Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : WeeWillyWinky (0)  

Feedback:   All (280)  |   Reviews (46)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (198)

Other:   Replies Received (206)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 176-200 of 281 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
176
Visit Mature Erotic

Mature Erotic
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

I've been looking at this one too, so I'll be checking back to see if someone answers. The webmaster responded to someone else's comment hereabouts.

12-09-08  11:21pm

Comment
177
Visit Monster Pimps

Monster Pimps
(0)

Clarifications

Sometimes when I do a review I forget that most people are much more into video than pictures, so when I say the site is not for the hardcore fan, I am mainly refering to the picture content. The video sites at this network fall into the hardcore category, particularly Lipstick BJ and Exploited Secretaries, but the amount of vids at either site is still pretty small and the content is not extreme in any sense. Panty Jobs is more tease oriented, but still hardcore by definition, I suppose.

The picture sites at this network are pretty decidedly softcore despite some stronger material. Bottom line is, I wouldn't recommend this site to someone who is primarily interested in hardcore video.

01-24-08  09:03pm

Replies (0)
Review
178
Visit Monster Pimps

Monster Pimps
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots and lots of material, both pics and vids.
- Zip-files for a large portion of newer sets (this must be new seeing as exotics4me said there were no zips in his review).
- Wide range of very attractive models, including some well-knowns.
- Video quality is excellent in the primary video sites (Panty-Jobs, Lipstick BJ, and Exploited Secretaries).
Cons: - Terrible name for this network, and doesn't jibe with the largely softcore content. Monster Pimps sounds like something a rip-off site would call itself.
- Pics could be larger, and there are a fair portion of really small pics (400x600). But this is an old site so this is to be expected.
- Site is loaded with video-feed junk (which they do not need) and advertisements.
- Navigation is workable but you can miss a lot of stuff (mostly pic sets) if you don't poke around a bit. This network has three times the material I originally thought it did in my first few days.
Bottom Line: Quite frankly, this site contains some of the best softcore picture sets in the cheerleader/panty niche that I've encountered. Lamentably, the pics are smallish to very small. The big ones are 684x1024, but many are as small as 400x600. The models are cute to drop-dead gorgeous, and the sets are not toy-obssessed. Whoever is behind the site knows what panty-afficianados want to see.

As exotics4me says, the Panty-job videos are interesting and definitely not something you see everywhere else. My only issue with these vids concerns one of the male performers, who often can't even get it up and who produces some truly pitiful money-shots. Come on, if you're gonna make a girl work that hard for fifteen to twenty minutes, these sessions should end with a bang, not a whimper (to steal a line from the poet, T.S. Eliot).

If the pics were larger I would consider this network to be in the top five percentile for the softcore/cheerleader/panty niche. It's definitely NOT for the hardcore fan or the toy-fanatic. If it were up to me, I would convert this network into one big site and implement a good search function so one can easily locate all the material for each particular model, and I'd put the dinky pics in a separate archive.

01-24-08  01:54am

Replies (1)
Review
179
Visit My Cute Teens

My Cute Teens
(0)

73.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of content up.
- Decent mix of cute European models.
- Seems to update regularly.
Cons: - No zips.
- Majority of pics in photo sets are named identically: "DSCN0001- etc.", causing extra work re-naming.
- Many vids are not high quality, some very low quality.
- Site has a very "generic" feel to it.
Bottom Line: I guess somebody ought to do a review for sites like this, though it's easy to see why no-one here has ventured to do one thus far.

I have no complaints about the amount of material on offer here. There are loads of pic sets (60+ pages with app. 10 sets per page), and app. 120 vids. Some of the vids are broken up into sections.

There are some very good photo sets here, if one is willing to look for them. Pic size varies: 1200x1600 on the high end, 1000x750 on the medium, plus many sets with smaller pics. There are also some high quality vids, 2000+k, 640x480, but the bitrates go as low as 359k in the older vids.

The problem here is organization. While the pic and vid sections are separate, hard and softcore content is mixed together in both, and there are no search options. Pictures are divided in two sections, "exclusive" and "other". Sets come ten per page with a thumbnail link and a brief description. The vid section offers a long list of text links, each link being a brief description which takes you to a thumbnail giving some idea of the content, and there is only one option available for DL. The content of the videos left no impression on me. Same old-same old.

