| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
801
|
Analized
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Approximately 100 scenes
- Updates frequently (every five days)
- Top porn models
- Well-produced scenes
- All anal
- Bills through Epoch
- Allows download managers |
| Cons: |
- Most (if not all) of the scenes are also available at James Deen
- No TBP discount |
| Bottom Line: |
There is no way that a site can be called “Analized” and not have me as a member so I joined even before it was listed here at TBP/PU. The site delivers as advertised but, as I’ll explain, even though it offers some great anal-themed porn I can’t recommend it – but I can make a recommendation that will be a better value.
The site is currently quite large with approximately 100 scenes available. That’s good news but the better news is that it is also updating frequently with a new video being added every five days.
The scenes are mostly standard-fare porn, with all of them featuring anal sex. Some are playful, others are rough. They all feature a who’s who of the current crop of A-list porn stars who do anal. The scenes are generally well shot, lit and edited. This is not an amateur site in any meaning of that word.
The scenes can be streamed or downloaded. Downloads are available in multiple resolutions but the only file type is mp4. I downloaded the 1280x720 files as they are a good compromise on file size versus how they look. They have a 5000kb/s bitrate and are 30 fps. They look good on a 24” monitor and a 50” TV.
I had no problem using a download manager to queue the scenes and I didn’t encounter any download limits or obvious throttling on the first day of my membership when I downloaded a lot of the scenes.
The site is logically laid out and easy to use. Scenes can be sorted in the most common ways used by most sites.
A minor negative with the site is that it features a lot of scenes with James Deen as the male talent and given the controversy around Deen these days that may be a deal-breaker for some potential members.
The fact that this site is affiliated with James Deen (both the man and the site that carries his name) is also one of the biggest reasons to not recommend this site. Coincidentally, I joined Analized and James Deen around the same time and there is a lot of overlap between the two sites. In fact, it is possible, and even probable, that every scene offered at Analized is also offered at James Deen – and they’re offered with the same file specs too. But when you factor in that James Deen gives you (likely) everything that you can get at Analized and also gives you a lot more it makes sense to skip Analized and take a membership at James Deen instead. James Deen has around 6 times the number of scenes and James Deen offers a TBP discount that Analized doesn’t.
The bottom line is that while Analized is a great site and it has some great anal-themed porn you can get the same scenes and lots more for less money over at James Deen. So while I’m not recommending this site it isn't because it’s a bad site, it’s just that you can avoid the mistake I made and save some of your porn dollars.
And in case you’re wondering, I scored Analized as a stand-alone site and as such it is very good so I wanted to reflect that, but I’m not recommending it simply because you can get the same porn on a bigger and cheaper site. |
|
04-17-17 01:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
802
|
James Deen
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 580+ scenes
- Updates every four days
- Many A-list models
- Mix of plot-based and gonzo porn
- Downloads now available
- Multiple download and streaming options
- Supports download managers
- Bills through Epoch |
| Cons: |
- The James Deen controversy may be too much for some
- Scenes start streaming immediately |
| Bottom Line: |
Let me get something out of the way right at the start: yes, I am aware of the allegations made against James Deen last year and the controversy that now surrounds him. I’m not deaf to that but as a porn collector there are scenes with models on this site that I wanted to collect. Should I have avoided this site because of the issues around Deen? Maybe, but that’s not the point of this review. You can make your own decisions on whether or not you’d join this site in light of the allegations.
The site offers a good mix of plot-based and gonzo porn, which is somewhat unusual. I like both but if you dislike one type there is still lots here for you to like. The gonzo scenes are typical Deen in that that they’re playful and the performers seem to be having a lot of fun. The sex is definitely rougher than a lot of mainstream porn but not in a BDSM way. Several of the plot-based movies are BDSM-themed though.
Given that Deen is one of the best known and most popular male models in the business he attracts some of the best known and most popular female talent too. This site is a who’s who of A-list models.
The site is well laid out and shows attention to detail and that makes it very easy to find scenes that you’ll like. Members can sort the scenes by the upload date, by movie, by category and by channel. There are a dozen plot-based movies available for those who like plot-based porn. The ‘categories’ page allows you to sort by most of the popular niches while the ‘channels’ page is just slightly different in that it allows you to sort by behind-the-scenes, hardcore and things like that. I like behind-the-scenes stuff and there is a lot of it here and it’s easy to find because it is a separate ‘channel.’ For oral fans there is also a way to sort Deen’s signature series “I Came on James Deen’s Face” and for some reason, there is a channel with Deen eating and enjoying food. I guess you can do whatever you want on your own site.
The site is quite large with about 580 scenes now uploaded. A new scene is added every four days or so meaning that that site will continue to grow.
