Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1326-1350 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1326
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review

Your review reminds me that I really need to rejoin this site. It's been too long since I've been a member here.

04-24-19  05:33pm

Reply
1327
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

I haven't joined Dog Fart in several years and I can't come up with a good reason why I haven't since every time I join I'm really pleased with the membership and the porn they have to offer. Based on your review I think I'll plan to rejoin soon.

05-09-17  03:41pm

Reply
1328
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment

I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.

12-08-12  08:29pm

Reply
1329
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of joekramer08's Reply

It really isn't my kind of network - or so I thought. I joined for one of the niche sites (Wife Writing) and was really impressed with the rest of the network. I'd recommend joining at least once.

08-13-12  05:20pm

Reply
1330
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks for your kind words, graymane. I hope that some PU members might find this useful in making a decision to join or not.

08-13-12  05:19pm

Review
1331
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large network
- 21 sites (including a relatively new BTS site)
- All interracial
- Some unusual niches
- Older scenes are being remastered
- Easy to use network
- Supports download managers (IDM)
- Easy access to download and viewing options
- Streaming is available
Cons: - Not all sites are updating
- Older remastered scenes may be dated and posted as a new update
- No effective search function
- No (that I could find) high-res or HD scenes
- More expensive than comparable sites
Bottom Line: Dog Fart Network (DFN) isnt a network that Id normally have joined, but Im glad I did. I joined specifically to access one of their unique sites but I found many of the other sites quite good too.

DFN has 21 sites that cover a wide range of niches. The overall theme that runs through the network is interracial sex, specifically black men with white women. One site does feature white men and black women. The sites range from fairly standard porn, straight b/g, b/b/g, anal, etc., legal teen oriented sites, cougar sites, through sites that feature glory holes, and a couple of sites with some unique themes Wife Writing and The Minion. Both of these are unique sites.

The network is simple in layout and operation: the homepage shows all 21 sites. You enter each site through that link and all the sites share the same simple layout: five scenes are listed per page and there is easy access to all the pages. One thing I particularly like about the sites is that on each page, beneath a large thumbnail of each scene, all the viewing and downloading options are available. So many other sites require the users to click through several pages before getting to the download or viewing links; DFNs choice to keep it simple is appreciated.

Speaking of the downloading and viewing options, DFN has more than most other sites. While only two formats are offered (WMV and MP4) those are usually offered in more than one size. I download WMVs and those are offered in two sizes both come in at 640x480 with the only difference being that the larger ones are 4500kb/s versus the smaller ones at 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Some of the older videos are a lower resolution. Oddly, for 2012, the site still allows users to download the videos in segments. While Im sure that few people still need to do this, Im sure that those who do appreciate this option.

While the resolutions are somewhat below standards, they still look crisp.

Streaming is also available in two resolutions that appear to be similar to the WMV downloads.

Speaking of older videos, DFN appears to be moving to remaster a lot of their older scenes. This is both good and bad, depending on how you look at it. The bad is that they seem to use the remastered videos as updates rather than posting new videos as often. I dont hold the opinion that this is necessarily bad because it gives access to fairly decent quality videos of stars from the past decade. I consider that to be good.

The site also offers photos, and like the videos there are several options. Interestingly, the options are for good resolution photos (1067x1600) taken during the video shoot, lower resolution screencaps and these things they call panels which are photos that contain four smaller photos. The higher resolution photos are available as zips but the other two sets are singles only.

The site supports download managers. I use Internet Download Manager and had no problem with links dying on me over a period of over an hour.

One glaring problem with the network is the lack of an effective search function or the use of tags. There is a search function, but it has serious flaws. It allows you to search for a word or words in the title or description of the scene but that can be a rather blunt tool. For example, I searched the term anal and got a number of hits but many of the scenes had no anal sex in them. The site producers frequently refer to a womans birth canal in the scene descriptions and that phrase was captured in a search for anal scenes. This could be solved by a smarter search engine, but it would probably be better solved by tagging scenes with niches.

