Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 776-800 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
776
Visit Dyked

Dyked
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I've heard horror stories of people who've put some time into writing a review and then lost it if the site crashed. I'm guessing that a lot of regulars here use some form of what we use.

05-10-17  05:35pm

Reply
777
Visit Dyked

Dyked
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

I'm a big fan of most of the sites this company puts out but the business model they seem to be using now is for these smaller, themed sites. They often don't offer good value but with a discount it can be worth a membership or, as has happened to me several times, I just like the niche so it's worth it for me to join at full price. Daughter Swap is among my favourite sites these days and Dad Crush isn't far behind.

Based on your review I might be tempted to join Dyked but it really isn't the kind of porn I collect. That's no criticism of the site or of you for liking it - that's just a big advantage of being a member here at PU.

Please don't take this the wrong way: my eyesight for seeing things close up has deteriorated badly in the past couple of years and I'm too stubborn to switch to bifocals. In most cases I find anything I post here is easier to write using Word (or another word processor) and turn up the font size a bit. For me it has the added advantage of being able to edit any post more easily too. That's also how I write all my reviews. I can take weeks to write a review because I'm always going back and reworking it with new things I want to add or things I criticized but rethought my position on. The final advantage is that some PU members have lost their reviews while they're writing them right on the site. That's not a risk I worry about.


05-09-17  03:52pm

Reply
778
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

I haven't joined Dog Fart in several years and I can't come up with a good reason why I haven't since every time I join I'm really pleased with the membership and the porn they have to offer. Based on your review I think I'll plan to rejoin soon.

05-09-17  03:41pm

Reply
779
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

Does not compute! Does not compute!

05-08-17  04:02pm

Reply
780
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

That's my experience too. I downloaded a few scenes today and while the download speeds have improved a bit they are still far lower than I'm used to seeing on other sites. If I wasn't such a fan of what LP puts out I'd quit them forever. But the fact that they make great porn keeps me coming back.

05-07-17  01:00pm

Reply
781
N/A Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Reply

Needless to say, there aren't too many of my friends who know about my 'hobby' in Toronto but a few do. None of them judge me for it and two of them want all the details I can muster. And while this is always intended as a brag, I close every story with 'when's the last time you had sex with a stunningly beautiful woman less than half your age'? I should point out that I'm 50 so there is nothing illegal going on.

If you ever find yourself in Toronto you should indulge. I note that you and I are similar in age and remember, you're only as old as the woman you feel!

Dammit... I have to find a reason to go to Toronto again soon...


05-07-17  12:58pm

Reply
782
Visit Ersties

Ersties
(0)
Reply of jook's Review

This is an excellent review! Based on your comments I went to the site tour and like what I saw. It really isn't my kind of porn but it is a site I'll consider thanks to your review.

05-05-17  08:12am

Reply
783
Visit Active Duty

Active Duty
(0)
Reply of merc77's Comment

I'm almost, but not quite there yet, to the point where I'll only join a site that uses a reputable biller with a track record for easy cancellations. Companies like CC Bill and Epoch (and some others) make it easy and convenient to cancel. If I see a site uses one of those sites I'm much more likely to join. And I'm also more likely to recommend that others join the site and to rejoin it myself.

Good luck!


05-05-17  08:08am

Reply
784
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

This will likely meet with some disapproval, but I’d call myself a semi-regular user of escort services. I’m fortunate enough that I find myself in Toronto fairly regularly and Toronto has to be one of the best places in the world for this. I don’t have any experience other than Toronto (except one in Ottawa but it was with a company I use in Toronto) but if there are better places then I may have to go there.

I’ve done this maybe 15 to 20 times over the past 10 years and with the exception of twice when the session was merely good the rest have been exceptional. I’m not kidding when I say that one more than one occasion I’d rate the overall experience on a scale of one to ten as a fifteen. The women who work for the two agencies I use in Toronto are incredibly beautiful and are really decent people too. I have never had even the remotest doubt that these women are sex workers by their own choosing.

An advantage that Toronto has over some American cities is that while prostitution is technically illegal in Canada it really isn't. While police may target street level prostitution there is no issue with escort services. Or at least the reputable ones that I use. I might be wary of a service that advertises fresh Thai women just off the plane…

Bottom line – stunningly beautiful women, safe locations, amazing sex, reasonable cost. I’d go broke if I lived in Toronto!


