| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
Tiny Teens 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for this information. I suspected that the scenes at TT18 weren't exclusive to that site but could also be found on TMW. Since that's true, TMW is the far better value. It is exponentially larger for only $5 more.
Met Art also has a site called Club Met Art. I didn't really research that well and it is a much smaller version of the main site. The same warning applies there - you're better off joining the main site. I'll put a review of Club Met Art soon.
|
03-15-16 05:42pm
|
Reply
952
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
I definitely agree with the points you made in your review.
Speaking of done that, got the t-shirt, I'm a fan of Hookup Hotshot too. I would have posted a review but it isn't listed here. I join Evil Angel regularly and now that the director of the site is also a director there I may be able to get more at EA. I can say for certain that the same scenes are posted on both sites.
|
03-15-16 05:39pm
|
Reply
953
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Excellent review Sir. I'm a big fan of this site too and you and I seem to share a lot of likes and dislikes. One of the many scenes this site has going for it is that there really is nothing else like it on the internet. That's also a problem for the site since this is a narrow niche too.
This is off topic, but the Penny Pax / Sarah Shevon scene is definitely my favorite.
|
03-15-16 05:36pm
|
Review
954
|
Tiny Teens 18
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 82 hot scenes
- Attractive Eastern European / Russian models
- Several download options
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Affiliated with Teen Mega World but not bundled in that network
- May not be exclusive scenes
- Appears to have stopped updating |
| Bottom Line: |
Having the words ‘tiny’ and ‘teen’ in a site name pretty much guarantees that I’m reaching for my credit card. Add a decent TBP discount and I’m all in. But as often happens in these cases, I’d have been better off doing a bit of research before joining.
The scenes are all what you’d expect on a site like this: there are girl/girl scenes, boy/girl scenes, girl/girl/boy scenes, girl/boy/boy scenes, solo scenes and anal scenes. The only common theme is that the models are all young (18+) and petite. All of the models are Eastern European or Russian.
This site isn't part of the Teen Mega World network but is affiliated with them in some way. The first clue is that all the scenes have watermarks identifying them as TMW scenes. I don’t have a TMW subscription now so I can’t confirm if the TT18 scenes are just copied from TMW. There is no search function on the TMW preview pages for models but a scan for a few models indicates that the TT18 scenes may be exclusive to that site. (But if that’s the case, why have a TMW watermark?)
The site currently has 82 scenes uploaded and it looks like that might be it since the last scene was added over a month ago on February 10, 2016. Prior to that date it looks like one new scene was being uploaded approximately every two weeks but in the week or so before the last update there was a scene added every couple of days. I’ll be sure to add a comment if the site starts updating again while I have a membership.
Each scene is offered in multiple resolutions. Most are offered in 1080p, 720p, 540p and 405p. A few don’t offer the 1080p. I downloaded the 720p files and those play at between 5,000 and 8,000 kb/s. The videos are available for streaming too but there aren't any optional resolutions; you get what you get. (For those interested in the highest resolution files, the 1080p scenes have a bitrate of 8,000kb/s.)
The site offers photos as singles or zips. I sampled a few and found they came in at 1667x2500. That’s not class-leading but not bad either. But it’s fair to say this is more a video than a photo site.
The site supports download managers and I had no problem queuing files for download. Download speeds were average and I didn’t encounter any limits.
The site has some flaws, the biggest of which is that there really is nothing about it that would mark it as a stand-alone site from the Teen Mega World network. The fact that it hasn’t updated in over a month is also a concern.
But the site does also have a lot to offer if you like this porn niche. There are 82 good scenes with hot, young and petite models where the production values are great. Even if the site has stopped growing you get access to 82 scenes for $10. That is a great value in my opinion.
The big unknown is whether or not the scenes at TT18 are exclusive or whether you can also find them on the Teen Mega World network. If they are also on TMW then that’s the route to follow as the TMW network is exponentially bigger for only $5 more per month. Maybe if there is a PU member with a subscription to both sites can offer a conclusive answer in a comment.
