| User Reviews (18) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Classic and massive network of interracial porn
Almost exclusively hardcore
Great download quality and options
No longer have to pay extra for 4K downloads!
Navigation is easy and effective
Very sexy models |
| Cons: |
Older content has a dropoff in quality
Pictures could be better |
| Bottom Line: |
Dogfart has been around long enough that two or three of their network sites have passed the top site on the network torch. Blacks on Blondes was the first one I knew of. Gloryhole.com then took over as the top and most known Dogfart site. These guys have been innovating and even expanding the limits of hardcore and interracial porn for nearly 20 years.
Their network also went through a major change. Though a major change, it was as simple as handing the network over to Gamma, the owner of 100+ porn sites. Gamma came in, cleaned up the navigation, removed the silly pay extra per download of 4K videos and just like that, Dogfart is back to being relevant, especially for those that love 4K videos.
One of my favorite things to do on Dogfart is try the various sites. There are treasures to be found on nearly every site on the network. There is no reason to ever become bored with the content. The only downside is the older content, it’s often better, is in lesser resolution. The other slightly frustrating, but all too common for American networks, sites that stop updating. I listed picture quality as a con, but only because I felt like these two I just mentioned, are just common for networks and shouldn’t be seen as cons. The pictures could add quite a bit more to the videos, especially on Gloryhole.com, if they were higher resolution.
You won’t find many if any amateur models. The models are nearly all recognizable from other porn sites and most are very attractive, or at least to my aging eyes. I believe removing the pay per 4K download made a huge difference. The network was starting to feel old. Seeing a pop-up on every video download about paying for each scene you download just seemed like a terrible idea the very first time I saw it.
Nearly all niches are covered including, to my surprise, two gay sites and cuckolding has made its way to Dogfart. The sites are still very American by nature – meaning, male-dominated, female in submissive roles.
I would like to see them try some new niches or even revamp some old ones they no longer update. I also like seeing the reverse interracial of white men with black women. They have some of that niche but not enough for my taste. I even believe they could go for some more comical niches like Bang Bros or Team Skeet. Either way, it’s either the best or next to best interracial network on the internet. And see how much including 4K downloads changed the perception of the network? It’s very difficult to find much to legitimately complain about now. Gamma sites all have the 300GB daily download limit, but I still have never heard of anyone even downloading 100GB in a day, let alone 300GB. I don’t see it as a limit as much as a challenge! I think my internet company would shut my service off if I downloaded 299GB per day! |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Epoch was an option for billing
- Large network with lots of videos/photos
- simple navigation |
| Cons: |
- Still very focused on the "thug life" fantasy aspect, but I guess that's the fantasy for a lot of users
- Download limits
- Comments are probably a fetish pay site unto themselves and shouldn't be shown by default. Ugh. Don't overshare, guys. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you've been around for any amount of time you've seen or heard of these guys. Blacks on Blondes, Blacks on Cougars, Gloryhole.com, etc. They've been around for years and, in addition to having one of the most disturbing names for a network, have a lot of content and genres.
You'll run across sites that aren't updating any longer because I assume the star has retired (Ruth Blackwell comes to mind), but their main sites are still updating regularly and offer streaming and multiple resolutions for downloading their videos. There is supposed to be a pay-per-movie 4K option if you want to purchase one specific download for one specific movie, but I never pursued that. There are also photo zip files if that's your thing.
Overall it's a good network with lots of sites and options, but be warned that they push the stereotypes pretty hard. I guess that's a fetish or whatever, but yikes.
One thing that is fun to discover is that the sites/network are old enough that you'll find actresses at the beginning of their careers in works that you might not have seen before. The flip side of this is that there might be an actress that has re-appeared after a certain amount of time and the comparison to both time frames can be interesting.
I hit download limits occasionally during this subscription as well, regardless of whether I was trying a download manager and set to one at a time or if I was just pressing "save as" on my own. At some point a screen would come up telling me that downloads were disabled because they had to be sure I wasn't a bot or something similar.
At the time I was a member each additional 4K movie appeared to be pay-per-video, and that could add a significant cost to the site. If you were a completionist or wanted the best quality of a particular actress I could certainly see the appeal, though. I think the other reviewer had mentioned that there were some hiccups with the 4K purchases, so check to make sure things are working right if you're joining specifically with that in mind.
Overall recommended. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (9) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
