Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites.
Cons:
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites
Bottom Line:
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art.
Hi I noticed that they no longer go to ccbill when signing up and must be their own biller, anyone been a member recently and can vouch its an OK biller to cancel and trust.
I've seen an ad for Metart for $5 for the first month. Metart is probably the premier softcore photo site on the internet.
1000s of lovely models, first rate photography, a huge collection of photosets going back to around 1999.
If you've never been a member, or if you haven't joined recently, this is a fine chance to join for the lowest price of the year, to see these girls.
I believe that the sub includes unlimited downloading, but you have to check that out, since I'm a member already, and can't view the offer (I hit the offer link, and am automatically logged into the site, without being able to view the offer details).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet.
-The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers.
-Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items.
-Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor.
-Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it.
-I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets.
-Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity.
Bottom Line:
MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed.
It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet.
Site stats:
Films: 1,839
Galleries: 23,019
Models: 3,878
Photographers: 291
MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation.
During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month.
Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price.
MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems.
If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt.
It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined.
I've tried for over 1 hour to load the MetArt site in my Firefox browser.
All I get is a blank page.
Is the site under construction, maintenance, or under cyber attack?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones.
Cons:
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26.
Bottom Line:
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair.
MetArt will soon offer personal video message from models.
Don't know when it will happen.
But if you're a MetArt member, you can expect personal video messages from their models.
Don't know if that is free, or will cost.
But if the video is delivered in person by the model, that would be great.
Especially if you can choose the models you want.
In my dreams.
LOL.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Excellent customer service. I had a problem when initially trying to log into the site just after making payment. I sent an email to the support team and received a near instant reply and the problem was solved.
The sheer scale of the site. With so many updates it is essential to be able to find what you're looking for and they make it easy to locate particular girls, sets or dates.
The sheer beauty of the women!
Cons:
I consider this site's main emphasis is on photos. Videos are added fairly regularly but they account for only a small proportion of the site's product. I also find them somewhat tame and even a little boring. A solo girl moving about caressing herself with perhaps some stripping off. I would really like them to be a bit more explicit but I guess that's not the style on this site. There are probably other sites on the MetArt network that would provide this style and I hope to try them at some time.
Bottom Line:
I have recently enjoyed a month's membership of this long standing site and as I had such an enjoyable experience I thought I'd post a review. In the past I take a one month membership every year or so to enable me to catch up with some of my favourite young women. I often receive emails from MetArt offering discounted subscriptions and that's when I sometimes join up. I received one such offer a while ago but didn't take it up there and then. A month or so later I fancied joining up so sent an email to the support address asking if they were going to make any further offers. I received a very fast response in which they supplied a link whereby I could join at a good discounted rate. I think I made a bit of an error in providing wrong login details and having paid I couldn't get in. Another email again led to a fast response and following their instructions I was able to access the site fully. So I can really say that their customer service is second to none.
As mentioned I tend to have a membership only once in a while and the capability to search back on the large number of previous sets is important to me. This time I went back by date to the last time I had a membership then went through month by month just initially quickly looking at the opening of sets that caught my eye and adding a favourite marker to these. I could then go back to the whole collection of favourites and download those in due course. So the excellent navigation tools on the site are a real plus point in my opinion.
I am more interested in the still photos of the site and as mentioned above I do find their videos a bit tame and uninspiring. I do like explicit views of these lovely ladies and I've noticed that in the last couple of years there has been some more content of revealing lovely labia and pussy stil pictures but the videos don't seem to follow suit. I appreciate there are other sites in the MetArt network that possibly offer the style I'm interested in and I hope to sample those at some time.
So to sum up I really enjoyed my month of membership. If you enjoy good basic nude photos of stunning young women you really can't go wrong here. I would highly recommend this great site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion.
Bottom Line:
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU/TBP discount, often memberships can be had for under $10 with holiday deals.
The ultimate site for fans of softcore photo erotica with a massive collection dating back 20 years.
Photos come in 3 sizes small, medium and large with a zip download for each.
Video download options from 270p up to 4k, stream options from 270p to 1080p.
