| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
151
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
|
11-02-09 08:28pm
Replies (14)
|
Reply
152
|
Jenny's Handjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
pissedatporn's Review
4-5 days? Holy crap. I'd be near insane. However, I've often had the thought that porn would be much improved if the male performers came to the performances only after a considerable downtime. It might be harder for them to go very long but the action would be more intense and more genuine, and the finish more of a spectacle, rather than the usual dribble, which you eloquently refer to.
As for handjob porn, this is surely the way to go. Handjob porn with a dribble at the end is useless. I am tempted to check this out - but your review is lacking in certain technical details. What is the quality of the vids? I mean size, bitrate. How many are there? How long are they? Are there various DL options?
|
01-08-09 07:50pm
|
Reply
153
|
JJ1 Club
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hi jd,
The jumping-jack thing is extremely misleading and might be a reason why this site has gotten zero notice here. There are one or two flash animations of each model doing jumping jacks (usually one from the front, and one from the rear, that's it), but there are anywhere from thirty to a hundred animations for each model doing a variety of other things, so the jumping jacks is a tiny percentage of the total material on offer. I admit the premise sounds a bit silly, but I really like a lot of these animations. They're sort of like a gif, only much larger (screen-size wise) and with a longer range of movement that plays in a loop. I think of them as a picture with frills. I can't think of another site which offers these things, at least in this kind of quantity. It's unique, as far as I know.
The site is pretty much oriented towards the breast-man. And they're some of the best breasts going.
|
04-08-08 10:54am
|
Comment
154
|
JJ1 Club
(0)
|
|
04-07-08 10:13pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
155
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
I went through my first folder and didn't find any. Bear in mind, I have hundreds of zips, so this might take a while. I know I only downloaded a few since I generally peruse the set before taking the zip and when I found one of those, by and large I opted not to DL.
Until I rummage a few up, it might help if I tell you that these doubled sets - at least the ones I saw - ALL occurred in the old pages. I spent almost all my time in the regular amatuers section and athletic amateurs. I worked my way from oldest to newer since I prefer the style of the old sets (I'm an old-school undies fan). I don't recall any in exotics, and I never looked at outdoors, nor any hardcore.
Bear in mind, I wrote the initial comment in regard to this out of curiosity mainly and as a heads-up to you. It wasn't that big of a deal. As you can see by my review, basically your site is tops and I will be rejoining again in a few months to go through the newer stuff.
I will email with info when I can. Hopefully fairly soon.
|
10-29-08 10:07pm
|
Reply
156
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply. I will send you some of the set-names after I've located them, but I won't be able to send an URL because my sub has run out. **NOT fishing for any freebies here, either, nor would I accept any if offered. I'm weird about that sort of thing. Not that you would do that any way. I mention it just as an FYI.
|
10-28-08 01:45pm
|
Comment
157
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
10-28-08 10:23am
Replies (8)
|
Review
158
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge amount of content, both pics and vids.
- Zips for photosets.
- Search engine
- Model rating system, plus section for highest rated models and sets.
- Pics viewable in two sizes.
- Hard and softcore content separated.
- Several updates per week.
- Navigation is good. |
| Cons: |
- High-res pics offered but at 1500x1000 they are still a tad behind some high-end sites.
- Most softcore vids seem to begin with an interview/chat session, which is a negative for me. Would rather have interview sessions separate. This is a minor nit, of course. |
| Bottom Line: |
Karups HA is undoubtedly one of the best sites going, with amount of content vying with just about anyone at this point. To give you an idea of how much material there is here: in the softcore video section alone there are twenty-four vids per page, and there are seventy-one pages. The photo sections are just as impressive.
That aside, the site has all the bells & whistles one might expect at a premium site, which I listed in the cons. The drawing point for me is the photo archive. Though I could be wrong, it looks to me like a few well-known photographers had sets here in the old days: Toby from ATK, and Donovan Philips from DonnysGirls, to name two. If I'm wrong on this I'd be very surprised.
The newest vid I downloaded is 640x480 and shows a bitrate of 2683k. Newest pics come in at 1500x1000, which is nice, but 1600x1200 would be even better. Once again, a minor nit.
This is one of a small handful of sites which I have stayed with for a second month. Even with a fast connection it would take a long time to collect it all, and then you'd be very busy indeed.