I usually offer a recommendation to join or avoid a site but in this case I’m not doing that. The site offers a lot of good porn for a low price but has some flaws. But anyone who likes this kind of porn can join knowing what the flaws are so they don’t get a surprise and, as GI Joe would say, “knowing is half the battle.” |
|
03-14-16 03:51pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
955
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
Please consider writing a review. Your review will be more current than mine and it always helps to have a different perspective. I'll look forward to reading it.
|
03-14-16 03:49pm
|
Reply
956
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to clarify some of my comments. Your comment that I misunderstood the bonus material is correct. If I can, I'll edit my review. If I can't anyone reading the review should note that the bonus scenes can be streamed but not downloaded.
|
03-14-16 03:38pm
|
Review
957
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site
- Multiple updates daily
- Great value for video and photo collectors
- Multiple download and streaming options
- Photos available as singles and zips
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Mostly non-exclusive
- Model names are often incorrect |
| Bottom Line: |
I can’t really explain why I waited so long to join this mega site but now that I have I wish I had more information. I hope that my comments might make PU reader more informed about what the site has to offer. Club Seventeen is a generic porn site that focuses on young models (18 to early 20s) and covers all of the main porn niches that you’d expect. The site is pretty good but is much better for the casual porn collector rather than the serious porn hoarder like me. I’ll start with the bad news.
I think the biggest drawback to the site is that most, if not all, of the material here is non-exclusive. The vast majority of the models are Eastern European and Russian and having subscribed to many EE/Russian model sites over the years I saw a lot of repeats. This isn't all bad since joining this site gives you access to a lot of porn from other sites so this may be a cost-effective way to get some popular EE/Russian models.
The bad news about joining to get stuff from specific models is that the site seems to pretty much make up model names as they go along. Yes, I know that EE/Russian models change their names more often than American models change their socks but most of the model names here don’t line up with any known aliases for these models. There are several dozen American pornstars on the site too and even they have made up names. So if you’re looking for a specific model you’ll likely be going on facial recognition.
The site offers some ‘bonus’ material from other porn sites. It is clearly identified when it is part of the bonus and the original site is also identified. While it is possible to see this as advertising since you can join the ‘bonus’ site through Club Seventeen you should note that it is more than an ad because you are giving streaming access to those scenes. (It should be noted that Club Seventeen doesn’t use the same trick that Bang Bros is notorious for and when you click on a bonus here you are not deemed to have joined the additional site and have it billed to your card.)
The site has a lot going for it too. For one thing, it’s huge. There are over 3100 models here with almost 5000 videos and almost 8500 photo sets. For the subscription fee (with a great TBP discount, BTW) this is an amazing value for your porn dollars.
The site updates daily with multiple uploads per day. Both videos and photos are added each day.
The site offers a lot for both video and photo collectors. Overall the video quality is better than average. All the newer videos are available to be streamed or downloaded in multiple resolutions, most often in 540p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 1080p videos because the file sizes were reasonable and bitrates for those varied from 12,000 to 8,000 kb/s. Older videos can top out at 1280x720 with bitrates around 5,000 kb/s. The really old videos (the site started in 2000) are mostly 540p but that’s to be expected.
Photos are available as zips and as singles. I don’t collect photos but the newest sets (dating back about a year) are offered with a 2667x4000 resolution. They look great. Older sets are lower resolutions obviously.
One feature I like is that the site shows you the videos and photo sets that will be released over the coming two weeks.
The site allows download managers and I had no problems using IDM. The links didn’t time out quickly. I didn’t find any download limit either and I downloaded 70GB in a day with no issues.
As for a recommendation, the answer is both yes and maybe. I’d definitely recommend a membership here to someone who dabbles in porn collecting. For the casual collector this site offers a huge amount of non-exclusive porn on an easy-to-use site with an amazing discounted price. This is likely one of the best values available. But I think the answer has to be different for the serious porn collector: I think the best I can say is that a serious collector may want to consider joining. The reason I say that for the serious collector is that you may find that you already have a lot of what’s offered here and if you’re trying to add scenes and photos of your favorite models you’ll be frustrated that the names are made up. But even for the serious collector, this is an amazing deal. So count that as a conditional recommendation and if you join you’re at least aware of what you’ll get, and what limitations there are, when you do. |
|
03-12-16 05:56am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
958
|
Yonitale
(0)
|
Reply of
Vito's Reply
Let's hope the webmaster reads your comments and decides to make a site usable for customers.
|
03-12-16 05:53am
|
Reply
959
|
Yonitale
(0)
|
Reply of
Vito's Review
An Interesting and informative review.
I really like your comment: "NOTE TO THE WEB DESIGNER: YOUR JOB IS TO DESIGN A GOOD AND PRACTICAL INTERFACE FOR THE CUSTOMERS (ME), NOT A FANCY BUT SUPER SLOW ONE FOR YOURSELF." Those should be words to live by for any website designer.
