| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, it was Epoch. Site replied to my query with automated response. Real response should be in a few days.
Another lovely thing: On their contact page, you get a form-email to fill out, and then you have to answer the question in the box to prove you're human. So far so good. The question was "58 - 7 = ?" I entered 51, and was told this was the "wrong capture, please go back".
Had to finally re-open the page, re-type email, and answer the new question. This was "93 + 8 = ?" This time my amazing mathematical skills were successful!
Oh, and by the way, the naughty bits (vag, at least) are blurred out even in the pictures here, at least with the older sets, which is thus far all I've looked at. I thought this was only with the videos.
|
09-24-09 04:31am
|
Comment
127
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
|
09-24-09 02:57am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
128
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
A few things:
mbaya: When you say "miss tease", I don't quite understand, since what you seem to be saying is that the site is *too* long on the tease factor and too little on what you call the 'interesting action'. Was there a typo? Most likely I just didn't get what you were saying.
Yes, I certainly agree that the gyno aspect of the site is overdone, BUT - their mission statement plainly tells the prospective customer what to expect, so, it is what it is. I'm not disputing you, or trying to argue for the sake of argument (I HATE that!), just basically agreeing and reiterating things (because I like to type!).
Unfortunately, my review left a few things out, and these are big things, so I need to add:
PROS
- The male presence is virtually non-existent on this site, and even when so much as a male hand will be in the video, the customer is warned beforehand (pun intended). I think this is a cardinal virtue, and should be applauded, and copied on other sites of this nature. Since this site isn't about sex between men and women, but about the adulation and worship (literally) of the beauty and - what used to be - the mystery, of adult females, the customer is NOT interested in seeing or hearing another male. The people behind this site understand this and the total absence of the male voice and male presence is intentional and adhered to religiously.
- The absence of silly music, which I mentioned, is of UTMOST value and importance on a site of this nature. We have FIVE senses, and we can interact with the models here via TWO of those five: seeing and hearing. We can't touch, taste, or smell them (but in time we'll be able to do something like that in a "virtual" sense). Hence the utter silliness of sites that put a music track to their videos, which effectively reduces our real contact with the models by blotting out the sounds generated by the model: her footsteps, the rustle of her clothing, her breath, her utterances, and whatever other blesséd noises that come from her body. I refuse to pay even a cent for a site that offers video content of models posing and stripping if there is a music track. It almost destroys the experience for me. Music is an art. Worshipping a woman in the privacy of my cave is not an art, and I don't want art while I'm worshipping a woman.
- There is nothing but complete respect for the dignity of these models as individuals, as human beings. Yes, they are being objectified here, but they are being well-paid, and these girls know the deal. The site should be applauded and copied by other sites in that they DO NOT refer to women as sluts, bitches, whores, or any of those dehumanizing terms, and the site does not belittle the models or speak of them as anything other than the equals of the men behind the cameras and the consumers. There is a strong sense that these models are well paid, respected, and above all, SAFE, while they do their work for ITC.
- If I think of something I left out, I'll return.
|
09-15-15 06:09pm
|
Review
129
|
In The Crack
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Outstandingly beautiful models.
- Gigantic, colossal, mammoth (see thesaurus for more) amount of content. Site has been active since 2001.
- Fidelity to what they do. I don't know of any other site that has started with a mission and stuck to it as unwaveringly as ITC. My last join was in 2008 and even their front page has remained the same. Pristine, expedient, and efficient.
- Highest quality video, streaming and download. Dimensions offered for the latest vids are up to 3840 x 2160 at 3043 MB. When I click on this option, I get this message:
"The demands of 4k video (3840x2160) are very high. This technology is somewhat ahead of it's time and the great majority of viewers will not be able to play it..."
So I take the 1920x1080, which is crystal clear for me. I think I'd need a better pair of eyes to even be remotely interested in viewing the higher def vids.
- Zips for all pic sets. Dimensions are 1800x2400. Plenty big enough, unless we're in a biology lab.
-No crappy music! |
| Cons: |
I was going to give the site a 99, but thought about it, and decided an 89 was more correct, because despite the fact that I think it's one of the best sites available for the kind of entertainment it provides, it could "improve" I think by stretching its horizons and being more creative. I suggest having the models DOING something more often, rather than just shuffling and clicking about on their heels on those amazing floors, or in those incredible outdoor environments. I dunno: do some cleaning, dishes, paint the walls, change a light bulb, rearrange a book shelf, fold some laundry, change a tire, make a Quiche Lorraine, hang some drapes, prune a palm tree, write a libretto, paint a picture, hang pictures, dust, write some memos, iron some shirts, do some plumbing, install a battery, clean the pool, split an atom — Something, besides just swiveling, swaying, sashaying and making me feel like a creep while I stare at every inch of their perfectly lovely beautiful girly bodies. |
| Bottom Line: |
35 USD for a month's access to all this content is highway robbery. And what I mean by that is, we are robbing THEM. If you have an up-to-date machine or device, you can get 35 dollars worth of adult entertainment here in about a few minutes.
