| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
127
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My de facto favorite site by Met Art.
They have 1,227 models and they are of different looks, ages and builds.
There are 1,264 videos and 2,813 photo sets.
Thankfully, the archive of content is bigger here than most of their sites, they are only updating The Life Erotic every 4-5 days.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded and I can confirm as much as possible there’s no download limit. I have about 80% of the content from the site.
Something you do not see as much on the Met Art sites is rubber/latex clothing, it adds an edgy feel to what can seem like a clinical group of sites.
174 of the scenes are lesbian including some group. The rest are solo. |
| Cons: |
It doesn’t feel like a con in 2021 since so many sites are no longer even updating, but I wish they could speed the updates up a little. As it is, you can expect 7-8 updates per month.
They don’t have as many lesbian scenes these days. I don’t know if that’s a byproduct of Covid or not, but it’s also not a deathblow con. |
| Bottom Line: |
In my recent trip through the world of Met Art, I have realized a lot of sites are happy (meaning the majority of their customers are too) with sticking with a tried and tested formula. The Life Erotic is Met Art’s Henry David Thoreau’s man who who marches to the drum he hears no matter how far away. It’s still mostly just women masturbating or the 174 lesbian scenes, but the mold is broken here. It’s not a criticism of Met Art or their sites. The models are gorgeous, young, very fit, some even look a little skinny and that’s coming from someone who was under 100 pounds last year. The Life Erotic’s newest update even shows a perfect example of what I mean. It’s the former superstar European model Blue Angel. My first memberships to porn sites included 21 Sextury which had a solo Blue Angel site on it, she was a young, slender model back then. She’s now in her 30s, has filled out more and no longer looks like the innocent flower waiting to be crushed by the porn industry.
One thing I normally would not talk about as a positive or negative on a porn site are the descriptions of the scenes, but the descriptions on The Life Erotic tell some perteinent information like this new Blue Angel scene is produced by another former superstar European model Sandra Shine, who I know also produces some on at least one other site. It makes every scene, especially the newer ones, worth looking at, reading the descriptions of and surprisingly adds a lot to the content. I do believe this is the most explicit of the Met Art sites unless you count ALS Scan and I think they are about equal.
The site is large with a combined 4,000 plus videos and photo sets. All can be downloaded in high quality and there are no limits. You also will get the broader range of model types on this site. I believe the update schedule is somewhere in the middle ground since it’s hard to to complain about a site updating every 4 days when most sites are not currently updating at all, but most of the Met Art sites are updating daily. If the update schedule was better the score would be a little higher, there’s not much room to go up.
They do score extra points for being more creative than any of the other Met Art sites except maybe Sex Art which may be too creative at times. The masturbation on The Life Erotic is more “erotic” to me. It could be the models are a little older than the other Met Art sites, it could be their outfits which sometimes include crotchless bodysuits and masks. This is not going to be meant how it sounds. There’s more meat on the bones here and that has nothing to do with the models’ builds. There’s more to the content. This is easily one of my favorite sites.
It’s so high on my sites I was planning on just joining it and ALS Scan which I like almost as much as The Life Erotic, but there was a special offer for the entire Met Art network and I took it. I’m not surprised The Life Erotic and ALS Scan are still my favorite two sites on that network.
The videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p all are mp4 files and they also offer a WMV and DivX download. I know what WMV is, but really don’t know what the DivX is or why it’s offered. The photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes. The biggest sizes are over 4000x2600.
It’s very close to a perfect site for me and I think it earns a “seriously underrated” mention. The only thing I would change besides speeding up the updates is I would maybe push the envelope a little more with some light bondage. They have the outfits on for it. |
|
04-06-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
ALS Scan
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, slim, pretty models doing all sorts of things to themselves.
464 models on the site and these are mostly pro if not all pro models. I don’t know a lot of models by name, but recognize most of these.
There are an incredible 3,250 videos and 3,494 photo sets.
They are averaging an update per day, these do alternate between photo set update one day, video the next and they are not of the same model.
The videos and photo sets are downloadable and I have not seen anything about limits.
