I hope I did lol! If not, 21st Sextury is going to be really pissed at me. I've always known this company to be a very stand-up company that sometimes seems to have problems explaining their new features, I'm guessing the language difference plays into that, but just couldn't see them using DRM either.
Probably shouldn't say "debating" since I'm almost certain I will join. I can remember having this on my to join list several years ago then somehow skipping it. It looks to be still updating and Chica certainly hasn't dropped off any in looks. A few questions.
The TBP facts has the photo sets listed as (40+ photos) that concerns me a little since that's not a lot of photos and makes me wonder if these photos just jump right into the nudity instead of Chica starting from clothed to nude in them.
Second, though I can't find anything on the site itself or in the TBP review, one of the expired member reviews mentions a download limit. Is there one and if so, how much is it?
I had initially credited Massage Creep to Brazzers, but caught it last week when I submitted the review. I had been on another Massage site, the one on the Teen Mega World network and thought Massage Creep was way better than it. You do get the feeling that most of their sites are genuinely trying to put a fun plot into their scenes, which is good to see. Kind of reminds me of the late 90s Vivid scenes I loved. The worst part for me on the fake cum/dick sites is the use of great models. Since I download by model, instead of by site, I ended up seeing some of my favorite models on these gallons of cum sites and thought, "what a waste".
Jurassic Cock is a fun one. I get some kind of kick out of watching Ron Jeremy work his charm and the girls seem really into him and the little skinny old guy too. I believe the network has more potential to go up as they start adding more to these better sites. What I didn't understand, on Public Violations, I downloaded a few videos from it that said 27-42 minutes on each one, then they were only 2-3 minutes. Maybe it was another of those download glitches and only downloaded a section of a full scene?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Porn Pros network, one of the more creative uses of reality porn.
- Has 42 sets overall, videos are near HD quality, but are a little grainy, I'm thinking for that "authentic amateur" feel.
- All 42 scenes are ones I will keep and really think this reality niche has been missed by most networks.
- Download speeds are very good with a DL manager, terrible without a DL manager.
- Has a good believability factor going for it. Even though you will probably know these models are porn stars, they do a good enough job of making it seem realistic to convince me with a little help from my imagination.
- Biggest pictures go up to 3000 long end, but some, keeping to that amateur theme are much smaller like a cellphone picture, 800 long end.
- Still updating, but the updates are now only once every two weeks, instead of weekly as they were in Duke's TBP review.
- All the models are cute, some stunners like Melanie Rios, quite a few Latinas on this site.
Cons:
- There are only 42 scenes. Of course, you get the network access to offset that, but really think Porn Pros has hit on a niche here that they should be really pushing.
- Some bad camera angles, could add more to the amateur feel, but bad camerawork is frustrating nonetheless.
Bottom Line:
I've seen these "hacked" sites for years, ex-girlfriend revenge, dorm room parties. While it's not really believable that someone hacked someone's social networking site and stole their near HD videos of hardcore sex, which wouldn't be allowed on those sites anyway, I think this one does a good job of making it just believable enough.
Though this site does follow a certain formula in the videos, it's one that we don't see much in porn these days. Every scene I've watched so far starts with the women clothed, trying on clothes, doing all the things us perverted men like to believe goes on, though the pillow fight goes a little far. They have been able to put models on this site that I could see doing these things. As the silliness, which is good in this case, slows, the girls start kissing and you get pretty much a lesbian scene, then a guy shows up and gets in on the fun.
The picture sets take this one further by having the girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror. Flashing each other, these create a real feeling of playfulness when looking at them. Maybe there's a deep concept going on here or maybe they just got lucky by filming it this way, but I did find these scenes to be as believable as any reality scenes in porn.
The bad camera angles are annoying, but I do think they add to the amateur feel of it.
Now, this site gave me fits without a DL manager, I actually downloaded one scene, the newest update, Veronica and Mandy, in all 3 formats, twice each and still didn't get a full download without it breaking. Nearly every scene had 404 file not found on download links through the browser. Once I used a download manager with username and password stored in it, everything downloaded fine and no 404 files.
