.
- Segpay is the biller.
- High quality site, videos, photos and features.
- Very good (85% of max) download speeds.
- Just over 200 models, some have as many as 14 scenes.
- Everything is downloadable and I haven't hit any limits.
Cons:
- Either I'm getting older or these mature models are getting younger. A lot of the models don't look much over 25. Not really a con unless you're really into much older women which I'm not.
- Not a con for me, but none of the videos have 4K.
- Borders on cookie cutter. Being a premium site I expect a little more in the production values.
Bottom Line:
This is a tough site to review. They have a nice selection of models (Ava Addams, Anissa Kate, and it wouldn't be a mature site without 14 scenes of Brandi Love). They play into several of the more popular niches (stepfamily, older/younger), but they hurt themselves in my opinion.
The site is marketed as a premium site separate from but ran by Porn Pros. Most of these sites have 4K videos. I could have missed a few but I haven't seen any 4K videos on this site.
That's not a big deal to me but what makes it premium? The two age groups that cause the most frustration for me as a porn viewer are the teen and mature groups. The teen ones you will see this near perfect model and she either overacts or under performs (shyness, not used to being submissive), while the matures have models that are bored or look like they have been here a thousand times before.
I get that feeling with a lot of these models even though I don't even know some of them. I would rate most of them as A or B in presentation and D or F in effort.
Of course that's not talking about all of them. Brandi Love puts on her usual top-level performances, India Summer has a scene that is really good and the site is relatively large, with nearly 400 scenes, as a standalone site.
The technical side of things is good, nothing more or less. The oldest videos have a 1080p, 720p and 480p download option, some of the older scenes do not have photos but do have screencaps. The newest videos have the same download options except with higher bitrates.
That's a word I don't like using with a premium site ... inconsistency. Some have pictures, some don't. Some have low bitrates, others have too high of bitrates. Some of the models give very good performances, some are very poor. There's very little middle ground here.
There are better mature sites, maybe it's just me but these older models should at least be able to give a decent acting performance. See Brandi Love for example. I find her attractive but she isn't near the look I prefer. Her performances make her scenes worth looking over that part.
It's an easy site to navigate. If you like the models it would be worth joining. Otherwise, it is hard to really recommend this site as there are better sites out there in the same niche.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