Some really good news is that while the TBP review says that the site is streaming-only that is no longer the case as downloads are now available for everything. The site also supports download managers and I found that download speeds were always fast. I downloaded a lot in one day purposely trying to find a daily limit but I didn’t hit one.
All scenes have at least two streaming and download options (usually 1080p and 480p) but many add a third 720p option. The 720p scenes have a 5000kb/s bitrate and the 1080p scenes have an 8000kb/s bitrate. Both are 30fps.
The TBP page also says that there is a full trial but I can’t confirm that as I bought the full membership. I’d be wary of the trial though since there is a lot of good stuff here, though if you do opt for the one-day trial you can be confident of an easy cancellation as Epoch is the biller. Another advantage is that TBP was recently able to offer a discount which makes this a great value.
The site really doesn’t have much that I’d complain about. When you load a page with a scene it starts streaming automatically and that’s a pet peeve of mine but if that’s all that’s wrong with the site then I can live with it.
The bottom line is that this is a great site and I highly recommend considering a membership. The only reason that someone may want to avoid the site is due to some ethical considerations with the allegations against Deen. Otherwise, this is a great site and with the price offered through TBP it’s a great value for your porn dollars. I’ll definitely rejoin in the future. |
|
04-16-17 01:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
803
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
TBP and PU reviews. Since stumbling onto TBP and PU 10 years ago these sites have cost me a small fortune and saved me a small fortune too. Because of TBP and PU I'm able to join more sites with confidence and avoid the crap that I otherwise might join. For example, last week I was considering joining Pink Visual Pass to get access to Teens for Cash so I read the reviews. If it wasn't for TBP I wouldn't have known that the site imposes a download limit of only 15 videos per month. That killed any thoughts of joining immediately and saved me $20 and a lot of frustration.
|
04-14-17 05:17am
|
Reply
804
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I'm a big fan of this site and of most of what Kink puts out and I agree that their site designs are looking a bit dated. But as you note, they really do offer some of the best BDSM porn available at any price.
|
04-13-17 04:54am
|
Reply
805
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
It's really rare that I look at a model's bio on a site. If I want info I find that sites like PU offer more than most subscription sites. BTS scenes can also offer some insights.
|
04-13-17 04:52am
|
Reply
806
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I like watching scenes with talent that can act a bit. Riley Reid is among the best these days.
|
04-11-17 03:17pm
|
Reply
807
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I occasionally have to set the record straight when people say that I don't like breasts. I point out that I most definitely love breasts - I just prefer A and B cups. But, admittedly, on a scale of importance to me, breasts rank much lower than a nice bum.
Mmmm... AAA-cup...
|
04-08-17 08:37am
|
Reply
808
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Please don't write "AAA-cup" again. I drooled on my keyboard...
|
04-07-17 04:41am
|
Reply
809
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
someyoungguy's Reply
I did join and I like the site. I really like the exclusive stuff that you also mentioned liking.
|
04-05-17 03:51pm
|
Reply
810
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
LOL! I think you discovered why our recollections of Scan and Angels is different. You thought the models at Angels were better looking and that's the opposite from what I thought - but you note that the Scan models were "really skinny, young, small breasted..." Yup... that explains why I preferred that site!
Thanks for solving that mystery.
|
04-04-17 06:00pm
|
Reply
811
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
someyoungguy's Review
I've been considering joining this site for a little while since I've developed an interest in sensual stuff. Your review was really helpful and I think on the strength of your recommendation I'll take the plunge and join.
|
04-03-17 10:09am
|
Reply
812
|
Girls Rimming
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review.
I'm a big fan of girl-on-girl and guy-on-girl rimming too. I like director/performers like Mike Adriano because he does a lot of rimming on the models.
For me the act of a woman rimming a man isn't really about the act itself as much as it's about the seeming submission. I like porn that has a D/s theme and girl-on-guy-rimming, at least in my brain, fits that bill.
|
04-03-17 06:38am
|
Reply
813
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Many years ago when I first joined ALS Scan I was a bit uncomfortable with how they classed the models between ALS Scan and ALS Angels, with ALS Angels models 'unworthy' of the main site. maybe I'm the only member who noticed that though.
What I really miss is their Caribbean trips. I still watch those occasionally as they're a lot of fun to see. I suspect that with the porn market these days those kinds of shoots are far to expensive. They also had some European public nudity stuff that was great too. I wish they'd have more of those too!
|
04-03-17 06:35am
|
Review
814
|
Girls Rimming
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent site in an under-served niche
- Beautiful models
- Rimming isn't just an add-on
- Site is updating and growing
- Mix of oral and sex scenes
- Allows download managers
- Multiple download options
- Bills through CCBill |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Updates are irregular
- No TBP discount offered |
| Bottom Line: |
Girl-on-guy rimming is a favourite niche of mine and whole sites dedicated to it are rare. There are some, but most of those have stopped updating regularly. So when I saw Girls Rimming go live a while ago I immediately signed up and I was very glad that did.