4 new updates per day 7 days a week apart from the 1st of the month when you get 6.
No problems using my download manager. (Firefox DTA)
A multitude of user tools to set up your browsing options, search and sort the content as well as an advanced model search and user generated tags.
Billing by ECHST.net (Rocketgate), never had any problem with them and easy cancellation.
Cons:
It's difficult to find any faults with the actual site or content itself. My only real gripe and I get this every time I join any site in the Met Art Network is the misleading pricing how they display the join price in USD and then charge me the same figure in GBP, that's why I'll only ever join any of their sites on holiday deals and stay for 1 month only.
If you prefer videos it's probably not the site for you. I don't care about videos so not really a con for me personally.
Earliest content on the site lower resolution which is to be expected.
This is my first time back to MetArt since I last reviewed it back in February 2012 thanks to the early May $10 holiday deal from PU/TBP and it's clear the site continues to go from strength to strength with the number of photo galleries having almost doubled in the last 8 years. There seems to be no let-up in the production line of hot young women coming out of Russia, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries willing to take their clothes off for our enjoyment and even during the current world pandemic they continue to provide 4 new updates every day. In the last 7 days there were 26 new photo sets and 2 new videos and this is typical of most weeks so still very much a photo orientated site.
Back in 2012 my favourite models here were all the well known Eastern Euro models from the 2000s such as Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat but these days I much prefer the newer generation of models and favourites include Milena D (70 galleries, 6 videos) Mila Azul (42 galleries, 3 videos) and Emily Bloom (53 galleries, 6 videos). Mia Sollis, a cute freckled redhead who caught my eye as a relative newcomer with 6 or 7 galleries back in 2012 has taken over the crown of my favourite redhead from Faye Reagan and now has 67 galleries and 6 videos. Not forgetting my passion for exotic women there's the beautiful Asian goddess Li Moon with 51 galleries and 1 video and the dark, dusky Spanish senorita Apolonia with 18 galleries and 3 videos.
It's interesting looking back at my 2012 review and almost as if the guys at MetArt read it and changed things at the site to suit my personal preferences. The biggest improvement in the galleries is that the vast majority of sets now start with the model clothed or wearing lingerie so a greater emphasis on the tease and a more seductive feeling with the anticipation and build up to seeing the girl naked. I was never a huge fan of the photo sets where the girl is completely naked from picture number one although they can sometimes be nice when photographed in stunning outdoors locations. I was also never a fan of those pseudo-lesbian shoots featuring two or more girls so pleased to see they don't seem to bother with those here anymore and that its basically all solo content these days. There has only been 2 two girl photo sets added in the last 2 years and the last two girl video was released in 2016.
I'm not really that much into the videos and stated back in 2012 that I find the MetArt videos boring so decided to download some of the more recent videos of some of my favourite models to see if they have improved. I think the videos have improved to a point for the same reason as the photo galleries for the simple reason that the models start out in more clothing or lingerie than they used to making them more seductive. Watching Li Moon teasing on a bed in a white lace basque in the film titled “Beautiful Handwriting” and watching Apolonia stripping out of a college girl uniform in the film titled “Homework” was simply mesmerizing. Once the girls become naked though this is the point for me where the videos revert back to boring because they don't really do anything remotely sexual and I find myself just skipping to the end. I guess they don't go as far as masturbation or insertions to keep the distinction between MetArt and their more explicit sites Sex Art and Metart X.
Apart from the introduction of the 4k videos the technical specs of the content has not really changed much since my last visit in 2012. I have no idea if my PC could play a 4k video so don't bother with those. On the videos page in the sort options you can select 4k but on doing this to see how many they have I only got 6 videos in the search result so I assume they can't be tagging their 4k videos correctly to show up in the search. The size of the highest resolution photos still vary greatly as noted in 2012 with recent updates ranging from 4300 up to 9000 px on the long side. Personally I don't see the point of 9000 px photos with a 24 inch monitor when the model's face won't even fit inside your screen. As an obsessive photo set collector who likes to keep every set the medium 2048px photos suit me still as the perfect compromise between quality and file size.
