| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Reply
Hi Collector,
Any possibility of you doing a review, the last one is pretty old. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Hope you find the time. Thanks!
|
08-10-12 06:11am
|
Review
977
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
To start, I'm not a fan of transexual porn but since I was reviewing the other parts of the network I thought I'd help out anyone who was interested.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Over 250 scenes. 2 updates/month. Still updating
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
| Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price. Perhaps the price is worth it because this is a hard to find niche? |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not an expert in TS porn, but it since I don't stumble across it often I'm thinking its a harder to find niche. For that reason I bumped the score into the 90s (from what would have been the high 80s) because I think it's filling an underserved niche.
Another nice plus is the setups. They diversify the action. To be perfectly candid I looked at titles and skimmed about 10 videos so that I could complete a fair review.
This site doesn't have some of the extreme treatment that much of the rest of kink.com has. For sure there's rough sex, but it's not as over the top as many of the other sites.
I think if you're at all interested in TS content you should try this site. Kink has a great reputation and there other work is solid. The production value is always top notch (good camera angles, good lighting and sound, good set ups). Plus they allow 5 previews a day so there no reason to not give them a look. |
|
04-10-17 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
978
|
TS Seduction
(0)
|
|
09-16-21 07:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
979
|
TS Seduction
(0)
|
Reply of
spank1's Reply
That is a great point about price - thanks for making it. I'm still a member and paying less than that on a cancellation offer.
I'd say I find a great scene every 1-2 weeks. For what I'm paying that a great deal.
|
01-25-19 11:03am
|
Review
980
|
TS Seduction
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus - including a second TS site (I also reviewed that one)
- Updates once/week (pattern is every Tuesday)
- over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour
- Lots of different cross kinks for example: "mommy" play/public/domination/humiliation/multiple partners |
| Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Cross sells on the member side plus a "buy kink gear" adverts seems unnecessary given the high membership fee. But there is NO BETTER for these niches quality than kink sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Important note: This is not my fetish, so in all candor I've only explored enough to write a competent review. I hope you find it useful.
With a large catalog and president updates I think this site is a firm buy if this is your kink. I went with a rather high score because I think this is a rather hard to find niche and people who are looking for it will appreciate the hard work kink.com puts in.
Shoots are long (about 45 minutes of action). And varied I'm constantly amazed at the imagination of the "writers".
Kink brings together top talent (on all it's other sites; I'm assuming the same is true here - sorry I don't know much about TS models) and great production value. If you can handle the high price you'll be very happy. |
|
05-16-17 02:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
981
|
Twistys Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Launched in 2004. Mostly focused on girl-girl action (some hardcore ff/m and m/f action but that's an exception, not the rule)
- Picture galleries really stand out. While most sites do them at twisty's they shine.
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- as of September 3, 2021, 3519 scenes
- Amazing talent. All my favorite MYLFs are here (Lauren Philips, Brandi Love, Cherie DeVille, Britney Amber), along with lots of new stars (my sense is that many new girls start out with girl/girl shoots). I particularly liked finding: Scarlett Bloom, Kadence Marie, Molly Stewart (and while I'd seen here before ALEX COAL is fantastic)
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action
- never a bad shoot Light/audio/drct. all good |
| Cons: |
PROS CONT:
- diversity in casting (tattoos, age, ethnicity. Not body shape pretty much everyone is "porn star perfect"
- excellent search features the "filter" really helps narrow down what you're looking for.
- Updates come once a week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in.
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- most models have boob jobs. I love all shapes and sizes but I know some have a real aversion to augmentation.
- cross-sales are everywhere. It would be nice if they threw the occasional shoot from one of those sites at you just to see if it was up your alley |
| Bottom Line: |
I *hate* the way the industry is moving toward low prices to get in with streaming extra fees for downloads. I know it's fighting the tube sites and such but still, this old-timer doesn't like it one bit. I feel like I'm constantly being hit up for money.
I generally don't buy many girl/girl sites but this one exceeded my expectations. Normally these sites can be overly repetitive; not at twisty's they did a good job of keeping the action moving and different in each scene (that said focus here is on mainstream and
not kink porn).
