Heck, at this rate, I can probably cook a meal, eat it, sleep, go to work, take a weekend getaway and it will be still be trying to cancel! I really hate to be this negative with a site that seems to work hard on delivering what they promise their site has, but it's getting harder by the day.
Getting ready to reply to their webmaster below because I opened a support ticket on Monday morning. The cancel option takes you directly to the open a support ticket area now, but here it is 5 PM EST on Tuesday and I have yet to receive a ticket #, check both email inbox and spam box. This ticket # is required to access their reply to my ticket. The only thing that's stopping me from being too infuriated is that the subscription still has 10-11 days on it, so surely they will get something worked out by then. If the problem persists the scoring will continue to go down.
Edit: Just wanted to edit to say the webmaster helped me get canceled, but will leave the rest of the comment in case it happens to a future member so they can reference it.
Going to take a few points off my review for the frustrating cancellation process. Here's the steps and mind you, I still have NOT been able to cancel my account.
First, they have four different billing processors, netbilling, ccbill, epoch and netcash. I don't know if certain ones are used based on the country you are in, but my account was processed by netbilling, who I have used a time or two in the past.
In my subscription confirmation email there is no link to cancel. I go to netbilling's homepage, have a member ID, but there is nowhere on netbilling's homepage to cancel. Went to Yanks support, clicked "cancel" it asked which biller I used. Clicked on netbilling. It tells me to put my username and password in. I do this and click "cancel account".
Well, the browser sits there with a working spinner going, "Connecting..." I go outside, take the trash out, come back and still is working and saying, "connecting". It finally pops up and says, "Cannot find account". I'll never understand why a biller gives a customer a "member ID number" but doesn't have a place to enter that when canceling.
I'll never understand why a site would hire a biller that doesn't allow direct cancel on the biller's homepage. You're just asking for dissatisfied customers.
And this is not just a one-time thing. I've tried it 3 nights in a row. There is an option to email the site's support with any cancellation problems, so I guess I'm going to have to do that. Whether fast reply or not, I don't think I should have to email the site to cancel when they have a cancellation system in place. It goes back to, I didn't have to email the site to JOIN the site so why should I have to email the site to cancel it? Go back to my review and see the part about my main frustration with the site itself being that it could be much better than it is if some time and effort was put into updating the way the site itself works. Looks like that carried right over into the billing too.
And here I was thinking I would never use 5,000 character limit, but ended up cutting a line or two out just to fit everything in. I at least wanted to get something up for anyone that maybe wants to try it out. The expired reviews seemed to be before they merged their sites together so it made a huge difference in the amount of content.
The male site worked for me since my wife likes porn too, but not the real hardcore sets. She did say the videos she watched were okay, but said the camera was too far away in them, in her words, "making the dicks all look tiny". I think from reading the forum on their site that's kind of what they were aiming for by having a male and female site. A few sites have tried this in the past that I can remember. Though I do want to mention that I still don't know what all I have access to. Things become really confusing once away from the Yanks main site since they list "our sites" but have a "join" page on them. It could just be that the sites are older in design and require a join verification instead of going straight to them, but it's confusing nonetheless.
I wasn't for sure I wanted Golden Girls to be too believable! I remember really liking the show, but don't remember too much arousal factor. The one I noticed most was That 70s Show since I always thought Mila Kunis was really sexy and it looks like they pulled it off pretty well. Really, I'm surprised more sites don't try the celebrity look-a-like sets more often.
I tried it out, but not getting the offer. The only options I got besides the standard join is to join for long-term. The worst part, I never can get my card approved through their billing system so it ends up sending me to ccbill. Maybe I'll send them an email and ask what's going on with both problems. I wouldn't have ever complained about it if Angels updated more frequently. I still really like their content, but my subscriptions have dropped off since I usually prefer Angels. At one time, maybe 2007, I was joining both about every 3 months. As of right now, I don't think I've been a member this year of either. Just like Monahan's post below shows.
