| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
My 5th grade teacher was a gorgeous young woman in her early 20s.
|
01-11-13 12:59pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
I bought a revolver and gun safe a few years ago, after someone tried to break into my house while I was home.
|
01-09-13 08:00am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't like it when they call themselves a slut, cause it gets me to thinking about how many guys they might have fucked. I kinda like it when they talk about their tight little pussies.
|
01-03-13 11:13am
|
Reply
79
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Your eyes didn't deceive you elephant, but it still apparently hasn't happened yet. Maybe Dieselman will chime in.
|
02-23-13 05:51pm
|
Reply
80
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Tangub, you're going to very busy downloading in that month! I haven't been there in a while but I stayed four or five months when I was. Lots of great content there.
|
02-22-13 07:47pm
|
Reply
81
|
All Panty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the positive comments everyone! I took a few notes before I wrote this one. I considered doing separate reviews of the sites, but they are very similar and many of them are quite small.
|
05-03-13 05:38pm
|
Review
82
|
All Panty Pass
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).
--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.
--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.
--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys
--The flash player gets the job done.
--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds). |
| Cons: |
--One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.
--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.
--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).
--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.
--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system. |
| Bottom Line: |
As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.
This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).
Cute Panty Girls 925/154
Panty Honeys 267/66
Panties Next Door 281/44
Legwear Passion 159/63
Shiny Knickers 152/14
Best Nylon Girls 106/46
Jeans and Panties 101/101
90s Panties 128/0
Wet Panty Lickers 82/74
Skirts and Panties 54/42
Kitty's Panties 58/53
Panty Girls UK 47/23
Only Shiny 36/27
Sexy Soccer Panties 32/32
Virtual Panty Girls 151/22
I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.
The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.
The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.
The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.
Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.
As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.
About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.
With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.
Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site. |
|
05-02-13 05:39pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
83
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
I was last there a few years ago, and there was no B/G content then. They did have some pretty good G/G scenes, and of course, lots of solo shoots. As I remember they do tend toward large and sometimes unusual dildos and objects for insertions. I liked their body paint scenes and Caribbean vacation scenes. You are right about some of the videos being nothing more than a camcorder running during a photo shoot. I'm a member at Met-Art, so I'll be taking advantage of the low price sometime soon--they have a decent number of my fav models there.
|
03-02-13 10:05pm
|
Reply
84
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Oh that is sweet music to my ears! ALS for $10! I might have to put off joining the Diesel sites for another month. Decisions, decisions.
|
02-19-13 10:10pm
|
Reply
85
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
nipplestrech's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one!
|
03-24-13 07:49am
|
Reply
86
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks Cap'n, I gotta join up over there one day.
|
03-04-13 06:31pm
|
Reply
87
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
So the 2 sites in the deal are Kingdom and Premium? What else do they have other than Petites and Hairy? Thanks!
|
03-03-13 06:39pm
|
Reply
88
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Thanks for the excellent review! Sounds like they are really going downhill.
|
01-08-13 04:46am
|
Reply
89
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Comment
Wow, I was a member at BangBros a few years ago, and there wasn't any of this crap going on! As I remember it, it was a network with about a dozen sites--I joined for one, and then found good content on several of the others. I thought it was a great value. But similar content can be found at many other sites. How pathetic that they now resort to such shady practices!
