| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2226
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
To their credit, it is mentioned clearly in the Terms of Service. But 15 downloads per month??? That's insane. It looks like another attempt to foil pirates that only hurts legitimate paying customers.
|
07-21-13 08:13am
|
Reply
2227
|
Pinup Files
(0)
|
Reply of
runnoft's Review
Welcome to the site. I hope you stick around and continue to contribute.
Great username... If you ever run into Mrs. Hogwallup please tell her I said hello.
|
05-02-15 05:28am
|
Reply
2228
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I'm not usually into solo girl peeing, but I'd make an exception for Riley Reid! Let me know if you rejoin and find the scene.
Riley has her own site now and she seems to be doing a lot of stuff that she doesn't do in mainstream DVDs - like more anal. Maybe she'll do some peeing scenes on her own site.
|
01-12-16 05:32pm
|
Reply
2229
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Amen to CC processors losing some of their clout. It bugs me when sites are compelled to self-censor to appease the bankers.
On a semi-related note, I really like finding peeing in scenes where it is unexpected. Last Year Maddy O'Reilly had an incredibly hot scene at Brazzers (http://www.brazzers.com/tour4/scenes/vie.../8361/sex-on-wheels/). The scene was hot anyway but at the end the guy pees on Maddy. I wasn't expecting that and that scene will be a favourite of mine until I can't watch porn any more. I've read that Maddy has since developed a bit of a pee fetish. I should see if I can find more of that.
|
01-10-16 08:46am
|
Reply
2230
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I didn't realize that peeing was such a narrow niche. It isn't something I'm into all that much but I'm definitely not opposed to it. I suppose that to someone who is opposed to peeing content might look at my collection which includes past memberships to VIPissy and Pissing.com and wonder why I say I'm not a peeing content collector but I guess I just don't see myself as being on the same level as someone like you.
That's too bad that this seems like a tough niche to crack into.
I wonder if this isn't a sign that we're coming into a time when censorship (including self-censorship) is more in vogue?
|
01-09-16 07:13am
|
Reply
2231
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks for the detailed answer. It has always baffled me that people bash stuff that is outside their main interest without realizing that there are lot of customers who like specific things. So maybe that particular forum was a bad choice for Kink to discuss the new site since Kink is all about hardcore. The reality too, is that for a lot of BDSM people, watersports can be a big part of D/s play so maybe if Kink marketed the site to a specific audience they could have done better.
But, as you say, they were pushing the limits so this outcome was probably inevitable. I wonder if this is what happened to Water Bondage? But I suspect the risks on that site probably caused them to rethink it.
I can definitely say this though: I'll never delete the Pissing.com scenes I have. Same with Water Bondage.
|
01-06-16 03:28pm
|
Reply
2232
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I had subscribed there a few times and liked it, but the content certainly had changed. I remember when the site first went up it was much harder than it was when I went back more recently. I didn't follow the site closely enough to see storm clouds though. What happened? What did you notice? Did they go so far as to remove the content?
|
01-05-16 01:55pm
|
Reply
2233
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I'm glad they keep the site available even if it isn't updating, but I do wish that they'd be very clear about that and reduce the price accordingly.
|
04-05-12 08:45am
|
Reply
2234
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the comments.
I agree with your assessment of the site. I alsways skip the pre-scene interview because while it's probably there for a legal reason it can be a bit of a mood killer. I do wish that the site had stuck to Kink's BDSM theme more.
|
04-01-12 06:45am
|
Review
2235
|
Pissing.com
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 31 scenes
- Mix of girl/girl and boy/girl
- Typical Kink quality
- Good mix of porn stars and relative unknowns
- Videos available in multiple formats
- Photos available (singles and zips) |
| Cons: |
- Only 31 scenes
- No longer updating
- No clear indication that the site isnt updating
- Doesnt have the same BDSM feel that other Kink sites have
- Price is a little high for a small site that doesnt update |
| Bottom Line: |
The streaming videos on this site are excellent. Okay, okay, Ill try to keep the pee jokes to a minimum here.
I know there are mixed thoughts here about sites that are no longer updating. Jpg386s comment on this page certainly captures the view that a lot of PU members have on the topic. Im with the members who think that whether a site is updating or not is just one factor in the value equation.
