| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1026
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nastyboy7's Comment
Glad to hear it's worth checking out. When I look at the site I get nervous. Clicking on any of the links for scenes, girls, live show, etc only takes you to the join page.
I'm always very worried when a site (especially one with the money of Wicked) cheaps out on what's inside.
Thanks for letting us know it's worth while. Some of the parody stuff looks good. :)
|
08-25-12 05:07am
|
Comment
1027
|
Wife Crazy
(0)
|
|
08-24-12 05:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
1028
|
Wife Writing
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- A lot of new talent. Most of the girls here are ones I've never seen before. Unlike the rest of the network there are very few big stars on this site. Probably some of that has to do with the way they mix in degradation with the action. Most of the things written on the models are meant to be shocking.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mb/s
- scenes generally run 15-30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Organization and search is clean and easy to use.
- Just ballparking, it seems like about 1/2 the content is Blow Jobs only. The other is full hardcore. |
| Cons: |
- The keep re-releasing old content onto the site. This is a problem because then it has a new date, so I don't know how old this content is.
- New material is "re-released" but isn't upgraded in quality. So it's the same 640X480 3.2 mb/s file that was put up years ago. I don't know why they're bothering.
- About 40scenes NO LONGER UPDATING
- Formulaic. While there is some creativity with what's written on the model, after watching a dozen videos I felt like I'd seen everything they could think of. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this site is a skip. If you like the degradation of the models then that may lead you to a different conclusion.
I appreciate that the production value is high. The talent, direction, sound, lighting are all good. The camera always captures the unique beauty of each woman. And each model is interviewed and encouraged to ham it up for the camera.
Kiera Lynn, Tina Tyler, Aspen Stevens, Nikol Jules, LEAH LUV, ALEX DIVINE, and Billie Morrison are all standouts for great talent. I would suggest checking their previews to make sure you're still interested. If you don't like their work you're unlikely to like the rest of the site.
It's a shame this site is abandoned. I think there's plenty of potential to play with the power dynamic and do more of a dom/sub kink. Unfortunately they never went in that direction and instead drove headlong into this "my boyfriend is white and unsatisfying"
In short: between the lack of new updates and the dated video quality there just isn't enough reason to buy this site. It's a nice addition to a big network but it doesn't offer enough all by itself. |
|
12-29-18 10:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1029
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for getting back to me and thanks to pat362. I feel a little guilty pulling him into this query. He has already been very generous with his knowledge on my behalf. Thank you again gentlemen.
|
08-06-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
1030
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review thanks. I've looked at this site a couple of time and was hoping that it was more a bdsm/humiliation site. Glad to hear I haven't looked into it more. Based on your review I don't think I would have been happy.
Do you recommend an sites that better fit into the writing BDSM genre?
Thanks again for a kick ass review
|
08-06-12 12:56pm
|
Comment
1031
|
Wife's New Lover
(0)
|
|
10-07-13 06:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
1032
|
Wired Pussy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- Approx 540 videos as of January 18, 2020
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are: the legiondary Sasha Grey, Bobbi Starr, Harmony, Trinity Post, DANA DEARMOND, KATIE KOX, KRISSY LYNN, Asa Akira. Great Lily LeBeau as a dom!
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell
- Good plot setups: Everything from slutty land lady to punished teacher, revenge fucking, etc,
- pre & post scene interviews
- Usually a girl/girl power dynamic. I found this more erotic than I tho |
| Cons: |
Pros Cont:
- Fair number of exhibitionism shoots, a bit of a kink.com specialty.
- One of the few places to find fisting (vaginal and anal)
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to sort by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shoot
Cons
- NO LONGER UPDATING: last update January 2016
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- A little pricy. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink.com is one of the best in the business and this site is a solid good site. This site has a good niche, the tortured orgasm is rather rare and and in the fem/fem dynamic and this might be the only site of it's kind.
While I'm sad they stopped updating to be honest I was starting to feel like the shoots were repetative. While the talent is top notch there just wasn't as much variety as I would have hoped.
The production is top notch: from the quality, to the sound, to the lighting and directing - kink is one of the best networks out there - and with 20+ years of practice it's no wonder they've gottten good.
So what keeps this site from the 90s, the lack of updates for the last few years hurts and so does the high price (although you get a lot of value for your dollar).