Any potential member is obviously going to make their own decision on value, but in DFNs case some people may jump to a conclusion based solely on price. The issue is that DFN charges $35 per month, which is more than most comparable sites. Is it worth $35? My opinion is that it is. I think weve become accustomed to lower prices but the market has changed and we all may need to rethink the value equation. In this case, you get access to over a thousand exclusive scenes with decent production values and fast downloads (with no obvious limits, I might add). I think thats good value. (As an aside, Im not sure where the upper limit on pricing is, but I note that last week TBP posted a review of a BDSM site, Infernal Restraints, that commands $65 per month. Im a BDSM fan, but that seems a bit steep.)

One potential concern that has been expressed before is that several of the sites do not appear to be actively updating with new material. Im fine with this as long as the network is updating and the remastering continues.

The bottom line is that I certainly recommend DFN. Its top-quality porn, and specifically interracial porn, with top porn stars thats well produced and easy to access at a fair price.

08-12-12  01:42pm

Replies (4)
Reply
1332
Visit Dom The Nation

Dom The Nation
(0)
Reply of DrMercies's Reply

Thanks for your comments and clarifications.

I must have missed the bit of vaginal sex, but you can count me as one of the members who prefers anal here. The scenes lend themselves to it.

I will say that as much as I like Dom the Nation, and I like it a lot as should be evident in the review, Assylum is definitely still my favourite. But as someone who likes both BDSM and scenes filmed outdoors, Dom the Nation can't be beaten.


02-05-22  11:21am

Review
1333
Visit Dom The Nation

Dom The Nation
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Creative, innovative site
- Beautiful models
- Extreme BDSM
- Outdoor settings
- 25 scenes and growing
- Updates with at least one scene per month
- ‘Clips’ and photos too
- Downloads and streaming
- Multiple resolutions for downloads
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Slower than average download speeds
- 4K files cost extra
Bottom Line: Dom the Nation (DtN) is a relatively new site by the creative minds behind Assylum and Slave Mouth. If you aren’t familiar with either of those older sites, I recommend checking them out and reading the reviews. Those sites are two of the most unique and creative BDSM sites I’ve ever seen. In terms of creativity, I’ve not seen anyone else come close. DtN is every bit as good as it’s sister sites but adds creativity.

What differentiates DtN is the setting for the scenes. Where both Assylum and Slave Mouth are shot indoors, DtN scenes are shot outdoors. Some of the elements that the two original sites are known for, namely bondage, extreme S&M, rough anal sex (there is no vaginal penetration here at all), face-fucking, watersports, degradation, humiliation and general depravity are all present here, but in outdoor settings. For me, shooting scenes outdoors adds a whole new element to these already-unique scenes. It adds an element of risk that, for me, heightens the allure.

Instead of using creative devices to bind and restrain the models, in most instances they are bound on bare ground including dirt, gravel and even jagged rocks. Sometimes softer surfaces such as grass are used.

Most of the scenes have been shot in the US though the crew recently did go to Italy and some of the scenes shot there are now making their way onto the site. Unlike the sister site, there is no unifying premise here. Here, it simply bondage and sadism for the sake of that alone. The site labels itself as having BDSM “documentaries” and that is an apt description.

This site began in earnest in early 2020, just before the pandemic hit. Lockdowns hindered site growth but they are back to shooting and uploading. There are currently 25 scenes uploaded. Here, a scene is called a movie and tends to be 40 minutes on average. There are also currently eight “clips.” These are shorter, more focused videos where there may just be oral sex or some specific act or bondage. Blended in among all of these are seven photo sets.

The site has made the unusual decision to not have any means to separate the videos, clips or photos. There are simply six thumbnails per screen and a description below that outlines what the file is. I suspect that not being able to filter for just videos, for example, is a creative choice because it is obvious that the site is trying to create a flow. While there isn’t necessarily a story behind these videos and clips, they do tend to flow together. And, even if you don’t want to view the photos, they are very easily skipped over.

The models who appear on the site are generally mainstream, though models who also are known for some extreme acts. Models such as Charlotte Sartre, Lydia Black and Rebel Rhyder all have scenes here. But there are also models that I don’t normally associate with BDSM who have scenes here. Those would include Rory Knox, Brooke Johnson and Claire Roos. Regardless of the model, they all give over-the-top BDSM performances. Many of the scenes feature multiple models in the same shoot. In some cases, all of the models are being subjected to BDSM and in other cases one of the subs is assisting the Dom.