Very good review RearAdmiral. I've been a big fan of both ALS sites for a good while. The main thing I'm going to comment on is the ALS Angels site being available for $9.95 with ALS Scan. This originally was the only major problem I had with the ALS sites.
The difference between the two. ALS Angels are models, ALS' webmaster Alex felt were "too curvy" for ALS Scan. If he has made Angels available for $9.95 to Scan members then I probably wouldn't complain too much, but for years, including up to the last membership I had, Scan was $29.95, Angels was $24.95 no matter whether you joined them both or not and it had me almost saying "scam". Various reasons for it, my favorite Euro model, Eve Angel is on Angels only, she is listed as 5'6" 115. not really for sure on what world a 115 pound woman is "too curvy". I think my most recent reviews of the two scored Angels higher than Scan just because I preferred the models, though Angels only updates 7-10 times a month, compared to Scan's much more frequent updates.
It became such a frustrating point for me that I stopped joining either site. Don't remember how I exactly worded it, either in a review or comment, but at one point, it cost nearly $55 to join both and the only bonus from joining both was receiving all the models all other sites offer for one price. This became more frustrating when I signed up for both sites with the same username/password and sure enough, they were going through the same server. I think I've even posted I would be willing to join both for $39.95 combo price, so it at least shows how much I liked the content. I'll have to make a note to join both if Alex keeps giving a discount to Angels for Scan members.
A model I had found on a very few sites, Sasha Bleu, seems to go by several variations of aliases, all starting with Sasha. I've seen several preview sets of her that have this Naughty Mag watermark on them. I'm not real familiar with the Score Group except that I know they usually are focused on big boobs. TBP review looks pretty good on it, but no recent reviews or comments, so I'm just curious if anyone has tried it recently. Not being a huge fan of big boobs, I don't know if it's worth a membership just to get the Sasha content or not.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-12-1106:49pm (Update History) Reason: Problems with canceling
Pros:
- A site based around mostly amateurs, the female orgasm and real masturbation. As a plus, if you have a wife or girlfriend, that likes porn, you also get access to their site that is focused on male masturbation.
- Price is good through TBP
- Newer videos are 1280x720, will further this in BL
- Newer pictures are near 3000 long end and come zipped.
- Taking a shot at around 400 models, surprisingly, for an amateur site, nearly all the women are attractive. I think that's a big plus. Even the older (mid and up 40s) models that would normally not appeal to me, do here.
- Call it a pro or con, there are some pornstars on here. Ramona Luv seems to have been on nearly all amateur sites in 2004-06 and she's here, Aaliyah Love is here as a guest model, I don't mind them, but some might. I would love to see more Ramona.
- Decent search, it works, but the whole navigation of the site could be updated, reminds me of Little Mutt in how the site works.
- Very good download speeds
Cons:
- The videos are not that clear, not even the 1280x720 ones. It could be lighting, could be the amateur "effect", but the older videos are hard to watch on a big monitor.
- Inconsistencies, one model, Isabella, has a high video download option, it's 720x480 and a bit blurry. A newer model doesn't have high video download option and the medium option is clearer than Isabella's high option.
- If I could convince them of one thing, please stop the video from streaming when I click on it to download. Firefox users should turn to No Script, trust me, some of these videos are orgasm focused so there's nothing like one starting and a loud moan roaring through your house at 4 in the morning.
- My main feeling here in the cons is that it needs updating, not the actual content updates, but the site. It took me 10 minutes to find the download link for photo sets.
Bottom Line:
We had discussed a little about this site being like I Feel Myself. It's not a lot like it, but it does have short 40-60 second videos of the woman's orgasm face that are spliced from the actual full body videos. So if you're into I Feel Myself and just seeing the face during orgasm, you will like those, I really didn't since they are so short.
Next up, interview videos. They're everywhere. Since they don't an interview tag, I scanned through the videos archives and these interview videos look to come about every 5th update. I really don't like interview videos and they take up the space of an update too. I do understand the use of them on a site like this since it's more convincing that these girls are not pros, but the pros have ruined interviews for most of us. For what it's worth, most of the girls on here seem genuinely sweet and playful.
