Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2251
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Only two more reviews and you'll have the #2 spot... But considering how many points our friend exotics4me has I doubt he's in any danger of either of us overtaking him.
My 'problem' with writing reviews is that I'm just not subscribing to many sites these days and when I do they're most likely sites I've joined in the past and have already reviewed. This is the longest 'dry spell' I think I've ever had.
|
03-20-19 09:07am
|
Reply
2252
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for posting this. I've been having a dry spell with memberships these days but this might be an offer that's too good to pass up. I'm a big fan of Teen Fidelity and the teen scenes at Porn Fidelity.
I noticed that you're only two reviews away from kicking me out of the #2 spot here. I'd better get over my dry spell, join some sites and start reviewing again!
|
03-16-19 10:05am
|
Reply
2253
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Reply
I'm purely and A and B man myself, but I certainly understand liking REAL large breasts.
|
08-03-13 05:57am
|
Reply
2254
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Review
Interesting review. Like you, the emphasis on big breasts (fake or real) means that I'd likely not consider joining. But since your review made that clear you may have saved me some money!
|
08-02-13 08:12am
|
Reply
2255
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Interesting group of sites. I was a member of one of the sites a few years back but I don't remember it being part of a network. If that's new I might need to take another look at this. Access to some select bonus scenes is a big plus too. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
01-16-16 10:11am
|
Reply
2256
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
It baffles me why sites and networks do this to their paying customers. This network used to be among my favourites but I haven't joined in several years and based on your review I likely won't. Massage Creep and Jurassic Cock were among the best available in their specific niches but I don't think Massage Creep updates much anymore, if at all, and Jurassic Cock hasn't updated in years. If those two sites ever start updating again, especially Jurassic Cock, I'd probably still join but use a disposable card and tread carefully.
Of course, since their tour pages are crap there really is no way for me to ever tell if Jurassic Cock starts updating again.
|
03-18-18 12:26pm
|
Reply
2257
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
turbopancakes's Comment
It seems that trying to figure out porn billing practices and billers is a mug's game...
|
02-28-18 02:26pm
|
Reply
2258
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the link. I have a couple of index sites bookmarked but I was looking for one that tracked by website. I guess I'm stuck in the Dark Ages with IAFD, though, to be fair, they are listing websites now.
|
11-07-16 04:42pm
|
Reply
2259
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather.
|
11-07-16 03:47pm
|
Reply
2260
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Very thorough review. Thanks for posting it.
It's disappointing that Jurassic Cock no longer updates as it was among the best old/young sites on the 'net when it was active. I know it isn't a niche that most people are interested in but old/young sites that feature top U.S. talent are few and far between.
|
11-06-16 06:15am
|
Reply
2261
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
You might be right. This might be another form of regional pricing. That sucks. Maybe try clearing you cache and see what happens.
|
09-20-15 06:09am
|
Reply
2262
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I just checked and the TBP discount for a one month membership is there. Maybe it was a temporary glitch.
|
09-19-15 12:42pm
|
Reply
2263
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
C1aud3's Comment
Hearing stuff like this bugs me, because I've faced it too. You'd think that in an industry being battered by piracy that companies would step in quickly to assist a paying member. It seems more companies have bad customer service than companies with good customer service.
But sadly, this isn't just in the internet porn world.
|
01-09-14 04:10pm
|
Reply
2264
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
With similar names being linked with a porn site I could see this ending badly!
|
01-08-12 04:46pm
|
Reply
2265
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Great review! I'm a big fan of this network too. I particularly like Jurassic Cock and was pleasantly surprised at how well done Massage Creep is. I figured a single-theme site like Massage Creep would be boring, but they manage to keep it interesting.
|
10-08-11 09:33am
|
Reply
2266
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
My only experience with a massage site is with Massage Creep. I had low expectations because I find these single set-up sites can get boring. But I was pleasantly surprised to find that even though the scenes all follow the same structure they still manage to be hot. I'm sure a lot of the credit goes to the person hiring the girls.