For the basic subscription price you get access to stream or download files at 480p, 720p, and 1080p. 4K videos are available but require a premium membership. A note if you are streaming: the scenes default to the trailer so make sure to select the full scene.

An ongoing minor complaint that I have had with the two older sister-sites is that download speeds are much slower than I’m used to seeing on other sites. Unfortunately, that continues here. I suspect that since all these sites are related that they are all run off the same servers. This is simply a minor concern, however, because while the speeds are slower, I’ve never had a problem with the downloads timing out or crashing.

One other minor negative for me, though it may not be an issue for everyone, is that many of the scenes are shot over several hours and some extend into the night. While the lighting can make up for some of that, my preference would be for scenes shot entirely in the daylight.

DtN is certainly not a site for the faint of heart. Make no mistake, this is not a playful, vanilla BDSM site. This is a site where the BDSM is degrading and, in many cases, likely quite painful. If, however, you like what Assylum or Slave Mouth offers, then I strongly encourage you to look at DtN. Moving the scenes into a less controlled outdoor environment really adds an illicit element to them. If you do like extreme BDSM, you owe it to yourself to take a look at the trailers here. But, as with my conclusions regarding the sister-sites, DtN is class-leading but most definitely not mainstream porn.

02-03-22  09:31am

Replies (2)
Reply
1334
Visit DOMAI

DOMAI
(0)
Reply of LadyLover's Review

Excellent review. Welcome to PornUsers. I think you'll find that this is a great community of friendly and mostly like-minded serious porn collectors. I look forward to reading more of your reviews in the future.

03-18-17  12:36pm

Reply
1335
Visit Dominated Girls

Dominated Girls
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Thanks for the comments Jay.

03-10-13  02:46pm

Reply
1336
Visit Dominated Girls

Dominated Girls
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

I agree 100% that interviews at the end are better, but the reason I prefer them there is I like to hear the model's perspective on the actual scene rather than hear about her theoretical likes and dislikes beforehand.

I'm okay with how they do the bondage and torment, but like you, I do wish they'd build in more humiliation and public scenes.

Thanks for the comments! It's good to hear from another BDSM fan.


03-05-13  01:40pm

Review
1337
Visit Dominated Girls

Dominated Girls
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the 21 Sextreme Network
- 250 scenes
- Updates regularly
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Many file choices
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line: This site is part of the 21 Sextreme network that includes this and 13 other sites. The network is sold as the more extreme side of the 21 Sextury network. Im a new fan of the 21 S1Sextury / 21 Sextreme networks and a long-time fan of good BDSM so I was definitely interested to see if this site met the standards set by many others in the two networks and how it compared to some of the better BDSM sites.

First a bit of a caveat: even if you are a fan of BDSM material you have to admit that it can sometimes get repetitive: girls in bondage can only have so many variations. The same can be said for a lot of other niches too, like massage and old-and-young. This site suffers from a bit of that as well, but Im still glad I joined and still happy to have a lot of the scenes.

The site currently has 250 scenes and four new ones are added each month, though not necessarily on a weekly cycle.

One common element of most of the scenes is the same as with the other sites on this and the related network: the models are some of the most beautiful on the internet. For me, this increases my interest in the site since many of the models here arent true fetish models.

The scenes share some other traits too: they all have the models in several different bondage set-ups (almost exclusively using rope), most have some other implements used, like ball gags, clamps or wax, and in most of the scenes there is actually sex, usually while the model is in bondage. This latter point isnt unique to this site, but it isnt available on every BDSM site. I suspect that legal concerns mean some sites just dont take that risk. As a guy who likes watching anal scenes, there are some here but they arent in the majority.

One thing that is a bit of a negative for some (and others have commented on the same thing on other BDSM sites) but a probably a legal necessity is an interview at either the beginning or the end of the scene where the model breaks the fourth wall and talks about what is about to happen or what just happened. As much as some people dont like it I accept that given the extreme nature of a BDSM scene that is it probably necessary to keep the soccer-moms away. Personally, I find the interviews interesting and usually watch them.

The site is laid out in the same way as every other site on this and the related network, which is to say that it is simple but effective. There are some improvements coming with the addition of a large number of tags for sorting the scenes. This feature is visible now but not active so I cant comment on it. If it works as planned though, it will be a great sorting tool.

