| User Reviews (20) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content - over 2.7 million photos, over 4,300 videos, over 4,800 models
Recent UI redesign is a big improvement
Some real gems in the archives
Weekly video updates on Wednesday – newer vids up to 4K. Around 9 photo updates per month
Streaming video works well
Recent photos are up to 8192 on the long end
The hardcore usually does not include rough sex, more just two people enjoying each other’s company. I prefer that style myself, but I know there is a huge market for rougher stuff. |
| Cons: |
Recent videos are about 75% solo, 25% boy-girl.
Has a captcha when logging in, though it is a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
No tags. Search function is pretty basic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2017, and recently rejoined this past October. From 2017 to then, the UI had not changed at all, and it looked dated even in 2017. Then about 3 months ago, they went through a full redesign, and the new version is a massive improvement over the previous one. So if you’ve joined in the past, it may well be worth a look again.
In addition to the main Teen Dreams site, there are also 11 solo sites included, plus Les Archive. But none of those sites have updated in years.
The redesign really improved the viewing of picture sets online, although for the older sets (like before 2010) the slide show still uses very small pictures. But the more recent ones now have decent thumbnails.
The models are very pretty Eastern European. In the early days they had some real stars on the site, then they got a little more average, but the wow factor on more recent models is moving on up again.
Picture and video quality is very good. Their photographers have a little less imagination than other sites, but at least there is no artsy-fartsy stuff to worry about. And they focus on the girl herself, which is a plus.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model�s name, hair color, and breast size.
The regular monthly price is $29.95. The PU discount brings that down to $14.95. Annual are $119.95 and a lifetime is available for $349.95. I picked up a lifetime last fall for $249, which I thought was a good deal even before the web site redesign.
Bottom line – this site has really upped its game. It had been quite stale for the longest time, even though it was still plugging along. If you like a site with pretty girls in mostly softcore pics and vids, this site is definitely worth a look. And if they increased the frequency of updates to daily, then my score would easily move into the 90s. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (36) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
