| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Bopping Babes
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that was recommended to me by PU member mbaya and it's exactly what I was looking for. More softcore, dancing, stripping and teasing.
New videos are added every two days.
The number of videos is more than 1300. Each one is around 10 minutes.
The models have sexy English accents
Pictures for nearly every scene.
There are no download limits. |
| Cons: |
For the most part, the stripping only goes to nude. I would like to see a little more down there.
Doesn’t come with any other sites. I have been a member for two months now and am starting to feel like there needs to be more or slightly different content. Like it could evolve into more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I sometimes feel frustrated as a porn fan. I haven't gone outside my comfortable box much. Some of the most hardcore sites are still turn-offs for me. I tried some sites more focused on photos and those left me feeling like I needed more. It's like I'm going through porn puberty! This site was recommended to me and I really like the site.
What I got from this site was a lot of teasing, softcore stripping videos. There were a few things that attracted me to them and to the site. I like the idea of getting my man all hot and bothered by how sexy I can be when I show him just enough to get his FULL attention.
The women are about my age or a little younger as they were nearly all between 25 and 35. They seemed very comfortable with their bodies, although many were not so perfect. This was just like me too. I liked that they talked in very sexy ways while they slowly stripped, mostly while dancing. Some were not very good dancers, just like me. There was something else here that I have never seen before. When they talked to the viewer, they were asking him to show their cock and stroke it. I found it worked for me too. I would love to try this kind of dirty talk on my man to see his reaction.
Mostly I understood the women who spoke in English accents that I found very sexy. It seemed to add a nice touch of class. I kept waiting on one to ask if I wanted a spot of tea. The outfits such as nurse, stewardess, tennis player etc. made the scenes better as they seemed like there was some roleplay. Being a former Catholic schoolgirl, I still have the odd fetish of seeing women in schoolgirl outfits and they have those here.
I also found it enjoyable in a personal way as five models were named Katy, Kate, Katie or some variation. They could be me!
The site has more than 1300 updates and adds new ones about every two days.
I found the site easy to use and a lot of fun. It at least made me feel like it did more than the photo softcore sites and didn't make me cringe like some of the hardcore sites did. I really like it and would like it even more if they worked in a handjob, tease, CFNM twist. |
|
01-06-20 06:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
Milking Table
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Fantasy Massage network of six massage themed sites.
Comes with access to Adult Time, which has over 56,000 videos
There are no download limits
The women range from innocent barely legal to MILFs who know what they like.
The site was easy to use and the streaming player works without needing to buffer. I like to stream scenes before downloading them. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating as of February of 2016.
One thing I noticed was there are a lot of tattooed models on here if that's a problem for you. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milking Table is no longer updating and that is a shame as I found it deserving of my time and attention. I found 112 videos of men getting massaged and women helping them with hand and blowjobs.
What I liked best is the way the cum shots were shown as a reward for the women, who were visibly excited by what they were doing and what they were about to get. The pretty models seemed to enjoy the scenes even more than the lucky guys. The scenes generally start with the couple talking, but not a real story. She next helps herself and her guy with a good slow stroking hand job, then some oral loving. What happens next is something I have not seen on another site. He lays down on a massage table with his nice very hard cock sticking down through a hole in it. She is stroking and sucking his cock, but you don’t see his face. Instead the focus is on her look of pleasure as she is enjoying him as an object of her desire. As a reward she gets a nice cum shot in her mouth or on her face. I love to watch men cumming, especially big amounts. For me seeing that creamy filling shooting out is always the best part in a porn scene.
The models varied as you see some that are innocent and barely legal and some that are into their thirties and even forties. The younger models were fun to watch. What I liked even more was that I could easily see myself as one of these older women, doing what they were doing.
My biggest complaint is that there were so few videos. However, you also get Adult Time with over 56,000 videos of many different kinds of sex action. For massage content, you get this site as well as the six sites of the Fantasy Massage network. It's a site worth looking into if you find yourself bored with Adult Time's regular content. This is close to being CFNM porn with the models keeping at least some of their clothes on throughout most of the scenes. |
|
01-06-20 06:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
153
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?
You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.
|
12-09-19 06:39am
|
Reply
154
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
|
12-09-19 05:27am
|
Review
155
|
Love Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. |
| Cons: |
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. |
|
12-08-19 08:47pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
156
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
For my money, the best of the Met-Art sites.
1,183 models, 1,143 videos and 2,691 photo sets.
Videos and photos are downloadable. No restrictions.
8 video updates and 8 photo set updates per month.
Themes with many of the scenes, whether they're believable is a different question.
Includes girl/girl scenes too. |
| Cons: |
I have seen a few of the scenes on other sites in the Met Art network.
The naming of the scenes can be confusing. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Life Erotic is like what most softer sites seem to be going for when they step outside the softcore realm. There's light BDSM, masturbation with objects (heels, corn on the cob, various insertions), there's wax play, a few scenes in October even used fake blood for Halloween themed scenes. There's more creativity here and I like it. One thing you might be surprised by is the amount of close-ups in masturbation. Some are close enough to see the clits getting harder/swollen. The models are almost all very attractive and there's over 1,000 of them. They seem to be trying to break away from being a photo focused site even though their total numbers show more than double the photo sets as videos, the updates are including an equal amount of videos as photo sets.
The video quality on the newer videos go up to 4K and go down to 260p with 5 options between those including 720p and 1080p. Adding themes, not really stories, to the scenes adds a more interesting twist to these scenes. Some of it seems forced like a woman masturbating with a heel. The blood scenes, even the hot wax scenes seem to be something they're not completely comfortable filming, but they are a welcome change to the formulaic world of harder softcore porn.
This site would be a great choice for those that like harder masturbation. There's a lot of dripping, creamy, orgasms, very fast fingering, use of extreme objects and even suction pumps. It does a really good job of separating itself from other softcore masturbation sites by -- in my opinion -- showing how women really masturbate. There's not a lot of artsy points in it, but speaking for myself, there's not a lot artistic about my masturbating so I can relate more to this content.
My biggest complaint is the naming of the scenes. They will have one with the model's name or action and a number like Pumping Hard 2, you find other scenes by the model and there's Afternoon Fantasy 2. I'm going to try and put that together that they have a series called Pumping Hard and there are other parts featuring other models doing a similar action (suction) and it's not scenes being split into parts.
With that being my only real complaint, it shows why I really like this site and nearly all of its content. |
|
12-08-19 08:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Artistic, solo porn of natural looking models.
Photo update every 3 days, video update every 6 days.
It's believable masturbation porn. I think that's the big selling point.
Videos are explicit in showing the masturbation and the photo sets are also full show of spreads. Both are downloadable.
227 videos, 1,047 photo sets and 212 models.
Easy cancellation, bills through echst.net, but the cancellation process is right in your account. |
| Cons: |
The scenes most likely have an audience for this type of porn, but it's not really that interesting to me.
