I had joined this site a while back when joining through TBP gave you the upgrade for free. That free upgrade is no longer offered. What I didn't realize was how useless the PSN membership is without that upgrade. I was planning to rejoin soon thinking that it wouldn't be too bad, but after reading your review I think I'll reconsider that. You just saved me some money and frustration. Thanks!
Access to those older titles is one of the reasons that I like PSN. My concern about PSN is the opposite of yours - that they'll run out of stuff from the 1990s to upload.
Great review. This is one of my regular memberships. I like having access to the older stuff and agree that the quality on those can be pretty bad, but I suspect that's more a reflection of the original than how it gets uploaded.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 175 studios (some major, some niche)
- 9000+ DVDs
- Many individual scenes independent of DVDs
- Some exclusive sites
- Updates daily
- Adds new studios
- Supports download managers (IDM for me)
- No obvious time-outs for files
- TBP / PU special membership makes it really worthwhile
Cons:
- Not all sites update
- Like other DVD mega-sites, there is a lot of crap to sort through while looking for the gems
Bottom Line:
I wrote a review of this site about a year ago after my first membership here and after re-reading that I can say that it all still applies. I know that I’m not the only PU member who regularly visits the same sites so my perspective in this second review is to give some thoughts about whether it is worth joining a second or later time. I’ll cut to the chase, the answer to that is certainly yes, but it isn’t as easy a decision to make as with some other sites.
PSN suffers from a similar problem to other DVD sites, namely the availability of new material to keep updating the site. Like Videobox, PSN uploads five DVD titles per day. Unlike VB though, PSN doesn’t put the complete title up at once. You may see a DVD that you really want only to find that the scene you really want is due to be posted later. The good news is that you usually won’t have to wait more than a few days to get all the scenes in that DVD. The problem with that uploading schedule for both PSN and VB is that they have to upload a lot of crap to keep to it. The good news is that, in my opinion, PSN uploads less crap than VB.
The site is large, with over 9000 DVDs already posted from 175 studios. The studios range from the biggest of the big names like Elegant Angel and Private to more niche oriented studios. In short, there is likely something here for everyone. It appears that PSN continues to add studios because, as I noted in a comment a few weeks ago, they are now the only site I’m aware of that has Max Hardcore DVDs available for download. Yes, Max is polarizing, but I still think it reflects well on PSN to licence and make available these titles, even if they are the edited American versions.
The site continues to offer downloads in multiple formats, with AVI, H.264 and MPEG being the most common. The H.264 files come in at 720x540 and look decent so only true ‘size queens’ will miss higher definition scenes.
I use Internet Download Manager and had no problems. The links didn’t time out in the time it took to download them and download speeds were as fast as I see with most porn sites.
One problem that I perceived (and am open to being corrected on if I’m wrong) is that there is some overlap within the sites themselves. Take the site Sperm Cocktail which offers a lot of Brandon Iron’s material including his series “A Good Source of Iron.” Sorting the site by DVDs gives you all the DVDs obviously, which you can then click on and download the individual scenes from each. You can also sort by scene which appears to includes a lot that isn’t on the DVDs but that is mixed in with the same scenes that are on the DVDs which means that you will likely end up downloading some stuff twice. This is no big deal if you don’t care to associate a scene with the DVD it is from, but for those of us who like to organize by DVD it can be an issue.
While this likely won’t happen if you join, I will point out that both times I did I had initial problems and I’ve read of others having similar problems. The first time I joined they had just started offering the full access to TBP/PU members and I got missed. This time after paying my fee I was given limited trial access. The good news is that on both occasions customer service was helpful and resolved the problems quickly.
One advantage to a rejoin is that during your first time through you’ve likely downloaded all the material you wanted from the several sites that no longer update. Most of these are solo model sites where the model has left the business. This is an advantage on a rejoin because PSN still has a download limit of 100 files per 24 hour period and many of the files on the older sites are small so you can hit the limit. I’m no fan of limits but I have to admit that the one here is pretty reasonable. It would have to be a rainy, hung-over Sunday to hit the limit.
