| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Cherry Pimps Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Excellent review Bibo! I checked out the free tour, and found at least a dozen of my fav US girls. A couple of questions for you: Do they publish some type of schedule for the live shows? If so, how far in advance? Is there any way to know if a given model will be doing a show in the next month for example? Also, what kind of audience feedback is there during a live show--can you type in requests? Is there any indication of how many members are watching a live show? Lastly, it appears that the archived content is all previously recorded live shows--is that right? Thanks!
|
01-07-13 12:41pm
|
Reply
102
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
Hi Bubba, good review. I would expect that Denys would have high photographic standards for his network, as he was a first rate photog for the big UK porn magazines back in the day when we got most of our porn from mags. But I don't consider 2000 pixel to be high end--are you sure you got that right? If you're counting hairs its probably more. Met-Art is publishing some photo sets with 39 megapixel images--thats 5400 by 7200 pixels, and over 500 megs per photo set. Its kinda overkill, but it does allow you to crop the photo (say for example to get a good pussy close-up), and still get a good image if you want.
|
01-12-13 07:11pm
|
Review
103
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
--models are gorgeous!
--photographic and video quality are excellent
--explicit but tasteful posing
--videos are far better than those at parent site Met-Art
--easy site navigation, signup and cancel through CC Bill
--3 sizes of zip files and multiple video resolution and format options
--comment section with participation from the photographer
--good site preview |
| Cons: |
the only real cons relate to the relatively small size of the site:
--only 114 models at this time
--updates with about one photoset or video a day (wish it were more)
--some photosets broken into 2 sets of about 60 photos each (applies mainly to older material)
--some sets shot using a lower megapixel camera (6 megapixel)
--the user tags search system doesn't have very much user participation, and as such, isn't very useful |
| Bottom Line: |
Eternal Desire is one of the newer sites in the Met-Art family, and consists exclusively of the work of "Arkisi", one of Met-Art's better and more prolific photographers. The site was launched in February 2013, and now features 114 different models.
The models are gorgeous European girls in the 18 to 25 year old age range. Only 8s, 9s, and 10s here, with most of them on the top end of the scale (or off the scale!).
The site consists primarily of photo sets, with a small amount of videos (there were 8 videos released in July, August, and September of this year).
The site looks and navigates very much like Met-Art, which is to be expected as it is one of their sites. I had no problems whatsoever navigating around the site, and my download speeds are always good. I don't know if download managers would work, as I don't use them.
The photographic quality is excellent--lighting, focus, etc are all top notch. One caveat to that is that some sets are shot as low as 6 megapixels. The sets are upscale (often with fine furniture and well appointed rooms), and the girls wear nice outfits and lingerie. The makeup is well done, and not overdone (IMHO). The posing is explicit, but not vulgar, and always seems to include a few good pussy close-ups. Occasionally there is too much fingering and finger spreading in the photos for my tastes, but there are very few sets that actually disappoint me.
The videos deserve special mention and accolades. Any of you who have been a member at Met-Art know their videos are kinda lame. Not so at Eternal Desire. There are explicit lingering views of what you really want to see, and lately, quite of bit of fingering and even finger insertion (though not overdone). The girls interact with camera quite well and seductively. Instead of being a waste of time like many of the videos at Met-Art, these are videos that you actually want to see. The resolutions come in 720p and 1080p, plus a few smaller sizes as well. The HD vids are in MPEG4 format.
The only real cons for the site relate to its relatively small size. 114 models is still small compared to many, and 1 photoset or video day is a lot less than the mega-sites. Eventually I noticed enough of my favorite models there that I had to join. I've been there 2 months now, and I'm finding it difficult to leave (no doubt as soon as I do, several of my favorite girls will have sets published).
Like most of the Met-Art sites, there is a comment section, and Arkisi occasionally participates.
I wish all sites were this good!