And 50+ clicks to get to older sets? That's insane!
|
03-11-16 10:51am
|
Reply
960
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
Consider posting a review when you can. I was a member for maybe six or eight months and really liked the site. I'm interested to hear what you think of this genre of porn. I realize that it isn't for everyone but for those of us who like it there really isn't anything else like it on the internet. (Unless you happen to know of similar sites and if you do then please let me know!)
|
03-11-16 04:59am
|
Reply
961
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Daily for me. I've joined many sites that appeared there.
|
03-10-16 04:38am
|
Reply
962
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I hate mornings...
|
03-06-16 06:35am
|
Reply
963
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
creepingdeath84's Comment
So much of what we like in porn is purely subjective that it's almost impossible to separate that from an objective idea. I agree with a lot of what you say here but I have to add that I find all the ingredients that ECG adds together gives a sum greater than the individual parts. Some of the things you dislike I like a lot, such as the interview while the model is having her makeup done. I like that the site isn't unnecessarily complex. For me though, the best part of the site is that the models are amazing.
The value of PU is that we have a place to express these opinions, and I'm glad to see the webmaster weighed in too.
|
03-04-16 10:06am
|
Reply
964
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Glad I could help. I still watch a couple of scenes from the site but otherwise it really isn't worth the fee.
|
03-02-16 05:40pm
|
Reply
965
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the answer - even though I was hoping for a different one! They had some great public nudity stuff and those Caribbean shoots were amazing. I'll never delete those from my collection.
|
03-02-16 05:39pm
|
Reply
966
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
creepingdeath84's Reply
A great thing about this site is that we can agree to disagree because of different tastes. I'm a big fan of Exploited College Girls and many of the things that you see as negatives I really like. Sure, I'd change a few things but I like the interviews because so many of the models don't show up elsewhere.
I will have to admit to coming around a bit on NVG. I was a member recently and I found I liked many of the scenes more than I had in past memberships. I just wish they'd ditch the 1990s looking website!
Welcome to Pornusers. I hope you feel welcome here and stick around. This site used to be a lot more active but with some recent changes it seems to be coming back. There are a lot of new names here. I doubt you'll find another porn forum with the comraderie and decorum that you'll find here.
|
03-02-16 05:38pm
|
Reply
967
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is one of my favorite sites too. My favorite videos are the Nude-in-Public stuff and the scenes shot in the Caribbean. When I was last a member here (about a year ago) there were very few new NIP videos and no new Caribbean shoots. Have there been any of these added recently that you can see?
Thanks!
|
02-24-16 02:44pm
|
Reply
968
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the comment.
I’m not very technically-minded so I was worried that I might have misread my specs. But I checked and I do see download speeds of 25MB/s using Internet Download Manger. Could IDM make a difference?
I wish I could tell you how much I’m paying for this but I can’t with any certainty because my wife pays that bill and our internet service is bundled with two separate landlines, one cellphone with long distance and data, and TV. One advantage that we may have is that we have fiberop right to the house. I realize that many ISPs get fiberop into neighbourhoods, but I have a fiberop line right into a box in my house. I think if the internet was bought as a stand-alone service it’d pretty pricey. Looking at their pricing guide I think I’d pay between $80 and $100 per month. It’s lower than that for me because of the bundle.
Having said all that, I may have to update my answer because for some reason my internet connection is really slow right now. I did a speed test that showed it much slower than I’m used to. Then I went to an active membership I have at Swallow Salon where I see fast downloads and tried downloading last week’s update again. The file size is 1.08GB and I know when I downloaded it last week it took about a minute. Tonight I’m seeing 1MB/s and the download would have taken more than eight minutes if I let it continue. But I know that it was only a minute or so last week.
I suspect that the rates are likely higher here in Canada. They certainly are for cellphones.
I hope some of this helps.
|
02-23-16 02:53pm
|
Reply
969
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Agreed. I suspect this is part of the whole budget issue...
|
02-23-16 02:28pm
|
Review
970
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exclusive content
- Some amazing hardcore scenes
- Many beautiful European and Russian models
- Tons of anal sex (yes, that’s a positive thing for me)
- Supports download managers
- Large site (almost 500 scenes)
- Includes a sub-site with access to scenes from Private Studio |
| Cons: |
- Wide chasm between file resolutions
- Slow download speeds
- Fewer download options than there used to be
- Streaming begins automatically |
| Bottom Line: |
Many will remember Pierre Woodman from his glory days with Private Studio where he was behind some big-budget, shot-on-location features with many of the hottest models in the business. Those days are over it seems and I suspect the porn economy is the biggest culprit. Woodman is still making porn but it is quite different from those big-budget features.