The site is part of the Kink.com family of sites and as such it is offered as a stand-alone site so a membership here does not give you access to any other Kink sites. Being part of the Kink network the scenes are well shot with lighting, sound and editing all being in the top tier of adult sites. Whoever manages the technical stuff sure is a real whiz. (Sorry, I couldnt help myself) What certainly helps too is the female talent. There are many well-known porn stars on the site, such as Amber Rayne, Flower Tucci and Annie Cruz, and there are also a lot of lesser-known models. Many of these lesser-known models (to me, anyway) also appear on other Kink sites so I presume that theyre more known as fetish models rather than mainstream stars.
The site is relatively small, offering only 31 shoots. The shoots are shorter in duration then most other Kink offerings, most being less than 30 minutes long. That certainly starts to move the value marker to making this a less than great value. Some of the scenes have a bit of a set-up where the models play a role, and others have no set up and just have people peeing on a woman. The one constant is that the scenes arent a peeing free-for-all: there is usually one female model who is the receiver. Having one submissive model is really the only link that the site has with the BDSM roots of the Kink family tree. People looking for hardcore BDSM with peeing probably wont find what theyre looking for here. Neither will people who want to see women peeing on men, because most Kink sites have dominant men and submissive women and that remains true here. Jpg386 commented that the site features mostly a bunch of lesbo scenes where laughing girls pee on each other. I dont agree with that in that of the 31 scenes on the site only six are all-girl. The comment is correct, though, in that the mood in the scenes tends to be a lot lighter and less menacing than on other Kink sites. Im not really sure why the director opted to be less BDSM-themed; it may be that Kink figured that the site was pushing the legal limits as it was and adding in a BDSM element might make the religious right go nuts. Or more nuts, I guess.
Being a Kink site, the technical stuff is well done. Each scene offers a trailer, photos and video. Video is available as a stream or downloadable as a WMV (HD), WMV, MP4 (HD) and in sizes for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV HD scenes and they come in at 1280x720 at 7200kb/s and 30fps. Theyre in Codec 9. Subjectively they look great.
The photos are available in two resolutions (800x533 and 1200x800). Theyre available as singles or zipped. While these resolutions arent great, you have to consider that the most recent ones were shot at least three years ago when these would have been excellent quality. Which leads me to the biggest negative of the site
Pissing.com is no longer updating and hasnt added a new scene in about three years. I can understand that a site may stop updating and Im not going to fault a site owner for making a business decision to stop shooting for a site, but I do wish that Kink was a bit more open about the fact that the site is no longer active. Back when Kink stopped shooting for Water Bondage they had a disclaimer that the site was no longer updating (but it seems that theyre trying to revive it). Eventually that disclaimer was removed. Same for Pissing.com. To make matters worse, Kink stopped listing the dates of the shoots so it is almost impossible for a prospective member to know that the site is no longer adding new material. This seems strange for a company that otherwise does everything else right and has a reputation for treating their customers well.
So is the site worth a look? I think so, but a person should consider the value for themselves. Ive had memberships at similar themed sites before and can say that the Kink way of doing things means that Pissing.com is pretty much the number one site for number one. (Sorry again thatll be the last joke.) There are 31 great scenes that look good and are available in most ways a member would want them. I do hope that theyll reactivate the site some day, and until then I do wish theyd be more open about the sites status. Until they start filming again, they should lower the price to better reflect the true value of a small, inactive site. But even with that caveat, if you like this niche, Id recommend the site for sure. |
|
03-31-12 11:03am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2236
|
Pissing.com
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Its a Kink.com site so it is backed a reputable company
Exclusive videos
Hardcore, but not misogynistic
Some very beautiful models and some interesting set-ups
Photos and videos, as well as a trailer for each shoot
Weekly updates (Tuesday)
Long videos most are around 30 minutes
No DRM
Zips available for the pictures and videos
Fast downloads (I average 350+ kb/sec thats at least 100kb/sec faster than I get with Videobox) |
| Cons: |
Site is still small because it is new, but it updates weekly
No options for file sizes |
| Bottom Line: |
Pissing.com is the latest offering from Kink.com. If you like fetish videos, then you probably already know Kink. Kink is probably the premier fetish site on the web today. (I say probably only because I dont know of any company that does it better.)
