| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
51
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
|
12-08-16 04:14am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
52
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for the update. I'm going to pass on the site. I have no patience for such shenanigans.
|
02-14-17 06:57am
|
Reply
53
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I was going to join and then you posted about canceling problems, bummer. If you don't mind, can you let us know what happens? I'd like to join but not if canceling is a hassle.
|
02-12-17 04:21am
|
Reply
54
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I enjoyed the review - very informative. I had no idea about the laws and customs in India regarding sex & porn. However, I did wonder why there was so little porn available shot in India.
Another negative for the site - they state you can preview videos, but when you click the play symbol, it simply takes you to the sign up page. But for 5 bucks, I suppose I'll join to get the 18 videos.
|
02-11-17 01:08pm
|
Review
55
|
Cum Louder
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
None. It pains me to give them even 50. Okay, it could've been worse and it didn't cost $30. |
| Cons: |
* Download speed
* Site layout is nonsensical, navigability
* No support
* Language display changed constantly from English to Spanish even though I clicked English as my preference
* Quality of wimmin |
| Bottom Line: |
I can't figure out what's what here. There are cams and photos and supposedly other sites, but I couldn't find any other sites and had no interest in the cams or photos.
Unless the other review has another URL, the navigability is the worst I encountered anywhere. The download speed is a deal breaker. I emailed for help over a day ago and no response. Ok, I may be hasty, but I'm done with this site after 2 days and I ain't cummin' back. I find it unbearable.
I spent a good amount of time trying to figure out the site. I thought that I had to be missing something after reading stinger's review. I came to the conclusion that either he had another URL or the site changed since his review. In any event, I hate sites that you need to analyze for an hour before you can figure out what's what. While I could be wrong and missed something, I don't believe that to be the case and spending more time on the site trying to figure it out wasn't going to help.
The only subjectivity in my comments I believe is the quality of the wimmin. If you like tatoos and wimmin that look like wrestlers and have tits that can knock you out cold, then you might like the site more than me. But you'll have to contend with the other negatives.
It's so frustrating. I find Spanish and Eastern European films to be my favorite. This was such a let down. |
|
04-05-14 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
56
|
Czech AV
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Thank you for the review. As a result, I joined and I really like this site, for the most part. I feel very guilty though. There are some really creepy videos on here, especially if they're for, uh, real. Like anonymously spying on wimmin type videos encompass a large share of the videos. Is it for real?
|
12-25-13 11:46am
|
Reply
57
|
Czech Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Thanks.
I am in complete agreement about the weaknesses. It seems it would take so little to make this a perfect site.
|
04-21-18 05:33am
|
Reply
58
|
Czech Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks!
It's always a pleasure writing a complimentary review.
I haven't been overly active in joining sites. And the ones I joined, I had nothing new to add to previous reviews. Which is all your fault. It seems you reviewed most every site on the Internet -). And we're all the lucky beneficiaries for that.
|
04-20-18 04:15pm
|
Review
59
|
Czech Casting
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Realistic amateur casting site with inexperienced and mostly cute Czech babes
• Great layout – each video has a thumbnail photo along with tags to make it easy to decide whether the scene is of interest
• Large variety of women to suit most everyone’s taste
• Newer scenes (after 2015) are in ultra HD (or lower quality) / good streaming quality
• Exclusive content
• 1,885 scenes as of this writing
• 2 updates weekly
• Zip files for photo sets in high resolution; 360-degree view
• Czech dialogue with English subtitles
• Search feature fully functional
• CCBill is the processor
• Great customer service |
| Cons: |
• Camera work is lacking
• Standalone site – it used to be part of the Czech AV network
• While not a big complaint, it’s a little pricey for a standalone site at $29.95 monthly recurring
• As with most sites, the scenes are formulaic and become tedious at times |
| Bottom Line: |
Czech-casting is very much what one could hope for in a casting site. Realism, cute and inexperienced babes along with a simple but adequate website design.