Some people – and I might be one of them depending on my mood when asked – might say that Woodman’s current porn is better than he used to make. The locations aren't exotic – they’re shot in a hotel room, the women are beautiful but not all up to the Private calibre and the male talent is now Pierre himself, in all his hairy, middle-aged glory rather than the buff swordsmen he used to hire. But while Woodman no longer has the budget to shoot classy-but-hard hardcore in the Caribbean he manages to produce some of the hottest hardcore porn available today. Do not ever make the mistake of thinking this might be fun for you and the missus to curl up and watch lest she have you arrested for being a pervert.
Most of the scenes follow a formula: there’s an interview, some undressing and then the fun begins. That ‘fun’ usually includes deep-throating, rimming, vaginal sex, anal play and anal sex.
The scenes are almost as hard as what you’ll find at Legal Porno (without the unusual membership requirements) and almost as misogynistic as Max Hardcore at his worst. Woodman puts many beautiful European and Russian – and a few American – models through the wringer of some super-intense sex. For those who like anal, it’s fair to say that at least 90% of the scenes feature some serious anal sex.
It’s also fair to say that not all porn is meant to appeal to all people and this is a perfect example of that. Don’t join this site if you think EroticaX pushes the limits of what you’ll watch.
While the porn is amazing the site itself drops the ball. The site is a bit illogical but browsing around for a few minutes will give you some comfort.
I last reviewed this site a few years ago and either the site has changed or I made a serious error in my earlier review. But the change is so specific that it makes more sense that the site changed. The last time I looked at the site it offered three resolutions and two formats. There are still three resolutions available (now only MP4) but the range they cover is too broad in my opinion. There is a low “smartphone” resolution, an “HQ” resolution” (960x540, 1400kb/s) and then a higher resolution file. That higher resolution is either 4K or 1920x1280 with bitrates over 10,000kb/s. File sizes can be up to 15GB though!! If my older review is correct the site used to offer a 1280x720 resolution and they really should make that available again because you can’t call the difference between the file options a gap – it’s a wide chasm. I try to download the file that offers the best balance between clarity and file size but the available options here don’t allow for that compromise.
One thing that hasn’t changed is a minor complaint: when opening a scene page the scene will start streaming automatically. Make sure your speakers are turned off before accessing a scene.
To add to the problem is the fact that the download speeds are much lower than I’m used to. I usually see speeds between 22 and 25 MB/s but here I had between 3 and 5 MB/s. Downloading one of the 15GB files at those speeds would take a long time but the site does support download managers.
The site currently has close to 500 scenes. These are all exclusive and most are more than an hour long. The site appears to be updating but not on any regular schedule. Some updates are only a day apart while other times ten days may pass between an update. I suspect that a lot of this is due to Woodman pretty much running a one-man show.
The membership includes access to a sub-site call “Scenes XXX” which gives access to a lot of Woodman’s older work. The scene resolutions are the same as with the main page. The main page might be interpreted as including two other sites – Wake Up N Fuck and Woodman Films – but that interpretation would be wrong. WUNF is a stand-alone site that requires a separate membership and it appears that WF uses a PPV or similar model. There’s still good value for your membership here, but don’t join expecting wider free access. (Though I highly recommend checking out WUNF.)
The intensity and rawness of the porn is enough for me to wholeheartedly recommend the site to anyone who likes those traits. There are several serious flaws and what bugs me about those flaws – the lack of a ‘middle’ resolution and slow speeds – is that they could be easily fixed making this a much better site. I’ll definitely be back again and again, and I hope the next time I join I’ll find 1080p videos and fast downloads. |
|
02-22-16 04:01pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
971
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
What Jay G said.
|
02-15-16 01:39pm
|
Reply
972
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I ran out of space in my review and forgot to mention a few key details:
- There are 178 scenes here
- The site updates regularly
- Some newer scenes have 4K as the top resolution. File sizes are over 10GB so I haven’t downloaded any of those. (These file sizes make the need for a 720p option more acute.)
|
02-13-16 05:08am
|
Review
973
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Whole is greater than its parts
- Minimal set-up (like massage scenes) but it works
- Beautiful models
- Some A-list American models but mostly EE
- Lots of anal
- Some rare anals |
| Cons: |
- Wide Chasm between download resolutions
- Weak website
- Download speeds about half what I get elsewhere
- Some may find it too misogynistic
- Some may not like Pierre Woodman (polarizing figure on other forums)
- Scenes are undated
- Scenes start to stream immediate when page loads |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve been a member here four times in the past and started my first membership when the site was fairly new. The fact that I’ve rejoined again likely indicates what I think of the site and whether or not I’d recommend it. If I had to sum up an objective look at this site in one sentence this might do it: the site has some serious specific flaws but this is definitely a case of the whole being much greater than the sum of its parts. Put more simply; I’m willing to overlook a few weak spots to get access to porn this good.