Each page displays 36 large thumbnails showing the female model in the scene. Rolling your mouse over the thumbnail brings up so data on the scene, including model name and the date it was uploaded.

Clicking a scenes thumbnail opens a new page where you have options to stream and download the scene. Immediately apparent is that there is an option to download just clips, but there is an option in all cases to download one full file. A trailer is also available. Streaming is available too, but I chose downloads.

There is a big difference in scenes uploaded before October 2009 and those uploaded after that. Prior to that date there were few options for downloads. In most cases those limited choices were a low-res H.264 file and a medium and high-res in WMV. Depending on when the scene was uploaded though, the high-res WMV is excellent. After October 2009 more options were made available, with three resolutions being offered in both H.264 and WMV. I found the mid-range H.264 to be the best compromise between quality and file size so I opted for that in most downloads. Those come in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on a 23 monitor. (In the interests of clarity, there are approximately 170 scenes that have been uploaded since more options were offered.)

Download managers work well and I experienced no time-outs. Download speeds were better than Im used to with similar sites.

Photos are also available and even though the site is really more of a video site the photos are well done and available in good resolutions. The lowest resolution I saw was 1280x853. Newer uploads offer that and 3504x2336. Zips are available.

The site has no real flaws: it has some great scenes with high production values and stunning models in a simple to use layout that allows download managers. What more could a BDSM fan ask for? I think that this site offers BDSM that is on par with the best out there, like the Kink sites and Society SM.

The bottom line is that if youre a fan of good BDSM porn you wont be disappointed by this site. The fact that it is part of a network and also comes with a TBP / PU discount makes this a great deal.

03-05-13  03:30am

Replies (4)
Reply
1338
Visit Double Teamed Teens

Double Teamed Teens
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Review

I've not seen this network before so I looked at it after reading your review. It has a lot of teen and anal themed sites (and some teen anal theme sites) so I'm definitely interested, but I don't think I could do it based on the concerns that you report.

Thanks for the review.


03-16-11  05:53pm

Reply
1339
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Graymane, I say this to you as a former Roman Catholic and one who studied to be a priest. The Catholic Church has the doctrine of Purgatory where an otherwise holy person gets sent to be purified before being allowed into Heaven. For the purposes of humor only, I'll deem that you may need a little while in Purgatory and I wonder if your punishment is having to watch anal sex for a few years before being allowed to enter the fullness of Heaven? If it is, please, please, please tell them that I too hated anal sex. And I hated Taylor Rain and Tanner Mayes especially. And the most fitting punishment for me would be a requirement to watch these women have anal sex.

Trust me, when we meet in Heaven, I'll buy you a drink!


05-16-14  02:12pm

Reply
1340
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Great story sir!

It reminds me of a joke I only partially remember so I won't dwell on it, but the gist of it is that a man dies and goes into the great beyond where things are better beyond all imagining. It's like a harem of beautiful women who look after all his sexual needs and submit to every depraved wish. He finally asks someone what he had done to earn such a high place in heaven. The reply was 'Heaven? You're not in Heaven! This is hell for all these women who did bad things on earth!"


05-15-14  05:21pm

Reply
1341
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Give it some time, young man! You'll come around! ;-)

05-14-14  01:59pm

Reply
1342
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of jook's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Sorry to answer your question with another question, but is it really possible to have too much porn featuring petite and gorgeous EE and Russian women doing anal? ;-)

Two of the bonus sites are pretty good. The biggest site on the network in First Anal Quest and that's pretty much self-explanatory. It has the same pros and cons of Double View Casting and it is fairly large too with 259 scenes available. (But it doesn't have the double-view camera gimmick.)

I also liked Fuck n Drive though it is fairly small. I like the whole cars-and-girls thing (I think it comes from my love of public sex porn). There are 38 scenes with a mix of solo, girl-girl and boy-girl. There is some anal here but not much. Since this is a favorite niche of mine I'm planning a full review in case anyone else shares my interest in it.

There's also Jizz on Teens. That site has 24 scenes and I can't really say anything else about it because I didn't download from it. For one thing all the scenes are b/g/g and I really prefer b/g. Also, none of the model's names are listed and that's something that bugs me.