The women seemed to come from every walk of life. 18-year-old students to 60-year-old grandmothers, thin to plump, pretty to not so pretty, etc. There are very few drop-dead gorgeous women. If you’re looking for that type of model, this site is not for you. There are plenty of glamour sites that fit the bill. What you get here is a realistic cross-section of women. But no worries, there are plenty of pretty girl next door types.
Each scene has the same setup, which at times can be monotonous. The scenes begin with the model seated and answering questions by an off-camera female. The questions are virtually identical, i.e., name, age, where from and then it gets more and more personal. For the most part, I liked this segment since the responses are varied and often interesting. However, it takes up about half of the video, too long.
Then there’s a brief segment consisting of posing where the model strips naked. Last is the “money” scene, either softcore or hardcore. You’ll know beforehand what you’re in for from the tags on the thumbnail that you click to download or stream. The scenes, whether hard or soft, follow a similar formula. There’s only a few male actors and they dictate the scene’s direction which is similar from one scene to the next.
It’s been 5 years since I was a member and was hesitant to rejoin. The earlier stuff consists only of a small percentage of hardcore and virtually nothing in the way of fetishes, i.e., anal, lesbian, threesomes, etc. That’s all changed. The majority of scenes since 2016 are hardcore and there’s a fair amount of anal, some threesomes and even a number of scenes including pissing.
I also wasn’t thrilled that they’re no longer part of Czech AV, a network of 30 something Czech sites. But the quantity as well as quality of the scenes in Czech-casting mitigated that somewhat.
I didn’t use the search feature very much, but it seemed to work fine. Searching for a model is pointless since each model only performs one scene, at least from what I can tell. But searching tags, i.e., hardcore or anal, will get good results.
I can’t speak highly enough about customer service. I had a problem with download speed. I received quick responses to emails (bearing in mind that they’re in the Czech Republic) as well as expert help. They had a tool to diagnose the problem and after a couple of days, it was solved. This is the type of support you get from a major company that values customer service.
In my view, the biggest and most avoidable drawback was the camera work. It seemed to be mostly POV or with a couple of cameras placed on tripods. I’ll also take them to task for the length of the interviews. They were far too long, and I found myself fast forwarding often. And my last peeve is the lack of originality in the “money” scene.
In the end, I have no hesitation in recommending this site for anyone that has any interest in the casting niche. |
|
04-20-18 10:16am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
60
|
DesiPapa
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're took kind, thanks.
|
04-23-17 10:58am
|
Review
61
|
DesiPapa
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Authentic Indian / Paki porn.
• $12.47 monthly recurring (PU price), renews at $24.95
• Epoch is the credit card processor, no issue canceling
• Downloads and streaming (streaming available only in latest videos)
• Daily uploads, 6 on the day of the review (caveat – I don’t know how true this is considering the latest uploads suffer almost as badly in production value and video quality as the oldest ones, see below)
• There is a stunning model (Shanaya) who does solo scenes – some fully clothed and others simply posing naked. The downside is that there’s no sex including masturbation |
| Cons: |
• Production / camerawork terrible
• Poor video quality, newer videos slightly better but generally 480 or less
• Lack of good looking models; many are overweight and/or geriatric
• Video length for many videos/clips is under 5 minutes, some under 1 minute
• No search function though sorting can be done by date added, model/set name and popularity
• While there are brief descriptions of the videos, most are too general or nonsensical
• Beware of a pre-checked sale cross-sell at sign-up page
• Occasional English voice-overs make the clips seem that much more surreal as well as comical |
| Bottom Line: |
The site consists of mostly Paki and Indian soft and hardcore porn shot on location. There is even some R-rated stuff. The scenes range from solo (which varies from clothed to masturbation), to blowjobs, to some lesbian and hardcore as well. Solo and blowjobs dominate. There are also many webcams that were transferred to video.
