| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2526
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Excellent review. Thanks for all the information. Sometimes I think I'm the only regular here who has never been a member to this site. The reason I've never joined is the confusing membership. My concern was that I'd sign up for a specific site and find that I need to wait for three months to get it. When it comes to porn, I'm a bit impatient!
But your comment on the membership is the closest I've heard that the old 'structured' membership is gone and replaced with 'you get what you pay for' membership. I think it's probably safe for me to add this to the list now.
|
11-03-11 07:33am
|
Reply
2527
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Failing to use multiple camera angles would make the scene loot too amateur. It'd be like a couple sets up a camera to record themselves in the act. That might make a for an interesting setup once in a long while, but I'll take my porn with higher production values, thanks.
One semi-related issue is camera movement. You gotta edit out the bits where the cameraman is setting up another shot. You aren't filming a remake of NYPD Blue. (Unless you are filming a remake of NYPD Blue, of course...)
|
11-03-11 07:29am
|
Reply
2528
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I shouldn't be surprised that a with a bunch of us with similar interest in porn get together that there are other similarities too. That has to be in my top three favourite episodes. And... you'll remember that's the episode where Dave has one of the best lines ever spoken on TV: "It's like that movie, 'Interracial Hole Stretchers 2. She was white, they were black, but it didn't matter, man, they were in love!"
|
11-02-11 04:58pm
|
Reply
2529
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
But where's Keitha??? (Please, please, please let someone get this reference...)
Great review, BTW. Not my kind of site, but interesting nonetheless.
|
11-01-11 04:00am
|
Reply
2530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a big fan of the genre and thankfully there are several companies out there that do it well. Kink.com has been mentioned, and everyone should be so lucky as to have a porn company do their interests so much justice. The second one is Society SM, which nip at Kink's heels.
I have no idea why I like it, as i have no BDSM tendancies myself. Maybe it's the intensity of a scene so well done. And, I might add, a well done scene is all about the sub female's pleasure. If a woman has those interests, there are probably few places she can look to get that itch scratched.
|
11-01-11 03:58am
|
Reply
2531
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
It does seem odd that a bunch of us are posting positive reviews, and in a way I guess you could argue that I got paid. The points I earned for the week I posted that review earned me the top spot in the raffle for the first time ever.
I suspect that a lot of the interest was started when slutty posted that there was a new site, Skinny Super Girl. (I still think that title doesn't do Gloria justice. It would be better if it were called "Holy-flying-fuck is She Ever Fucking Incredible!") I'd never heard of these sites before then. But like you, tangub, this will be a site I come back to over and over again.
Great review too. I didn't mention that the lack of biographical info on the models was a con for me too. Since many of them don't speak English it would be a good way to learn a bit more about them. I PROMISE I wouldn't stalk Gloria...
|
10-31-11 05:23pm
|
Reply
2532
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I ended up paying about $14CDN which still isn't bad. Maybe the site owners figure that since they give a TBP discount already that there is no need to offer a further discount. But it could just be a technical glitch too.
Oops... I should have read the whole thread of comments since the webmaster replied...
I'm looking forward to spending some time at this site. It isn't my normal kind of site but neither was Young Legal Porn and the related sites and I found those to be among the best I've ever had a membership to.
|
10-31-11 02:00pm
|
Reply
2533
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the update. Based on what you were seeing I logged on to the site directly using my iPad and I was given the discount offer. The offer isn't exactly a 50% discount because it is only offered in Euros so it doesn't convert to half. But a discount is a discount and I appreciate it. I cleared my history on my PC and entered the site directly and there was the offer. So I signed up. These types of sites are not normally what I'm interested in, but most people seem to like it so I'll try it at the discounted price.
All that to say that DO NOT ENTER VIV THOMAS THROUGH TBP/PU or you won't see the discount offer. If you have, clear your history and you should be okay.
I'm not tech-savvy enough to explain what you're experiencing, tangub, but is it possible you haven't clicked off all the possible boxes for clearing your history and some category is remaining behind?
|
10-31-11 08:46am
|
Reply
2534
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
As with the World Cup discount, the link to take advantage of the discount well hidden. I'll keep looking, but for now this seems to be more trick than treat. There is a huge ad for the offer on the main page, but clicking any link to join takes you to the main page where you can join for the $19.95 TBP price or the "Special Visa Offer" of $24.95.
I've tried every obvious way to locate the discount, including the pull-down menus on the join page but I can't find it. And since by the time I get home from work the offer will be gone I can't take advantage of it.
