Nude Photography Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Errotica Archives (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Layout is almost a clone of MetArt, which has very good layout
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
Beautiful girls
Support of the MetArt Network
An excellent softcore site with an extensive archive |
| Cons: |
Down to only 2 updates per week
No new videos since 2018
Limited Model Information. Just measurements and home country
No sexual activity of any kind. The emphasis is on beauty.
No real differentiation from the sister sites at Domai, Erotic Beauty or Goddess Nudes |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it is now a multi-photographer site. Erro last posted to this site in 2021.
I last reviewed the site in 2017, and back then it was doing daily updates. That has changed to now only do 2 updates per week, on Wednesday and Friday.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. That was true during the time this was exclusively a site run by Erro, but that is no longer the case.
Really, it’s hard to tell this site apart from its sister sites of Domai, Goddess Nudes, or Erotic Beauty. All four of these sites are now multi-photographer, and all four post updates twice a week. They also frequently share postings from the same photo shoot. For example, Errotica Archives might post, say 40-60 of the photos from a shoot. Then a month or two later (or sometimes years later) Erotic Beauty might post a different 40-60 of the photos from the same shoot. So strictly speaking, there is no overlap – none of the exact photos in the first release appear in the second release. The poses are slightly different from one set to the next, but they were obviously all taken at the same shoot.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near one another. No sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
When I reviewed this in 2017, the model count was 319. As of today it is up to 1057. There are now 84 artists with stuff posted here, compared to the one when the site was first founded. 5023 Photo Galleries, still posting 2 updates per week. 644 videos, but the last new one was posted in 2018. The oldest stuff dates back to 2004.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99. As of today’s review, there is a sale on for $9.95 per month. These sales pop up pretty regularly during US holidays. If you miss this one, the next one will probably be at Thanksgiving.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it is pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it is not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. MetArtX (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A solo fan’s veritable paradise
Supreme quality photos and videos
Unlimited downloads
Close to daily updates
Fantastic production values
Cheap add-ons for other Met-Art sites |
| Cons: |
I wish the scenes were a little more fun and playful
Not as much tease as I expected |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a longtime fan and user of Met-Art and decided to give some of their other sites a try. My first observation was that Met Art X would be better if: Met-Art was still 100% softcore and did not show fully spread legs. There does not seem to be a huge difference between Met-Art and Met-Art X. It’s more of a small difference – there is masturbation on Met-Art X and teases of masturbation on Met-Art. I do believe that is important to a review. I am sure there are some fans who think it would be great if Met-Art went just a little further in their scenes and they can get that on Met-Art X.
The much more positive take on the differences is it’s more of everything that makes Met-Art great. All the way from the near-perfect navigation to the constantly updating release schedule to the gorgeous models, it’s more like an extension of Met-Art. I am okay with that since they do offer both sites in the Met-Art Network for one price. I just do not think joining each individually is going to give you a different site feeling.
Some of my favourites on Met-Art also have content on Met-Art X and I am torn on whether I like seeing them masturbate or prefer leaving the masturbation to my imagination. First world problems!
We now face the other side of the difference. Met-Art X is likely perfect for those who are impatient and do not want to go through every video to finally capture a view of a model’s vagina or a finger sliding in said vagina. I would even question if a person prefers masturbation over tease, if Met-Art X would be the better choice. It is a huge site, but it is not as big or varied as Met-Art.
Splitting the differences, I believe Met-Art X appeals more to those used to newer porn and Met-Art to those who are nostalgic for the days of porn magazines and the days when photos were more popular than videos. Speaking of, the photos can be downloaded in high quality zips and the videos can be downloaded in up to 4K resolution.
Which is where I will split the differences. If you prefer videos, Met-Art X is the better of the two, especially if you want masturbation too. I have noticed photos of masturbation lose a lot of the positive effects a video gives to masturbation. The best part is the photos on Met-Art X are just as impressive as on Met-Art. It might sound like I am leaning towards Met-Art X as the better join, but I am not. I am equally enthralled in the tease pictures can project and the emotion masturbation videos can project.
That is why I join one then add the other as an add-on. I have joined the Met-Art Network twice and definitely recommend it, but personally found it to be too overwhelming for a productive join. Met-Art X might not ever fully catch or surpass Met-Art, but for some fans – it could be the perfect alternative to one of the greatest softcore sites.
You really will not go wrong with either. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Femjoy (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – 10,000+ photo galleries, 800+ videos, nearly 2,000 models
Daily updates, sometimes a couple extra each week. 1 video each week
They replaced their more-annoying-than-most captcha with what looks like a Cloudflare to show you are human. I use Firefox for my browser and have never had an issue with this.
The site is quite stable and download speeds are solid. |
| Cons: |
Still some technical glitches, although much better than for the review I wrote a while ago. Several models have no thumbnail on the model page, even though all their sets and videos appear to be fine.
I don’t think they have any videos in 4K, which is fine with me as I usually download at 720, but that could be a drawback for some of you. All the more recent videos have at least 1080 as an option |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2017. It hasn’t really changed that much since then, except for adding many more photos, videos and models since that time.
I’ve signed up for the annual membership several times over the years, and have always been quite happy with my purchase. I just finished my most recent year and I’m still a happy camper, and I will be back again soon. I wish they offered a lifetime membership, but unfortunately they don’t. The annual price of $79.95 is quite reasonable. The regular monthly charge is $29.95 but there are frequent sales for $14.95 per month.
This is a very solid soft core site, with excellent photography and videography. The archives contain many beauties that are simply breathtaking. I felt that in the past 12 months the number of OMG sets was not as high as in other years, but of course a lot of that depends on personal taste. Every girl on the site is at minimum beautiful. Out of the nearly 2000 models on the site, I added 334 to my Favorites and downloaded every photo gallery and video of each of these ladies onto my hard drive.
If you like soft core you definitely want to spend at least one month on this site. For me, whenever I do sign up I do the annual sub, and I have never regretted it. I’d rate Met Art a little higher just on volume alone, but this is an outstanding site in the soft core genre.
Gamma manages the site now, and cancellation was quite easy. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
