Seems to be a growing trend with the Euro models and even worse, the videos that show the picture shoot and the photographer tells the model to give him the orgasm face! It seems to have replaced the finger touching the bottom lip, "I've been naughty" look though I don't know which is worse.
Thank you Pat, I will have some more low score reviews. I spent the last month or two taking some risks on sites that I had always been curious about and most turned out to be not near as good as I hoped. As I was saying in my other reply on this review, a lot of my lack of poor scoring sites has been me just playing it safe by joining sites I had been a member of before, but the same models are starting to bore me so I've had to expand my view of sites and take some risks.
And I agree about Regan. I don't mind tattoos, but I'm not drawn to them either. She just seems to have that little something extra that most models don't have these days. The other Regan Reese site that I left a comment on is really good for pictures as long as you have an image downloader since it doesn't have any zips. And as bad as I hate to say it, the best source for her videos is Videobox with a channel subscription to Vivid and Evil Angel, that combination has around 23 videos of her.
Thank you, there are all kinds of pitfalls to watch out for in the porn world. Besides the ones you named off, there's the "lets change this model's name and sell her as a new model" this one is so bad that one of the more respected sites, Nubiles, actually still has one model listed under two names, meaning if a member didn't know her other name, they would miss half of her content they have. In this particular case, the model, now very commonly known as Cindy Hope, was originally known as Klaudia. She had a pretty big transformation in her look, going from an average, girl next door, cute, flat-chested model to a glamorous, very pro looking model with implants. And even though Nubiles is a good site with a very good webmaster, they still haven't put her content under one name despite me posting a comment about it here. One of the other reasons I haven't had a lot of bad sites, I have learned which sites deliver what I'm looking for and join those multiple times per year. Meaning I'm kind of playing it safe, but when I saw this Regan Reese, I was drawn in by her uniqueness and willing to take a risk.
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Official solo site of Jessica Jaymes, comes with access to four bonus sites as well, but I will focus this just on her site.
- Updates weekly with a photo set and video
- Photos come zipped, newest photos are 1600 long end resolution.
- Videos are available in 3 formats, wmv, flv and avi, all three come in 1280x720 resolution, which I prefer over 1920x1080, just because of file size. Bitrates are near 3000, keeping the files from being overly large.
- Has a webcam show every two weeks from what I can see, archives are available for the past shows and if you miss any.
- Each site in this group of sites has excellent navigation for an OCD freak like me, neatly laid out, clean layout.
- Has quite a bit of interaction with Jessica, a regularly updated blog, candid "normal" pictures to go with the blog, an email to write her at and so on.
- Interesting new type of scene called "Fuck My Fan" where you can apply to have sex with Jessica.
- Very good download speeds
Cons:
- Going to have to nitpick to find many cons. Could update more often and that's only a nitpick if you've never been here before since there is a big archive to keep you busy.
- Older content is lesser quality, this is one I've never liked taking too much off for this since technology advances cause this more than the sites can help.
- Here's one you won't hear much, but I would like to see more Jessica solo, but that's more of a personal taste one.
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying this group of sites, not for sure if it is officially a network or just a group of sites, this Jessica site stands way above the others. From talking to the webmaster here and also other webmasters in the past about these solo sites, I do know these sites and some models can be very hard to work with consistently.
That's why I think this site of Jessica's is really special. Most of you know my favorite model for years was Eve Angel and I loved her old solo site. So these solo sites are right up my alley. I'm not as big into the personal interaction part as some are, but it looks like Jessica puts a lot into this site. This new style of set known as "Fuck My Fan" is something I haven't seen since the old site Be the Mask. Jessica blogs pretty consistently, 4-5 times a month and includes pictures of whatever the blog is about.
So, if you're into the interaction that many believe a solo site should have, you're going to get that here. There also are the twice a month webcam shows. How can I fault any of this? I really don't think I can.
To the site's main content. If anything works against Jessica, I joined this group of sites for Regan Reese. I like curvier models, as my name says exotic models. While I think Jessica is a very pretty woman, she's not the type of model I usually am looking for. I'm not one of those jerks that bashes a model on her looks. If I was single and she was single, I would date her in a second, but she's not the type of "porn" model I look for.