The site preview is excellent, so if you are a fan of erotic photography featuring totally gorgeous women, you should definitely check it out! I got the PU discount price by navigating there through their review page. |
|
10-07-14 08:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
104
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I hope they don't go under--I have them on my list of sites to join. Maybe if they take a break from updating, they can come back from the brink.
|
04-05-13 10:23pm
|
Comment
105
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
05-23-19 09:56am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
106
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Valid point Drooler, and I get what you're saying. I prefer to watch a girl masturbate with her fingers, but I like occasional toy use, especially with glass dildos and those clear plastic ones like this model was using. And I much prefer when they hold the toy by reaching under their thigh. I doubt that Femjoy will go overboard with it, and I agree with you that many sites do.
|
01-20-13 06:07am
|
Comment
107
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
01-20-13 05:15am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
108
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yeah Admiral, I gotta say, some of them girls are pretty brave!
|
12-30-12 07:47am
|
Review
109
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive, often gorgeous models, often shot early in their careers. Upscale location(s) for the photo shoots help out too.
-Excellent video quality! The HD videos are really good!
-I really like the pussy close up videos-they are very well done.
-Many of the masturbation videos end with real orgasms and oozing girl cum.
-Most of the models have an interview video that does a good job of letting you get to know them a little better. The models can also post a comment on their experience with FTV after the shoot is done.
-They do have occasional lesbian videos which I think are well done. I really liked Malena Morgan and her gf. |
| Cons: |
-the photo sets are almost an after-thought, and although they are pretty good in general, the one thing they lack is size (many are only 1500 px on the long dimension). This is probably my biggest gripe, especially since they have so many really hot models.
-site navigation could be improved with a better search engine. Its organized by update date, and you can search models alphabetically. Having said that, from my perspective there really are no search tags that can reliably find models I really like. You never really know until you watch their videos.
-there seems to be just a few main locations that most of the videos are shot, so you will start to recognize them again and again. One place that they use for most of the outdoor shoots is some type of office building--usually there aren't many people around, so it appears they go out there on the weekends. There is also a nice house (mansion really) that they use for the indoor shoots. Still, more variety would be nice. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV stands for "first time videos", and while it may not be true for every model that FTV was her first porn shoot, its probably not far off. Many of the girls still have a youthful energy and innocence that you usually don't see in your average experienced porn star.
FTV has been around for quite a while, so there is a lot of content to go through if you are a first time member. It took me 4 months to go through the most recent three years or so. The updates only come once a week (one new model, each with about 9 to 12 videos and 4 or 5 photo sets), so its not a site that I would stay joined to forever. Rather, its the type of site that you go back to once a year or so, after your initial membership.
FTV has a few themes that feature heavily in its videos: public nudity and flashing (usually 2 or 3 of a models vids will include this); masturbating with extremely large dildos, vegetables, and/or hands (fisting); and real masturbation videos that often include extreme pussy close ups. The public nudity and extreme insertions don't really do much for me, but I love their masturbation and pussy close up videos. That along with the model interviews, "freshness" of the models, and excellent video quality are what I really liked about this site.
Bottom line: there is a huge amount of quality content here. Definitely worth joining! |
|
12-30-12 05:37am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
110
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Thanks for the excellent review slutty. I was considering this site, but I think I'll pass for now.
|
03-09-13 02:55pm
|
Reply
111
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Well in fairness to the site, it is named Goddess Nudes, not Goddesses Stripping. They have a lot more clothes here than they do at Domai. And not every set is outdoors. Two of my favs (Macy B and Chantelle--their Met-Art names), had 5 sets between them, all indoors. I found a couple of new girls here for my favs folder, but I can't pull up anything else on them in the model indexes. I certainly got my $5 worth!
|
02-07-13 04:35pm
|
Review
112
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
--Lots of very beautiful girls here! Updates 5 days a week (one set each day; works out to 260 sets per year, total of about 870 sets at this time).
--Exclusive content as far as I can tell, except for just a few photo sets
--most recent pics are in the 4000 to 6000 pixel range (long dimension of print size sets). There are 2 resolutions (screen size and print size).
--all sets have zips, and I get good download speeds. No excessively large zip files here!
--generally good photography
--first month price is only $4.95 (rebills at 9.95) |
| Cons: |
--Primarily a photo site (I only found 2 videos)
--The navigation has a number of issues, and could be improved in that regard (see below).