If you're into this niche this might be the only spot to find it. And once your into the kink.com network you'll find a lot of BDSM stuff to enjoy. If you've never had a kink.com membership you should check them out. They are top shelf for sure. |
|
01-18-20 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
1033
|
Wired Pussy
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 500 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Top talent. If you have a favorite fetish model she's probably worked for kink and most likely for Wired Pussy.
- Orgasms seem real to me 😃 |
| Cons: |
- Narrow focus. For me this niche was too tailored and didn't keep my interest.
Much of my complaints from Kink.com apply here:
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking)
- Last update was January of 2016 - the one before that was 2014. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site focuses on girls being tortured with pleasure. There's a strong bend for restraints. I find the site enjoyable but too routine. I checked out my favorite models. But really wasn't impressed. All and all there just wasn't enough variety/plot (I know plot - go figure)
With it's lack of new content and high price I would search other places if this is the only content your into. If you want this as part of the wider Kink package then it's worth it. Kink is a little price - but you get what you pay for in variety quality and quantity. (although the more I explore the site I'm finding how much gay porn there is. Great if that's your thing, but it's not for me. So while there are 24 sites in the network 8 are gay and 3 are what they call she male).
I really wish they would add a voting system, like so many other sites do. It would be a lot easier for finding the greatest hits. The organization is keyword and chronology based. So if you don't know what you're looking for you have a very hard time browsing.
If you do join I recommend the shoots with Sarah Shevron, and anything with Lily LeBeau. |
|
01-12-17 06:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1034
|
XXX Tanya James
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Not sure if I would call them low quality. Bland is more fitting I think. The lighting, sound, make-up, etc. is all adequate - there's just no (or very little) personality. I got in on a $60/year deal. So I feel like I got more than my money's worth even though there are few scenes in my "wow this knocked my socks off" category.
|
10-26-19 08:06am
|
Reply
1035
|
XXX Tanya James
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
She really is lovely. I think it's a shame that the production on her website didn't showcase that 😞
|
10-25-19 02:26pm
|
Review
1036
|
XXX Tanya James
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- I have a hard time saying anything negative about a model. Tanya is a beautiful woman who's look is copied all throughout porn. She has enhancements and a MILF look (I'm a big fan of MILFs)
- Part of the Spizoo network (10 sites)
- For a solo site there's a little bit of everything: soft and hardcore. Girl-girl; multip partners, light BDSM, gonzo. (A lot of Girl/Girl)
- Billing by Epoch and CC
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) |
| Cons: |
PRO:
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag")
CONS:
- Under 40 scenes. Hard to be postive when there's so little content.
- NO LONGER UPDATING. Last update was June 2013!
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page. |
| Bottom Line: |
The lack of updates and shallow catelog drive me to a lower score. While the access to the network helps some - it's still too little there there.
There's some nice solo work if your a big Tanya fan. But if not I'd say skip this site. There's nothing unique here.
While you can find one of their specials if you time it right, if not your not getting enough bang for your buck.
I'm trying to stay positive but I was really underwhelmed. Tanya is great and a professional performer. I don't want to be disrepectful to her in anyway. I think the production could have used her better and kicked the heat up a notch or two.
If you joing the network take 5-10 minutes to look at her work. It won't take you long to find the ones you like best. |
|
10-24-19 03:41pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
1037
|
XXX Taylor Ann
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
04-11-15 10:15am (Update History)
Reason: I wanted to add enough to receive points for my contribution. I see how it was too minimal before.
|
| Pros: |
- Big Busty MILF. Very attractive eyes. Large breasts
- Picture sets are available as .zip files. About 35 pictures in a set
- Lots of sexy stripping and lingerie sets
- Movies are good quality 960X540 4.3 mbps
- Photos are 1600X1200 pixels
- Hardcore, solo, (mostly) interracial and girl/girl content
- Includes Dreamnet network (faith69.com, rebeccasorrice.com, lodestarangel.com, taylorupton.com, aligned.com). There's plenty of entertainment for your dollar across the network. |
| Cons: |
- Small video collection 17 movies
- Small pix collection less than 50 picture sets
- Amateur through and through, so much of the lighting and sound is sub part
- Taylor Ann is a moaner not a talker. I prefer lots of dirty talk.
- Not much scene set up. I like shoots that have some plot (what can I say I'm old fashioned) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is was included in the network I bought, so I'm checking it out. Sadly there isn't too much here, so I'm going through it way too quickly. Taylor Ann is very sexy so I hope she adds to what is here very quickly.
