They add the bonus Sinx content which has scenes from - French Fuck Friends, Real Agent, UK Fuck Friends, Asian Sex Diary, Lil Miss Arab, Worldwide Wanking, Trike Patrol, Tuk Tuk Patrol, three different German sites, retro, gonzo and fetish.
That's the part that gets confusing. Some of these scenes you can watch and download. Some you have to pay $3.95 each or $7.95 for the whole niche.
As varied as Tainster's sites are you would think they wouldn't add more to their network to confuse you.
These sites -- in my opinion -- have either lost content from the past or they've combined scenes.
Their promos have also changed. I originally went to sign up with a $9.95 per month promo. The best deal it would give me was 23.99 Euro.
The best sites on the network, for me, are Fully Clothed Sex, Fully Clothed Pissing and Slime Wave. Each of these focus on the women models in business type clothes and they're either getting their clothes were from cum, piss or someone throwing water on them. It's a little more fetish-based than I normally would go for, but the production values are very good even without subtitles.
More than anything this feels like European porn. It doesn't have the personality of a lot of American porn, but it has a higher level of eroticism. The My Fetish site is an easy to overlook one and maybe it should be. The scenes seem to be the fetish of someone we don't know and that doesn't really tell us what the fetish is. These scenes to include people having sex in public with other, dressed people sitting around.
Comparing it to my past subscriptions to Tainster, I have to admit, I don't prefer this new version. Some of the bonus content is good, but the majority of it has to be bought and I'm confident they have removed anywhere from 100-200 scenes from each of their sites. It is still worth a membership, but your expectations should be tempered by the knowledge of knowing things have changed.
With no update schedule and no dated content it does kind of feel like they are not updating any of the sites. One of the newest updates doesn't have any HD options, not 720p, not 1080p, while the 6 previous scenes had both 720p and 1080p. As a whole it is a good network for those into kinkier content, but I won't be sticking around for more than a month. By the way, the biller canceled fast and with no problems even though I had not heard of them before.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs.
Cons:
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues.
Bottom Line:
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well.
Cons:
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition.
Bottom Line:
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I thought I would hate it, but I think I love it. Extremely erotic site with fake dicks and fake cum.
Gloryhole setup on most scenes, some do not, makes the fake dick seem less fake.
The performances by the women!
Watching something that looks disgusting becoming sexy is erotic to me.
Most of the scenes have the model in clothes making the ensuing mess even more messy and fun to watch.
Cons:
It's a small site, only 170 scenes, but I haven't watched a bad one yet.
The multiple women scenes gets too confusing, fake dicks, fake cum, slime blasting, four women, the ones with one woman gives a more focused view.
No dates on scenes, they have added one new scene to this site in the last 2 weeks.
Bottom Line:
In a lot of ways this might be my most excited review. I have seen WAM (wet and messy) porn and fake dick, fake cum scenes, but this site takes it to a whole other level.
The women, the camerawork of focusing right where they need to focus, the slime (fake cum) dripping off the model's face, down to her thigh, sliding up to her pussy lips, it's some of the most erotic porn I have ever watched.
These models should not be this excited should they? The fake dick squirts them at high impact, anywhere from 5-10 times in one scene. The aiming of the fake cum adds to it. In one scene, the blast of fake cum hits the model's clit at full impact. She looks like she's in orgasmic bliss.
The scenes have no story to them. It's just like a random gloryhole scene. The first few scenes I watched I had to look twice to see that those are dildos. The cum or slime blast let's you know for sure. Some of the models are covered head to toe in slime by the end of the scenes. They love every blast of it.
Maybe I feel a little biased. The first one I watched was probably the best scene on the site. The model with a skirt and hose on, rubbed the slime on her pussy and as she was doing it, a second blast hit her in the mouth. It is like these models are channeling their inner beliefs these are real men all cumming for them.
The videos are clear even the 720p ones. They have 1080p too. The pictures add a new element of showing the fast action frame by frame.
I'm not curious if other sites exist that do this on this high of a level. I watched one years ago and the women were giggling at the fake cum. Maybe it's the European models that are more convincing?
This is a hard site to recommend to others, but it does come with access to Tainster and a selection of videos from Sinx. I would have been happy with just this site. That's how much I like this content.