05-05-17  03:30am

Reply
785
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(0)
Reply of bill20's Comment

I hope this works for you. I really like what Bang Bros has to offer but I refuse to join because of their shady billing practices.

05-03-17  03:36pm

Reply
786
Visit Holed

Holed
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I hear you. I took the annual offer when the CDN dollar was in better shape.

I've been rethinking the whole intro thing and I have to confess that I find those really annoying on just about every other site that uses them. But for some reason I like the Holed intro. I suspect it has nothing to do with the 'quality' or unobtrusiveness of it (because it doesn't really have either) and more to do with the fact that it has young petite models sticking things in their bums in a rapid succession of clips. I'm male, and I guess I respond to those things! :-)


05-02-17  05:54pm

Reply
787
Visit Sinful XXX

Sinful XXX
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I like the heat that those darkly lit scenes have. I like the way that the director uses the light and shadows to create a mood. But I can understand your position too. The dark scenes are only part of one series so there aren't too many of them.

I should add that I like the scenes they shoot outdoors too. Those look amazing.


05-01-17  01:45pm

Reply
788
Visit Teens Do Porn

Teens Do Porn
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I like the whole premise of Teens Do Porn. It has the same feel of some other sites like Girls Do Porn and Broke Model (or Broke Models, I forget which one I mean as they are different sites and Exploited College Girls. It's a simple niche, but I guess I like the simple things in life!

05-01-17  01:40pm

Reply
789
Visit Holed

Holed
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I wouldn't join Holed for an annual membership alone but I joined it first as a stand-alone site and still really liked it. It was only later when I joined Passion HD that I had the offer that bundled in Holed and several other sites I really like such as Tiny 4K, My Very First Time and Lubed. So I will admit that the value is in the bundled annual membership.

The opening doesn't bother me at all, in fact, I sort of like it.


05-01-17  01:36pm

Reply
790
Visit Teens Do Porn

Teens Do Porn
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Teens Do Porn is one of my favourite sites so I rejoin Team Skeet regularly to get access to it. I'm glad to see that others share my high opinion of the site.

04-30-17  04:14pm

Review
791
Visit Sinful XXX

Sinful XXX
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High-quality couples-oriented porn
- Many exclusive scenes
- Beautiful models
- Good site for photo collectors
- Updates weekly (video and photos)
- Three download resolutions available
- Three streaming resolutions available
- Supports download managers
Cons: - No unique file names for downloads
- Download speeds are less than I normally get
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line: It is unusual for me to join a couples-oriented site but I was in the mood for some sensual and erotic scenes as a break from the hardcore stuff I’d normally download from sites like Hookup Hotshot or Evil Angel. I subscribed with some idea of what I was getting but I was still pleasantly surprised that both the site and the porn are very good.

The sex here is slow, soft and sensual – and very hot. The scenes feature one male and one female in a well-shot, well-lit and well-edited scene. The scenes are all a natural length for what most people would see as normal sex – most are around 20 minutes. You won’t find anal sex, hardcore pounding or gangbangs here. Almost all of the models here are Eastern European or Russian though there is one scene with Lexi Belle here too.

There are many scenes that have a unique look to them in that the set is dark with only the models being lit. Many of these scenes have the models sprayed with water or oil. This is subjective, but I find these scenes to be exceptionally hot.

There are approximately 70 scenes available but that’s a bit misleading in that 18 of those are ‘bonus’ scenes from other sites that are available to stream only. These bonus scenes are from similar sites with sensual porn and include Sex Art, Nubile Films and Viv Thomas. Some may criticize a site for having such a large proportion of what is essentially advertising but I think that actually offering access to some scenes from other sites is a far better way to advertise rather than having banner ads. The bonus scenes allow a member to ‘test drive’ some scenes from a site to see if there may be some interest in joining. This is certainly something I’d like to see more of on porn sites. Other good news about the bonus scenes is that they don’t count as an update so they really are a bonus.

The site updates with a new scene being added once per week.