I'm raising my score from 92 in 2012 to 98 today as the improvements in the content make the site almost as damn near perfect as possible for a collector of solo photo erotica such as myself. If they got rid of the regional pricing forcing me to pay 30% more than an American all the time I might even consider giving them a 100.
The update to the MetArt site was supposed to make the site faster and more responsive.
A new interface sometimes takes getting used to.
I can't find the older features that I liked.
So I'm not impressed with the update. It makes it harder for me to use the site, not easier.
In my opinion, the level of attractiveness of the models is going down.
So my enjoyment of the site has dropped.
"Sorry, you have submitted too many search requests in a short period of time. Please try again in a few moments."
That the message I get when searching for models' content.
Guess that MetArt is trying to reduce the load on their servers.
Or maybe trying to reduce their electric bill (joke).
MetArt, you used to be best in class.
What the heck happened to you?
I'm currently a member of 5 different sites in the MetArt network.
There's supposed to be a way of switching between sites with a drop-down menu.
Currently, if I try to switch to a different site, instead of switching, I get a webpage stating:
Update Your Account Details
Three easy steps to simplify your login process.
In the past, when I've updated my login details (by creating a new username and password), I've usually been locked out of the network, until I email customer service and ask for a new username and password.
Which takes a couple of days, sometimes.
So, currently, I can't use the simple drop-down menu to switch sites.
Irritating.
To make things easier, they mess up my account access.
As I get older, I wish they didn't force these changes on me, which make using the sites more difficult.
Also, not only can't I use the dropdown menu to switch sites, but I can't enter the sites directly (using username and password), because I get the same run-around of "Update Your Account Details".
Also, I should add that the update process is faulty:
When I click on the "continue" hot link, nothing happens: I do not advance to the next step in the update process.
So I am locked out of the MetArt sites. MetArt, you used to be a first-class network.
But there are problems with your network, off and on.
Some of them are created by you.
I read an advertisement for MetArt recently that states:
"Clean Photos: MetArt does not alter its photos with airbrushing techniques or other photo altering practices. Enjoy the models with complete immersion."
This is the first I've read that MetArt does not alter its photos with airbrushing techniques.
Some of the models do have tattoos, that are removed in the MetArt photo sets.
How does MetArt remove the tattoos, or keep them from showing?
Is there a special soap that MetArt uses, that removes the tattoos for the shoot?
And then the tattoos re-appear after the shoot is finished?
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Watch out for network discount offer issues if you are already a subscriber
I've been a member of Met Art for many, many years and have an annual subscription. I rotate through the other MA network sites and typically have 3-5 subscriptions at a time. I sometimes get highly discounted offers. However, whenever I try to sign up to a discounted offer, the Met Art system recognizes the cookies on my browser and something goes wrong. Either the offer changes to a higher price or I get an error. The last time this happened was when I got an internal trial offer for MetArtX with a subsequent discounted monthly rate. I signed up within the MetArt network and got an error on the approval page. I knew I was going to sign up for longer, so I just went ahead and signed up for the monthly discounted rate using a different browser and email and billing method. Worked. 2 months later I realized I was being double billed for MetArtX as the original sign up that gave me an error had actually cleared. The problem then was that I did not know which account was attached to my single sign-on, so I reached out to MetArt help to see if they could resolve the issue and maybe make it right. That was nearly 3 weeks ago and all I have from them so far is a "We're working on it." I was just billed for one of the accounts again, so I cancelled both of them, one through the MetArt singl-sign-on and one through Epoch because the login credentials didn't work. Now....I really like this network and will probably be a subscriber until I'm dead, but not being able to take advantage of discount offers without signing up from a different browser with different credentials because you are already a subscriber to a site on the network is just rediculous. I just reviewed a couple of the MA sites and was about to re-review Met Art (for the 4th or 5th time), but I think I will wait until they respond to this issue so I can include it in the review.
Update: The support folks responded and, after looking into the issue, sign-up timing and billing records, refunded all of the double billing and gave me access to the site of my choice for a couple of weeks for my troubles. They also recommended that I contact them before signing signing up with a discounted rate so that they could make sure it goes smoothly. They came through, as I expected. I'll comment again if there are any significant issues with adding sites under the single-sign-on process again.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Being this site, was recently reviewed. I'm going to give a more unique point of view from the site.