The girl/girl videos do help here. What's the newest update? With Raylene/Alexis Fontaine, one of my all-time favorite models. Tera Patrick is in one of the older ones and she's another favorite.
Where I will say I like Jessica is in her energy and performances. This should make my point above about her not being the usual type of model I go for, more clear. I do not have one scene of Jessica besides the ones I downloaded from this site, but I have seen her on sites I frequently join like Brazzers, Videobox, but still haven't tried any of her scenes. I guess that's being guilty of judging a book by its cover since she turns out to be one of the better performers I've seen in my 15-20 TB porn collection.
For some numbers, each includes photo set and video:
36 solo scenes
40 group scenes
46 girl/girl scenes
49 boy/girl scenes
5 behind the scenes, scenes
110 webcam archived videos, no photos on these
That's a total of 285 scenes involving Jessica. If you're a fan of hers, I don't think there is anyway possible to get this much content of her and as I go through the scenes, she may turn into a favorite for me since I've been really impressed by her performances.
Lets take the numbers a little deeper. The earliest video on the site is 640x480 resolution, which isn't that bad. Somewhere in there they moved up to 854x480, then the 1280x720 started around mid to late 2010. So overall, the quality is very good. Even the webcam archives show a similar progression from 320x240 to 640x480 to the last year or so being 720x480.
There really isn't very much to complain about. Well, except more scenes with Mariah Milano would be great! And maybe some more tribbing in the girl/girl scenes. See me nitpicking? One of the biggest reasons I enjoy these sites is the functionality of them. I know, go figure, but I've said it in the past, poor navigation sites cause frustration and frustration takes away from the enjoyment of the content. Not a problem here.
And by the time I finish watching more of Jessica's videos, especially the webcam ones, I have a feeling I'm going to like her much more than I did originally. Going high on the score because I do think the site edges Eve Angel Official when it comes to solo model sites. One note there, this is being written from the perspective of a new member who has none of the content so it's all new to me. I'm not for sure if it would hold up in comparison to Eve's site in the long run since Eve's site does update more, but with navigation pluses, good quality throughout, Jessica's personality, I'm going to say it's the best solo site out right now.
Also
There are four bonus sites here. I am going to work on, probably slowly, posting a review of each since the sites have changed some since the TBP listings or since a member review or comment. So those too help. Very nice package of sites overall.
At first, I wasn't too happy with the new design at Bang Bros. It worked really good, makes the site less cluttered, but the screenshot sips and part of the photo zips were not downloading. In their defense, they did have a note up that they knew everything wasn't working right and it would be fixed shortly. It was fixed within 24 hours. So now, they have really improved the functionality of their site.
The other good news, may just be for me, the model some of us know as Abella Anderson, one of the few models I have recommended to other members on here, once had a solo site called Living with Anna.
I don't know when Bang Bros added it to their network, it is just an archive site now, but this is some really great content of her with some of it coming before her implants. The amount of content of her on it isn't that great, but the totals are: 35 videos, 35 photo sets, 35 screenshot zips.
Up until now I had only been able to find 1-2 scenes of her on different sites and only had a total of 18 scenes, so this site being thrown in to the Bangbros Network, added a big boost for me since it nearly doubled my entire collection of her content.
A few other sites I hadn't seen on here before. Ava Spice. This is a tiny site with only 5 videos, 5 photo sets, 5 screencap sets, but this is yet another site where it looks like Bang Bros adds these no longer updating solo sites to their network as a nice little bonus.
Also there is a Bang Bros Remastered site that has 15-20 remastered sets from the early days of the Bang Bus.
I had first noticed Bang Bros doing this adding of sites that had gone out of business when they added the archived content from The Penny Show. Considering they are still adding new updates to their regular sites and with the much improved navigation in the new site design, it's still easily recommended and even more so if you like finding content like the Living With Anna content.
As the others have said Sandy's Fantasies dates back several years. I actually complained about them removing it from their network a few years ago since it has a lot of good, older content of some of the bigger Euro stars.