The set-ups are pretty much the same the girl starts clothed, and in most cases she starts the peeing by doing it herself. Then one or more guys come in to add to the fun. Pissing.com is different from other sites that I know of that feature peeing. Max Hardcore does pissing as part of a rough sex scene, unlike Pissing.com which makes pissing the sole focus. The only other site where Ive had a membership is Piss Mops, which is part of the Meat Members group. Like Max, Piss Mops is pretty misogynistic, and that would be a turn off for lot of fans who are just into watersports and not seeing women degraded. I know this sounds strange, but Pissing.com doesnt degrade the women. The women seem to be willing and eager participants. Another benefit of pissing.com is that since pissing is the whole focus, the videos are long for this genre. The average video is probably 30 minutes long. This is good, but the trade-off is that the models dont get a real hosing off. Most times the pisser takes his time.
Since I labeled the pissers as male above, that raises an issue that some people may find fault with. The site is primarily male on female pissing. There is some female on female, but not much. I prefer male on female, but as the site grows, maybe those of you who like f-on-f will get more.
File sizes for videos average 250MB and can be downloaded as a zip, though it still unzips into a number of smaller videos (usually 3 to 4). This is a great feature that is used throughout Kink sites. Photos are also available as a zip. There are no options for file sizes but the resolution is fairly good. The videos arent DVD quality, but they are still very good. The bit rate is 2140bps, with the screen resolution being 960x540. There is a small but unobtrusive watermark in the lower left corner.
The site is new, so it isnt too big right now, but the webmaster says that there will be weekly updates on Tuesdays. I have no doubt that this is the case as every other Kink site updates weekly. (To give full marks to Kink.com, when they stopped updating Water Bondage they informed everyone. Lesser sites would just stop and continue to collect money.)
I know I might be accused of being a Kink.com shill, but apart from being a very satisfied customer I have no relationship with them. All of their sites are top quality Id go so far to say that they set the standard. If you like fetish stuff, check out Kink. I can report that they are also customer oriented too. I had a password problem (of my own making) with a membership to another Kink site and they responded to my email in less then 24 hours and they recommended and implemented a quick and easy solution. |
|
11-28-08 04:33pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2237
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I got burned by "a" Playboy site once too. I say that I was burned by a Playboy site because I think there are several that use the brand. I was signing up for a one-month membership and as I went through the screens to confirm the purchase I didn't notice that the site defaulted to an annual membership on one of the screens. Needless to say, the site wasn't sympathetic. It would have been a poor value for a month but it was a complete waste for a year. I downloaded some stuff but I've since deleted it.
|
03-04-19 04:32am
|
Reply
2238
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks to the staff here at TBP, especially Mike, there was a solution. I didnt get the refund I was asking for but I was compensated. I still think my request for a refund of the annual membership and me paying for a one-month membership was a reasonable request. As I understand it both Playboy TV and Brazzers are under the same company though the individual sites are owned separately. The parent company obviously couldnt persuade the Playboy TV site owner to issue a refund so they compensated me with a membership at Brazzers. The parent company didnt need to do that so I am grateful for their generous offer.
I wouldnt exclude joining Playboy TV because of my issue. I made a mistake and if I was paying attention I wouldnt have made that mistake. Think of it as being like not noticing a pre-selected cross-sell. I think the Playboy join page is a little misleading in that the TBP one-month discount is highlighted but the annual membership is pre-selected. But still, I should have paid more attention.
Thanks for asking.
|
12-05-15 07:38am
|
Review
2239
|
Playboy TV
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Playboy quality models
- Mostly natural models
- Good mix of niches and themes
- Many download options
- Mostly soft content (some hardcore)
- Photos available
- Allows download managers
- TBP discount |
| Cons: |
- Models are uncredited
- Bitrates are too low
- Username and password are randomly assigned
- Wide variation in video quality even within a series
- Photos dont seem to have a zip option |
| Bottom Line: |
Before I weigh in on this review it might help if the reader knows that while Im familiar with the Playboy brand and magazine Im not familiar with any Playboy videos or any Playboy channel. This is obviously Playboy-produced stuff, but I dont know if this is run on the Playboy channel or if this is web exclusive. Being affiliated with Playboy would suggest high-quality content and that is what youll find here. Locations are great and production quality is great.