The scenes are very repetitive.
No purpose, story or reason for these women to be masturbating, it just feels contrived. |
| Bottom Line: |
Give credit to the marketing department. With a name like Eternal Desire it sounds like there might be something really exciting going on. Instead, it's a group of almost all white, young, models masturbating on a bed. It reminds me a little of I Feel Myself without the hotness factor.
The scenes have almost nothing varying between scenes. There is explicit masturbation, but there's a feeling of this is exactly how I used to masturbate when I lived with my parents and didn't want to risk getting caught. I'm not for sure that translates well into porn.
The amount of content is okay with 227 videos and 1,047 photo sets, but those are even on what I'm going to call "the quiet side". If you look at picture 1 then look at the last picture in the set there's very little difference. I need progression in my porn!
The models are pretty enough. Most could easily pass as girl next door types. Which is where I think the videos fail. They could have at least had the girls be more playful, teasing, it's instead like watching a selfish porn scene where the model is just into touching herself and not playing to the camera.
The quality of the videos is good, they have 4K on all videos over the last year or so, before that 1080p was standard and those resolutions go down to small mobile sizes.
I think this sums up my feelings about it. I got most excited for the scenes that had clothed women in the preview. Even if it's just a pair of tights. I keep feeling the word "selfish" when looking at the scenes. I had the same feeling about I Feel Myself. So, that could just me and something I don't like.
The lack of variation in what happens in the scene (masturbation and that's all), no girl/girl scenes, I just can't get into this porn. Most of the models settle into one masturbation position (on knees, on back) and stay there for the whole scene.
The girl next door type models is a plus, but that asks why have them nude to start the scene? The girl next door isn't likely walking around outside in full nudity. At least the quality is high and I think for the right person this site could be a lot better for them than it was me. |
|
12-06-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
158
|
Teenrs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Teen network that includes 5 (small) sites featuring a specific niche on each site.
It's different, I really thought I was going to have buyer's remorse, but the scenes are quite good and I ended up liking it.
Unless I am counting wrong, I'm counting 145 scenes on the entire network of 5 sites, but want to add, I downloaded 50 of the scenes.
Videos have 540p, 720p and 1080p options, there are screencaps, but I haven't found a way to download them.
Most of the videos are long, averaging 45 minutes each and most involve more than two people. |
| Cons: |
Four of the five sites haven't updated since 2016 and the one that is updating, hasn't updated since November 20th, 2019 (more than two weeks ago).
There are good ideas here, there's creativity, why stop producing this content?
It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to pick a favorite niche in porn it would be CFNM. They have a site here called CFNM 18. I knew it was going to be a small site, but didn't know how small. It has 14 scenes on it. They are all very good scenes and will be saved with my other CFNM videos from other sites, they are creative, they scenes are long with a couple lasting over an hour and they're exactly what I like in CFNM. The last update was in 2016.
I also like the sites where games are played, strip poker type games, the various naked twister type games and they have a site called Spicy Roulette. I was looking forward to see what they could do to make a roulette wheel sexy and there's 12 scenes on it. These scenes are good, they are fun, and these are major group sex scenes which I really don't see a lot of anymore. The scenes on Spicy Roulette feature as many as 3 males and 5 females, you'll have two or three women riding the men and two of the women tribbing in the distance. Very sexy scenes.
They have a site called My Dr. Feelgood, which is the medical niche and it's one I like. It has 10 scenes on it. These are good and again, very long scenes in the 45 minutes range. It just feels like someone had a busy year in 2016 and decided to stop filming porn.
Next is 18Dom, which is a pretty sad attempt at domination porn as 18 year old female models are "dominating" men. The scenes are not bad or believable. The models in all of the scenes on this network are very pretty and like the other sites I've listed so far, this one has long videos in the 30 minute range. The domination is about as believable as the number of scenes I'm going to say, it has 13 scenes on it. These kind of remind me of CFNM scenes except the models end up nude. It's mostly soft "physical violence" like a 90 pound woman forcing the man down.
The last site in the network is Club Exclusive and it is the one that updated on November 20, 2019, it has nearly 100 scenes on it, but there's something to note here. These scenes have the Club Sweetheart watermark on them so they are from Club Sweethearts, they're pretty good scenes overall, there's creativity, some even have a CFNM type feel to them, there are handjobs, even a couple go into the strip games, so I guess it works as a good way to preview Club Sweethearts.
The other four sites are generally better than it as you can tell those sites had a lot of thought put into their scenes. If those first four sites had around 50 scenes on each, I would score this network very high, but instead, I got around 50 scenes total and nearly all came from those first 4 sites. All wasn't lost as I've joined a few sites where I don't download anything.
If those 4 niche sites interest you and you find a good deal like I did, it might be worth it to join and grab the scenes from those sites. If those niches don't interest you, I don't think you're going to be too happy or impressed with this tiny network. I felt like an 80 is a fair score just based on the content on those first 4 sites being very good. |
|
12-02-19 11:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
159
|
Wow Girls
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The flagship site of the Wow sites, includes Wow Porn (not updating, see review), Wow Girls and All Fine Girls.
I think as a collective these might be the prettiest models I've seen on a site or network.
Almost 5,600 films and they update on average 1 photo set or video per day across the 3 sites.
Around 5,500 photo sets and they downloadable in zips.
I mentioned it on the Wow Porn review, this content is harder than most of these soft-hardcore sites, there's quite a bit of anal content for example. According to the tags there are nearly 600 anal films, that just sounds like a lot for a network like this. |
| Cons: |
Two pre-checked cross-sales blend right in with the background when signing up.
Here's a funny one, couldn't they are least throw an average looking woman in? These models are so pretty.
The one navigation issue I have noticed is when you hit the back button, you have to click on "latest" to get back where you were at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had this site recommended to me as someone that is a big fan of Nubiles. The content here is a little more hardcore than Nubiles, but it's not going to find its way to Evil Angel anytime soon. You get a good blend of pretty, very pretty and too pretty models here. Even the guys are nice-looking, few if any are much bigger than average size in dick size and they make believable couples with the young female models.
The amount of content is very impressive for a site I had never heard of. When you add the photos and films together there's over 11,000. I would have a model count, but there's no efficient or realistic way to count them as they're listed alphabetical and the letter A has 27 pages.
That one navigational glitch needs to be fixed. If you're looking at a photo set and click back instead of taking you back to where you were at in the photo galleries it takes you back to top of the page and for some reason it will change what site you were looking at. They have boxes for All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn. It won't even be close to what I was looking at before I hit the back button.
The rest of the navigation is simple to use. There's probably something I'm looking over like a "back to your content" link. My favorite scenes are the all-girl scenes with more than 2. It will probably always be a believable fantasy for me, a former college sorority girl at a religious school, to believe there are sororities having 3+ girl orgies instead of scripture studies. If it's not true, please, don't tell me.