You can also see here on PU that I have a review of it on here from 3 years ago.
In my attempt to find more content of Regan Reese, I stumbled across this site, this is an update to the information.
There's not a lot of content of Regan still. There are only 7 videos, but there is a good collection of photos, over 4,000 total. My main interest in Regan's content are the photos since it's not that hard to find videos of her on the usual DVD sites like Videobox.
The problem with the photo sets, they are not very big photos. I think the biggest I've seen is 1200 long end and there are no zips. I used an image downloader, which worked well since there are 90 photos on each page. Regan gives off the artsy vibe and these picture sets are artsy, but explicit as well. That's not that common to see those two combined.
After downloading all the Regan content, I noticed a link for "bonus sites". There are 19 other sites that comes with Regan's site! These sites are all very similar to Regan's. Mostly well-known porn stars solo sites, Jenaveve Jolie, Eva Angelina, Alexis Amore, Daisy Marie, Nautica Thorn, 11 others also have these solo sites on here and there are 2-3 sites that are more into the hardcore genre, may be licensed content.
What could make these sites interesting is the collectible factor. Most of the models on here also double as exotic dancers and there are videos and photos of their exotic dancing performances. This stuff looks very rare. It looks like all of these sites were probably trying to run as standalone sites, stopped updating and someone put them all together in one package.
Since I don't mind digging around for rare content, this made this site/network pretty good for me. I don't like having to use an image downloader software, but it's better than the sites that put programming in that won't even let you do that. As a collector of Jenaveve Jolie videos, I can say that of the 30ish videos I downloaded from her site that none look familiar and it should be noted that most are trademarked, Club Jenaveve Jolie, which the Club sites were sort of a fad in porn a few years ago where a hardcore star would have a solo site showing her in more softcore videos and photo sets. The video quality from all the sites is around average. I consider DVD quality to be average, the ones I have checked are 640 high end but they are watchable. I think Jenaveve's exotic dance video at a club in Texas may be worth the price alone.
A warning, the sites are moody. I've clicked sign in with my sign in info saved only to see it reject the sign in, click it again and it opens. These sites do look old and plain in design, but overall, I thought it was a good join for $20 for all the sites. Some of the models, Jenaveve comes to mind, looks to have upwards of 10,000 photos.
If I were scoring just this site of Regan, I would go with an 80 just for the photos, she's very photogenic. Add another 5 points for the bonus sites. If someone took all this content, added zips, this would be a very good join for collectors.
The two I don't like are the, "I've been a naughty girl and you just caught me with my finger in my mouth" expression.
And the, mouth open, "Can you tell I'm faking an orgasm" expression.
I prefer to pick my own, but I'm noticing more and more sites are going to assigning you a username and password. The last four sites I joined all assigned me a username and password. Hey, at least it's giving us reason to use our computer for something besides porn, who knew I had a software on my PC that lets me save usernames and passwords in doc files? Now if I could find a software to find the damn things!
No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!
Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!
But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that is only about nude photos, no videos here and most of the photos are non-sexual poses. The selling point for me to join was that I liked several of the models and the price is right at $9.95 per month.
- Really nice pictures, I like the lighting, they also come zipped.
- I personally didn't have any problems with navigation and thought it was very easy to use. It's one of those sites where you start at A on the model index, click A, scan through those models, go to B, and so on.
- If you are interested in photography, I would say this site would be a nice place to start. It's very artsy.
Cons:
- Well, if you're coming here to find anything that doesn't require some imagination to enjoy from a sexual standpoint, you're out of luck.
- This is actually a con based on the sister site Goddess Nudes, the photos could be bigger, most of what I have downloaded top out at 1999 long end. I've not scanned through all of them, but the majority have been around the 2000 long end range.
- There's not much tease or strip here. The model I was most interested in, Zulfija, doesn't have a clothed picture on the site!
- I personally think Goddess Nudes, ran by the same company, is a better site if you at least want some sexuality in the photos and the photos are bigger, plus it's only $4.95 a month.
Bottom Line:
I don't think I can write much more about this site than the pros/cons cover.