The final site in the network is Wanted GFs. This is the weakest site on the network. It's touted as an amateur site and seems to have a lot more pictures than videos. And many of the photo sets I saw were of the American porn star Alyssa Hall. I quite like Ms. Hall, but she's no amateur girlfriend! The pic sets are available as zips.

Billing was through Epoch so I had no problems getting the membership or cancelling it.

I hope this helps.


05-13-14  02:08pm

Review
1343
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 93 scenes
- Russian / Eastern European models
- Several download options
- Innovative gimmick to have two views available
- In streaming you can switch between two cameras
- Two separate videos available for download
- Lots of anal
- Part of a small network (5 sites in total)
Cons: - Slow downloads
- Models names are frequently mixed up
- The male shooting POV needs more practice
- Selecting the remember me button on log in doesnt work
- Hasnt updated since February 2014
- The two views are slightly out of sync
Bottom Line: Im a fan of the casting niche and this was one of the few remaining reputable-looking sites that I hadnt joined. Im glad I did but if youre a fan of this niche this is likely one of the weakest sites available in the genre.

To be fair to the site, I think that part of the problem is a language barrier in many of the scenes. Not many of the models speak English well, if at all, and the casting niche relies on a lot of conversation to set the scene up and create some heat. In this case that heat isnt developed well because of the language barrier. Of more importance though is the fact that the site puts less effort into creating the myth of a casting video. When comparing the scenes here to one of the best, Casting Couch X, for example, language is only part of the issue. A site like CCX puts a lot of effort into creating the feel of a real casting that turns into a porn tryout. DVC doesnt put that effort in.

The sites main claim is that it offers a double view of all the scenes. There is a camera being operated by a cameraman and the male talent has a handheld camera that shoots the same scene at the same time in POV. If you use streaming the video plays within the site and there is a narrow band at the top where you have a picture-in-picture of the second camera. Hitting your space bar toggles between the two views. I dont normally stream but I can see that this might be a good feature for those who do stream. But it might also be an answer to a question that no one ever asked. Ill let you be the judge of that. A minor glitch is that the two views are slightly out of sync only by a second or so but enough to notice. The bigger problem lies with the quality of the POV camerawork. I understand that it must be hard to do, but others have mastered the skill and the male talent/POV cameraman here hasnt.

The models are all Eastern European or Russian and many of them are well-known in the industry. Theyre all between 18 and 22 and all are petite and attractive. There arent a lot of fake breasts and tattoos. (Maybe those trends arent as popular in EE/Russia?) One issue with all sites that use EE/Russian models is that they seem to change their names on a weekly basis. Its apparent here because the link to the scene will have one name and then when you watch the scene there is text of the model name and that is often different from what is listed on the site.

The site uses a simple layout with 15 medium-sized thumbnails per page that open into a page for the scene. There is no search function and I found that using the model search page didnt work well but that may be due to the frequent model name changes even within the site.

There are some download options though they are limited and I dont really understand why these are offered. The scenes are available in Windows, Apple and Android but in some cases all of them are MP4. There is only one file resolution in each type. Older videos have WMV available, sometimes as the only option. For each scene there are two downloads available: the main camera and the POV camera. One significant flaw in downloading is that the download speeds are about one-third of what I usually get. I used a download manager and had no problems with that.

Regardless of what file type is offered they all come in at 1280x720 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look crisp and have no pixilation issues.

The site shows 93 scenes but the oldest four arent available for streaming. I cant say for certain that the site is now dead, but it used to update by adding one scene per month but the last upload was in February 2014.

The site is part of a small network of five sites in total. (One of them, Wanted GFs, isnt worth joining for so avoid a membership if thats all you want.)

One thing that I listed as a good thing though others will disagree and see it as a negative is that there are a lot of anal scenes on the site. I didnt count them, but Id say between two-thirds and three-quarters of the scenes have anal.

One minor glitch that was nevertheless annoying is that while the login page had a box to check to remember your username and password that didnt work. Also, I couldnt enter the other sites on the network through the links on the site. My username and password werent recognized. I had to do a Google search for the site and enter that way.