By and large this site will induce boredom almost instantly. It has a strong generic stamp and possesses no real personality or any defining characterisic apart from its "teeny-ness" which is strongly reminiscent of Club Seventeen and other euro sites. It comes with the usual plethora of bonus feeds which add nothing to its value.

Spend your money elsewhere.

10-13-08  09:52pm

Replies (0)
Reply
180
Visit Nadine Jansen

Nadine Jansen
(0)
Reply of xyzzy's Review

Good review xyzzy, thanks. I've been tempted many times to join.

01-16-09  09:45am

Reply
181
Visit Naughty Mag

Naughty Mag
(0)
Reply of Capn's Reply

Hi Capn,

Thanks for the trust vote and for all the replies. Now, if I can answer your question:

It has been a long while since I've been to the site, and I should stress that I NEVER download hardcore picture sets. They bore me to tears. I've taken a few b/g stills featuring a model I like, or if the pic in interesting in other ways, but I've never downloaded a complete set. So, when I look at what I collected from Naughty Mag, all I have are solo-model sets and a handful of videos. The vids were all yawnfests, except for a scant few. The solo sets were very good, as far as I'm concerned, because they were well-edited, didn't use dozens of shots with no noticeable change in pose, and because they featured undies which I like: more towards full-cut, full-back as opposed to thongs and "sexy" stuff. Mind you, I am an archive-miner, as I like the way they did things back in the late ninetees, early oughts. I can't comment on newer sets since I didn't focus much on them. I would imagine they have caught up with the modern trends just like ATK and the like.

If memory serves, there was the usual amount of toy/masturbation stuff, as well as lots of hardcore, but I honestly cannot say what the ratio would be between hard and soft. Sorry. It's been too long and I was there for the archives.


09-12-09  08:38pm

Review
182
Visit Naughty Mag

Naughty Mag
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons: - Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line: Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.

While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.

The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.

I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.

It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.

04-07-08  11:20pm

Replies (3)
Reply
183
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

That's truly a shame. I was planning on going back to Nubiles soon. I am so sick of the masturbation/dildo stuff, in fact it's one of the reasons I stayed away from PU for a while: I feel so out of the loop. For some reason, watching a girl masturbate does nothing for me. I know this is not the norm, but what can I say? It bores the shit out of me.

07-02-09  11:11pm

Review
184
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful, beautiful girls.
- Tons and tons of content, updated regularly.
- Good quality video, numerous DL options.
- Exhaustive browse features
- Decent search function (could be better)
- Options for member involvement.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Niched galleries of each model: ass, breasts, legs.
- a few super-sized pics for each model, wallpapers
- Zips in small or large size.
- Bonus sites, and these accrue with long-term membership, and they aren't just the usual bullshit.
- Search lets you sift softcore from hard.
- What the hell else do you want?
Cons: - Model's directory is all laid out on one page and this seems counter-productive, as it sometimes takes a good while to load and because, let's say you want to start with the Z's: I bet you can't scroll all the way down to the bottom without being smitten by some ridiculously cute girl along the way. Try it. Go 'head.
- I would like to be able to search by letter, as in ATK and other places. You can search by model name, but what good is that unless you already know which girl you're looking for?
- Alexis doesn't allow pm's. Doesn't she love me?
Bottom Line: Though the content isn't absolutely to my tastes (my tastes are admittedly way out of fashion), I can still be objective and say that Nubiles is among a small handful of sites which are truly head and shoulders above the rest in every way. I ran out of room in the pros section and had to edit it. The nits are minor.

03-04-08  12:11am

Replies (1)
Reply
185
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

The model Alexis is worth the admission price alone. She flabbergasts me. I mean, my gast is completely flabbered.

02-21-08  09:06pm

Reply
186
Visit Oh La La Glamour Girls

Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Ok, UK Upskirts links to both sites, to UK Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the UK part, and to Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the Upskirts part. Same thing with the Amateur Upskirts link.

Very strange. Or my computer is going crazy. Or I'm an idiot. Is this normal for links to function this way?