The videos are an odd 1240x702 resolution, I don't mind that's it not exactly 720p. The selling point here are the pictures that create a realistic feel to the scenes. You're onto something here Porn Pros. The pictures probably have the first 10 minutes of the girls just coming home from a party or clubbing, changing clothes, being frisky with each other, then the video picks up with the action. I like it.
The photos in the mirrors also seem better than your standard, "pose this way" photos on porn sites, since the girls are being silly in them.
The action is generally very good. A few of the models that really shine here are Gigi Rivera, Melanie Rios and Tanner Mayes. Though my favorite scene has Lynn and Ella in it, the Latina one does some serious ride 'em cowboy on the guy. The site has a lot of personality to it.
Though small in size, I've been on sites that have 1,000 videos that I don't keep 42 scenes from, so I think this site was worthy of a review and is one of the reasons that I ended up liking the Porn Pros network.
All very good models, good, fun and original concept with younger, cute models. Can't beat that. Very nice site with a lot of network content to back it up!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Big network with some unusual niches in it and a love of fake cumshots, not as bad as it sounds.
- Any concern with billing shouldn't be, they made me a very good "stay" offer of more than half off, when declined, got the email saying canceled within seconds.
- Video tech specs are good, close to standard HD, but videos are shot in a more amateurish way, not saying the cameramen aren't good, but the videos seem to try to have a homemade look to them.
- Photo quality is very good,
- Definitely looks to be exclusive
- Major pro here, this site seems to love the use of download managers, will explain in BL. 3000 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Some of the sites, Massage Creep, Flexible Positions, are as good as most sites in those niches and would say Massage Creep is the best Massage site I've seen.
- Some interesting ideas where porn stars do things women on social sites do, like photos in mirror, to give the amateur feel to it and pull it off pretty well.
-
Cons:
- Navigation is frustrating. My first example is that some models just aren't listed, Stephani Moretti as example, clicked her name, instead of seeing her updates, I got all the new updates from all models. Can't find her in the model list either and she has multiple sets on their various sites. Works pretty good on most and maybe this is just one rare case, but seeing that she's one of the models I really like that they have it stuck out to me.
- The fake sites are just silly. I'm sure it was funny the first few times, but they really should stick with the other sites they have and let those fake dicks and gallons of fake cum sites die off.
- Not always a con for me, but there are quite a lot of implants and tattoos here, that Freak Boobs site is just bad.
- Download speeds without a manager were bad, had broken files, sets not showing up 404 errors, but the download manager seems to have cured that problem.
Bottom Line:
If I hadn't went back to using a download manager, Free Download Manager, I would have knocked at least 20 points off this network's score. I haven't been using DL manager lately on any sites. So when I started downloading from this site through my browser, the right click on the link would either give me a 404 error or start trying to stream the video, left click, save as worked better, but probably half of the files would stop downloading around 70% finished. Then there was the problem with the DL speed through the browser, I usually can get near or slightly above 2 MB/s or for better comparison 2000 KB/s instead, I was receiving 400 KB/s through the browser.
FDM saved the month though, using it, the site works really good and the download speeds are almost as high as I can receive from any site.
These fake sites on this network are a waste in my opinion. And it's not just one fake dick, fake cum sites, I'm counting five, though it looks like all have stopped updating except one and that one only updates once a month. Good move in my opinion.
The bad thing with one navigation problem, like with trying to find Stephani Moretti, is that I now don't know if the navigation for other models is showing all their content.
The good news is, they have some ideas going on in this network that I really liked. The Teen BFF site, though porn stars, brings a very amateur feel with the girls doing the mirror photos, the silly photos, that's pretty good for any of potential members that are used to seeing similar pictures on the social networking sites.
The technical quality is very good. The videos say HD, but from looking at the codec info, it's a little lower than 720p, I'm seeing 1250x702. The pictures are as good as you will see on a network, nice to see the clothed pictures in the zips too, 3000 long end on those.
Some unusual niches like Public Violations where you watch a video to see, a guy run up behind a woman and pull her shirt up or pants down or runs up and pulls his dick out. Video over. A few scenes on this site are public sex, so those are pretty good.