I’d better qualify my bold statement of ‘porn this good’ before I move on as the site owner/male talent can be polarizing and the kind of porn can be too. Many readers will be familiar with Pierre Woodman’s work: he was a prolific director for the Private studio. Private made some of the best porn on the planet for many years and Woodman was behind much of that. Woodman is a polarizing figure on some other forums and many people actively dislike him. My suspicion is that this is mostly grounded in the kind of porn he produces now: this isn't couples porn; this is hardcore porn that feeds a specific male fantasy. My opinion of Woodman is colored by the fact that I like the porn, but more swayed by the fact that he doesn’t fall into the trap that catches so many males in porn: Woodman never forgets why his customers are buying his porn; his role is to showcase the women and to not upstage them.
It’s best to note that the scenes here are definitely too misogynistic for some potential members. A turn-off for many will be that most of the scenes have anal sex in them. Feminists probably hate Pierre Woodman for his current stuff.
Some potential members may also dislike that each scene follows the same premise: Woodman tiptoes into a hotel room early in the morning to find a sleeping model and hot sex follows. While I’m not a fan of repetitive porn I’m willing to accept it where it works and doesn’t get in the way of a good scene. While repetitive, it works as a means to get into some amazing porn so I won’t complain.
The scenes are pretty rough but Woodman is known for that these days. If you like ‘artcore’ porn then don’t join the site hoping to curl up with your wife to watch two people in the physical act of love. Try that with this site and your wife will leave you. Most scenes have deep-throating, face-fucking, female-on-male rimming and anal sex. This is just a guess, but anal sex occurs in 80%+ of the scenes. (An advantage to this is that Woodman gets some first and rare anals. Most scenes have Woodman as the male talent (shooting in POV) but there is other male talent here as well as some b/b/g and b/g/g threeways.
Most of the models here are Eastern European and Russian but there are some A-list American models. It is fair to say that all the models are beautiful women.
The site is very basic and outdated. I’ll be kind and say that a modern site design isn't really needed here because the porn is mostly the same in each scene with the only difference being the model but the reality is that the site could use some modernization with searching and tags.
Opening a scene brings you to a separate page where you can download or stream the scene. There are no streaming options. A word of warning is that streaming begins automatically when you open a scene page. To make things worse, the intro to every scene has to be the loudest intro on the internet today. Turn your speakers off first.
There are three download options available. Obviously these will differ with older scenes. If the site has one serious flaw that needed to be fixed yesterday it is the wide chasm between file resolutions. The top two resolutions are 960x540 and 1500kb/s and 1920x1080 and 10,000 kb/s. Simple choice though, right? The problem is file size: the lower resolution files come in at or below 1GB whereas the higher res files can top out at over 5GB. The site really needs to plug the gap with a 720p file that has a decent bitrate. While this is a serious site flaw I will admit that the lower resolution files better than their specs would indicate.
I used Internet Download Manager and had no problems queuing scenes for download. I’ve never encountered a download limit here. Download speeds are about half what I see elsewhere. I see about 10MB/s here so it isn't bad.
Two minor quibbles are that the scenes aren't dated and the site doesn’t offer a TBP discount.
There are some serious flaws with this site that are made more acute by how easily they could be fixed. The biggest fix needed is simply making a fourth download option available to bridge the massive gap that now exists. But the quality of the porn so far outweighs the minor flaws that there is no question that I recommend this site to anyone who likes hard-edged porn. For those who join I think you’ll agree that this is insanely hot porn. I’ll forgive a lot of minor flaws to get hot porn. |
|
02-13-16 05:01am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
974
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Enjoy it! It isn't a great network but if you know that going in you'll find lots to like.
|
02-11-16 04:50pm
|
Reply
975
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I wish I could help but femdom isn't something I even consider when I'm on a site. Sorry, my friend...
|
02-10-16 05:12pm
|