07-14-08  10:58pm

Reply
187
Visit Oh La La Glamour Girls

Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Here's the link to the UK Up-skirts site

https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/


07-14-08  10:45pm

Reply
188
Visit Oh La La Glamour Girls

Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Review

Hi messmer,

I can't think of anything off the top of my head that would fit the bill.

UK Upskirts, as well as most of the sites from that company, has very high quality videos, but there is no nudity. Also the pics are smallish. Amateur Upskirts has plenty of nudity but is heavy on the cotton, which I know you don't like, and the last time I was there the vids were just not up to par quality-wise and the pics were tiny. Panties Pulled Down is not upskirt-focused but has lots of upskirt material and plenty of nudity, but while the Quicktime vids are top-notch quality-wise the content is masturbation-obssessed and hence boring to me. And the pics there are great but are just too small to get excited about. LV Panty has big, HQ pic sets which you might like, as they always end in nudity and are not fixated on cotton, but the vid section is less than mediocre, or at least it was the last time I checked.

Like you, I have a next to impossible time finding stuff that is completely up my alley. Good luck hunting!

Edited: the site UK Upskirts links to IS NOT UK Upskirts....
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/


07-14-08  10:38pm

Review
189
Visit Oh La La Glamour Girls

Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of content, pics and video-wise
- Sharp, polished pictures, good-sized.
- Vids are above-average quality, new ones are top-notch.
- Navigation is a breeze, except for the tiny type.
- Very classy site.
- Models are good-looking to absolutely stunning.
- Almost fasitious fidelity to the niche.
Cons: - Need more variety in photo-sets
- Super-sized photos are too few and far between, and you'll have to guess which ones they are.
- Zero nudity. This can be a pro, depending on your frame of mind.
- No model directory, no search functions.
Bottom Line: This is one of the classiest tease/lingerie/glamour sites going. "Village Ladies" this IS NOT, as most of the models are stunners. There are a few models here which had me shaking my head and picking my slack-jaw up from the desk.

The pics range from mild teaser shots to the girl spread-eagled with panties on but nonetheless proving without a shadow of a doubt that she's female. Lovers of stockings, panties, high heels, satin and lace, will love it here. Hardcore fans, or people who like to see women degraded, will HATE it.

As far as atmosphere, this is the exact opposite of anything "street" oriented. Getting a teasing glimpse of some of these women is about as much as a guy like me deserves. Open a bottle of Apricot brandy, light up a Dunhill, and enjoy yourself.

09-23-07  09:35pm

Replies (6)
Reply
190
Visit Old Spunkers

Old Spunkers
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Top-notch review, messmer.

In regard to the site's title: I would never even wind up at the welcome page of a site with a name like that. I ended up subscribing at one site, or network, more correctly, with a real dud of a name because of a rewiew here. It's called Monster Pimps. The network is very docile and tame and is mostly about softcore shots of cheerleaders, with a few mild HC sites. Monster Pimps sounds like the EXACT opposite of that. Old Spunkers makes me think of gray-haired retirees at a Pinocle table suddenly feeling an itch in the diapers.

**No dis-respect to aged persons intended.


11-14-08  12:47pm

Reply
191
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
Reply of MikeC's Reply

MikeC, Thank you VERY much! I think I have to try this site, as it seems like it's tailor-made for me. I won't mind if some of the vids have music, but I'm glad to know that all of them don't. I will pick and choose from their giant archive, and I'll get my money's worth.

Your help is MOST appreciated! Thank you!


10-26-15  10:09pm

Reply
192
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Comment

Nevermind. I see it's Epoch, not CCBill. No dice. :(

10-15-15  05:26pm

Comment
193
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)

Music tracks?

I know sometimes there are music tracks to a trailer video when the actual videos are silent. In the sample vids here there is a music track. Can anyone tell me: do the videos at these sites have music to them? Or are they silent, as in just ambient sounds? Or is it a mixed bag? I would like to try this site at long last, but won't if the majority of videos contain a music track.

10-15-15  05:19pm

Replies (3)
Reply
194
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review

Great review, Cybertoad. But one question. You said 800 *pics" zipped, did you mean 800 "sets"? 800 pics seems pretty chintzy.

11-14-08  12:52pm

Reply
195
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

Thanks for the review, e4me. I've been meaning to check this place out. It's on the short list now.