Thanks for the heads up Bubba!
|
01-08-13 04:43am
|
Reply
90
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pr0n addict's Review
I last had a membership to BangBros about a year ago, and I heartily agree with your bottom line Porn Addict--a huge amount of content that would keep anyone busy for a month. Good variety on their sites too. Definitely worth joining for a month.
|
12-30-12 05:00am
|
Reply
91
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
pornstacker's Reply
OK, thanks for the info. Having to play a game to get to them would be an annoyance.
|
02-24-13 10:57pm
|
Reply
92
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
pornstacker's Review
Thanks for the review and welcome to Porn Users. I checked out the free tour, and even though I'm not into fantasy games, this site looks interesting. Pornstacker, about how many different girls do they have here? Also, it seems like they incorporate an online game here-is that right? Are there different levels, with different maidens that get "unlocked" as you move on?
|
02-03-13 11:21am
|
Reply
93
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan, I was referring to general softcore porn sites like MPL Studios and Femjoy, etc. Bikini Riot is the only bikini site I've joined (I'm not counting Microminimus because its not really a porn site). I searched "beach" at Met-Art, and it returned 346 photosets, which is probably an underestimate because not every beach set gets tagged with beach. ALS Scan and In the Crack also have some good beach scenes, including video.
|
05-30-13 05:28pm
|
Reply
94
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Hi Cybertoad. I wish they could find a few different beaches to shoot at too. There are a number of sites out there that run $20 a month specials that are probably better than Bikini Riot, which is $25. But the material is exclusive, and the HD looks good. They had enough of my favs there that I wanted to collect the material. For me it was worth it. The free tour model page doesn't show all the models, but I think you can see one or two pics from every update on the free tour Updates page. If they didn't have so many fake boobs I would have considered it a great deal.
|
05-29-13 05:14pm
|
Review
95
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
--Lots of beautiful girls in and out of hot bikinis!
--Generally upscale locations for the photo/video shoots
--The video is 720p HD for the last approximately 4 years, and looks great!
--Photos and videos are explicit...nothing left to the imagination, and always have good close ups.
--Some very good masturbation vids can be found here, though not enough with just fingers for me.
--I had no problems with site navigation (it's fairly basic), and I got good download speeds.
--unique file names for both photo zip files and videos that do not require renaming. |
| Cons: |
--Way too many girls with fake boobs. Also too many with natural Ds for my taste.
--Update frequency is low (13 to 14 updates a month).
--Too many vibrators for me; I prefer to watch a girl masturbate with her fingers.
--Current photo resolution is 2000 pixels on the long dimension, which is a pity because they are very good. Older material is less than that.
--Almost all of the shoots are done at pools. I would love to see more done at nice beaches. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have always had a thing for hot girls in skimpy bikinis! For me this goes all the way back to junior high when a friend brought his dad's Sport's Illustrated swimsuit issue to school, back to my teenage days at the local pool, spring break craziness in college, and several ex-GFs and my ex-spouse who indulged my love of bikinis.
There are a number of bikini sites out there. I like skimpy bikinis, but not bikinis that leave nothing to the imagination, like the ones that are only strings. I checked out the free tours at several sites, and settled on Bikini Riot.
Right away there were several things that I really liked. First, no pre-checked cross sells when signing up, & they let you choose your username and password. Once into the site, it was easy to get around, and I quickly discovered the good file naming protocol: all zips and vids have a unique name that incorporates the model's name, usually some reference to her bikini, and the resolution (for videos)--no renaming necessary! Little things like this tell me that the site owners care about customer satisfaction.
There are approximately twice the number of videos as photos. Basically each photo shoot has a video shot simultaneously, and then they do a separate video with the girl in the same bikini. In the stand alone video, the girl plays in or around the pool for a little while, strips out of her bikini (sometimes a little too quickly), and then masturbates, usually with a vibrator. I would like to see a little more time with the girl in the bikini, maybe walking along the pool (front and rear views). The photos and videos always incorporate some good close up views--nothing left to the imagination here! Some of the videos of the photo shoot don't really add much, but at other times they provide an interesting behind the scenes perspective.
The videos have been exclusively 720p HD since 2010, and a majority from 2009 are also 720p. The videos look great, and whoever shoots them does a good job balancing whole body and close up shots. Another thing worth noting, the sound quality is excellent, and really gives the ambiance of being right there. Almost all of them are at pools, and they seem to always have some type of blow up plastic raft around.