Why make it so difficult??????
|
10-31-11 04:05am
|
Reply
2535
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
I'll add that the 'day' is measured in a European time zone, so you may want to take advantage of this now rather than later today in the North American zone. I lost out on the World Cup offer due to this timing issue.
|
10-31-11 03:57am
|
Reply
2536
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I had a look at BT and you're definitely right. BT seems to be miles ahead of Take 5 with the same style and even some of the same models. I might just pop in and have a longer, paid look.
|
10-31-11 03:56am
|
Reply
2537
|
Take 5 Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I really can't understand why a site in 2011 that is primarily a photo site wouldn't use zips. That really baffles me...
|
10-30-11 11:26am
|
Reply
2538
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Gloria is a goddess!
I have a group of sites that I go back to every few months. These ones are on that list.
When you do join, do that through Young Legal Porn because that site offers the TBP/PU discount. And I STRONGLY recommend paying for the full access. With models like Gloria, Beata and Ivana you'll leave too much material behind by not paying the extra $10. I'll look forward to reading your review.
|
10-30-11 05:51am
|
Reply
2539
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Elephant - as you've read here, the webmaster reported that the file names would change on a go-forward basis to include the model name. That's in effect now. The updates I've downloaded in the past week now all have the model name.
And I definitely agree that it's a big plas to know that the site owners/staff listen to customer input. That support converted me from an unsatisfied customer to a very satisfied customer who'll encourage anyone to get a membership. These really are amazing sites!
|
10-30-11 05:12am
|
Reply
2540
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I'm sure it can happen, but since this seems to be an 'invention' of the late 1990s and early 2000s I suspect that most of what we see is fake. These must be heady days for guys who like to see female on male golden showers.
|
10-29-11 04:19am
|
Reply
2541
|
Ghetto Swarm
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Reply
As with your comment that Jerkoff Zone is a 199os site with limited updates, your comment here that you can get better for free really hits the mark. 100% accurate.
|
10-29-11 04:17am
|
Reply
2542
|
Jerkoff Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Reply
I'm really convinced that they use this as a way to encourage you to buy better quality stuff from VOD sites. That way they con you out of money to join this site and then pay for a better version later. Most studio sites don't do the internet well but JM Productions is far worse than most of the others. They don't even pretend to try.
I like your thought that this is an early 1990s site with some updates. That is a perfect description. And perfectly accurate!
|
10-29-11 04:15am
|
Reply
2543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm solidly into middle age, and like all middle age men I still think I'm eighteen. Hence the view that eighteen year old lasses are my target conquests. I'll tell you how that's going later.
A few years ago I did have a wee performance issue. I tried a certain blue pill and it did work, but I finally convinced my bride that it was fatigue at night and not E.D. We tried the morning and things worked without chemical aid. Problem solved.
The only other sexual injury (non penis though) was when I was a young lad screwing a young lass on a hotel room floor. The rug burn on my knees lasted for a week. As an idiot twenty-year-old I thought banging a chick on the floor was much more exciting than on a perfectly servicable bed.
|
10-28-11 05:29pm
|
Reply
2544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Close to the bone!!!!! Good one!
|
10-28-11 05:24pm
|
Reply
2545
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Awesome???? She's perfect! She changed my whole outlook on internet erotica. She's a fresh breeze.
|
10-26-11 01:40pm
|
Reply
2546
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks dieselman. But don't take offence to the score I gave your sites - 95 is still pretty high! But I certainly tried to convey the message that the site is just about as good as it can get with the technical stuff. The models and scenes are more subjective, but in my opinion your models are among the best looking on the internet. Simply amazing!
More Gloria!!!!!
|
10-26-11 08:49am
|
Reply
2547
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Reply
Thanks for the information. This site sounds like it isn't ready for the big time yet.
|
10-26-11 04:18am
|
Reply
2548
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
I'm not normally a fan of surprises, but I'll make an exception for you. I can't wait to see what it is. (I'm not-so-secretly hoping it has to do with Gloria doing some girl-girl or boy/girl, but I won't wager any money on that!)
Thanks for your efforts with the site (it really is an amazing site) and for your assistance in getting my membership issues sorted out.
|
10-26-11 04:16am
|
Reply
2549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I clicked that I love it, but I don't really "love it." I just picked that because I always (not sometimes) refer to it when making a decision.
|
10-26-11 04:13am
|
Reply
2550
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Review
Great review. I prefer reviews with lots of detail and you certainly provided that. The iGB download limit per day seems awfully low. The site I'm a member at right now has videos twice that size. I can understand limits, but that's just too low!
|
10-24-11 04:39pm
|