The bottom line is that unless you absolutely have to have all the casting scenes you can get your hands on, or if you really want to collect all the scenes you can from a specific model than its probably best to pass on this site. Its well done, the videos look good and they have their double-view gimmick, but other than that the site is just an average porn site that doesnt stand out from the crowd.

05-11-14  07:55am

Replies (9)
Reply
1344
Visit Download Pass

Download Pass
(0)
Reply of MiztaBlu's Review

Thanks for the review. I'm always on the look out for sites like this and I've never heard of this one before. Now based on your review I can avoid this and continue looking elsewhere. (And for me, sound and video not being in sync is definitely a killer. That REALLY annoys me!)

03-23-12  04:14pm

Reply
1345
Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly
(0)
Reply of The Collector's Reply

I'll look forward to it, but based on your comments and the recent review I'm unlikely to join. It doesn't sound like the site is very user-friendly.

07-06-11  04:00pm

Reply
1346
Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly
(0)
Reply of The Collector's Comment

I'd certainly be interested in seeing a new review. I realize that you use Site Grabber, so if you do a full review please be sure to let us know if the picture files are now zipped. Previous reviews have reported that they aren't. That would be a deal breaker for me, and many other too, I think.

07-06-11  03:53am

Review
1347
Visit Driver XXX

Driver XXX
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Nubiles.net group
- A-list models
- Many download options
- Supports download managers
- Rare niche
Cons: - Small site
- Updates irregularly
Bottom Line: Im a big fan of car-themed porn so when I saw this site listed at TBP I signed up. I didnt realize that it was bundled with Nubiles.net at the time I subscribed but that worked out well because this site is quite small so having access to Nubiles made the membership worth it.

The main theme of the site turned out to be a little different than I had expected. I like watching road-head scenes and I expected that here but didnt get that. While most of the scenes take place in cars they mostly occur in the back seat when the car is parked. Some of the scenes have the model outside leaning up against the car.

The site is quite small and wouldnt be a good value if it wasnt bundled with a bigger site. There are currently only 11 videos available. To make things worse, the last update was three weeks ago. It appears that it is in an update cycle that feeds into Nubiles-Porn, the Nubiles site where they separate out all of their hardcore scenes for those of us who prefer those.

While the site is currently quite small it is fair to say that the porn on offer is very high quality. The models are the biggest A-list girls working but its important to note that since this site is affiliated with Nubiles that you can only expect models who fit into that category. The models are all young (18-20) and petite.

As with other Nubiles sites, there are many download options. There are five MP4 choices (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and a lone WMV offering at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and they look great. If you normally download the highest resolution available you may want to check the 1280x720 first because they look really good.

Pictures are also available and aren't just an afterthought. The photos can be downloaded as singles or as zips. There are three resolutions available for the zips: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800

Apart from the small size and irregular updates there aren't any serious problems with the site. One minor quibble I have with a couple of the scenes is that they end to reveal that the girl has been tricked and used for sex. I find that adds nothing to the scene. It reminds me of early Captain Stabbin videos where the scene closed with the girl going for a swim, being tossed a life ring and then the boat sailing away. Only two of the scenes here use that closing and I hope that future scenes avoid it.

Id recommend the site but suggest that if youre interested in a membership you consider that what youre buying is access to the Nubiles.net network and youll also happen to get access to this site with a fairly rare niche.

06-08-15  01:59pm

Replies (0)
Review
1348
Visit Drone Hunter

Drone Hunter
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnt updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnt added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnt know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the drone hunter to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnt updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that its part of the Mofos network so youll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnt add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24 monitor and a 50 TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnt have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I cant say that Id recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because its just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.

08-10-15  11:10am

Replies (0)
Reply
1349
Visit Dungeon Sex

Dungeon Sex
(0)
Reply of marcdc1's Review

Great review! Thanks for adding it. Kink always seems to be the Gold Standard for any BDSM niche and this site is no different. I'm really glad that they now offer one price for all-site access.

And others may not agree, but I appreciate you adding "anal in almost every scene" as a pro!


03-25-17  06:04pm

Reply
1350
Visit Dyked

Dyked
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I've heard horror stories of people who've put some time into writing a review and then lost it if the site crashed. I'm guessing that a lot of regulars here use some form of what we use.

05-10-17  05:35pm


Shown : 1326-1350 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.98 seconds.