I went in for a year membership (I figured with streaming-only I didn't want to be rushed in testing them out). While I'm not disappointed. I won't be re-upping either. My main motivation was wanting to check out Holly Randell's work. I've been listening to her podcasts and wanted to see it for myself (twisty's is also a sponsor of her podcast) so I guess advertising works)
I went with a B+ grade because they do everything well but are not killing it. I think there must be better all-girl stuff out there somewhere. I like that they have good organization and a deep catalog. But the big killers are not being able to download (I'm sure others know how to cheat that - but I'm not interested). Also holding them back is a general timidness. There's no character here. Other than all girl/girl what's the hook? (Maybe I'm jaded and that should be enough - fair enough)
Twisty's is above average in every way (booking/directing/production) I don't think I saw a bad shoot of anything in the last 2 years). That said there's nothing that's standout or exemplary either. They do very well. But they're not pushing themselves (and maybe they don't need to, to hit the target audience they're going for) |
|
09-03-21 07:59am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
982
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
|
09-07-21 06:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
983
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Girl/Girl fight than get it on. Fun idea. (I liked this site better than I thought I would. Especially the more recent vides - last 2 years or so)
- Top of the line talent. Even one of my lesser know favorites, Paris Kennedy and Wenona have shot here.
- Updates about once a week
- Fun idea with 1st I dominate you then I make you cum.
- Good amount of multiple action if you want groups
- Good preview policy you can see 5 previews a day.
- Over 900 shoots
- High quality 1280X720 4.1 mb/s
- Lots of strap on and toy play |
| Cons: |
- Narrow niche. I got tired of the concept much sooner than I thought I would.
- No picture downloads available
- Cross sells inside the membership side
- Poor organization. You have to know either the model or the date to find anything. This was really frustrating when I was looking through trying to find something I'd seen before but could only remember that it was a masked "fighter".
- I couldn't understand how scoring was conducted (than decided it didn't matter 😛) |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink is a leader in BDSM content. Although this is sort of different than most BDSM.
It was a lot of fun seeing the different positions they could twist into - also kind of hot to see a woman showing off and exposing her body while trying to defend herself and wrestle with another woman.
The action always ends with an interview reassuring the viewer than everything was consensual and enjoyable.
This site exceeded my expectations. I like the wide variety of models While most of the wresters are fit, obviously often at the gym types, there was plenty of mix. The MILF fights were particularly good.
I hope kink keeps updating this site. I'd hate to see it go. |
|
01-22-17 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
984
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thank you LKLK,
I know it will never happen. But I’d love for the make-up teams to focus on letting each individual’s beauty shine through instead of trying to make every woman look the same.
I support each person making her own choices (especially around medical and surgical decisions). But just from my laymen’s perspective, it seems like too many women are told they “need” to do things because it’s what sells. - from someone who pays for his porn, what sells is being interesting and unique.
But maybe guys like us are too few and “the fans” really do want to see every woman “barbi-ized”?
|
06-06-21 08:24am
|
Review
985
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos. This is down 3 sites from when I last reviewed them a few years ago. Not sure what's missing. Maybe the internet archive can solve this mystery?
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 3840x2160 2.5 mb/s
- For me, the 1920X1080 1.2 mb/s is a perfect mix of quality and storage
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- Steaming and downloads available (much to my chagrin something that's becoming rare these days)
- Mobile version of the site was easy to use on my iPhone.
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
-plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: INDIA SUMMER, Priya Ria, Alexis Fawx, Kaylani Lei, MONA WALES, Krissy Lynn, REAGAN FOXX, RYAN KEELY
- A good product that keeps producing |
| Cons: |
Pros Con't
- NEW content 3 new shoots were added in May of 2021
- Approx 360 videos
- I like that the women are really MILFs (meaning they're in their 30s-40s). It's not the "teen mom" look.
- Good directors many of the talented actresses give some of their best performances here
CONS:
- Since my last membership (probably back in '19) they've had surprisingly few updates in that time (I'm sure some of that is covid related.) Maybe
- Cross-posting across the network (ie: Mom is also a hotwife, the video is posted to both sites in the network.)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity" I really can't understand how amateur sites have better search than a company like NS. I identified this same problem in my review years. I know it's a bigger fix than adding 4K, but I think it's a bigger problem. What good is having all this content if you can't find what you like? |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS Con't:
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough. Although I see they partner with a popular "tube site" where you can get 10-12 minute previews of many of their videos. Kills me that they don't just add that to their page.