For various reasons, there is a dearth of Indian porn available, a topic beyond the scope of this review. Since there is so little of this genre available, I won’t completely dismiss DesiPapa despite its incredible lack of production values and shortage of good looking women. Even though many, if not most of the videos/clips are under 5 minutes (including a number that are under 1 minute), there is a wealth of material available. Some of it is passable and may make the site worthwhile if you don’t mind spending time weeding out the junk. If I had to quantify – and this is purely subjective – I would say that 5% of the videos pass the litmus test.
There are 4 sections for content as follows:
• Movies - over 6000 clips/videos – from 45 seconds to 25-minute seemingly homemade amateur videos
• Masala videos – 200 clips /videos – I could not differentiate this section from the above
• Bonus Content – 350 clips/movies - If there ever was a misnomer, the “bonus” section is it. It’s a real hodgepodge but mostly indistinguishable from the above sections except for having some international content
• Pictures – 150 sets of about 50+ photos each of a generally hot Indian model posing with clothes and/or nude. However, I could not find a way to download, a huge minus. Like the videos, quality is horrible – very grainy. No updates since 2010
It should also be pointed out there is an option for sex chat but I didn’t investigate.
I am not an expert in this matter, but if I had to guess, I’d say the clear majority of the scenes were shot using one cheap camera or old smartphone on a tripod or propped in a stationary position affording only one angle. For example, there are at least several scenes showing the guy on top in missionary with only his hairy behind and back in view for the entire clip. Most videos/clips are dimly lit which is sometimes a blessing in disguise.
Many of the scenes are downright weird, not in a good way. The descriptions also leave a lot to be desired, though at least there is a description. For example, one called “Pakistani Couple from Lahore,” - the description reads “we are a young Pakistani couple that enjoy make sex (sic) together.” This 14-minute video features the couple lying in a bed for 12 minutes fully clothed and sharing a cigar. The last 2 minutes he sucks her breasts. Not exactly titillating. There are several short clips which show a woman pleasuring herself that only shows a hairy pussy and finger. These are two examples of what is to be expected.
I’ll make another supposition that many of the clips were homemade. This would help explain the lack of quality in most every respect. It should be noted that one scene had an imprint, “xhamster.com.”
The site will undoubtedly appeal to some porn fans, particularly those hungry for anything Indian. If you really want to see Indian porn, the choices are very much limited. DesiPapa is probably as good/bad a choice as the few other such sites. Personally, I’m not overly disappointed considering the scarcity of the genre. It was worth $12 to see a handful of decent scenes. However, some may find that the work involved in finding appealing scenes not worth the effort. I won’t be back. Once is enough for me, adios or Namaste DesiPapa. |
|
04-23-17 07:14am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
62
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
Thanks for the comment. Would you care to elaborate a little more? Previous comments (including TBP) inferred less than stellar quality, though that was a while ago. Are the videos HD? Are they updating? Another earlier complaint was that the scenes were very much alike.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
|
05-29-17 02:18pm
|
Reply
63
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
"What? You can’t post updates on the weekend?"
Haha.
Not my thing but i enjoyed the review. Thanks for the post.
|
03-17-17 05:12am
|
Reply
64
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Nail. Head. As a young lad, GM used to go to sleep every night with pictures of Lily. Sometimes he'd wake up in the middle of the night and couldn't help buy resurect Lily. A very mischievous God deviously cured this blasphemy. GM's eyes were taped open (ala Clockwork Orange) while being fed intravenously and forced to watch anal scenes until he begged for mercy. Remarkably, he held out for 2 years.
Anyway, I digress. I joined the site and I'm a little surprised you didn't mention a couple of the other sites in the network except the sucky one. Analquest seems right up your, uh, alley. With something like 250 videos of, well, guess, it's the highlight of the network for me. Virtually every scene had a knockout young Eastern European, the guys varied and the scenes varied somewhat.