The videos are very good quality. I just am not technical enough to break down these options like 60 frames per second, 30 frames per second, they have some scenes with 4K, I download 720 or 1080, mostly depending on file size since I just have a laptop and one external hard drive. I have to be selective on what I download.
The three sites seem to differ only a little. All Fine Girls seems to be about 80% hardcore, including some threesomes. Wow Girls is similar with a high percentage of boy/girl scenes with solo scenes blended in. Then, Wow Porn, the one that is no longer updating has more lesbian scenes.
It's a very nice package of sites, excellent quality and I'm going to say top 3 prettiest model group on any site.
I like it so much I might choose to join it for a year instead of Nubiles. |
|
12-02-19 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
160
|
Wow Porn
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly pretty models, some soft content, some harder.
Very high quality video specs including some videos with 4K and 60 frames per second.
Over 1,100 films, all are downloadable with no restrictions.
Over 700 photo sets, downloadable in zip files.
The boy/girl hardcore scenes are quite explicit compared to other softer hardcore scenes.
Production quality gives this site and its content a major boost. The hardcore scenes show this most with excellent close-up camerawork and focused cumshots.
Very easy to use site with tags along the margin and tabs for films, galleries and the girls. |
| Cons: |
It had two pre-checked cross-sales on sign-up and I nearly missed both of them.
I think it's a common con in this genre/niche combination, some scenes have the it factor, others just are kind of boring.
It looks like it stopped updating in early October 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't think I would ever write a review that started out talking about how well the site works. But I am going to. Down the left side margin are the tags, across the top are "films", "galleries (photos)" and "The Girls". It's very simple to use. If this was a small site I wouldn't be as impressed, but this site has over 1,000 scenes and it's this well organized.
That offsets the pre-checked cross-sales. I guess you can't have everything go right with a site.
The models here remind me a lot of models on the Met-Art type sites, thin, young, slender, very cute, some look a little more seasoned and pretty and even a few have tattoos, which surprised me, but isn't a negative.
There are three types of scenes here. Solo, lesbian and boy/girl. It's another rare comment for me to make in a review, the camerawork adds a lot to these scenes. I think it is most apparent on the cumshots. Most of these female models don't look like the type that are into having cum splattered across their face or on their bodies, but the camerawork shows it in full detail.
A bonus for me was I thought I only got this site and Wow Girls with my membership. Once inside the members area I also have access to All Fine Girls. I'm going to double up with a review of Wow Girls as I think these sites are important to each other.
There are just over 1,100 films and 700 photo sets. The films can be confusing if you look at the options too much. I just download the one I prefer and don't pay much attention to the details. They have scenes with 60 frames per second. I'm not technical enough to know what difference that makes and I watched one to see if I could see a difference, but couldn't.
I got the feeling as I was viewing the 3 different sites that this one has just kind of been merged into the other two, Wow Girls and All Fine Girls since they're all be offering as a package. I wanted to review this one separately to show it has stopped updating, but the other two and the network as a whole are still updating. It's a good site if you like sites like X-Art and Sex Art with maybe a little more harder content. All of the models, male and female are easy on the eyes too. Recommended as part of the network or even by itself. |
|
12-02-19 09:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a good collection of videos too.
Currently has 1,622 models
9,036 photo sets and 755 videos.
The videos are better than I expected them to be, while there's no full masturbation, there is light masturbation and full views of the models bodies.
Averages a photo update each day and a video update once per week. |
| Cons: |
Music in videos takes away the moaning -- if there is any moaning.
Site layout seems to have been changed. There is a button to go back to the old website style. The new or current style isn't real good to use with Edge Beta browser as the streaming player's function buttons are covered by the videographer's name and you click it when trying to fast forward, taking you to the videographer's page and stopping your video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to review Joymii and Femjoy at the same time as I got the sites confused, having a Adult Time account makes it more confusing since both are on Adult Time now in very limited sample sizes. I joined both Femjoy and Joymii as standalone sites not with Adult Time access.
I'm not a big picture collector, but this is my second time on Femjoy and I really like their photos. Their biggest size is 6000x4000 or vice versa and they are incredibly crisp photos for that large resolution.
The models are your regular European teen models, you do see some variety in body shapes and sizes, but in general, these are slim or slender models and they are nearly all very pretty. The videos are better than most artsy sites and they do show full pussy spreads and buttholes. You even get some rubbing, light touching and that helps keep this site's content out of the too softcore grouping.
There is nothing close to a balance of videos and photos as the photos near 10,000 sets while the videos haven't even reached 1,000. All are downloadable and there's no limits from as far as I can tell.
It's a good site, I like it better than Joymii which I believe is probably ran by the same company and if not they are very similar. I prefer these solo scenes when on the softer side of porn.
The video options are 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p, 270p. Their content dates all the way back to 2005. There are some models here with tattoos, but they are minimal and don't distract.
I do think if you are interested in this site it should be more for the photos than videos, even though I recommend streaming a few of the videos. I think they could be seen as fetish videos with the pretty women naked, touching themselves lightly, their natural arousal and positioning causing their pussies to open, but then again, I could see just about anyone saying the videos are too softcore.
A few site layout issues aside, it's a very good site overall and should make any photo collector happy. The photo sets are often more explicit than the videos. |
|
11-26-19 12:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
162
|
Joy Mii
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A pretty porn site where the models are all pretty and have a natural look.
Smaller than I expected with only 193 models, but they are 193 very pretty models.
720 video scenes and for some reason, 719 photo sets. All are downloadable and excellent quality.
I think it's important to stress how pretty and natural the models on here are. I haven't seen any implants and if there's tattoos, I've just missed them.
They have solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes.
Updates twice a week.
It has been around for a long time. I guess it's why I expected it to be a bigger site, but this could go into quality over quantity. |
| Cons: |
I didn't realize this is a softer hardcore site. A lot of the scenes in this softer hardcore genre just come off as generic to me and that is just an opinion.
It needs more variety. The scenes have these gorgeous models in them and it's like they're the sexy part and the sex is just the bonus.
The scenes are just straight to the point and short. Some are less than 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My pros/cons might look like I don't like this site, but it's not true. This is a good, very straightforward porn site with some really gorgeous models in hardcore action.
The site has been around for almost 10 years, so they have only averaged about 70 videos and 70 photo sets per year. What I find myself running into here is I find I model I really like and they only have a couple scenes of her, while other models have 10+ scenes. That is subjective to my taste, but it doesn't help me enjoy the site.
These are all professional models as far as I can tell. They look familiar and there are even a few big name models.
They have 350 male/female scenes and some of those are threesomes. The other 370 scenes are lesbian or solo. There's no way to separate the solo from lesbian scenes.
