Nude Photography Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. X-Art (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The softer and prettier side of porn and even hardcore porn
Their update schedule can be very slow, but they are still updating
Several download options on videos up to 4K
Picture sets are important on this site and are downloadable
Very pretty models and settings
Some hardcore scenes mixed into the mostly solo masturbation scenes |
| Cons: |
The update schedule could or can be a major problem for those requiring frequent updates.
Maybe some different races of models would be better? |
| Bottom Line: |
I was surprised to see X-Art updating again. I read about their alleged demise in multiple reviews. There is a catch, the updating schedule includes an entire month of no updates. As of today, 5/22/2025, there have been no updates in May 2025, there also were no updates in March 2025 or January 2025, it looks like they’re updating every other month. I am okay with that. The site has over 1,000 videos and picture sets. The oldest videos still provide high definition videos and high quality pictures. The newer videos, roughly newest 350, include 4K downloads and to my knowledge – there are no download limits.
These softcore sites, even with hardcore scenes mixed in, really do revolve around the attractiveness of the models. X-Art is up there high up the list of model attractiveness, I would like to see other races (women). It doesn’t take away from the attractiveness of their models. Challenging the softcore status of the site are hardcore (male and female) and lesbian scenes. Much like other softcore sites that try to squeeze in some hardcore scenes – it’s hit or miss. The lesbian scenes are generally very good.
There are around 500 female models. A lot of them are familiar to me, but that’s because I joined sites like Nubiles for years and X-Art seems to be a parallel to sites like Nubiles, also Met-Art. They’re pretty, nearly all if not all are slim to medium and nearly all were under 24 when filmed. I think at this point, 18-24 is a good range for the “teen” category, but just in porn.
The photosets are gorgeous. The models strip and tease and show everything. The videos are extensions of the photosets by putting the photos in motion. The biggest resolution I have found on pictures is 4000. All are downloadable.
The navigation is good. The site uses three headings at the top of each page to make it easier. You can click updates, videos, models and Colette’s Choice which is just picks of the best scenes. I don’t know Colette or her taste so I stick with scrolling through the updates or the model index. If you go to updates, you can then filter by clicking on recent, group sex, male – female, lesbian and back-door love, see how prettied up the site is? They don’t even call it anal.
I enjoy porn like X-Art makes. There’s not much story, but the sex is the story. I would bump the score up a little if they included more of a story. Now that I think of it, the story is one, two, a group of young people get naked and do what’s natural.
I’m very happy I joined again and at least saw updates in 2025. Like others, I thought the site was gone and finished. It’s close to a top of its class site, but I will respect the opinions of those who want more updates and keep the score at 92. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Eternal Desire (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large amount of content – 258 models, 1551 photo galleries, 362 videos
Updates come every third day, so usually you get 10 per month
The Babes are gorgeous
Very high quality photography
A little more explicit than Met Art |
| Cons: |
I’d really like to see this get back to every-other day for content – every third day feels kind of light
Full page ad on each logon – easy enough to click past |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and this is my first time back since then. The site has grown a lot in terms of numbers, about double what it was back then. But it is still a site featuring the photographer Arkisi. The models are still gorgeous, the network still runs very efficiently, the navigation is still good. Really nothing to complain about.
The site is maintained by Met Art, but technically it is not part of the Met Art Network. So if you join the full Met Art Network, you get 10 sites, but not this one. (That also applies to Rylsky Art, Stunning 18, and ALS Scan – the editorial content is controlled by the artist for those sites, while the technical part of running and maintaining the site is done by Met Art)
I think the content is still slightly more explicit than that on Met Art – a little more spreading, a little more fingering, a few more toys. It is 99% solo content.
There isn’t a lot of striptease action on this site – I’d say more than half of the photo sets begin with the model fully nude. The videos do start with a little more clothing, but even if they have some clothes on, it isn’t a lot – like just a bathrobe or just pjs.
The models with the most appearances include: Mila (66), Nancy A (40), Gloria Sol (38), Loretta A (34), Elina (31), Serena Wood (29), Nika N (29), Keira B (28), Lisa Dawn (28), Dita V (27).
The regular monthly price is $29.99. The standard PU discount runs at $19.99, and there are fairly frequent specials for $9.99 for a month, followed by $19.99 recurring. Billing is with Rocket Gate, but PayPal is also an option. It is very easy to cancel when the time comes. Annual is $99 per year, and a lifetime sub is offered at $500 (which also includes a bonus where you can select a second site in the MA network to get a 1-year sub).
If you enjoy soft core glamour photography you should absolutely pick up a one month subscription when it is offered for $10. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Sex Art (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The scenes are high-quality, even the earliest ones. No low-res video here
-There is a ton of material; well over 1000 scenes
-The models are overwhelmingly gorgeous
-If you're into creampies, the majority of b/g scenes are creampies |
| Cons: |
-It appears they followed the industry trend of using mostly Eastern European models starting last decade
-Due to having so many scenes, the nature of glamcore porn, and using mostly the same "type" of model, the scenes all start to feel the same
-If you're into cum swallowing, there are very, very few, probably less than 20 out of the over 1000 on the site
-The tag system is made by the users, not by the site. This means that you can search for "Creampie" or "Asian" and only see a fraction of the scenes that would fit that tag. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is high-quality artistic porn similar to what X-Art used to be. And just like early X-Art, it's sometimes a little too artistic for its own good. Some scenes would have been my all-time favorites but a pillow or prop was "artistically" covering the good stuff
A solid majority of b/g videos are creampies. If you're more into swallowing there isn't a whole lot of that; the remainder of scenes are cumming on the pelvis or the guy getting jerked off and cumming on himself.
One of the hottest things in porn (and real life) is when the woman stares into the guys eyes and says "Cum inside me". Sadly since the majority of the scenes involve non-English speaking Europeans, there is very little dirty talk.
There is also a lack of diversity; there's a respectabler number of black women, but there need to be way more Asians and Latinas (and not just white-passing ones as seems to be what they mainly use)
Unfortunately it seems like a lot of mainstream tropes like highly tatted women have been creeping in over the past five or so years. At least they don't say "daddy" or do the stupid step sibling/parent crap. Overall it's not perfect but probably the best you'll get in this day and age. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