Massage Creep, Teen BFF, Flexible Positions, Real Ex-Girlfriends, 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18, Amateur Violations, Webcam Hackers, Jurassic Cock and Cruelty Party are all still updating, I think, one may just be a monthly update since its last update was in May, these sites are all very good. Those sites to me really boost this network with some interesting niches and plays on reality porn. Most of the models are well-known and most in these scenes are models I like, even if implanted and tattooed. Loved the Isis Taylor scenes.
Once past the download problems through browser and away from the fake cum sites, Freaks of Cock, Freaks of Boobs sites, this became a very good network. Nice quality, I don't mind that it's not 1080p as the files are big enough as it is. Overall, I would recommend it with the warning of the fake cum and Freaks sites and use of DL manager.
Going to take a stab at it based on the way I understand it.
21st Sextury has the lifetime membership feature now. This allows you to stay a member without member benefits. Meaning you can view everything the members can, like new updates, check to see if favorite models have new content, without having an active membership. You just can't download anything. I'm pretty sure on that part.
The new credits, in my thinking, are saying even if you're not an active member, but have credits left in your lifetime membership, you can download a scene. For example, if Eve Angel had a new scene and my membership expired 2 days before it came out, but I had credits, I could use them to download that scene.
I'm simply basing this one how the lifetime membership works and the mention that in the future, the credits could be used to subscribe to the network. There's a comment on ALS, believe Pink Panther made it, about the ALS On Demand sites where you don't have to be an active member of ALS to download a scene, but just pay for that one scene instead. It looks like 21st Sextury is doing something similar to that by giving the option of buying credits or earning them over time.
That "at least for a month" has become my motto with all sites anymore. I've kept quite a bit of the content I downloaded from Brazzers, over 200 GB kept, so I'm definitely satisfied with their site especially since they've stopped the shady practices.
I had joined through Spunky Bee before as well, after reading the previous comments about Teenburg being included, since I was more interested in TB than Spunky, but it was $10 cheaper. I got 9 sites with Spunky Bee, but there is definitely something different on that join page now. Seems like when I joined it, about 3 months ago, there was a box with the 9 included sites on it. Good content on this network, but I couldn't see paying that full price for any one of the sites without at least some access to the others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-06-1102:57pm (Update History) Reason: Gave credit for a site that's on another network I'm currently on too, removed that part, sorry about the confusion if anyone saw it.
Pros:
- A re-review that sees a +15 points change from previous review. A big network that focuses mainly on big boobs, many that are implants, but not all and some fun niches have been added or have grown since I was last here.
- Going to be impossible for me to figure out where the 720p and 1080p videos started, but I do know as far back as September 2009, from browsing, so about two years of those HD and true HD videos. 5 points added to score for this since it was required to stay a member 6 months when I was last on it to get HD downloads.
- Newer HQ pictures, not screenshots, go up to 2500 high end, which are real studio shot photo sets with each movie. Screenshot packs are also available and both are zipped.
- Download speeds hit right at my maximum I can receive, though at times, I do notice a slight 15% dip in speed.
- Navigation is good enough for a network.
- Network updates on average twice per day, 14 since last Monday.
- Doing better with the ethnic models too!
Cons:
- The obvious big con here is the amount of implants. I did a estimation once before of 50% of models on here having implants. I am seeing newer more natural models like Abella Anderson, also seeing more Latina, bi-racial models. So this is still a con, since if someone doesn't like implants, tattoos, it's not the best site to jump right into, but there are some really nice, natural models starting to show up.
- I won't beat this to death, but they still have my favorite hardcore exhibitionist site, Asses In Public, but it hasn't been updated in nearly 3 years. I'm sure there is good reason for it.
- I think like with the other networks, if you get bored easily, join for a month, come back for a month 6 months later and so on. The niche/story heavy sites will get boring to most of us after a month or so.
Bottom Line:
I guess you could say Brazzers took a little blue pill on their score. Though I should mention on my original review of Brazzers, I gave them a 90, first re-review dropped to 77, now up to 92.