If you can look over the fake dicks and fake cum to watch sexy women in usually tight clothes, get soaked with slime, it really is worth a try.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A fetish-dominated site on a network that keeps changing.
The scenes often feature full sex from start to finish in full clothes. You can learn some sneaky tips for making it work in clothes.
The women on here are beautiful. It has a heavy emphasis on Eastern European women. The guys are okay, a few are not much to look at.
There is a lot of content on just this site within this niche. They also have a site called, Fully Clothed Pissing. It looks like they film the pissing part either before or after the sex scene. It is usually the same models in the same clothes.
I think it's a niche that women are really into -- cum on clothes, they have a lot of scenes with the cumshot going on the woman's skirt, her pants and it's one of the selling points for me.
Cons:
Tainster is the network, but it is now in a network called SINX. It adds more content than just Tainster, but it also comes with a lesser known biller.
Some of the guys are just ugly and I don't think it would be a subjective opinion. I'm not that picky.
No dates on the videos. The only way you can tell the newer ones is by the video resolution offered.
Bottom Line:
Tainster has had a lot of changes over the last 10 years. It was one of the first networks I joined. It was known as Eromaxx back then. The switch to Tainster didn't change anything. This switch to SINX shows a lot of videos from other sites that are upsells. It does let you select a site like Fully Clothed Sex and just see the content from it.
These scenes have been a turn-on for me since my first porn experiences. The cum on clothes just seems like something everyone that has had sex has experienced at least once -- and these women love it.
The site works as well as it did under Tainster. The scenes are lined up and I think, from looking at them, they are in order of newest to oldest. What I don't know is if they are releasing new scenes or what their update schedule is if there even is one.
The most recent 286 scenes have "Full HD" 1080p downloading option. That is where it can be confusing. I went as far as their last page of videos and 4 of the 8 have Full HD 1080p. Some of the videos on the "newer" pages don't have Full HD 1080p. The ones with Full HD option offer 720p and 360p as well. There are pictures with every video.
Some of these scenes are a fantasizer's dream come true. Office girls using dildos on each other through the tear in their hose. The "boss" man seducing a young interviewing model into sex with his penis out of the front of his pants, her panties slid over and on top of him.
This is one site that I don't think amateurs would be good at. These models -- though, I only know some by name -- are pros, and they seem to have real fetishes involving these scenarios.
The total amount of scenes is 362. Reading the The Best Porn review from 2015, there were over 400 scenes. This site has been around since 2003. Seeing that none of the scenes look very old, I have to wonder if they've just removed a lot of their older, lower-quality content?
The lower number doesn't hurt it, in my opinion, I would rather have 300 scenes in high quality than 600 with half the scenes in poor quality.
One of the fetishes they do well and a lot on this site is a man/woman having sex while a woman watches and masturbates. Having them all in clothes makes that even better. There are a lot of fetishes being touched on in this site. You have pantyhose, panties, upskirts and voyeuristic watchers.
You do have access to all of the Tainster sites including Party Hardcore and the aforementioned Fully Clothed Pissing. I'm not into pissing scenes, but they do add to the Fully Clothed Sex scenes as you are seeing the same people, in the same clothing, doing something different and kinky.
I won't score it too high just because the missing dates and no update schedule makes me wonder if the site is dead and they're using it is an archive site. If it is, it is still worth it for those with those clothing fetishes.
Females are mostly young, but there are chubbier models, slimmer models and various races.
Cons:
The other reviews I've read said they are recycling content. I didn't know what that meant. I'm not for sure they are. One of the newest scenes is of Allie Addison. I saw her on ALS Scan and they were saying it's her first year in porn. Some might be recycled or they may have removed some, but for this niche this is a lot of content.
I was frustrated with Rocketgate which caused the problem I had to contact the site's customer service about.
Bottom Line:
This is your standard handjob site, but there is a lot more going on here. Some of the models get on top of the guy and tease their vagina against the male's penis. Some slide the guy's penis up and down between their butt cheeks. Others stick the penis between their boobs and some turn into oral and oral teasing.
The more advanced scenes seem to be over the last 3-4 years. Maybe people/fans complained that the handjob action was getting repetitive. The different types of scenes really makes this site excellent.