The site has some amazing deals for the size of it. I've been able to find access for only $9.95. And it was only at a monthly requirement.
This site is more than worth, the access price I'm paying. It is one of the largest sites, and best organized they've seen. As was noted, there are vast amounts material to look through. if you have not been a member here it is highly recommended. But most of the materials considered soft, seeing the high quality and level that this type of material can be done at a few look at other websites and ask why they don't do similar.
Cons:
Cons:
There isn't much that can be said about this site, being negative. The only thing I could think of that would be negative, is with the mass amount of material modern technology for websites simply did not give it the needed navigation. That is not the site's downfall because simply at this point there's nothing better out there to browse through and find material.
Bottom Line:
As noted above I am taking more of a personal approach to this review. It is something new I am trying on my reviews at that simply stating statistics. At this point it became and sites like this have been around for over 20 years. We must figure at this point that most sites have a mass amount of material, and have certain conditions upon joining either monthly, yearly etc.
Overview.
The sites aesthetics are amazing. Upon joining you find yourself, with an overwhelming amount of information to start at once. You then realize even if you had paid full price that would've been well worth the amount of access. The site has been around for very long time, about eight years ago I gave the last review.I gave it a 90 at that point. It considered it a very well done site than. It is improved if that was possible, to give it a 97 this time. It is improved so much over the last eight years since the last review, that I find 97 is about the highest I could give any site. Anything above a 97 or 98 simply doesn't exist at this point in my reviews. It means they're simply technology has caught up to access some websites making it simpler than it is right now. Right now navigation has been about the same give or take for the last eight years, with little improvement. I am sure sites are waiting for the new technology that will thrust( no pun intended) this industry into a full interactive navigation system.
The good, everything you see within this site is high quality, and amazing the video and photography is unmatched. And something you might see at a professional studio is reflected here. It's obvious they take great detail in choices of lighting, atmosphere, and sound to make it an experience you won't forget. Why this may be on the soft end of things. You won't be disappointed, unless it's simply something you're not into. But the quality alone is definitely worth taking a look. The gallery is something I think that's overlooked as well in websites like this in the day and age of video. The gallery produces a high-quality and amazing experience as well. I 4K monitor, and it is amazing, the detail and perfection that you see on the stuff that's on this website.
Negative,
If there is one thing I could say about this site, is that what you get for the pricing is not all that clear. As a novice coming to that website looking at it for the first time you would not be as impressed as you will be after you join. Other websites tend to put all their best work forward. I noticed the basic advertisement, and interaction to entice others to join is at minimal. It's not a negative for the viewer or the person that may join as a member. But it actually hurts them as a business not to have the material more well known and pronounced on the website. Maybe it's just me but I compare it to other sites tend to give you a lot more before you joined telling you a lot more what's going on inside the site.
Should you join?
It would be worth collecting bottles and cans, to join a site like this if you're broke. It's an experience you won't soon forget once you go back out and look at other sites and compared to this one. Why does lack the hard side of things, the soft approach seems just as rewarding once a viewer looks at the information. It's not often I am impressed especially with the absorption of the jury like this on the Internet. It is so overwhelming, to see the Internet have the material it does saturating the Internet. That it often is very difficult to find anything unique or different. But this site does it well, and pushes itself outside of the box just enough to be above the rest. As was noted in another review this is about as good as it gets for this niche. There isn't any other website out there that I can think that comes even close. And actually other should not even try it's a waste of their time to meet this level that is taken them years to get to.
Closing thoughts,
why do this review, I sometimes found myself a loss for words to describe the amazing job done. Often times in this particular type of business, we look at the sameness, the repetitive nature and it becomes boring. For some reason at least from this reviewer's point of view, they were able to take each scene and make it unique and not repetitive. It's as if they took the actresses, themselves and allowed them to dictate how their personality could be best used in this unique niche. I say unique. Because there's nothing else out there, that comes close to what I see here. I decided about a month ago to take another look back at this site. Then found myself going why did I wait so long to take a look at it again. If you've not join the site you are missing an awful lot of the intended nature of the industry in this niche. I would like to give them 100 I simply cannot give a perfect score to any site that still uses the typical menu system. What is not their fault until something else comes better along I can't read something a perfect score.