The navigation for the site works well except that they list solo and lesbian together. The model list isn't the most friendly, it is a vertical scrolling page with one model per section. Clicking on any model brings up a list of her scenes and photo sets.
The video quality is one of the brighter spots for the site. All videos have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 270p all in .MP4 and a 720p .WMV version. The streaming player works very well.
The photo sets have three downloadable versions, quickview 534x800, collector's edition 800x1200 and poster size 6000x4000. That's a big difference and the file sizes show it. The first two were 8-12 MB each, the poster size is 400 MB. These are photo sets, but they could pass for screen captures as they are from a video scene.
I would compare the site to Sex Art, X-Art, and just about any site with the word Art in it.
Whether my tone has sounded negative or not shouldn't go against the site. I am just a little disappointed in what I was expecting. It not a bad site, but I also don't think it's a great site. |
|
11-26-19 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
163
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous European models in solo and lesbian scenes.
Video updates 2-3 times per week and has 1,965 videos on it.
Photos update every 5 days and there are 3,208 photo sets.
Photo sets and videos are downloadable and there are no download restrictions.
Very easy to use site with sections/tabs for videos, photos, models.
There are 1,042 models and they include most of the biggest European stars of all-time. |
| Cons: |
While easy to use, there could be a better tagging system (there is not one) and a better way to separate solo/lesbian (there is not one).
Too many behind the scenes videos. In recent months, they have averaged 2 BTS videos for every 3 sex videos.
There used to be hardcore scenes on here, but I haven't found any. |
| Bottom Line: |
The content here is as hot as I've found when talking about lesbian porn. There is more kissing, more touching, more of everything considered foreplay than on most lesbian sites. There could be a question if this should be listed as a lesbian site as there are solo scenes (mostly in the past). The newer content is almost exclusively lesbian.
My favorite part of Viv Thomas at the current time is the return of some of the models that were around when I first started watching porn online (around 2006). Sandra Shine is producing some of the scenes and recently had a cameo in a scene with the very featured Liv Revamped. Blue Angel has also been in recent scenes. It's fun for me since I'm similar age to those two and remember watching their scenes over a decade ago. There are even cameos by Eve Angel and Viv Thomas.
The sex features some of the best camerawork as you can clearly see the tongues licking and sucking on clits, nipples, and twirling in each other's mouth. I feel like I've been missing out on this content. I had forgot about this site.
The navigation is very easy to use, but it doesn't give you any filtering/sorting options by category. The only sorting options are top rated, 4K, most viewed and most favorited. You have to scroll through to find solo for example. A filter to remove behind the scenes videos would be a good start too.
The video quality is excellent with 4K being available on the last 2 years (consistently) and up to 5 years (some scenes have 4K some don't), there's 720p and 1080p back until 2009. Which is a con I'm going to mention, but didn't list. In the scenes/videos section they only show videos back to 2014. Anything before then, you have to find them by going to the model's page and pulling them up from there. This is concerning for me since I don't know if the video count includes all the ones not listed in the scenes/videos or if it does.
That is my only major deduction from the site's score. I think it would be difficult for a person new to the site to find what they're looking for and as mentioned earlier, the hardcore scenes seem to be gone.
Looking beyond that if you like lesbian, panties, women kissing, women having passionate (looks rough in lesbian porn) sex with each other this is one of the best sites for it. |
|
11-25-19 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unique, interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes dumb, game sex scenes.
All amateurs and all exclusive.
Updates once per week, currently has 576 scenes on it.
Payment Processor is CCBill.
Wide variety of models by race and body type.
Covers solo, lesbian, male/female, group niches.
Doesn't feel staged. |
| Cons: |
Scenes can drag on before you get to the action.
There will definitely be some models (male and female) that everyone isn't attracted to. I see it as a plus. It adds to the authenticity.
No photos of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site after seeing a clip from it on a tube site. It's very straightforward. All games played have the strip basis. They have multiple games they play using everyday household objects to regular toys. It's like a modern take on strip poker. They mix it up by making you wonder if the loser is really the loser (guy has to give a beautiful amateur woman oral sex), they have fun in the scenes and you can see that. A lot of the models are shy and you can see the nervousness of having to take their clothes off. It just gives a good feeling of they are enjoying it even if it's embarrassing. I'm sure you could see similar games being played in dorm rooms, at adult parties and that makes this content fun for me. I could see myself getting stuck playing one of these games with a group of friends.
The video quality for an amateur site is excellent. No 4K, but they have 1080p going back to January 2014, the scenes prior to those have 720p. It is disappointing that they have no photos.
There's really nothing to the navigation since the scenes all have the same basis. The titles usually tell what game is being played. There are rock/paper/scissors scenes, scenes with a light duty taser directly pressed against the other person's pussy or dick and even the board game Battleship.
What I really like about it is they don't adhere to a very demanding strict order from scene to scene. Some scenes, the loser has to masturbate in front of the other or others. Sometimes that leads to more, sometimes everyone masturbates, you don't get the feeling you've seen every scene after watching one. I think that might be the most important trait for a site like this. The game part can become slow and dragging at times. One scene, the device they were using seemed to stop working and they had to improvise. Knowing that you might see something different as the game progresses keeps me watching. I enjoy the ones where it's a believably innocent young woman and she looks so embarrassed to drop her bra. You will even see blushes. There's no pressure from a demanding producer. It comes off as that rare organic porn.
The masturbation, sex, group or solo or couple is good. I wonder how well some of these models know each other. They at times seem very comfortable with each other and at other times they look like they can't believe they got themselves "into this mess". There aren't many of these types of sites with 100% amateurs and that helps the score too. Many amateur sites have an amateur female and pro or seasoned male. Here you get all amateurs and part of the enjoyment is watching how quickly they (men and women) get aroused. I like this site a lot as my score shows, but I could see it being frustrating for others that are impatient. I like to try and "play along" with the pace of the scene and find this a very stimulating erotic experience if you do it that way. |
|
11-25-19 09:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Family Strokes
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My favorite of the stepfamily sites. It's a Team Skeet premium site and does not include Team Skeet.
They have 246 scenes and add an average of 2 scenes per week. There is no update schedule. They will sometimes release 3-4 scenes in a week then go two weeks with no new updates, but it balances out to 7-8 new scenes per month.
Enjoyable scenes that are funny, sexy and play to a lot of taboo situations.
I have been a member on it twice and kept the membership 3 months each time. My downloading time is limited (thanks, stupid job). By the end of this membership, I will have downloaded every scene.
Doesn't stick to a gender dominant role like many of these taboo sites do. Some scenes are aunts "not really" as they point out, seducing nephews and others are uncles or stepdads seducing nieces and stepdaughters. Isn't even age dominant, as it's sometimes the younger one seducing the older one. |
| Cons: |
These Team Skeet premium sites are almost all excellent, but they don't have model lists that just show the models on that site. It shows all their content on all Team Skeet sites.