- Ads behind a paywall
- Most models have implants (I'm not critical - but I know for some it's a big turn off)
- Most models have the "porn valley look" more make-up than needed. The result is so much of the talent looks interchangeable. Which is sad because they hire beautiful talented women and then don't let them shine.
Bottom Line:
The big thing that keeps the score down on this site is the lack of updating. Even excusing the covid period it doesn't seem like this is the priority of the network. Which is a shame I'm a big MILF fan and this site is among the best around.
The biggest pluses are the talent (they even brought in some talent I haven't seen other places and I watch a lot of MILF content).
Overall I rate this a buy, but only for the MILF fans. It's worth sticking around for a month or two, but you probably don't need the year-long membership. |
|
06-06-21 07:45am
Replies (2)
|
Review
986
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-09-19 06:15pm (Update History)
Reason: added additional information to get an excellent rating.
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- Steaming and downloads available
- Mobile version of the site was easy to use on my iphone.
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: RayVaness, Shay Fox, INDIA SUMMER, Priya Ria, Brenda James, Shannon Kelly,
- I like that the woman are really MILFs (meaning they're in their 30s-40s. It's not the "teen mom" look
- The best part of this site is all the classic stars. There are women here that I haven't seen in a while and it was great to see their updates. |
| Cons: |
- The last update was in October 2013 - doesn't look like they update at all anymore.
- Less than 100 updates dating from 2007 (older content is lower quality than newer)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity" I really can't understand how amateur sites have better search then a company like NS
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot (I know I'm old-fashioned)
- Most models have implants (I'm not critical - but I know for some it's a big turn off) |
| Bottom Line: |
I enjoyed the site. I wish they were still updating. If they were I probably would have gone 5-7 points higher in my score. The bottom line is unless one of the actresses that you haven't seen in a while has a shoot here - there probably isn't much here to attract you.
The price is fair considering the back catelog and wide network. But after a month or two, you're likely to get bored.
My recommendation is to join on a deal but only stick around for a month, if this is the only site you're into. The wider network is solid and I've been a member for about 6 months.
The category of MILF can be a little all-encompassing. I wish there was a little more attention to the theme - but that's being rather knit-picky. |
|
10-02-18 05:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
987
|
Ura Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Review
Thanks for the review Loki. $40 does seem awfully high, especially without the ability to download.
|
08-15-12 07:36am
|
Review
988
|
Used White Wives
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- network has about a dozen sites in it, but much of the content is shared between them.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps. |
| Cons: |
- Small number of models.
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess. It seems to me they're taking content that was shoot 10 years ago and claiming it's new updates
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete. |
| Bottom Line: |
This whole network has been one long disappointment. I didn't have high hopes (with $30/year I wasn't expected the world't best website). That said they managed to fall below my low expectations.
The girls on the site are plenty hot, and the content itself is raunchy (I do so love raunchy porn). But the quality is poor, the updates are lacking, the organization is nearly non-existent. When I look for good things to say - I have a hard tie coming up with anything.
If interracial is your thing you should look somewhere else - there just isn't enough her to be bothered. Even with the ridiculously low price the frustrations don't make it worth it. |
|
05-06-13 06:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
989
|
Used White Wives
(0)
|
|
04-07-13 06:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
990
|
Vicky At Home
(0)
|
|
03-17-13 08:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
991
|
Vicky At Home
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Wide variety: Vicky includes lots of “friends” so you often are surprised by who shows up for a shoot.
1280X720 about 3 mbps. For the newest videos (however many of her “HD” shoots are upscaled from lower quality videos :()
- Weekly cam show, with archived shows in flash format
- Big network: you also get Nikki Benz, Gabby Quinteros,Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine,filthycureonline, Bobbie Eden, Charlee Chase
- Vicky is a long time professional so there is lots of variety in the style of content (g/g, b/g, bjs, hardcore, etc.)
- fun extras like a blog and wall paper
- Cam network has as many as 6 girls on a day! Gotta love that
- Vicky is the manager of the VNA network I admire a smart woman with good business sense.
- Huge catalog with over 500 videos. |
| Cons: |
- .wmv files are at higher quality than .mp4 (sorry if you wanted to load this onto your ipad, you can do it but it doesn't look pretty)
- Boob job (not a down side for me, but not everyone is me).
- many scenes are missing a description so you need to download to see if you like it.