Just noticed that the TBP discount is currently at $5 for a month (rebills at 29.99) - might be a great time to check out the site. Presumably this is a short term US Thanksgiving special.
MetArt is getting tricky.
They asked for a new username and password, because I have multiple accounts with them, and different login details.
I entered a new username name and password.
Then tried to login to the main MetArt site.
I then got a page telling me my MetArt account has expired.
Since I have 3 lifetime memberships to 3 of their sites, plus a monthly membership that I've had for several years, plus a more recent monthly membership that is still supposed to be active since I paid for it, I'm guessing that MetArt customer support will give me back my memberships that I paid for.
But if it wasn't so irritating, I'd be laughing.
At how messed up computers can be.
Update:
Problem fixed. MetArt customer service fixed my login problems in less than an hour, and sent me an email with my new login details.
One of the finest and fastest customer support teams for any porn site.
Thanks, MetArt.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the finest softcore glamour site on the internet.
-The site is best of breed. For softcore teen photos. No other site comes close in terms of number of sets, frequency of updates. MPL Studios and Femjoy and some other sites are great, but MetArt is number one.
-Currently, MetArt has a PU discount of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/month.
This is one of the lowest prices I seen for MetArt at $9.99 for the first month.
-The largest catalog of softcore glamour photo sets on the Internet. See bottom line for the current statistics.
-A large number of contributing photographers. So you get a variety of approaches. Not all sets will appeal to any one person, but if you are into softcore teen photos, this site should have plenty of content that will satisfy your needs.
I paid for a lifetime membership several years back, because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly memberships. It was the first porn site I paid for a lifetime membership.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-A large catalog of models: some of the cutest or most attractive teens on the planet.
However, you can also find a huge number of attractive teens at competing sites such as MPL Studios or Femjoy or other glamour style sites.
-Secure login and member pages: https.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the finest customer services of any porn site I've ever dealt with.
The reps are friendly and helpful.
CONS -The cons are stricly minor.
-The sheer size of the site: it's the largest softcore teen site on the internet. You stare at thousands of photos of gorgeous girls, and your brain starts to shut down. You can't appreciate how lovely these girls are. It's human nature, or human psychology.
-Site is strictly for soft, softcore teen. No hardcore action.
-Almost all models are white. Very little variation in race, or age. Most models start at around 18, and some can continue shooting into the late 20s. But no older models in upper 30s or above.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for porn sites.
-The MetArt network used to have a system where if you were a member of one of their sites, you had access to membership plans to join most of the other sites for a discounted price of around $10/month. But they dropped that system years ago.
-MetArt used to have a live cam show offering where some MetArt models or other models would put on free shows. The models also offered private shows, but the free shows lasted 30 minutes or more, and the girls were friendly. There wasn't a lot of nudity in those shows, but it gave you a chance to interact with the models. They dropped that system many years ago, and went with a more commercial type cam show, where the performers and the sytem itself encourages the viewer to pay: These shows, both public and private, can become very expensive. It can be cheaper to go to a strip club and watch the strippers versus watching the modern live cam show.
BOTTOM LINE (start of):
On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,285
Galleries: 16,678
Videos: 1,362
Contributing photographers: 272
On 2018-10-30, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,548
Galleries: 19,089
Videos: 1,544
Contributing photographers: 283
Models are 18-30 years old.
Mostly Eastern European.
Most of the models start out at around 18, but many continue to be shot at MetArt for years, so you have some models that started at 18 that are still shooting at 30.
Some models have over 50 sets at MetArt.
Galleries: 19,089
Galleries include indoor and outoor locations.
The technical quality of the galleries is usually outstanding.
Videos: 1,544
Most videos are a waste of time.
You have beautiful girls, getting naked, and the Wow factor is zero: almost all videos are boring.
