Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great site for MILF fans
- Network includes full access to: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Francesca, Charlee Chase, Sara Jay, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz, and Deauxma
- Live shows nearly every day some days have as many as 5 or 6 girls!
- Live shows are archived so you can watch them when you are available
- each individual site has it's newest updates in 1080 resolution.
- each individual site has .mp4 and .wmv format available (usually .wmv is higher quality)
- hardcore professional girls that rarely disappoint. (See next entry)
- Good mix of pro and amateurs: Vicky Vette, Nikki Benz, Puma Swede etc. are all giants in the bus. but there are also great amateurs like Sanda Fay and Angelina Castro
Cons:
- Archived shows are only available in flash format.
- while newer videos are in 1080 quality, older stuff, across the network is mostly 640X480
- only about half the sites of zip downloads for picture sets.
- nearly ever girl has implants (some object, I don't)
- In general the individual sites have poor organization.
- The archived cam shows are oly organized chronologically with as many as 6 shows added a day, it can be hard to find what your looking for.
Bottom Line:
$25/month is a great price for all the content you get. With 13 hot girls and new every day (between the individual sites and then cam shows).
It's great having such a constant stream of content. The girls keep a reliable update schedule so you can count on new material each week.
Buy or No Buy?: I rate this site a "buy". If you're into hot MILF this network is great. Between the bakers' dozen individual sites and the extensive cam network there more content they you can consume in a month. There are plenty of hot girls and enough diversity (content, not ethnicity) that you can find what you're looking for.
I did something I've never done before I hit a sites download limit. VNA says the limit is 10 gigs and then tey cool you off for 24 hours. I think I got caught in a glitch or something because this hasn't happened any other time and I've had a membership for almost 2 months without ever having this problem before.
Anyway not a big deal and I still love the network. But since I don't remember seeing notice of the cap before, thought I'd mention it here.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of bizarre video******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Variety of fetish content (bondage, insertions, master/slave, wax play, machines, latex, humour - rare find)
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space-
- Thye have been adding a new video every day so hopefully, the lack of content problem will get better.
Cons:
- Videos are about 15 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of July 28, 2017, only about 6 videos available. (******the full site of wasteland.com has 100s)
- videos can be disorienting - some of it looks like it was shot on a shoulder cam.
- It's hard to say many cons when there's such limited availability.
Bottom Line:
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content wasteland.com to add to their network. I wish there was more available through kink. The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
Kink now has over 40 channels (but counting this one with only 6 videos in it is a little inflated.)
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. Wasteland may be worth checking out on its own but if you think you can get enough of their content through a kink subscription - you're wrong.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars:
- The catalog goes back to 1996 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 60 scenes STILL UPDATING
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
- Theme consistency. The whole network is interracial. This wasn't the big draw for me, but it certainly is for most of their fans. This is probably the premier network for the interracial niche. As far as I know, they were the first to grab this market back in 1
Cons:
(PRO CONT.)
- I was surprised to see how many new models I found here. There were many stars that I've never seen yet. Some top talent includes Jada Stevens, Chastity Lynn, Jaelyn Fox, Hannah Hays, Ivy Rider.
- Some anal and 3-Somes.
CONS:
- A little too much of the age-play/"daddy" motif then I was comfortable with. There are some great gems here - but for me, most of the content turned me away with the description.
- Only updates once every 3-4 months.
- Some older models but most are in the teen category. It fits the theme but for me, I'd like to see a bit more of the mix. (I'm sure others will disagree with me)
Bottom Line:
Looking at the back catelog they had and the strength of the network. I decided to buy a long-term membership right off the bat. Less than a month into membership I don't regret that one bit. There's so much great content here. Right now I'm especially enjoying going back and falling for actresses I haven't seen in a while.
This site didn't take me long to go through since it has only 60 videos.