One point that bears mentioning even though it is a repeat of what I said in my original review is that if you want to join this site it is very important to join through TBP / PU. Joining through TBP / PU makes what might be a decent membership and makes it a great one. The difference is that joining through here gets you access to the otherwise-optional Moviez material which is really the bulk of the good material on the site.
In my opinion, PSN is definitely worth a re-join. They continue to expand and even add new studios. They offer a great collection of mainstream American porn along with a good mix of lesser known European material and even some niche stuff. I’ll definitely be back again too.
For those who are interested in Max Hardcore’s work, Pornstar Network has recently added 35 titles. The Max stuff is part of the Moviez add-on which comes free if you join through TBP or PU. These are all the North American versions which are a little more sedate than the European versions of the same videos. The site appears to add a couple of videos per month.
Here’s what they have on the site:
Extreme School Girls 9 and 19
Hardcore School Girls 2 and 17
Hollywood Hardcore 5, 6 and 11
Max Don’t Fuck Up My Mommy 1 and 2
Max Extreme 2, 5 and 11
Max Faktor 11 and 19
Max World 11
Maxed Out 4, 13, 14 and 17
Planet Max 6, 12 and 19
Pure Max 4, 5, 12 and 15
Universal Max 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 12
Just to set the record straight, after a bit of a wait the support team resolved my issue and my membership is active. I still think that there is a problem with how the TBP discount is handled by the site. I've joined twice and had membership problems twice and others report similar issues at TBP. The good news is that they have good customer support.
I just joined this network a few minutes ago and got the $19.95 discounted price offered through TBP / PU. I have an email confirmation of that. I accessed the site to see this: “You currently have a Free Limited Membership. This gives you access to a limited streaming time of each video. To download full videos or get access to all streaming videos, you need a full membership.” That, obviously, costs more money. I emailed the site support staff and asked for clarification. I’ll report back when I have an answer but for now I’d avoid this site as you might have the same problem.
The last time I joined here I had a membership problem too. There seems to be a problem in the way their site ‘sees’ the TBP discount.
Reviewing sites is never objective. I agree that a download speed of 800MB/sec is objectively better than a download speed of 400MB/sec. Same with higher resolution being better than lower resolution. I try to take those objective measures into accout in my reviews but it is impossible to be completely objective. I gave PornStar Network a 90, but I can see how someone else would give it an 80 or a 95. You might give it an 80 because they don't really have a lot of videos of older BBWs in thong bikinis. That's a valid criticism and worthy of an 80 as long as you explain why you gave it an 80. I think PSN is a great site and I realize that a lot of my opinion is subjective. I really liked the site - it was huge and there was a lot of stuff there that appealed to me. I've already recommended it to two porn friends.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- When you join through TBP/PU you get full access to the entire site
- Huge archive of material
- Large volume of DVD porn
- Large volume of semi-exclusive stuff
- A lot less overlap with other DVD sites that you might expect
- Wide range of genres covered
- Decent collection of 1990s porn
- Good download speeds (not extremely fast, but slightly better than average)
- Excellent customer service
- new scenes added daily
Cons:
- Navigation can be confusing
- Search function doesn’t work well
- Many DVD scenes are listed under a created title that can be confusing (instead of listing it as Taylor Rain in Taylor Rain Gets Fucked in the Ass Volume 74, the scene might be listed as “hot teen brunette fucked in the ass.)
- Download limit of 100 files per day (which for most people isn’t too bad, but some of the older scenes are broken down into smaller files so that might cause more of a problem
- No HD options on even the newer stuff
- Some of the exclusive sites aren’t updating (I can’t and won’t fault PSN for this since the most likely cause is that the model has left the business)
Bottom Line:
In the past when I’ve had friends ask me how they can turf their collection of 1980s Hustler mags and join the new world of internet porn, I steered them to Videobox. I’ll still do that, but I’ll also tell them to get a membership at PornStar Network too. This is a great site with access to a great mix of DVD porn and some seemingly exclusive stuff too. Many of the best models from Quebec are here. (The site is run out of Quebec, so that makes sense.)