As for Jurassic Cock, this was the reason I joined the network. I don't have an old-guy-young-girl thing, but TBP made it seem interesting so I joined and was really happy with it. I tend to search out a lot of older porn (80s and 90s) and don't get a lot of exposure to new models so this site introduced me to a few that I'll continue to watch for.
I had the same thing with the reported scene lengths in Public Violations. Most of the scenes are really short anyway, and the many of the ones that have the wrong times listed seem to be over, so I think it is just a typo.
And finally, I will always question their decision to use so much of the fake-cock-fake-cum stuff. It makes no sense to me.
|
06-14-11 03:48am
|
Reply
2267
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I've just wrapped up a membership and agree with everything you wrote. Several of the sites are excellent and worth the subscription alone. I really liked Jurassic Cock and Massage Creep is very well done. I found myself watching the scene setup that I'd normally skip.
And the fake cock/cumshot sites... I can't imagine that these are a big draw but they must be since there are several sites that use them almost exclusively. I can see watching one or two for the bizarreness of them, but they get old fast.
And Public Violations is an interesting site too. It's obviously staged, but still fun to watch.
|
06-13-11 06:42pm
|
Reply
2268
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Pat362 - Thanks for this review. I've been looking for a site to join for a few days now and came across this network that had me reaching for my wallet - until I read your review. Since you pointed out that they use fake cum and only have a limited amount of anal, I'll keep my credit card in my wallet for now and keep looking. You saved me some cash...
|
12-05-10 01:20pm
|
Review
2269
|
Porn.com
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Huge archive of DVDs (almost as many as Videobox)
- Excellent price at $9.95
- Good variety of videos
- Some ‘classics’ available
- Not a huge overlap with other DVD sites |
Cons: |
- HUGE variation in download speeds sometimes
- Occasionally download speeds make site temporarily unusable
- Confusing interface (until you get it figured out)
- Very little content available in HD
- A lot of reliance on compilation videos
- Downloads as mp4 |
Bottom Line: |
The reviews and comments on this site are all over the place, and I can understand why that is. Had I written this review a few days ago it would be completely different and have a very low score. I wouldn’t have recommended it then either. First the good news though.
(Also, I should point out that there is more to Porn.com than just the DVD site. All I’m reviewing here is the DVD site though.)
This site is huge and offers an amazing variety of DVDs from a large number of studios. If you’re like me this may actually sound like bad news if you’re no stranger to Videobox. The obvious worry is that there would be so much overlap that this site would be poor value. But surprisingly there isn’t nearly as much overlap as I would have expected. Also, if you’re into ‘classics’ from the 80s and 90s (older too), Porn.com has a fairly good selection. When download speeds are good, they are vey good. I saw close to 2MB/sec on some downloads.
Also on the good news front is the fact that the videos can be sorted in many different ways. I particularly liked being able to sort by category. There is also an effective search function that allows you to search names or keywords.
Now for the bad news. First, the site is definitely confusing to use until you get it figured out. Once you find a scene in a DVD you want you select a button to download it. That takes you to a new screen where there is a button clearly labeled for download. But it never worked. Along the right hand side of the streaming screen there are a series of icons. It turns out that one of those will bring up yet another smaller screen that will then allow you to choose the size and format that you want. Of the hundreds of scenes I’ve downloaded I can’t say that more than a handful were available in HD.
The biggest problem with this site was the variability of download speeds. I can live with some variation – I suspect that’s normal with all sites depending on peak traffic. But I’ve never seen anything like this. My first two days with this site I was only able to download a handful of scenes. The rest of the time the site was impossible to use. I literally saw speeds that would make someone with dial-up angry. I cancelled my membership immediately and looked for some advice from the PU forums. Luckily messmer and others convinced me that things would improve. And they did. While it was less than convenient to have to download on their schedule, I made it work. When they had the server capacity download speeds were excellent.