The models are all in the better looking to very pretty group. That is not common in this niche.
The sites that come with blend in too. Mr. POV is POV sex, if you get tired of watching handjobs you can watch sex from the perspective of the camera. The other is The Dick Suckers. It's a lot like Mano Job except you're going to see oral in every scene. The sites combined have around 1,400 scenes total.
I like it a lot. There is a good amount of focus on the man and his enjoyment. The models all look to be having fun and the scenes with more than just a handjob are better than hardcore sex scenes for me.
The download options are unique. You can download on 1080p, 720p, Web Version, Mobile Version, Cumshot only or Exclusive Interview. You can also stream another option -- the slo-mo cumshot. You can make a playlist with your favorite scenes in it so they play in a row. You can favorite your favorite models.
The site is simple to use. It has a dropdown box to change the site you are viewing. The model index can be viewed in alphabetical order and when you click on a model it shows you all of her scenes on each of their sites.
The models are usually in skimpy clothing, but some wear regular looking outfits, some are topless in the scenes, some are fully nude, it kind of is the pattern on this site. They are covering a lot of bases.
They do tag most of their scenes as J.O.E. sometimes tagged on other sites as J.O.I. J.O.E is jerk off encouragement. I haven't seen any scenes with insults from the women. That is a plus for me. I like to see both people enjoying themselves not one belittling the other.
This will go into my very short list of favorite sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A variation of solo-based sites with some extreme insertions, outdoor scenes and cute girls.
Some of the models make me feel old, but that is okay. The models on this site are slim, few maybe none have implants and they do seem to enjoy themselves.
The site has improved by leaps and bounds in how it works. I was a member here many years ago. It used to be hard to find anything. It now is one of the simplest sites to use.
Most of the models have more than one scene or photoset. There are 424 models total with nearly 3,000 videos and over 3,000 photosets. I like when a site does this instead of having a new model in every scene.
The impromptu lesbian scenes are my favorite lesbian scenes I have seen.
Cons:
The sign-up and entrance as a new member could be easier. You have a whole page of other sites the Met-Art network offers to pick as add-on sites. There is a link to bypass it, but it is one line of text compared to 8 or more large photos for the other sites.
The staff selection picks are on here just like on Sex Art and they are the same scenes. You have to pay extra for those.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined ALS Scan, I thought ALS was the name of the producer of the content. ALS means All Ladies Shaved.
The content is mostly solo. My favorite scenes on here are the ones with more than one person, but the other person or multiple people are not fully interacting. Those scenes give you the feeling the model just decided to masturbate even with clothed people sitting around her. It is a very basic idea, but it is not basic once it enters the viewer's mind.
I even watch the behind the scenes -- scenes. Unlike most behind the scenes videos, ALS shows every step of their filming. There are many that show the assistant (female) touching the model a little more than needed. It gives more of a look into the model's personality and even shows how much she likes being touched even if not in a porn scene.
I would guess the producer added those behind the scenes videos with extra touching with the plan of one day having a behind the scenes video to turn into a full blown porn scene. If they did not plan that they probably claim they did since it does happen.
There's something different about seeing an assistant ask if she can kiss the model that adds a lot to all of their scenes. It makes me wonder how much of this extracurricular activity goes on in all porn. My thinking is not often. You can see and feel that the ALS models are giving genuine, horny performances. I want to apply for the head baby oil applier! ALS might not even realize the female fantasy they are creating for women viewers. I know I would be a lot more likely to rub baby oil all over a cute, nude woman than jumping right into a lesbian scene.
I am not usually a person that views pictures or downloads them, but one of my very first internet searches for porn -- about 15 years ago, brought up a photo set from ALS Scan. They have some of the most natural and unaltered photos. Their outdoor photosets are life-like. You can download the photosets in zip files.
The videos can be as simple as a woman masturbating on the bed to masturbating by the pool. They use various items including those from gynecology and what I consider extreme dildos, but those are not as common here as on sites labeled as extreme penetration. You will also see some fisting. It does not appeal to me, but like the extreme dildos, it is not that common.
The videos can be downloaded from 270p up to 4K. I tried to get a count on the amount of 4K videos, but received a page that said, "Page not found". The option to see only 4K videos seems to be broken or missing. In my browsing, I have seen 4K labeled videos back as far as 2015. The quality of their videos is very good.