For the downloadable scenes there are three resolutions available with all MP4 format. The scenes are available as 960x540 (4000kb/s), 1280x720 (7000kb/s) and 1920x1080 (10000kb/s). All use 25 fps. I downloaded the 720p scenes as a compromise between file size and video quality and they look crisp and clear on both a 24” monitor and a 50” TV. I did download a few scenes in the higher resolution and they look even better.

The site layout is logical and it works well. Apart from sorting by upload date or by series you can also search by model. The site doesn’t offer a search function but given that this is a couples-oriented site that’s probably not needed as all the sex is exactly what you’d expect.

The site has a lot to offer photo collectors too. There are currently 45 photo sets available with a new one being added weekly. The photo sets are from the weekly video update. The photos are available as singles or downloadable as a zip. The photos have a good resolution being 4000x2667.

There aren't a lot of negative things to say about this site. I did find that download speeds varied a bit and overall I saw download speeds that are about half of what I’m used to seeing on other sites. A minor annoyance is that the file names are generic so you’ll have to rename them as you download them. Another minor negative is that I was billed through VXS Billing and would prefer the primary biller (Epoch) but in fairness to VXS I had no membership problems and was able to cancel my membership easily. Finally, there is no TBP discount offered but that’s less of an issue since the full price is a reasonable $20 USD.

This is a site that I’d highly recommend anyone consider if they’re looking for some sensual couples-oriented porn. The site is easy to navigate and the scenes are excellent quality, in terms of the sex and the production values. At $20 it’s a good value for this quality of porn – for both video and photo collectors.

04-30-17  04:12pm

Replies (2)
Reply
792
Visit Holed

Holed
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

It's rare that you and I disagree on a site but this is one of those times. Holed is probably in my top 5 favourite sites these days. I had joined Passion HD a while back and was then offered and annual subscription that included access to a few other sites and Holed was one of them so I jumped at the chance. It may be that I see the site as better since it is part of a network for me.

You did justify all your concerns and made this a great review for someone considering joining.


04-30-17  04:11pm

Reply
793
Visit Aziani Xposed

Aziani Xposed
(0)
Reply of LPee23's Review

I'm always on the lookout for sites that feature public nudity so I read your review with a lot of interest. Unfortunately though, the site features a lot of models with naturally large breasts or surgically enhanced large breasts so I'd probably not join. I guess I can't win them all!

04-30-17  04:07pm

Reply
794
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review

Thanks for posting this excellent review. I find the best reviews here are by people who spend time on the site, spend time with the scenes and then give lots of detail and your review hits all those and more.

I'm a big fan of this site though I also can feel a bit creeped out by it sometimes. But if there is anything else on the web that's quite like this I haven't seen it.

In case you're not aware, the guy behind Assylum, Dr. Mercies, is starting an all-oral site soon. I don't know the name of it but it sounds as over-the-top as Assylum is.


04-27-17  03:18pm

Review
795
Visit Fellucia Blow

Fellucia Blow
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Sensual blowjob videos
- Exclusive
- 27 videos
- Part of a larger network
- Allows download managers
Cons: - Poor site design
- Videos aren't dated
- No idea if and when the site updates
- Slow download speeds
- Download limit
- Two file types and only one resolution per type
- Models aren’t identified
- Overly edited scenes
- Heat is lower than it could be
- Swallow or spit? We’ll never know
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line: I recently developed an interest in porn featuring sensual blowjobs or ‘edging’ and went looking for sites that offer this. Fellucia Blow seemed to fit the bill perfectly, and it mostly does but it also misses the mark in some key ways too.

The good news is that the site offers 27 sensual blowjob videos that can be streamed or downloaded. Unfortunately, that’s pretty much the extent of the good news. The videos themselves, in my subjective opinion, lack in a couple of key areas, but the biggest flaw is the site itself.

The videos are all quite short, with most of them averaging around 5 minutes. Some of the videos start with the female approaching the male and dropping to her knees and getting to work while others start right in on the action. The videos don’t have any dialogue and have a music soundtrack playing. As advertised, the blowjobs are slow and sensual. They’re well lit and filmed with most of the camera shots being fairly close to the action. All of the videos conclude with an oral cumshot. This is where I think the site really dropped the ball on making these scenes the hottest they could be. Most of the scenes are edited so the viewer never sees if the cumshot is swallowed or spit out. The bigger flaw is that the videos end too quickly after the man comes. I think an important part of the sensuality these kinds of scenes offer is seeing the woman spend some time with the cock after the man comes. I like the sensuality of seeing her continue to lick, suck and nibble as the man’s dick goes soft. I also think that a little come-play adds to the sensuality of the scene. But with FB we get none of that: the guy comes, the camera angles are edited in a way that hides what happens and then the scene ends. I really think that FB lost the opportunity to make these scenes even hotter.