--No search feature or search tags here at all. You have a chronological index and an alphabetical index.
--Too many outdoor sets for my taste. Also, roughly 50% are all nude sets (no clothes to strip out of).
--Occasional photo sets have poor focus (I thought it might be poor quality scanning from slides, but the webmaster told me they are not scans).
--The first 26 galleries from 2009 don't have galleries that can be viewed on the website--they only have zip files to download. Shouldn't be that much work to fix.
--The site is advertised as the more explicit alternative to the parent site (Domai.com), but there are still some sets that aren't very explicit. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was a member at Domai.com about 4 years ago, and came accross Goddess Nudes recently when searching the model indexes for some of my favorite models. Several of my favs had sets there, and when I saw the price was 4.95 for the first month, it was a no-brainer to join. Goddess Nudes is run by the same guy who operates Domai.com. I remembered Domai as having not very explicit photo sets, that were mostly all nude and mostly outdoors. Goddess Nudes is advertised as a similar site to Domai, but with more explicit photos.
Once I joined, a quick perusal of several photo sets showed that was true, but I have since come accross a number of sets that disappoint me in that regard. My ideal solo girl photo/video site would have a good variety of poses in every photo set, to include several spread leg and pussy close up photos in every one. You get that in some, but not all, of the sets here.
The models here are generally very beautiful eastern European girls in the 18 to 25 age range. There are quite a few that I have not seen anywhere else. There are some popular European models here, but perhaps fewer than at other sites. For some reason very few of these girls are listed at my favorite model index.
I remembered Domai as having almost exclusively outdoor sets, and that appears to be the case here as well. I'd like to see more indoor sets, especially some in nice luxurious beds.
Roughly 50% of the sets here start with the girl having some clothes on (I didn't really do any counts of this, so I may be off a little). The other 50% or so are all nude. There is not much slow seductive stripping, although that is something that is hard to do properly with photo sets (much easier and better with video). Many of the clothed sets start with the girl in bra and panties.
I found some occasional photo sets with poor focus. Most of the newer sets are very good, but overall this site falls short of other top photo sites like Met-Art, Femjoy, and MPL Studios in the quality department.
The site is set up almost identically to Domai, which is to say, it has some navigation issues. When you log into the home page, there are currently about 3 and half months worth of photo sets on the main page (roughly 75 sets). Each set has a large thumbnail on the left side of the browser window. Only the left side of the browser window is used, so the end result is that the page is at least 4 times longer (top to bottom) than it could be if there were 4 thumbnails going accross the page. OK, not such a big deal you might say. But when you click into a photo set, and then back out of it, it takes you back to the top of the home page. You then have to scroll all the way down back to where you were (while trying to not get distracted on the way). This also happens on many (but not all) of the yearly index and alphabetical index pages as well. I know there is a way to code in html that takes you back to where you were on the previous page, but that is not done consistently here.
You might think with 260 photo sets a year, each yearly index page would have links to sub-pages for each month. Nope, you get the same extemely long (top to bottom) page that includes all sets for that year. You might also think once you were in a given photo set, that you could click on a link to show all of that model's photo sets. Nope, you have to go back to home page (which sometimes prompts you to log in again), and get there via the alphabetical index (which again often involves lots of scrolling).
These are not huge issues--you can still find you what need, and with 870 photo sets, the site isn't so large that these issues would be a deal breaker (though I hope Domai isn't still like this). Still, it doesn't seem like it would take that much work to come up with a better design.
All complaining aside, the bottom line is the bottom line. This site only costs $4.95 for the first month, and for me that was a great deal. I got a good number of zip files of some gorgeous girls, including several of my favs. Definitely worth checking out! |
|
02-06-13 09:26pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
113
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.
|
01-25-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
114
|
Hunter Leigh
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Great review Marcus! Hunter is one hot babe!!! You mention no toys or masturbation here, but how explicit are her photos?
|
03-26-13 04:50pm
|
Reply
115
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Reply
Settle down everyone! Elmien, it does raise a red flag when 2 members join PU on the same day, and both post favorable reviews of a site within hours of each other. Both reviews were lacking the kind of detail that everyone here has come to expect.