The site also features access to over 130 porn studios, some major, some smaller. Some studios have almost 600 DVDs here. The smaller ones less. What surprised me was that there was not as much overlap with Videobox as I expected. Even in the studios that both have, there were titles here that I couldn’t get elsewhere.
One factor that could have been a serious negative has been turned into a positive and is a reward for those of us who hang out at TBP/PU. The membership for those who stumble in from the open web is tiered: your basic membership excludes access to “MovieZ” files that make up about 50% of what is on the site. That sucks, unless you join through TBP/PU. Doing so gives you full access to the entire site, and there is a lot of material here.
All the extra material that you get is accessed through PSN but it is all watermarked as VideosZ. I can’t say for sure that PSN gets you access to all of VideosZ stuff, but it must be close. If you’re considering a VideosZ membership this might be the better value.
Many of the files have some options for download, though the premium stuff through MovieZ is only available as AVI files.
Download speeds average about 650MB/sec, though that can get higher on occasion. One problem I encountered several times was that while download speeds remained the same, the navigation speed dropped off to the point where it was frustrating to use. That didn’t happen often, but it was annoying when it did.
Pictures are available on most of the exclusive sites, but I don’t download those so I don’t have a lot of detail. Zips are available.
Search and navigation functions aren’t up to standard, but once you figure it out you can muck about. Sometimes DVD scenes can be catalogued using a description that makes it harder to find if you’re looking for a star or a title.
This probably isn’t relevant now, but when I joined they were in the process of giving PU members full access and I was missed somehow. The customer service was excellent and fast. (Two thumbs up to the TBP staff for their help with this too!)
The bottom line is that not only will I recommend this site to porn buddies, I already have. The video quality and navigation are about industry standard, but the sheer volume of porn here makes this an excellent value whether you’re just starting out or whether (like me) you have enough titles to rival the best porn store in the country. To top it off, the material is a good mix of DVD and more exclusive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network
- 26 model sites
- 1389 videos
- Multiple options for downloading videos
- 1973 photo sets
- Photos available as singles or zips
- Many of the photo sets are large (500+ photos)
- Updates daily
- TBP/PU discount
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Videos play automatically when page loads
- Photos are relatively low quality
- Too many ‘enhanced’ models for my tastes
Bottom Line:
Pornstar Platinum Network is a large network of 26 pornstar sites. Several A-list models have sites here, like Amy Brooke, Tegan Summers and Trinity St. Claire. The model sites work great for narrowing your search for scenes and photos with a specific model but the main network gives access to everything. There are currently 1389 videos and 1973 photo sets uploaded across all the sites in the network. The network updates with one upload per day (either a video or a photo set) and these are spread across all the sites.
The network layout is far too rudimentary for its size. There is a search function available and you can sort by individual models through the sub-sites and sort by videos or photos.
The site started in 2009 but the videos uploaded then were pretty low quality. Some are as low as 480x320 and 1000kb/s. That wasn’t good even for 2009. The good news is that the newer videos are a much better quality at 1920x1080 and 10,000kb/s.
The photos aren’t great quality whenever they were posted. Older photos are 1500x1000 and the newer ones are 1600x900. The photos are available as singles or zips and some of the photosets are huge with over 500 photos.
The site supports download managers and download speeds were good at all times. I had no issues with links timing out.
I can’t give a definitive answer as to whether much of the material here is exclusive but I suspect that a lot of it is. I collect a lot of Amy Brooke’s stuff and I didn’t recognize any of the scenes as ones I had already seen.
This is subjective, but I don’t like fake breasts and there seem to be a lot of them on display here. Two of my favorite models, Amy Brooke and Trinity St. Claire, had ‘enhancements’ and spoiled their appearances by looking unnatural.