The quality of the videos and photos is very good. |
| Cons: |
These young women look more like I do and there does not seem to be a break in slim, small boobs, small butts, they are also all shaved.
It is an older site and you can see a difference in the performance quality by the models. It is not a big difference, but if you watch an older scene it seems better than the newer scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I strayed too far from my comfort zone last month. While I do not consider myself a lesbian or bicurious even; I do enjoy watching women masturbate. I believe it is a deep fantasy in my head they can see me too. The scenes on here change a lot if you scan through the years. Most of the newer scenes are fingering, small the average size dildo, standard vibrator or the wand-type vibrator. The older scenes are more explicit and you see more fisting, larger dildos and the models -- in my opinion -- pushing themselves to their limits. It is not really a complaint. It is just a difference I notice.
The women are mostly all attractive, cute ones, some are very pretty, some are gorgeous. Can I imagine this is what I looked like nearly 20 years ago? There are some lesbian scenes and I wish there were more. The lesbian scenes on here are very good. I did as other reviewers mentioned and checked out the island vacation videos. I would pay for a site with just those type of scenes on it. Those are excellent.
This site is a technological wonder in its quality. The photos I have downloaded have all been at a minimum of 4000 plus x 2500 plus, with some being even bigger. The picture quality is good enough to impress me and I am not usually into pictures. The models make the picture sets good. They seem to all be into teasing and being playful, then turning to a dirtier, naughtier side later in the sets. One of my all-time favorite sites -- Nubiles, could take a few lessons in photographing young women from this site.
The videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p and separate WMV and DIVX/AVI versions too. I believe the photo sets are consistently better than the videos. The videos are much better than the softcore sites I am used to, but I am thinking this -- young, slim, small boobs, small butt, all shaved, combined with just solo masturbation makes the videos seem similar. They do have some solo videos where they do more with the way the scenes play out, but it was -- again, in my opinion, better in the older scenes. I have the same complaints with the other top softcore sites too.
The site is huge. There is no way I could go through all this content in a month. Combining photo sets with videos puts the total number at over 6,700. This is one of those sites I would not complain about if they were not updating.
The Behind the Scenes videos helps that video number out, but this goes back to the photo sets being as good as the videos. The Behind the Scenes videos are as good as the regular videos. You can tell this site cares about their quality and the models enjoying themselves. It shows even more in those Behind the Scenes videos.
This site really impresses me, but I would like to see more lesbian scenes and more of those vacation scenes. Something else I really liked about it is most of the models have a lot of scenes/photo sets. I believe that shows best by looking at the total number of models at 464 with 3,200 videos and 3,400 photo sets. Some of the models have more than 10 videos and 10 photo sets on here. It is interesting to me to watch how the models change from scene to scene. I do not think they film all the scenes of each model on the same day or in a week even. It looks more like they bring models back months, even years later and you can see how much the model has progressed in her confidence. One of my favorite sites. I will have to watch for a year special on this one. |
|
04-06-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Sex Art
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day. |
| Cons: |
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene. |
|
04-06-21 02:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. |
| Cons: |
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. |
| Bottom Line: |
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. |
|
04-06-21 02:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
131
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
I picked, "yes, but only 2nd and 3rd prize". That is the way the raffle used to be and I don't remember any problems coming from it. I do remember when the raffle changed to a winner couldn't win the following week and that led to weeks where there weren't even enough eligible reviewers to win. I believe with the format being monthly now it would be taking a huge risk to say all 3 winners one month would be ineligible the next month.
|
03-10-21 01:51am
|
Review
133
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
134
|
She's Brand New
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty. |
|
03-10-21 01:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Girls Out West
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Australian porn with I think all amateurs.
1,051 models and they vary in looks, body size, shape, hairy, shaven, very unique site in that regard.
At the time of the review, 4/29, 2020, they have 4,358 scenes and 2,692 photo sets.
Easy sign-up and cancel with Epoch.
Six new videos per week and 1 new photo set per week.
Deep advanced search that gives you over 100 tags/actions to filter.