This site has been around a long time. The content to me is softer than what I consider softcore. This can be a problem since most of the models start out a set already nude, but never really show anything more than they do in the 1st picture of the set. I do respect that this is the style of site Domai is, but I just can't get that excited over looking at sexy, naked women staring off into space.
There are bright spots here though. The quality of the photos are very good, lots of natural lighting in the outdoor shots, good price, daily updates and if you like using your imagination, this site will really let you do that.
It has been said before so I won't go into it too deeply. There are no videos.
One other thing that is probably just me being used to larger photo sets, the photo sets I have downloaded seem to average between 40-60 photos.
On the positive side because I am going to recommend this site to those looking for softer content, artistic content. The choice of models is very good. I will add that there are some sets that have photos topping out at 3000 long end. If there are others that are bigger, I haven't found them.
There is a package deal to join both Domai and the sister site Goddess Nudes, but the offer I received was for $44.95 for both for 3 months. I just joined Domai for $9.95/mo. then joined Goddess Nudes for $4.95/mo. which equals out to the same price as the multi-month option.
I really can't suggest anything to change except the size of the photos. I'm sure they have established a fanbase that loves this style of nude photos and respect that. As I said in the cons, I would recommend Goddess Nudes over it in a head to head comparison just because the photos are a little more sexual and have higher resolutions. Makes a nice pairing of sites for $15 too.
So, if you're not wanting videos, not wanting anything real sexual and are just looking for some nice quality nude photography, I would recommend it based on the low price. If you're looking for anything more than very soft softcore, I wouldn't recommend it.
Thanks for this info. This model must have had a very short career and everything she does seems to start out nude. I had wondered about Teen Dreams, noticed that they were updating a lot or what appeared to be more than they used to, but didn't see many models that caught my eye. It does look an error on the Zulfija content since the front feature model says 5 sets, the other I linked says 4, but there's only 1. Another thought, all of Zulfija's sets I have are very short on the picture count. The ones from Domai and Goddess Nude have around 20 photos in each only, so maybe Teen Dreams once had 4-5 small sets and just combined them into one regular sized one. Again, thanks, I will keep looking elsewhere.
I do think part of the problem is our language difference, but I do understand the points you are making and appreciate you doing your best to explain them in a language that isn't your native language.
What I'm going to do, to be fair to you and to the members here, potential members of your sites is review each of your sites with updated information. I'm afraid if the information doesn't get updated you're going to have more upset customers and hopefully, I've at least been friendly about it. I know others won't be if they are expecting more.
I also understand about the price. My comment about worth $5 was based solely on the amount of Regan content, not the whole network. I'm going to leave the recycle comment because some of it is recycled, not exclusive, but I am going to remove the part about you running a dishonest company. Maybe that was unfair of me to say without an explanation. I will review your other sites over the next week, some of the scores may not be that high, but I will also be fair in those.
That is a shame about Tonya. I found her and Regan both to be excellent performers. Thanks for working around the language barrier and just to add, I think the Capri site is one of the best looking sites I've seen. I did think it looked like a new site with the clean design menus in the sidebar.
I used to, grew up about 10 minutes from Dodger Stadium, loved pro baseball as a kid. Never really liked pro football, but loved college football. I guess growing up I liked almost all sports, but I don't follow any now.
I'm going to take into consideration that English is not your native language.
You say that "with your membership get access to lots of fresh content weekly". In all fairness, I am just reviewing Regan's site. The score would be higher if I reviewed the whole network as one site, however, all of your sites are not updating weekly either. Tanya's site last update was 4/25/11, that was 4 months ago. Then Regan's isn't updating, so 2 of 5 are not updating. I'm not trying to be too rough there, but I do want you to understand that as a whole network, I would be nicer with my score.
On Regan, I'm not for sure why her leaving the business two years is relevant. I'm not complaining about the lack of updates. I had already read from The Best Porn that the site had not updated since 2009. So that's a non-issue.