I don't know what the deal is with the videos not looking good.
But wait a minute, the content is really good. If you're into strip, tease, which I am, you may not like these videos. There is almost no tease, it's get naked, masturbate for 7-10 minutes, orgasm. This isn't as bad as it sounds. It does add to the girls probably being filled with anxiety, nervousness. Some of the girls are much more confident and have more fun with it.
The unusual masturbation techniques used in some are interesting, erotic even, but I'm not for sure how sexually arousing they are to watch. Maybe that's me, I don't find a girl rubbing her clit against the corner of a bathroom sink to be arousing. I'm guessing what is being shown here though is that this is how the girls are comfortable masturbating. I don't believe there is a fake orgasm on the site. You get some squirters, some that make a milky mess in minutes and what I think they have going for them the most, the girls are really good-looking girls. There are few here and there that don't really appeal, but most look like regular, cute to really pretty girls.
They're all not skinny or in perfect shape. I was really surprised that I liked the 45 year old Barbie Lynn's bathtub shoot. I think they are going to sell most of these models on being real, erotic instead of drop dead gorgeous.
These are the numbers I'm coming up with based on their search engine.
Nearly 1,000 videos, and as said earlier the interview ones and short orgasm face ones are included here. Still, the site has grown since I was last on it. From the way I read it, they had several sites and decided to put all the content on them on this site. I don't remember them having over maybe 400 videos last year.
I will say they could be more clear about what you get. When I click "our sites", it shows me having access to the male masturbation site Club Stroke and having access to Whispering Lily, this is a community site that has a forum, shows the new updates at Yanks.
This is where it gets confusing. Also listed in "our sites" is Solo Touch. This shows as being a male and female masturbation site. Well, to enter it, I have to register a profile on Whispering Lily. When I go to Whispering Lily it says that all their content has been put on Yanks or Club Stroke, so I have no clue what this Solo Touch is or if its female content is already on Yanks.
A little frustrated that some of the models only have pictures. I understand that not all are willing to do videos, but I still want to mention that to potential members. Another frustrating one that I think is very important, some of the picture sets are only 15-25 pictures. Again, I understand that those are older sets.
May sound like I have mostly negative feelings here, but it's not true. The frustration comes from how good this content is and how much better it could be.
They stick with the solo theme really well. There are even dozens of videos of two girls masturbating together, but not really touching each other. This is a whole other level of erotic since you get the feeling they are drawing some inspiration from looking at the other masturbating. A few do go into girl/girl and those scenes are really good if you're into lesbian porn.
Updates don't seem to follow a set schedule. For the last month there are 25 updates, those 25 breakdown like this, 8 photo sets, 10 masturbation videos, 5 interview videos and 2 of the orgasm face only videos.
Overall, I really like the site because of the models. I will be keeping the majority of what I download, which is rare for me. And it's nice in a way that the videos are short 7-10 minutes, even at HD, are only 200 MB or so.
On recommending it, if you need tease in every video then maybe not. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn these days, this site is highly recommended. I think it's much better than I Feel Myself and would compare it more to Little Mutt or maybe even FTV in some ways without the glam. I would recommend it. I'm enjoying it and it will slip into my normal rotation of sites. More of Ginger P would be nice too!
I don't watch a lot of tv these days, but got a promo special offer in email for this site from New Sensations. Thought I would take a look and have to say, while I don't know a few of these shows in their real form, the ones I do are pretty impressive when it comes to finding porn stars that resemble the real cast of these shows. I noticed though on the TBP facts that there are no downloads for the videos. Still worth a preview visit to see the similarities.
Hey GCode, got good news, bad news and more good news. The good news is, I was a member here about a year ago and the content was better than I Feel Myself, in the sense that it was more pornographic, but kept the real, erotic feel. The bad news, I was only on it for 3-4 days before we moved and ended up not really digging into the site. Also don't think it came with the other sites it does now. Looks like they have combined them all into one now, which would be a big plus. The "more" good news, I had forgotten all about this site and am in a serious site rut right now. So, since I don't have any of the content after the move, I'll give it a shot. I'll get a fairly quick review up of it since I do have a good idea of what the content was like when I was there before. I'll try to list as many of the numbers as possible.