A lot of time and money are spent making these videos: I don't know how photo sets of a model can be erotic or beautiful, while a video of the same model is almost always boring, but MetArt has perfected the Art of Making Boring Videos of beautiful naked women.
I have found a few videos that were slightly interesting: Must have been a mistake on MetArt's part, because I've stopped watching their videos.
Also, the background music on these videos is often jarring.
If you're going to watch a video, I recommend turning off the sound.
Contributing photographers: 283
Instead of one or a few photographers contributing to the site, you have access to almost 300 professional photographers of erotic beauty.
I'm giving the site a score of 95.
The site is for soft, softcore teen porn fanatics.
As such, it's such a fantasic site, for a low price, that it deserves a score of 95 or even higher.
Not all sets or photographic styles will appeal to everyone, but you have access to:
-A huge backlog of galleries of teen models.
-A huge number of attractive models: Some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-A huge number of daily updates: 4 updates daily, except the first day of the month is 6 updates.
-A very low membership price: PU discounted membership is $19.99/recurring monthly. There is currently a PU discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
If you do a google search, you can sometimes find a discounted price under $10.00 for the first month.
One problem with such a large mega-site: you become bored with physical beauty. You have such a catalog of beutiful girls, thousands of galleries, that you just don't appreciate what you have.
That's human nature.
Except some of the models are freaking hot; other models are freaking cute.
Unless you are dead inside, there should be plenty of sets that will appeal to you.
But if you want hardcore, MetArt is strictly soft, softcore.
In my opinion, MetArt is the finest softcore site on the internet.
It deserves a score in the high 90s.
The only major flaw are the boring videos. But I've never found a good site for softcore videos.
I CAN'T LOGIN TO METART.COM.
I'VE TRIED FOR OVER 40 MINUTES, AND KEEP GETTING A FATAL ERROR MESSAGE OR A 504 GATEWAY TIMEOUT MESSAGE.
A TEMPORARY PROBLEM WITH THE METART SERVERS?
HOPE THEY FIX THE PROBLEM SOON.
UPDATE: TRIED LOGGING IN TO METART OVER 6 HOURS LATER.
STILL UNABLE TO LOG IN TO THE SITE.
NOW GETTING THE ERROR MESSAGE: "Firefox cant establish a connection to the server at members.metart.com."
ANYONE ELSE HAVE THIS PROBLEM?
I'M SURE I'M NOT THE ONLY METART MEMBER AT PU.
UPDATE: 7:17 PST. 2017-11-30.
I AM NOW ABLE TO LOG IN TO THE SITE, AND VIEW THE PHOTOSETS.
SO THIS WAS MERELY A TEMP PROBLEM.
ANNOYING, BUT TRIVIAL.
BUT THE LOGIN PROBLEM LASTED ABOUT 7 HOURS.
UPDATE: 7.32AM PST. 2017-11-30.
---------------------
I DON'T KNOW WHAT PROBLEMS THE METART SERVERS ARE HAVING.
BUT I NOTICED THAT THE COMMENTS FOR A RECENT PHOTOSET WERE DELETED.
THE DEBUT PHOTOSET: PRESENTING JERRICKA BY PARAMOV.
POSTED 2017-11-29.
HAS THE MEMBER COMMENTS ON THE PHOTOSET DELETED.
SIGN OF THE TIMES: DID A HACKER OR GREMLIN GAIN ACCESS TO THE METART SERVERS, OR ARE THE TECH SECTION PLAYING GAMES, OR WHAT?
---------------------
UPDATE: 8.28AM 2017-11-30
THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RESTORED TO THE JERRICKA PHOTOSET.
TECH TEAM UPDATING SITE?
HIRE BETTER TECH TEAM PROGRAMMERS TO KEEP THE SITE/NETWORK RUNNING SMOOTHLY.
OR MAYBE I SHOULDN'T PAY ATTENTION TO THESE MINOR GLITCHES.
WHATEVER.
JOIN METART FOR $9.99 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
REBILLS AT $19.99/MONTH. METART, ONE OF THE FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO SITES ON THE NET, FOR LESS THAN $10 FOR 1 MONTH.
GREAT DEAL, FOR FANS OF SOFTCORE PORN.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