It would be fair if they said, "look, you give us the 35 clams, and you get 24 hours to take what you can from us, then you're done. You want more, you gotta pony up some more dough."
In 24 hours, with a good connection and/or PC or device, you could get, in one day, what you would have paid thousands of dollars for not that long ago.
My personal, subjective score for this site would be a 100, but I don't think that would fly with the owners of THIS site, or with my fellow PUsers. The 89 is my objective score, since I actually DO think they could be more imaginative and get the models to do other stuff besides what they currently do.
My bottom, bottom line is: this is the best value on the Internet that I know of for the kind of content that I like. My downloading speeds have been ridiculously fast, and I've had no problems at all. |
|
09-14-15 11:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
130
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Comment
Yes that's the dimensions of their large sized pics. I must be old, but this size is ridiculously huge enough for me. I can count the hair follicles on any square millimeter of a model's lovely bits. What else do I need?
|
09-14-15 10:24pm
|
Reply
131
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I agree, williamj. I'm amazed by many things at this site, the models as well as the high-end, luxurious sets. There's sometimes so much ornament, color, and detail that it's like Ridley Scott decided to direct some soft porn for a change of pace.
And I can't say too much about the silence factor: no music, ZERO blather from the cameraman, and precious little from the model.
Oh, and they seem to be holding the camera much steadier than a few years ago!
|
02-09-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
132
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I don't have a Comcast connection, I have a cable connection. I never heard of Comcast before this thread.
|
02-09-10 12:29pm
|
Reply
133
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
You mean, I presume, that the DL came in at 2,200kb a second? Holy crap, that's more than three times as fast as my optimal speed, which is around 700k a sec. I thought I had a reasonably fast connection. Yikes.
Oh, and by the way, the downloads have been okay for me recently, ranging from 300 to 700k.
|
01-27-10 08:39pm
|
Reply
134
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ok, disabled it.
File coming in at around 600k with AVG disabled, without download manager (I've never used one), which is on the high end of what I typically get.
|
01-12-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
135
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I will try as you suggest, RB, and let you know how it went.
edit: OK, how do you disable AVG?
|
01-12-10 12:51pm
|
Comment
136
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
01-10-10 08:33pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
137
|
In The Crack
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of content available.
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.
- Detailed descriptions for each video.
- No DRM.
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set. |
| Cons: |
- Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.
- That "fish-eye" lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell. |
| Bottom Line: |
Ever imagine what it might be like to have Eve Angel park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.
While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and Eve Angel wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.
As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you.
I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of Eve Angel winking at me on my desktop.
You can see her eyes too. |
|
07-18-08 03:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
138
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
07-04-08 11:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
139
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Thanks for the good review, Davit. This one is on my short list and most likely I'll be signing up very soon. Since acquiring a 22 inch monitor I've had a yen for huge, clear pics. Since I can't have these beautiful women actually use my face as a chair, this might be the next best thing. ;)
|
03-06-08 04:30pm
|
Reply
140
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
While there is a good mix of fully clothed and fully nude, the photo-sets are frequently non-linear and feature the model in various modes of dress and undress. So no, you will not get the full strip from start to finish. Also bear in mind, the genitalia is blurred in most of the main photo sets, although the pubic hair is not.
In my opinion the JAV models are hands down the most beautiful in the world.
|
06-18-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
141
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
I certainly didn't mean to be stepping on your toes either. Sorry if I came across as bothered or in any way upset with your comments.
And I do agree with you about the videos. More variety would be more than welcome and we should voice our opinions as we see fit.
Peace and goodwill to all!
|
01-10-10 08:28pm
|
Reply
142
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
My high rating for this site came from the outstanding beauty of the models and the high quality photo sets. I kept only a handful of videos, and more than likely I won't view them again. But then again, watching people fuck bores me to tears anyway.
That being said, I think Japanese porn in general has a higher level of eroticism than most other sources.
|
01-08-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
143
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I agree with a lot that you said, particularly in regard to the videos. However, I wonder if you looked into the Gravure photo section and archives? Most of the sets there are glamour/softcore, and of prime, top-notch quality. There is also a way-softcore section featuring bikinis and such, called "Buru Buru" if memory serves. The amateur section as well as the Urabon section are HC, although there are plenty of nice solo pics in the amateur sets. (I mention this in response to your list of cons, second one from the top)
I didn't pay much attention to the videos, after a brief infatuation with Maria Ozawa. And I agree there needs to be MUCH more variety in that category, especially since most people will be signing up for the videos.
Otherwise, great review. My initial excitement over this site waned significantly over time, although I still believe the JAV models are the most beautiful creatures on the planet.
|
12-20-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
144
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
I neglected to mention: there are many uncensored hardcore vids up for offer here, 15 pages, 12 vids per page, average length seems to be about an hour and a half. Also, the Urabon archive is uncensored.
|
11-14-09 09:06pm
|
Review
145
|
J Sex Network
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-18-09 09:13pm (Update History)
Reason: Lowered score one point. They need to zip more of the sets.