The bottom line is that this can be a great site. I know that lack of HD for some is a deal breaker, but if not I would actually recommend it for the great value. Be prepared for some frustration though, and when the server supports it, be prepared to download then because it might not last. |
|
07-21-10 09:57am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2270
|
PornDoe Premium
(0)
|
|
11-12-18 08:20am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2271
|
PornDoe Premium
(0)
|
|
11-12-18 08:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2272
|
PornDoe Premium
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Huge Network of 41 sites
- Wide variety of niches
- Many sites actively updating
- Varied models
- Four resolutions available for most downloads
- Logical site layout
- Several tools to sort scenes
- High production values
- Fast downloads
- Supports download managers
- TBP discount |
Cons: |
- Not all sites are updating |
Bottom Line: |
Full disclosure – I won this membership in the recent TBP/PU contest. I’ll still keep this objective though.
I find writing network reviews to be much more difficult than those for single-themed sites because of the size and scope that many networks have. In that vein, this is one of the most difficult network sites I’ve ever reviewed. To plagiarize Xander in his thorough TBP review, this network really does have something for everyone.
The network has over 2700 videos available over 41 sites. Each site has a specific theme though some of the sites share similar themes. There is glamcore, hardcore, extreme, bondage, lesbian, public sex, sex in vehicles and the list goes on. Some of the sites feature models from Spain, Italy and one site is dedicated to French Canadian girls.
I hesitated to join this network on my own dime because I don’t usually collect scenes with most Eastern European and Russian models. While there are EE/Russian models here many are from Western Europe. I didn’t include this as a con because for many people it won’t be one, but I found that some of the models were more amateur in that they don’t have the typical porn model look. Many of them are older, a bit larger and, in my opinion, not particularly attractive. But… keep in mind that my porn tastes are narrow and limited to young and petite. I also found that there were a lot of tattooed women and a lot of fake breasts. There are a lot of natural large breasts too. The good news is that even with my relatively narrow interests I found a lot to like and if your interests are different from mine I’m confident that you’ll find a lot to like here too.
I’d normally list the available sites but with 41 sites I’d run out of room. I’ll likely add that information as an addendum in a reply. Otherwise describing the scenes across the network is also impossible due to the wide variety of niches. The good news is that the site offers a comprehensive tour so a prospective member can really kick the tires before joining.
The scenes all appear to be exclusive to the network and I found that the production values on all of the scenes was high. These are professionally shot and edited scenes.
The network adds a new scene daily. It’s only recently that the updates are dated so I can’t comment on how the network updated in the past. Several of the sites on the network aren’t currently updating.
Networks as big as this one can be difficult to navigate but this one does a good job of enabling a member to break it down into bite-sized pieces. The sites are all dedicated to a specific niches and there is a ‘categories’ tab that allows you to sort specific interests across the whole network. Those individual tabs cover all of the usual interests and a few more obscure ones. You can also sort the network by individual models. There is a search function but I didn’t have a need to use it because I found the scenes easy to sort with the tools available. The network is so large it’s best to use the available tools to sort for what you want.
Even the oldest videos on the network are offered in multiple resolutions, including at least one HD offering. While there are some anomalies on the site the majority of scenes are available in 428x240 (650kb/s), 854x480 (2000), 1280x720 (2500) and 1920x1080 (6000). The resolutions seem relatively standard across the network but the bitrates can vary a bit.
I had no problems using a download manager to queue scenes but because I opted for the 720p files they were a reasonable size so I didn’t have to queue much. The download speeds were fast and on par with the best I’ve encountered. I went looking for a download limit and didn’t hit one nor did I experience any throttling. (I find some European sites seem to have speed issues at different times during the day but I didn’t experience that here.)
As I didn’t sign up for the membership I can’t comment on the billlers but the TBP page lists Epoch as primary and Segpay as secondary. Both of those are reputable billers so I wouldn’t have hesitated to join on my own.