I had high hopes for another one of the sites, Jizz on Teens or something like that. They're all threesomes, 2 wimmin, 1 guy. Unfortunately, I believe they're all blowjobs, no more.
Last but not least though maybe I'm missing something, I was let down by the Double View site after your review... normally, I can tell if something is for me after reading your review. I didn't think the camera handling was a big deal. As you stated, the casting premise was just plain stooopid (ok, my words), but the scenes were good otherwise.
In any event, I have no regrets and would highly recommend the site. I'd probably give it in the low 80s. Thanks again for your very informative review.
|
05-26-14 05:34am
|
Reply
65
|
Double View Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
thank you once again for an incredibly informative review.
Normally after reading one of your reviews i can immediately decide whether to join. However, I'm on the ropes on this one. I've got plenty of petit/gorgeous Russian/eastern European doing anal in my collection. I ask, do I really need another one?
This will help make up my mind - how are the "bonus" sites? I know you said one sucked, not in so many words though ;). And how is the billing? After some bad experiences, I now factor this in.
Thanks again for your contribution.
|
05-13-14 04:10am
|
Reply
66
|
Dyked
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the review. I consider any review to be excellent that can help me decide whether to join a site.
Regarding upper case, while content over format is by far always my primary concern, it's nice to read text pleasing to the eye. While I'm not near a Windows computer at the moment, I believe that in order to change between upper and lower case in Notepad, all you need do is select the text and right click to toggle to choose upper or lower. In Word, similarly, highlight the text and press SHIFT + F3 to toggle the choices. Not a big deal to me though one way or the other.
I use Word to write reviews. I had to learn the hard way too many times not to write reviews directly in PU lest the cloud gods will have a field day with it. And like RA, I don't write reviews in one sitting any longer. I generally write them over a few days while I'm learning about a site.
Last and a little more controversial, is reviewing sites in a network. If you recall, I suffered a great deal of angst about this not long ago and brought it up in the forum.
I've settled on scoring and writing such reviews based solely on the merits of the individual site or the network as a whole - one or the other. I try not to give much weight when reviewing an individual network site that it is part of a network other than mentioning it. To each his own though and this is not meant as a criticism of anyone else. Hell, far be it from me to be judgmental about a matter I've had such a hard time coming to grips with ;)
|
05-12-17 04:59am
|
Reply
67
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Many thanks.
I thought the same as you about the content not being up my alley and it basically isn't. I think our taste is similar. But I kept watching cuz it was so different in the respect that it was fun and playful, not to mention hot for what it is. My suggestion is to wait a bit until PU twists their arm and gets a PU discount. -)
|
05-05-17 08:51am
|
Reply
68
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Aw, thanks.
|
05-05-17 08:05am
|
Reply
69
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Commentary continued
Streaming includes 2 options, high and low definition. I find that having a low definition choice is a great option since I generally stream just to get a preview. It’s less time consuming then loading the stream in HD.
To give you an idea of the playfulness of the site, the first set centers around a parody of the TV show, “Blind Date,” or more specifically, “Blind Date Goes Ersties Porn Version.” Included in the set, in addition to a parody of the game, is an interview conducted by head honcho Paulita Pappel with one of the models centering on the blind date theme. Strangely, this video is in English with German subtitles. (Some of the videos are in German with no subtitiles.) Also in the set is a video of a parody of the game show. Lastly, there’s another video of the chosen couple having sex.
Solo scenes don’t necessarily include masturbation – one called “Lap dance” simply shows a nude model breathing heavily and moaning while sort of dancing. The audio is stated to be binaural, a special audio technique like 3D. I did not test this with ear plugs and had no desire to do so. Others may find that the audio makes a big difference.
I found many of the interviews tedious and boring. On the plus side, they’re realistic, candid, cover a range of topics and sometimes funny. One model is asked the very original question about her favorite position. The response was hilarious: “Just lying down.” But really, I don’t need an exhaustive biographical interview for each model. I guess that’s why the fast forward button was created.