This network, not really for sure what the name of it is, but it has 14 sites included in it, all but one are solo models sites. I joined for Ashley Fires after seeing her content on In the Crack. There are some very good sites on this network including a medium sized solo site for Aaliyah Love. The network works well too and nice to see the sites each having zip files for the photo sets.
So the number of overall sites have changed since the TBP review, was listed as 9 included with each. The other difference between now and the TBP review, a large amount of this content is not exclusive. Nineteen of the last 22 photo sets have been from other sites that shot Ashley, mostly Kink.com sites. Still checkout the models with small to medium sized sites here. It's really not a bad deal at all when taking into consideration the TBP discount.
Thanks slutty, I didn't even know about the renew price. I have a cycle I use with types of sites and usually am joining the reality networks each year in June-August, so that may be why we're having the similar subscriptions. Which is also why I didn't know about the renew price. I rarely stay with a reality network for more than a month at a time because I know I will get bored with the same theme. On the models with the fake boobs, I'm with the anti-fake boobs beliefs as much as anyone is and while I do agree that the sites do choose which models they hire, there is still another side to that too. Not all natural models do hardcore. There are so many twists to sites hiring models that I do think they are still limited under the "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network of mostly reality themed sites.
- Very good TBP price
- Three new updates per day during the week, no updates on weekends, still balances out to a hair over 2 updates per day.
- Newer sets have 1080p option in .f4v files, recommend playing those with VLC.
- All sets as far as I can see, this site has been around for a long time, but all sets besides the "Live" sites sets include a picture set with zip feature to download.
- The "Live" sites will appear in cons too, but I do consider these a pro on one side. At one time, NA had live cam performances for their members. These live sites have all of those performances stored on them for you to download, so they are a bonus if you never saw them.
- Good download speeds
- Newer videos have 7 download options including mobile. Very crisp videos and for the most part, good camerawork.
- Lots of niches covered with costume themed sets.
Cons:
- Can understand stopping the "live" sites, but I still think it's a con even with the archives, as those really separated NA from the other networks.
- The older content which includes some of NA's best scenes, often only offer a low quality video option.
- As with most of the reality sites you will run into the occasional "why won't that guy shut the fuck up?" video
Bottom Line:
I really don't want this to come off as a review saying Naughty America isn't a good network. It's a great network, but I do think it is somewhat stuck in 2008.
This is a very professional network. To my eyes, those 1080p .f4v files are the clearest videos I've seen. There is a problem there. That is file size. Most of these range between 2 and 2.5 GB each. I actually found the 480p .f4v files to be more than acceptable, very clear also and really, the file size suggests they are still very high quality. A 480p, 30 minute video usually isn't near 900 MB, but these are.
Navigation works, I'm sure it could be better, but considering the amount of content they have, I am going to assume it's hard to squeeze all of it into an uncluttered space.
Where I think NA is running into a problem is the same place other networks have ran into a problem. They pigeonholed themselves with these niche themed sites and eventually those will become repetitive. I don't think it's a network's fault, but I would like to see them branch out a little. They have such a good collection of "older" models, why not throw in an older woman seducing her young female neighbor to having lesbian sex site? Just a thought.
The live archived content is a real goldmine for fans of solo porn. Since these were once live performances, you get the model talking to the camera, teasing, masturbating, and me being a solo fan, can really appreciate this content.
Having pictures with sets is always a plus. Much like their videos, NA's pictures are nice and clear, however, these pictures are well below average in resolution with a top out at 1000 high end, but they do look good.
The main draw of the content here, at least to me, are the themes. You've got Cougars, MILFs, Teens, they're all seducing or being seduced. Are you picking up my slacker vibe? I don't think Naughty America intends to slack, but 100-200 videos based on the exact same scenario does get boring. Hell, I don't know, let the student seduce the teacher. And again, not blaming NA for this. If they put scenes up that didn't fit exactly what the theme says there would be someone complaining that they were false-advertising.