I can't recommend this site due to it's lack of content. Although I would endorse the network - which includes |
|
03-30-15 08:53am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1038
|
Yummy Mama
(0)
|
|
07-31-12 08:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1039
|
Yummy Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
I think its an abandoned site. She used to do content swaps with other sites, but I haven't seen here in a while. Too bad too, she did an outdoor blowjob video that would knock your socks off.
On her clips4sale site she updated a year ago (but maybe that was old content put up there?)
Hopefully she's just on hiatus and coming back soon. Looked like a great site (I'm a big fan of solo sites).
Although looking around here site there's references to mobil versons for android. So maybe I'm wrong.
I wish she dated her updates so we could tell
|
07-31-12 06:03am
|
Review
1040
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Dedicated girl/girl interracial site - might be the only site serving this niche 🤔
- Great showcase of African American porn talent - a talent pool that doesn't get tapped as much. Some standouts are: Cecilia Lion, McKenzie Sweet, Candice Nicole, Kira Noir
- Plenty of hot stars: India Summe, Cali Carter, Abella Danger, RILEY REID, NATASHA NICE, KELLY WELLS, Kate England. They don't skimp on talent
- The catalog goes back to 2007 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- STILL UPDATING
- Easy cancellation
- plot - I'm old fashion and like when people fuck for a reason.
- Good and fast customer service
- Good mix of action. Usually, there's some form of light domination (not bondage) involved. |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT.
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
THE CONS:
- Only updates once every 3-4 months. This really is a big deficit considering they haven't built up a large catelog yet.
- scene comments and rating system make it easy to find the best stuff.
- About 73 scenes. That said the site started over 10 years ago. It's crazy that they only have 72 shoots up with that kind of runway
- 4K content is for sale scene by scene behind the paywall. ($3-$5/video)
- lack of tags. It would be nice if they extended their tagging system to make things easier to find - the current system is too broad "blond" or "shaved" for example. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's hard giving a high score when the production schedule is so slow. That could be overcome if there was a bigger back catelog but the two together keep me from pushing this any higher.
Digfart always has great production: the lighting, sound, direction and novelty make this network top flight. Despite the 10 year span of this site they keep the shoots fresh. You don't get the feeling that you're watching the same thing over and over again.
I really like the concept of girl/girl interracial with the self-aware humor dogfart brings. I think this site has everything going for it - it just needs more. I understand it's probably a reflection of demand. The interracial demand is probably stronger for M/F content then F/F content. It's just a shame because Zebra Grils does this so well.
Over time I would be able to rate this as a buy but I don't think until they have 125-150 videos. Right now I'd call it a network enhancer. It probably will keep me a member for a little longer but it's not strong enough on its own to recommend. |
|
07-22-19 06:28am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1041
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
1st off great review. I’m seriously considering joining even though this is totally not my normal perfected content. To me this is the perfect example of what makes PU so good. The brazzers, wickeds, kinks, and gamma sites are always gonna break through and be noticed. I would have NEVER even seen this site, let alone thought of joining it if it wasn’t for your review (and hard earned reputation). Bravo sir!
I made this a reply to Wrath because I think you raise an excellent point (that maybe should be suggested in the forums?). I see why the staff eliminated the point system (I disagree with it, but I understand it). Having a “sites reviewed” tally noted with your review would be an important bit of context.
|
08-11-20 06:18pm
|
Reply
1042
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I'm with you this is a great site and yes sometimes a tease can be super hot. I particuarly like the risky public stuff. Their no FTV, but that's ok to - they're not the price of FTV.
I think Zishy is one of the best deals on pornusers!
My #1 thing is to grab some of the pictures I really like and use them as a rotating screen saver/desktop wallpaper.
|
01-06-20 02:25pm
|
Review
1043
|
Zishy
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Low price. You can get access to this site for less than the cost of an issue of playboy.
- Clean organization. You can favorite sets that you like, search by model, and see top rankings. I found the search function reliable and extensive.
- LOTS of content. They update multiple times a week and have 100s of sets available.
- Public shots. Appx 25% the shoots contain women flashing or being risky in public places.
- A diversity of body types (sort of). Most of the models fit the mold of gorgeous early 20s beauty. They also include many other beautiful women, while certainly not catering to those tastes - beautiful women are appreciated in all their forms.