The shallow catelog and lack of current updates kept me from scoring this higher. That said this is a solid site and a great network. This is an easy site to recommend. In short your buying decision tree should look like this 1- Do you like (or not mind Interacial content) 2- do you like young looking models 3- do you like your porn more on the raunchy side. If your answer to those 3 questions is "yes" - then you will love this site.
Bottom line - wait for the newest update and then give this site a try.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Billing through CCBill and Epoch
- Almost always FFM (some FFMM, some FM with "step-son" or "step-daughter" watching)
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot stars: CHERIE DEVILLE, JANET MASON, Penny Pax, JASMINE JAE (can you tell I like the MILFs? 😜 Although KAYLEE HILTON is here and amazing!)
- The catalog goes back to 1996 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 95 scenes STILL UPDATING
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. The organization is done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- Production is strong. You can see and hear all the action.
- Unique setups often times a niche site can feel repetitive, this one stays fresh with lots of interesting plots.
- Great direction - I've seen these same girls in other sites and here they let out their inner freak. BIG plus!
- In the scene with Tara Holiday & Chastity Lynn- Chastity masturbates with a bat. My god!
- Theme consistency. A lot of sites stretch the meaning of MILF - that not the case here. These are hot older women. Usually paired with young female talent. Another common idea is son or daughter watches mom get it on with 1 or 2 guys while cheering her on.
- customer support was prompt and helpful. I had a small issue; they were back to me the same day with a good solution.
Bottom Line:
CONS:
- Only 95 scenes is too few
- The update schedule is roughly once every 3 months.
- Scenes are occasionally repetitive. The majority of scenes don't give this impression but sometimes I feel like I'm watching a rerun. Maybe that's more a testament to how many of these scenes I checked out!?
Given that I had to use most of the con box for more pros, I guess I really like this site and recommend it. I really wish they would pour some more resources into this part of the network.
Most of the scenes are fall into 2 broad categories: "Mom" reveals to "daughter" that she's a slut; usually this ends with "daughter" joining mom in enjoying a very lucky guy. Or son is a voyeur and gets off on watching "mom" with 1-3 dudes. Occasionally the scenes turn to humiliation flavored stuff but that's normally placed in their cuckolding sites. I think this is a really good balance and makes these scenes some of the hottest on the network. I've probably downloaded a greater percentage of these videos than any other part of the network.
I agree the classic scenes stood the test of time and still look great. It really covered an interesting part of BDSM. I liked seeing the intensity of those old shoots.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to all 34 sites on kink.com
- 269 scenes as of March 1, 2020
- Top notch production adn quality.
- Good direction you see all the action and actresses do some of their best work here.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, Sasha Gray (god how I've missed her), Phoenix Marie, Isis Love, Christina Carter (she's really hard to find and she's so good!), Dee Williams, Jade Fire, Penny Barber (I can never get enough of her)
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body
type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- It's interesting to see talented women pushed into interesting situtations and bondage. However I found that while there were some different setups the niche itself became retative. I found myself only tunning in to my favorite actresses
- pix available as .zip downloads
- Easy organization: tags, search
- No longer updating last update was August 2013 (there was only one update in 2018)
- No PU Discout 😞
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little pricy so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
All in all I would give this a pass except for the most die hard BDSM fans. The fact that they haven't updated in a while and don't seem likely to restart is a bit of a killer.
Thanks for the comment. It is too bad that kink abandons so many of their site. But I'm with you you can't beat the quality and quantity of their BDSM work.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. I'm not aware of any other water based BDSM site.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, and of course Sasha Gray.
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Includes access to all 24 sites on kink.com
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
Cons:
- No longer updating last update was August 2013
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me
- My biggest complaint with this whole network is the lack of search. They have keywords but very few shoots are tagged. There is not much you can search for other than model and date. The result is if you don't know what you're looking for - it's hard to find without lots of browsing.