I do think this is a very good network, especially at the $9.95 price. You just can't hardly beat that value, even stronger when you consider they are still releasing 15ish new scenes a week.
Over 1,000 "live" archived scenes. Never been to this network? These alone are worth a month's membership. Some do include more than one person, but most are solo and the Live Naughty Secretary, to me, is worth a membership just for those.
Of the regular sites, there are 26 and they are big on the "older" models, though as we have found out, older is quite subjective, in this case, most of these models are between 25-35. Over 4,000 scenes on those sites and they are all exclusive.
Model selection is pretty typical for a network, quite a few implants, quite a few tattoos, but I'm not really complaining since the site itself doesn't decide if these models get tattoos or implants.
Overall, recommended to nearly all porn fans and highly recommended if you do not have the content from the "live" sites.
Some Extra Info, # of scenes and possible DVD boredom solution
I gave this network a very high score and wanted to go back and add some things to the review. I had a lot of questions about this network because of the varying information I have read on it. Here are the numbers by site and a triple asterisk (***) will be beside the name of the sites if it is not updating any longer.
Not Exclusive bonus content:
Now this goes into something I don't know if any of us has the time to figure out.
The numbers according to the site.
12,302 DVDs, 104,910 scenes
For those that get bored with Videobox and the other common DVD sites, this section of MOFOs is filled with DVDs I've never seen. By the numbers, it is a bigger DVD section than Videobox has.
The one downfall, the quality of the videos varies, I've downloaded a few that were 480x320 and others that are 640x480.
There are lots of DVDs that I wouldn't expect to see on DVD sites like 200 or so DVDs in the "granny" category. There is bondage, gay, tranny, hairy, teens, group, it may not be the best quality, but I think this really adds to the already impressive 711 exclusive scenes. Wouldn't drop my score any based on the time that has passed for the "newness" to wear off.
I had a Chow-Chow dog growing up, had him for about 13 years before he passed away. Haven't had a pet since. I do like dogs, big dogs at that, but my wife and I live in and had lived in low-maintenance condos since we both work so much. Adding a pet now wouldn't be good for the pet or us. Maybe when we get older and can work less though. Wouldn't mind to have another Chow, loved the loyalty of the breed.
This has some interesting results for sure. I also don't really care for thongs. Went with other, but if I had to pick one of those it would probably be something lace.
I think one of the sexier ones that rarely gets mentioned or used in porn is the mesh hipsters. One model that wore these some was Susanna Spears, it may be more of an athletic thing since she was usually in a set about working out. I still like my imagination to do the work at least at first!
Looks like you're right, that's one of the more natural sets of implants I've seen. I wasn't familiar with her work on Living With Anna, but see on Google that she did get implants. I would call those similar to Sandra Shine's.
These networks are strange like that. 21Sextury used to be the worst for it a couple years ago when they first started operating as a network. If you joined through one of the standalone sites you would still get access to the other sites, but pay a higher price. Not for sure why this one changed, but if you go to the Brazzers main page here on TBP and click to join it's $19.95 and has the same sites including Pornstar Punishment. Pornstar Punishment shows as $24.95 when you click to join it. It's similar to the Tony Bucks sites that lk2fireone has commented on recently where if you join through Spunky Bee, you get the same sites as joining through Teenburg for $5 or $10 less. I don't know if it's just a marketing ploy to hope some would join through the sites not offering the discount or what.
I think what is happening with the price is that this site itself is showing up as $24.95, joining through Brazzers through TBP is still showing up as $19.95.
Check out Abella Anderson if you haven't had the chance. She has a couple of scenes on Brazzers, really sexy, natural young model.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is owned by the same company that owns Brazzers, with more amateur level models and not as many fake boobs.
- Video technical quality is top of the line. From the best I can tell, unless there are some old videos I haven't seen, every video I've downloaded has had a 1080p option.