The previous time I joined Brazzers it was to download the Asses in Public content since the external hard drive I had it on had crashed and I loved the AIP content. Once done with downloading those again, I downloaded exactly one scene from the rest of the site in a month. After that frustration I then went through the 8 page cancellation process that annoyed the hell out of me. Good news on that too.
Now when you cancel, it makes you one offer, which is the same as the price you get going through TBP, if you pass the offer up, it confirms your screenname/password, you click ok and it's canceled and received a cancellation email within seconds. Much better.
I've been able to access the HD and true HD files since the start of my membership, so they've removed the 6 month recurring member rule to receive access to these. I do think these more honest, professional changes warrant 5 points added back to the score.
On the content, I really don't remember Brazzers having the Doctor Adventures site, but they may have and my past frustration led me not to look at them. More ethnic models have helped offset the blonde implant bimbo Barbie look I had complained about previously. I also think being away for two years has helped since I've forgotten most of the niches and can see that they are as original as any of the other networks out there.
Besides the improved video quality, there are the improved HQ photo sets with each scene that have some nice 2500 long end photos of the model by herself even if it is a hardcore scene. Everything works smoothly, clear links for zip downloads, click to download a video and all the options/formats show up.
In total you get 29 sites, including what looks to be a short trip to Budapest, for a site called ZZ Series, only has 16 scenes in it, but it has some of the top tier Euro models like Cindy Hope, another favorite Aleska (Diamond) and Blue Angel. Got some rougher niche/light dom sites like Hot and Mean, Pornstar Punishment, so there is a sign of Brazzers trying to develop some new niches for their network instead of how it used to be with nearly every site having "Big Tits in/at..." or "...Like it Big".
To me, it's a marked improvement all-around. The shady business practices are gone, the focus on nothing but boobs mentality is gone, asses in public content is still there if you don't have it and the addition of more brunettes, at least some less implants, added to the improvement in the video quality without the wait and improvement in pictures, it has earned that 15 point boost from the previous review and has made its way back into my network rotation. Definite recommend for anyone, especially boob lovers.
I went on design only. The best way for me to say it is I think I made a comment once about a site having a really nice layout and design and that was Teen Models. I would assume since their site is newer it is running on a newer software so that probably explains it. I think I've commented that some sites look really plain and my only concern with those is that they may have older content, not updated, etc...
I always try to join the big networks about once or twice a year. This is one that despite seeing the mostly positive reviews, I've never joined. To be honest, I don't think I had ever even noticed this network before.
A note to webmasters about sending sample content to TGP sites. If not for a TGP site having numerous samples of content from one of this network's sites, the "ex-girlfriend" one, I probably wouldn't have ever joined it.
The problem with me missing this network is pretty simple. When Brain Pass renamed their site to Pornstar Network, I got this (Porn Pros) network confused with that one. So far, I agree with Pat's review about the fake cum sites on here being overdone, but I do like a lot of these models and a lot of the content, I do pretty good with imagining reality situations so I'll review it or some of the sites that stand out within the network, once I have some time to look at the content.
I will always say that Sandra Shine has the most natural looking implants I've ever seen. I collected Sandra for 4-5 years before I realized she had implants and wouldn't have known it then if not for an interview on her site where she talked about them. I would say in most other cases I almost always notice, but there have been a few models that I'm particular "proud" of for getting implants, but not going outrageous, not talking to you Aletta Ocean, but Cindy Hope. Even with implants she still is small-chested and ATK, ALS or one of the sites has an interview with her where she was believably, tears streaming down her face about how people had made fun of her next to nothing boobs before implants. Also thought it was kind of funny to see Zafira talk about her implants since they were for a rare genetic deformity, like Zafira ever had a deformity! She told, "I have many, many nude picture of myself. I look one day and said out loud, why is one of my boobies bigger than other?" I had never noticed it until after seeing the interview and now can notice it, so I could understand her just wanting her boobs to be the same size.
I went with a little too much. I think where it reached the point of a little too much is when I started seeing scenes that start and end with anal. If it's blended in with the various action, oral, vaginal, I'm okay with it, but when there's 1 minute of oral then straight in the butt, it's a bit too much. The only other negative with it, I think the anal gape parts aren't the least bit sexually erotic. While he is one of the more respected male porn stars, Kid Jamaica scenes, especially on the 21st Sextury network go way too much into the anal gape, he'll hold the woman there for a minute with the camera zoomed in.