Another pet peeve of mine is also found here: when you load a video page the video starts playing automatically. That hogs bandwidth and if you forget to turn your speakers down it can be a bit embarrassing. In my opinion, streaming is an option, not something that should be foisted on all users.
Speaking of downloads, there is usually the option of downloading a WMV or MP4 file. My preference is MP4 but I downloaded a few WMV files to compare them. The few I looked at were 1920x1080 but had a very low bitrate of less than 2000kb/s so they looked badly pixilated even on a 24” monitor. My advice is to watch a few to make sure you can live with the lower quality before downloading a bunch of WMV files.
Overall I’m sitting on the fence as to whether I’d recommend this. There are a lot of good things about the site, like its size, regular updates, photo sets and videos, but on the downside the network isn’t well laid out and a lot of the older material is low quality. The deciding factor for me was access to a few specific scenes at the low TBP discount price. If you find yourself in that same situation then you’ll at least go in knowing that the network is less than perfect.
(I should add that one of the sites in the network is called Fukks. It seems to be a stand-alone site that is only affiliated with the main network. It requires entering a username and password, but my main network login wouldn’t work.)
I can't believe that you listed that as a con. Since you're new here, I'll give you a tip - the webmasters run a tight ship (as they should) and you shouldn't expect any password sharing around here.
Otherwise, a decent review. Based on this and the others I may check this site out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Attractive semi-amateurs
- Multiple sites in the network
- Playful scenes shot in Hawaii
- Scenes available in multiple resolutions
- Photos available
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Site design is a decade old and it shows
- Scenes aren't dated
- Doesn’t appear to update frequently
- Scene resolutions are just okay
- Photos not zipped
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line:
For the purposes of this review I’ll treat POV Porn, Peter Girls and Beach House XXX as a network since a membership to one gets you access to the others. At least one other site also used to be included with this membership, Lap Dance Gone Bad, and while that is still shown in the tour pages I couldn’t find any way to access it.
I last joined this site in 2010 and I really liked what they had to offer so I rejoined recently. The porn is still very good but the site hasn’t grown much or improved in the past seven years. In fact, it’s hardly grown at all since all I could find that seemed new over those years were approximately 50 scenes.
One thing that I really liked about the site was that most of the scenes had a really playful nature about them and allowed the model’s personality to show through. I’m a big fan of outdoor scenes and there are a lot of them here as the site is based in Hawaii. Several scenes are available with beach nudity, blowjobs and even sex.
This network had a lot going for it in 2010: it offered some hot solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes with many models who didn’t seem to appear elsewhere. While that is certainly a positive aspect it can also be seen as a negative one because it is less likely that prospective members would be enticed to join to get access to scenes from a specific model. The only well-known models that I saw on the site were Cody Lane and Taryn Thomas, both of who have been retired from the business for many years. (As an aside, when I first joined this site seven years ago one of the scenes that I particularly liked was a scene shot very early in Taryn’s career. She wasn’t even using the name Taryn Thomas at the time.)
Assuming that a prospective member would be looking to join for the first time in 2017 the biggest detriment to the site is that it really is a relic from 10 years ago. Whether you are looking at the tour or the member pages you are likely to be struck with how dated they look. Unfortunately, this late 2000s feel to the site also shows up in many of the scene resolutions. While many of the newer scenes do have acceptable resolution you don’t have to go back too far into the past to find resolutions that were probably just marginal even 15 years ago. To make matters worse, many of the older scenes are only available in segments. I’m not technically astute, but it seems to me that a webmaster would want to consider remastering some of the older material or at least stitching together into one download. To be fair, some of the resolutions aren't bad. The best I saw was 1440x1080. Interestingly, this resolution is usually offered with two bitrates, one around 3000kb/s and the other around 8500kb/s. These higher bitrates are only offered on the few scenes posted in 2013 and 2016.