Blend of solo, lesbian and boy/girl scenes.
Behind the scenes videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
As appealing as their blend of models are, I also would think at least some of those models would be unappealing to some. Especially those against hairy.
Boy/girl section is much smaller than lesbian or solo with only 252 boy/girl scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I figured I went outside my comfort zone for long enough. I enjoy these sites with amateurs, models with imperfections, models that probably would not be called models by some people. One of the first things I noticed is the scenes have a fun feeling to them. I do not get the feeling these models are under immense pressure like you see on some sites. I also do not feel like many of these young women are very shy, either.
I think the pros give a good overview of how much content this site has, and I didn’t know any of the models by name. Is it a pro or con that you’re probably going to need to stay on as a member for more than a month? It gives me the feeling it would be a good site to join for a year even. They have over a decade of consistent updating.
Before I go much further into the bottom line, I do want to go back to that first con. As a female, I don’t think I’m as critical of models looks as most guys are, but even saying that I would say there are 15-20% of these models that I didn’t find attractive. The other side of that is you’re going to find models that are very attractive, and you’ve never heard of them.
Most of the content here is what I would call female-friendly. It’s not softcore solo or lesbian. These are real women masturbating and as we all know when us non-porn stars masturbate; we are going for the fastest orgasm. It does lend itself to more expressive, more vocal, would sloppy be a negative word to use? I don’t mean it as such. I just mean this isn’t the masturbation you’re used to seeing on a major site. The lesbian scenes go from looking like real lesbians having sex with each other to the more playful lesbian scenes where the women look inexperienced.
You’re going to get random settings which I enjoy in porn. The solo scenes might be on an exam table, in a garage, on the bed, on the floor, in a cubicle, dinner table, outdoors and everywhere I think sex is possible.
The video quality is very good. They have 4K going back to 2017 and unless I missed something, all video scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p. This includes remastering some of their “classic” scenes.
The boy/girl scenes are more inconsistent. It seems like some of the couples are possibly real couples, while others aren’t quite as interested in each other.
As a whole, this site does it a lot right. There are amateurs that are doing a good job of looking like pros. Some excellent solo videos and they explore a lot of fetishes from peeing to squirting to possibly the biggest collection of hairy models (body hair). I will have to join it again in the future. That could be its biggest con. It’s a lot of content to take in over one month. |
|
04-29-20 01:16am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I used to not download anything so I picked $25. I would still join a site for $25 without downloads. I just don't like it when a site doesn't tell you there are no downloads until you get inside the member area.
|
04-28-20 09:13pm
|
Reply
137
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Review
138
|
Club Bang Boys
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network of 5 gay sites that has some appeal for women.
Currently has 696 scenes and averages 2 updates per week.
Videos and photos are downloadable with no limits.
Navigation is handled through tags.
Group scenes which I think are better than the one on one, but not better than the solo.
Includes access to a large streaming network. |
| Cons: |
Still not enough solo scenes, not in relative comparison to the total number of scenes.
Sites seem to change focus. Gay Public Hardcore has most of the solo scenes on it, but the scenes leading up to the solo scenes are two guys in public. The solo scenes are not that public.
No model list, I have noticed most guys that are in solo scenes have other solo scenes on gay sites. There are also no model names on the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw several solo videos from this network while streaming videos. I probably should have checked further into how many solo scenes they have as the number is under 30, but they are good. The guys for the most part are handsome and fit except for the strange masked man who appears in numerous scenes. I do think the masked man kind of fits the whole feel here since there is no model list and there are no model names on any of the scenes. The one guy you know is the masked man.
The five sites are: Gay Public Hardcore, All Barebacked, Bareback Boy Bangers, Boys Club for Men and Gay Bang Boy.
This is maybe the 5th or 6th site I have joined that are considered “gay” sites, but it the first I have seen with orgies. The site Gay Bang Boy has scenes with as many as 10 or more men in each scene. This has its pluses, since I like to see men masturbating, the ones not directly involved in the sex are usually standing around masturbating. Some are guys just masturbating together. The only problem with these scenes is there are masked men. The masked man referred to earlier wears a black mask that covers his face. The masked men in these orgy scenes are more like Halloween masks. It is just a little strange.