The photos are very good quality...well focused and with good depth of field, and they use flash to reduce strong shadows (some of the videos do have objectionable shadows, since obviously they don't use flash when shooting a vid). The only downside to the photos is the resolution--only 2000 pixels on the long dimension. I would definitely like to see that between 3000 and 4000.
The models are mostly US girls, and as I noted above, there are way too many fake boobs for me (maybe as many as half). Most of the boob jobs were good as far as that goes (no bad scars, etc), but I strongly prefer natural girls. They also have a lot of girls with natural big boobs, so if you're a big boobs lover, you will really like this site. I would say that many of the models conform to what you would think of when you think about Los Angelos based porn stars--lots of big boobs and good bit of fake blonde hair too. From a facial beauty standpoint, they are all 8s, 9s, and 10s. Quite a few well known US porn stars can be found here. I found at least a dozen of my favorites, and for me, the numerous vids and photos of Carli Banks were almost worth the price of admission alone.
I counted 111 different models on the model page. Most girls have at least 3 or 4 videos and photoshoots. The update frequency is one of the more disappointing things at Bikini Riot...only 13 or 14 updates a month (an update is either a photo or video set). Their material is very good, but this is not enough to keep me around for the long term. I have been busy in the month that I've been there, so I'll probably check in every couple of years or so.
I had no problems with site navigation. They have pages for updates, models, photos, and videos. No search feature, but with only 111 girls, it's not too hard to find what you're looking for. Models use their most common name here-another little plus. I got good download speeds. Not sure if a download manager would work, as I don't use one.
There are two bonus sites, both of which are fairly small. Riot Girls has about 12 models and a total of about 75 sets. These are done indoors, and usually have the girl in lingerie at the beginning, and end with a masturbation scene. Euro Sinsations has about 40 models, most with only 1 video and photo set. There were some navigation issues with that site, and it could use a little work. Overall, the 2 bonus sites add some value, but the main site is really most of what you get.
Bottom Line: Some gorgeous girls in and out of hot bikinis! Great looking HD vids. Too many fake boobs, and a low update frequency were the main cons. Overall though, a high quality site, definitely worth checking out for a month |
|
05-28-13 04:46am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
96
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
|
04-29-13 03:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
97
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Thanks for the review and heads up! If I had had the first 2 incidents happen to me, I'd have never gone back.
|
01-09-13 08:04am
|
Reply
98
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Nice review Exotics! I checked out the network, and it looks interesting. I actually like one of the other girls (Hunter Leigh) the best, although Bryci does have a nice pussy. It would be nice if they had more girls with natural boobs.
I appreciate the webmaster responding to all reviews here, even when the reviewers are only bitching and moaning. BellaNetwork, have you considered modifying the download limit to allow a greater limit in the first few days and first week that someone joins? I know my downloading is heaviest at any site I join in the first week I'm there, and I think that's probably true for most others also.
The lack of zips for the photos would be an issue for me too. Very few sites take that approach. BellaNetwork, I know its gotta be frustrating to see your content posted somewhere illegally, but this doesn't seem to be an issue for most websites. We've had this discussion on the forum, and the general consensus seems to be that people who download pirated content wouldn't pay for a membership anyway, so you're really not losing anything. Just speaking for myself, I don't have the time to go searching all over the net looking for free content (especially since there are usually viruses and malware where u find it); I am more than happy to pay the monthly fee and get it from the legitimate source.
If you had zips and a few more girls with natural tits, I'd try the network for a month. Hopefully you plan to add more girls.
|
01-28-13 05:32am
|
Reply
99
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
JohnnyB's Review
Thanks for the update on this site. Looks like the webmaster still hasn't learned how to treat members. When someone pays for a membership, they expect to be able to download content. Not a difficult concept.
|
01-20-13 05:19pm
|
Reply
100
|
Cherry Pimps Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Reply
Yes, thanks Bibo!
|
01-12-13 06:42pm
|
|