One of the many things I like about the site is that the rimming really takes centre stage with all the scenes. A lot of the scenes are just oral with a long time spent on the rimming. Some of the scenes have sex and a few have anal sex too. But in all of the scenes the rimming is really showcased: it isn't just an add-on to a sex scene. The scenes definitely live up to the site’s title.
Many current porn scenes have some f-on-m rimming (Mike Adriano and Mick Blue have a lot of it, for example) but those are mostly just add-ons to a hardcore scene and the camera angles are often poor. That isn't the case here: the rimming takes centre stage and the positions and camera angles allow the rimming to be on full display.
The site currently has 29 scenes available but it should be noted that five of those are compilations from the other scenes and one is a BTS scene from the others. Ordinarily I might criticize a small site for having compilations but I think they really work well here because the compilations also focus on the rimming. The compilations are each a collection of different rimming styles. There is face-sitting, spitting, milking, ass-licking and deep-tongue. The BTS scene is also fun to watch and adds value to the site.
The models appear to be mostly Czech though most of them are well-known pornstars (Nesty, for example) and most, if not all of them, speak English. Many of the models appear in multiple scenes, some being in as many as eight scenes. (Though many of the scenes have multiple models in them.)
The scenes are all pretty short (they are mostly rimming after all). Many are around 10-12 minutes long with the occasional scene hitting 20 minutes. Because of that, the file sizes are reasonable.
The update schedule is a bit irregular. There is often a new scene added weekly but sometimes there are two weeks between updates.
The scenes are all available in five resolutions (all MP4): 144p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I download the 1080p files since the file sizes aren't unreasonably large. Those come in at 1920x1080, 8000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on both a 24” monitor and a 50” TV.
I used a download manager and had no problems. But with file sizes on even the 1080p stuff coming in well under 1GB I wouldn’t have expected the links to time out anyway. I get download speeds that are on par with all the major sites.
The site bills through CCBill so you can join with confidence knowing that your credit card information is safe and that cancelling will be easy.
The site currently doesn’t offer a TBP discount but as of today (April 1, 2017) there is a pop-up discount offer right on the site. They are offering a 50% discount of $15. I have no idea how long that will be offered. My advice is that this is a great deal.
The bottom line (ugh… no pun was intended…) is that if you like girl-on-guy rimming you really should check out this site. This is easily the best dedicated rimming site that I’ve seen in a long time. For those of you who join soon (as of April 1, 2017) there is a great discount offered on the site. I highly recommend this site to anyone who shares this interest. |
|
04-01-17 03:02pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
815
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
You've written an interesting review of an interesting site. I've been a member here a few times myself and I share most of your opinions on the site. I haven't joined in a while mostly because the speculum use and vaginal fisting really aren't my thing.
I didn't know that they were affiliated with Met-Art these days. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
04-01-17 03:01pm
|
Reply
816
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Amen to that! LP is becoming a bit of a circus these days.
|
03-29-17 03:56pm
|
Reply
817
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Upgrade their servers again? That implies that they've done so in the past! With these speeds it is as if they have an old Atari as their server.
With LP, I'm willing to overlook their quirky ways because there isn't really anyone else like them out there. I even overlooked their requirement that your account had to be verified but at least they've dropped that now. As for pricing, it doesn't happen often, but there are some scenes that can hit near 8 tickets. I realize this is supply-and-demand, but the scenes with A-list American models tend to be priced the highest.
|
03-29-17 02:43pm
|
Reply
818
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're right. I just ran a speed test and I got 311 Mbps, which is obviously quite different from 311MBps. I didn't know the difference until now. Thanks for pointing that out.
I just did a test and downloaded a scene from Evil Angel and IDM showed I was getting 40 MB/s. It took maybe 30 seconds to download a 1.68GB scene. I thought that maybe I was capped at downloads but I now see that if I'm getting 40MB/s that's probably much closer to my capacity than I thought.
Thanks for shedding some light on that for a non-tech guy.
But... I get 40MB/s from Evil Angel and get less than 1/40th of that from Legal Porno. I'm still mad at them!
|
03-29-17 02:40pm
|
Comment
819
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
|
03-28-17 03:09pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
820
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I had something similar with Amateur Allure. I used to subscribe regularly and then took out an annual membership because it was a good deal. They've since increased their annual membership fee so it isn't a better deal. Now I'm back to joining every six months or so. I'd stay a member if they had a better offer.
|
03-27-17 03:05pm
|
Reply
821
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
I'm glad to see that this is likely resolved. I wish more webmasters were as customer-oriented as this person is.
|
03-25-17 06:06pm
|
Reply
822
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Great review! Thanks for adding it. Kink always seems to be the Gold Standard for any BDSM niche and this site is no different. I'm really glad that they now offer one price for all-site access.