They have 696 scenes with 2 updates per week. The videos can be downloaded in 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are more like screen captures and can be downloaded too.
Besides the orgies surprising me, a lot of these orgies have men that look 18-21 and some that look over 50. It kind of reminds me of Party Hardcore except they’re in a house with no women. The camera does get lost at times and tries to show too many of the men at one time. It is still is new to me see all-male orgies.
The other sites, Bareback Boy Banging, has some group (5 or less), threesomes and some male/male. It seems like adding more than just two guys makes these scenes more arousing to me – a female.
The site, All Barebacked, is small and hasn’t updated in 2 years, male/male scenes with one threesome. These scenes are a little on the rougher side.
The last, Boys Club for Men, is a blend of young/old and group, a few of these scenes are very good, the five guys in a spa scene is one of the better gay scenes I have watched.
All in all, it’s one of the better “gay” sites I have joined that also at least caters somewhat to women. |
|
04-28-20 09:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
139
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
140
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
141
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm naive?
What do you call the models that based on what you've said here chose to do a scene with a man known to abuse women in the scenes? Surely they would know it. And what do you call a man of your age that believes slapping and choking is some kind of terrible form of abuse? There are women that love being slapped and choked during sex.
What I can do is put you in contact with the agency I work for. We have entire days we work with abused women. I've been doing it for 10+ years. I've seen women with 2 inch deep rope burn scars around their necks that can't talk. Women with their skin melted by battery acid. Women with their legs broken behind their heads. I don't know what it is about this site that makes everyone a know-it-all. Maybe I am being naive about why you reply since that gets you more tickets in the raffle? Stick to the political nonsense. You know nothing about abused women.
|
04-26-20 07:46am
|
Review
142
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female. |
| Cons: |
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me. |
|
04-26-20 02:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
143
|
James Deen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc... |
| Cons: |
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better. |
|
04-25-20 09:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
144
|
Catalina Cruz
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first try at an interactive porn site, I like it, but there are some downfalls.
I don't have a very good knowledge of Catalina, but she is still doing live cam shows on this site and that's something I really hadn't experienced.
I wouldn't want to guess at her age, but she is an older model, she is still very attractive and is very good on the cam shows.
Includes hundreds of her videos as well, but streaming only.
33 other sites are included each of a different model and these also have many videos and photo sets to view/stream with no downloads.
Accidentally clicked pay by Paypal and it said my card was declined, I didn't input a card or make it to the Paypal screen. It redirected me to Epoch which wasn't the original biller.
Subjective as it is, she has one of the prettiest pussies I have seen. |
| Cons: |
There's no downloads anywhere. None of the bonus sites have them. You can't download photos either.
The site is cluttered. It has 8 ads in the right margin and there's a section for Catalina's content plus all 33 included sites are shown too. Maybe the most cluttered screen I've seen.
Have to sign in on each of the 33 bonus sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still trying different types of sites and saw this advertised as an interactive site since you can email Catalina, you get access to her Snapchat, which I didn't have and she does live cam shows where she sometimes masturbates, sometimes she is more teasing in them.
I'm giving the site a higher score than I probably would most sites without downloads. It introduced me to the live cam show and I have a membership to Cherry Pimps, where they have live cam shows too and you can download them. I just usually miss the Cherry Pimps ones.
As someone that is sure I'm not a lesbian, I found the oddest attraction to Catalina's pussy. She just looks pretty, fake boobs notwithstanding and she seems like a genuine person.
The content is the normal or common kind. Cam shows are fully nude, some are a little more showy and sexual than others. I would imagine a person's mood would change from day to date. The videos are like any porn you can get from any site. There's nothing that stands out about it.
I would like to see more cam shows, the next one is 2/29, the following one after that is 3/8. They do keep an archive of previous cam shows too.