The storylines, enjoyable and fun, can be more unbelievable than the fake family angles. |
| Bottom Line: |
The taboo this site creates is not as high as many stepfamily sites. Most of the actors and actresses would be more believable if they didn't have scripted actions and words. There is one where the stepfather walks into a room his stepdaughter is in. He's holding his towel on with his erection. The stepdaughter giggles and says, "Nice towel rack". If you're missing the humor there, she's not even bothered that her stepfather walked into her bedroom with an erection.
You get the cliched lines like, "Is that for me?" and my favorite, when the erect dick shows itself and the daughter, niece, aunt, stepmom jumps back like she has no idea what it is. I am put off by rough and violent porn so this silly, cliched and funny porn is a much more welcome style for me.
You won't likely have a complaint about any of the models looks, bodies or action. These models on the Team Skeet premium sites seem to be the top-level of their models, the scenes are long and even though 246 scenes isn't a lot, it is for this type or premium content and these sites are relatively inexpensive.
A few examples of what to expect from the scenes here: My Stepdaughter the Escort, the stepfather hires an escort, meets her at the hotel and surprise, it's his stepdaughter. Under the Table Footplay, as the stepdaughter plays footsie with her stepdad's dick under the kitchen table while the mom is sitting there. On that one, they could make it so serious that it could be believable, but instead they have the stepdaughter smiling and twirling her hair while staring at the stepfather and ignoring her mom.
They also do parodies. I think it's one of their most popular scenes and it was just released a few weeks ago of The Addams Family, with the whole main cast of the old television show/movies getting in on a family orgy. They have a Family Guy scene that features the human look-a-like cast members of the popular animated show having an orgy.
The scenes all clock in at around or over 30 minutes each. There are photos and screencaps for each scene along with the video and all are downloadable. These premium sites have one distinct advantage and that is the navigation. Everything is easy to find.
The only people I wouldn't recommend the site to are those that need a believable stepfamily story. These are fantasy scenes. The lowest rated scenes on the site are the ones where they have tried to go more serious. Those are in the 70-80% liked range, while the silly, playful ones are almost all over 90% liked.
Very enjoyable site and one I will continue to come back to every 6 months. |
|
11-18-19 11:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly hardcore network in the Nubiles family of sites.
Most of the scenes are very unique and interesting.
A little over 1,200 scenes with photos, all are downloadable.
Updates every other day.
Model list, different site tabs, it all makes navigating this network much easier than you would expect.
Bills with CCBill |
| Cons: |
There's a lot of imbalance. Some sites on here, the niches they cover are very interesting, other ones feel just like any other softer hardcore site.
I still feel like Nubiles.net is better than all these sites combined. I'm not trying to compare them, I just think Nubiles.net captures the Nubile feeling, while this is more like a hardcore site that's trying to go away from the tried and true forum Nubiles.net established. |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit, I am a sucker for the "family" porn and they have a couple of those sites on here Stepsiblings Caught, Daddy's Lil Angel and Family Pies. I like the porn with stories more than the gonzo style. Or else I just feel like two people showed up, picked a check up and got naked. I want and even need a scene to convince me this is really happening and it's not because they're being paid.
Nubiles Porn does a good job of that most of the time. There are more sites, really just niches, in this network that I like than ones I don't like. Detention Girls reminds me of every lesbian porn I first saw when I first discovered porn. Who knew "Women in jail" a search topic for a research paper would bring up a porn site?
I think if there's one strong criticism it is that they don't let the scenes play out enough. There are exceptions and that's what hurts. There's a scene on Nubiles Porn called, "My Sexy Girlfriend S12 E:7" that is really great. The model is self-shooting herself in the car, teasing her boyfriend and they even make sure to have her film in portrait view which is one of the most annoying things a person can do, but it adds to the realism. This teasing and flirting takes up nearly half the scene and it makes it very believable. Other scenes start with the woman on the bed naked and the guy walks in the room naked. They don't even say hi.
The video quality is very good at up to 1080p and they offer something I like, they have a 720p version in mp4 and WMV, I can't see the difference in them and the WMV version is usually 200-300 MB less in size. The photos like nubiles.net are very crisp and clear and downloadable.
They have just over 850 models and some of what I would call the top level of teen models.
There are quite a few niches here including two in the petite niche and you also get access to Nubiles.net, which to me is the best teen site on the internet.
I got this membership during the Halloween deals and didn't expect to get Nubiles.net with it, but it does come with it. For whatever reason they don't list it on the Nubiles Porn page, you just have to type in nubiles.net and enter you login again. It think when it's all combined it's still the best deal I've found in porn. |
|
11-04-19 11:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Hard X
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The hardcore site from Empire X, it's one of the better hardcore sites I've been a member of.
Very attractive models for a hardcore site.
Update schedule isn't clear, but they had 8 new scenes in October. There are 661 scenes total.
They have 9 resolutions to download the videos in, ranging from 160p to 4K, the older scenes have 1080p as the max.
Nice photo sets with zip downloads. |
| Cons: |
There's still a feeling of repetitiveness in the scenes.
I don't know if it's a concern, but they went 11 days between the most recent update and the previous one, October 25th and November 5th. |
| Bottom Line: |
I felt the combination of reviewing their softer EroticaX site and this one, the harder HardX site would be an interesting way to compare the sites and styles.
I'm not a huge hardcore fan, but I do like the hardcore on HardX, is it because it has a softer edge to it? I don't think so. Maybe it's the high production quality?
They don't stray too far from their formula on their other sites. They focus on three main themes. The male/female scene, the male/male/female scene and the blowbang type scene where one woman gives blowjobs to multiple guys (more than 5 usually).
The threesome scenes are some of the best threesomes I have seen. You usually get the feeling in a threesome there's too much going on to really show it all, but they do feature dual penetration in most of their threesomes (anal and vaginal) not anal/vaginal and oral. Most of the women seem to really enjoy these scenes which is rare in my experience of viewing threesomes where the women usually look like a deer in headlights.
The blowbang scenes are good even if you do wonder if the woman's mouth gets tired. That's what we practice for when we're doing all that talking!
The male/female scenes seem a lot like the content on EroticaX, which I didn't like as well. There's still not a lot of variation in the setting. Someone with a white couch and white bedroom set is not going to be happy.
There are 661 scenes on this site which is double that of EroticaX and I have downloaded quite a bit more from HardX, the scoring difference between the two might not have been enough. I might have to lower EroticaX's score to show how much more I like HardX.
The navigation and tags work as well as they've marked them. I really don't know how much those tags can be trusted to be accurate. I haven't seen a mention of white couch and it's in every scene.
I think this site would be good enough to join EmpireX just for this site. It's very good overall and I have downloaded nearly 100 scenes from it, most are threesomes.