While the heyday of the site was certainly the late 2000s there have been some more recent entries. While a majority of the scenes show a copyright mark from 2009 or early there are some scenes that have copyrights from 2013 and a few that have copyrights from 2016. I have been a member at the site for just under a month now and can report that there have been no updates during that time. On the main page there is a list of 17 future updates but there is no timeline for when those may be uploaded.
Further indicating that the site is not particularly active is the fact that the site owner, Peter Romero, has a blog on the site where the most recent entry is from 2009.
The site does also offer photos and it is entirely possible that back when the site was active that the intention was that it would appeal equally to video and photo collectors. Unfortunately, that probably didn’t work out all that well because for some reason the photos are not offered as a zipped download. Like the videos, the photo resolution varies widely.
The site supports download managers and I had no issue using one. This is largely irrelevant, however, because the file sizes are not particularly large. I didn’t encounter any download limits but given that I downloaded fewer than 40 scenes it is unlikely that I would have hit one anyway.
Deciding on whether or not this site merits a recommendation is difficult. On the one hand this collection of sites offers some exclusive porn featuring some beautiful ‘amateur’ models who don’t seem to appear elsewhere in scenes shot on location in Hawaii. On the other hand this great porn is let down by a site and technical aspects that belong in the last decade. My opinion might be different if the site offered a generous TBP discount but at full price I just don’t think it offers enough for anyone other than a serious collector to consider it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good quality POV scenes
- Part of a bigger (but relatively small) network
- Mostly amateur models
- Some porn stars, before they were stars
- Good selection of scenes
- Updates (I’m unsure of the schedule though)
- Pictures (but no zips)
- The scenes aren’t over-produced; they have a ‘fun’ feel to them
- Good value when joining at the TPB / PU price
Cons:
- Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards
Bottom Line:
Two things to start: 1) this review pretty much applies entirely to Peter Girls too. They are part of the same network. POVPorn.com is hardcore-themed, while Peter Girls is more softcore, with some oral and handjobs. 2) I wouldn’t normally submit two reviews for a network, but I joined through Lap Dance Gone Bad which turned out to be just a small secondary network site. POVPorn.com and Peter Girls are the main sites and deserve a separate review.
I drafted this review a few days ago but didn’t post it. I’m glad I gave it some time since I’ve completely changed my position on this after watching many of the scenes again. This review may be a lot more subjective than I’d usually write. I really like this network. Peter Romero makes some excellent porn. It isn’t technically superior, but that adds to some of the amateur allure. He reminds me of the early days of gonzo porn when it was being shaped by guys like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. This porn looks like it was fun to make, and that makes it fun to watch too. (Peter – If you read this, PLEASE make more Lap Dance Gone Bad scenes! That is an under-served niche.)
It is difficult to say precisely how many scenes are on this one site because there is a lot of cross-linking between the two main sites. The sites appear to date back to 2001 and some of the scenes date back to then. Needless to say, the quality of those scenes is low as was the standard then. Most of the older scenes are also broken into smaller files. Between the two sites there are easily over a hundred scenes. The site says they update frequently and they do update though I’m not certain as to the schedule. The newer scenes are available in three sizes, with the best being 3300kbps. Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards. Average speeds are 250KB/sec. I can report that the medium quality scenes (1000kbps, 640x480) look good.
There are also photos available for most of the scenes, but there is no option for zips.
The best feature of the site is the models that they have. The site is not skewed to professional porn models, though some are here. Of those, most of them seem to appear very early in their careers. For example, Taryn Thomas appears in 2004 (her career began that year) as Brynne. It’s fun to see her and others so fresh in the early days of her career. Many of the other models are unknown to me and appear to be true amateurs.
I’m not a big fan of the POV genre, but Peter makes it work and is able to capture the action well without making himself the star of the scene or shaking the camera so badly that the scene is unwatchable. For POV, this is well done.
Joining the network through TPB / PU gets you a reduced price. For that price you get some really decent porn. It has a true amateur feel to it – and I mean that in a good sense. If you like amateurs, porn stars before they were stars or POV, this site is worth a membership.