And others may not agree, but I appreciate you adding "anal in almost every scene" as a pro!
|
03-25-17 06:04pm
|
Reply
823
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
Years ago I maintained a Videobox membership for more than five years running. That was when VB was competitive in that the resolutions offered were on par with what other sites offered. I cancelled as more and more updates were compilations or low-grade crap - and most of it available in lower resolutions than offered on other sites.
|
03-25-17 05:59pm
|
Reply
824
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It really depends on the day for me, but most time I prefer sensual, slow and teasing. I've recently discovered edging and I quite like that too. I wish more sites featured it.
|
03-23-17 03:59am
|
Review
825
|
POV Porn
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive semi-amateurs
- Multiple sites in the network
- Playful scenes shot in Hawaii
- Scenes available in multiple resolutions
- Photos available
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Site design is a decade old and it shows
- Scenes aren't dated
- Doesn’t appear to update frequently
- Scene resolutions are just okay
- Photos not zipped
- No TBP discount |
| Bottom Line: |
For the purposes of this review I’ll treat POV Porn, Peter Girls and Beach House XXX as a network since a membership to one gets you access to the others. At least one other site also used to be included with this membership, Lap Dance Gone Bad, and while that is still shown in the tour pages I couldn’t find any way to access it.
I last joined this site in 2010 and I really liked what they had to offer so I rejoined recently. The porn is still very good but the site hasn’t grown much or improved in the past seven years. In fact, it’s hardly grown at all since all I could find that seemed new over those years were approximately 50 scenes.
One thing that I really liked about the site was that most of the scenes had a really playful nature about them and allowed the model’s personality to show through. I’m a big fan of outdoor scenes and there are a lot of them here as the site is based in Hawaii. Several scenes are available with beach nudity, blowjobs and even sex.
This network had a lot going for it in 2010: it offered some hot solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes with many models who didn’t seem to appear elsewhere. While that is certainly a positive aspect it can also be seen as a negative one because it is less likely that prospective members would be enticed to join to get access to scenes from a specific model. The only well-known models that I saw on the site were Cody Lane and Taryn Thomas, both of who have been retired from the business for many years. (As an aside, when I first joined this site seven years ago one of the scenes that I particularly liked was a scene shot very early in Taryn’s career. She wasn’t even using the name Taryn Thomas at the time.)
Assuming that a prospective member would be looking to join for the first time in 2017 the biggest detriment to the site is that it really is a relic from 10 years ago. Whether you are looking at the tour or the member pages you are likely to be struck with how dated they look. Unfortunately, this late 2000s feel to the site also shows up in many of the scene resolutions. While many of the newer scenes do have acceptable resolution you don’t have to go back too far into the past to find resolutions that were probably just marginal even 15 years ago. To make matters worse, many of the older scenes are only available in segments. I’m not technically astute, but it seems to me that a webmaster would want to consider remastering some of the older material or at least stitching together into one download. To be fair, some of the resolutions aren't bad. The best I saw was 1440x1080. Interestingly, this resolution is usually offered with two bitrates, one around 3000kb/s and the other around 8500kb/s. These higher bitrates are only offered on the few scenes posted in 2013 and 2016.
While the heyday of the site was certainly the late 2000s there have been some more recent entries. While a majority of the scenes show a copyright mark from 2009 or early there are some scenes that have copyrights from 2013 and a few that have copyrights from 2016. I have been a member at the site for just under a month now and can report that there have been no updates during that time. On the main page there is a list of 17 future updates but there is no timeline for when those may be uploaded.
Further indicating that the site is not particularly active is the fact that the site owner, Peter Romero, has a blog on the site where the most recent entry is from 2009.
The site does also offer photos and it is entirely possible that back when the site was active that the intention was that it would appeal equally to video and photo collectors. Unfortunately, that probably didn’t work out all that well because for some reason the photos are not offered as a zipped download. Like the videos, the photo resolution varies widely.
The site supports download managers and I had no issue using one. This is largely irrelevant, however, because the file sizes are not particularly large. I didn’t encounter any download limits but given that I downloaded fewer than 40 scenes it is unlikely that I would have hit one anyway.
Deciding on whether or not this site merits a recommendation is difficult. On the one hand this collection of sites offers some exclusive porn featuring some beautiful ‘amateur’ models who don’t seem to appear elsewhere in scenes shot on location in Hawaii. On the other hand this great porn is let down by a site and technical aspects that belong in the last decade. My opinion might be different if the site offered a generous TBP discount but at full price I just don’t think it offers enough for anyone other than a serious collector to consider it. |
|
03-22-17 05:29pm
Replies (0)
|