Anyone interested in adult media would be remiss not to sign up here at least once. I seriously doubt that many people would find it terribly disappointing. |
|
10-20-08 09:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
159
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks for the response. As I mentioned, I loved the site when I was a member, and I see it's only gotten better in the few years since. I will probably be subscribing again very shortly!
Thanks again.
|
08-01-07 08:43pm
|
Comment
160
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
07-31-07 10:26pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
161
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Some of us quirky fellows actually like the ho-hum, practical underwear!
|
01-20-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
162
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
I second this. I spoke with the webmaster (or one of them?) via email regarding the zipped photo sets and it was like talking to an old friend. Remarkable customer service and a great site as well!
|
06-23-10 05:57pm
|
Reply
163
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks Wittyguy, and Jeff. I've just signed up at KarupsPC and am liking it a lot so far.
|
12-30-08 03:22am
|
Reply
164
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks, TheRizzo, for the quick reply.
|
12-29-08 06:40pm
|
Comment
165
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
12-29-08 05:39pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
166
|
LBFM
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A lot of material up. 100,000+ photos of 400+ models and over a thousand video clips (See cons about clips), some in HD. Newer pics go up to 1277x1920, but the majority of them are smaller, at around 960x1280 and lower.
- Attractive models.
- Navigation easy enough.
- Fairly regular updates. |
| Cons: |
- Much of the material seems to be non-exclusive. Saw most of their schoolgirl sets on Schoolgirls Asia (same company), and a lot of the sets featuring what appear to be Thai models have appeared elsewhere.
- No zipfiles.
- Vids come in small one-to-two minute clips, making them useless.
- Site has an amateurish look, not re the models, but the design. Ugly purplish background all through.
- Toy-obssessed.
- PU user mentions something about a DL limit. I wouldn't know because to DL one gig of video here in one day would border on masochism. |
| Bottom Line: |
Two major drawbacks to this site are the lack of zipfiles and the fact that the vids are broken into tiny bits. The ones I saw averaged at 5 megs. I'm sure the HD vids are much larger, but I didn't bother with them, since I can't play 1280 anyway.
First, the lack of zips is a deal-breaker here, since the photo sets are often very long and padded out with multiple shots offering hardly any variation. Don't let the high pic count fool you. Most sets could be trimmed by fifty percent without losing anything.
Second, there is no good reason to break up the videos into tiny bits, except to frustrate the customer and greatly diminish enjoyment of the site.
Also a problem here is the depressing feeling of looking at young ladies who are simply trying to earn money. I end up feeling sorry for them more often than not. There is virtually no personality or charm exuding from this material, at least from my perspective. My impression from what little HC I looked at is that the performers are merely doing a job. Passion seems to be zero.
I would recommend the site if 1) photo-sets were edited and more varied, and zipped; and 2) videos were offered whole instead of being broken up.
Unless you are really into South-east Asian models, I would say skip it. |
|
11-08-09 03:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
167
|
Lesbian Girl On Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Excellent review, lk2!
|
05-24-16 11:57pm
|
Review
168
|
Little April
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- April is very cute and is nice to look at in every way.
- Pic quality is decent: 803 by 1200
- "teeny" niche held to faithfully. |
| Cons: |
- The site is dead, and has been for a while.
- Only 40 pic sets, avg 36 pics
- 50 or so vid episodes broken into sections, some as short as one minute. Quality is fair to lousy and does no justice to this girl.
- Masturbation scenes are as uninspired as they are uninspiring, for those of you who might be into that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wanted to see what these teen-revenue sites were all about since I've been seeing these girls on TGPs for years. Hopefully I will do a review of each of them.
There is no point at all in joining April's site by itself, since if you like her you've probably collected most of the pics already. The vids will be of interest only to those who have an inordinate crush on April.
Impressions: April comes across as an innocent, decidedly non-trashy young lady who most likely did this to earn some money - which evidently she did and is still doing - and then moved on. She seemed semi-sleezy to me from the TGP pics only because I expected there to be harder content on her site which the free pics were only a teasing sample of (hey, if you can't end a sentence with a preposition on a porn-review site, where can you?).
Conclusions: As cute as she is, her pics have been floating around for so long, and the site has been inactive for so long, it seems a bit dishonest to sell it as a stand-alone site worth dropping twenty dollars on, which they are still doing despite the fact that her site is included in the teenrevenue network, which is all of ten bucks more.