This site is part of the Burning Angel network, which features models with lots of tattoos, some piercings and generally with a Goth or punk look. Other than the fact that the models aren’t generally mainstream, this is a fairly standard POV site. It is a large site with 196 scenes. It updates on an irregular schedule but it appears to be that at least two scenes per month are added per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very rare niche (I’ve never seen another site that specializes in it)
- Lots of videos
- Amateur models
- Bundled with another good site (Glory Hole Secrets)
- Options for streaming and downloading
- Photos available
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Some of the models aren't typical porn models (which some may consider a good thing)
Bottom Line:
I wouldn’t normally write a full review for a site that is bundled with another site, but POV Wars merits an exception. For one, many may see this as the primary site and Glory Hole Secrets as the add-on. For another, it’s in an unusual niche that people may have an interest in but not be aware that there is a site that caters to it.
So what is this unusual niche? It’s a bit hard to describe but may be best described as one girl and five guys. But it isn't a gangbang site; the guys have sex with the girl one after the other and each session forms a different scene. Each model’s ‘session’ starts with her sitting on a couch and being interviewed. Then the first guy comes in and from then on most of the scene is shot POV style, with some shots from a camerman. The guy and girl chat a bit, she undresses, goes down on him, they have sex and he finishes, usually with an oral with swallow. Then the next guy comes in and the process starts over again. If this happens to be important to anyone, the girl is dressed at the beginning each segment. So the best way to describe the niche is that it’s ‘girls pulling a train’ if such a niche exists.
It’s difficult to say precisely how many scenes are here because, for one thing, the set-up lends itself to at least two interpretations of what a scene is. Is a scene all five sessions with one model or is a scene one session and each model then has five scenes? The definition is further blurred because most of the ‘scenes’ are broken down into five ‘sessions’ each downloaded or streamed separately while some scenes are downloaded or streamed as the full scene with all five ‘sessions’ in the same download. Confused? Here’s what I can say for sure: there are currently 167 videos available to upload featuring 42 models. Some of those are full-length scenes but most are broken down into separate sessions with each guy. It does appear that since the beginning of 2015 all of the new scenes added are full-length with all five ‘sessions’ in the download.
One new scene per week is uploaded.
The same models here are those found on the sister site, Glory Hole Secrets. That’s good and bad because if you like true amateurs you’ll like this site but many of the women don’t fit the typical porn ideal. That’s not good or bad, it’s just a fact. There are different ages and body types represented.
Streaming is available in two different resolutions, one which is labelled as HD. I don’t use streaming so I can’t give an opinion on that. Downloads (all MP4) are available in 1920x1080 at 6000kb/s, 1280x720 at 3500kb/s, 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones and devices. While the bitrates are lower than I’d expect for the screen resolutions they still look good.
I don’t think anyone would consider this a photo site but they do offer photos for those who are interested. Currently there are 21 photo sets available (these appear to be of the full scene with all five guys). Photos sets had been uploaded weekly but stopped in December 2014 so if you join for photos there may not be any updates coming. Photos are available as singles or zips in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720.
The site uses a simple layout which is all that it needs. You can sort by scene, by model or by tag. With a niche this narrow you really don’t need a lot more.
This site has a lot going for it: it has enough available to make it a decent value on a site that is simple to use with good download speeds and it supports download managers. It also comes bundled with Glory Hole Secrets which is a good glory hole site. But what makes the site stand out is the niche it offers. I’m not aware of any other site that focuses solely on this kind of scene and for that reason alone many people may consider joining. For all of these reasons I’d recommend checking the site out.
Thanks. My annual membership runs out in October and I'm planning to rejoin one of the sites with the hopes of getting another offer. It seems from what you and others have written that this offer, or something like it, is pretty common.
I think the deal I have is different from the one you have. My recollection is that after joining Passion HD I was offered an annual membership for a one-time payment of $69 that included other sites. Either way, this is a great deal. When my annual membership expires this fall I'll definitely look to rejoin.