My favorite scenes are the impromptu lesbian scenes, the casting scenes and the ones with the non-participating clothed people visible. I don't like feeling like the only one watching the model.
A month is never enough. I usually join it for 3 months at a time. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I have used. I stream the behind the scenes ones to check for any extra action in them. I would recommend it to anyone looking for fun, believable solo scenes with added bonuses of lesbian and even a few group scenes. I have no comment on the male with female scenes. There are not many of them. I haven't watched any of them. Those seem out of place on this site.
Production values are above average unless you consider story part of the production values.
There are 4K downloads over the last year and 1080p prior to those.
I have not seen a tattoo or a set of implants on the site.
917 scenes, but they haven't updated since January 2019.
Cons:
This type of porn is very dull and plain to me.
The scene titles make you believe there is a story going on, but if there is it is well-hidden.
Now that Adult Time has taken over there is no way to search just for models on 21 Natural. If you go to a model's page it shows you all of her content on all of the Adult Time sites.
Bottom Line:
This site reminds me of Sex Art. The models are very attractive. The settings are nice and fit the modern vibe of the content. That seems to be where they stopped.
Sites like these are hard to review and hard to be too critical of or too enthusiastic about. They do a good job of sticking to their naturals theme, but the scenes lack everything except sex. Maybe they were going for natural equals no stories -- just sex?
I'm not for sure how hard it is to find someone to write a little story with dialogue? The stories seem to be based on that is a man, that is a woman, they are horny, watch them have sex.
The quality of camerawork, lighting and person that opens the window to let natural wind in are all very high and consistent. The closest they come to a story are in the 21 Foot Art scenes.
They have 917 scenes, but their updates seemed to just stop for no reason. Between December 1st, 2018 and the first week of January 2019, they had 16 scenes, then those updates stopped.
You can download in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes of the last year have 4K or 2160p. The streaming video is 720p at least to my monitor that is what it looks like.
They have picture sets for download.
It feels like they are getting everything right except the content. The positions even look the same from scene to scene as is the order of the sexual positions. It is why I felt the foot scenes added to the content. It at least breaks the monotony of following a set order of positions.
For me, between this site, Sex Art and X-Art, I have realized porn is not supposed to be romantic. Scenes like these strengthen the theories about sex being lust. There is little feeling of lust in the scenes. I will try to avoid scenes like these from now on. That is a subjective opinion. If you already know you like this type of porn then you will probably like this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost.
Cons:
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one.
Bottom Line:
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
Your reply is one of the points I was making. I think porn directors are missing out on an entire audience. I know at least a couple of men that enjoy masturbating for women. I know it would be popular with straight women. I think gay men would like it from the voyeuristic side of watching a straight man masturbate for a straight woman. Porn tries so hard to make everything blatantly obvious and I think it is where porn is starting to fail. If it's supposed to be for gay enjoyment no one else is going to enjoy it that much. The same with straight sex. A gay man would need a lot of imagination to watch a man and woman have vaginal intercourse and see himself as the woman but a gay man could fantasize being the woman watching the straight man masturbate. I always thought straight men would have trouble with lesbian porn. There are no penises so what role do they see themselves in? Porn has to figure out that the world and sexuality has changed a lot over the last 10-15 years. Porn hasn't changed a lot.
Maybe I am a little ahead of myself. My reply to LKLK linked to a site named Straight Guys! There are numerous reports coming out about women's use of porn. The percentages are still favoring the men 70% to 30%, however, women spend more time watching porn per day than men do. As money hungry as the porn industry is it seems like they would be trying to get in on the new audience. The sites I have seen for women are like the lovecore sites for men. It could be my own past of being a sexual recluse, but I do not know any woman that fantasizes about having regular sex. I don't like to discuss patients, but I can vaguely make a blanket statement that the regular sex is a big part of marital problems that I hear about. I don't know when it became more normal for women to masturbate for their boyfriend or husband, but I do think there is an obvious connection to porn. Maybe the boyfriend or husband likes watching women masturbate in porn? The wife or girlfriend wants him to be as into her and the woman in the porn.
