| User Reviews (9) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A solo fan’s veritable paradise
Supreme quality photos and videos
Unlimited downloads
Close to daily updates
Fantastic production values
Cheap add-ons for other Met-Art sites |
| Cons: |
I wish the scenes were a little more fun and playful
Not as much tease as I expected |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a longtime fan and user of Met-Art and decided to give some of their other sites a try. My first observation was that Met Art X would be better if: Met-Art was still 100% softcore and did not show fully spread legs. There does not seem to be a huge difference between Met-Art and Met-Art X. It’s more of a small difference – there is masturbation on Met-Art X and teases of masturbation on Met-Art. I do believe that is important to a review. I am sure there are some fans who think it would be great if Met-Art went just a little further in their scenes and they can get that on Met-Art X.
The much more positive take on the differences is it’s more of everything that makes Met-Art great. All the way from the near-perfect navigation to the constantly updating release schedule to the gorgeous models, it’s more like an extension of Met-Art. I am okay with that since they do offer both sites in the Met-Art Network for one price. I just do not think joining each individually is going to give you a different site feeling.
Some of my favourites on Met-Art also have content on Met-Art X and I am torn on whether I like seeing them masturbate or prefer leaving the masturbation to my imagination. First world problems!
We now face the other side of the difference. Met-Art X is likely perfect for those who are impatient and do not want to go through every video to finally capture a view of a model’s vagina or a finger sliding in said vagina. I would even question if a person prefers masturbation over tease, if Met-Art X would be the better choice. It is a huge site, but it is not as big or varied as Met-Art.
Splitting the differences, I believe Met-Art X appeals more to those used to newer porn and Met-Art to those who are nostalgic for the days of porn magazines and the days when photos were more popular than videos. Speaking of, the photos can be downloaded in high quality zips and the videos can be downloaded in up to 4K resolution.
Which is where I will split the differences. If you prefer videos, Met-Art X is the better of the two, especially if you want masturbation too. I have noticed photos of masturbation lose a lot of the positive effects a video gives to masturbation. The best part is the photos on Met-Art X are just as impressive as on Met-Art. It might sound like I am leaning towards Met-Art X as the better join, but I am not. I am equally enthralled in the tease pictures can project and the emotion masturbation videos can project.
That is why I join one then add the other as an add-on. I have joined the Met-Art Network twice and definitely recommend it, but personally found it to be too overwhelming for a productive join. Met-Art X might not ever fully catch or surpass Met-Art, but for some fans – it could be the perfect alternative to one of the greatest softcore sites.
You really will not go wrong with either. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (5 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