I don't think anything was removed since our numbers are the same. Maybe I had one more video, my folder for the site shows 109 videos. The thing is, I had been a member of Pacino's Adventures, his flagship site several times and had never even paid any attention to Pamela's content. For one, Pacino did get a little too cutesy with her in some content with the dress-up/costume, make her look as young as possible outfits. Where I did find a good scene though was with the model Karen. She has several videos with Karen including one that is outdoors, looks like maybe at a hotel, not really for sure, but there is a bridge not too far behind them and they are using a strap-on with each other with as many as 5-6 people, mostly men, standing in one spot staring at them from the bridge.
There also could be a difference if you see the scenes without subtitles, but don't know the language. My wife is Spanish, so I've learned enough Spanish and Portuguese to at least have an idea of what is being said. Some of the scenes with exhibitionism in them may not look like it at first. I seem to discover ones I hadn't noticed each time I watch her videos. The most recent one, a public outdoor shower used to wash salt, chlorine off after swimming and she decides all of her needs the water!
It could also say something for her content since it was readily available for me, but I hadn't downloaded any of it until my 3rd membership at Pacino's Adventures. Pamela's site is a bonus site to it. A few others of note, there is one in the backseat of a car. While not directly out in the public, it is a small car, looks like maybe a Dodge Neon or Toyota Corolla and several times they pull up beside the tour buses which are very high. I think a big part of me liking her content is the playfulness she has. Her legs are mostly closed while they're sitting beside the bus and she says something about "if you see me close my legs it's because people are looking at me". You can see in the background, a very tall bus filled with people, but the playfulness there. Right as she says it, she opens her legs even more and touches herself. The taxi scene adds to the exhibitionism, not for sure how believable it is, but with a little imagination it is really good. Those are a few that wouldn't stand out as exhibitionism unless you watch through them.
I'm actually originally from the LA area and lived there for 30 years, but still hadn't joined that site just because it's LA and honestly, seeing women half naked, naked, flashing in LA isn't that out of the norm. And didn't mean for any of that previous one to be negative. I just wondered if maybe some of Pamela's content had slipped by like it had by me and still does.
I tested each of the servers with a newer scene and these are the results.
Game 57 from North American server downloaded at 2.0 MB/s consistently.
Game 57 from Europe server downloaded at 591 kb/s, dropped as low as 250 kb/s
So that's a really big difference and glad you mentioned the connectivity wizard since I hadn't ever seen that on any other site and hadn't ran it. Once I ran it, it recommended North American server, ultra-hi photos and the 6000 bitrate videos.
On the ones I had downloaded that I commented on in the original comment, those were older games, namely the first 2 with Cindy Hope in them and I ran into the 600-800 kb/s speed on those.
I will edit my original comment to add the tip of running the connectivity wizard. Knowing most porn fans are like me and anxious to download, I bet a lot of members just look over that wizard. I especially like some of the models I've seen in the newer updates. I'm the one who is a big fan of Simony Diamond, so anything with her is good and kind of surprised me since I usually like the taller, more built models like Simony, I really enjoyed game 56 with Lyla Storm and Alexa James, I wasn't familiar with either of these models before seeing this scene and for what it's worth, your site is the first one that features hardcore that my wife likes. She likes the playful nature of your site instead of the typical hardcore these days that have the rougher, more physical parts in them. Thanks again for the tip.
Thanks Rusty, For some reason I can't view their previews or download them. I had even went to one TGP site I trust, Tiava's, searched public disgrace and got around 40 results, but when I clicked them to download the samples the pages were blank. Maybe they were just having some technical issues.
That indoor, dark, repetitive part was the part I was worried about since I've been a member on 3 of their sites and all 3 sites seemed to shoot in the same general area. Feel the same about the tied part. I noticed in one of the pictures, a woman covered with clothespins clipped onto her body and that's one of those things I don't think I could get into either. Maybe I can get some of the samples to start working and start re-considering whether to join or not.