- no photos for download
- I like porn with a plot (I know I'm a weirdo). Anyway there's very little of that. Most shoots have just action and little/no reason as to why it happening.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
Water Bondage has over 250 shoots with each shoot being over 45 minutes. I myself was bored with the length - but as I said above this site just didn't scratch my itch. I don't hate on them for being what they are.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little prices so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
Thanks for pulling this site to my attention. I like this genre. I was hoping maybe you'd do a full review. What's so great about it? How is it different from Mano Job or Tug Jobs, or all the others?
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- As of March 11, 2019, 90 scenes available
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site (works well on iPhone)
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- Still updating
- shoots can be rated and favourited
- Stand out talents include Kira Noir, Kandie Monaee, Sarah Banks, Aaliyah Hadid (her Arab themed stuff is great!), Jasmine Webb, Cherry Hilson, Teanna Trump
- Heavy on the gangbang content, next often is probably MMF, followed by 1 on 1. FFM is rare
- Lots of anal
Cons:
PROS Cont.
- The site dates back to 2014 so all of the back catalogue is available at high quality.
- Extra fee for 4K content.
- Updates about once per month.
- Some pregnancy fetish content (there's a real diversity of ethnicity and body type!)
CONS:
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot message or two - some are witty and fun)
- While I'm often impressed with the direction in the dogfart network, on this site the director doesn't seem to be able to get the talent to "let go" in the same way as he does on the other sites. In the other sites, it seems like everyone is consumed by desire - here it feels like the motivation is the paycheck (there are exceptions are real gems, but they're harder to find).
Bottom Line:
This site serves a bit of a rare niche for find sites. You can find plenty of male talent interracial content. This is unique, as far as I know, to put the female talent forefront. There are too many beautiful women here that you don't see in "mainstream" porn as often. I'm not saying these girls are B-listers. My point is that most mainstream porn ignores beautiful black women.
Plenty of variety. The set-ups are always unique catalogue you don't feel like you're reliving the same scene with a different actor each time.
In most of this network, I've found the wisdom of crowds help separate the great from the meh. This site seems to be the exception. I found myself disagreeing with many of the scenes that were voted up. If you join don't be afraid to go off the beaten path.
I give this site a buy - while I'm not thrilled with several of the performances; there just aren't many places providing this content. And like the rest of the dogfart network the production/ lighting/editing/sound are all top rate.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Launched in 2011. All female action featuring mostly A-Lister talent (there were some short career girls in the back catalog. Some one and dones)
- Decent picture galleries. Normal progression strip then action. I will say the model positioning is better than most. Unlike other sites where several out-of-focus pictures are sprinkled in. Here everyone is a winner
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- Some top scenes to look out for: Spencer Bradley, Liv Revamped, Skye Blue, Molly Stewart, Lauren Phillips with Lisey Sweet (I normally don't care for food play but these two were AMAZING together)
- fun silly vibe it seems like the talent all got along and were just being playful and enjoying
- hot dialog. I'm a fan of dirty talk so this put a big plus down when I noticed that
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
Cons:
PRO cont:
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action. There's novelty and for sure a fun vibe that is apparent at every turn
- Professional production the action is always well staged and the direction is good. Staging, costumes and directing are always good. You can tell that they don't cheap out on details.
Good back log at just under 500 scenes
- update schedule about 1X/Week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- limited model diversity. Some ethnic diversity but not much. Most body types are straight from porn general casting. Tattoos are common (I think that can be hot but I know some are opinionated. Same thing with boobs)
Bottom Line:
While girl-girl isn't my go to most of the time I really liked this site. I appreciated the high production value. You can tell time and money was spent to make everything look beautiful. The talent is all top of the line. As girl-girl action goes I think this is solid and well done
Everything here is solid. So why not a A+ score (good question). If anything they could go with some more creativity. I'd like so see parody/"public"/Cuckoldress/etc. The site could be better with some series or something on-going.