Being part of the Playboy brand means that most of the models are beautiful. You will find some fake breasts and tattoos but most of the models are natural. I dont think I need to explain to any reader what Playboy models look like: thats what youll find here. One problem I found is that in most cases the models aren't credited within any scenes. If you find a model you like good luck identifying her. If you do identify her through, you will be able to source more of her stuff through her model page.
The site gives you access to 92 different shows. These range from casting shoots, spring break stuff, strip club stuff to some hardcore material. There is a wide range of niches available. Within each of these shows there may be multiple seasons and within each season there are multiple episodes. Given that variation I cant give an accurate number of how many individual scenes there are but I can say with confidence that this site does have a lot of quantity to offer.
The site is well-organized and its easy to find something youll be interested in. There is a search function but I didnt find it to be very useful. But since the site is laid out so well there really isn't a need for much of a search function. Being able to sort by shows and models gives a lot of functionality.
Something I didnt expect (but probably should have) is that many of the shows follow a reality-TV format. I downloaded and watched two series that featured strippers and strip clubs. Im a fan of this niche and was expecting a lot of stripping. There is some of that but most of the series focused on the drama among strippers and between management and the strippers than any actual stripping. This is also the case for most of the other shows too.
There is some hardcore on offer but it is best to think of this as a softcore site with a little hardcore thrown in. Dont join expecting Playboy-quality models in hardcore scenes because youll end up disappointed.
Probably the biggest flaw in the site is the video quality. Most videos are offered in multiple resolutions (with MP4 being the only format) but the focus is on the lower end of the scale rather than the upper end of the scale. Resolutions of 272p, 320p, 368p and 480p are offered with most videos. I may be missing the point here, but it seems to me that offering both 320p and 368p is a bit pointless. If youre viewing on a phone would there really be that much difference between those two files? The upper end of the scale isn't as well served. On many files the best you can get is 720p. Those come in at 1280x720 which isn't bad but theyre let down by a bitrate of only 2500kb/s so they look pixilated on even a 24 monitor. Some scenes are offered in 720p with a higher bitrate of 4000kb/s but even that is low by todays standards. Some, but not many, files are available in 1920x1280 with a 6000kb/s bitrate again, thats low and should be improved. One thing I found both odd and frustrating was that within a season of a show there were variances in the resolutions available. Episode 1 might offer both 720p bitrates and the 1080p while Episode 2 only offers the low-bitrate 720p file as the highest quality. Presumably these scenes were shot and uploaded around the same time so this variance is baffling.
Photos are available but they appear to be screenshots. If there is a way to download the photos as a zip I couldnt find it. The photos are 1920x1080 but I found the few I downloaded to be fuzzy but that may be intended.
I used a download manager to queue-up files and didnt experience any problems. The download speeds were average. I didnt experience any limits or caps.
There is a TBP discount offered but make sure you select that as the annual membership is the default.
A final beef I have with the site is that it randomly assigns a username and password and these are just a random uses of letters and numbers so they aren't likely to be memorized. Further, when you sign in you can select the remember me option but that doesnt work.
I recommend the site as long as any member goes in knowing what theyre getting. Think of this as reality TV with some extra spice thrown in and a bit of hardcore for good measure. The site has a lot to offer but could be greatly improved by offering better bitrates as the ones they offer now are too low. Having a TBP discount makes this site a great value but be careful to make sure you select that option. |
|
11-01-15 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2240
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks. I appreciate the (potential) offer of assistance. I emailed MBI Probiller several days ago and haven't heard from them. Even if you guys had a way to contact Playboy TV that would be a big help. All contact links on that site redirect to MBI Probiller and it seems they aren't interested in helping or even giving me an email contact for their client.
|
10-13-15 09:05am
|
Reply
2241
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Maybe I'm out of line here, but I don't think that what I'm asking for is unreasonable. I'm not asking them to cancel the membership and let me walk away. I want to pay for what I intended to buy. If this were a bricks-and-mortar store this wouldn't be an issue. I'm hoping that the person on the 'support' chat this morning was just having a bad day. Heck, I'd even pay the full monthly fee and not the TBP discount price.