For what it's worth, I was a member at Viv Thomas a few years back, and there were plenty of girl/girl vids with Jo and her playmates. You are correct about her--she truly enjoys other women, and the scenes I have of her and her girlfriends are almost all very hot! But other members here are looking for detail in reviews and maybe comparison to other similar sites. That's what we need to figure out if its a site that we would consider joining.
For example, if you've had memberships at Sapphic Erotica, Euro Girls on Girls, and/or 21st Sextury, how does Jo's site compare? If you could edit your review, and provide that info, it would be a lot more useful.
|
06-01-13 03:30am
|
Reply
116
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Two reviews by newly registered members on the same day does raise a red flag. But no doubt Jo is hot, and does some of the best girl/girl scenes available.
|
06-01-13 03:14am
|
Reply
117
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
David19's Review
Thanks for the review David. Site looks interesting although $30 a month seems a bit high.
|
03-17-13 06:18am
|
Reply
118
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Joymii's Reply
Please don't stop the G/G vids--the ones you had when I was there last year were very good! Ditto for the solo stuff.
|
03-08-13 05:40am
|
Reply
119
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks Denner, bonus for me...about a week after I joined, one of my favorite new models of last year, the hot little Malenna, made her first appearence there. She's got 2 vids there now, both excellent.
|
01-12-13 06:15pm
|
Review
120
|
Karup's PC
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge number of attractive models going back over a decade! I think its well over 2000 girls.
Updates include 3 photo sets a day (6 days a week), and 1 or 2 videos a day
Content appears to be exclusive (except for the feeds)
Photos and videos have just the right amount of explicitness for me (meaning pussy close ups and spreads, but nothing extreme like gaping or speculums). No pussy shy girls here!
Photo sets have a good variety of poses-front view, rear view, laying down, doggy
Flash player for videos works well-I can scan through a video very quickly to see if I want to download it.
Zip files for photo sets have unique names--no need to type in a name when downloading. |
| Cons: |
My biggest gripe is the with the site layout and navigation. There doesn't seem to be a way to list ALL photo sets by date, or all models by date of first appearance. This makes it a little bit of work to view all the new material posted since my last membership there (you have to go through 5 different photo categories to do this).
The solo girl videos (which usually involve a quick strip and masturbation) are kind of hit or miss. Some girls give good performances, others seem a bit apprehensive. I would prefer for the stripping to be slower and more seductive. I don't see a lot of real girl cum here, again suggesting maybe the girls aren't really relaxed.
The camera guys shooting the videos tilt their cameras way too much!
The boy/girl hardcore vids have improved since the last time I was there, but I still rarely find any worth downloading.
The photo/video sets have too many chairs and sofas, and not enough beds. The furniture could be more upscale too. |
| Bottom Line: |
KarupsPC is primarily a solo girl photo/video site. Each model typically shoots 5 photo sets and 3 videos. The more popular girls have more than this. Some of the models do hardcore B/G videos (most do solo vids only), but recently these have averaged only about 1 a week. For example, in the last 3 months of 2012, there were 117 solo girl videos, 13 B/G hardcore videos, and 2 G/G lesbian videos. The hardcore videos have decreased in number from a couple of years ago (possibly due to the syphillis outbreak and new Russian porn law).
The models are generally attractive, although there are more "7s" and "8s" here than at some other sites like Met-Art and Femjoy. They do have their share of beautiful girls, and it seems like all of the most popular Euro girls have some material here.
The photo sets have zips and come in 3 resolutions: 1024p, 1500p, and 3000p (long dimension pixels). Older sets have only 1024 and 1500. I am not certain, but it appears that some (maybe all) of the photo sets are vid caps from the videos. There are never any flashes going off in the videos, and the photo set that corresponds to the videos doesn't seem to be noticeably different. Again, I am not sure about this. Having said that, the photo sets are well lit and in focus, and generally well done.
I noted above that there are very few if any "pussy shy" girls here. Just the right amount of explicitness for me. Also, some other things that you DON'T find here: pissing, speculums, huge dildos, public nudity, and I don't remember any anal action either (certainly not with dildos). I only found 1 video with "squirting". All of this is fine with me, as I am not into any of the above.