When I signed up for the annual membership I was given access to Passion HD, Casting Couch X, Lubed, POVD, My Very First Time, Exotic 4K, Fantasy HD, Tiny 4K and Pure Mature. Soon after that Holed was added, which suddenly changed this great value to an excellent value for me. A couple of weeks ago a site called SpyFam was added. I haven't downloaded anything there yet but it looks good.
So do I read your comment correctly that you have access to Baeb too? I've read other comments that say that the access changes depending on when you joined but that seems to run counter to the fact that I've had two sites added since I joined. Baeb is a site I'd like to join but I've been reluctant to in case it gets added to my existing membership.
Do you access to any other sites that are different from what I have besides Baeb?
Great review. I like the level of detail you provided and the rationale behind some of your comments. Reviews like this make PornUsers a valuable tool.
I'm glad I was able to offer you some information. I hope it was useful when you made your decision to join.
If I had reviewed the site I'd have probably come in right around 85 as you did. Yes, it's a small site and very expensive, but I don't judge value on quantity alone. Bukkake / Gokkun is rare and it's even more rare when it's well done and that would push the score up here.
If they fixed their pricing the score would go up. I'm not saying that if they allowed full downloads at $20 per month then I'd recommend the site. I'm willing to pay for high-quality niche sites. And I do have to confess that the weakness of the Canadian dollar these days isn't the site's fault.
I didn't have an opportunity to review this site when I had a membership a few months ago as it hadn't been listed yet, but I can confirm everything positive and negative that you've noted. The site offers some amazing porn in a very-rare niche and they do it well too. But the tiered membership has to be simplified if the site is to get a wider audience.
(I wonder if one of the cost drivers is that this site uses better male talent and therefore has to pay them? I read in Ashley Blue's book Girlvert that JM Productions would put an ad in a sleazy LA newspaper looking for guys to do the American Bukkake shoots. All they needed was a certificate showing they were STD-free.)
I also wonder if the site producers priced it this way figuring it was in a narrow niche and to make any money they needed a few perverts to spend a lot. I think they're wrong and that if they priced this site lower they could earn more by tapping into the large number of porn watchers who would buy in a at more reasonable price.
Let's hope your review drives some business their way.
Oops... I didn't answer your question on value. I really liked the scenes but I don't think I'd pay for the Diamond membership simply because of the currency exchange with the Canadian dollar. A Diamond membership would set me back something above $100. I don't mind paying for porn but that's a bit pricey for me for one site.
The site looked like it had a lot of videos but that was deceiving because each scene was uploaded three times. There was an upload from two different cameras and then there was a BTS upload that was titled "Best Scenes." My experience was that the Best Scenes was the better of the uploads since it contained all of the bukkake footage and added in some extras.
When I joined back in March (2017) there were maybe 15 models available and each of those had three videos available. I just looked at the website and it looks like they've added a lot since then.
I had the least expensive membership available and there were several videos that I couldn't view for the entirety of my stay there.
This is subjective, but I liked the scenes. They were well lit and well produced which isn't the norm in this niche. There was a range of models too, in terms of age and body type though all were attractive.
I should also point out (again from memory) that most or even all of the scenes were more Gokkun than bukkake. I don't recall any where the model has her face covered in cum. In the scenes I recall they men came in the model's mouth and she'd take a dozen or so loads and then spit it into a glass and then take another dozen and so on. At the end of the scene the model would drink the cum.
One thing I recall that I found hot was that each model had a 'helper' who assisted. I'm not sure why I found that hot, but I did.
Let me know if you have any specific questions and maybe my synapses will fire and dust off some distant memory from last month...
I was a member there a couple of months ago and can confirm mbaya's comment on pricing. If you want access to everything this will be a very expensive membership.
It is a good bukkake site though, and those are rare. Obviously a site like German Goo Girls is a better value but until they drop Centrobill as their biller they won't have me as a customer.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