One final disclosure – while I know some PU members frown on this I will likely post reviews of a couple of the individual sites. I’m not doing this to add to my review count but because several of the sites feature unusual and under-served niches that may be of interest to other members. There is, for example, a site that features a lot of public nudity and sex. That niche isn’t common so someone may be interested in having more information on that.
The bottom line? I highly recommend the network. It really does have something for everyone. If you like a particular niche you’re apt to find it here. If you like a particular look you’re likely to find that here too. With 2700+ scenes across 41 sites this is an excellent value at full price and an even better value with the TBP discount. |
|
11-12-18 07:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2273
|
PornDoe Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
This has been on my radar for a while. Based on your review I may finally take the plunge. Thanks for the warning about the cancellation issues. If I do join I'll go in with my eyes open.
|
01-23-18 04:17pm
|
Review
2274
|
Pornstar Legends
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Access to approximately 200 “classic” porn movies from the 70s, 80s and early 90s.
- A good selection of titles from each of those decades
- Website is well laid out with good ability to sort titles
- Scenes can be sorted by film title, star name or general theme of scene
- An opportunity to get access to scenes from many well known porn stars
- Decent, but not great, download speeds
- Full access trial
- Some bonus sites available |
Cons: |
- Due to the age and quality of the originals, some files are grainy
- Doesn’t appear to be any titles not widely available elsewhere
- Some models only have photos on the site
- No ability to sort by production date (that I could find)
- The bonus site offering classic porn has the same offerings as PSL |
Bottom Line: |
Good God, some of these women have pubic hair! I remember that! Yes, pubic hair, the relative rarity of anal sex and the gentle treatment of women seem to be the key differences between porn from a couple of decades ago and porn of today.
I stumbled on PSL after TPB did an initial review a short while back. I’ve been thinking of taking a membership to a “classic” site but I wanted to be sure that I’d be getting value for money. PSL certainly delivers value for the price.
An obvious issue with any older porn is the quality of the originals. Some of the files here, especially the older ones on the site, are poor quality. I can’t fault PSL for this because the scenes have obviously been digitized from old film or video. The newer scenes on the site (from the late 80s and early 90s) are generally very well captured and don’t look much different from new standard definition material being shot today.
The biggest plusses of the site are access to about 200 film titles ranging from the 1970s to the 1990s. There may be stuff from earlier, but I wouldn’t necessarily recognize it as such. Let’s just say that there are scenes where Ron Jeremy looks like he just graduated from high school. Having access to the films, of course, also gives access to a number of great stars from the same eras. The obvious stars like Ginger Lynn, Amber Lynn and Christy Canyon are there, but so are some stars that I had forgotten about. Candie Evans was a big favorite of mine and I had forgotten about her until I rediscovered her here. And I had forgotten how stunningly beautiful Shauna Grant was when she did porn. She is the equal to any A-lister since then.
The site doesn’t have a search function, but it does have multiple ways to sort the material that is there. You can sort by complete DVD, by star or by theme. These work well.
The site also has pictures, which don’t appear to be zipped.
Speaking of pictures, one of the reasons I joined this site was because it advertised Tammi Ann was on it. She is, but only in photo form. Most models have a scene or two (at a minimum) here, but a few only offer pictures. That wasn’t clear when I signed up.
The bottom line is that this site offers decent value and I’d recommend it if you like classic porn. There is a good selection of material, though most of it is also available on other sites. The site offers useful and effective ways to sort through what they have to find what you want. I hope they continue to grow and put the effort into maintaining the site, though I realize that there are a finite number of titles available. |
|
06-16-10 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2275
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
I reviewed this site four years ago and scored it high because at the time when you joined through TBP/PU you got all the upgrades for free. And four years ago the resolutions they offered were more in line with the industry standard. It's sad to see what was once a great company turn to scamming paying members just to stay alive.
Thanks for posting the warning. I'll never join this site again.
|
08-15-16 02:49pm
|