Where I do take an issue is with you saying I should appreciate the content that is still there on Regan's website. I complimented the content, I complimented the site's navigation and setup, ease of use. So I did appreciate the content, but your wording of it says, "we had to delete some of the content" you all went from having 83 photo sets to 22. That means you all deleted 73% of the photo sets. That's not some, that's most. The only way I know to show you this is to say would you be happy if your subscribers only paid 27% of the price of your site? You wouldn't appreciate that or else you would lower your price 73%.
I'm not fully believing the non-recycling comment and I will explain why. On Freeones, I can pull up the old version of "Cake Friends". The only difference in the watermark is it moved from the left top corner to the bottom right corner and is a different logo, removing Capalli from Capri's name and adding XXX. Where you hurt yourself here is that you're telling me that Capri also has sets being re-released with a different watermark.
If I go look into Capri's updates I see that all of her updates that had the old watermark on them were re-released on 8/7/11. In photos, Capri has a total of 17 photosets and 11 of those 17 were re-released on 8/7/11. In videos, the newest released video is 8/7/11. You just told me that these 8/7/11 releases were due to a change in the watermark. If I look back before these re-releases, the newest video on Capri's site was 7/15/10. The newest picture set before the re-releases was 7/14/10 and her newest webcam archive video was 11/29/09. So, by this theory, Capri's site is not updating either unless it's recycled content.
That one new Capri photoset has 33 photos in it, all the previous ones had well over 100, some over 200. So that update looks questionable too. If I had the time, I could go through all of the sites and check this, but I now believe 3 of 5 sites are not updating with new content.
Edit: In all fairness, this webmaster seems genuinely honest. Some of the content is recycled, I'm sure there is a fine line between what is dishonest and what is just a difference in subjective definitions. I'm removing the dishonest part with the thought that maybe future members will read the review and see that it doesn't have as much content as expected.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Regan Reese, one of the very few heavily tattooed models I really like. She's the big pro with this site for me.
- Comes with access to four other sites, Jessica Jaymes, XXX Capri, First Class POV and Tanya James.
- There are some nice quality photo sets of Regan, one goes up to 4000 long end on the pictures and all photo sets have zips.
- Video quality is okay at best, but I haven't seen much solo Regan so that's a pro since they have some solo videos.
- The other four bonus sites are pretty good sites. Especially if you like Jessica Jaymes as her site is still updating and has quite a bit of content.
- Webcam archive of Regan's webcam shows
- Surprised me, but there's been a new update listed as 8/7/11, maybe the cons will explain this since in the TBP stats, it hadn't been updating since 2009.
Cons:
- Going to need a lot of these, will fill the details in in the bottom line.
- Price, $29.95, bonus sites are good, but I joined for Regan's site and have to say $29.95 is about $24.95 too much.
- Photo content numbers have dropped drastically from the TBP stats update and even from Monty222's review in 2009.
- Video quality is not that bad if you don't mind downloading the flash video versions. The resolution is plenty good enough, it's an odd one on most 842 long end. Some are not that good and some drop down in the 468 long end area.
- Possibly removed and recycling content, TBP facts noted that no updates had came since 2009, with decreasing content count and new updates showing up in 2011, it's at least a reason to question if it's being recycled.
- No consistency at all, photo resolutions vary nearly from set to set, same with videos.
- Audio in webcam archive sets comes and goes, which is a big part of webcam sets, especially with a dirty talker like Regan.
Bottom Line:
(See my comment for updated information)
Regan Reese is the type of model I normally wouldn't be that interested in. While I've said many times that I don't mind tattoos or implants, she has a ton of tattoos and implants. Something about her though that I really liked on a few sets I got of her from Naughty America, maybe it's her curves, her lips. I just found her very attractive.
So I find this site of her. Read Monty222's expired review and combined it with the later updated TBP stats and was more than happy to pay the $30 to get, listed by TBP on 1-5-11 as 75 videos, 83 photo galleries. That's a good amount of content for one model plus the site comes with 4 bonus sites including at least one, Jessica Jaymes that is still updating and has nearly double the content Regan's was listed as having.
In Monty222's review he listed 29 videos and 51 photo sets, and the site was still updating at that time. I trust Monty222 and the TBP stats. The reason I am so trusting there is because this is what the site now has.