I do think it's impressive that they get so many very pretty models to be in these hard scenes. I would call it the best reason to join EmpireX, but overall, I do believe they should work on mixing the settings up a little, other than that it's a great deal for all you get. |
|
11-04-19 10:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly polished, glam with a story, porn.
Includes access to 3 other sites, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Very high quality and production quality, reminds me a little of the Met-Art sites.
Cliched stories are better than no stories.
Videos are downloadable in 9 different resolutions, starting with 160p and going up to 4K. Maybe I will ask Santa for a 4K monitor this year? The oldest scenes have up to 1080p.
Updates once a week and has 319 scenes on it. |
| Cons: |
It would seem like pictures would be important to a site like this, but the photo sets are limited in number of photos but they do have downloads (corrected error, missed the button).
I have noticed with these softer "hardcore" sites, sometimes the action just falls very flat. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think I'm still earning my porn rookie badge. I joined this site thinking it was a standalone site. To my surprise, those other 3 sites come with it and as a whole, it's a very good deal.
The content here is like reading an erotica book that your neighbor's wife authored. That's not really a bad thing, maybe she's the next Anais Nin? The stories were a selling point for me, but I probably expected too much.
As an example from the newer scenes. Featuring the gorgeous Vina Sky, her boyfriend broke up with her via text message. She calls her best male friend for a shoulder to cry on and realizes she's been in love with the best friend the whole time. Doesn't that contradict the heartbreak she has? She ended up with the guy she's really in love with.
So, maybe your neighbor's wife isn't the next Anais Nin, after all. It's still better than no story. The scenes are very serious feeling. There's not a lot of feeling of raw emotions or passion. It's not bad, but it just seems a little stale like a two day old doughnut.
There's very little variation in the scenes. Most are male/female, there are some solo and lesbian scenes, but in my opinion, not enough of either of those. I think with this narrow of a niche there should be a near equal balance in solo (fantasizing), lesbian (fantasizing and real), male/female (real). It would add more of a connected feel to the scenes.
The quality of the videos are excellent, but I'm not going to compliment the settings too much. It looks like all these couples and people rented the same hotel room. They must have blew the budget on those stories.
I streamed most of these scenes which isn't the best sign. A few are worth downloading, but most of them started feeling repetitive.
I don't understand why they don't have more pictures. I'm not a picture collector or downloader, but I can usually look at the pictures and combine them with what I see in the video to make more of a connection to the scene.
It's good, what I would call safe porn. It's not going to make you think you're witnessing a revolution in porn, but it's good enough to get off to, a time or two. I do think with the 3 other sites combined as a 4 site network it's a very good deal. I'm going to review the opposite site from their network just to show a completely different experience. |
|
11-04-19 09:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
169
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Going directly to the site shows no dates, but the first one posted is Redhead in the Forest. I want to say that might be newer. The same male and female have a re-creation of Lil' Red Riding Hood where the guy is dressed up like the big, bad wolf. That scene was released as a "bonus" scene recently. The Redhead in the Forest looks like after they took their costumes off. The next listed one is Kendra Fucked at a Sex Party, which doesn't look like outside, they are on a bed. The one before it was Jesse Storm Fucked on the Patio and the one before it was Highway to Fuck.
|
10-29-19 03:32pm
|
Review
170
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Canadian hardcore porn network that I received an email promo from.
22 sites included, some are very small.
232 models with some of most unique tags I have seen for models.
A little over 750 main scenes, around 280 bonus scenes.
Some of the scenes have photos and they are downloadable, but contain 20-25 photos in the ones I've looked at.
I think there's a theme or story connecting one scene to another and it's why there are bonus scenes, but the navigation isn't helping me out any. |
| Cons: |
Kind of heavy on the ads. There's a large one at the top, one on the bottom of the main page. Once inside the videos or updates page, there's a large one right in the middle of the content.
There is a listing for bonus sites. It is in French with no English option and I would rather not risk signing in with my login details since I don't know what it says.
Got me with a pre-checked sign-up to a site I had never heard of and that was in all French. I was able to cancel it instantly and only lost $2.95 for it, but what is it with the French-only sites? |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the sites I joined in the past since me a special promo for this Pegas Productions network and it looked interesting.
And it is interesting. The models from the best I can tell are amateurs. The sites or categories included are:
3 Way Porn, Banging Family, Blow Me POV, Chic and Chix, Cutie Pussies, Fun Size Teens, Fresh and Innocent, Inked Gurlz, JizzOrama, Kummalot, Let's Fuck Outside, Lezzie BFF, Lust Eden, Nasty Rookies, Samantha Ardente, Sexy Knockers, Shake the Snake, Sly Masseur, Spice My Sex Life, Straight in the Ass and TranniesRus.
I can't figure out if each site has a story going on from scene to scene or if these are DVDs that are split into parts or what.
Their site Inked Gurlz reminds me a lot of Burning Angel and AltErotica.
The rest of the sites seem just like each one is just a niche and they're calling it a site. The site has been around for over 10 years, but only has around 800 scenes.
I would rate most of the scenes as average scenes. Most of the women look like amateurs and are mostly cute types. The guys look like professional wrestlers.
I watched some of the more specific scenes like, "Shit! My Stepdaughter is a stripper!" The scene starts with the stepdad in the stepdaughter's room looking in her nightstand. He finds sparkly, shiny clothes and says, "Shit! My daughter-in-law is a stripper!" That's not a typo or mistake by me. The scene says "stepdaughter", the script of the scene is "daughter-in-law". The father-in-law, who looks as young as the daughter-in-law, walks around mumbling about wait until my son finds out about this. The daughter-in-law comes in, seduces him and has sex with him.
That is really poor production standards. First, the mistake with the naming of the scene and role of the female. Then, the dad talking about how upset his son is going to be, has sex with her and she's not even attractive.
It's a disappointing site for me. The older videos are in poor quality even though it says they are HD. As mentioned, several options take you to pages in French, they got me with a cross sale that I still haven't seen and it was of a movie site in French. I found a few scenes I liked. The newer ones are 1080p. The bonus scenes from watching a few look to be BTS and nearly all dialogue is in French. There is a cameraman talking in most of these scenes. The actors in the scene are talking, laughing and I'm wondering what they're even saying.
Those unique tags for the models might even explain some of the frustration. Here is how they have their models tagged and separated - Fruity & Spicy, Light and Flexible, Young and Delicate, Bodied and Curvy, Aromatic and Alluring, Vibrant and Zesty. It is a porn site or a coffee and pastry house?
I think it could be a good site, but as it is, it's only okay. |
|
10-29-19 01:22am
Replies (3)
|
Review
171
|
Social Glamour
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models.
Current Halloween promo for $14.99
Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty.
I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star.
Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400.
Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. |
| Cons: |
Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019.
