Gang Bangs Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Westcoast Gangbangs (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly exclusive (to the network) content.
Simple fast website (but see cons).
Works with mobile devices.
Choice of download formats with reasonable video encoding bitrates and download file sizes.
Can rate scenes and add to favourites (but see cons).
Straightfoward navigation.
Works with DL manager with decent download speeds.
Bonus sites included in membership (but see cons).
Uses CCBill for billing. |
| Cons: |
Web site looks like it hasn't been updated since web year zero, with a clunky design that harks from the dark ages.
Site traffic is limited per day, with no clear indication of what the allowance is or how much remaining.
Scenes may be a bit samey for some (but not me).
No longer updating.
Flash playback is dated, no MP4 downloads just WMV.
No streaming - must download scene to view it which uses up your daily download allowance.
No scene filtering options or tags/categories like you find in modern sites.
Not all scenes have MP4 download option and download options are limited.
You have to name downloaded scene video files yourself.
PC/laptop isn't a good option for viewing scene videos, only for downloading. |
| Bottom Line: |
I came to this site as it was included with Amateur Creampies.
Scenes last 15-20 minutes though there are a few that last longer at around 45 minutes. As the site name suggests, it features hardcore scenes of a girl getting banged by a few or more guys who usually cum on her face or tits after fucking her in a number of positions. There are a few creampie endings and scenes feature a mix of older and young ladies. That's all I can say about the content - it's not bad and most of the ladies are hot but I wouldn't have joined this site if it hadn't been included with Amateur Creampies. That said, I did download a fair bit of the content.
Most of the content isn't HD but 720x540 which is more than enough for mobile devices, in fact I viewed most of the content on my smartphone, with the PC/laptop experience being not so great and only useful for downloading scenes with a download manager. Some more recent scenes have an option to download scenes for iPhone/iPad as MP4 but these are only either 640x480 or 720x540 resolution; hires WMV is 640x480.
As mentioned, the site design is ancient and looks like it hasn't seen any changes since the early 2000s and is so old that it uses framesets: the upshot of this is that when you refresh a page in the site, you'll be brought back to the site's home page, no matter which scene or content page you'd already navigated to - this is because the frameset contains the navigation links page and the home page within separate frames which make up the whole page or frameset. My advice is to control-click the "videos" navigation link which will load the scenes page into a new browser tab with no framesets, then you can browse content from there.
Another gripe is the lack of streaming, which means that you have to download content just to watch it, so viewing scenes is fairly slow, consumes more of your internet connection and the daily 7GB download limit is quickly used up. I wouldn't say the site is a pleasure to use by a long shot, but it is functional and does the job of getting you to the content you're after. As mentioned, it's better to browse content using a mobile device.
When the download limit is exceeded, you need to wait 24 hours before trying to access the site, otherwise authorisation fails.
In addition to the already-mentioned Amateur Creampies site, here are a number of other included network sites: Nextdoor Amateurs, Creampie Ebony, Creampie Squad, DP Amateurs and Hot Wives & Girlfriends, but found that I couldn't access DP Amateurs and customer support requests were ignored.
There's a fair bit of duplicate content between this site and Creampie Squad.
Overall it's not a bad site, but because the site design and downloaded video resolutions are very dated, it doesn't have a lot to recommend it by itself, but as it's included with one of the other network sites already mentioned, it's worth checking out. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Group Banged (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, which is good for a site that has rare videos
Over 140 videos and photo sets in the archives
Uses tags for searching
Download speeds were ok, not the best I have ever encountered.
Navigation works as it should. |
| Cons: |
I don’t speak German and they need subtitles
Many of the women are not much to look at and the guys are not either
The file names are not unique or helpful |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a bit different from the ones I usually join. The Adult Prime Network has many sites I found interesting and this was not one I was thinking about when I signed up.
My taste in porn is for the women to be attractive, but not necessarily the most beautiful I have ever seen. They just have to be real and have a quality that makes them relatable. I like good looking guys with nice bodies. They don’t have to be carved statues either. I like sex to be energetic, but not a freak show. This site says they use 100% amateurs, and that would work for me.
The site is in German, so I was never any too sure what they all were saying. But, this is porn and models speak with their bodies. I should be able to turn the sound off and still be turned on. I have never joined a German site, but some of these models are not amateurs. My guess was that if the scene description had their name, there must be a reason. Sure enough, if you do a Google search they do actually have pornstars. Mostly they are better looking than the models in the other scenes.
But this is a site specializing in huge gangbangs. Imagine 20, even 30 guys banging a woman. Maybe even more if there are two women involved. The sex is often intense and the scenes long. Some are so long that I can’t call this anything less than a test of sexual endurance. I have to admire the women for doing these scenes, but how many models would be willing to do them? I suspect very few and I think that is why the standard for the attractiveness of the models is low. Many are overweight, a bit over the hill by porn standards, and in general not the best looking. Don’t get me started on the guys. These are not exactly pornstars either. They are not fit, often don’t get hard and many of them have dicks so small that, well you can use your imagination as to what I would say. Many of the guys wear a mask. I understand, but that is not great porn.