- To be clear that is really knit picking. This sites is a home run and should be on anyone's buy list
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good creativity. While it's tempting to set everything in a dungeon (especially when you're kink.com and own a whole building with several of them - lol). The resist that trope and mix it up everything from Santa's north pole to a comfy couch, to the office is used as a set and situation)
- email alerts for when you favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about twice a month (Before Covid)
- Over 900 videos each video about an hour-long.
- girl-girl action
- Videos looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Billing by rocketpay
- Bi action if that's what you're looking for
Cons:
Pro Cont:
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- photos available as .zip
- plenty of extremes (if that's a pro?). Nipple torture, anal, drooling (not my fav), suspension/rope play
- Top-notch talent: especially Aiden Starr (recently listened to her in a podcast - the dom persona comes natural and it shows), Mona Wales (she is one of my favorite "switches", Jene Wilde (she's new to me but quickly becoming a favorite she beings excitement like few other performers), Riley Nixon (she's added weight since she 1st started and looks more beautiful than ever!)
CONS:
- No 4K videos yet
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck
- While the setups are unique I got a little tired of the all girl-girl format
Bottom Line:
While they are expensive this is one of those times where you get what you pay for. There's no arguing the camera/sound/direction/light are all professional. Each shoot models good BDSM etiquette and goes through consent protocols.
I'm really struck by the level of production here. One of the scenes features Julia Ann (I just got done doing a big review of her site JuliaAnnlive.com so I'm familiar with her typical performances). The people at kink do such a great job of taking performers (even legends like Julia Ann) and pulling over the top shoots from them. Really no one does it like kink (well I guess that's not true there are no imitators, but kink is the OG of BDSM content).
While this site isn't at my tippy top (because I wasn't more than all-girl action) for those that are in that market this one is a buy
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 850 videos each video 45 minutes to an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- Allows download managers
- They stay true to their niche. The site is intense with fisting, clothes pins along whole body, and large strap ons.
- Plenty of ethnic diversity.
- Lots of top name talent. Many of my favorite fetish stars were here
- Lots of anal content (could be a con?)
Cons:
- Cross sells included in membership side. So when you look through something you're sometimes given the chance to buy content from other sites. I don't care for this when I've already bought a membership
- all content is girl on girl
- high price of membership (but you do get great production and top of the line talent.
- While there is ethnic diversity there is little diversity of body type.
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
Bottom Line:
Lots of extreme content. Definitely look at the previews before you join to make sure it's what you're into. Many scenes feature multiple partners. Plenty of fisting (including anal fisting) and BDSM until skin is red (not bloody as a generalization). Each scene ends with a model interview where everyone says they have a good time. A lot of scenes have squirting and the orgasms look real to me (but I also think professional wresting is real).
I found the niche a little too narrow and a little too repetitive. I also don't care for exclusive girl/girl action - so maybe this site just wasn't a good fit for me.
The have a huge network and that a very significant plus, along with great production value. If you really like this niche - this is right on. If you're not already a big fan - I don't think this kink "channel" is going to convince you.
For me, not being a dedicated fan, the price is too high for this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gabrielle is a hot model. She is one of the best looking amateur models I've ever seen.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site is on the raunchier side (as the name implies) and is hitting the "cuckold" market.
- updates every monday (but it looks like they put up material that has been shot long ago. In addition video/pix are put up in parts so you will wait a LONG time before you get all the set).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Attractive price (I know my friend Pat362 will disagree), but when you're spending between $15-20 a month or in the case of their special $30 for year, how high can your expectations be?
Cons:
I hate having a con list longer than a pro list - but this time I really don't think it can be avoided.
- This site seems like it was made 10-15 years ago and just left. I can't imagine there shooting new. Everything about this site screams 1997.
- Terrible quality 480 X 300 0.7 mbps.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is poor 420X640 pixels. ("older stuff" is 300X200).
- only about 20 picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 6 videos of Gab (but since each video is sliced into a 1 minute chunk, it's a pain to work with). There are other videos available but those are content shares from the rest of the network.