41 videos, 22 photo sets. Ahem. How does a site go from 51 photo sets in Monty222's review in 2009 to 83 photo sets in the January 2011 stats update from TBP to 22 in August 2011? I'm not going to accuse them of recycling content, but I think they're recycling.
The reason I think this is the TBP stats update in January 2011 says the site hadn't been updated since 12-2009. Lo and behold, there's a new picture set in August 2011. I'm sorry, but content amount dropping that much, no updates in a year, then new updates start showing up is usually a sign of a site that's removing old content then recycling it as new content. I've been here before with a few other sites.
How is the content that's there? It's good. I would have been very pleased with the content if the number hadn't dropped so much. I'm not real picky about video quality unless it's just impossible to watch. My focus has always been the quality of the model(s). You can give me 10 1920x1080 videos of models I'm not interested in and I'll trade them for 10 640x480 videos of models I am interested in.
The case here though is the content is just not there. Just put the content you removed back up and call it an archive bonus site instead of trying to fool new members into thinking they are getting new updates. I would imagine most people that join this network of solo models join for Jessica Jaymes since it's still updating and even has new webcam episodes. So this site of Regan's is probably just a nice bonus to it.
Where this gets worse. This site is really nice. The filenames are named by the title of the set on the site, how many times have I asked for that? It has probably the best navigation I've seen on a solo model site. It allows one click, by situation, finding of content. Makes it very easy for me to post exactly what is up.
Boy/Girl photosets: 1
Girl/Girl photosets: 6
Group photosets: 4
Solo photosets: 11
Total photosets: 22
Boy/Girl videos: 3
Girl/Girl videos: 4
Group videos: 8
Solo videos: 9
Webcam archive videos: 16
Total videos: 41
To put this in perspective, the total combined content of videos and pictures is 63. In January 2011, it was 158. Maybe someone is confused at the site and thought update meant taking sets down?
I normally will not post a review of a site that I would score below 70 since if it's below 70, it's not likely I'm going to be on it long enough to have a fair view of it. I don't need the time here. Took me 2 hours to download the whole site. The site folder is 7.6 GB. Content itself is very good to great even. If there was 158 total sets, I probably would have went into the mid-80s with my score. I don't care about if a site like this is updating or not. Give me the 158 sets without updates over 63 sets with recycled updates any day of the week.
On a positive note, they do offer three different video formats, wmv, mp4 and flv. In most cases, the FLV files are the highest quality, but I have noticed on the webcam videos the sound will suddenly just stop. I can see her lips moving, but hear nothing. These webcam videos, poor quality and all, are still very good.
Still, take this as a warning to others considering this site. In my 200+ reviews I've only scored one site lower than this one. The webmaster needs to put those other sets back up. If there's a legal reason then I could understand it, but we know it's not an age issue. Seeing that the content on all these sites is "exclusive" I can't see how it could be a copyright issue with possibly another site. It instead looks like the typical remove old, put it back as new, recycle move. If I'm wrong and those sets suddenly re-appear, I'll reconsider my score. Unless you're a huge Regan fan or fan of great navigation, I wouldn't recommend this site.
I think I've caught the messmer-bug! I've always collected by favorite models, but my favorite models are either disappearing or they are calling in their performances based on their names selling a set, Eve Angel and Sophie Moone, on that one. There's something about this Zulfija though. The sets I have found of her so far wouldn't really be to my usual liking except for the one on Met-Art, which is now one of my favorite photo sets I've ever seen, but only one set on Met. It's like she's teasing me! The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes would not be to my normal liking. The one on Met-Art she starts dressed in a dress and at least poses several times with her clothes still on. The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes start nude. So my thinking when I saw Teen Dreams had her content was based on the knowledge I have of Teen Dreams sets in the past, they rarely start the model out nude in a photo set.
Oh, here's the link to the other preview page they have of her.
http://tour.teendreams.com/featured/zulfija.php
The TBP/PU screencap of Teen Dreams actually shows the top of her head as the front page featured model. When she pops up there that one says the five sets, 500 photos, 2250px. It just seems like as good of a site as Teen Dreams has been that making fairly big errors on two different pages isn't that likely.