04-14-08  10:37pm

Reply
196
Visit Panties Pulled Down

Panties Pulled Down
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Review

Should have done this long ago, but those initial problems were taken care of and I had no further difficulties with this site. WWW 5/26/11

05-26-11  02:18pm

Reply
197
Visit Panties Pulled Down

Panties Pulled Down
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Review

OK now I'm a little miffed. I've come back to the site today and I still can't download the zips. Hmmm... This is silly. They've already got my 30 day sub. Why make it hard for me to get what I want? Silly.

09-16-10  04:55pm

Review
198
Visit Panties Pulled Down

Panties Pulled Down
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Zipfiles for photo-sets
- Very faithful to the panty niche
- Mostly attractive, maturish-looking models in solo strip and faux-lesbian sets, office-girl and college-girl uniform.
- Decent amount of content, fast loading, good speeds.
- Sets are well edited and usually go from full-clothed to total nudity.
- Not too heavy on toys.
- Search utility offered, but is strange and I didn't use it.
- Model list.
- Seem to update pretty steadily.
- 2 options for vid download: WMV or Ipod.
Cons: - Daily limit for downloading zips. The first time I've encountered this. I didn't count but I did not download many before I was cut off. I am not aware of a limit for videos. I took quite a bit and was not cut off. Will update if this changes.
- Smallish pics for 2010: 803x1200.
- Videos are advertised as HD, when this is NOT the case. Vids ranged from 768x576 to 960x540, 1000 to 3000kb.
- Vids are limited in scope. Girl teases and talks to camera, winds up masturbating, tugging and playing with panties, same old same old.
Bottom Line: I have two scores for this site: my objective score is the one I posted. Subjectively, I would give this site a 95 for photo content alone, even though the vids are negligible.

I have a wicked, unstoppable panty fetish, and I tend to like old school knickers: full-sized, full-back, cotton, nylon. This site is HEAVY on cotton, and HEAVY on white cotton. So Messmer, bear that in mind! Over the past couple years they have moved towards more modern, "sexy" panties, like thongs, g-strings, lacy things, satiny things. This is not so good for me but may be great for others. The farther back you go through the archives, the more into white cotton and granny-ish style undies you get.

For the bra-lover, who should exist in all of us to some extent, there are some lovely bras here, and some lovely things that go inside the bras, though there is also a near-toxic level of silicone. The Brits seem to be really, really into fake breasts.

I gave this site a low score because I don't want to mislead my PU friends, and I try to keep my personal kinks and preferences in check, realizing that most men cannot stand the kind of skivvies I like; realizing that most men hold them up as objects of contempt and ridicule.

That being said, kudos must be given to the photogs and the editors of these sets. They are very well presented and offer choice views of the precious undergarments in question. Shame on them for not moving into higher res photos, however. I don't need gigantic pics, but at least fill my screen here in 2010.

Those concerned about nudity: this is NOT a non-nude site. Nudity and graphic views of the generative organs are in most sets, though this is NOT Simonscans or In the Crack either.

Subjectively speaking: Panties Pulled Down is my favorite site for panty photo content. Objectively speaking, DO NOT spend your money here if the sight of white cotton panties turns you off. You will be sorely disappointed, and maybe even angry.

And do not come here for video content. It's hum-drum in that regard.

09-16-10  04:16pm

Replies (2)
Reply
199
Visit Panties Pulled Down

Panties Pulled Down
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

It's gonna be a little while: gonna wait till my Panty Amateur sub runs out. Few weeks tops.

07-24-10  08:04pm

Comment
200
Visit Panties Pulled Down

Panties Pulled Down
(0)

Undeservedly obscure panty-site

Just wanted to mention that this is probably one of the best panty-sites out there. That is, IF you are into more mature models and can appreciate a tendency towards more conventional drawers (though they do seem to be including racier skivvies now). I was a member here before I joined PU and will join soon again to give a full review.

I do remember the negatives were: vids were only in Quicktime format, though I believe this is no longer the case; and photos were on the small side. I hope the site has grown and improved in my absence. I'll let you know soon.

07-21-10  02:33pm

Replies (3)

Shown : 176-200 of 281 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.31 seconds.