The extras at April's site are negligible: Teenagepink, PrivateL TV, and Panties Down are little more than small archives of old and oft-circulated pics which have a mildewy smell about them, although there are a few gems among the rubble. |
|
11-19-07 10:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
169
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Reply
Hi JBDICK,
Thanks for the comment. I agree with your observation that Lupe doesn't seem entirely committed; but I think that observation is sort of in accord with my complaint about her looking into the camera while she's in the saddle: it makes it look too much like a performance? Just a thought. And yessiree, she does have beautiful eyes. My ex-wife is Hispanic and even though we've been divorced for over a year, she's still my main fantasy...
I've enjoyed your reviews here on PU.
WWW
|
04-10-08 10:58pm
|
Review
170
|
Little Lupe
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lupe is gorgeous
- Lots of content
- Large, good-quality pictures
- Decent quality videos
- Hardcore and softcore content |
| Cons: |
- Highly visible and intrusive watermark in pics
- pic sets are repetitive and predictable |
| Bottom Line: |
This is easily the best from the teenrevenue group of sites. Pics are plentiful and range from vid-caps to 1800x1200. Lupe looks great from any angle, and is about as modest as Bill Gates is poor.
Vids look good and range from teaser stuff to hardcore. Good quality offered though not top end: 640x480, 1100 kbps. There are app. 65 vids. Features some of the best girls-kissing suff I've ever seen (though there is not too much of it), as well as masturbation, BJ, and boy-girl.
One gripe about vids: why must Lupe stare into the camera while she's going at it? I've seen this a lot and I don' get it. It's as if to say, "See, look, I really am a horny little sexpot. See? Look what I can do..."
Lupe looks young but in my opinion it's not a problem. Look at some of the other girls in this network: they have them playing kid's games, even coloring in a coloring book for goodness' sake, in addition to all the other teeny-trappings. Lupe looks young but acts her age, in a manner of speaking, and I never felt creepy watching her stuff.
About the males in these clips, which the other reviewers mentioned: One of the things I hate about modern porn is that the guys look like street thugs and seem to hate women. In the clips I saw the guys looked pretty passive compared to some of the net-garbage I've seen. I only viewed about one third of the clips, however, so it could be the other reviewers are right. They are extremely well-endowed. That's certainly true. |
|
12-19-07 05:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
171
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
I notice that all of your reviews are this thorough, a least the ones I just checked. Very impressive.
|
11-16-09 10:54pm
|
Reply
172
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Wow. This is about the most thorough review I've seen here. Great job.
|
11-16-09 10:50pm
|
Reply
173
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Messmer,
Go to the site and click the "join" link. On the bottom left is the webmaster's email address. I'd post it here but I don't know if that's allowed.
Like I told you before, my memory is shot and it's been over a year since I was a member, and I don't remember if the sets were zipped. I do know that I don't have any saved. My bet is you'll get a prompt response.
|
01-17-09 07:45pm
|
Review
174
|
LV Panty
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding picture quality.
Complete fidelity to the niche.
Easy to navigate.
Models are (mostly) drop-dead gorgeous.
No degrading terminology.
Not "toy" obssessed.
No penises. |
| Cons: |
Video section is still fairly small.
Image sets are a bit predictable and similar.
Too much emphasis on close-ups, but this is probably a good thing for others. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a mature site for picture lovers and panty connoisseurs, though perhaps it isn't as popular as some other sites in this niche because, while it features young ladies (18+) it doesn't have that teeny-bopper/schoolgirl atmosphere so typical to this kind of site. The sets are polished and professional and tend toward the artistic rather than the merely titillating. The models are beautiful and varied, though I would prefer more exotics. I think the general same-ness of the sets could be leavened with shots that are more relaxed and spontaneous rather than posed, and I would prefer less emphasis on close-ups. While those shots are fine, they tend to get over-familiar over the long-haul. The variety of panty styles is very good, and I'm pleased to see that thongs are NOT all the rage here. This site will make the old-schoolers happy, I think, because, after-all, thongs are for your feet. |
|
06-03-07 11:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
175
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Thanks for the heads up, messmer.
|
12-12-08 03:08pm
|
|