What has happened, I've become once-bitten recently with another site removing content. I normally wouldn't post a review of a site I would score as low as I'm going to score this one, but I think the amount of content removed needs to be reviewed for future warnings to others. As you will see in that review, Club Regan Reese, I seem to be running into more and more problems with sites these days, two billing issues, one site removing content, in just the last few weeks and then not knowing if Teen Dreams has made two big errors or has maybe removed content too. I seem to be more on a photo kick lately, but I'm not finding much to try since, as mentioned at the first, I can be picky about photos because I like the model dressed to begin the set. It's kind of funny as I have laughed through most of this post because I always aggravate messmer about being picky, now I've seemed to become the same way. Oh and yes, I've been a member of TD more than 10 times over the years, but not since 2009 or so. Now to go write my first negative review in years.
Somehow I have completely missed the model, Zulfija. Happened to see her on Met-Art and decided to see if I could find any other content of her. I found some on Domai and Domai's sister site Goddess Nudes, then found a thread on a forum that said she was on Teen Dreams. I go to Teen Dreams and see her in the featured models section, click it and it says, "We have 4 exclusive series of Zulfija inside our members area!"
Since I knew they had a preview members area I clicked it just to make sure it's not sets I already have. When I go to her model page, she has ONE set. This becomes further confusing when she happens to be the feature model on the main page. It says they have five sets, 500 photos, 2250px of her. Right now, in my porn rut, she's a deal breaker. What I'm wondering, since Teen Dreams is known for the use of quite a few aliases for models, is she maybe listed under a different name? I've never known Teen Dreams to be a dishonest site, so I want to believe it's explainable, but as said above, it's a deal breaker. Does anyone know how much content there is of Zulfija on Teen Dreams?
Well, considering how many times I've seen Eve Angel and Sophie Moone naked, I kind of feel like I know them personally!
Similar to the above Californians, I know of at least 3 pornstars that went to the middle, high schools I did, but didn't really know them. It usually works the other way for me. I've met them after they become porn stars since they blend in with everyone else in California.
I do believe I made an error on my first ticket. I submitted a second one and you replied to it in less than a day, so the cancel went through. I will edit the original comment here to say that the problem was resolved. As I was saying above, the last thing I wanted to do was give you all negative, undeserved feedback based on something that wasn't your site's fault, but on the other hand, I try to give our members here a heads up of any potential problems in case they then run into them too. It's always appreciated by most of our members here to see a webmaster doing their best, like you have here, to be active with your members and helpful. Thanks again.
I do understand that problems like this will happen and I'm fairly well-known around this site for being really laid-back and easygoing. I'm not going to be one of those customers that panics and goes into a cussing frenzy, though it probably would humor the members here!
As I told the others above, I believe you all are a honest company and honest mistakes happen. I do see where the cancel page for netbilling customers has been changed to send potential canceling customers to a support ticket system, but I opened a ticket, estimating around 32 hours ago, still haven't received a ticket number so I can't check the status of the ticket and don't have any type of cancel confirmation. At this point, I feel like I'm being the annoying one since I'm accepting that maybe I did something wrong in the opening a support ticket part. It's entirely possible that I used my work email instead of my personal email address in opening the support ticket. Though the account is registered to my personal email address.
I'll blame those damn auto-fill in the blanks settings on that since my wife and I both use the computer and four possible emails pop up when I come upon an area to fill in email.
So my question now is, should I open another ticket just in case I did use the wrong email? That's me trying to be respectful of your staff by not opening more than one support ticket. It did hit me though that it's possible I could have clicked on the wrong email address. And thanks for the fast reply and working on this issue. It says more for your site's support than the majority of sites these days.
The worst part, I've sent the email/support ticket, but still haven't gotten it canceled or any confirmation of it. I don't understand these sites either. I know that it costs them more to have the top billers, but like with this site, they have ccbill and epoch listed, why not just let everyone join through those? Would make it much easier for us customers. I'm still holding onto the fact that I believe this site is a reputable one and we're just having crossed-up communication, tech problems maybe with their site, etc...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