- Every set has photo and screenshots options with zip downloads. The older pictures are only 1300 long end, but the majority are 2000 long end or higher.
- Prefer the model selection here over any of the other networks. All races of models covered nicely which is rare in networks these days.
- Not quite as much silliness or goofiness that other networks have.
- Navigation is good except for one big con listed below in cons.
- Besides the sites that come with the network, there are 32 bonus sites, these include one Brazzers site, A Day with a Pornstar, ZZ Insider, Spunk Network and the rest looks to be licensed DVDs, includes most niches, including BBW, so they're digging deep.
Cons:
- Not a lot of cons, but if one stands out the most it is the lack of a model search by name. Instead, you get the options of 18-25, Europeans, and so on, but no direct model search. What this amounts to is scanning through until you find a model you're looking for, clicking her name, then marking her as a favorite to go back to and download.
- This is more of an annoyance con, when you click on a site from the main network page, you get a full page ad that you have to close to get to the site.
- Sort of a pro/con both, quite a few ads, but some are really good deals.
Bottom Line:
After Brazzers impressed me with their improvements on their network I decided to take a shot at this smaller network they also own or manage.
I'm glad I did. The best way for me to describe this network is to say this is what Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros were before they ended up with so much content that they are overwhelming and have older lesser quality content. Everything here is high quality, 1080p option, though I honestly don't download those highest quality videos because the file sizes near 3 GB each.
The video options on the newest videos are mp4, wmv 1080p, wmv 720p and those three also have SD versions for those that don't want to download files that range from 1-3 GB each. Most of the SD ones are 500-800 MB each and look very good. The picture sets are huge. The ones I have downloaded go in excess of 200 pictures each with a 2000 long end on the resolution.
The only option I've seen missing on the older videos is the mp4 option.
Also what I think has been done on this network is someone is listening to the complaints on the other networks. The sites on here all go into niches, instead of trying to be a reality niche with the same theme from site to site. There's a solo site, an "amateur" site though these are mostly new(er) pornstars, there is a party site with group sex, an exhibitionist/voyeur type site, an interracial site, a worldwide model site, some "classic" scenes, one "reality" themed of "at work" and two other group competition sites.
This creates a very nice balance. The cons, that model search function really needs to be added. I have to think Emy Reyes is on here somewhere, but I'm still scrolling through the sites trying to find her. If there is a model search, would appreciate someone pointing me to it.
Since I've been a member, they average more than 1 update per day with some days getting two. Maybe less is better? Quality over quantity? The ads will annoy you at first especially the splash screen when you click on a site to go to, but maybe I'm just imagining this, but they seem to be less and less the further I get into the membership. Maybe it's the first time you visit a site?
It also has that toolbar/sidebar thing that a lot of sites are going to. I don't use it. It has links for the 32 bonus sites, your account, etc...
At the top you have a link for your favorites. It's a nice site design, not cluttered at all. At first, I didn't think I was going to go this high with the score, because it's not as big as most networks, but with the content they have being high quality, I think it offsets the lower number of content. On the confusion with how much content is on here, I'm guessing the higher number includes the bonus sites. There still is a lot of content here and considering the high technical quality of them, plus me preferring these models as a whole, it's better than the majority of networks to me.
Highly recommended, you'll probably be as surprised as I was.
Agree, they're a trustworthy site and I'm sure if they were going to try to pull anything bad off, they would be the first to tell it though it would probably be in a very complex, complicated way!
If you're still on 21st Sextury, they have a whole Blue Angel site, Blue Angel Live, that is really good. It took me a while to take to her. I'm usually not into blondes except Mia Stone, but after awhile, might have even been the ALS content, I really started liking her.
I don't like the music either, but as an example, as a butt man, more than a boob man, I actually prefer less reverse cowgirl, so most of these sites are stuck with making some members happy. It doesn't seem like any site has figured out some kind of a happy medium. On the Porn Pros Network, I was actually thinking there was too much reverse cowgirl and not enough regular cowgirl. Either way, we agree on the music. I don't like any music in any porn.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