I look at it that way. If porn makes it more normal for men to masturbate in front of women there would be something new for couples to improve their sex life with. I also think where using gay or even just smaller, thinner men, it does not strike the female's sexual instincts. Some (one on here on PU) high level psychologists believe we have created fantasies that only make us happy inside. That would not trigger as must lust as a fantasy should. Women, in my experience, have way more sexual triggers than men do. It just seems there is a large amount of content just waiting to be made. I do know some men are more aroused by watching their girlfriend or wife watching porn that turns her on more than watching porn aimed at the man. If only I had the money to start such a network! I will check the thread out.
No one really knows how limited the appeal is. The estimations have 30% of porn viewers being women. The two most searched porn sites by women are "Lesbians" and "Gay Porn". There is not a category in porn for "Straight men solo" or "Men masturbating for women". If females made up a smaller group than 30% it would make sense not to try it, but considering there are sites focused on women using enemas, I do not believe that has the market potential of "straight men solo".
Like in the comparison you started with. Is it normal, in real life, for women to go up and masturbate in front of men? There are over 2,000 sites with women masturbating in full scenes on them. Even if the solo men category was based on percentages, that would mean there should be at least 500 solo men sites. I'm not one of the women that hates all porn or thinks the porn industry is unfair. I just believe until someone takes a chance and gives porn aimed at straight women a chance there is an entire market being left untouched. I can't say this for sure, but I believe gay men would also enjoy seeing straight men masturbating.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique site included in a network of CFNM (Clothed Female Nude Male) sites.
This one focuses on women watching men masturbate. The women do not always stay clothed, but by having some of the women taking their clothes off it doubles the chances of seeing something new from scene to scene.
When I think of "porn for women" this site is what I think of.
Unlike other sites of this type and in the CFNM genre, there is very little belittling of the men which is much more realistic to me. I do not know many women that would make fun of a man's size if he was masturbating over her body.
The included network access has 5 more sites in it and a total of 1,300 scenes. This site has 226 scenes.
There are downloadable photos and screencaps to go along with the videos.
Finishing the pros with it is one of the few sites I know of with believable straight solo men for women's enjoyment.
Cons:
It is a narrow niche. I am not for sure if straight men would enjoy it since it is a man masturbating. I am not for sure if gay men would enjoy since there are women in the scenes.
The network's navigation can impede the individual sites. Clicking videos on Lady Voyeurs takes you to all the videos on the whole network. It can be worked around, but even knowing it, I still make the mistake.
Bottom Line:
Along with a couple of my female friends I have looked for sites with men masturbating. There are some in the gay genre. Some of those are good. Some of those are clearly not directed at women. This is a niche the female produced sites are not interested in filming. I view porn as a precursor to fantasy. If I see it in a video, the next fantasy entering my mind will be whatever was in the video.
I do not know the percentage of guys willing to masturbate in front of woman in real life (not on a webcam or on Facetime), but I want to say it is low. So much hardcore porn has the guy pulling out and masturbating for 20 seconds to cum. Why not have scenes where men see a woman and can't stop themselves from masturbating right in front of her? In the right hands (it was kind of intended), this niche could be the one that breaks porn's hold on porn for "man's enjoyment" and gives women something to fantasize about and enjoy.
As porn currently is, us females get to choose between watching the same hardcore porn intended for male's enjoyment, two cute college girls doing what we are sure did not really happen when we were in college or porn intended for gay men to enjoy.
Lady Voyeurs helps change that, but it could be better.
The women are believably into the guy masturbating for them. More direction in the scenes would help. Some of the guys stand in one spot and go to-fro-to-fro-to-fro while the woman is in the background watching and teasing him. I want to believe if a guy was brave enough to pull it out from limp to hard, he would be brave enough to at least face the sexy, teasing woman. Is it just my own fetish to say the scenes would be better if the guy inexplicably tried to get cum on the woman? I would think that would strengthen this site for straight men. I believe most men would like seeing a guy land a facial -- 3 feet away -- on a snobby, teasing woman.
It is a regular feeling I have when watching porn. There is so much more they could do. My score shows I do like this site a lot. I just wonder how much of it is because there are not many sites with this niche?