Bottom Line:
I'm glad I check out this site and satisfied my curiosity. And having a year long membership will allow me to take my time and explore every corner (of their rather poorly designed network).
But I would not recommend spending your money her. Gabby is smokin' hot and I wish she pick up working for some studios. She has an amazing body and can get dirty on a set (I love dirty).
But the abysmal quality, the slicing of all the content into tiny pieces, and waiting weeks to get the full length video is too much to bear.
Find someplace else to spend your money. If this content is what you'r looking for try myhotwife.com (I haven't joined yet but it's one of my next ones) or Leslie Grey (I was a member of her previous site lustcouple.com and enjoyed it).
I'm going to do full reviews of the sites in the network so others will see what they're getting. I don't know how much I can bitch for the low price. But it's certainly not a competing website.
Like you said it looks like they abandoned it years and years ago and are now trying to milk the last drops from the videos/pix that they have the right to.
$30/1 year is an awfully good price. But beware this site looks like it's trapped in the 90s. I'll try to do a full review this week. Video quality is years behind and movie is chopped into 1 minute segments
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wicked is a major player (owned by Gamma I think?) they have a huge catalog of over 6,250 videos.
- Parodies, Parodies, Parodies. This is probably the best selling feature on wicked. They have a TON of Axle Braun's stuff (maybe exclusive partnership?)
- zips for photos normally about 50 in a set. Often screen grabs of the video action (sometimes promo material thrown in)
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. If there's a cap - I didn't hit it.
- Video previews available (normally this is just the trailer of the full video not unique to the scene you may be looking at)
- Organization by latest, engaging, views and upcoming
- keywords and search are a lifesaver. With so many great models and so much content, I'm glad to see the search and keyword tagging works great
Cons:
Pros CONT:
- favorite and like video functions (this is good for me I use that as a way to keep track of what I've checked out already)
- So many top models have worked with them. Some of my favs were: Sarah Shevon, Britney Amber, Kimberly Kane, Lacy Lennon, Dani Jensen, Lauren Phillips, Cherie DeVille, Penny Pax and Kenzie Taylor
- Excellent super hero parodies especially: Captain Marvel, Wonder Woman, Batman (all of them!), Super Girl (don't know why but DC movies make for better parodies
- Bonus content from Adult time - this was really good when it came to the pandemic and they brought in stars to do virtual shows.
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- REAL MILFs. I enjoy women closer to my age bracket. I'm glad they don't stretch the MILF category to teen moms.
Bottom Line:
PROS Cont Again!:
- Creative! You know with wicked you're going to get hot sex but the writing can be fun and clever. If you did watch through the dialog you typically get some good jokes. You can tell fans are making the content.
- Updates come 1X/week with 4 scenes dropping at once
CONS:
- Cross sales inside (I find this to be the minorest of sins)
- Mainstream porn though and through. Predictable acting/sex positions/etc. Everything is well made but predictable.
- Plot lead-ins can be too much. I'm a plot and dialog person but this was sometimes too much for even me.
- Content rotation. I guess all companies do this but it's a little crappy when it's parodies that should be more timely to take advantage of the zeitgeist.
Bottom Line:
This site was FUN. I'm glad I checked them out but I only hung around for one month (that's unusual for me I normally do nothing less than 3 months).
I know I focused on the parody aspects but that's not all they have. They had some older (looked like older 5-10 years back) stuff from the back catalog. All the favorite stuff - squirting, female-female action, co-eds, and car washes. Mainstream porn - nothing of note which is why I focused on their unique stuff.
Why didn't I go higher with the score? The biggest thing is a lack of creativity. Even with the parody stuff where they shine, I don't feel like they're leaning into that as they could. There's so much more they could be doing. I look at some of the pro-am stuff and they're killing it. I'd like to see the big-budget guys join their unique takes on superheroes.
I'm glad you reminded me of wicked they had one of my favorite videos on DVD moondance. I'll have to poke around their website and see if they have it :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