So I've emailed MBI Probiller and asked them for one of two things: either reconsider their unwillingness to help me or give me a contact email for the Playboy site. Every contact link on the Playboy site directs to Probiller so when Probiller tells me to take it up with Playboy that rings hollow.
Whether Probiller even responds to the email is another question though...
|
10-11-15 11:41am
|
Comment
2242
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
|
10-11-15 06:51am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
2243
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Comment
Having to call someone to cancel is a deal-breaker for me. I wouldn't join this site for that reason alone. Thanks for the warning.
|
01-04-14 09:34am
|
Reply
2244
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.
It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.
I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.
|
11-05-11 09:00am
|
Comment
2245
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
|
04-16-09 03:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2246
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Reply
I had seen some Twitter threads from performers who spoke about some of their experiences with Ryan. What's odd is that his wife is part of the business too and she has to be complicit in letting her husband prey on these young women. And as I said before, agents were implicated too.
It's pretty creepy.
|
02-15-21 09:06am
|
Reply
2247
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Comment
Download limit now?? Ugh...
As for the missing scenes, the recent allegations against the site owner / male talent (Ryan Madison) may have something to do with this. The allegations are he plied models with drugs and alcohol (some of whom were under legal drinking age) and also or because of the drugs and alcohol did things without consent. Internal cumshots being a big one.
To make matters worse, not that this isn't bad enough, the allegations are than many shady agents knew exactly what they were sending the models into and did nothing about it.
Just a hypothesis...
|
02-10-21 01:38pm
|
Reply
2248
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Not a stupid question at all... The CC charge came through as "413Prod.com" While there was some indication on the TF/PF site that this was the 'biller' there was other information that said the biller was either NETBilling, Epoch or CCBill. The 413Prod site isn't exactly helpful either. This is the full extent of the entire site:
Hello. This is 413's Customer Service web page.
We are here to assist you. Our customer service staff is happy to answer any questions or resolve any problems. We want to service you the best way possible.
If you have a charge from our company (413prod.com or 413pro) on your credit card statement and wish to inquire or if you tried to reach us by phone and were unsuccessful (see business hours below), please e-mail us at:
support@413prod.com - We will respond within 48hrs.
If you are having any technical difficulty with any of our websites, please e-mail us at:
webmaster@413prod.com - We will respond within 48hrs.
Thank you.
Our business hours are:
Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.
Within United States call us toll free at 866-413-3222
Outside the US, call us at 714-997-3850
I have to confess to being very concerned at this point since I'd never heard of 413Prod and I was worried that cancelling may be almost impossible. It turned out okay though. But... what I'm still annoyed at is that TF/PF lists their billers as NETBilling, Epoch or CCBill when they don't appear to use those services. That and the 413Prod links on the TF/PF page are dead. All of that indicated a real 'uh oh' moment for me.
But it looks like everything turned out okay. I'll keep an eye for odd charges for the next while though.
|
04-11-19 03:59pm
|
Comment
2249
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
|
04-11-19 04:30am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2250
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree with you and I've certainly re-reviewed many sites when they've changed (for better or worse) or my opinion of them has changed over time. I am definitely not against re-reviews.
I think part of my dry spell is actually a positive thing. I recently went through my collection and deleted stuff I'm not interested in or have never watched. This still leaves me with a collection probably somewhere around 15-18TB. So I've partly been exercising some self-restraint and have vowed to spend some time browsing through some of the dustier corners of my collection rather than always be looking for the next big thing. I'm actually enjoying myself quite a bit doing this. I've been watching a lot of my favourites from the mid-1990s and into the 2000s. The video quality is terrible by today's standards but I'm having a great time watching some of my favourite scenes from all those years ago.
And I'm not worried... I know the desire to load up on active subscriptions will come roaring back soon!
|
03-20-19 02:54pm
|