The 50 most recent photo sets and 33 most recent videos are on the home page. The homepage also has 2 buttons for the videos (Hardcore and Softcore). The photosets have 7 buttons/categories, and I really don't know why, as they are so similar. Those categories are Amateurs, Exotics, Girls with Toys, Hardcore, Models, Older Women, and Teens. I wish they would put them all on one main page organized by date, and then have the buttons. The search feature is OK, but needs more categories. It's a little work to get through all their content (of course they have a lot of content!).
The sets for the photos and videos are pretty basic, and as I mentioned above, they have too many chairs and sofas. Sometimes the models just don't look comfortable. They used to have some horrible painted sets with loud colors and painted bricks, but it appears that those are history. A little more variety would be nice. And more beds too.
The videos come in 3 resolutions: mobile, "medium", and HD. The HD is 720p (I don't remember any 1080p), but it still looks very good when full-screened on my 17" laptop monitor (my monitor is 1080p). I'm not sure what resolution the medium vids are, as I only download the HD. The videos come in MP4 and WMV formats. The flash player works very well, and is a big improvement from the last time I was there. The older videos (5 years or so old) are usually in 2 to 4 parts--I remember having to download and join those (ughhh). It would be nice if they could join the older ones for us.
The hardcore B/G videos are not a main feature of this site (at least, the ones done with their models). Apparently some of the members have requested more hardcore, so in response to this, they have several different "feeds". The main hardcore feed has a huge amount of material, but to me it is B and C grade stuff with B and C grade models. It also is not shot in the same style as their hardcore, so I really don't know why they bother. They also have video and photo feeds from Viv Thomas, but the videos are not HD (pity because many of those are good), and the photo sets don't have zips. They also have a webcam feed (which I didn't bother with) and several others including Sex TV, Paradise Feeds, and Whore Hunter. None of the feeds really interested me, and it would be nice if there was an option to join the site without these, as I am sure everyone is paying for them.
The Karups hardcore B/G videos were nothing special for me. In particular, the girls just don't look like they are really enjoying themselves. Another pet peeve, every freaking one that I've seen ends with a facial cumshot. Please Karups, add a little variety here! There has been some change in the videos--most are longer than I remember and less repetitive, but I still don't find many worth downloading. The rare girl/girl videos are better, with some on par with the better lesbian vid sites.
Bottom line: Despite all my nit picking, KarupsPC is a solid solo girl photo/video site. I have been a member there 5 times now in as many years, and always find a lot of good material to download when I go back. A first time member should do the 3 month membership, as 1 month is no way enough time to work through all of their content. |
|
01-11-13 03:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
121
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
Reply of
davidax's Review
I have used Live Jasmin a few times over the last couple of years, and never had a problem with losing credits. In fact, I once had about $30 credit there for 6 months before I finally used it. David, I would try again with their support. Maybe they can tell you if your credit was used in a chat--if so, maybe someone figured out your password, or possibly your computer was hacked, and a keylogger put on you PC by a hacker. That seems like a more logical explanation. But the support folks should be able to tell exactly what happened to your credits. LJ is an OK chat site (I think there are several much better ones), but I don't think the site administrators would just arbitrarily take your credits. Let us know if you find out exactly what happened.
|
12-20-12 09:54pm
|
Comment
122
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
06-08-13 06:02am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
123
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
05-30-13 05:53pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
124
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The video was very good, and certainly better than their usual offerings. But one video doesn't make a trend. Only time will tell if it was a one-off or the start of something good.
|
04-02-13 08:24am
|
Reply
125
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I haven't seen that one yet, but the most recent ones I have seen have been the usual. I'm pretty sure there is a no masturbation rule for the videos at Met-Art (that material is over at Sex-Art). But what they have seems uninspired, and even at times (gasp), boring. A strange thing to say when you consider how beautiful and hot their models are. I would like to see them focus on slow sexy striptease videos that end with some explicit views (whatever the model is comfortable with). No site out there does that well, and if Met-Art could, it would just solidify their place as the planet's best softcore porn site!
|
04-01-13 10:10am
|
|
