| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2501
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
jayson12's Comment
All of us have had to enter home addresses every time we join a site. Like tangub said above, the site doesn't get the address so there is no reason to worry about getting porn stuff in the mail. Also, they have your email address and that costs almost nothing for them to send you offers while an actual mailing would be pretty expensive. Just make sure to set up a separate email account because you will get spammed there.
|
11-14-11 03:53am
|
Reply
2502
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review! I joined using the Halloween special they had and I'm impressed too. I'd never heard of Viv Thomas, probably because I don't collect a lot of European porn, but this is a seriously good site. I agree that the site is big enough that it needs better navigation.
|
11-13-11 05:18pm
|
Reply
2503
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I'll look forward to seeing how you like the sites. I'd never heard of them before a few months ago, but now they're definitely in my top three favourites and might even be number one. The Diesel team know how to make some excellent porn.
|
11-13-11 03:09pm
|
Reply
2504
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I checked the terms of the contract and they do spell out that there is a daily limit, and it is a bit confusing in that there is a limit of 10GB. I'm not really sure how to interpret the part where you can additionally download 15 big movies.
Here's the exact clause in the contract:
E. Download Limit
As a member in good standing, you may download up to 10 gigabytes of data each day, and additionally up to 15 big movies. Upon reaching this limit, you may be denied access to download any additional data until the beginning of the next day.
|
11-13-11 09:15am
|
Reply
2505
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Review
This looks like a great site. The sample photos are excellent quality. I don't see any hints that there are boy/girl hardcore scenes here. Are there any? If so, are there any anal scenes?
|
11-13-11 08:57am
|
Reply
2506
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I had been a members there many years ago and the network is on my list of sites to join, but I might have to rethink that based on your experience.
|
11-13-11 08:54am
|
Reply
2507
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I can understand why a site might want to impose a download limit - obviously a member with a high-speed connection can download a lot of stuff in a day. But... I'm with you when it comes to hating them. For me, I'd think twice about joining a site that imposed a limit - especially one like RK where the limit doesn't seem logical.
Thanks for the warning on this.
|
11-12-11 05:56am
|
Reply
2508
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
Great review. I'm with you on the site being a bit bland. My take is that they take quantity over quality. But they're still probably the best DVD site on the net.
|
11-12-11 05:53am
|
Reply
2509
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
All on externals for me too. What I have now would fill thousands of DVDs I suspect, so storing and cataloguing them would be a nightmare.
|
11-12-11 05:50am
|
Reply
2510
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I vote fully dressed, but that doesn't mean PVC, vinyl or leather stripper outfits with thigh-high boots. (Though a few scenes that way are fine.) My preference is for street clothes: jeans, shorts, skirts, etc.
|
11-10-11 04:02am
|
Reply
2511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Now that's funny! Thanks for the laugh! You, sir, have the makings of a modern porn director.
|
11-10-11 04:00am
|
Reply
2512
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks again pat. Just so we don't get too far off the topic of this poll I'm going to start a thread on the forum. I'd appreciate any info you can supply there.
Thanks!
|
11-09-11 11:40am
|
Reply
2513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nickydubya's Reply
You can't go wrong quoting the Simpsons!
|
11-09-11 11:39am
|
Reply
2514
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks pat. I can't check it out right now as I'm in a hotel with a poor internet connection, but as soon as I can I'll be checking that out.
You've hinted that this stuff is bad quality. What's the issue with it?
|
11-08-11 06:28pm
|
Reply
2515
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm not familiar with porno dan, but I'll have to have a look anyway! I've heard rumours of an anal scene, but I figured it wasn't mainstream since it or they weren't listed on IAFD.
|
11-08-11 09:11am
|
Reply
2516
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I haven't been a member here for maybe five or more years and I can't really explain why. Of the stuff I bought at that time, Nubiles gets viewed very regularly as so many of the models are really beautiful. I think I'll have to head back for another membership soon.
|
11-08-11 04:14am
|
Reply
2517
|
Casting Couch Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Great review of what looks like a great site even with the shortcomings you pointed out. I suspect I'll give it some consideration, but for now I probably won't join thanks to two simple words in your review: "no anal." Thanks for that detail. I'm sure I'm not the only member here who like to see at least some anal on a large site.
|
11-08-11 04:11am
|
Reply
2518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If the fates deemed it so, then who would I be to argue with them? ;-) I'd be like Grampa Simpson when he came in to some money: "Now I can afford that crazy stripper wife!"
Hmmmm... maybe Tanner Mayes would finally do anal...
|
11-08-11 04:08am
|
Reply
2519
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think previous comments have summed it up well, but I'll add my thoughts anyway...
Solo and POV, yes. Lesbian and hardcore, no.
|
11-06-11 02:29pm
|
Reply
2520
|
Mary Alicia
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I'm mixed on it. I don't like it because I'd like to see it, but it does add to her allure. I suspect that for straight versus gay porn it might be different though since vaginas are pretty much all alike whereas penises are quite differnt from guy to guy. A solo female model could do this, but I doubt a solo male model could get away with it.
|
11-05-11 06:23pm
|
Reply
2521
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
"Other" for me too. In my case that means 'nothing.'
|
11-05-11 09:03am
|
Reply
2522
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.
It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.
I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.
|
11-05-11 09:00am
|
Reply
2523
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
All indications are that the confusing membership is gone. I realize that there is still a risk, but I think I'm willing to take that risk now. Thanks for the info.
Oops... I should have read the post above from the webmaster. I guess that settles it!
|
11-05-11 08:40am
|
Reply
2524
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
That's another great one. That whole scene is great.
|
11-05-11 08:38am
|
Reply
2525
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I agree with you. Most times I skip those. My guess is that the reason for these interviews is 75% law and 25% because Kink does try to be a better network than most. They seem really woman-friendly and want to promote that. I know the average woman would think I was insane for saying that, but it really is woman-friendly. These site are all about showing women with certain fetishes getting off on those fetishes. I do like some of the post-scene interviews where the model sits there and talks about what she liked about the scene. That could suffice for compliance I suspect.
Other BDSM sites don't use the interview as much, if at all. Society SM comes to mind.
|
11-03-11 07:38am
|