I do think the amount of content helps it a lot except in the cluttered department. Catalina has around 700 videos in her archive and you get another 33 sites.
I don't have as much of a problem with the no downloads part as some do. Most of this content wouldn't be content I would download. I just stream a scene or two at a time and I don't know if that's a negative or positive. It doesn't make me think I wish I could download this and watch it some more.
Of the other 33 sites, I found several I liked including Sienna West, Brooke Banner and the site Licensed to Blow.
Even though the site is cluttered it is easy to navigate since they stuffed everything onto one page. I don't know how big of a deal that is about having her Snapchat. I avoid anything social media-looking as my job has policies against social media.
I did notice the newer webcam shows and videos are 4K, some are Virtual Reality, so it does look like they spend a lot of time and I assume money on making these shows top-notch.
It's a pleasant change for me. She's friendly and talks to those watching her webcam shows. She seems to really enjoy showing her body and she looks like she's having fun. Maybe that's something I have missed in a lot of porn I've watched? The live shows give you more of a feeling that she wants to be there and took time out of her day to get naked for the viewers.
I think if you're a downloader you won't be happy with this site. If you can see it as something you don't see everyday in porn, and just enjoy it in the moment with streaming, it's a good site to join. The Porn Users price also made the no downloads a lot easier to swallow. |
|
02-25-20 01:59am
Replies (1)
|
Review
145
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month. |
| Cons: |
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views. |
|
02-17-20 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
European models being coerced (probably not) into going back to an apartment to have sex.
Started out as Reality Kings initial step into the world of European porn.
Gorgeous, AAA European models with many major Euro stars.
Site has 812 scenes on it.
Streaming player works well with little to no buffering.
If taking the download upgrade the videos are mostly 720p or 1080p (HD) |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating on December 27, 2018
Downloads cost extra ($14.95 per month)
Not as much story or talking as other RK scenes since some of the models don’t speak English. |
| Bottom Line: |
My initial interest in porn was on European models. Sites like Nubiles, Sapphic Erotica, Club Seventeen were really all I joined for several years. I had always wanted to join this site to see the usually softcore European models in reality themed, hardcore sex.
The site’s older scenes stand out as there are more known stars and the scenes had more of a story or at least dialogue. Some of the scenes are lacking so much in story, the model just walks in the apartment, sits down, takes her clothes off and the sex or masturbation starts. Some start in a car where they (Reality Kings) are driving the model to the apartment and you do get some car action from flashing to blowjobs.
The site stopped updating at the end of 2018, but it had a nice run with 812 scenes and is one of those sites if you like the content you might download 200-300 of the scenes. There’s not as much playfulness in these scenes as the other Reality King scenes but depending on the viewer that could be a positive or a negative. The sex in these scenes is average to above average in quality. I do think these are the prettiest and closest to natural models on Reality Kings.
If you choose to upgrade to the download package there are plenty of HD videos 1080p and 720p to download, but no 4K. The photo sets are also worth downloading if you’re into photos as this content is 100% exclusive and can’t be found anywhere else. If you don’t choose to upgrade to downloads you can still use their very good streaming player.
One thing I have noticed is the scenes are not quite as hardcore as the hardcore scenes on Reality King’s other sites. A lot of these European stars were not known for male/female scenes. There are also some girl/girl scenes and solo as well. It's a good site if you ever wondered how your favorite European models would do in hardcore scenes. So far, it has been my favorite site on the Reality Kings network. |
|
01-27-20 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
149
|
Dyked
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the better lesbian sites I have joined.
Very good production values and the scenes have an added touch of creativity to them.
Only 74 scenes, but I have downloaded nearly all 74.
Varied scenarios unlike a lot of lesbian sites that stick with a soft background, in the bed.
All videos have 1080p option.
Included photo sets and screencaps. All videos, screencaps and videos are downloadable.
Billing through Epoch or Paypal with Epoch. I had a slight problem with Paypal with Epoch and will explain below. |
| Cons: |
The scenes could be longer, have more story, they have a good lesbian site here and they should keep trying to improve it. It could be one of the very best if they did.
