Nude Photography Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. MetArt (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequent updates, 4 per day, with an extra 2 updates on the first of each month.
The women are gorgeous.
Tech and billing support is outstanding.
Navigation is extremely good, you can make ratings or favorites and leave comments.
Huge catalog – 4,888 models, 312 artists, 28,888 photo galleries, 2,280 videos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the commenters get annoying when they complain about not enough pussy shots. They need to learn that a woman is more than just the stuff that surrounds a vagina.
Because of the complaining mentioned above, recent years have focused more on pussy shots, with the girls contorting themselves into strange positions to grant the desired view.
This is a softcore or glamcore site, so you are getting very little beyond close-ups (which are not in every scene) |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve already reviewed a number of sites in the MetArt network, but surprisingly I’ve never reviewed the flagship site. So here’s my take.
If you like looking at beautiful, naked women, this is the site for you. Everything about this site is excellent. The women are beautiful, the photography and videography are high quality, navigation is good, tech support is good. All softcore sites should aspire to be like this one.
Ladies with the most appearances: Suzanna A (139), Candice B (100), Zelda B (85), Anna AJ (82), Clarice (81), Sybil A (81), Sapphira A (79), Mia Sollis (79), Nikia A (77), Sharon E (74). The latest videos are available in 4K, the oldest (from 2000) Top out at 360p SD. For photos, the largest top out at 6720 on the long end.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
NOTE: RABBITS REVIEWS IS CURRENTLY OFFERING A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP FOR $199. I paid $500 for my lifetime membership in 2017 and couldn’t be happier with it.
Regular pricing for MetArt is $29.99 per month. The standard PU discount is usually $19.99 per month. During the holiday season they are offering a $9.99 special, and that will almost certainly be offered again during major holidays. Over on RR the special price as of today is $5.00 per month. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Restrained Elegance (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Engaging and desolate at the same time
+ Every scene and photo set is different
+ Well-trained actresses – believable
+ The models are attractive physically and mentally
+ You will not likely ever find content like this on other sites
+ Everything is exclusive to the site
+ Unique experience which is rare in porn |
| Cons: |
- While there are frequent updates, some are just older scenes that were archived
- Non-BDSM fans or newcomers might not enjoy the humiliation |
| Bottom Line: |
There seems to be many phases of BDSM in porn. Mainstream BDSM can be entertaining, but is rarely convincing. Some sites then take the violence and degradation to every extreme possible. Restrained Elegance does an exceptional job of not only living up to their name, but exemplifying it.
The videos are good at pushing close to an extreme but not quite reaching extremes. The actresses are clearly into BDSM and not just because the site wants to try BDSM scenes. I do believe the BDSM actresses are just like any fetishist and they are highly capable of delivering a performance matching their passion and interest in BDSM.
With that said, Restrained Elegance is not like the typical porn site. There are updates and some of the updates are just older scenes they have archived. There is a full explanation on their site that explains it would not be cost-effective to them to store all the scenes to be downloaded and streamed. I am not technical-savvy enough to know how realistic that is, but the way the site updates does not bother me in a negative way.
I do believe some of the humiliation could be stronger than most porn fans are used to, but I believe fans are getting smarter and more understanding about fetishes. There is an audience and room for new audience members. It just could be off-putting for some. One thing I appreciate about Restrained Elegance is you will never see a model look like she hates what is happening or like she does not want it to happen. This is a fine line that I believe separates Restrained Elegance from other BDSM sites.
The pictures are a major part of the site. These picture sets can be downloaded and show everything from the beauty of the models to the bondage contraptions in still photography. There are stories being told in both the pictures and videos. It truly makes for a unique experience in the BDSM genre. The videos are HD quality when downloaded and are enjoyable if you are into BDSM.
The site itself is a bare-bones site. Depending on the user, that can be good or indifferent. The site does make me feel like they are more dependent on the quality of the content than bells and whistles. Though, bells and whistles may show up as bondage accessories.
I do consider myself a BDSM fan and join this site about once a year. If you really like the content, a more frequent subscription could be the choice for you since it will open up more of the archived sets to you. Did I miss on making the analogy of the name Restrained Elegance in comparison to the way they update with archived scenes, kind of restrained but the scenes are always elegant.
It is a very good site. The biggest complaint against it is you do not get all their scenes. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Stunning 18 (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent. |
| Cons: |
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