What the guys need is a bit of organizing. When they are not in the action, they sit on chairs, stand on the side or in the back. They stroke themselves to stay hard, but mostly it just ain’t happening. What they need is what I once heard called is fluffers. These are women who stay offscreen, and help the guys stay hard. Now that is a job I can have a fantasy about. Hmm. The guys don’t use condoms, but I don’t like them anyway. However in scenes like these I keep thinking about that. If twelve guys just came in her pussy, would you think you should too, without a condom?
Mostly the cumshots are external though and that is ok. I like to see men cumming and the possibilities are great for some interesting scenes. If 30 guys cum, some of that just has to be worth watching. I also liked that many of the models wore stockings or nylons.
As a site, I found it annoying that the videos did not have unique names. Calling a scene 1080p_fullcomplete is not ok. On the other hand there are three options to download and stream videos and the best is Full High Definition. You can make your own clip and the site has 96 already made for you. This way you can skip most of a long video and just focus on a section. I found watching them in a loop to be the way to go, or should I say cum. You also can download photosets or make a slide show. Mostly they are screen shots and the sets have large numbers of photos. I saw one that had 156 and they were a nice 4000x2667.
It was hard to follow all action with so much going on, but I found these videos hit and miss. Some had parts I could watch over and over and some scenes just don’t do it for me. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. DFB Network (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Maybe a different take on Interracial gangbangs than we’re used to.
- Five categories to separate the different types of gangbangs, that’s where the different take comes in for me.
- Not a lot of video download options but all the videos have 540, 720 and 1080 resolution downloads. No 4K but I don’t mind that.
- Downloadable photosets that are better than expected.
- Download speeds are good (75-80% of my max).
- From what I can tell it’s updating about twice per month. |
| Cons: |
- That update schedule may not be right. I am basing the number of scenes they have compared to the last TBP review. They have averaged 2 per month.
- One of the most barebones, basic sites I’ve ever seen and it’s not a network even though network is in the name.
- It’s not all gangbangs either. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those sites that you join when you’re tired of Dogfart. It’s a little different than what you probably expect. It was for me at least. Lets go into the very basic site design. The tabs they have are “videos” which also serves as a dropdown menu to pick the category you want and “models” that’s it. They do have tags on the scenes that you can click and find other scenes with the same tag. The download options on the videos are good. I am at the point that I’m not interested in 4K videos. I just mention it in my reviews if a site has 4K. This one offers 540p, 720p and 1080p on all their videos. There are 242 scenes, those each have a video and photoset. I haven’t hit a download limit.
The categories add a lot to the review, I think. The categories are “Matures”, “Teens”, “Castings”, “Cuckolds” and “Grannies”. I was expecting more gangbangs. The tags don’t exactly help me out as much as I would like. They have a gangbangs tag and a group-sex tag. There are 28 group or gangbangs. I think the big selling point here is the mature and granny scenes. They have around 80 of the mature interracial and around 40 of the granny interracial. The cuckold category makes me wonder about the group-sex tag. It’s a supposed to be husband or boyfriend with his girlfriend or wife and a black guy. That’s group-sex to me. But those are not tagged as group-sex. If you’re into cuckold porn this is some very realistic-looking cuckolding. I don’t want to say it goes into bisexual men but the husband/boyfriend does often give the wife oral while the black guy is having anal sex with her. You know the old saying about the greasy slit it only an inch from the asshole. This is very kinky for those into kinky. There are parts where the husband’s tongue touches the black guy’s dick and the husband licks the cum up and then shares it with the wife. I think they may be missing a possible interested audience in those who like bisexual men. I know it’s not full bisexual sex between the men but you’re going to get really close in these cuckold scenes. There is no bisexual tag. I don’t know if cuckolding automatically assumes bisexual. Those scenes if you’re into that are very believable.
On the updates, the newest scene was released in August of this year. The one before that was in May of this year. The TBP review and facts update list the scenes as 218 in November 2019. They have added 24 in the last 22 months, so it’s more like one new one per month. I do think the rarity of these types of scenes and overall size of the site makes up for it. I haven’t seen porn like this. That’s mostly the cuckolding that I’m talking about. Where it is different than most interracial gangbang sites is the gangbang and group sex often has one or two black guys and one or two white guys in it too. It doesn’t just go with only black guys in those. I do not know any of these models. The models, for the most part, (not the grannies) are attractive enough. These look like amateur models but a few of the names make me think I’ve heard of them like Alex Black. She looks familiar. It’s definitely different than the typical interracial site. What I will also point out is something several reviewers have talked about. The bad part about having group or gangbangs is it takes away from the one on one scenes. I do think that’s a slight problem on this site. Besides the gangbangs and group-sex, those cuckolding scenes, that’s quite a bit of kinkiness. When you switch it back to one on one you lose the kinkiness.
To me that is going to be the selling point or audience this should be aimed at. Those into kinkiness and cuckolding, gangbangs and group-sex. Of course, if you’re into grannies then you can add those too. I guess that’s kinky too. It’s not for me. It’s a good site with very good technical quality. The simplicity of the site will make it look a little drab but it’s also easy to use and there’s not a lot obstructing your views of the previews. It’s a site that surprised me. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