I had a major problem with the billing and it's why I've had the account for 3 months. I don't think it's the site's fault.
How many pretty and cute girls getting naked can you watch before it gets boring? |
| Bottom Line: |
The billing problem, in my opinion, was either Paypal or Epoch's fault. When I signed up for the site through Paypal, I received an email confirming it. I didn't read over it. When it came time to cancel, I went back to welcome email and there's no information in it. No login info, no member ID, and no way to cancel it on Epoch. I sent Epoch an email and they said it was a common problem. The billing is being listed as charged to Epoch Customer Service instead of to the porn site. They were able to find my information based on the Paypal transaction ID. I won't be using Paypal to pay for porn again until that gets fixed.
This site was promoted to me as a Team Skeet Premium site. I have really enjoyed their premium sites and it was a big reason I joined it. Instead, as soon as I joined it said I had access to all of Team Skeet. I'm not including any of that in my review as I believe Dyked is an excellent lesbian site.
Most lesbian sites I have joined are very soft, very lovey, even soft. Dyked takes a different approach. There are scenes with two dominatrix females whipping the teen lesbians into having lesbian sex. There are gym scenes. The almost overdone video game geek girl lesbian scenes. There are scenes with more than 2 girls, hardcore strapon scenes that are rough and a little bit of everything. There's rarely of feeling of love or passion, but there's a feeling of very high lust.
The models are all attractive. They only have 74 scenes, and the update schedule doesn't give me much hope for long term growth. They have 3 updates some months, 0 updates some months and 2 in other months.
The video quality is very good with 1080p, 720p and 576p, 480p and 360p available. The photo sets and screen captures are downloadable and some of those are even better than the videos.
There's a good blend of playful, silly, rough, lots of tribbing/scissoring, and unless you get tired of watching pretty girls naked there's not much to complain about. Believe it or not, as a non-lesbian, I do sometimes get tired of watching pretty girls naked!
The scenes are generally fun and light-hearted, there are stepfamily scenes mixed in too. I would recommend it by itself as a site for those into lesbian scenes that don't follow the typical formula of lesbian scenes so it's a definite recommend with the added Team Skeet network. |
|
01-13-20 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
150
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An exceptionally large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a bigger than most sites’ collection of videos too.
10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, all are downloadable.
A site with 3800 attractive European teen models
Multiple updates every day
Comes with over 14,000 bonus streaming only videos as well as a cam site.
More explicit than many other similar sites with mostly masturbation or solo. There are some hardcore sex and some girl/girl scenes too.
Bills with Epoch, a trusted company |
| Cons: |
It had a pre-checked cross sale on sign-up and I nearly missed it.
Annoying advertising in the members area |
| Bottom Line: |
This has to be the best site of this type that I have ever joined. I would even move it just a little ahead of my previous all-time favorite, Nubiles. Not only is there more content than I could watch in even a few months, but the models are attractive and some are to me top-level in looks. On the whole, these might be the prettiest models I've ever seen on a site or network.
There are four types of scenes here. You get solo, masturbation, lesbian and boy/girl. The exceptionally good camerawork adds a lot to these scenes.
About three quarters of the scenes and photo sets are of sexy young women alone, either posing nude or masturbating. Even the guys are nice looking. Few if any are much bigger than average in dick size and they make believable couples with the young and natural looking female models. My favorite part of the site is that most of the models come across as shy and sweet. They seem genuinely turned on by their partners, both male and female. They are so young too!
I do not consider myself a lesbian. I have never had a sexual experience with a woman, but I would consider it with some of these models. They were just that cute and irresistible. None of the scenes were at all extreme and seemed believable, unlike so many porn scenes on other sites.
You will find 10,700 photo sets and 7200 videos, All are downloadable and there are new updates every day. I could not ask for more.
There were some nice bonus streaming scenes as an extra, 14,000 of them as well as a cam site with 8000 models and a DVD site. I thought I only got this site and was happy I got these other extras when I signed up. I think this type of porn could easily be advertised as female-friendly. |
|
01-06-20 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
|
