| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
151
|
MetArt
(0)
98.0
|
No Review.
|
07-23-08 09:26pm
|
Review
152
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin. |
| Cons: |
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times. |
| Bottom Line: |
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.
I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.
I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.
I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..
I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site. |
|
06-15-08 07:43am
Replies (7)
|
Review
153
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
154
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Top of the line glamour photography...this ct from someone whose been working as a photographer for 22+ years. Some shooters used their real names...try to find that on an American site. |
| Cons: |
With notable exceptions, models tend to be under-fed, size one types.
Just a few non-Whites featured. |
| Bottom Line: |
Remains The Site for soft-core.
Not for those searching for ethnic flesh. |
|
05-23-08 05:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
155
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
No Review.
|
03-19-08 09:44pm
|
Comment
156
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
02-02-08 04:07pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
157
|
MetArt
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-02-08 03:48pm
|
Rating
158
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
01-28-08 06:10am
|
Comment
159
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
01-28-08 06:08am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
160
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
01-21-08 08:53am
Replies (5)
|
Review
161
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam |
| Cons: |
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny. |
|
01-10-08 06:17am
Replies (15)
|
Rating
162
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
01-06-08 12:24am
|
Rating
163
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
12-28-07 04:58am
|
Comment
164
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
12-28-07 04:57am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
165
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
12-18-07 08:41pm
|
Review
166
|
MetArt
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Videos, NO DRM
- Beautiful Models
- Endless Amount Of Material
- Very Frequent Updates
- 14 Hours Free Webcam Per Day
- Favorites Folder With Rating System
- Fast Downloads
- No Download Limits |
| Cons: |
- Original Met-Art Sets No Longer Archived
- Some Photo Sets Are Bland |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has really sold me with it's high quality material and very frequent updating. You get 4 brand new sets per day to go along with the massive archive. Photos come in 3 sizes (Roughly 3000+, 2000+, 1024) available in fast downloading zip files corresponding to each size. So many beautiful naked models that not one stands out amongst the bevy of girls. Most Erotic Teens has stepped beyond the strictly teen genre in recent years, but there are no hags here. Some of the sets are nothing but bland statue posing by model wannabees, but with such a wealth of material, it's no big deal to skip past these. As of this review, Met has about 90 videos, the newer ones available in divx, wmv, mpeg, quicktime, mp4 and ipod files. The divx are 1280x720 in size, the wmv 720x576. Naked girls with no hardcore to be seen is what these videos are about. They have a high quality webcam with 7 two hour shows daily where you can chat about anything but sex with the naked girls if you are into that. Unfortunately, the oldest original Most Erotic Teens photo sets are no longer archived here, these are collector's items now. Met-Art is what every porn site should aspire to be. Attractive, erotic, interesting, fun to use, interactive with a bottomless well of material. |
|
12-15-07 02:01am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
167
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
12-14-07 07:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Very glamorous
+ Tons of picture sets
+ Multiple sets of models
+ Excelent photo quality
+ Navigation is good |
| Cons: |
- Pricy (but well worth it)
- Video quality can be poor
- Many videos are just of the photo shoots
- Often times there will be radio music in the background, but this applies to the previous con. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're looking for class, then you've found it in MET-Art. This is one of the classiest sites (if not the most classy) on the net! You'll pay a good amount, but its well worth it.
Some of the hottest models around, and not just one or two photo sets, but many of the same the model. The video can be sketchy at times, but the site really isn't about video; its about gorgeous girls being professionally photographed for your viewing pleasure |
|
12-14-07 07:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
MetArt
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Best site in class of glamore
+ High quality photography
+ Pictures in different sizes and zip packs for download
+ Very pretty models
+ Lots of Daily Updates
+ 3 image sizes for download – small, mediem, large
+ good wed design |
| Cons: |
- Videos are boring
- No hardcore or even no spreading
- No response on emails
- Girl-girl photo and video has no sex touching
- Inconsistent shoot quality, photographers not equal
- No information about model
- Small browse pictures should start with lo-res first |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of few sites I keep constant membership. It is best site on internet for glamore. Photos much better over videos. Videos of dancing and strip tease always to soft and get boring. Site has slowly shown more vagina but still no spreading and always leaves me wanting to see more explicit of model.
I email site with question and do not get emails back. Site used to have to many European girls only but now has more American girls to, that is good. I have joined other glamour sites that try to copy met-art but none beet this site.
Some photographers at Met-art make very good sets and some are not so good sets with blurry and graney pictures. They have good photographers and some bad photographers. They have very nice very large pictures, but sometimes larger pictures show quality weekness of some photographers. Also some photographers sets have no variation that model only stand hole set or model only sit hole set which is not good. I want to see odder poses. Please understand my bad English.
They should do glamore with more open vagina. Hair on vagina is nice but not hair by vagina lips and sometime model never show vagina. To girl sets should have girls touch more and kiss and spread more like real life girls do. It can still be glamore and sexy. Model pages do not give information about model that makes them seem distant and cannot touch.
Best glamore site but not perfect. |
|
12-10-07 03:46pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
170
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality for the price.
Huge database of very sexy models.
Easy to navigate.
Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
I was a little disappointed in the quality of some of the higher resolution pictures which seemed soft or in some cases to contain grainy elements.
Too many fully shaved models I prefer to see more trimmed or unshaven. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well deserves a top 10 place but not sure it should be ahead of some of its rivals such as Hegre |
|
11-18-07 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
171
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-16-07 05:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
172
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-07-07 06:00am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
173
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-01-07 08:00pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
174
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
10-02-07 07:44pm
|
Review
175
|
MetArt
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month!
- Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end.
- Videos are now HD quality 1280x720
- Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99
- Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else |
| Cons: |
- Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases.
- As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking.
- You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs
- With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more!
One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli.
I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased.
Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it. |
|
07-28-07 03:14am
Replies (6)
|
|