- Racial diversity. Maybe 15% of the models. It would be nice if it was more but that's better than most
- Mostly natural. This site focus on beautiful women as they are. While some are "enhances" it's not typical
- Many amateurs, while I have seen somefamilialr faces. Most are women I haven't seen a million times before |
| Cons: |
POS Continued:
- Newer shoots (Within the last 2 years or so). Have short (under 10 minutes) videos. Mostly of the girls being silly.
- Users can make comments so you can see which models are getting the most buzz.
CONS:
- I'd like to see the addition of tags. It would be great if they were user editable. Right now you can comment and give feedback. It would be even better if users could help expand the search.
- Search is too broad "Black" returns models wearing black, african-american models and girls with black hair. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's been almost 3 years since I renewed my membership. But this time I did a full year. This is a great site that does what it sets out to do (not something all sites can say).
I've started using their stuff as my rotating desktop wallpaper. After all, what could be better than seeing a beautiful 1/2 dress woman as you work?
I appreciate that the site doesn't try to be all things to all people. It's not a hardcore site. They do "teasing" and do it well.
Since coming back I've noticed they have more total nudes then I saw in the past. While I love the naked female form, I don't know how I feel about this. Part of what I liked about the site was it left a little something to the imagination (sort of like the playboy magazines I used to sneak, a million years ago).
Zach, the owner, photographer, makes excellent use of twitter, Tumblr, Instagram and other social media. I would check out his work (as well as the preview page of the site) to see if this scatches you itch. Really for the money he charges I think it's a great deal. |
|
12-02-18 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1044
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks this was a really helpful review. I'd had a membership to Zishy but let it lapse. You convinced me to go back! I really appreciate your comments comparing them to FTV. I'd been looking for a good break down between the two.
|
08-28-18 05:29am
|
Reply
1045
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review! I'm glad you did it.
I really appreciate seeing how others felt about sites that I've reviewed. Seeing that you scored it roughly the same as I did gives me some confidence that my reviews are reliable.
👍
|
10-24-16 02:04pm
|
Reply
1046
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
So true. I generally like hardcore only and look more for videos over photos. But the price of this site was right. And the decent amount of public flashing content scratched my itch.
I also really respect that the webmaster is up front and direct. And is willing to say this site is not for everyone. I wish every site was direct about what would be purchasers could expect.
|
08-05-16 05:54pm
|
Reply
1047
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
zishy's Reply
I appreciate how candid you are. I just finished my review and really enjoyed the site. There's nothing better than I site that says what it does, and does what it says. Thanks from a satisfied customer.
|
08-05-16 07:10am
|
Review
1048
|
Zishy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Low price. You can get access to this site for less than the cost of an issue of playboy
- Clean organization. You can favorite sets that you like, search by model, and see top rankings. I found the search function reliable and extensive.
- LOTS of content. They update multiple times a week and have 100s of sets available.
- Good deal of public shots. This is what attracted me to the site. I like the premise of women getting naughty in public. About 20% of the shoots contain women flashing or being risky in public places.
- Diversity of models (sort of). Most of the models fit the mold of gorgeous early 20s beauty. They also include many other beautiful women, while certainly not catering to those tastes - beautiful women are appreciated in all their forms.
- Mostly natural. This site focus on beautiful women as they are. While some are "enhances" it's not typical
- Many amateurs, while I have seen some faces faces. Most are women I haven't seen a million times before |
| Cons: |
- Limited video content. Only a few sets have videos with them. Videos tend to be less than 5 minutes and tend to consist of dancing and "being silly"
- I'd like to see the addition of tags. It would be great if they were user editable. Right now you can comment and give feedback. It would be even better if users could help expand the search.
- Search is too broad "Black" returns models wearing black, african-american models and girls with black hair. |
| Bottom Line: |
"It is what it is". I'm a big fan of sites fulfilling their promises and not overselling. Zishy delivers exactly what it says it will. Software, beautiful women with high quality pictures.
I like that the sets (typically about 50 pictures in each) are high quality.
Sets are easy to download in zip format, again formatting and organization are clean and easy.
At the end of each set is a recommendation for other material you might like. I found it to be useful as I spent a lot of time using that to explore other models I enjoyed.
I was very satisfied with the value for my dollar. I let my membership lapse so I could enjoy some of what I already have. But I will definitely return. |
|
08-05-16 07:08am
Replies (2)
|