This is also subjective, but I prefer these kinds of scenes to be as unedited as possible. If the woman licks down the shaft to give the balls some attention I see no need to edit that out. I find the act of the woman licking her way down the shaft is hot. But the FB scenes are all over-edited. One moment the model may be licking the head and then we have an edit and she’s at the balls.

The models themselves are good looking. Many appear in multiple videos. The models are unnamed and (to me) unknown.

The real flaw here is the site itself. If you’re reading this you’re also a porn collector and you’ll understand what I mean when I say that the site has the look and feel of a badly-designed, decade-old site even though there is some evidence that the network is much newer than that. The entire network suffers from this.

The videos are offered in both MP4 and WMV formats but in only one resolution for each. Both are 1920x1080 with a bitrate around 7000kb/s with the MP4 files. The bitrate seems to be a bit higher with the WMV files. The scenes look good with no pixilation. Most of the files are around 300MB.

I had no issue using a download manager to queue-up some downloads but I did find that the download speeds were much slower than I get with other sites. I averaged about 1/10th the speeds I normally see.

The network has a daily download limit of somewhere between 20GB and 25GB per day. I only hit that once and the downloads automatically reset the following day.

The scenes aren't dated so I have no idea how old the site is or whether it is even updating, and if it is what the update schedule is. The site lists a copyright of 2016 and given the modern specs of the videos it seems reasonable to assume that the site was new in 2016. My membership expires in a few days and I haven’t seen a new scene added since I joined.

FB is part of a large network but that network really doesn’t add value to the membership since the whole network shares the same flaws that FB has. Further, it looks like most of the sites on the network haven’t updated in a while and a lot of them look to be licenced porn rather than exclusive. There are 80 sites available but none of them really interested me so I can’t really offer any opinions. Many of the sites feature amateur solo models and those can be hit-and-miss as so much depends on the viewer’s personal preferences. As with Fellucia Blow, I can’t give any clear information on updates within the network as the scenes aren't dated.

The bottom line is that this is a classic case of good porn being let down by a mediocre site. As a blowjob site there are reasons to recommend it but the videos themselves could be better and the site itself needs a redesign. The network doesn’t offer enough (in my opinion) to support the full price of the site. When you factor in that the site (and many of the sites on the network) doesn’t seem to be updating and the lack of a TBP discount this is a site/network best joined only by people with a specific interest. For the general porn buyer your money can be better spent elsewhere.

04-27-17  02:41pm

Replies (0)
Reply
796
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I might be mis-reading the question...

I download mostly scenes. On sites where I might be interested in seeing every scene I'll download all of them and I prefer to be able to do that for each scene. I catalogue my collection by performer name so individual scenes work best for me.

I'm guessing that the option of 'clips' doesn't mean having a scene broken up into smaller segments. Thank Christ those days are over.


04-24-17  04:09pm

Reply
797
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(0)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

I use Internet Download Manager. The last scenes I downloaded were over the weekend and there seems to have been an improvement.

04-24-17  04:06pm

Reply
798
Visit Jurassic Cock

Jurassic Cock
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I agree with you. I'm making it a point these days to post positive feedback as often as I can.

04-23-17  06:30am

Reply
799
Visit Jurassic Cock

Jurassic Cock
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Thanks for reviewing this site. Back when it was active it was one of my favourite sites because it had a niche I love - old guy, young girl - with American models. I've been dropping in to the tour page but the way it's set up it's hard to tell if there are any new scenes since the last time I was there. Thanks to you I now know that there aren't. you saved me some possible frustration.

04-22-17  12:57pm

Reply
800
Visit Analized

Analized
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

That's a good point and thanks for noting that. i find it frustrating to see a model I like who never or rarely does anal and see a scene that is tagged as anal only to find out that it's a B/G/G scene with the other girl doing anal.

04-22-17  12:54pm


Shown : 776-800 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.61 seconds.