I've been back and forth to this site probably a dozen times over the last few weeks considering joining it. The public part interests me a lot, but I notice in some of the samples, there's quite a bit of bondage/pain in the scenes. I'm pretty familiar with Kink's sites and have liked the ones I have joined, but I'm curious about the disgracing part and to what extent it goes. I know Kink had one site, don't remember the exact name to make a link that had to do with water torture and thought it was too harsh for me to enjoy. I guess it's one of those things where the models obviously consent to it and I can convince my brain of that, but I can't find sexual stimulation from seeing a woman being hurt physically whether with her consent or not. Also am wondering how believable the sets are. Which is the only constant problem I've had with Kink sites and that is repetitiveness. Thanks in advance for any info.
I was surprised to see the word exhibitionism-lite. I actually looked back to see my review of a public/exhibitionist site, Public Flash, from back 4 years ago. Then noticed your much newer review of it. To me, Pamela does as much as the models I saw on Public Flash. I'm not an overly-critical person of any genre except exhibitionism. To me, this site's exhibitionism is as believable as any I've seen and includes ass, pussy, boobs. More and more sites these days are selling themselves as public/exhibitionism, but take Money Talks on Reality Kings as example, they actually show their guys paying restaurant owners to let them film in the restaurant after closing hours. Which kills any believability for me. One of the things I look for in exhibitionism videos is frustration. And you see that a lot in Pamela's scenes. Maybe I'm just reading the "lite" part wrong, but I would take that as not showing everything.
(Added tip) Continues to impress with just one problem
Edited: Webmaster Fucking Gambler recommended running the connectivity wizard, which I found in the account settings. The difference in speed on the newer scenes is around 3-4 times faster for me after running it. Went from the average of 600-800 kb/s to an even 2.0 MB/s by running the connectivity wizard and it switching me to the North American server. So if you're having problems like I listed below, especially with the newer scenes, be sure to check your server download location and run that wizard.
This is my second time being a member here in the last 6 months or so. I continue to like and enjoy the concept of sex games and appreciate the amount of work their staff must put into pulling these games off, making them believable and having a nice blend of models I'm not very familiar with mixed with some pretty big name stars. I was especially happy to see the Cindy Hope scenes.
I will admit though this isn't a problem, I just can't bring myself to download the 1080p @ 12000 bitrate videos. If you haven't been to this site and do join, you'll probably need to look into a new external drive or make some room. I download the 720p @ 3000 bitrate and a few of those random full scenes have ranged from 2.9 GB to 4.1 GB. Even the picture zips are big, with quite a few going over 500 GB. Not that I'm complaining. It is just a heads up to those thinking of joining that you're going to see some big files, some of the 1080p @ 12000 bitrate go over 10 GB for one near 3 hour video.
The one problem I've had this time as a member is the download speed. Yesterday, I had 4 scenes downloading at once at 150-200 kb/s. For a total of 600-800 kb/s. This makes those big files a bit frustrating to download. Oh and my average download speed is between 1600 kb/s and 1800 kb/s, topping out at 2200 kb/s on some sites so we're talking about a substantial difference in the speed I normally download at.
Still, the site itself overall is impressive, especially if you're bored with cookie cutter porn. And though the number of scenes isn't very high, I will say that I have every scene downloaded and plan on keeping all of them.
I think the category is too inaccurate to be considered anything except taboo. For example, white person with Hispanic person is rarely labeled interracial. White person with Asian is rarely labeled interracial. The label doesn't seem to consistently come into play unless there is a black person in the scene. Don't know if it was the first black/white scene, but do know that Hustler had a black man with a white woman in the 70s. Surely the porn producers today don't think they're still creating a taboo with something that has been around over 30 years?
Of course, we are talking about the same industry that has a model listed as barely legal one week and mature the next.