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous models, with very few exceptions.
- Excellent photo archives with highly professional, polished sets, ranging from cutesy to glamorous.
- Tons of full-length hardcore videos, offered in single files, often with a choice of servers.
- Many sets are zipped, but most aren't.
- Search function is serviceable.
- Navigation is okay, but could be improved.
- Large Urabon photobook archive.
- Large amateur photo archive.
- Large cosplay/panty-fetish archive, some 10,000 pics.
- Several nice softcore vids, but wish there were more.
- Updates come at a good pace.
- AV models are pure class, from head to toe. Very few tats, very few fake breasts.
- The photography is sometimes sublime, and the photogs deserve special notice here. |
| Cons: |
- Material is not exclusive. Saw a few Graphis watermarks, and many sets were at Idols69.
- Mosaics in vids and photos. I did not take away from the score because of this, as it's a legal issue in Japan, but mention it because some, if not most, regard it as a serious negative, and I must admit it is a bother in videos.
- Photo archive navigation could be improved, made uniform. There are too many formats, and often, with only a forward arrow to guide you, you have no idea how long the set will go.
- A few more strip/tease vids would be nice, to leaven all that hardcore.
- Download limit. Though I can't imagine why 15 gigs would not be enough for a single day. |
| Bottom Line: |
Obviously the mosaics are going to be a problem for many people here. It's been discussed at length at PU and for the most part I side with jd1961 that since it's the law in Japan it would be pointless to hold it against them. That being said, I find the HC vids are a bit bothersome to watch at times, though the eroticism is usually still very high.
It deserves mention that the Japanese seem to be keen on the reverse gang-bang theme, which I find very erotic. There is one vid featuring ONE male with ONE HUNDRED women. Holy crap. If that isn't a fantasy to reckon with, I don't know what is.
The pics are censored at this site also, but I don't find this a problem. The models are spectacular and the sets are varied and beautiful to look at, even if they aren't always titillating; but oftentimes the girls are so stunning - and the sets and wardrobe so high-class - it's exciting just to see them naked.
Besides, some of these JAV models are like higher life forms to me. I realize this is totally subjective.
Pic quality and size vary to a great degree. Some are small, as in the Urabon and Amateur pics, and some of the Gravure pics are big, up to 2000+ on the big side, though these seem to be fairly rare.
I don't care for hardcore porn, but I took a few of the uncensored Maria Ozawa vids and was surprised that I could watch and enjoy them. The eroticism was high and the sex was sensual and non-aggressive, though I will admit that a great deal of the other videos here seem to veer quite decidedly towards the darker, or simply weirder, side of sex and sexuality.
Most of the vids here seem to be 640x480, so we're not talking HD, but they look very good to me. Bitrates must be higher than what the Windows info-balloons are telling me.
Thus far I'm having a great time, and this is one of my all-time favorite sites. My staggered first-impressions have been tempered quite a bit, but I'm still impressed, and I'm far from bored. If I wasn't so in love with Japanese models I would probably not be as happy here as I am, so bear that in mind.
I **highly** recommend this site to anyone who likes JAV models, but if you have a problem with mosaics, don't join. The only reason I didn't give this a score in the high 90's is because of the fact that the material is non-exclusive, and because of minor nav issues. |
|
11-14-09 08:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
146
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Consider me warned, jd, and thanks.
|
11-08-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
147
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
You are correct, it's French-Canadian. I haven't been able to enjoy hardcore for years, until I saw her work at JSex. I think she's the most beautiful, most sensual woman who does this for a living; and if Wikipedia is correct, she actively sought this career out.
I will check into Graphis. Thanks for the suggestion, and for the link, Khan.
My review for JSex will be up in a few days, I hope. I'm still exploring the site. And the weird thing is, I've discovered a few things in the search that I wouldn't have found just by cruising through the sections: such as a cosplay/panty-fetish section with over 10,000 pics. Yikes.
|
11-07-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
148
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Speaking of Maria Ozawa: My God, what a beautiful girl! Japanese and French is it? I don't usually go for hardcore but I downloaded an uncensored Ozawa vid called "Soap" or something like that, and I found it amazingly erotic. That was one lucky bastard, in the first scene. It's not fair! It's not fair!
It's not fair!!
|
11-04-09 09:55pm
|
Reply
149
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
jd,
Thanks very much. The Sabra vids are very nice, at least the three I've taken so far. I still can't believe how beautiful these girls are. Also thanks for the log-in help.
This may be the only site I actually remain a member of for more than two or three months.
|
11-04-09 09:50pm
|
Reply
150
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
mbaya,
Just bear in mind how subjective it all is when it comes to taste in women, and in sites like this in general. I was married to a beautiful, petite Mexican woman for ten years and I will forever be smitten by petite exotics with dark eyes and dark hair.
That being said, there is a wealth of pics and vids here, most of excellent quality. I can't imagine you being too disappointed.
|
11-03-09 02:50pm
|
|
