| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content – solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesn’t work at all for me – lots of fits and starts
Despite the site’s name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. It’s not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in – a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule – there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so it’s kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model’s name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the “pros” section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets I’ve ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I haven’t used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I won’t be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
52
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
6 updates per week – 3 videos and 3 photo sets
Very high quality production values
1,017 Models, 23 Artists, 2.882 Photo Sets, 1,598 Films – there is A LOT of content
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
The Behind the Scenes videos give you a good chance to get to know the models better.
PU price of $19.99 is quite reasonable. Annual memberships are $100, and lifetime memberships are available if you already belong to some other Met Art site.
Speeds of browsing, downloading, etc. are quite good. Navigation mirrors that on Met Art, which is excellent. |
| Cons: |
For me, sometimes all the artistry gets in the way. I like simpler stories and less makeup. Although the makeup is rarely garish, it’s not the more natural look that I prefer.
Many of the photo sets are simply pictures taken from the video session, as opposed to separately conceived sessions. They are not screen caps however.
The Behind the Scenes videos tend to be quite short – less than 10 minutes
Except for the Behind the Scenes videos, there is very little model information |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas was originally founded by its namesake, but Mr. Thomas has since retired in 2014. He does make occasional cameo appearances in some recent videos, but is not the director for any new material that I have seen.
Unlike some sites where the primary content is the photographs while the videos are an add-on, here the focus is on the videos. The photo shoots are frequently (but not always) just photos of the video session. But they are still high quality photos in their own right.
The video collection includes almost everything that was posted to the site since 2009, with a small collection of earlier stuff, some dating back to 1999. So if you’re looking for stuff prior to 2009, it will be pretty hit or miss. Older videos are available in 360p. Starting around 2010 the stuff starts to become available in 720p. From 2012 on there is 1080p. Newer stuff is available in 4K, although I am not equipped to take advantage of that myself, so can’t comment on how good that is.
The site is mostly lesbian content, with some solo, and occasional boy-girl content up until about 2013. After 2013 it seems to be all female, which is fine by me.
Production values, in terms of clarity, lighting, sound quality, are all state of the art for the time they were filmed. The people behind the cameras here know what they are doing.
I tend to find the story lines to be not that interesting. The love making however, that does hold my attention.
The women are supremely sexy, with many of your favorites from Met Art or Sex Art also appearing here. For some, like Tracy Lindsay (who is amazing), this is her main site, with less frequent appearances elsewhere in the MA network.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The bottom line is this is an excellent site, and if you are interested in girl-girl photos and videos, you definitely want to consider this site. |
|
07-03-17 09:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Vixen.com
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very high quality videos and photos
Most videos have an actual story
The videos can be lengthy – some times an hour long
Most videos available in 4K
540+ videos, each video has an accompanying photo gallery
310+ female performers
The PU Discount Price of $12.95 for a month |
| Cons: |
The files are very large – 2 to 3 GB for 720p video
Downloads are limited to 25 per week
One update per week
Vixen stand-alone site is just boy-girl, with varying numbers of boys and girls in a video. |
| Bottom Line: |
The glamour is turned up to Eleventy on this site. It reminds me of the 80’s TV Series Dynasty. Locales, scenery, lighting, makeup, dresses, even the stunt cocks are all dressed to the nines at the start of the episode.
The main reason I joined was because Kelly Collins has some Boy-Girl scenes here, which as far as I know Vixen is the only network that has that with her. Everything else I’ve seen with Kelly Collins is either solo or lesbian. That hardcore content did not disappoint.
Each video has a significant story, and some of the stories stretch across several episodes, and even across some of the sister sites. If a story does have multiple episodes, they do not come out together, one per week, but are usually spread out at least a month apart between episodes.
The sister sites in the network are: Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw, Deeper, Slayed, Milfy and Wifey. You can join them individually, which is how I would probably proceed, or you can sign up for the whole network, Vixen+. The PU price is $59.95 per month for the network. One thing I’m not sure about – if you sign up for Vixen+, is the download limit 25 files PER SITE per week, or is it 25 per month for the whole network. I only joined Vixen so haven’t tried downloading from multiple sites in the same month.
Even with a download limit of 25 per week, you can download 100 episodes in the course of a 30 day membership, which is almost 20% of the entire site, so they are not holding back all that much from you. And if you like it that much, the price is reasonable enough to sign up again for a second month.
The site is easy to cancel, but be sure to save the email they sent you when you signed up – it’s much easier to cancel if you have that info handy. |
|
05-25-25 01:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Wow Girls
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Depending on how you join, Includes full access to 4 sites – WowGirls, WowPorn, AllFineGirls, and UltraFilms (some join links might only get you 2 or 3 sites)
Very reasonable pricing – PU discount is $17.95 for a month, or $69.95 for a year – and I definitely recommend a yearly one
Many videos in 4K, 6K or even 8k, and either 30 fps or 60 fps.
Some of the top models have A LOT of content.
They take their time, including lots of foreplay
Some girls have an incredible amount of content |
| Cons: |
You can’t set your own password
Unsurprisingly, the super high resolution and refresh rate on some files makes them BIG. |
| Bottom Line: |
Putting “Wow” in the name of the site makes a lot of sense – I’ve been saying Wow a lot when looking at a photo set or video I haven’t seen before.
Most shoots (but not all) involve both a photo gallery and a video. The photo gallery will come first, and the video can be a day or two later or sometimes weeks later. Usually the two sets will have the same name, but not always.
For all practical purposes, WowPorn, AllFineGirls and WowGirls are now basically the same site. You can log into each of them with the same user ID and password, but when I browse them, I can’t see any difference among the three. Videos and Photos are still stamped with only one of these site names, but the layout of the 3 sites is basically now identical.
Ultra Films requires a different password from the other site, and it does have a different layout. The thumbnails are bigger, and the site just feels newer. But among the 4 sites, I can’t really detect anything to differentiate them in terms of content. WowGirls updates daily, and Ultra Films averages about 3 updates per week.
All 4 sites have a mixture of scenes: some solo softcore, some solo masturbation, some lesbian, some boy-girl. A few have multiple girls in them. Many of the scenes are also quite lengthy, sometimes pushing an hour in length.
WowGirls, WowPorn and AllFineGirls Combined: 3,200+ Videos, 4,100+ Photo Galleries, 500+ Models
UltraFilms: 690+ Videos, 1600+ Photo Sets, 200+ Models
If you combine the appearances of some models among all 4 sites, some of them appear incredibly often. Nancy A has over 400 appearances, Anjelica over 300, Gina Gerson over 200, Nancey 199, Paula Shy over 150, Hayli Sanders and Sybil 150 each, Mila Azul over 140, Leona Mia over 130, etc. That suggests to me either they pay incredibly well, or else they just have the knack of keeping a girl happy enough to keep coming back for more.
There are also 3 newer sister sites, Angels.love, Nancy.love, and Sensual.love. If you are a member of Wowgirls then the sign-up to each of these is $9.95 for a month. I haven’t partaken yet but they look very interesting. For Angels.love, all the scenes feature at least 2 girls plus a guy. For Nancy.love, every scene includes Nancy A, and supposedly none of that content appears in the main four sites. And Sensual.love is lesbian. |
|
05-22-25 07:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
55
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Nice review. I've definitely thought about this site a few times, but the $49 price for a month is pretty high. Any discounts out there that you know of?
|
05-23-25 07:47am
|
|
