| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2476
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Thanks for this Ken! I'll be checking it out for sure. Finally one good reason to be snowed in.
|
11-23-11 10:46am
|
Reply
2477
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
When I can't see everything that a site has to offer it usually makes me suspicious. What do they have to hide? And for me, it is often finding a few stars or scenes that I've been looking for that will tip the balance to me joining. I really hate it when a site (especially a large one) has a couple of generic tour pages and then drops you at a join page. I suspect sites like Videobox wouldn't be so successful if they had a tour page that told a prosepctive member that they had thousands of DVDs and then expect you to join on that alone. What harm can full access to see a site do?
|
11-23-11 06:02am
|
Reply
2478
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Piper's Reply
A soft sensual blowjob is definitely the opposite of Facial Abuse. I like the look of your site and will definitely consider joining.
|
11-22-11 01:08pm
|
Reply
2479
|
The Art Of Blow Job
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
This looks like a really interesting and unique site. Thanks for reviewing it. I might consider this as an antidote to some of the 'extreme' blowjob sites on the internet like Facial Abuse. It looks like this site and Facial Abuse are at opposite ends of the BJ video spectrum.
|
11-22-11 03:58am
|
Reply
2480
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I encounter it so rarely that it isn't a big deal for me.
|
11-22-11 03:54am
|
Reply
2481
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Good news on the updating pricing. I agree that a better preview would be a good idea, but at the discounted price you really can't go wrong. I figured all I really wanted was access to one site so the rest woudl be gravy.
|
11-21-11 06:11pm
|
Reply
2482
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
ashjwilliams's Comment
I've joined Evil Angel sites several times and I'm planning another membership soon and I've never had a problem. I think most others here would agree with me that you need to set up a separate porn email account (Hotmail or Gmail) because you WILL get spam from someone. At least if the spam is in one email that no prying eyes can see it can't do you any harm.
BTW, I should add that Milk Enema is a great site and if you join it and like it that will make two of us here who like girl/girl milk enemas. I need the support!
|
11-21-11 04:37pm
|
Reply
2483
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Anonymous64's Review
I had thought of joining this site a while back but I recall that it was streaming only at that time. I'm glad to see that they now offer downloads.
Please let us know if you have any suspicious charges show up. If you don't I'll definitely consider signing up.
What are your thoughts on some of the additional sites in the network?
|
11-20-11 05:20pm
|
Reply
2484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Good points about the issues that male talent might face, messmer. I can imagine sometimes it would be difficult to perform with a bunch of people watching you. And the opposite, which you mention, is the possibility of having the guy finish early.
One good thing if I was ever invited to star in a porn scene with the likes of Tanner Mayes or Amia Moretti is that it would be mercifully short for the viewers.
|
11-20-11 05:15pm
|
Reply
2485
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Amen to that!
|
11-20-11 01:11pm
|
Reply
2486
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I watch a lot of the BTS material and it seems that most are fine with the work they do. I can't imagine that the sex is all that enjoyable though.
|
11-20-11 09:10am
|
Reply
2487
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'll look forward to reading them and seeing your opinion. I suspect from your comments that you're as impressed as I am. This collection of sites is definitely in my top three favourites of all time. But prospective members should be warned: generic porn will be pretty bland after you spend some time with Diesel Access!
|
11-20-11 06:40am
|
Reply
2488
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I hate to hear this because there is some material I really want to see here. I literally was on the join page a couple of days ago and thought twice about it. I'll probably join, and I hope I'm not as frustrated as you. Thanks for all the warnings. At least if I do join I'll go in fully informed.
|
11-20-11 06:37am
|
Reply
2489
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I can understand your frustration. It's bad enough having a download limit, but to have one that a member can't figure out is worse. Then having your membership cancelled on top of that is bizarre.
|
11-20-11 06:35am
|
Reply
2490
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I agree 100%. The site should be tagged as lesbian because that's a strong part of it and they do it really well. It reminds me of when I was pleasantly surprised to find so much public flashing and exhibitionism on FTV Girls.
So let it be known through these comments: if you like lesbain material, you need to seriously consider a membership to Viv Thomas.
|
11-20-11 06:33am
|
Reply
2491
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Nick:
Thanks for providing this information. I've noticed the same thing on other sites so now I won't complain so much when I can't get wmvs in HD. I don't have much technical knowledge and hadn't thought of compression issues.
|
11-20-11 06:30am
|
Reply
2492
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Nick:
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I really enjoyed your site and I hope I made it clear in my review that of the few things I didn't like all but one was purely subjective. Even my issue with navigation probably isn't an issue for members who know the models. The fact is that I probably wouldn't have seen it as much of a concern if I knew the models. I hope that's clear to prospective members.
I must be confused about the Desire Moore thing... Middle-age is creeping in. That's my excuse and I apologize for the error.
As I said in my review though, one thing that I found amazing on your site were the 'banned' videos. Thanks for posting those. I like your site and would definitely recommend it (actually, I already did to a porn buddy who would really love your site) and for me those fisting videos alone were worth the membership fee!
You have a great site and thanks for offering the discount.
|
11-20-11 06:28am
|
Comment
2493
|
Massive Access
(0)
|
|
11-18-11 06:43am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2494
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Yes. It was pretty rare to see an HD scene in wmv format. I didn't download a lot from this site, but I only managed to get one HD scene in wmv. Most of them are mp4 and it looks like all new HD material is mp4 only.
Maybe tangub can add to this as he's got a membership here too.
|
11-18-11 05:47am
|
Reply
2495
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks Denner. I appreciate your comments.
As for wmv HD, it really looks like they've decided that HD material will be in mp4 only. Those of us who prefer wmv are out of luck.
|
11-18-11 03:58am
|
Reply
2496
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never been into celebrity stuff. The only celebrity stuff I own is the Paris Hilton DVD and the only thing I still watch on that are the bonus scenes with Teagan Presley, Randy Wright, Monica Sweetheart and Taylor Rain.
I regularly chase down obscure scenes with porn stars (finding rare anal scenes, for example) but never with celebrities.
|
11-18-11 03:57am
|
Reply
2497
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks for the comment, cybertoad. I really think this is the weakest review I've done in a long time. I just didn't have any 'connection' with this site. You might have had the same thing where you take a membership without really knowing what you're getting. This is an great site (not excellent) but just not for me.
|
11-17-11 06:26pm
|
Reply
2498
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
bebelover's Reply
I figured that with a name like "In the Crack" there wouid be some anal...
Thanks for the clarification.
|
11-16-11 03:23am
|
Reply
2499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I agree with Jay G and would add that I can't imagine why anyone would be opposed to seeing any body part of an attractive woman.
|
11-16-11 03:22am
|
Reply
2500
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
It’s funny how much alike our reactions to this site are and that the reasons for those reactions are almost identical. Like you, I’m coming off of a Young Legal Porn membership and that membership really changed porn for me. I don’t mean to sound like I’m exaggerating because I’m not. I’ve been buying online porn for a long time and YLP was like a breath of fresh air. (A minor difference for me is that my favourite models are Gloria and Ivana.) I was thinking of joining Videobox again but I just don’t have the desire to join another site with generic porn. Viv Thomas isn’t necessarily generic porn – it’s actually great porn – but it does follow the model of most other mainstream porn. When I write a review I’m going to try to be objective and not subjective. Had I joined Viv Thomas before YLP I’m sure I’d have liked it a lot more. That’s no criticism of Viv Thomas since I suspect that would have happened to any site that followed YLP.
|
11-14-11 04:02am
|