Nominated this site for a review or at least some facts info. Anybody joined it and have any info on it? It is a plus that's it through the FTV producers, but on the other hand, I've noticed their solo sites aren't always updating. I didn't even know this model's full name until a few days ago. I have a video called Geek Girl Sex that has her in it and thought she was really sex, very believable, girl next door type with a natural body. Most of the rest I've seen of her comes from Videobox, a series called My Neighbor's Sex Life or something like that. Wouldn't mind joining it if I knew a little more about it. The preview shows quite a few videos, HD quality, but the files look surprisingly small for HD and not all list the minutes. I haven't seen many HD videos that are 111 MB, so there is some concern there.
Varies, I try not to put too much weight in the scores since I think the scores go into too many factors, like how we perceive points. I had used this example before, there's a bigger difference in 80 and 91 than 50 and 61 to me.
I heard a musician talking about how fans of music were either "haters" or "biased". I thought he made a good point that "everything can't be mediocre, some have to be great and some poor or we wouldn't have anything to define mediocre by"
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of content, lots of teen models, and the network provides multiple niches for a good TBP discounted price.
- New videos are HD, even some of the older videos are HD and this is the first network I've seen with HD voyeur content.
- Some truly enchanting, pretty, seductive models like Marina F, Pussika and Maxine.
- I'm receiving good download speeds unless I only download one file at a time. With only 1 file downloading, my download speed is 700 kb/s. I, on average, can download from most sites at 1.5-2.0 mb/s. If I download multiple files from here then I can reach the speed when combined.
- A couple of sites really stand out, I especially like Beauty Angels.
- Network has steady updates, for the last week there have been 10 updates across the network, so a little more than 1 per day on average.
- Navigation is pretty good, simple, which I think works best for a site of this size.
Cons:
- Right off the bat, you can add 10 points to the review if your preferences in models are slim, small chested and amateurish. It was a major con for me. I tried to open my mind a little by joining this network. I almost always like curvy, average build, exotic women, ethnic models and there just aren't many of those on here. I don't think it's the site fault though. They advertise teens and these girls look like teens.
- Inconsistencies, though I'm not taking much off the score, I do think there are too many inconsistencies which I will go into in the BL.
- Can't understand anything the models say which is a problem on the sites that have a theme or story to their scenes, even worse, most of the subtitles are not helping, will explain in BL.
- Very formulaic scenes, this is always a problem, as I've said before with niche sites, but without any language understanding it becomes even worse here.
Bottom Line:
The biggest problem I had with this network is one that I think needs to be mentioned for potential members to know, not only from the bad side of it, but good side too. These models, taking a rough estimate, 80-90% are skinny, small boobs, more hipbones than curves, true teenage models and builds. I say that since some people may be looking for that style of model. If so, you will love this site. If not, you will still probably like it, like I did, you'll find a few models here and there that you like, but you won't love the site.
A problem I ran into that continues from the previous paragraph is that I normally do not search out skinny, small-chested, tiny butt models, so I only knew a few models on this network. I discovered Marina F, very seductive in her pictures and a hint of an exotic look. Otherwise, I was downloading and hoping for the best.
Those inconsistencies: Most sites in the network have zipped photos which is always a plus, but a few didn't have any photos. Filenames are odd, but most sites these days are. Reality Kings is one of the few networks that names their scenes and I wish more sites would consider this. The problem here on this network, some scenes don't even have model info. I usually get around the filename problem by saving to a folder named after the model. Not working on these, instead I have 43 videos named "high (1), high (2), high (3)" and so on.
The formulaic approach to scenes is made worse by the language barrier. I don't know if the model is asking the guy to fix her Volkswagen or give it to her hard. I can't blame the site for trying with subtitles, but really, those aren't helping much. An example from a Tricky Masseur scene. These may not be the exact words but are close.
Man to model laying on table with towel around bottom half: You must take towel off to reach maximum efficiency.
Model: No
Man: If you leave towel on you only get 10-100% efficiency.
Model: Okay (takes towel off)
Man: I must take my clothes off for you to reach maximum efficiency.
Funny? Sure. Erotic? No.
I really mean no offense on that part. I would even say do away with the subtitles, most porn fans understand the guy is not really tricking the model. This looks like a case of the site trying too hard.
On the score, I did go outside my comfort zone by joining this network. Most of these models to me are interchangeable.