- no zip downloads for pictures
- The earliest videos are 480X360 1.33 mbps quality
- According to TBP, daily limit is 5 gigs. With modern file sizes pushing 700 mb, it’s very easy to hit that cap when you’re checking out content across the network. I know they need to fight piracy, but perhaps a better balance needs to be struck. The actual limit is 10 gig - no warning when you get close :( ) |
| Bottom Line: |
Vicky is a real professional who’s shot for plenty of big name studios. She brings professionalism and great attitude.
This network specializes in two things hot MILFS and cam shows. If you like that $25/month is a fair price for a good product.
Vicky is a hot professional, with a strong fan base. If you don't know who she is a fast search will whet your appetite. This is a great place to pick up a lot of her work. Fans will be satisfied with the mix of new content and compilations form other work (although much of that at sub par quality).
To be frank I like Vicky, but in my months of membership I found myself on her partners' sites more than hers because they were more compelling to me. Not that there's anything lacking in her site, far from it, just the network has an abundance of riches
To buy or not to buy?: Buy. There's plenty to love for the longtime fan and the newbie alike. |
|
02-27-13 06:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
992
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the review, did you use the roku options? What was your experience like?
|
03-01-13 05:51am
|
Reply
993
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Reply
Sorry I don't have one, don't really know anything about them. Maybe someone else can help here?
|
01-02-13 01:55pm
|
Review
994
|
VideoBox
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great value. I you join through PU you can grab this site for $12/month. I've also seen deals for as low as $8.
- 1,000s of videos and shoots.
- Good organization. There are keywords, stars, niche, and channels including content from KINK, Elegant Angel, Evil Angel.
- Roku support (although I didn't try this myself)
- Flow mode combines selected material into one viewing mode.
- Newer material is in HD
- New material everyday.
- Lots of variety you can find pretty much anything here. Although maybe not enough of it to make you happy.
- With all of this content you're sure to find your favorite girl. |
| Cons: |
- Some content gets added multiple times because it appeared on multiple DVDs.
- all material is non-exclusive
- While they have a lot of content most of it is mainstream, if you're looking for the more niche material, you'll find it; but maybe not enough (see pro)
- some of the quality is really poor - there are some films that look like 70s 8mm
- no pix. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great bang for your buck. To have access to this much material for about the cost of a movie ticket is stunning.
The organization is good enough that you can find what you want. I sort of had a hard time limiting myself down to a manageable list of want to sees, because of how much is here.
VB is one of the giants. If you've never joined it's well worth the cost to take a look. There will certainly be enough here that you'll get your money's worth. For me I join every few months to check things out, but don't stay around very long because it's just too much effort to find something to watch. It's like having a TV with 1000s of choices - it gets to be overwhelming. |
|
01-01-13 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
995
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
I remember when they introduced this and made it available in their preview section (I haven't been a member in a while now). I liked the concept but found that the filters really didn't give me things I was interested in. I moved away from VB because they seem to stock the same type of content over and over and I was looking for some more niche stuff.
I really do like the concept though and hope more sites experiment with UI. Especially the big sites that literally have a lifetime of viewing available. (which is something you've got to give to VB they have so much content it's mind boggling!)
|
09-19-12 09:50am
|
Comment
996
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
07-30-12 05:32am
Replies (2)
|
Review
997
|
VideoBox
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of movies (5 per day)
Good Quality Vids
Good price (although they did just raise it)
Great stock of back vids available |
| Cons: |
Some times hit and miss; some vids are just too out of the mainstream for me.
Like to see them add some amateur stuff |
| Bottom Line: |
Great site for anything but amateur content.
Can't go wrong with this site. |
|
02-15-07 07:50am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
998
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Fair assessment Denner. I too have come to appreciate my HD content and scoff and things that a few years ago I would have called fantastic. I start to wonder have we become snobbish?
The second point of your comment is equally apt. Like you I also wanted to like VB, but I found I spent more time looking for something I was interested in then enjoying it. In the end I find myself searching for quality over quantity.
|
03-13-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
999
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Nice review, I've looked at videoz a couple of time, but never taken the plunge, look like I have to add them to my watch list.
|
01-16-13 04:02pm
|
Reply
1000
|
VNA Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
VNA itself focuses more on a cam network, and a good number of girls include anal in their shows.
That said- the individual sites also include anal (most of them anyway). If this is what you're looking for, you should check out filthycuteonline.com (Shanda Fay). She has a lot of content and there's plenty of anal.
|
03-30-13 04:56am
|