The site is a refreshing change from the usual in most every respect. Hopefully, San Fernando and other sites will take a cue from Ersties. Despite some flaws, I highly recommend the site for those that like this niche, more like a cross between softcore and hardcore with models (not actors!) and a crew who seem to be enjoying themselves. I am generally not such an abundance of solos and lesbians as well as softer hardcore, but I enjoyed Ersties very much. The site deserves to be praised for their innovation.
Membership options (no PU discount offered):
$29.95 monthly, recurring at $35.00
$35.00 1-month membership non-recurring
$45.00 3-month membership [best deal]
$84.00 6-month membership
$132.00 12-month membership
|
05-04-17 09:13am
|
Review
70
|
Ersties
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Epoch and CCBill are the credit card processors which translates to no problem
• No dl limit
• Exclusive content
• Secure site, uses https
• Unrehearsed
• Amateurs
• 2 streaming options, high and low definition
• HQ DL option – 720 and mp4’s (early videos are lesser quality)
• HQ photos
• Pages have informative write-ups about models, not the usual baloney
• Very nice and playful design which generally works well from a technical and visual standpoint
• Ability to add to favorites or like which enables you to track models
• No pre-checked cross-sells |
| Cons: |
• Inability to view all content by individual model in one place
• Videos not dated, unable to determine update schedule though I’m guessing there’s 1 update weekly
• Only 1 DL option (though not a bad thing for me as 720 is just right for my needs)
• Photo sets not available for download, or at least I could not figure out how to do that
• Descriptions of early sets are in German
• A handful of broken links – error message indicates copyright issues
• Many videos do not have subtitles; at least one had subtitles in German
• No PU discount |
| Bottom Line: |
I almost dismissed Ersties as a girl’s site. However, I came to realize it’s much more than a romantic semi-hardcore (and softcore) site geared for a predominantly female audience, although it does meet that criteria. Many of the scenes are downright hot and erotic. The “players” (that term seems more appropriate than “actors,”) are amateurs (not amateurish!) and seem to be enjoying themselves. However, if you’re looking for serious hardcore including anal or gonzo or various fetishes, Ersties isn’t for you.
Erst is German for one. I’m assuming the name of the site is a takeoff on first-time models. It is a German site run by a woman (Paulita Pappel) and manned [ahem] mostly by women. It features mostly German and other European amateur models and couples in unrehearsed sex. However, I did notice a few American sets. The models are mostly natural, pretty or ordinary next-door girl types. However, there are at least 3 models that are obese and probably not a turn on to too many people.
The site is made up of real people having fun, not actors doing stuff they don’t particularly like. The clear majority of the content – interviews and videos – seems completely unrehearsed including the occasional orgasm. There is nothing over the top, at least that I noticed, like threesomes or anal or other such hardcore. There are several orgy videos, but they’re about the tamest such scenes I’ve seen. And they have an almost believable plot! Most videos are solo, some containing only nudity. The rest are lesbian or couple. The earlier sets are mostly solo. I did an estimate of the types of videos based on a sampling, not all that scientific:
• Solo (masturbation or just nudity) – 65%
• Girl/Girl – 30%
• Girl/Boy and other – 5%
Navigation is weird, but not bad weird, just different. After a while, I grew to appreciate it. The best way to access content is through the “Updates” section. This option includes all the videos and photo sets on the site. To get to each of the 925+ sets, you click on a photo in the “Update” section and you are taken to a page with the model(s) relevant videos and pictures. In general, a set consists of a photo set (ranging from a handful of photos to up to 50) and videos. The videos include an interview video of the model or couple. It seems there’s one interview for each model or couple. The interviews are generally biographical and various sexual subjects are discussed. Unlike other sites, the interviews are not standardized or formulaic. Occasionally, the interview is the only video included in the set, which is strange. However, there are usually 1 to 3 (generally 2) more videos which contain solo (softcore or hardcore) or couple content.