Not near as much nudity as I expected.
Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background.
40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that.
We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?"
It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site.
I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn.
I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan...
Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris.
All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range.
The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless.
I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it.
The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes.
A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around.
I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p.
I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me.
It also hasn't updated in 7 months.
There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. |
|
10-28-19 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
172
|
Bi Maxx
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Male, male, female bisexual scenes, groups and orgies.
It's a narrow niche that usually fails to deliver, but Bi Maxx is the best I've seen of the niche.
Over 350 scenes, I can't give an exact number as will be explained in the first con.
Standard for the times, 480p, 720p and 1080p options to download.
The best looking models (male and female) you will see in MMF bisexual scenes.
Includes access to Sinx's sample videos from more than 20 sites. |
| Cons: |
Bi Maxx was easy to navigate the last time I was on it (2016). It's now filled with the most confusing navigation I've seen on a site.
No update schedule, I didn't download any videos from here in 2016, so I don't know how new these scenes are.
Expensive €29.99, about $32 in USD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bi Maxx offers a niche that could be confusing to some porn fans. Usually when we hear of a bisexual threesome we think of two women with a man, but Bi Maxx has two men with a woman. There's a unique, but also formulaic feel to these scenes. I'm not a porn producer, but I would think you have to get a certain amount of time with the woman having sex with one or both men, time with the men having sex with each other, role (top and bottom) being flipped and there's the confusion of who is going to take the cumshots.
Bi Maxx has a distinct advantage over the two other bisexual men sites I know of, they are owned by the same company that owns Tainster. They have full access to a stable of beautiful female models and many of them appear in these scenes.
I know looks are subjective, but most bisexual male scenes have an average looking female in them. Some of the females in these scenes could easily be A-list European models. I have reviewed several Tainster sites and one thing all have in common is the acting ability. These females seem to be very aroused by watching two men have sex with each other. It's not uncommon in this niche to see women that look bored or even uninterested.
The video quality is very good. There are photo sets too.
Then, the problems start. Sinx is either the new owner of the Tainster sites or it's just a name Tainster is using to signify a change in direction. They have videos (usually 5-20) from other paysites that have no direct connection to them or the content you bought.
The very first time I joined "Tainster" it was called EroMax, Bi Maxx was included with the sites that you now get with a Tainster membership. Now, Bi Maxx has been removed from Tainster and requires a second membership.
You click videos and see the typical porn site page with 15-20 videos, click a button to see more, click a number to go to the next page and you find yourself with several hundred scenes. The confusion returns. There is a section called "channels" it has what to me are 48 DVDs or themed series. These have between 2-4 scenes on each one. I can't tell if these are the same scenes on the videos page. It shows one picture. There's two naked guys and a naked woman, many of them don't show their faces and they don't list their names.
Want some more confusion? When you click on one to view it, it says you have to pay $2.99 to view it. This is a complete mess. The Tainster site works well enough on Sinx, but Bi Maxx seems to be their version of a money pit. Have we reached that part of porn's era where supply and demand will control the pricing of rare niches?
More so than the Tainster videos, these videos being European filmed and featuring European actors and actresses show a major problem with the language barrier.
If a man and woman are having sex you really don't need a story to understand why they are having sex. Even a man, female and female. Then, you watch these scenes and one of the men looks like he's not into it. Why? I can't understand what he says. The acting is good enough in all scenes Tainster films to make it where you can read body language. Could they maybe put subtitles? Or explain what the channels section is for?
One last part on the channels section. They are named just like the Bi Maxx scenes, like, "Bisex Party: Always bet on Bi" but I have to pay extra for those? I'm giving it an 80 for the quality of models, filming and feeling I could give it a 60 for being so damned confusing. |
|
10-14-19 09:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Sapphix
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Includes 3 female-centric sites, Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush. A total of 2,400 scenes. These include a video and high-quality photo set. You may download all.
They have 1,150 of the prettiest women I have ever laid my eyes on.
Billing company changes, I sometimes get Rocketgate, sometimes Epoch, both are easy to use and cancel.
Video quality on Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink is excellent.
Tagging system is one of the best in the business.
Sapphic Erotica has group scenes, always at least 2 women and Give Me Pink is always solo. |
| Cons: |
Fist Flush has not been updated since 2018 and only has 77 scenes on it, the content they have is good, but if you're only joining for it know ahead of time it's not being updated.
There's some serious gay for pay going on, some of the scenes feel like neither woman wants to be there. |
| Bottom Line: |
When Sapphix was created it was one of the greatest days in female-centric porn. You get the archive site Fist Flush for those into the rougher fisting (only girls, no guys), you get Sapphic Erotica, one of the greatest lesbian sites ever created and you get Give Me Pink, a solo, but hardcore solo site.
The video quality and options are as good as any site I have seen.
Sapphic Erotica has been offering 4K downloads on every scene since October 2015. If you don't want 4K they also offer 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They have been offering 1080p since 2007!
Give Me Pink has been offering 4K downloads since November 2015 and those also come with 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They too have been offering 1080p since 2007.
Fist Flush's few newer updates offer 4K and all of their past scenes have 1080p, 720p and 540p.
Each scene includes a photo set that is up to 3000 resolution. These can be downloaded as zip files.
Gay for pay does hamper some of the scenes, but I would estimate it at less than 15% of the scenes. Most of the scenes on Sapphic Erotica are believable enough to make a girl wonder about the talk of bi-curious.
Give Me Pink could be a little much for some as there are extreme insertions, but I have noticed those are in the older scenes. The newer scenes are more standard "hard masturbation".
Fist Flush is a site about fisting. I'm not really into this scenes myself -- they even have anal fisting.
It does offer a varied selection from scene to scene, the kissable, lovable, innocent tribbing of the cute, pretty and even beautiful lesbians on Sapphic Erotica, the harder masturbation of the Give Me Pink girls and the whole fist of Fist Flush.
The tagging system here is really incredible. As many as you want can be used at one time.
It starts with Categories - here you have anal, kissing, 69 and 26 other choices.
Now you get Locations - They have living room, outdoors, pool and 9 other locations.
Next is Face Type - baby face, slutty, butch and 6 more types of faces
Bringing Ethnicity in now - Exotic, Hispanic, Caucasian and Black
How about Hair Color - redhead, brunette, blonde and 3 more
Need more for hair fetishes, Hair Style - short, long-curly, long-straight and 4 more
Can't forget those sexy Eyes - blue, grey, brown and green
What about the body art - tattoos, piercings, branding and glasses
Like some Pubic Hair - shaved, trimmed, hairy
Can't forget the pussy/labia type - small, medium, meat curtains (really?), big clit
Ethnicity wasn't enough, Skin Tone - light, medium, dark, tan-lines
Thought they forgot the Breasts - natural, flat, floppy, fake, perky, large, teardrop, medium
But don't forget the Butt - thick, bubble butt, apple, average and flat
What good are those without Body Type - athletic, curvy, MILF, petite, tall, barely legal and more
Who needs Clothes - costume, bikini, jeans, hot pants, dress, heels, sneakers, fully naked(invisible clothes?), leggings, hose, stockings, pajamas and more.