The minimal demeaning and belittlement also scores points for this site. They have a newer scene with the belittling. I do not know why. They have a another site on the network called, "Hey, Little Dick" shouldn't the scene titled, "It's so small" be on that site? Porn is in a quandary. We do not have to abuse and hate men to make porn for women. If a man was brave enough to masturbate in front of woman, and her response was "It's so small" does that not continue to lower the image of women? Tasteless is the word.
Stick with the pretty models being turned on by the brave to-fro-to-fro-to-fro man. Teasing him and even telling him what she wants him to do besides to-fro.
I would not rate the network any higher than this site. One of the other sites was named earlier, "Hey, Little Dick", another is "Girls Abuse Guys", the big site on the network "Pure CFNM" is good, but the themes are inconsistent, the site "CFNM Games" is on the network too and it goes between eye-rolling bad scenes to good scenes. Really, "Hey guy, lay down with your boner pointing up, we are going to compete by throwing hoops at your boner!" The poor guy must not have had sex in years to be talked into that.
I think it is important to point out these dumb/bad/belittling scenes because it is where you see the female models inability to act. A few look like they enjoy tormenting the guy, but most look uncomfortable or like they are auditioning for a B-grade horror movie.
That is why Lady Voyeurs scores an 88 and it would be my score for the network. The Lady Voyeurs scenes with the woman watching, being turned on, taking her clothes off, masturbating too are very believable and rely on zero acting ability. Could it be called "Instinctual Porn"?
The video quality is good, you can download 480p, 720p and 1080p. I do not like their streaming player. It crashes my browser 1 out of 3 times I try to use it. I usually will skim-stream a scene to see if it is worth a download. The amount of models on the network is around 600. They have a variety of size, race and attitudes in both male and female models.
It is a good value if you are looking for this type of content. There is not a lot of it out there.
I am glad you found my review helpful. I tried to focus on the parts I believe Nubiles.net does better at than the Nubiles Porn network. Most reviews I see of Nubiles are more focused on the network.
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site is in its 16th year of operation. There are 2,213 models. One is as cute as the next.
Innocence lost before your eyes. My favorite part of this site are the shy and sweet models.
Minimal tattoos, implants or other body modifications.
Non-extreme masturbation.
Video quality is superb, but I wish the photo sets were more vivid in colors.
I have been an on-again, off-again member for 10 years. I like that they have not made any drastic changes.
Cons:
It would not hurt to have more body types. Just because they are barely legal teens does not mean they have to all be slim.
More outdoor sets would be a welcome change.
Maybe have some of the willing models to go more extreme with their masturbation
Bottom Line:
Nubiles.net was the first porn site I joined. I sign up for 3 months each year. This is my 10th year.
It first captured my attention with its name. A former employer was said to hire only "nubile employees". As a former sex recluse the innocence of the models, their shyness and the non-extreme masturbation kept me around as a member.
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman or relationship with a woman, but I would consider it with some of the models on Nubiles. It is non-intimidating pornography. I would not group it with sites like Met-Art, but it is closer to Met-Art than a hardcore site.
My only disappointment with the site is the inclusion of hardcore content. The hardcore scenes are not like hardcore porn we usually see, but why even risk losing your established niche?
I think with the site now operating as part of the Nubiles Porn network they should only have solo scenes on Nubiles.net.
The site updates as much as entire networks. There are 2 photo set updates per day and 2 videos per day. If you catch a sale price you can have access to the whole network for around $10-$15.
The models are almost all slender. I would like to see chubby, shy, innocent models too. I have noticed sites like to create an image of what fits a type of model. They do get stuck on trying to stay within the image.
The video quality only needs work if you require 4K. I consider their videos some of the crispest and highest quality available. My complaint about the picture colors is splitting hairs. I prefer warm colors in photos. I am sure others prefer cooler colors like Nubiles uses. Most do not know the difference!
The site offers more than 13,000 video or photo sets. The videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. The photos can be downloaded in zip files.
The models range from amateurs you will not see anywhere else to early-career pros. There is a focus on natural. Tattoos have become more common in recent years, but are not required like some sites. Implants are not common; neither is too much make-up or formal clothing.
I believe it is one of the best values in pay porn. You also receive access to Nubiles Porn. A network including various niches. I would join Nubiles.net with or without the network access.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