Or you can go to the “All Models” option and scroll through the models. However, there’s a serious flaw in this section. While models may (and generally do) have more than one set, they are listed separately for each set in the “All Models” section. For example, if you want to see all of Rebecca’s videos, they’re not located in one place and you need to access them separately. The models are not listed in any order that I could discern, like alphabetical. However, you can use the search function to look for a specific model.
There is an option called “English” which I don’t quite understand. It’s laid out like the “All Models” section yet there are significantly less sets included. One can only conclude that these are English models, duh. However, it makes no sense to segregate only English.
There is a search function under the “All Models” and “English” options, though it seems limited to searching by model name or video title. Strangely, there is no search option in the “Updates” section.
There is also a cams section (labeled as new) and you can buy tokens on the site. The cost is about 10 cents a minute. It looked interesting if you’re into that sort of thing. I didn’t investigate.
Finally, there is an interesting section (labeled as new), “La Petite Mort.” As per Urban Dictionary, “The little death is translation from the French "la petite mort,” a popular reference for a sexual orgasm. The term has been broadly expanded to include specific instances of blacking out after orgasm and other supposed spiritual releases that come with orgasm.” When you click on the “La Petite..” option, you are taken to a page of 9 photo sets (6 photos each) of gorgeous women. There is also a video that can be downloaded in HQ and is up to 10 minutes in length. The videos depict the woman masturbating and having an orgasm, very hot. I’ll go out on a limb and assume this section will be updating since it is new.
Doing the math, not counting interview videos, there are probably close to 2000 videos of action. That’s calculated by multiplying 915+ sets by an average of 2 action videos and including the videos in the “Le Petite Mort” section. They all average about 15 minutes in length.
Continued in comments. |
|
05-04-17 09:13am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
71
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
I joined over the weekend for 29.95 recurring at 35.00. I'm fairly certain that this was not a special PU discount. I experimented and went to the site directly (not through PU), no cookies, and got the 29.95 price. Among other subscriptions, they offer 29.95 recurring and 35.00 non-recurring. This seems to be aimed at everyone. Amanda, you should twist their arm for a better deal!
Elephant, this is a unique site in terms of structure, frivolity and playfulness. However, the content is not for everyone as with most any site, including me though the jury is still out. I will likely do a review in short time.
Generally speaking, I don't understand how the custom of charging the same (or more) for subsequent months makes any economic sense. I have to think that the vast majority of users download most of the content they want within a month. It's the law of diminishing returns. Why pay the same or more for subsequent months when you're getting less? I can see doing it for streaming, but that's it.
|
05-01-17 02:03pm
|
Reply
72
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, in hindsight, I've got to disagree with you here. Just because a site provides content doesn't mean it should warrant a listing on a trusted review site. That's my opinion. Better content can be found on free sites, seriously. And more importantly, this site is engaging in murky financial policies. I believe PU would be doing more of a service to members to take the listing down rather than have them experience what I have.
|
09-03-14 02:20am
|
Reply
73
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I'm not sure what benefit to other users a review would serve. I literally spent under 45 minutes on the site and there's not much to add then what's in the comment. And I'm not going back there because there's not much else to see and I'm afraid I'll suffer sever psychological trauma if I have to look at it again, haha. Again, still feeling my way around, but doesn't the comment serve the same warning that a review would?
|
09-03-14 02:13am
|
Reply
74
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Ok, gotcha. I'm still feeling my way around this murky new world. Lesson learned.
|
09-02-14 07:02pm
|
Reply
75
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
No argument from me, guilty as charged. My only concern is why PU or TBP would continue to list a site with info 4 years old and more. That really is the only rationale I had for joining, the mistaken belief that if it's listed on these sites it's on the up and up. Still, mea culpa.
|
09-02-14 06:07pm
|
|