Last is the site - Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink, Fist Flush
You can go through all those options and mark everyone you want to see and it will filter down to the scenes with everything you marked. I think it's why I like the site so much. There is no guessing. You can literally select what you want to see and it will be there.
Sapphic Erotica has 1,798 scenes, Give Me Pink has 391 scenes, Fist Flush has 77 scenes and they do have interviews, but there are only 59 of those.
In my opinion, they have the best all-around experience in porn -- the quality, the quantity, the excellent tagging system and the quality of models. |
|
10-14-19 08:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
174
|
Team Skeet
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good network if you follow one step: Click "show my content" in the left margin. It removes all the locked content.
My biggest interest was Innocent High. As a former Catholic schoolgirl, I have something of a fetish towards schoolgirl content.
They have 3,551 scenes available with the standard Team Skeet membership. If you were to update to all their upgrade sites it would add another 1,500 scenes.
The scenes I have watched stuck to the main theme of each site. That could be a con too.
The video quality goes from 360p up to 1080p, no 4K that I can see.
The picture sets are downloadable.
The girls on here are mostly really cute/pretty. The guys are guys I see on other sites.
Epoch is the biller. |
| Cons: |
They really could do something with the navigation. If you click "show my content" it takes away all the locked content. But, if you look at their sites, they have 47, there's no way to know which ones you have access to. I recognize a few of them as standalone sites like Family Strokes. They even have a filter on the sites, but not one for "show my sites".
I'm with some of the others, why not just offer all the sites in one package and even raise the price? I can't imagine what the price would be to add those sites as an upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High was one of the first porn sites I was interested in. I spent the majority of my teen years wearing schoolgirl outfits and I really believe it has a sexual effect on the wearer. Those scenes are good, but they could be a lot better.
I won't say the content has a generic feel to it, but it kind of does. What I mean by that is it feels like they film a scene, pull the model out of the clothes, stick another model in the clothes and do it again.
Their site Family Strokes is really entertaining. It's kind of silly and it has a lot more personality than some of the sites included with Team Skeet. I would say I would be willing to pay $49 for all of their sites. If anyone knows how much that upgrade is, please let me know.
The Stepsibilings site is the best of their newer sites that come with the Team Skeet standard membership. All of the sites have some good scenes on them, but you have to click on them and see if you need to upgrade.
The video quality is very good as is the streaming player. It's one of the better streaming players I have used.
I don't like focusing so much of the review on the negative of the navigation, but it does make the site very hard to use. Once you click on "Show my content", you have no other options except to scroll through 3,500 scenes.
I am a fan of CFNM and they have a CFNM site on here. It's not the standard CFNM style content. It's one on one and usually ends in sex.
Here are the sites from the top 10 sites they have that are included in the basic membership:
Exxxtra Small, Teen Pies, Teen Curves, Innocent High, Stepsiblings, I'm going to stop here for an important part. Those are in the top 10 of their listed sites. That means you receive 5 of their top 10 sites with a standard membership.
After those, there's only one upgrade site in the next 10. You receive 14 of the top 20.
While I was going through those results, I did notice an upgrade button and it says if you choose the upgrade you are charged annually. That makes it not as likely to interest me. I would be better off just joining each of the upgrade sites I am interested in for one month at $10 each.
I wouldn't be interested in their upgrade sites if they had poor content. They have some really fun and sexy content. I have enjoyed it so far and think I will make a list of the sites they list as upgrades and just join one each month.
This is a mostly teen network. There are some MILF sites on it, but even those have a teen in them. I like it as much or better than the other American networks I have joined. Good, fun network and I guess I should give them a nice word for not charging the upgrades automatically like other sites do. I have clicked on multiple upgrades and there is a green button that says "upgrade now". They're at least fair with it. |
|
10-08-19 01:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
09-30-19 11:11pm (Update History)
Reason: Graded it on streaming abilities, original review was more frustrated with their lie on their join page.
|
| Pros: |
Network of 6 sites, a fitness site, a massage site, a MILF site, a hardcore site and two lesbian sites.
The content looks very good, but I was tricked by a promotional offer from them. I can't download anything.
There are 471 models on the network with most looking like pros.
The download options for videos show 360p to 1080p
They have photo sets that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
The join screen said unlimited downloads. Once inside, it told me I had to pay $14.95 to download. Anyone could go to the site right now, click join and you will see the unlimited downloads banner with no asterisk or fine print.
It looks like most of it is very normal porn. The promo showed fitness scenes that looked like group environments, but the scenes on the site don't look that way. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to rewrite this bottom line. I still am upset by the promotion of unlimited downloads only to find out they come at an extra charge.
I will give a basic overview of what you get. You can stream the videos and look at the photos.
Dane Jones is a standard hardcore site with 698 scenes, it updates 3 times per week.
Lesbea is a standard lesbian site with 600 scenes, it updates 1-2 times per week, 6 updates in September.
Massage Rooms has both scenarios of massages, men massaging women, women massaging men and sex. It has 528 scenes and updated 6 times in September.
MomXXX is a MILF site with straight sex and lesbian sex, it only updated twice in September.
Fitness Rooms is an exercise and exercise clothing fetish hardcore site. It has 163 scenes and updated twice in September.
Girlfriends is a lesbian site, more college-type age models and has 204 scenes. It updated 3 times in September.
The download options are 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p, you have to pay $14.95 for them. I feel like I'm writing a repeat review of Mofos. There's good quality content here. The Girlfriends site is really good.
There are hardly no ads in the member's area. The site works well, you can browse by site or by network update. You can browse by model. They have an excellent tagging system. Everything is in place for a top-tier site except telling you that you get unlimited downloads then saying you have to pay $14.95 for them.
I felt like Mofos might be worth paying the extra for on the downloads, but this Sexy Hub site doesn't feel like it is. This feels like a site that should be around $15 and it should include downloads.
I've developed a frustrated feeling with these sites. I'm not even a regular downloading type member, but I have noticed most Porn User members are. It does say in the TBP review that downloads cost extra, but it said unlimited downloads on the join page.
To add to this, I went through the cancel by chat process and it took nearly 25 minutes. The rep asked me why I was canceling. I told him/her I was going out of town and didn't want to forget it. The rep then told me they found an expired promo they would let me have for $72 a year. I thanked them, but told them I would rather not join long-term. They disconnected the chat. A few minutes later I received a cancellation email. I will try to avoid joining sites with this biller from now on. |
|
09-30-19 10:06pm
Replies (1)
|
|