Attention: As example, I would love to know who the model on the Tricky Masseur home page is, but I can't separate these models from each other by looking at them. That's how similar the models are to each other. Being someone who likes ethnic diversity, curvy, big butts, bouncy boobs, there just wasn't a lot here for me.
Still not going to be a negative review as I know we have a lot of fans of these slim models and if you are one then I would recommend this site highly. If not, I would still say give it a try. There are quite a few of these models that are charismatic and worth a look.
I'll throw in that I too have a membership to Teen Mega World right now and just got it a week or so ago, but cannot access this Ex GF Box site either.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Can be joined through her site and includes 8 bonus sites for $24.95, will explain the better deal, in my opinion, in bottom line.
- 68 photo sets, 1200x798 resolution, all are zipped.
- 109 videos, 720x480, 3000-4000 bitrate
- Mostly solo, plenty of exhibitionism and some girl/girl. There's a catch on the boy/girl content.
- Pamela is a highly charismatic model, she smiles a lot, she giggles, she gets visibly excited when she shows off her body in public, she's playful and as someone who is married to a Latina, Pamela still has the cutest English accent I've heard. Maybe it's the things she says, don't know, but the biggest con is going to be that she no longer is modeling.
- All of her content has stayed on my hard drive since I downloaded it, no deletes and I still go back to it often. Some of these scenes give you a feeling that you're not going to see anything like them again.
- One of the few solo models who doesn't seem to take herself too seriously.
Cons:
- No updates in 2 years
- Would have liked more picture sets and more exhibitionism in her videos.
- The general con theme here is more, more, more.
- The one real con, Pacino did record one hardcore scene of him and Pamela, but it costs $20 to download it in addition to your membership. I don't know if he will ever decide to add that one into the regular content or not.
Bottom Line:
I had said I wasn't going to review this site, but after realizing how much I go back to the content and realizing there are no reviews on it, I thought there should be one since it touches on a niche.
First, Pamela is a very young looking model, from South America. She does have braces, which could be a pro or con for you. She looks really tiny, but once out of her clothes she has a really nice, natural build. Not for sure if she would be a C cup, but pretty close and has the curvy Latina butt. It's hard to tell, but I'm thinking at first Pacino was going to use her more as a barely legal model. Quite a bit of her content plays to her "innocent" look, pigtails, knee-socks, etc...
Her masturbation sets are very believable, she does vaginal and anal masturbation in some. She has several girl/girl videos and like most of Pacino's models, she really seems to enjoy the girl/girl sets, especially the ones with the equally pretty Karen.
What sets Pamela apart though is her exhibitionist side, the innocence gone naughty, she does it as well as any model. A few examples, one set is in a busy bar, it's dim and she flashes her boobs at least 6-7 times with people walking right by. She has a couple of park scenes where she sits on a wall in a skirt and slides her panties over while people walk by, even touches herself in parts and makes comments about, "my pussy is wet". The believability of her sets is as high as any model I've seen. These exhibitionist sets contribute to the credibility of her other sets.
The bad news is that she isn't modeling anymore and hasn't been since 2008.
The good news is, you can join Pacino's Adventures, which is updating and has HD content of Latina amateur models and Pamela's site is included as a bonus site. For someone that has never joined Pacino's Adventures this is a great deal since I personally think Pamela's site alone would be worth joining for one month for the exhibitionism lover.
You can join through Pamela's site for $5 less and it does include the good site La Zona Modelos, and 5-6 other solo model sites Pacino has had that have stopped updating. It's hard to call it a network since all of these sites have been standalone sites at one point or another.
The video specs aren't great, but they are DVD quality and look good enough.
I would recommend it to exhibitionism fans just by itself. It's hard to make an estimate, but I'm saying a minimum of 1/4 of the videos have exhibitionism in them. These stand out because of the look of naughty, trying to be innocent, joy on her face. Some of it seems completely spontaneous too. Very good masturbation model too, the masturbation in the sex toy store is as hot as any solo scene I've seen.
It's probably not for everyone, some of the exhibitionism videos may take 3-4 minutes before you see any skin. Exhibitionism fans probably already expect that, but thought I would mention it. I recommend joining through Pacino's Adventures and getting it as a bonus site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
