Nude Photography Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Femjoy (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – 10,000+ photo galleries, 800+ videos, nearly 2,000 models
Daily updates, sometimes a couple extra each week. 1 video each week
They replaced their more-annoying-than-most captcha with what looks like a Cloudflare to show you are human. I use Firefox for my browser and have never had an issue with this.
The site is quite stable and download speeds are solid. |
| Cons: |
Still some technical glitches, although much better than for the review I wrote a while ago. Several models have no thumbnail on the model page, even though all their sets and videos appear to be fine.
I don’t think they have any videos in 4K, which is fine with me as I usually download at 720, but that could be a drawback for some of you. All the more recent videos have at least 1080 as an option |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2017. It hasn’t really changed that much since then, except for adding many more photos, videos and models since that time.
I’ve signed up for the annual membership several times over the years, and have always been quite happy with my purchase. I just finished my most recent year and I’m still a happy camper, and I will be back again soon. I wish they offered a lifetime membership, but unfortunately they don’t. The annual price of $79.95 is quite reasonable. The regular monthly charge is $29.95 but there are frequent sales for $14.95 per month.
This is a very solid soft core site, with excellent photography and videography. The archives contain many beauties that are simply breathtaking. I felt that in the past 12 months the number of OMG sets was not as high as in other years, but of course a lot of that depends on personal taste. Every girl on the site is at minimum beautiful. Out of the nearly 2000 models on the site, I added 334 to my Favorites and downloaded every photo gallery and video of each of these ladies onto my hard drive.
If you like soft core you definitely want to spend at least one month on this site. For me, whenever I do sign up I do the annual sub, and I have never regretted it. I’d rate Met Art a little higher just on volume alone, but this is an outstanding site in the soft core genre.
Gamma manages the site now, and cancellation was quite easy. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Erotic Beauty (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5694 Photo Sets, 2393 Models, 199 Artists – there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Only 2 updates per week
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2018. The general style of the site has not changed much at all, but the update frequency has dropped sharply, down to 2 updates per week, on Saturday and Sunday.
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
Back in the day, each of Erotic Beauty, DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica Archives were somewhat distinctive. But the original owner of DOMAI and Goddess Nudes is no longer with us, and while Erro is still photographing for Met Art, the site named after him is no longer exclusively posting his work. So each of these four sites is now posting only twice a week, and there is no theme to distinguish one site from the next.
Erotic Beauty generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called ”pretty” than “gorgeous”. But my absolute favorite photo gallery, with Lisabelle, is found on Erotic Beauty.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, which has now extended to Goddess Nudes and Errotica Archives. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI. And now there might be a third set on Goddess Nudes and a fourth set on Errotica Archives). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 40 pics from one shoot, and then later 40 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes”. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like ‘page01’ at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I’ve also seen them offering specials on lifetime memberships, such as $200 for a site, so if you can get on their mailing list that might also happen (or might not). I’ve also seen them offer most of the MA network (10 sites, excluding Rylsky Art, Eternal Desire, ALS Scans and Stunning 18) with a lifetime membership of 699.99. Again, no idea if this will ever come up again.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month. Right now there is a July 4 special going for 9.99 per month. These types of discounts usually occur around holidays. The next one might be Labor Day, or possibly not until Thanksgiving.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. If you enjoy softcore content, this is a site you should give a look. After you have already joined the flagship Met Art site. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. X-Art (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The softer and prettier side of porn and even hardcore porn
Their update schedule can be very slow, but they are still updating
Several download options on videos up to 4K
Picture sets are important on this site and are downloadable
Very pretty models and settings
Some hardcore scenes mixed into the mostly solo masturbation scenes |
| Cons: |
The update schedule could or can be a major problem for those requiring frequent updates.
Maybe some different races of models would be better? |
| Bottom Line: |
I was surprised to see X-Art updating again. I read about their alleged demise in multiple reviews. There is a catch, the updating schedule includes an entire month of no updates. As of today, 5/22/2025, there have been no updates in May 2025, there also were no updates in March 2025 or January 2025, it looks like they’re updating every other month. I am okay with that. The site has over 1,000 videos and picture sets. The oldest videos still provide high definition videos and high quality pictures. The newer videos, roughly newest 350, include 4K downloads and to my knowledge – there are no download limits.
These softcore sites, even with hardcore scenes mixed in, really do revolve around the attractiveness of the models. X-Art is up there high up the list of model attractiveness, I would like to see other races (women). It doesn’t take away from the attractiveness of their models. Challenging the softcore status of the site are hardcore (male and female) and lesbian scenes. Much like other softcore sites that try to squeeze in some hardcore scenes – it’s hit or miss. The lesbian scenes are generally very good.
There are around 500 female models. A lot of them are familiar to me, but that’s because I joined sites like Nubiles for years and X-Art seems to be a parallel to sites like Nubiles, also Met-Art. They’re pretty, nearly all if not all are slim to medium and nearly all were under 24 when filmed. I think at this point, 18-24 is a good range for the “teen” category, but just in porn.
The photosets are gorgeous. The models strip and tease and show everything. The videos are extensions of the photosets by putting the photos in motion. The biggest resolution I have found on pictures is 4000. All are downloadable.
The navigation is good. The site uses three headings at the top of each page to make it easier. You can click updates, videos, models and Colette’s Choice which is just picks of the best scenes. I don’t know Colette or her taste so I stick with scrolling through the updates or the model index. If you go to updates, you can then filter by clicking on recent, group sex, male – female, lesbian and back-door love, see how prettied up the site is? They don’t even call it anal.
I enjoy porn like X-Art makes. There’s not much story, but the sex is the story. I would bump the score up a little if they included more of a story. Now that I think of it, the story is one, two, a group of young people get naked and do what’s natural.
I’m very happy I joined again and at least saw updates in 2025. Like others, I thought the site was gone and finished. It’s close to a top of its class site, but I will respect the opinions of those who want more updates and keep the score at 92. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
